Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • Minnesota's Draft Need Isn't Center. It's Upside


    Image courtesy of Anne-Marie Sorvin-USA Today Sports
    Justin Hein

    NHL draft season is in full swing, and the 2023 class is a doozy. It’s loaded with more talent than the league has seen in decades – or perhaps ever. It’s certainly the most robust first-round class since the legendary draft class of 2003, which has Wild fans salivating over the possibilities. Picking 21st overall, it’s entirely reasonable to expect the team’s selection to eventually become an impact player. 

    Given that the fan base has been starved of a blue-chip first-line center for the team’s entire existence, it’s reasonable that fans are fixated on the letter next to each prospect’s name on the depth chart. So, how dire is the need at center? 

    Any conversation about the Minnesota Wild’s draft strategy has to start and end with the current state of the farm system. Just a year ago, it was consensus that the Wild possessed a truly elite prospect pool. But two of their crown jewels, Rossi and Addison, fell out of favor with Dean Evason this year. While there’s still time for both prospects to turn that around, Minnesota’s 2022-23 prospect vintage turned to vinegar more than it improved with age. 

    This underwhelming development may be part of why the Iowa Wild parted ways with head coach Tim Army. Hell, the best player this team has ever developed, Kirill Kaprizov, spent his prime developmental years in the KHL. Evason and Bill Guerin gave tactful indications that both Addison and Rossi’s struggles were related to their attitude. Perhaps a culture change on the feeder team will improve developmental results. Either way, the coaching change clearly indicates that the front office took issue with its minor league system last year. 

    The good news is that the team still has a solid base on which to build in this year’s exciting draft. While neither Rossi nor Addison filled roles as a top-6 center or top-4 defenseman, they weren’t abject failures. Both possess offensive flashes, enough to indicate they’ll get a second contract. 

    Furthermore, goaltender Jesper Wallstedt continues to win -- namely, first-team all-AHL honors in his first season in North America. Russians Marat Khusnutdinov and Danila Yurov round out Minnesota’s true blue-chip prospects. Khusnutdinov is an undersized two-way center, and Yurov is a high-octane offensive winger. Both possess the elite skating to become first-line wingers. Or in Khusnutdinov’s case, a second or third-line center. 

    Guerin has publicly noted that each of these players is on track to join the Wild in the 2024-25 season. Swedish winger Liam Öhgren is also on that list. Injuries hampered his 2022-23 season, but he’s poised for a bounce-back season. Defenseman Brock Faber should compete with Addison for a roster spot in 2023-24. 

    The Wild have eight players signed through '23-24: Kaprizov, Matt BoldyJoel Eriksson Ek, Freddy Gaudreau, Marcus Johansson, Jared SpurgeonJonas BrodinJake Middleton, and Jon Merrill. While contracts are muddying the 2023-24 team, the two-year window is surprisingly clear: 

    image.png

    If that seems really deep, keep in mind that some of these guys are going to encounter injuries or growing pains that will delay their development. But even this picture of the roster has some clear characteristics: It’s deep at center, deep on defense, and very deep at wing. The goaltending is entirely dependent upon Wallstedt, but if you had to rest your future on a prospect that way, he’s the one to pick. The glaring problem with this roster is that none of these positions, save left wing, has an outstanding player. 

    Put yourself in Kaprizov’s shoes. He had to carry the team in 2022-23, leading up to a grisly late-season injury. The way the team is shaping up for 2023-24, he may even need to do more. While an improved Boldy and these up-and-coming prospects will provide a supporting cast, he’ll remain the focal point of Minnesota’s opponents on a nightly basis. Kaprizov is slated to be in a contract year in 2025-26. If nobody takes some of the heat off of him, how can you ask him to stay? 

    For this reason, Minnesota’s focus at the 2023 Draft is not positional, and it’s not even best-player-available. It’s all about upside. Shoot for the stars on a toolsy guy like Oliver Moore, or trade up for a blistering-hot scorer regardless of position. If the team doesn’t trade up, holding two picks in the second round opens a world of boom-or-bust possibilities. 

    The NHL Draft is not a time for caution, and yet it happens every year. NHL GMs don’t want to be fired, so they don’t stick their neck out for a player with a low floor. They go for the 200-foot player with a shot described as good enough for the NHL level. Big defensemen are considered toolsy, dependable, and players who skate well for their size while speedy power-play quarterbacks slide down the board. Nashville Predators GM Barry Trotz has the right idea. You can fill out your roster through free agency, but it’s expensive to get first-liners in July. 

    Even if some picks crash and burn, it’s nearly impossible to get superstars outside the draft. Trotz had solid teams in his stint coaching Nashville. He didn't win the Stanley Cup until he hooked up with Alex Ovechkin and company coaching the Washington Capitals. Minnesota’s Cup window can open in 2025-26, but that team will need a truly elite player, no matter what letter is next to his name. The worst thing the team could do is reach on a center when a better winger or defenseman is on the board because no part of this prospect pool can be penned in for starting minutes. 

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 3
    • Confused 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    Position shouldn’t matter because you need good or great prospects to get an elite center through trade. The guy they draft won’t be here in the next two seasons regardless of position (barring somehow trading way up). In two seasons the cap is wide open to trade for a big name center if one is available. Draft the bpa, who can maximize their talent either for this team or in a trade for the missing piece.
     

    this will be a lottery team next and probably the one after. 

    • Like 1
    • Confused 1
    • Sad 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm okay with this. Trotz makes a good point, supports your idea. At 21st will the Wild have an obvious target that could check superstar and center boxes? 

    I just want to see MN more consistently get NHL players from the draft. Two or three in a 6-7 year period is simply not good enough. One per draft should be the baseline. MN always "needs time" for that to be true. Which tells me everything.

    Danilil But, maybe. Elite Swede probably, I'm mentally prepared with expectations for the worst.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Kind of what I've been suggesting as well. Every team wants a top C, but if you end up getting the 11th best C when the 5th best winger is still on the board, are you really optimizing your pick?

    Granted, some of the center prospects will be able to move to wing, but they may not excel at it the way someone could who's been focusing on the position for years and has high end skills & skating.

    Didn't see Bankier listed above and he may be showing up in the NHL by that time as well. He'll turn 22 around the middle of the 24-25 season and could be getting some ice time within this window. Might be as close as Ohgren, who is almost exactly 1 year younger than Bankier.

    Carson Lambos may be joining the defensemen that season too.  He and Bankier were born within 2 weeks of one another back in January of 2023, and I believe both will be starting this season with the AHL Iowa Wild. Merrill will be a free agent for the 2025-2026 season, so Lambos could replace him for that season.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, Skolwild said:

    Position shouldn’t matter because you need good or great prospects to get an elite center through trade. The guy they draft won’t be here in the next two seasons regardless of position (barring somehow trading way up). In two seasons the cap is wide open to trade for a big name center if one is available. Draft the bpa, who can maximize their talent either for this team or in a trade for the missing piece.
     

    this will be a lottery team next and probably the one after. 

    That's the big brain take -- the draft (and all talent acquisition) is an auction. You get it

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, Protec said:

    I'm okay with this. Trotz makes a good point, supports your idea. At 21st will the Wild have an obvious target that could check superstar and center boxes? 

    I just want to see MN more consistently get NHL players from the draft. Two or three in a 6-7 year period is simply not good enough. One per draft should be the baseline. MN always "needs time" for that to be true. Which tells me everything.

    Danilil But, maybe. Elite Swede probably, I'm mentally prepared with expectations for the worst.

    Most players take 3-4 years to hit the NHL after their draft season when you're picking in the range of a 1st round exit. In that timeframe, Minnestoa has selected Boldy, Beckman, and Dewar. Rossi and Khusnutdinov were delayed by COVID and Russia, I don't think that's the team's fault.

    A lot of the lack of home-grown talent comes down to dealing away draft picks, so I'm hopeful Guerin's commitment to holding high picks can reverse this trend. 

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    Kind of what I've been suggesting as well. Every team wants a top C, but if you end up getting the 11th best C when the 5th best winger is still on the board, are you really optimizing your pick?

    Granted, some of the center prospects will be able to move to wing, but they may not excel at it the way someone could who's been focusing on the position for years and has high end skills & skating.

    Didn't see Bankier listed above and he may be showing up in the NHL by that time as well. He'll turn 22 around the middle of the 24-25 season and could be getting some ice time within this window. Might be as close as Ohgren, who is almost exactly 1 year younger than Bankier.

    Carson Lambos may be joining the defensemen that season too.  He and Bankier were born within 2 weeks of one another back in January of 2023, and I believe both will be starting this season with the AHL Iowa Wild. Merrill will be a free agent for the 2025-2026 season, so Lambos could replace him for that season.

    Bankier and Lambos were on the cusp of making this article, and they are high-floor guys who have a great shot at becoming regular NHL-ers. Bankier is already NHL sized and playing center, although he'll need to maintain that through the jump the AHL and the jump to the NHL. The future is bright, but it feels like there's a lack of first-line talent everywhere -- I think this is the year to go get it!

    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    53 minutes ago, Justin Hein said:

    Most players take 3-4 years to hit the NHL after their draft season when you're picking in the range of a 1st round exit. In that timeframe, Minnestoa has selected Boldy, Beckman, and Dewar. Rossi and Khusnutdinov were delayed by COVID and Russia, I don't think that's the team's fault.

    A lot of the lack of home-grown talent comes down to dealing away draft picks, so I'm hopeful Guerin's commitment to holding high picks can reverse this trend. 

    I don’t totally disagree because 2014-2018 picks weren’t well managed and it’s hurting the Wild now. I will say that examples of guys who step right into the NHL make it look worse that the Wild wait 3-4 years for every pick. I realize that’s the average case but the Wild currently haven’t proven much in a positive way. Which is why I choose to be generally pessimistic.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If the Wild can trade back with the Blues to come up with picks 25 and 29, I'd be interested in adding both C-David Edstrom(solid 2-way player, somewhat similar to JEE, but needs to add a little strength) and RW-Koehn Ziemmer(excellent scorer, particularly a PP weapon). Neither seems likely at 21, but both could go late in the 1st, or early in the 2nd.

    Both are rated at least as high as the 21st best prospect by some "experts", so not completely out of the question for either to get selected there either.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    15 minutes ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    If the Wild can trade back with the Blues to come up with picks 25 and 29, I'd be interested in adding both C-David Edstrom(solid 2-way player, somewhat similar to JEE, but needs to add a little strength) and RW-Koehn Ziemmer(excellent scorer, particularly a PP weapon). Neither seems likely at 21, but both could go late in the 1st, or early in the 2nd.

    Both are rated at least as high as the 21st best prospect by some "experts", so not completely out of the question for either to get selected there either.

    In this trade scenario the Wild probably need to send back one of our second-rounders. I really wouldn't mind that, as it seems like there are going to be a bevvy of high-offense players available late in the draft. Many mocks I've seen include elite scorers with defensive blemishes falling hard. 

     

    This could depend upon whether STL really feels like there's a talent drop-off in the early 20's. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    16 hours ago, Protec said:

    I don’t totally disagree because 2014-2018 picks weren’t well managed and it’s hurting the Wild now. I will say that examples of guys who step right into the NHL make it look worse that the Wild wait 3-4 years for every pick. I realize that’s the average case but the Wild currently haven’t proven much in a positive way. Which is why I choose to be generally pessimistic.

    I get the defensive pessimism, but don't be afraid to get hurt again. I always find it's more fun to get excited than to be "ready for disappointment." If the prospects we have now bust, there will always be a new set to get excited about. Usually being hopeless and right is less fun than being excited and wrong. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    22 hours ago, Justin Hein said:

    I get the defensive pessimism, but don't be afraid to get hurt again. I always find it's more fun to get excited than to be "ready for disappointment." If the prospects we have now bust, there will always be a new set to get excited about. Usually being hopeless and right is less fun than being excited and wrong. 

    This almost sounds like you’re trying to convert curmudgeonism.

    Persuasive positivity portends... Can be a coping-mechanism for someone who has been abused. You’re probably suffering from Wild draft PTSD and don’t even realize it. 🤔

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 6/22/2023 at 8:26 AM, Protec said:

    This almost sounds like you’re trying to convert curmudgeonism.

    Persuasive positivity portends... Can be a coping-mechanism for someone who has been abused. You’re probably suffering from Wild draft PTSD and don’t even realize it. 🤔

    Born and raised with Minnesota teams, who knows if I even know which direction is up anymore. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    ^^^ 

    A lot of credit to the GMBG era to soften the roller coaster ride. I have a better belief now that the Wild can eventually capitalize on small gains. The team hasn't sucked in the meantime. 

    I'll take it.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Protec said:

    ^^^ 

    A lot of credit to the GMBG era to soften the roller coaster ride. I have a better belief now that the Wild can eventually capitalize on small gains. The team hasn't sucked in the meantime. 

    I'll take it.

    Hopefully they can build a solid future during these lean years.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    ^^^
    They’ll need to in order to keep Kaprizov in MN. Don’t want to plateau for too long or especially take a step back. If Rossi’s Summer goes good and he is able to get the Hanson Bro’s first shift hypnotized into his mind as part of the protocols, everyone is happy.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I have to completely disagree with Justin's take. WE NEED CENTERS! We also need RWs with RHSs. I get all the arguments about best player available etc... but the facts remain, we need centers. Don't like center #12, then go get one higher on your board. This is not a draft to be passive, we need to be aggressive and obtain 2 shiny new center prospects in the 1st round. 

    If the last 3 playoff series have taught us anything, it's that we need centers. This was our main weakness (and size on the back end). We must change this and go get centers. 

    I'll save the imbalance of the handedness for a different day, but this also needs to swing the other way. I don't believe that Guerin or Brackett really care about this aspect. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...