Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness
  • Guerin Saw All the Cards In the Original Addison Trade and Still Folded


    Image courtesy of © Matt Blewett - USA TODAY Sports
    Tom Schreier

     

    Bill Guerin laid out his logic for trading Calen Addison to the San Jose Sharks for a fifth-round pick and prospect Adam Raska. They knew what they had in Addison and no longer needed his specific skill set. “It’s not a knock on Calen,” he insisted. “It’s just a change in direction. Calen’s a good player. But he's got 100 games in the league now, and we felt we know what he is for us, and that's not to say that's the finished product. But what we need right now is something different.”

    Guerin felt that the Minnesota Wild needed defense, and who’s to argue with him? Marc-Andre Fleury and Filip Gustavsson have been inconsistent in net, and Minnesota’s defense has constantly put them in difficult spots. Therefore, he had traded a seventh-rounder to the Tampa Bay Lightning for veteran Zach Bogosian, who fills an immediate need.

    "We've been giving up way too many chances," Guerin said. "We need to shift our way of thinking a bit and protect our goaltenders. We have good goaltending, but goaltending doesn't matter if you just hang them out to dry.

    "The last couple of games we've been a lot better at that, and I think Zach will bring some improvement in that area."

    That all adds up, assuming you think this team is going anywhere. Guerin is prioritizing the present over the future with this trade. The Wild need defense now, and they have Brock Faber to run the power play – Addison’s strongest skill. Furthermore, Jared Spurgeon returned to the lineup on Friday. Minnesota needed a bigger defenseman for the third pairing, and 6’3”, 230 lbs. Bogosian brings size.

    However, the Wild have lost three straight games since trading Addison to San Jose. They lost to New York Rangers (4-1) and the Buffalo Sabres (3-2) on the road, then the Dallas Stars blew them out 8-3 at home. It’s not as though Minnesota was rolling before the Addison trade, either. They had lost four straight and six of their last seven before beating the Rangers in a shootout at home and the New York Islanders to start their road trip.

    The Wild chalked up their early-season swoon to puck luck after beating the Rangers 5-4 in St. Paul. But that never checked out. Minnesota is playing under the worst cap ramifications they’ll face following their decision to buy Zach Parise and Ryan Suter out. Their best player, Kirill Kaprizov, hasn’t been himself. Matt Boldy and Spurgeon were also hurt at the start of the season. But they also doubled down on a flawed roster in the offseason by extending veterans Mats Zuccarello, Ryan Hartman, and Marcus Foligno.

    In a vacuum, the Zuccarello trade is team-friendly, Hartman’s is reasonable, and Foligno’s is player-friendly. But in context, it didn’t make much sense to commit to a core that hasn’t made it past the first round of the playoffs. The Wild shouldn’t engage in a full-fledged tank with Kaprizov, Boldy, Faber, and Marco Rossi on the roster. But they could have cycled through young talent with upside throughout the next few years instead of bogging down their limited cap space with veteran contracts. Zuccarello is the only extension that fully made sense, given the number they got him at and his impact on Zuccarello’s game.

    Guerin traded Addison to San Jose partially because he’d get a better team with the Sharks, the worst NHL team. “Honestly, I feel (Addison) was kind of dropping in our lineup, and I think at this point in time in his career, a change was going to be good,” Guerin said. “Sometimes at a young age when you’re figuring things out, when you’re trying to find out who you really are, a change can be really good. He’s going to San Jose and getting an opportunity to play big minutes and an important role.

    “We needed to give him a fair chance and see how it was going to work out. We just didn’t see it going the direction we needed it to go.”

    Given the direction the Wild are going, it's odd that they feel they’re good enough to make win-now moves. They may recover from their tailspin in Sweden or when they return home. But bouncing back to sneak into the playoffs, only to have someone eliminate them in the first round again, doesn’t make much sense. And that’s assuming they make the postseason at all. If anything, Minnesota should use the next few cap hell years to see what they have in their farm system to contend before Kaprizov’s contract is up.

    Addison was the Pittsburgh Penguins’ top prospect when Guerin traded for him in February 2020. Guerin was intimately familiar with Addison’s development. He had been with the Penguins since they hired him as a player development coach in 2011. They promoted him to assistant GM in 2014 and drafted Addison in 2018. Guerin knew exactly what he was getting in Addison when he traded Jason Zucker to Pittsburgh for Addison, Galchenyuk, and a first-rounder – which he used on Carson Lambos.

    At first, the trade looked like a steal. “I had inside knowledge,” Guerin joked. Zucker’s play peaked in the 2017-18 season, and he struggled to stay on the ice in Pittsburgh until his 27-goal effort last season. Galchenyuk didn’t offer much. But Addison was nearly NHL-ready, and Lambos is one of Minnesota’s more exciting prospects. Lambos joins Daemon Hunt, who’s played five games with the Wild this year, and St. Cloud State defenseman Jack Peart as one of their best defenseman prospects. 

    Lambos, Hunt, and Peart may have made Addison somewhat expendable. Still, it feels rushed to move on from Addison. If anything, the Wild should be emphasizing young talent over veterans. They’re not playing well this year, and the current group hasn’t proven anything yet. The strangest thing about this is Guerin saw all the cards with Addison and folded them. At the very least, it’s poor asset management. In the span of a year, he traded Addison and a seventh-rounder for Pat Maroon, Bogosian, and a fifth-rounder.

    Guerin was a player development guy in Pittsburgh. However, his recent transitions suggest he’s drawing more from his playing career than his front-office experience as Wild GM. Guerin was a spectacular player who was productive well into his 30s. But he’s an outlier in a league where players thrive in their 20s, especially forwards. 

    There is no sense in overexposing prospects. Most players get better with experience, though, and most teams thrive when they have a core of talented players in their prime. Guerin traded Addison because he didn’t fit an immediate team need. However, a team that has started 5-8-2, coming off seven first-round exits in eight years, needs more than another 30-something veteran to be made whole.

     

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 3

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    These moves are all kicks at the can while on a budget. Jost, Steel, Addison, Sturm, Kakhonen, Pitlick, Guadreau, Khaira, Mojo, Bogosian, etc. are all efforts to get guys who will fit.

    It worked with Middleton and Guadreau. Kinda with Mojo last season's end. The team isn't in a full rebuild or trying to add a final piece to win a Cup. 

    It's a dynamic situation which is not easy to master and I think we can be glad Guerin is working. Not sitting in his ass or throwing up his hands in disgust. The Wild are struggling but hopefully they can work through it. What other option do they have? Suter, Parise, and Fiala were all impossible keeps. The change isn't a full breakdown but the Wild needed to take a step back to move forward. Right now, I think the lack of big steps by young guys is more detrimental than the retention of solid vets. Dewar, Duhaime, Boldy, Gus, and Addison were all expected to boost the Wild. They aren't doing nothing but they're not leading a youth movement either. 

    Let's see the young guys really prove it and earn their money & positions as core guys...

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Win now to me would be having no future cards to play at all (the Fletcher method).  Addison may not have worked out, but Guerin has yet to give away firsts or seconds.  He even gained one by jettisoning Greenway.  This season may suck, but keeping those golden tickets may pay off someday.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Wild management must believe in the older players they gave longterm extensions to. These extensions will be in effect after the buyouts starting in the 25-26 season. These players are full members of their core, hand picked over the last few years. These are identity, prioritized players for the Wild. Looks like we’re all going to have to wait a few years to see if that’s a good strategy for a deep playoff run or maybe even a SC. I sure hope so! 

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It's assumed that Addison became expendable because of our young defenders in the A. I think Lambos makes it soon, and he scored his 1st goal in the A recently. 

    However, I think the real thing that made Addison expendable is probably Faber. Faber leapfrogged him on the depth chart late last year. You cannot argue that Faber hasn't been dramatically better than Addison this year. Because Faber worked out, you could see the 3rd pairing hole. Addison was simply too small and the odd man out. 

    Guerin did have inside knowledge of Addison. Addison came here and played some nice offensive hockey for awhile in Iowa. But, the year before he was called up, he was demoted to 3rd pairing there too. Guerin was certain he'd learned as much in the A as he could, but nobody ever insisted or taught Addison how to play defense. Perhaps they tried and he just wouldn't listen?

    Addy wouldn't bulk up, Addy wouldn't learn his gaps, Addy wouldn't engage physically. All of this adds up to Addy doesn't fit in. Maybe he fits in with San Jose, but here, he plateaued and wasn't really getting any better.

    Now, some on here have thought that Faber can run the PP. I haven't seen this aspect in his game, but it's worth a try. Faber obviously has more offensive instincts than I thought he had.

    • Like 6
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    We need defense to help our goalies.  So, we trade for a guy who can’t play defense and racks up penalty minutes to make the goalies face an extra attacker.

    Solid logic, Guerin.  

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    49 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    Addy wouldn't bulk up, Addy wouldn't learn his gaps, Addy wouldn't engage physically. All of this adds up to Addy doesn't fit in. Maybe he fits in with San Jose, but here, he plateaued and wasn't really getting any better

    Addison spent all summer working out with the likes of Rossi. He was part of the young group that was seen out enjoying themselves together including Dewar and Shaw. He was down to 7% body fat and working out daily.

    Addy's defense clearly improved this year from what it was last year. You can't expect a 5'9" dude to stand up 6' forwards or the like. You can't expect him to be something he just doesn't have the build for. In fact, statistically Addison is a far better defenseman than Bogosian in every metric including defensively in spite of his size.

    I get it MNFan, you like the move for the sandpaper it brings. What sense does it make to ditch a developing young defenseman for an older, slower, player who is a proven liability on defense and even more so on offence though? 

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    No offense but IMO bill isn’t working hard . When I heard about those extensions my first thought was it’s back to the Minnesota wild country club . Bill did his work for next 2-5 years by signing these guys and giving them nmc s . Nmc s means you can’t even put on waivers or send to minors. . So he has nothing to do for 2-5 years with roster except for little things on the margins. Judd does the drafting and scouting. So Bill will spend all his time trying to find another30 yr old  Fred, mermis or letteri. Not what real GMs work on. Are those 3 even the best players bill could find for the money? Or is it because he’s friends with Fred from pit , letteri and mermis have family ties to Minnesota. Great grifting opportunity  on latter ..He repeatedly shoots  himself in the foot with every extension he’s signed and not one them looks good. So I don’t see hard work I see a new gm making tons of mistakes that’s going to make for hard work in future to fix . 
         IMO addy is a bust. He’s 23 and can’t play d . How many more years would he need to get you a 3 rd round pick . He’s Mike Reilly. We’ were never going to get anything for him. So if bill really thinks this team makes playoffs I get why he traded for bogo. 
        IMO bill has worked really hard to ruin this team. He’s broken kappy and sucked the life out of him by making him carry this team without getting him any help. He’s WASTED kappys prime with his ahl supporting cast.  Bill took an exciting up and coming team and made it small, old and slow with  nmc s . He worked hard to suck the excitement and hope out of this team. 5 years of Billy gets you another 5 years of old and slow with a sprinkle of a 20 th overall once in awhile that may or may not be a nhl player. 
    Way to go bill. You’re a genius for making yourself and the team not have to work hard. They don’t practice or morning skate and you sign all your players so you can take a few years off . Winning culture! 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Does Merrill have a nmc? Is that why he’s never been sent down. I’ve got read up on who has them. That’s messed up you can’t even send them to minors if they’re not playing well or age well. Another unnecessary hand cuff ! 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, Protec said:

    The team isn't in a full rebuild or trying to add a final piece to win a Cup. 

    So we are content to have another year of being a middling bubble playoff team with another early 1st round exit left holding another year's bag of a 20-ish round draft pick? Why do we keep paying old geezers to prop up this mediocre team?

    If we are bad, can we just be bad for once?

    Schreier is correct when he suggests, "If anything, Minnesota should use the next few cap hell years to see what they have in their farm system to contend before Kaprizov’s contract is up."

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, Dean said:

    Does Merrill have a nmc? Is that why he’s never been sent down. I’ve got read up on who has them. That’s messed up you can’t even send them to minors if they’re not playing well or age well. Another unnecessary hand cuff ! 

    No he does not have a NMC. He can be put on waivers and if he clears he can be sent down. If he is nothing but the 7th D then he should be sent down to save cap. At some point Goose will be back off LTIR and he does have a NMC or NTC.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    It's assumed that Addison became expendable because of our young defenders in the A. I think Lambos makes it soon, and he scored his 1st goal in the A recently. 

    However, I think the real thing that made Addison expendable is probably Faber. Faber leapfrogged him on the depth chart late last year. You cannot argue that Faber hasn't been dramatically better than Addison this year. Because Faber worked out, you could see the 3rd pairing hole. Addison was simply too small and the odd man out. 

    Guerin did have inside knowledge of Addison. Addison came here and played some nice offensive hockey for awhile in Iowa. But, the year before he was called up, he was demoted to 3rd pairing there too. Guerin was certain he'd learned as much in the A as he could, but nobody ever insisted or taught Addison how to play defense. Perhaps they tried and he just wouldn't listen?

    Addy wouldn't bulk up, Addy wouldn't learn his gaps, Addy wouldn't engage physically. All of this adds up to Addy doesn't fit in. Maybe he fits in with San Jose, but here, he plateaued and wasn't really getting any better.

    Now, some on here have thought that Faber can run the PP. I haven't seen this aspect in his game, but it's worth a try. Faber obviously has more offensive instincts than I thought he had.

    Faber doesn’t make Addison expendable.  They’re two completely different skill sets.

    A lot of assumptions are being made about Addison.  Everyone is now saying he wouldn’t or couldn’t do this or that.  We have no idea.  

    People just have different skill sets.  It takes a special kind of skater to defend like Brodin, Spurgeon, and Faber.  A guy not playing defense like they can (which almost nobody can) doesn’t mean they are unwilling to do it, or don’t understand what they’re supposed to do.  Same reason why a guy like Foligno doesn’t just go out and score 40 goals.  It doesn’t necessarily mean he is uncoachable or refuses to do it.

    I think it’s debatable what’s happening here.  Something strange.  Addison is not a worse player than Bogosian or Klingberg.  Internal issues with Dean or other players?  Maybe.  Agent told Bill get me a more prominent role here or trade me somewhere I can play and earn a contract?  That’s probably the most likely scenario.  Probably more likely than a guy playing hockey his whole life and making it to the NHL as a defenseman refusing to try and play defense.

    The one facet of this situation that doesn’t get talked about enough:  what an awful trade by Guerin.  The bad moves are adding up.  If anyone needs to be thrown under a bus, I’d nominate him over Addison.

    Edited by Beast
    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Zucc - ntc , nmc … foligno- nmc…. Jo Jo - ntc…

    hartman- nmc…. Maroon-ntc… Spurg -nmc … Brodin - nmc…. Gologoski -nmc … Freddy g - nmc, ntc. 
     
    That is crazy. A nmc means no waivers or can you send them  to minors.  Vegas has 3 players with nmc. Eichel, stone petrianglo . Even if you could trade a player you already lose the value on them with that stupid nmc.. Who gives nmc to bottom 6 30 +year olds ?  There is no reasonable argument for giving Fred , moose, hartman  zucc or goose a nmc. I didn’t know the difference of nmc to a ntc until listening to 32 thoughts Yesterday.  That really makes me lose all respect for the job bill is doing.  So Fred in 5 years is on your roster like it or not. There is absolutely NO accountability due to Bills nmc /ntc handouts. What a joke!  He has terrible people advising him and has ruined this team. No one can give a legit reason Fred gets a ntc, nmc?  Bill is a fool for taking away any accountability.  The lazy players are paying him back for his foolishness. Unreal bill ! 
     

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    We might not like it but trading a smaller guy who gets pushed around and is not hard to play against for a cement-head with beard type is not nothing. We can debate the quality of the players but they are different kinds of guys. Guerin is making these decisions so in the end if they turn out to be dud-moves then hopefully he’ll learn and make corrections. 
     

    I don’t know if it’s really that serious or something you fire a GM about it. The cap penalties aren’t nothing either. Yes, MN’s choice but living with that means they have expectations for proven players and young guys equally because everyone knows the roster is set. Two years of quality hockey in a row should be plenty of proof they CAN do it.

    Let’s just pretend for a minute they didn’t sign Foligno, Mojo, or Khaira. Who could they have signed that would have made MN so much better? Goligoski is in his last year and Fleury too but what better plan could there be? I don’t think it’s that simple. If the Wild were 8-5 rather than 5-8 would it still be the same thing. At this point we just have to take our lot. The Addison Bogo day is sorta a nothing burger in the big picture.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 hours ago, Dean said:

    Zucc - ntc , nmc … foligno- nmc…. Jo Jo - ntc…

    hartman- nmc…. Maroon-ntc… Spurg -nmc … Brodin - nmc…. Gologoski -nmc … Freddy g - nmc, ntc. 
     
    That is crazy. A nmc means no waivers or can you send them  to minors.  Vegas has 3 players with nmc. Eichel, stone petrianglo . Even if you could trade a player you already lose the value on them with that stupid nmc.. Who gives nmc to bottom 6 30 +year olds ?  There is no reasonable argument for giving Fred , moose, hartman  zucc or goose a nmc. I didn’t know the difference of nmc to a ntc until listening to 32 thoughts Yesterday.  That really makes me lose all respect for the job bill is doing.  So Fred in 5 years is on your roster like it or not. There is absolutely NO accountability due to Bills nmc /ntc handouts. What a joke!  He has terrible people advising him and has ruined this team. No one can give a legit reason Fred gets a ntc, nmc?  Bill is a fool for taking away any accountability.  The lazy players are paying him back for his foolishness. Unreal bill ! 
     

    Come on Dean. You took the time to look it up and you still didn't write down correctly. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    20 hours ago, TheGoosesAreLooses said:

    I get it MNFan, you like the move for the sandpaper it brings. What sense does it make to ditch a developing young defenseman for an older, slower, player who is a proven liability on defense and even more so on offence though? 

    It's not just sandpaper, it's gap control, it's clearing the front of the net, it's being able to defend on a PK, it's being able to battle in the corners. For me, analytics points to strengths and weaknesses we should be watching, but the eye test says that Bogosian is a better defender than Addison ever will be.

    But, Bogosian is simply the placeholder replacement as Lambos is not ready yet. I'd suggest that Hunt may have drawn even to Addison. Addison's reduction in body fat to 7% does not mean that he gained strength, it suggests he actually lost weight, but was conditioned better. My comparison to Ryan Murphy is actually pretty spot on. Murphy was a 7th overall pick, could skate like the wind but was just too small. We saw him for his cups of coffee, he was, well, about like Addison, maybe more willing to get run over. 

    My prediction is that he does not make it in San Jose either, and is just as abused defensively. I never really felt like he was that good or special to begin with, though. He had some nice attributes, but it never seemed like he could put it all together.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    What is it about Addison that warrants all this continued talk about him like he was some sort of mistreated and wronged future hockey messiah?  The guy was a late 2nd rd pick who was given the opportunity of a 1st rd pick and repeatedly failed to find the most basic level of competency of his position.  

    I mean bringing up 7% body fat stinks like red herring.   Are we talking about a hockey player here or a model in a photo shoot?  

    I don't get why so many people here are so invested in this guy.  He sucked.  He was given plenty of opportunity and guidance and failed to meet the basic standard.  If he is in the league next year, it will be for tanking purposes.

    We got so many bigger fish to fry than the 2nd fiddle of the Zucker trade.

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    17 hours ago, cloddish said:

    So we are content to have another year of being a middling bubble playoff team with another early 1st round exit left holding another year's bag of a 20-ish round draft pick? Why do we keep paying old geezers to prop up this mediocre team?

    If we are bad, can we just be bad for once?

    Schreier is correct when he suggests, "If anything, Minnesota should use the next few cap hell years to see what they have in their farm system to contend before Kaprizov’s contract is up."

    I would rather do Tom's method too, and see what we have in the kids. They need opportunity. However, our opinion doesn't matter, OCL's does, and he wants to be invited to the playoffs. So, Guerin is a bit handicapped in this.

     

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    17 hours ago, Dean said:

    Zucc - ntc , nmc … foligno- nmc…. Jo Jo - ntc…

    hartman- nmc…. Maroon-ntc… Spurg -nmc … Brodin - nmc…. Gologoski -nmc … Freddy g - nmc, ntc. 

    It's all in the fine print. Some of these guys have short term designations, some have nmc's turn into m-ntc's later. Essentially, any player can waive the designation but they have a say in where they get to go. To my knowledge, only Goligoski has refused to go anywhere (and he should have retired this summer and taken a front office job).

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    32 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

     but the eye test says that Bogosian is a better defender than Addison ever will be.

     

    The last game I saw was the Buffalo game. Bogo was throwing Greenway around like a rag doll most of the night.

    The problem I have with the Addy trade was he was getting better (he was never gonna live up to the hype everyone was throwing at him since the trade, remember the Suter comparisons? He was gonna take his place). But I digress, what I didn't like was BG selling short once again. It's definitely a trend.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Fenton for other reasons. Fletcher sold off his cupboards and then had nothing. At least we can still look in the refrigerator and see some meat marinating almost ready for the grill!

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Will D. Ness said:

    What is it about Addison that warrants all this continued talk about him like he was some sort of mistreated and wronged future hockey messiah?

    Agree.  I would have rather BG rode him out (during these cap hell years) up until trade deadline with possibility of getting more than pack of gum in return, but not going to lose too much sleep.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    53 minutes ago, Willy the poor boy said:

    what I didn't like was BG selling short once again. It's definitely a trend.

    Yep, good call on this trend.  and BG isn't in a position to leave money on the table.  He made a choice to hamstring himself with the Parise/Suter moves so he's got to bat 1,000 on all trades/re-signings/drafts/etc.  Results are mixed in this department.  He's not shitting the bed, but he's not batting 1,000

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...