Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation since 10/21/2024 in all areas

  1. We're dinging Marco Rossi for playing well with Kaprizov, now? Isn't that what we've wanted a center to do?
    13 points
  2. The opinions of Sam do not reflect Hockey Wilderness' position on Flyers fans posting.
    9 points
  3. Typical my ass. The Wild have to actually make the playoffs to do anything. Building for the playoffs was what Nashville tried to do by making a huge splash in free agency: tell me how that's worked for them so far? Keep losing like they have, then fuck the "big bad playoff" plan. Rossi is winning the team games, so forgive me for taking games as they come and not tripping over myself talking about games that haven't and may not happen yet. Tell me again what team is 2nd in the division playing Rossi on the first line? Oh yeah, the Wild. It's working, and I'm pleased. Call me typical or a doomer all you want: at least I know a winning team in the moment and can appreciate it.
    9 points
  4. Sure, Johansson is good at skating the puck across the blue line and immediately turning it over to the other team. I'm not sure that brings a lot of value to the Wild, but it truly is a skill he possesses.
    9 points
  5. I think you are the one who proposed putting Hartman on the 2nd line in place of Nojo. Seems like a no brainer to me. Also, Trenin would do better on the 3rd with Foligno and Freddy. Nojo goes to the 4th line and either sinks or swims.
    9 points
  6. Stramel was also able to add a goal and an assist in an 8-3 beat down of Notre Dame over the weekend, moving his point total to 8 in 10 games played. Substantial improvement considering Stramel had exactly the same number of goals(3) and assists(5) in 34 games last season!
    8 points
  7. I'm not familiar with The Athletic's Sean McIndoe, who ranks the Wild just outside of the top 5, primarily because they were not a playoff team last year. The last part of his writing is what I wanted to share. Add Buium, Yurov, and a free agent addition to a Kaprizov extension, and they could become that contender they haven't been for much of their history.
    8 points
  8. Chicago should worry about Bedard wanting to move to Minnesota.
    8 points
  9. Hey guys...wanna say Rossi is just a passenger anymore?
    8 points
  10. Rossi’s getting $5.5M AAV at a minimum. Those dreaming he’s coming in at below $4 M get ready for a reality check. He’s steadily getting better and he’s getting his money. His agent will see to that. He’s a top 10 pick first round center. My guess is he’s already turned down the Wild’s low end offer. What’s puzzling is the vibe I get that BG doesn’t like the player he is. What’s not to like? He’s motivated, a hard worker, goes into the corners and is fearless in front of the net. He’s also extremely skilled, has a high hockey IQ and anticipates plays with the best of them. I promise you I’m not his agent, just an impressed fan.
    8 points
  11. It's less money than Matt Beniers just got. Less than Elias Lindholm's deal. It will almost certainly be lower than what Sam Bennett is going to get from Florida. Hell, it's barely more than Chandler Stephenson just got this summer. I think if you pay Rossi like a 2C now it pays off huge.
    8 points
  12. Nice thing is he’s 5 years from his 28th birthday. That’s when most players hit their prime. That makes me very happy.
    7 points
  13. You want to remove one of the best skating players that plays strong defense with a good skating forward that has no defensive IQ? Sounds like you are wanting to make the Wild PP equal opportunity for the opposition to score. That'd be an excellent way to hang the goalies out to dry for short handed goals.
    7 points
  14. We wrote about Kirill Kaprizov's incredible start on Thursday. Still, when a player goes out and drops a three-point night to extend their multi-point game streak to seven... what else can you do but marvel about him all over again? Kaprizov is refusing to slow down, adding two goals and an assist in the Minnesota Wild's 5-3 victory over the Tampa Bay Lightning. The effort bumped Kaprizov back into the NHL lead in points (21), extended his multi-point game streak to seven, and gave Minnesota their sixth win in the past seven games. We have to add an addendum to Thursday's piece concerning Kaprizov's start: "Dolla Bill Kirill" is tied with Leon Draisaitl (2021-22) and Thomas Vanek (2013-14) for the fourth-most points through 10 games in the Salary Cap Era. Only Draisaitl and Connor McDavid have had more. Look further down the list, and you'll see titans of the game like Evgeni Malkin and Sidney Crosby looking up at Kaprizov. That boggles the mind, and Kaprizov's hot start registers as incredible, even for someone who has spent years watching Malkin and Crosby night in and night out. "I think it just proves how good he is, how special he is," Bill Guerin marveled to Hockey Wilderness following Kaprizov's three-point outing. "You don't just do that by accident, either. You see good players get off to strong starts and things like that, but... 10 games, that's a good-sized segment. So have that, not just consistency, but high-level and produce like that is amazing." No one could ever accuse Kaprizov of flying under the radar. People have considered him among the NHL's most dynamic wingers since entering the league. Still, he seems to be garnering a new level of attention league-wide this season. Sportsnet's Elliotte Friedman pinpointed him as a Hart Trophy contender two weeks ago. The Athletic's Dom Luszczyszyn and Sean Gentille recently floated a trial balloon take that Kaprizov may have surpassed last season's Hart runner-up Nikita Kucherov as the league's best winger. And why not? It shouldn't be lost on anyone that Kaprizov's two-goal, one-assist game on Friday is an identical stat line to his October 24 showing at Tampa Bay. In head-to-heads, Kaprizov has a 6-2 point advantage over his countryman Kucherov. If we want to keep comparing the two superstar Russians, we can point out that Kaprizov's seventh-straight multi-point game matches Kucherov's career-high streak. The two are tied for the fourth-longest such streak of the Salary Cap Era. Stamkos, McDavid, and Vincent Lecavalier are the only players who can claim a longer one... and if Kaprizov extends his to eight games on Sunday night, that list of players goes down to one. Kaprizov's six power-play points tied him for seventh in the NHL, and he's been even better at 5-on-5 play. His 12 points at 5-on-5 sit on top of the NHL (along with Sam Reinhart), and it's gone a long way to his 14-4 scoring advantage over his opponents when he's on the ice. Only Reinhart is enjoying a higher 5-on-5 goal differential than Kaprizov's plus-10. At this point, what else can you say? Wild fans are watching the best player in franchise history at the height of his powers, and he's putting the rest of the hockey world on notice. It's been a treat to watch, and while 10 games is a good chunk of the season, we've got a lot of time left for Kaprizov to amaze us even more.
    7 points
  15. Kirill and Ek are two players with an incredible desire to win. Both are making the players around them better. Sure is fun to watch. Inspiring an entire team to be better.
    7 points
  16. I said it the other day. Rossi should get a nice extension with no special clauses to accompany the deal. I would have hated getting Laine the injury-prone, primadonna, head-case. Thank goodness his ego and attitude closed the door on GMBG. Talk about dodging a bullet. Guerin should be ashamed. Rossi turned it up a notch and has been solid. Get him extended. Forget about trading him. Cross-eyed Bill does owe Rossi a solid contract, he's earned it and proven he's valuable. He's also making Guerin look stupid so enjoy that part TMooch.
    7 points
  17. KK97 is on pace for 152 points, nearly 2 PPG pace. Rossi is a PPG player as 1C. Keep Rossi where he is and let them cook. And pay Rossi what he's worth: no trades, no offer sheets. Kap has always been good, but he's at another level this year. If size is really required, swap Ek and Rossi. Kap may not score as much, but Rossi and Boldy will make up for it...
    7 points
  18. Exactly. Again, aside from potential centers what exactly do the Wild have? Has Rossi done anything but demonstrate he will continue to improve and be the best player he can be?
    7 points
  19. 7 points
  20. If Rossi ends up scoring 60-65 points in a second season with how little PP time he gets, you keep him and pay him and act as if Yurov isn't some second coming until he proves it like Rossi just did.
    7 points
  21. Some of what you said is somewhat true but do you remember what line he was on last year when he scored 21 goals and 40 some points as a rookie? I believe he was one of the highest scoring rookies the Wild has ever had. Another noteworthy stat was he was 2nd on the team last year in 5v5 points. You didn’t seem to know that by your comments. As a 2nd year player he’s doing fantastic. The kid has fantastic potential and he’s been showing it for a while now . On a Stanley Cup team he’s not a first line C but he hasn’t even entered the start of his prime years.
    7 points
  22. Rossi had as many 5-on-5 goals as Brock Boeser and Matt Boldy last year, it doesn't surprise me in the least that he's been productive this year.
    7 points
  23. I'm sold on him too. He's chippy, he goes into the corners, he fights for position in front of the net, has good vision...
    7 points
  24. Even if the Wild aren't totally sold on him, sign him to a 2 year bridge deal to at least get some cost certainty. Personally I'm sold on Rossi already so I feel they should offer him a 5-7 year deal right now.
    7 points
  25. Gus is deserving of at least one shut-out so far this year.
    7 points
  26. I don't think they've even hit their stride yet. Some plays look a little disjointed, lots of missed opportunities. Will be fun to watch as chemistry grows.
    7 points
  27. The Minnesota Wild's most controversial offseason move wasn't a free agent signing, a trade, or a draft pick. Even if the Wild had the resources to make such a splash, a move like the rumored Patrik Laine trade may still have taken a backseat to a simple lineup card change. John Hynes almost rode his top line of Kirill Kaprizov, Joel Eriksson Ek, and Matt Boldy to the playoffs. Playing 375 minutes -- almost all down the stretch -- these three out-scored opponents by a 30 to 18 margin. That plus-12 goal differential was tied with the Toronto Maple Leafs' Auston Matthews - Mitch Marner - Matthew Knies line and the Vancouver Canucks' Brock Boeser - J.T. Miller - Pius Suter line for the ninth-best mark in the NHL. That line was such a cheat code that it seemed unthinkable to break it up, even for lineup balance. But Hynes did, moving Eriksson Ek and Boldy to their own line, then ultimately placing 2020 first-rounder Marco Rossi in the top spot between Kaprizov and winger Mats Zuccarello. On one hand, Rossi was a highly-touted prospect the Wild likely drafted to handle this exact role. On the other hand, the Wild never seemed to warm up to him fully. Even though he scored 21 goals as a rookie, they didn't seem to see Rossi's ceiling as a top-line center. He had a big opportunity to keep proving his worth. Rossi might be soft-spoken, but his first five games have made a huge statement. His five points have him tied with Zuccarello for third on the team, behind only Kaprizov (eight) and Boldy (six). All five of his points have come at 5-on-5, where he sits in sole possession of the team lead. Rossi entered Sunday tied for the eighth-most 5-on-5 points in the NHL. There are only two other centers ahead of him: the Vegas Golden Knights' Jack Eichel and the Florida Panthers' Sam Reinhart -- and Reinhart only plays the pivot part-time. The secret to Rossi's success? It's more of the same stuff that led to his breakout last year -- and mirrors what led to Eriksson Ek's rise as a goal-scoring presence in the NHL. He can go to the net, find the soft spots in the defense, and good things happen. Look at his shot map (courtesy of Evolving-Hockey), and you'll find that nine of his 12 shot attempts at 5-on-5 have come within 20 feet of the net. Six of them have come within 11 feet or fewer. However you want to measure it, Rossi is getting high-quality chances at 5-on-5 unlike anyone else on the team and few in the NHL. Natural Stat Trick has him tied for tenth in the NHL with nine high-danger shot attempts at 5-on-5, which matches totals from Eichel, Nikita Kucherov, and Mikko Rantanen. Evolving-Hockey has him in the team lead with 1.90 expected goals in all situations, not just 5-on-5. That's more than Kaprizov and Boldy, despite getting fewer minutes and half the power play time. That's impressive, but so is Rossi's performance as a cohesive member of the top line. So far, the trio has out-scored opponents by a 5-to-1 margin at 5-on-5, and while scoring 83% of the goals or so won't continue, their controlling 58.6% of the expected goals share should keep them firmly in the positive. They're also carrying over their success from last season when they out-scored opponents 19 to 13 at 5-on-5. Add that all up, and this top line is up 24 to 14 -- a 63.2% of the goal share that actually (and slightly) bests the Kaprizov - Eriksson Ek - Boldy line from last season (62.5%). You aren't likely to see Rossi do the Holy Nordy, did you see that?! kind of plays that Kaprizov and Boldy make, at least not yet. But he's so good at doing small things to keep plays alive, whether it's his positioning, winning board battles, or making a heads-up play to keep the puck in the offensive zone. Watch Rossi's goal against St. Louis, only don't pay attention to the end of the play. Look at everything he does before Kaprizov puts the puck on his stick. He pressures Colton Parayko and forces him to dump the puck along the boards to Nick Leddy, who promptly turns it over to Kaprizov. It takes Rossi no time to change directions and get into a shooting position, which he stays in. He hangs in a soft spot nine feet from the net, where he's untouched. Elite hockey sense is going to get you a lot of goals that look almost effortless. In some senses, this is five games, a small sample size. At the same time, the Wild drafted Rossi to be a scoring center, and he had that pedigree at juniors and the AHL. He had success with this line last season, and it's unsurprising if he made a major leap in the offseason, considering the tremendous growth he showed after the summer of 2023. We may be watching a legit Top-Line Center taking his final form right before our eyes.
    7 points
  28. Boldy commenting on playing with JEE and Kaprizov. I imagine when your other winger changes from Johansson to Kaprizov, it's extremely exciting!
    6 points
  29. What future is now? The team missed the fucking playoffs last year. If the team had some sustained yearly 2nd or 3rd round playoff success, I'd be all for risking everything. They aren't, and may never be there. You're very hung up on the Kap thing, acting as if one shiny toy is going to make them playoff contenders or keep him here. This has been a promising start to the season. That's all it is. I'm not going to go out of my way to change the trajectory of the team on a whim. That's what Fletchers do.
    6 points
  30. I liked what I saw last game too. He isn't NHL ready yet but he showed a few little glimpses. He might be another one of our young players that struggle with the confidence part. I'm way more optimistic now than before he went to Iowa.
    6 points
  31. I disagree with Justin's comparables here. Granny and Zucker are not even close to the type of player that Ohgren is, and possible points should not be the comparison. Ohgren is far more close in style to Nino. Sure he may score more points than Nino, but his value is in the 200' game and digging things out in the corners. He's far more physical than both Granny and Zucker, though, on Saturday, he flashed Zucker type speed when closing on a Star. Now, as for development, in the time he was sent down and brought back up, I noticed a little more freedom from him as the rumors of him putting a lot of pressure on himself may have been true. I saw NHL quality board battle, NHL quality speed, yet AHL quality stick work which is his greatest area of improvement which is needed. If I were coaching him in Iowa, I'd be asking him to stay late and shoot on Vaj a little extra and double up on the stick handling drills. What it looks like is he plays too fast for his stick right now and the hands just need to catch up.
    6 points
  32. I think a lot of people saw the future value in that deal. We wanted to see Boldy take another step and other than his golf-Summer, he's done that. There's still playoffs and game-takeover qualities we wanna see but his start this year makes us forget about his amateur PGA to hockey season start last year. It sucks Ek keeps getting hurt and NoJo sucks. If Boldy was on the Wild's first or second line with better guys, 75-85 points wouldn't be a problem. What is the line next year was Rossi, Boldy, Yurov? Ek, Zuccy, Kaprizov. Hartman, Ogie, Foligno. Certainly looks like MN has a good track for the playoffs and assets to acquire a player at the deadline for sure. They have a lot of talent and potential to upgrade. Gus has been awesome again. It's the NoJo element holding Boldy back. That remains the biggest mystery. What they see making him a mainstay with Boldy.
    6 points
  33. My main concern is why get rid of any of them? Rossi gets you 2nd line scoring center or 3rd line C controlled mix of offense and defense at minimum, and you can just have Kap/Ek/Boldy wrecking things if you want to go that route. There's nothing wrong with Rossi at 2C/3C getting 40-60 pts on a reasonable deal. If Zeev is as good as people say he is, you have a potential game breaking offensive defenseman, or at worst, you have a 2nd two-way stud in Faber...fucking hell. Either result would be nice. Yurov is an unknown, just like Zeev is. He could be anything from a 1C, 2W, or 2C. Or, he can just shit the bed first time out like Ohgren did. The idea to throw away a proven NHL quality player with some high end scoring potential because you "can't find room" or "can find someone better" is silly. You know Rossi can hang in the NHL. He and Faber were the only two guys last year who played all 82 games (if I remember right). You don't know what another player on another team is going to do in our system, and you don't know if Zeev or Yurov just end up like Addison and Beckman. Sure, signs point to Zeev and Yurov being top line guys. Why sacrifice Rossi just because Hartman is a more versatile player? So what if Rossi can only play C? You get a high end offensive skillset that "may" flame out, but he's already done more at this level for this team than anyone he'd be traded for. If it turns out all three are as advertised, fuck free agency. Fuck any other prospects. Fuck the veterans. The Wild got the new infusion of players they needed and you pay them to do what any high priced free agent can do.
    6 points
  34. Just looked this up again to be sure, but Rossi is tied for 28th in "Centers" (NHL stats site with said filter) with 13 points. Wanna know who is 20? Crosby at 16 points. Top 10 guys are around 17-20...so the margin between bonafide top tier guys on $7-10m contracts and a vilified total trade bait passenger on an ELC is three goddamn points. Sorry if I'm not sold on the "he's not good enough and must be traded" assertion.
    6 points
  35. I appreciate the diversity of opinion here. If we all had the same takes, it would be a pretty dull forum. Fortunately, we are all just spectators and cant influence management of the team (as much as we would like to sometimes). I for one think Rossi is doing well at his position. Could it be better? Of course. Would some extra size and speed be helpful? Yep. I wouldn't be sad at all if we held onto him, I think he is still growing as a player. That being said, if we trade him to get the perfect piece for the team, I'm down. Cheers to all.
    6 points
  36. Also, this isn't just Kap helping people play better. Hynes wanted balance and everyone but Mojo is showing it. Rossi also scored a goal against an otherwise killer Florida team and the lone assist against the Jets. He's doing his job against harder teams too.
    6 points
  37. You should bet on Rossi, because he's done all this with a fraction of the PP time Ek and Boldy, and Zucc get. He's going to have up and down games, but so have those above players. All but one player in the top-6 has been a PP or close player, so I'd love to know what more tough love Rossi needs before it gets tiresome and vers into comedy.
    6 points
  38. In hockey, you often ride the hot hand. Great chemistry between players is rarely the result of struggling and then finding a breakthrough. Usually, you have it or you don't, and once you have it, coaches are loathe to give it up. So it's a bit eyebrow-raising that on Sunday, John Hynes broke up his productive top line for the second consecutive game, swapping center Marco Rossi onto a lower line. In isolation, neither change should have stood out. Hynes flipped Rossi with fourth-line center Marat Khusnutdinov for a few shifts at the tail end of the second period in Friday's game at the Anaheim Ducks. Coaches send players, especially young ones, messages all the time. It happens. Rossi responded with a goal and assist in the third period; the Wild won, and everyone seemed to move on. Even on Sunday, the Wild needed a goal to tie and loaded up their top line with Kirill Kaprizov, Matt Boldy, and Joel Eriksson Ek. You can't blame a coach for doing that, especially when it netted them the goal that forced overtime. But after Sunday's game, The Athletic's Michael Russo wrote about Hynes' dissatisfaction with Rossi's consistency. "[Hynes] knows Rossi's getting points but feels like his game's been up and down. For instance, after taking three penalties in a four-game stretch, Hynes thought Rossi was good in San Jose. But in Anaheim, Hynes felt Rossi needed to be harder on plays and manage the puck better." Rossi's 23, and his game is still developing, so learning moments will happen. Ideally, Hynes sends his message, and the extremely driven center works to clean up those mistakes and continues his terrific start to the season. But also... hopefully, Rossi's leash doesn't stay this short because his season has been extremely consistent. The top line of Kaprizov, Rossi, and Mats Zuccarello has outscored opponents by a 12-6 margin at 5-on-5 this season. Looking at Rossi himself, he's only been outscored at 5-on-5 in three of their 15 games and got the better of the expected goals share in 10 of 15 games. Say what you want, but that feels pretty consistent. Then there's the offensive output, arguably more consistent than any other forward on the team not named "Kaprizov." Rossi entered Tuesday with 12 even-strength points (tied for 13th in the NHL) and 4.51 individual expected goals (tied for 11th). Looking at the game logs, we can see how steadily he's generated chances night after night. Here's the number of his individual xG for each game and how they ranked among Wild forwards on that night: Game 1: 0.09 (6th) Game 2: 0.48 (2nd) Game 3: 0.26 (3rd) Game 4: 0.29 (3rd) Game 5: 0.73 (1st) Game 6: 0.08 (6th) Game 7: 0.07 (3rd) Game 8: 0.07 (6th) Game 9: 0.27 (2nd) Game 10: 0.69 (1st) Game 11: 0.18 (5th) Game 12: 0.02 (4th) Game 13: 0.57 (1st) Game 14: 0.50 (1st) Game 15: 0.22 (3rd) In bold is every game where Rossi had at least 0.20 expected goals at even-strength and finished the night in the top three among Wild forwards. That number is nine of 15 games. Compare that to, say, Boldy, who has had just five such games in 15 efforts, and we can get a good sense of how consistent Rossi has been. Now, points aren't everything, and neither are scoring chances. But on a team tied for 27th with 2.25 expected goals per hour at 5-on-5, you've got to take the offense you can get, even if those offensive players are prone to an extra mistake or lapse. Rossi's play should earn him the same benefit of the doubt that gets extended to less impactful players (whom I'm sure you can name in the comments). To be fair, there's a balancing act in this -- how much do you prioritize imparting a lesson during a player's growing pains versus not throwing out prospects with the Zamboni water -- and to his credit, Hynes hasn't made any missteps yet. But it can be tricky, and Hynes needs to navigate these waters carefully to enhance the growth in his budding center's game without derailing his (or the top line's) success.
    6 points
  39. This is impossible because we signed Hartman, Foligno and Zuccy to extensions. Or so I've been told.
    6 points
  40. Spurgeon looked solid against Toronto. I like his improvement game over game. I have optimism that he will return to his former self. Great to watch. His overtime play was fantastic. He still has speed and awareness. If he can stay in the lineup he will add a lot to our D-core this year.
    6 points
  41. Just like CS, I think being reasonably healthy is the main thing and the red flag here is that depth is not their strong suit especially at forward. I like the way the team is blocking shots and packing the middle of the ice. The red flag here, however, is that sometimes blocked shots lead to injuries. This season's version of the Wild has been to counter score quickly when someone else takes the lead. The red flag here is if this is sustainable? Last season, we had a terrible time scoring 1st. This season seems to be different in that respect, and I think it should be a stressed goal. It is always easier to play with a lead, something that adds confidence to the team and cuts down on injuries. I don't mention the stats here, nor the underlying numbers. It's not that I don't believe in them, it's just that right now, the eye test is much better. The numbers are to goofy this early to mean anything. Another flag, I'm not sure what color it is, is that our schedule to this point has been Eastern Conference heavy. To me, the Eastern Conference is probably the better conference at this time. Banking points against those teams is very good. You could say something similar about our road/home ratio too. Coming up big in that long 7 game road trip probably puts us in the playoff hunt with 5 games to go. I think it is still way too early to believe anybody's % on playoff odds. I said this a little while ago, but you cannot make the playoffs with a good October and November. However, you can miss the playoffs with these as bad months. Just like in a game, chasing teams ahead in the standings is far more exhausting than having the lead. The banked points can actually help you stay within yourself and not try to do too much, keeping you healthier. My biggest red flag, though, is what happens when Kaprizov isn't scoring 2 or more points a night? We've enjoyed 7 in a row. This, to me, is the greatest reason for our record. We need to have improvement throughout the other lines so that they can provide the vital secondary scoring. One last item. Hynes. Last night and on some previous nights, Heinzy makes some very subtle line switches through the game. Sometimes it's dictated by special teams screwing up the lines, but moving Trenin to 4th line and elevating Hartman to 3rd line worked well. So did Rossi moving late to Boldy's line. In comparing this with Evason, he didn't really do this. Hynes hasn't hit the line blender as much as Boudreau, but he has a feel that shouldn't go unnoticed. He won't get every switch right, but I do applaud him for doing it.
    6 points
  42. You can't take October away from the Minnesota Wild. John Hynes emphasized the need for a fast start for his team after coming onto the job mid-season once the Wild stumbled to a 5-10-4 record. As Banner from "Arrested Development" once infamously read... Nine games into the season, the Wild have a 6-1-2 record. They have as many points in the standings (14) as they had through 19 games under Dean Evason last year. Those points are in the bank, and if we're using the playoff cutoff from last year (98), Minnesota is already 14% of the way to the playoffs with about 90% of the season to go. But this is a sports team in Minnesota; it's the land of 10,000 Shoes To Drop. If you're a pessimist, there's no shortage of red flags for this Wild team. It might surprise you that the Wild's opponents are outshooting them at 5-on-5 this season (200 to 201). In terms of overall shot attempts, Minnesota's also well below 50% (392 to 445) and is only barely on top in terms of expected goals (16.0 to 14.5). You can get out-shot, out-attempted, and even out-chanced and still make the playoffs. The Washington Capitals did it last year, and their numbers were worse than Minnesota's. But it's tough. You need killer special teams, some mojo that doesn't run out in the regular season, or, preferably, both. And even then, your luck tends to run out come playoff time. The Wild have both things on their side right now. They've got a top-10 power play, the fifth-highest shooting percentage at 5-on-5 (11.5%), and the fourth-highest save percentage (93.5%). That works out to a PDO (shooting plus save percentages) of 105.0, the third-highest in the NHL. Teams at the extreme ends of the PDO spectrum tend to regress to the league average of 100. So what happens when things start to break the other way? The Wild might have the classic red flags of a team that will regress, but there's reason to think it might not be so bad. As always, we're dealing with some small sample sizes that produce weird results in the early part of the season. In this case, events have conspired to make Minnesota's underlying numbers look worse. Remember, the Wild went their first six games without trailing. They've trailed for only 45 minutes and 50 seconds this season, the lowest amount in the league. Only the Vegas Golden Knights have spent more time in the lead. This is where score effects come in. Teams in the lead tend to hang back and settle for defending, while the trailing team pushes to create more offense. Over a full season, when most teams spend about 1000 minutes or more leading and trailing, these effects tend to make only a minor impact. But when we're talking, say... nine games, for example... these score effects can skew things significantly. We're seeing that with the Wild right now. Let's take a look at what the Wild's 5-on-5 possession numbers are before and after adjusting for score effects, which Evolving-Hockey helpfully does: Corsi For Percentage: Unadjusted: 46.8% (25th in NHL) Adjusted: 50.2% (21st) Shots For Percentage: Unadjusted: 49.9% (18th) Adjusted: 52.6% (9th) Expected Goals Percentage: Unadjusted: 50.8% (13th) Adjusted: 53.1 (9th) Once those score effects are accounted for, Minnesota looks much more solid. The Wild pop over 50.2% at controlling shot attempts. However, they have built a reputation for dominating shot quality for over a decade. Once we account for score effects, they're doing it again, and that's very good news for the State of Hockey. Last season, nine of the top-10 teams in (score-adjusted) Expected Goals Percentage at 5-on-5 made the playoffs. Over the last 10 full 82-game seasons, 85 of the 100 teams in the top-10 of Expected Goals Percentage made the playoffs. Better yet, they've done it while missing six games from Jared Spurgeon, their best 5-on-5 player last year (57.8% xGF%). Having Spurgeon back and healthy raises the ceiling for their season. These reasons and the points the Wild have already banked are why Evolving-Hockey projects them to have a 79.9% chance of making the playoffs. There will be times when the shooting goes cold, the goaltending gets a bit leaky, and the power play slumps. Still, Minnesota (when healthy) has enough going for it to believe that it will make the playoffs.
    6 points
  43. Middleton was one of the players who needed a bounce back. The fact that he went from near worst in +/- last year with only Freddy being worse, to being tied at +5 or +6 (I think +6) tied with Kap is pretty telling. It is becoming clearer week by week that the supposed Iowa defenders are years away from meaningful action or hope of unseating the top-4. I supported the extension because the Wild needed Top-4 quality guys due to Brodin and Spurgeon aging out eventually. With Buium really the only elite level prospect, the options were to keep Middleton or pay an arm and a leg via trade or free agency. Middleton DIDN'T cost an arm and a leg, and has done pretty damn well in the first set of games. Sometimes, it's further evidence that GMs and coaches..."probably" know hockey and its players better than we do. Shock I know.
    6 points
  44. Pay the man his money. I love how we act like we have too many centers based upon what prospects may or may not turn out. Gamethread?
    6 points
  45. Marat is showing glimpses of talent, but no way swapping him with Rossi gets the same result. While ideally Rossi isn't our fix at 1C, and probably isn't a $7m player, he's showing he creates scoring and is not just on coattails. I'd do everything I could to keep him via a mid-range bridge contract ~$5m. He's taken the feedback. Bulked up. And continues to show very high hockey IQ that was advertised.
    6 points
  46. Pre-season, Evolving-Hockey projected him at 7-years; $5.7 AAV. I'd be comfortable doing that at $7 million today. Top-six; If Yurov's the shit, move Ek back to Line 3 and do backflips.
    6 points
  47. If you're looking for one piece of 20-year-old pop culture to describe the Minnesota Wild's start to the season, it's easily Michael Scott looking stone serious into the camera and declaring, "No question about it, I am ready to get hurt again." It's October 23, just six games into the season, but you can unironically look at this team and go, The Wild are a wagon. It's not even just you buying in on this. The media is in on them. The players are in on themselves. And, frankly, until they spend a second trailing on the scoreboard, why shouldn't they be? You can point to several reasons for the Wild's strong start. Their top two lines are out-scoring opponents at an 11-to-1 clip at 5-on-5 through six games. Minnesota's power play is just that: powerful, converting at a 33.3% clip that's fourth in the NHL. But the biggest reason is the guy between the pipes: Filip Gustavsson. The "Gus Bus" is traveling at a pace not seen since 1994, and he's not just kept Minnesota in games but has allowed them to win comfortably. Five starts in, and the 26-year-old goaltender still hasn't surrendered three or more goals in a game. His last four starts have seen him hold his opponents to one goal during regulation. We know a small sample size when we see one here at Hockey Wilderness, and yes, of course, these are small sample shenanigans. There are no .950 goalies in the NHL, and definitely not in recent years, where the league save percentage has dropped below .900. Still, it makes you wonder: Is the Gus Bus back? Can the Wild trust him to lead this team back to the postseason after being perhaps the biggest reason they missed last year? Five games isn't enough to determine that, but what about 85? That's the number of starts that Gustavsson has in a Wild uniform, and in those two-plus seasons, the Swedish netminder has put up some of the best numbers in the NHL. Here are the top-10 goalies (minimum 2000 minutes) in save percentage at that time: Linus Ullmark, .927 Connor Hellebuyck, .921 Jeremy Swayman, .917 Ilya Sorokin, .917 FILIP GUSTAVSSON, .917 Igor Shesterkin, .915 Joey Daccord, .914 Jake Oettinger, .914 Semyon Varlamov, .913 Juuse Saros, .912 That's good company. Really good company. The problem is that Gustavsson's numbers have oscillated between extremes. A .931 save percentage in 2022-23 is doing some heavy lifting for him, and his save percentage from last season drags him down. Hockey coaches value consistency, and Gustavsson's season-long slump devalues an otherwise top-10 goalie performance from the past several years. So it's not surprising to see Gustavsson on a heater early in the season. He's done it before, for longer. Until he proves he can be consistent, the question will always be whether he can limit the damage when things start going wrong. That was a huge problem last season. He was prone to bad showings and meltdowns, where Gustavsson lost his composure and control of the game. We can find several examples of this. Against the Toronto Maple Leafs on October 14, he surrendered three goals in 2 minutes, 20 seconds in the third period of a game where Minnesota lost 6-4. The Wild had to overcome a 3-0 first-period deficit on November 4 against the New York Rangers after he allowed three goals in the game's first seven minutes. They dropped two crucial divisional games to the Nashville Predators, with the game turning on a brief but impactful Gustavsson meltdown. On January 25, the Predators erased a 1-0 lead heading into the third period with two goals in 35 seconds. The Wild lost 3-2. How do you top that? By allowing two goals in eight seconds on February 29, which turned a one-goal lead in the first period to the spark for a 6-1 blowout. We're not seeing that this year, even in moments where Wild fans held their breath, waiting for things to unravel. In the St. Louis Blues game, Mathieu Joseph broke the scoring open with under 10 minutes left to make it 3-1. Minnesota turned the puck over a little over a minute later, and St. Louis took a 3-on-2 back Gustavsson's way. Robert Thomas, who had 26 goals and 86 points last season, shot the puck -- but Gustavsson deflected it. Crisis averted. He put out the fire. A similar dynamic happened in his second win against the Columbus Blue Jackets. He lost the shutout with 85 seconds left to make the game 3-1, but when Kirill Marchenko took the Jackets' last shot with 36 seconds to go, Gustavsson limited the damage. Last night in Florida, Sam Bennett got on the board in the middle of the second period, but Gustavsson shut the door completely in Minnesota's 5-1 win. As is often the case with the Wild, you have to give credit to their defense. They're allowing 1.8 expected goals per hour at 5-on-5, blocking shots, and making life much easier for Gustavsson. Then again, the Wild were the best team in hockey at suppressing expected goals last season, and look what that did for the Gus Bus, then. We can get caught up in recency bias, and just as easy as it was for the 2023-24 season to sour Wild fans on Gustavsson, this hot start could easily be coloring our feelings about him now. And even if the defense keeps being this stingy, and Gustavsson stays locked in, he won't be close to a .952 goalie at the end of the season. Still, it looks like he's figured out how to stop the bleeding when things go wrong, and his overall career save percentage is far from anything to sneeze at. You (and the Wild) can absolutely get hurt again, but it feels like it's time to go all-in on the Gus Bus.
    6 points
  48. Don't act like we don't already know this.
    6 points
×
×
  • Create New...