Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation since 11/09/2025 in all areas
-
Let’s start with the positive. Despite the Iowa Wild’s well-documented struggles in recent years, the Minnesota Wild’s roster features five young players who have spent significant time with their AHL affiliate over the past four seasons: Marco Rossi, Jesper Wallstedt, and Liam Ohgren are all currently playing key roles. Meanwhile, Daemon Hunt and recently-recalled Hunter Haight have also played games for the big club. Additionally, veterans like Tyler Pitlick and Ben Jones have done their jobs when called upon as injury replacements. However, from a team perspective, that’s about where the positives stop. After they appeared to turn a corner in October and won two of three to start November, Iowa has dropped six straight games and plummeted to the bottom of the AHL’s Central Division with a 5-14-0-1 record through 20 games. I watch a lot of Iowa’s games and have been taking notes on my observations as the season has unfolded. As the team passes the quarter mark of its season, it’s a good time to share updates on what’s happening in Des Moines with the team and some of its players. If you have a question about Iowa or any of its players that I don’t address below, feel free to post it in the comment section. No offense The numbers are ugly: out of 32 teams, they are 31st in goals scored (37) and 28th in goals against (68). Their power play sits at a putrid 10.6% (31st) and is in the midst of a 4-for-53 stretch. The penalty kill has been mostly solid lately, but still sits at 21st in the league at 79.3%. Gerry Mayhew leads the team with 7 goals and 3 assists in 16 games, despite not being signed until mid-October. Other than defenseman David Spacek, who also has 10 points (all assists), no other player is in double digits. Haight has produced 5 points in 14 games for Iowa, while Ohgren has had 5 in 9. Every player on the current roster has a minus rating. Goaltending woes and a lack of chemistry Goaltending has been a problem. In the offseason, the team brought in Cal Petersen, a veteran with 106 NHL games, to provide stability and serve as a reliable third-stringer. Still, he ranks 36th among 47 qualified AHL goaltenders with an .891 SV% over his 10 starts. Meanwhile, Samuel Hlavaj, who came off a stellar campaign last season in which he emerged as a legitimate prospect, is dead last in the league with an .871 SV%. The situation was so dire that the team decided to send a message and brought up William Rousseau from the Iowa Heartlanders in the ECHL to start the first game of the Grand Rapids series, a 3-2 loss in which he stopped 26 of 29 shots and played well. However, he probably wanted one of the goals back. Iowa put Petersen back in net for the second game, and he responded to the message with a solid start, stopping 28 of 29 shots in a 1-0 loss. Interestingly, Iowa has played Grand Rapids, who is dominating the league with a 16-1 record, closer than anyone, with three one-goal losses, one of which was in a shootout. Otherwise, it’s been a real struggle. The team recently hit what it hopes was rock bottom with two 7-2 losses in a three-game stretch: one to the Toronto Marlies and the other to the Milwaukee Admirals. The team’s struggle to find consistent lines that can develop chemistry has become apparent. Mayhew has been a fixture on the top line for a while, but the team has tried all sorts of combinations to little avail. Haight, Ohgren, Pitlick, Nicolas Aube-Kubel, and Caedan Bankier are among those who have recently played alongside Mayhew as Greg Cronin, and his coaching staff desperately try to find combinations that can fill the net. Where is Riley Heidt? One name that fans might notice is not among those playing top-line minutes: Riley Heidt, a much-hyped prospect in his first professional season. The 20-year-old rookie from Saskatoon has had a slow start, with 2 goals and 4 assists in 19 games. He’s mostly spent time in the middle six playing both wing and center. Most recently, he has centered a new-look third line with Ryan Sandelin and Jean-Luc Foudy during Sunday’s game against Grand Rapids. Heidt has the look of a player who lacks confidence and consistency as he learns to adapt his game to professional hockey. That’s very common among young players in the AHL, a tough, physical league with many veterans who know their roles and make life difficult for their opponents. Fans shouldn’t be concerned, but how Heidt handles adversity this year will be interesting to watch. One of the hallmarks of Heidt’s game during his time in junior hockey and at prospect events is tenacity without the puck. When he’s at his best, he’s hounding pucks in all zones and aggressively engaging in board battles, using leverage and positioning to win pucks. That has been notably missing for much of the season. Heidt is often hesitant to engage physically and guilty of reaching with his stick instead of fighting to get body position when contesting pucks on the wall. It’s night and day from the player that had fans and media raving about his bona fides as a prospect. With the puck, he’s lacking the aggression and straight-line drives that he has so often used to put pressure on opposing defensemen. It’s definitely worth noting that some of his offensive struggles are probably a product of his environment. When I wrote about Heidt after this fall’s Tom Kurvers Prospect Showcase, I noted how Heidt is “at his best when working in tandem with linemates who can read off his puck touches [and his] ability to make quick, efficient plays with the puck in all zones,” and how it would be important to find complimentary players that maximize his strengths. So far, there hasn’t been anyone in Iowa who can fill that role, and it’s probably contributing to Heidt’s lack of confidence with the puck. For a brief time, he was on a dynamic-looking line with Rasmus Kumpulainen and Oskar Olausson. Still, as injuries and call-ups shook up the roster, that line was broken up. Kumpulainen has struggled with consistency, as has Olausson occasionally. If I were Cronin, I might try Heidt with Mayhew, because Mayhew is an intelligent player with a track record of offensive success in the AHL. That might help jumpstart him. Bankier is a bright spot I’ve been back and forth with where to rate Bankier as a prospect. Last season, I wrote that he had the potential to be a valuable third-line center down the road, and earlier this season, I noted his continued improvement while also questioning whether he had the foot speed necessary to stick in the NHL. Since then, Bankier has been one of the bright spots in Iowa, and it recently rewarded him with the opportunity to center the top line and the power-play unit in the Grand Rapids series. Bankier is noticeable most nights because he's usually in the right spot and gets a lot of puck touches as a result. He’s got a really good release on his shot, which he can let go with power from multiple angles. It’s something he’s definitely improved at over the past year, and he’s tied with Mayhew for the team lead with 40 shots on goal. He doesn’t have scoring touch, and he’s not quick, but he is pretty efficient with his feet and has decent straight-line speed. He makes a lot of slick area passes and works well in motion on the power play. One of the hallmarks of his game is his stick placement when defending. He disrupts many plays and is an effective penalty killer. Another strength of his is that his game doesn’t change, no matter where he is in the lineup. He brings the same steady, two-way presence, which makes him a valuable piece. I’ll be watching Bankier closely as the season progresses to see if he can continue to elevate his game. He’s a restricted free agent after this season, and it will be interesting to see if he gets another contract with the organization and what that might look like. Czech mates on D Since being sent down by Minnesota a couple of weeks back, Jiricek has been playing big minutes on the top pair and top power play unit, while also getting a lot of run on the penalty kill. That’s probably what’s needed, and while Jiricek’s stats have been underwhelming (1 goal, 1 assist, and -5 in 10 AHL games), he’s not to blame for the team’s struggles. That said, he hasn’t been great, either. Defensively, he’s been mostly fine, but that’s never really been an issue for him. At this level, you’d like to see him making plays with the puck and using his size and length to create space. Instead, he’s been mostly vanilla when I’ve seen him, making safe plays and not really pushing the pace. Then again, maybe that’s the mandate he received from the NHL club after he displayed a propensity for bad turnovers during his time in Minnesota. David Spacek has been impressive this season, putting up 10 assists in 19 games and taking a spot on the top power play unit. He makes good puck plays in all zones, and his efficiency with zone exits and as a distributor on offense has continued to improve. He defends well with his skating and positioning, though he can struggle on the rush at times because he doesn’t have a powerful push when accelerating backwards. He’s much improved in board battles and is clearly stronger physically this season. There were reports last summer that Spacek might be unhappy with the opportunities he’s received in the Wild organization. While Minnesota briefly recalled him last month to serve as a seventh defenseman as the Wild dealt with injuries and illness, there doesn’t appear to be a path for him to stick in Minnesota anytime soon. He’s not a better option than anyone above him in the organization. That said, he’s more consistent than Jiricek and is light-years ahead of Carson Lambos and Jack Peart on the organization’s depth chart. It’s starting to look like Spacek has developed towards being nearly NHL-ready. It will be interesting to see what the Wild decides to do with him. Haight and Aube-Kubel are standouts Haight and Aube-Kubel have been the best forwards in Iowa. They play with a pace and straight-line decisiveness that sticks out relative to their teammates. With Haight, it’s just a matter of consistency and becoming more impactful with playmaking. His two-way game and physical play are NHL-caliber. While Haight is never going to be a goal scorer in the NHL, he can turn into a solid third-line player if he can become more of a difference maker with the puck on his stick. Aube-Kubel is a veteran who brings consistency, effort, and two-way play every night. He’s not flashy, but he’s got game and has proved to be a nice depth addition by the organization.12 points
-
Since the the Wild came in to the league theve had 1 -3rd overall pick in the top 3 no 1sts no 2nds the Blackhawks have had 7 picks 3rd overall or higher ..11 points
-
Come on Tom. The Wild may have won seven straight, but they’re only a .500 team now (14-7-5, or 14-12 in other sports). You do know that is good for being tied with the 5th best points percentage in the league? Philadelphia, Columbus, and Buffalo are some of the worst teams in hockey. Philadelphia is tied for 8th in points percentage and Columbus is 16th, I would not call them the worst teams in hockey. Meanwhile, Minnesota scores 2.85 goals per game, slightly more than the Philadelphia Flyers (2.83), San Jose Sharks (2.81), and Columbus Blue Jackets (2.80). The New York Islanders and Detroit Red Wings (2.88) score more than the Wild. So do the Vancouver Canucks, Utah Mammoth, and Buffalo Sabres [italics] (2.96). Sure, we sit at 25th in goals for per game, but since the Utah game, or the last 17 games, we are 12th in goals per game played and 4th in goal differential. Also, there is more to the game than just goals per game. Toronto is 6th in goals per game and sits at 27th in points percentage. The Wild can beat anyone on any given night, but they can also lose to the worst teams in the league. Yes, the Wild lost in OT to Buffalo where the game tying goal was a fluke. The Wild have played 6 games against teams with a .500 points percentage or lower this year and are 4-1-1 for nine points. It's the NHL. Good teams lose to bad teams sometimes. Dallas has played 7 games against the same teams and is 4-2-1 for nine points.10 points
-
Thank you for reading, as always. I don't think there's a size issue with Peart. Obviously he can't do things a 6'2", 215lb guy could do, but he handles himself alright. I think it's more his puck management and positioning/reads that need work. For what it's worth, I don't think they play badly a lot of nights, but when they fall behind, they deflate easily, and they can't score their way back into games. Like last night...they came out flying against Milwaukee, were all over them, but couldn't score. You could just see the energy leaving them, like "here we go again." I don't think it's a systems issue, either. From what I can tell, it's basically the same system the NHL Wild play. It's only 20 games into Cronin's tenure, too, so he deserves some runway, I think. He is known as a development coach from his previous AHL experience. I'd like to see more consistency with lines too, even if it's just keeping compatible pairs together, like Heidt with Olausson. That's life in the minor leagues to some extent, w/ guys shuffling in and out of the lineup and the NHL club having a lot of injuries, as the Wild have in recent years, but I think routine is important for young players, too, especially when so much is new. Lastly, they don't have a lot of "AHL skill." Guys like Kyle Rau, Sam Anas, Nic Petan, Cal O'Reilly, etc., who can bring regular offense, a responsible game, and play well with a good young player that is going to make some mistakes. But, I see players getting better. Haight, Ohgren, Bankier, Spacek, Wallstedt, progressed nicely while there over the past couple of seasons. Some prospects haven't panned out, that's always going to be the case.9 points
-
Buffalo didn't beat Gus with a single shot. Both goals bounced off of bodies after he had made a save. Zuccs "catch attempt" was the flukiest of flukes. The Wild have had all of their centers for ZERO games this year. If Rossi hadn't been hurt we wouldn't be talking about scoring depth. This entire article is desperately negative.9 points
-
The Wild had no choice. Games like this are stark reminders what the Wild lacked for those Parise/Suter years: elite, gane-breaking players. Kap and Boldy were the offensive heroes last night, and are doing it on a near nightly basis. Sure, $17m might be a cool thing to have held onto, but teams are hoarding their stars like prized jewelry. No free agent (getting less and less by the day) is worth what these two are doing. If other teams eventually see the Wild be winners, the tide could turn, and a good trade target will look at the Wild favorably...for once.9 points
-
Both goalies have played some great hockey in November. The Wall seems to be seeing the puck through people right now. Amazing play. A shout out to the team D-zone structure as well. The whole team seems to have bought into a style that limits high danger chances even when prolonged time in our own zone. The Jets owned us in the first period but only got a couple high danger chances because of the structure. We are doing something right that is frustrating opposing teams.9 points
-
Agree. I call this hockey sense and the kid seems to have it. Seems like his motor is good too. And he didn’t grip the stick all night worrying about failure. Kid passed his first big test!!9 points
-
Looking like Yurov will be getting those 1st line minutes some folks have been clamoring for. Hope he seizes the opportunity.9 points
-
You have to admire Rossi's off-season progress. Great work ethic... and it has paid off. Hats off to the young man.9 points
-
IMO...These players down here in Iowa, or any AHL team, are here for development. Veterans non-withstanding. Would i like a Calder Cup team, sure...But it takes many things to fall perfectly in place for that. Constant player movement doesn't help us create line chemistry. Injuries too. They even shy away from promoting a ECHL player that's been performing well and instead sign some smuck to a PTO. There also needs to be 20 guys COMMITTED each night to be the very best they can be. Don't be out there doing figure 8's like your performing Holiday on Ice and whining about lack of PT opportunities available in the NHL....We've seen spurts of good play/players since 2013. From all teams!...So, record wise, i wouldn't read into it that much. Good players find away to "make it". Like I've said before, Jesper just needed a better D in front of him. And that's FIVE skaters not just 2 defensemen!!!...Manitoba in town this weekend🫰🫰Teeroy "Down on the Farm"8 points
-
Great article on our AHL affiliate. I love getting feedback on our prospects and the overall team perspective. I'd agree with your possible assumption with Juricek, as he probably has been told to work on certain things which could affect his overall play. Also, I would imagine that Heidt didn't have a lot of adversity in his youth hockey career as he was probably just flat out better than the competition. Having to struggle normally humbles a person and effects confidence. I think we as fans get impatient with our prospects, which is understandable, but time does take time. We have to remember that the A is a developmental league and at times can look ugly. As long as the kids are getting better and making progress, I'm not overly concerned about their record.8 points
-
nothing more than a bubble team hmm 🤔 Wild have a top goalie tandem Great D core (minus Jiri) - spurge is back to being spurge, Zeev will get better and far ass have played better! They have 1 superstar and 1 soon-to-be superstar and possibly a selke candidate They again had Injuries to top 6 that messed with rhythm but are projected to still come in at 105 pt total any other division other than Central - then I think we are favorites to get to R2 but we are likely to match Stars …. but I think there is going to be a boost to us via trade* this year and that’ll even out the odds for R1 battle *while I don’t think we necessary should trade Rossi - I think he will be the one to go out as he has more value than Ohgren and any of our other prospects (besides the core 3 - Zeev, Wally & Yurov) Tuch? Buch? ROR? And please Waive Vlady (Maybe ROR could be had w just Ohgren and then we slide Rossi to Wing)8 points
-
I know people like to say we don't have a #1 center. But with the addition of Sturm and Yurov, the Wild now have 4 disciplined centers that all have a 200 foot game. Rossi, Ek, Yurov and Sturm. We may not have the elite offensive playmaker at that position.....but they are all capable offensively and elite defensively. We can shut down deep teams and elite offensive teams. Our center backups of Hartman and Trenin are also more than capable of quality minutes at the center position. Don't look now. ... but we are a strong team down the middle.8 points
-
Shhhh! We don't want others to think we're hot. One thing that is hot is our goalies, though. I did want to point out one insignificant play last night that showed us something. Coming down the slot was Adam Lowry, the guy who fought Foligno last night. However, Danila Yurov had his stick under Lowry's and simply would not let Lowry get loose for a rebound chance. Not only was Yurov in the right position, but he did something many other Wild players don't do, he tied up Lowry's stick so it could not hit the ice. This kid has underrated strength that I think we need to acknowledge, and this is why he will not be sent down to Iowa if his offense isn't there. And speaking of his offense, it's starting to come. He scored while centering the top line, but had just changed and still had Trenin and Foligno on the wings. He's starting to get more ice time, and the improvement in his game is climbing a little faster.8 points
-
They weren't incredibly crafty passes, but Yurov being in the right place and using his stick to move the puck to teammates got him 2 assists in his first game on the top line. Kaprizov and Zuccarello make it much easier to get some points, but Yurov continues to do the right things as well. Also, I knew the Wild were missing Zuccarello quite a bit, but I wasn't expecting a 7-game points streak(in the standings) where they'd earn 13 points immediately upon his return. That's fun hockey! Wild are now 10th in points% in the West, but tied with the 4th place team in points, right on the cusp of playoff position. It was just the first 9 games that were really bad for the Wild. Since then, they have earned points at a top 5 pace(.708), and in November, it's been at the 2nd best pace(.833). If they continue earning at least 60% of available points along the way, that should get them back to playoff hockey by the end of the year.8 points
-
Marco Rossi has been sidelined by a lower-body injury, according to a report from The Athletic’s Michael Russo. As a result, Russo and I must (separately) write about David Kampf. It would be one thing to write about Kampf joining a team other than the Minnesota Wild. Kampf is a solid role player who delivers middle-six quality forward play from the center position. His defensive impacts are effective, and he can chip in on the penalty kill when needed. His skill in the faceoff dot is also solid. He’s won between 51% and 53% of his faceoffs in each of the past six seasons, something that any beat writer (or me) will have to take a sentence or two to tell you about. I almost wasted another 15 minutes in Excel providing more context on just how many extra possessions this comes out to, until I remembered: I don’t care, and you shouldn’t either. Here is a list of things that David Kampf simply does not do: Drive offense Score goals Assist on goals Skate on the ice at the same time as his teammates have scoring chances Sure, it happens occasionally. But Kampf does none of these things above a fourth-line level. That is to say, below the 25th percentile. That has been true each of the past two years, as confirmed by Dom Luszczyszyn’s analytical model. There are many incorrect responses you could make to these numbers. Analytics are unfair to role players. They don’t know he’s shutting down the top line every night! Luszczyszyn’s model specifically quantifies the offensive and defensive impacts of opponents and teammates for the 2024-25 season. Kampf actually gets deployed against his opponent’s best defenders and worst offensive threats. The net effect was about two goals for and two goals against. I don’t believe in those made-up stats. Kampf’s faceoff percentage is something you can take to the bank. Made-up, like “goals” and “assists?” I’ll concede that “offensive impacts” are more of a black box. However, if you want to get real, offensive impact is mainly made up by shot attempts, the King of Hockey, with context given to the location of those shots. Compare that to faceoffs. While they are always credited to one team or the other as the winner, there’s no context for the quality of a faceoff win. The team that wins the faceoff can turn it over on the next puck touch. It also lacks context for where a faceoff occurs. Most teams give their most valuable faceoffs to their best centers, meaning the quality of competition has a massive impact on faceoff percentage, which raw faceoff win rate doesn't capture. Do you know who this looks like? Do you know which player on the 2024-25 Minnesota Wild looked just like David Kampf, but a little bit better? Freddy Gaudreau. We did it. We recreated Freddy Gaudreau in the aggregate. Let me be clear: I think Gaudreau is a serious NHL player. He could fit on many NHL rosters. But didn’t Minnesota seek a fourth-line center in free agency? If Nico Sturm weren’t a serious upgrade, why else send out Gaudreau? If the Wild wanted both players, they could have kept both! They traded Gaudreau for a reason, and it isn’t that the 2025 fourth-round pick they acquired for him is going to help them win a Stanley Cup. It’s that another role-playing bottom-six forward does not fit on this roster! And, Freddy Gaudreau is better than David Kampf! The only area Kampf has Gaudreau beat is that he will win between three and five more faceoffs out of every 100 faceoffs they see. None of this even begins to drive at the heart of the issue. It’s not that David Kampf should never take an NHL ice sheet again. He just brings nothing to the Wild that they don’t already have, while addressing none of the issues that have Minnesotans questioning this team’s playoff hopes. Examine this Wild lineup without Rossi: Kampf would slot in at 3C. Perhaps Yurov gets to stay on the third line, but it doesn’t really matter when you look at the wingers in that bottom-six. What if, instead, the Wild addressed that problem? Imagine if this team played with the above lineup, waited to accrue cap space, and put it into a second-line winger. Does it really look that different from blowing a quarter of their current cap space on Kampf and handcuffing their options at the trade deadline? (By the way -- when was the last time the Wild acquired a second-line winger? Drafting Matt Boldy in 2019? Trading for Kevin Fiala in 2019? Signing Ryan Hartman in 2021? Don’t you dare count trading for Marcus Johansson at the 2023 trade deadline.) Johansson slides into a third-line role next to Tarasenko and Yurov, replaced by Hartman when Rossi returns. Both versions of that line fit the mold of the line on which Tarasenko excelled in Florida. Some rotation of Foligno, Trenin, and Hinistroza keeps all three fresh and provides flexibility on the fourth line. Most importantly, though, this would address the two glaring weaknesses of the 2025-26 Wild: They don’t have a real second line, so they can’t out-score mistakes from their rookie defensemen. David Kampf could be Mikko Koivu 2.0, and it wouldn’t address that second weakness. No matter how good the other four players defend, there will be open space to the outside of Zach Bogosian. When Zeev Buium or David Jiricek’s brain falls out and he turns the puck over on the breakout, David Kampf’s faceoff win is not coming to the rescue. These things will happen many times over the next five months. It’s what happens when teams develop new defensemen. Without a serious secondary scoring threat, Minnesota will continue to give up leads and be unable to retake them. It’s time for the Wild to address the problem that has plagued this club since Kevin Fiala departed. The problem isn’t the depth forwards, and the solution isn’t another role player. David Kampf isn’t the answer for a team with Stanley Cup aspirations.8 points
-
I read in these comments so many times that if Rossi was so good, how come he was not offer sheeted by someone or shown interest by other teams. Does that mean players like Luke Hughes or Mason McTavish this year were not seen as great players because they were not offer sheeted either? Or how about Moritz Seider, Lucas Raymond, Seth Jarvis, or Matthew Beniers last year? I would say all of these players were as good or better than Rossi when they were RFA's and none of them received anything from any other teams either. Maybe, just maybe Rossi did not receive one because teams very rarely give offer sheets and it had nothing to do with his skill or perception from other teams in the league.8 points
-
Rookie defenseman Zeev Buium has hit the ground running in his first NHL season, displaying the skating, creativity, and playmaking skills that make him one of the best prospects in hockey. The 19-year-old phenom has nine points in his first 16 games, which is tied for third in rookie scoring and 20th among NHL defensemen. Still, there have been some expected growing pains, exacerbated by the fact that the Minnesota Wild coaching staff has had trouble finding a defensive partner who can complement the dynamic, free-wheeling Buium, who occasionally is as much a rover as he is a defenseman. Entering this past week, Buium had played at least 20 five-on-five minutes with Brock Faber (20:30), Zach Bogosian (28:13), David Jiricek (53:19), and Jared Spurgeon (89:57). Buium has experienced mixed results, partly because he must play in tandem with someone who can read off his aggressive, rover-like mentality, something that is easier said than done. However, the search may be over. Over the Wild’s past two games against the Carolina Hurricanes and the New York Islanders, the Wild activated Daemon Hunt. They’ve slotted him next to Buium on the third pair, with the left-handed Hunt playing on his offside, allowing Buium to continue to play on his natural left side. The early returns have been fantastic. Through 22:42 of five-on-five ice time, the two have produced an expected goals percentage of 54.47%, including a dominating 70.77% in just over 15 minutes of ice time against an uninspired Islanders team on Friday. Hunt and Buium appear to have found instant chemistry, and after some early struggles against Carolina that reflected the team’s performance for much of that game, the duo has really begun to pop. Hunt is a talented, intelligent player who makes good reads, decisive puck plays, is sound positionally, and doesn’t hesitate to join the rush when he sees an opportunity. He has good feet and a solid center of gravity, and almost always positions himself so he’s facing the play. While Hunt is not an overly powerful or dynamic skater, he has excellent footwork. He makes efficient turns, weight shifts, and pivots, and because he’s always facing the play, his movements are usually in the right direction for a given situation. That makes Hunt an ideal partner for Buium, because when Buium is at his best, he’s wheeling around all three zones, slicing through lanes and breaking down defenders with deceptive fakes and excellent lateral movement. Basically, he’s all over the place. Hunt seems to understand how Buium wants to play and, more importantly, reacts quickly and gets to the right places. Since Hunt is always facing the play, he reads Buium’s movements and works in tandem with him in all three zones. It’s not uncommon to see them switch back and forth between the right and left sides three or four times in a shift, and the duo has a knack for understanding when to do so. Here's an example of the type of shift these two regularly turned in on Friday. Watch how Buium (No. 8 ) and Hunt (No. 48) work in tandem to cover ice and move creatively in all three zones, and how they create and fill space. Notice also how both of them defend with footwork and positioning: That was basically a perfect shift and exemplifies what makes Buium and Hunt a compatible defensive pair. Hunt is the first to take the initiative offensively, working a give-and-go with Zuccarello and slicing down low, with Buium reading that play and filling in on the right side. Their pass doesn’t connect, but it was a perfect read by each of them. After they retrieve the puck, they interchange in their own zone, and Buium transports the puck into the offensive zone. When it was time to defend, Buium used his skating to stick with his man and keep the puck to the outside, while Hunt used his 6-foot-1, 201-pound frame and strong footwork to out-leverage his man in front. He then beats his man to the puck down low and creates a turnover. This pairing works because Hunt doesn’t just defer to Buium positionally. That’s the key to taking what Buium can do and elevating it to the next level. A defense partner that’s able to read off of him and work in tandem to create a five-man unit moving up ice and pressuring in the zone unlocks Buium’s ability to break down defenses by giving him the options that he needs to be able to attack with the puck freely. Sometimes, he allows himself to get caught on an island with the puck, and that’s when bad turnovers happen. Hunt’s play reading and movement might be able to give Buium another option and ensure he has that safe outlet, and Hunt’s ability to jump into open ice helps create the space that Buium uses to deadly effect. Here are a couple of examples of Buium and Hunt working in tandem to interchange up high, creating space and pressure in the offensive zone: Notice how Hunt reads Buium’s intentions when he decides to walk the blue line, often recognizing immediately that Buium is going to slice across laterally, and skating hard to fill in his place on the left side. That’s an example of the quick chemistry that the two have developed. Hunt also has a strong offensive-zone presence, using his play-reading and understanding of time and space to jump up in the play at opportune times. Here are a couple of examples of him taking the initiative offensively: When Buium played with other defense partners, particularly Spurgeon, it seemed there was a tendency to sit back and watch what Buium was doing, ready to cover for his mistakes. While that is occasionally understandable, it also limits his effectiveness. Hunt’s willingness to play a free-flowing game is exactly what is needed beside Buium. It also works on the defensive end: The first clip above is an example of how Hunt playing on his offside can be an advantage. Buium roams to the right, and Hunt feels natural when shifting to the left; when the Islanders come in on the attack, they’re still on the opposite sides, which allows them to rotate naturally throughout the D-zone. Hunt can use his skating to recover and kill a play. In the second clip, Hunt and Buium switch sides for the O-zone faceoff, which is common practice for defensemen with righty-lefty pairs, so that each is in a good stick position to handle a won faceoff. However, with both being left-handed, this switch was clearly to allow Buium to make a play if the Wild win the faceoff. Instead, they lose it, and the Islanders come down the ice and establish possession. As the Islanders begin their cycle, Hunt and Buium switch coverage to get back to their right and left sides, and both make positive plays with positioning and footwork to help get a zone clear. The fact that Hunt and Buium press the advantage every chance they get makes a pair that can help put the hammer down and give the Wild the upper hand in possession. The thing that separates high-level teams from the pack is their ability to hound opponents relentlessly and ensure there are no easy shifts. Suppose Hunt and Buium can consistently play at a tempo that forces opponents to match it, one that seeks the initiative at every opportunity. In that case, it will make the Wild a much tougher matchup for up-tempo opponents like the Colorado Avalanche, who won’t be able to count on having a dozen shifts against a slow, overmatched third pair, as has sometimes been the case in past iterations of Wild D-pairings. It's early, and David Jiricek and Zach Bogosian are also looking for chances to get playing time. Buium and Hunt are young players who will have some tough nights from time to time. Still, Hunt has brought a dynamic to the Wild’s back end that they didn’t have. If he and Buium can continue to display chemistry and cohesion, the Wild will become a much more well-rounded, dangerous team.8 points
-
Stats aside watching Rossi play he’s clearly a very important player for the Wild. Every year he gets better. I’m having a blast watching him because his ceiling is kind of a mystery. I’m thinking 70-80 as CS mentioned. Who knows though maybe even higher.8 points
-
Just keep winning. Some team will fall off and a top end trade offer may come. I listened to Worst Seats yesterday, and Russo and Lapanta both agreed that going after a Sherwood would only do so much. "You only have so many assets and trades you can do. Guerin needs to wait for a big offer to come along."7 points
-
I've mentioned before that we don't have a legit 2nd line. Or more to the point.. we don't have 6 players that are legit top 6. Yurov has played well and Zuc is proving that he can still play. What happens if we move Rossi to wing when he returns. Kirill, Yurov, Zuc / Rossi, Ek, Boldy is not a bad top 6....Is that a legit top 6 lineup? It's close... or more to the point... getting close.7 points
-
What happened to the phrase: "Defense wins championships". This team needs depth scoring and defense to win. I still think we are short 2 high end wingers for the top 6 to really be cup contenders. But whoever we bring in... they must adhere to our defense first mentality. It is how we are built.7 points
-
Hmmm... I don't believe a team has to tank for several years to be good in the future. If that was the case then teams wouldn't be stuck in the cellar for decades. It also wouldn't explain how some teams seem to find ways to be competitive contenders almost every year. I would argue that recognition of potential talent and ability to harness that talent plays a much larger role in being an annual contender than higher draft picks.7 points
-
Kaprizov moves back in front on official points, but Boldy's shootout goals are bringing extra points in the standings too. The Wild are playing together incredibly well as a team right now. Can they keep it going all season?7 points
-
A team must play to their identity. We have some solid vets on D with Spurgeon, Brodin, Mids and Bogo. We also have a couple of very good young D-men (Faber and Zeev) creating a very dependable defense. We also have quite a few forwards that take pride in their defensive capabilities. It appears that once we recognized who we are... we started winning. Just a guess here... but I'm betting that Spurgeon and Foligno were the driving force reminding everyone what we are. Kuddos to those 2 for their leadership skill.. if I'm guessing correctly.7 points
-
I think it's important to mention we are also missing Sturm. This team might actually be solid up the middle in depth as we are missing two or three of our starting centers. We very well could have four centers who are capable of playing the 1C spot (Yurov still has more to prove, but looked capable last night). With depth comes options for Hynes. If Trenin and BJ can hold strong at 3C and 4C, I think we can survive until the calvary returns. Oh yeah, solid goaltending is a must.7 points
-
The Oilers had a lot of top 10 draft picks and even top 5 picks that ended up being draft busts. Year after year they had High picks and flopped. They got lucky with McDavid and Draisaitl. The Sabres also have a lot of experience with drafting high and going nowhere. Assuming the Wild owner was willing to go the rebuild route, would you trust the Wild front office to draft and develope that #1 pick?7 points
-
In the age of analytics, player tracking, and data overload, sometimes the good, old-fashioned eye test gets overlooked as fans and media scrutinize players. There’s a reason for that, of course. History has proven that the eye test alone isn’t sufficient for overcoming biased perceptions or imperfect observations that can cloud analyses and lead to poor decision-making. However, there are times when you see a player, and you just know. That’s been the case with rookie Danila Yurov during his rookie season in Minnesota. Beginning with the Tom Kurvers prospect showcase, then in training camp and preseason, and on through the first 15 games of his NHL career, the 21-year-old from Chelyabinsk, Russia, has looked the part of an NHL player. His game at the Kurvers showcase was representative of a player still finding his stride. Still, even then, he clearly was a step above most of the prospects there. It was the first glimpse of the skating, puck pursuit, and remarkably mature two-way game that reflected a player who arrived in North America as a pro-ready prospect. Yurov carried that momentum into training camp, where he steadily progressed as the preseason went on, getting better with each game as he adapted to the smaller ice and faster pace. He displayed skating and hockey sense and diligent two-way play throughout camp. It was clear he was ready to be a valuable contributor and produce quality shifts regularly. Yurov’s game hasn’t been flashy, but it’s been steady. He’s in the right places. He stays above the puck, takes smart angles to win puck races, isn’t afraid to go to the net, and covers a lot of ice with his efficient skating. He just keeps getting better, little by little, and it’s been noticeable. John Hynes and the Wild coaching staff have clearly seen it too, deploying Yurov primarily at center after he began the season at wing. In the team’s most recent game, a 3-2 overtime win over the first-place Vegas Golden Knights team, Yurov played a season high 13:09, including nearly four minutes on the top line with Kirill Kaprizov and Mats Zuccarello after Ryan Hartman left with an injury. After the recent news that Hartman is week-to-week with a lower-body injury, and with Marco Rossi still on the shelf, The Athletic’s Michael Russo has reported that Yurov is going to get another shot with the Wild’s dynamic duo against the Carolina Hurricanes on Wednesday. Playing on the top line against the Hurricanes will be Yurov’s stiffest test yet. They have looked like a buzzsaw this season, overwhelming opponents with their depth, aggressive defending, and relentless forechecking. The Wild experienced this first-hand less than two weeks ago, when Carolina thoroughly outplayed them for long stretches during a 4-3 defeat. Yurov was a healthy scratch for the third consecutive game that night in Carolina. It’s not a coincidence that he's been in the lineup every night since. His skating and intelligence would have been an asset. The Wild first activated him the next night against the New York Islanders and made an immediate impact with a first-period goal. Yurov makes small but noticeable contributions almost every shift, and he’s starting to pass more than just the eye test. According to Natural Stat Trick, he has produced an expected goal percentage of 55% or higher in five of his past seven games, and the Wild have outscored their opponents 2-0 during his minutes over that time. Minnesota has also broken even with high-danger scoring chances during his minutes over that stretch. He produces these numbers with intelligent positioning, a surprisingly strong stick that can win puck battles or maintain possession under pressure, and excellent skating. On Yakov Trenin’s first goal of the season against Vegas on Sunday, Yurov made two key plays that led to the goal. The first was out-leveraging Ivan Barbeshev for a loose puck after the Wild entered the offensive zone, and the second was another won stick battle in which he beat Ben Hutton to a loose puck down low and poked it free to Trenin. He did that after he made the correct read to get to the corner and capitalize on a loose puck created by Marcus Foligno. Yurov earned his first career assist on this play, and the way he did it is indicative of how he’s been able to turn in a quietly impressive rookie campaign. Smart reads, timely positioning, and a good stick go a long way in the NHL, where victories often hinge on repeatedly winning the small moments. He’s still a young player who will have some rough nights here and there, and there’s a lot of hockey left to be played this season. Still, there’s no question that Yurov is becoming a valuable contributor to Minnesota’s lineup. Wild fans have long wondered exactly what type of player he’d be once he finally arrived, and they haven’t been disappointed. Because when it comes to this rookie, seeing is believing.7 points
-
That was me. I am psyched about Yurov. He looks like Selke material. It's just rare for us to have a rookie hit the ground running and Yurov is doing exactly that. I like his game... it's disciplined and he has great instincts for puck control in the Ozone. He shows little flashes of skill and is confident but still reserved. I think there is a lot more in the tank with Yurov. I don't know if he will mesh well with KK and Zucc. It will be interesting to watch tonight. I thought he was great with Folino and Trenin. I'm also psyched about Zeev. Makar comparisons with Zeev are as outrageous as Barkov comparisons with Yurov I guess so call me guilty. Zeev's game is evolving game by game. He has toned it down (maybe too much) and is playing more balanced. His D game is also getting better. I really like him on PP1 and maybe work him into OT slowly. His decisions on the blue line are starting to look less frantic and loose game by game. He is engaging in the O zone at times and blowing me away with his talent, but hasn't developed the vision yet to be that playmaker. These two rookies are worthy of getting psyched about. Wally too. I won't let MN PTSD fandom bring me down.7 points
-
Most important: Foligno and Trenin are just wrecking faces. A lot of the Wild's success and energy last night was in no small part to laying into Vegas hard. This team will probably never be a track meet team. If the first part of the season is any indication, they shouldn't try. It led to them stumbling really hard. Hynes talked about "identity" a lot. Punching one of the highest scoring teams in the mouth and keeping the last 4-5 opponents to 2 goals or less is what Wild games are. Hunt for Jiricek also made a huge difference. One day, Jiricek may be better, but results never lie: Hunt is a better fit.7 points
-
Anyone thinking the team is "done" already can stop. The team will not just give up on its own. What this stretch should tell us is whether or not the weird parity this season has been on is a mirage or not. Too many teams are where the Wild are (no mans land). What I hope for is seeing is some separation happens so the Wild know by the fabled Thanksgiving, "What can we we do and what "should" we do, cause those are different things Wins and OT points will work wonders. The "defeatist" will only happen if all these teams just beat the Wild to a pulp and they get nothing.7 points
-
Some of you guys will never ever get it. Rossi is a very effective, silent, clever Center and getting better every season. He is a playmaker, making his line scoring without losing defensive responsibility. He is not the (expensive) hey-man, but provides solid, effective productivity. In other words: you can't buy that breed.7 points
-
Always been a rossi fan. Each year he gets better and takes all the criticism and works on improving those areas of his game. He also does it without fanfare or pitching a fit, making demands. If he continues to improve and hits 70 to 80pts, I'm with CS and the others that mention the trade talks better be put to bed. But I worry about Billy and his unwillingness to change as several on this board previously pointed out. I would still like to see yurov elevated as well.7 points
-
If he ends the season at 70-80 points, I think any complaints will probably get ditched in a bin. I get that people want a McDavid, MacKinnon or what not, but having Kaprizov, Rossi, (and hopefully Boldy) at those kinds of point totals will calm things down. But this again goes to the "1C vs. Top 10 scoring center" argument I've had for a couple years. Haters won't be happy unless Rossi is those players levels. Reminder that Staal had 76 one time. Rossi doing anything close should be cause for celebration when Koivu, Ek, Granlund, and Staal for a cup of coffee have been the slim center pickings.7 points
-
The article sounds like they are talking about Ek. At 6' 3'' and 216 pounds he has a similar build. If Stramel can learn the defensive side of the puck it would be fantastic to have another Ek on the team.6 points
-
The issue was positional. They did not have any clue Rossi would become what he is and still could be. I forget if Yurov had even gotten drafted or not, but he was a winger too. Rossi struggled out the gate for a year, so they took chances on three centers hoping one of them makes it. Yurov and Rossi doing what they are doing has helped ease the immediate issue, and getting a winger in a trade might be easier than a center. Stramel hopefully is ready by the ready Hartman and Sturm's contracts are up. It doesn't look like Kunpulainen nor Heidt will.6 points
-
Getting Stramel to contribute at the NHL level after what everyone feared was a total bust would be a huge win.6 points
-
Charlie Stramel’s progress was one of the Minnesota Wild’s most encouraging prospect stories this year. The former first-round pick had struggled in his first two NCAA seasons with Wisconsin after playing well with the U.S. National Development Team. His transfer to Michigan State and reunion with former coach Adam Nightinengale seemed to be a last-ditch effort to get his development on track. The move did wonders for the center, improving his point totals from eight in his last season with Wisconsin to 27 in his first season in East Lansing. His play this season has been even better. Stramel is building on his breakout junior year and showing even more signs that some people who called him a bust too soon were wrong. Michigan State is 14 games into its season. In those contests, Stramel has established himself as a true No. 1 center. He defends well, contributes offensively, and is a crucial part of a No. 3-ranked program in the country. Stramel is second on the team in scoring, with six goals and 11 assists, his highest points-per-game (1.21) output of his college career. His scoring jump has been partly due to Stramel's consistent, assertive play. He’s averaging 2.64 shots per game this season after putting up 2.3 shots per game last season. While the numbers on the stat sheet have been encouraging, a deep dive into Stramel’s play that’s produced them provides vital context. The first thing that stood out about Stramel’s play is that he’s continued to build on one of the best aspects from his last campaign. He’s doing a great job at using one of his best assets, his size, to his advantage. Stramel is listed at 6-foot-3, 216 pounds, and has always had a physical edge to his game. During his tenure in Wisconsin, he was unable to use that effectively to create offense, which was a significant factor in his lack of production with the Badgers. Since transferring to Michigan State, the Rosemount, Minn. native has been far more effective at playing like the power forward he projects to be at the next level. He can dominate in the offensive zone in front of the net and create offense with deflections, rebound chances, and generally create issues for the other team’s goaltender. Plays like the one above against Boston University are excellent showcases for Stramel’s instincts. As soon as the defender starts to follow the forward into the corner, Stramel parks himself in the newly vacated spot on the ice. The other BU defender is too burdened to put full effort into clearing Stramel out of the net-front area, which leads to Stramel’s deflection goal. Stramel’s ability to be a net-front presence has been a signature during his time with the Spartans. However, he’s also developed into a proficient distributor. When the Wild drafted Stramel, his passing was a trait that made him a first-round prospect. The EliteProspects 2023 NHL Draft Guide highlighted it as one of his strengths. Stramel's skill as a small-area distributor was a constant across our viewings, something that seemed immune to the noise around him. His ability to parry opponents and sequence plays with touch and pace from in tight made him a constant offensive driver during sustained offensive zone pressures. Like most of his talents, that distributing ability didn’t initially translate to college hockey. In 67 games with the Badgers, Stramel registered just 12 assists. His playmaking rebounding last year with 18 assists in 37 games, but it’s been even better this season. Stramel’s .79 assists per game this year (11 in 14 games) is by far the best of his career, going back to when he was with the U.S. National Developmental team. A few of Stramel’s assists this season highlight how much he’s improved as a playmaker. The goal above is an excellent example of the small-area distribution that Elite Prospects praised in their 2023 draft guide. Stramel jumps on a loose puck behind the net and has the vision to see Porter Martone alone on the other side of the net. It would be an easy play for Stramel to play the puck along the boards or try to maintain possession on the power play, but recognizing the opportunity to reverse play and find Martone is a quick decision that showcases his vision. That passing play is impressive and also highlights Stramel’s chemistry with forward Porter Martone. The Philadelphia Flyers took Martone sixth overall in 2025 after he made the jump from the CHL to the NCAA. Some players have had difficulty moving from Canadian juniors to college hockey, but not Martone. He leads all first-year students in the NCAA with 19 points, and that’s largely due to the synergy he’s built with Stramel. When Stramel distributes the puck the way he has this season, it unlocks a whole dimension to his game. It’s the perfect complement to his physical abilities. Stramel acts as a hub for the Michigan State attack, creating a gravitational pull with his size and strength. When defenders crash down low on Stramel, it opens lanes for his teammates. That style of play gives him potential to contribute offensively at the next level, even if he’s never expected to score like a top-six forward in the NHL. While it’s great to see Stramel perform in college, the important thing is to project whether he'll be a difference-maker for the Wild. That remains to be seen, but he’s much closer to it now than he was during his first couple of years in college hockey. Stramel is a physically gifted center who is responsible defensively, wins more than half of his faceoffs, and can drive a line with his assertive play and talent as a distributor. The Wild have struggled to find consistency at center in recent years, with faceoffs a particular weakness. He may not project as a star NHLer, but Stramel’s progress at Michigan State positions him well to at least get the chance to show he can play a role for the Wild after he finishes his collegiate career.6 points
-
And Stramel is looking good this year at Michigan State with 17 points in 14 games. He may never be a stud player, but should be able to slide into 4C or 3C fairly quickly6 points
-
There are superstars, there are Hart Trophy winners, and there are Hall of Famers. But there's nothing more terrifying than the [YOUR TEAM HERE] Killer. The guy who is liable to get a goal against your team every time they line up against your best defensemen. The player who can make you nervous in crunch time, even if no one else makes a peep against you. Minnesota Wild fans are no strangers to this concept. Jarome Iginla was perhaps the most notorious Wild Killer of all time, notching 39 of his 625 games against Minnesota... and that's without the team even existing for his first four seasons. Twin incredible Colorado Avalanche centers, Joe Sakic (16 goals, 38 points in 41 games against Minnesota) and Nathan MacKinnon (24 goals, 64 points in 52 games), could also lay claim to that title. But the Wild have, historically, been short on [OTHER TEAM] Killers. Their top goal-scorers, Marian Gaborik and Zach Parise, in particular, weren't known for being a thorn in the side of their top rivals. Or at least, until now. We've seen enough, we're calling it: Kirill Kaprizov is officially an Avalanche Killer. According to NHL Network's Top-100 player rankings, the Wild faced off against the second (MacKinnon) and fourth-best (Cale Makar) players in the entire league. They rolled into Grand Casino Arena with one (one!!!) regulation loss in 23 games. But Kaprizov was their equal as the Wild somehow went toe-to-toe with the Avs in a track meet. Kaprizov didn't score in overtime or the shootout, but he dragged Minnesota to the extra frame. His 200th and 201st goals were both the result of will over skill, crashing the net to cash in both times. It's far from the first game Kaprizov has terrorized the Avalanche. Friday was his 13th and 14th career goals against Colorado, making the Avs the team he's scored the most goals against during his career. It's the most that anyone has scored against the Avalanche since Kaprizov entered the league. It's not even close. Most Goals vs. Avalanche, since 2020-21: 1. Kirill Kaprizov, 14 T-2. David Pastrnak, 10 T-2. Kevin Fiala, 10 T-2. Gabriel Vilardi, 10 T-5. Tage Thompson, 9 T-5. Matt Duchene, 9 T-5. Tomas Hertl, 9 T-5. Evander Kane, 9 T-5. Adrian Kempe, 9 T-5. Joe Pavelski, 9 T-5. Jason Robertson, 9 T-5. Brayden Schenn, 9 T-5. Tyler Seguin, 9 It's just one example we see from Kaprizov of a true superstar trait: The ability to elevate his game against the best opponents. Kaprizov, Most Career Goals Per Game vs. Any Team, Career 1. Columbus Blue Jackets, 1.25 (10 GP) 2. Boston Bruins, 1.20 (5 GP) 3. Tampa Bay Lightning, 1.00 (7 GP) 4. Buffalo Sabres, 0.86 (7 GP) 5. Detroit Red Wings, 0.83 (7 GP) T-6. Vancouver Canucks, 0.75 (12 GP) T-6. Carolina Hurricanes, 0.75 (8 GP) T-6. Pittsburgh Penguins, 0.75 (8 GP) 9. Colorado Avalanche, 0.74 (19 GP) 10. Dallas Stars, 0.73 (11 GP) Of the 10 teams against which Kaprizov scored at the highest rate, the four in bold are the ones that've gone to the Conference Finals during that time. Predictably, the highest-scoring rates are against Eastern Conference teams, where the sample size is smaller, but a similar trend holds when we look only at the Western Conference. Kaprizov, Most Goals Per Game vs. Western Conference Teams, Career 1. Vancouver Canucks, 0.75 (12 GP) 2. Colorado Avalanche, 0.74 (19 GP) 3. Dallas Stars, 0.73 (11 GP) 4. Vegas Golden Knights, 0.65, (17 GP) 5. San Jose Sharks, 0.60 (20 GP) Again, we see Kaprizov putting up his biggest numbers against the best teams. The Avs, Stars, Golden Knights, and Edmonton Oilers are the only four teams to have gone to a Conference Final since Kaprizov entered the league, and Kaprizov has been able to show up against all four teams. Kaprizov vs. Colorado: 19 GP, 14 goals, 22 points Kaprizov vs. Dallas: 11 GP, 8 goals, 16 points Kaprizov vs. Edmonton: 14 GP, 1 goal, 14 points Kaprizov vs. Vegas: 17 GP, 11 goals, 16 points Kaprizov vs. WC Big 4: 61 GP, 34 goals, 68 points We're talking about a 46-goal, 91-point pace against these teams. You'd say that bodes well for Kaprizov in the playoffs, except, well, that Kaprizov's been about as dangerous a goal-scorer in the playoffs as anyone. He's had boom-or-bust series in the postseason, but there's no denying the overall picture, either. Goals Per Game, Playoffs, Since 2020-21 (minimum: 15 GP): 1. Nathan MacKinnon, 0.64 2. Adrian Kempe, 0.63 3. David Perron, 0.61 4. Kirill Kaprizov, 0.60 5. Chris Kreider, 0.56 6. Jake Guentzel, 0.55 7. Leon Draisaitl, 0.54 T-8. William Nylander, 0.50 T-8. David Pastrnak, 0.50 T-10. Brad Marchand, 0.49 T-10. Valeri Nichushkin, 0.49 No Wild fan needs to be told, "Kirill Kaprizov is good," of course. But as the question of "Did the Wild dramatically overpay for Kaprizov?" keeps bouncing around, it's games like this, against teams like the Avalanche, that show why he's priceless. There's no one else in Wild history that you can reliably expect to get a goal against top, top teams like the Avalanche, the Lightning, the Stars, and the Golden Knights. It's not close. Black Friday might be the day of discounts, but in the State of Hockey, it was a reminder of why the team decided to pay list price on their superstar.6 points
-
Unless the absolute no brainer trade for a Top 3 winger (or God forbid a top scoring center) is Yurov or Rossi, you're kinda boned either way. Rossi has all the potential in the world still, and I still don't see Yurov as am all around upgrade. I would rather Rossi and Yurov duke it out as 1 and 2 until one of the either or them or Ek have to be moved for money reasons. If for some insane reason McDavid chose the Wild over the other 30, sure. But he won't. Teams aren't trading their best players. They keep getting signed up. Nothing is saying we can't roll with Rossi, Yurov, and Ek until one or all of them ask for $10m. Whatever give trade is out there should be balanced out by "center depth? On the Wild? When does that ever happen? Banking on Yurov (and his woeful faceoff %) to be the guy after 20 games is dumb, when Rossi has 2-3 seasons of similar or better play under his belt. Yurov should be Hartman's replacement, not Rossi's.6 points
-
While it makes sense to look at the season as a whole, the Wild were incorporating several new players and looked very different the first 9 games. While one shouldn't extrapolate from only a hot streak, most of this Wild team did lead the NHL in the Standings for a short time last December. If you did toss out the first 9 games, the Wild playoff chances would look substantially better. Hopefully they can avoid the season-changing injuries they've experienced in prior years. The Avalanche game should be interesting. Go Wild!!!6 points
-
Boldy sure as hell seems to be stepping up into 1B territory this year. Faber has picked up his offense like crazy. He's not even supposed to be the PPG kinda guy, but is on fire. Do I trust Johansson or Zuccarello as bonafide Top 6 for good? Not really, but they are doing it on the cheap, and doing it far better than Tarasenko. I wish Buium popped a bit more offensively, but I still think he also makes up for Chisholm and Merrill. His mistakes aren't completely killing the team like they were early. Yurov is the key here. If he can stay where he is or get better, you can with play him 2nd line behind Rossi or make a viable 3rd with Trenin and Foligno. I don't see Yurov as better than Rossi or Ek...yet, but it really depends just how crazy the 2nd line stays. There's no way in hell Vancouver or Nashville parts with anything good (i.e. Petterson, Forsberg, or Josi). The waiting game begins on how long other teams hold out on their own Top 6 guys. Hartman, Bogo, and Tarasenko sure won't fetch a Kyrou, Tuch, or anyone worth the upgrade. But defense and goaltending win games. Kap and Boldy get 1-2 points on their own per games. Get the 3rd point or hold teams to 2, the Wild will usually win out.6 points
-
There’s no one-size-fits-all approach when it comes to winning in the NHL. While there are lots of ways to win a hockey game, the best teams in the league generally have a well-developed identity. The Florida Panthers are relentless forecheckers with total buy-in from every player; the Colorado Avalanche blitz with pace and puck possession. The Minnesota Wild kind of lacked an identity until they started winning. With the duo of Filip Gustavsson and Jesper Wallstedt, Minnesota is becoming a team built on a high-end goaltending battery. Wallstedt is the league’s hottest goaltender, with three shutouts in his last four starts. Gustavsson has responded by also playing his best hockey of the season, with a .921 save percentage since the start of November. The hot streak by both goaltenders has been the driving force behind the Wild going 9-1-1 this month and turning around a difficult start to the season. Two goaltenders playing so well could lead to a few outcomes. There may be some calls to trade one of the goalies while they’re at peak value. There could be a goaltending controversy over who becomes the clear starter. Or you could also have two good goalies. With Wallstedt and Gustavsson on team-friendly contracts, the best option is for the Wild to have two high-end starters. Thankfully, John Hynes seems bullish on going with a rotation. "Right now, the way both guys are playing is for sure. That’s what we’ve done for the last few games. I would anticipate that moving forward," Hynes said. "I think there might be opportunities and stretches in the season where you possibly could ride one guy a little bit more than the other. But the way our two guys are playing and competing, it looks like a good recipe right now." The duo also agrees that their high-quality play is pushing them to be better. Jesper Wallstedt reflected on the dynamic recently, saying that it’s been a positive development for both of their games. “It makes both goalies compete, and both goalies get better from it, I think," Wallstedt said. "I think if both want to play as much as possible and kind of make the other one play a little less, I think that’s a healthy competition, and obviously, I know my role a little more coming into this year.” That healthy competition has obviously worked wonders for the duo. We’re looking at stats from a small sample size, but they don’t even scratch the surface of just how dominant the duo has been. Since November 1, the Wild lead the league in 5-on-5 save percentage with their goalies saving 96.53% of shots on goal. They’re second in the league in that stretch in high danger save percentage with an 88.89% mark. That accomplishment is especially impressive considering the Wild are giving up 26.56 scoring chances against per game, which is 12th-most in the league. In that same time frame, Wallstedt leads the NHL in GSAA/60 (1.52) while Gustavsson places 18th (.38) out of the 73 goalies who have made more than one start. They’re also both top 20 high-danger saves per 60 with Gustavsson in 14th place (6.87) and Jesper Wallstedt in 18th (6.65). Of course, Minnesota’s goaltending in the last month is challenging to count on long-term. Wallstedt isn’t going to continue shutting out three of every four opponents he faces. There’s a difference between a goaltending hot streak and being difficult to score against being a franchise’s defining identity. That identity comes when a team pairs strong goaltending with a stifling defensive structure that supports sustained success in limiting scoring. Fortunately, that’s perfect for the Wild. Minnesota has always been at its best when playing defensively sound hockey. Since the 2022-23 season, the Wild have surrendered the 3rd-least high-danger chances against (2645) in the league while ranking 11th-lowest in high-danger chances for (2851). Minnesota also ranks 3rd in expected goals against per game (2.79) and is a bottom-ten team in expected goals for per game (2.95). It may not be the most exciting brand of hockey, but the Wild are clearly constructed to limit chances and play the dreaded “low-event” style. Still, while it may not be glamorous, it’s actually the perfect fit for a team that is leaning into an identity as hard to score against, with two elite goaltenders. It’s a formula that has produced positive results in the past, especially for teams that need to get as much as they can out of a roster with limited scoring ability. The best example of a template the Wild could follow is emulating the success of the Barry Trotz-era New York Islanders. From 2018-19 through 2020-21, the Islanders were one of the best teams in the NHL. They reached the conference finals twice, including a Game 7 against the eventual champion Tampa Bay Lightning in 2020-21. New York’s calling card was low-event hockey with potent goaltending duos. During that time, the Islanders led the league in save percentage from their goaltenders and, like the Wild, ranked in the top ten in expected goals against per game (2.61) and in the bottom ten in expected goals for per game (2.65). The Islanders achieved that defensive excellence with sterling goaltending duos, including Robin Lehner and Thomas Greiss, Semyon Varlamov and Thomas Greiss, and Semyon Varlamov and Ilya Sorokin. During that time, every goalie had a positive goals saved above average rating, and none started more than 45 games in a season at any point in the stretch. While they never reached the Stanley Cup finals, the Islanders clearly delivered strong results and were a tough team to play against every time they took the ice. In the past, the Wild have played that low-event style, but haven’t gotten good enough goaltending to follow through on it fully. That’s the issue with playing slow hockey. When you’re giving up goals and can’t keep up with scoring, it’s a bad recipe for winning. But that equation finally looks different now. With Wallstedt and Gustavsson giving Minnesota the goaltending this system has always required, the Wild can finally commit to the identity of being a goalie team.6 points
-
Not to take anything away from the goalies as they deserve all the praise they are getting, but I really like how our defense has changed since the beginning of the season. We are no longer turning the puck over in our defensive zone. Single attackers have not muscled us off the puck in our own zone in several games. We have not allowed more than a few high-danger chances per game in this winning stretch. Makes the goalies job much easier. If we can keep this up, it should be an interested remainder of the season.6 points
-
6 points
-
Old man feebly yells at sky. Looks to bring in another 35yr old reclamation project instead of developing player. Water is wet. Welcome to OCL and GMBG's vision of full seats on another first round exit.6 points
-
BOO!!! Rossi only needs to outlast Silly G. in the organization... hopefully that happens!6 points


