Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness
  • The Wild's Retool Was Never What We Thought It Was


    Image courtesy of Nick Wosika-USA TODAY Sports
    Tony Abbott

    It's hard to stay competitive in the NHL. It's hard to build a contending team. Doing both at the same time is almost impossible. That's why some were skeptical about Bill Guerin's strategy of building up the Minnesota Wild's prospect pool without trying to tank for the highest draft spots, or without recycling veterans into draft picks.

    Against all odds, though, Guerin's Wild are coming off back-to-back 100-point seasons while amassing a deep prospect pool that's on the cusp of making an impact. Marco Rossi, Brock Faber, and Calen Addison are looking to seize full-time spots. Carson Lambos, Sammy Walker, Adam Beckman, and David Spacek are waiting in the wings. And more is on the way.

    Until this week, this is how fans understood The Plan:

    Step 1) Make it through the Zach Parise/Ryan Suter buyout pain by retaining bargain players as best as they can.

    Step 2) Start reaping the rewards of the prospect pool just as they become able to...

    Step 3) Use newfound cap space to upgrade where necessary.

    That wasn't just the message the fans were interpreting from the front office's actions. The players themselves seemed to internalize this as being The Plan. In July, Jacob Middleton told an audience of Wild fans, "I would love to say [Minnesota can win a Stanley Cup] this year or the year after.... But when you look money that can be spent after the 2025 season, that's when pushes can be made to really go after a championship."

    Everything converged so neatly around the end of the Wild's Dead Cap Era that it really looked like a retool-on-the-fly was going to work to perfection.

    The only problem is that The Plan never existed. At least not the way most fans believed or hoped it would. Part of the negative reaction to this week's extensions for Mats Zuccarello and Marcus Foligno was the idea that they were a betrayal of the front office's long-term vision for the future. They weren't. Treating Zuccarello, Foligno, and soon, we're told, Ryan Hartman as core members of this team is what they had in mind.

    Guerin telegraphed this in August, speaking to KFAN's Dan Barreiro in a FAN Free Forum. Barreiro posed the idea that the team should embrace a youth movement to avoid remaining in a mediocre purgatory, even at the expense of winning now. It was clear then that he had little time for the notion.

    "Young players have played for us, and they'll continue playing for us," Guerin explained. "But no, we don't want to just sacrifice a year, and say 'Here's your spot. Go play.' I guess that's fine for a team that's in a full rebuild. You just throw them out, and they play, doesn't matter what the results are. We're not there."

    Why not? "There's just too many good players to do it.... Why would we just get rid of [Jared] Spurgeon, and [Jonas] Brodin, and [Matt] Dumba, and Foligno, and all these guys that we've kept?" he asked. "You see other teams doing it, but that's a lot of pain, too. It's not two to three years, it's like seven to ten."

    It was a thoughtful answer, and nothing Guerin said was wrong in a vacuum. A full rebuild, sure, that is a lot of pain. But whether you want to call it a rebuild, a retool, a rebuild-on-the-fly, a step back, or any other euphemism: It's been happening. And the hard part should be essentially over.

    Minnesota has spent years accumulating a mass of assets. They have a borderline-generational goal-scorer in Kirill Kaprizov. They have a potential perennial All-Star in Matt Boldy. The Wild are set up well with the youngsters mentioned prior, plus a high-end goalie prospect in Jesper Wallstedt.

    There is also a middle ground between a "full teardown" and "going for it," and the Wild were suited to play in that area. Their youngsters aren't years away: Of Hockey Wilderness' Top-10 Prospects list, six of them are in the 20-22 age range, with Danila Yurov and Liam Öhgren turning 20 by February. That means next season, the majority of their top prospects will be entering their age-21-through-23 seasons at the moment the Zuccarello/Foligno/Hartman (again, probably) contracts kick in -- plenty old enough to start contributing. This doesn't even mention seasoned AHLers like Adam Beckman and Sammy Walker.

    So, what pain? Growing pains as these players adjust to the NHL? Unless they flop like a crappie in a puddle, fans are generally fairly patient to watch a young core develop and grow together. Fans in Minnesota should be especially primed to see a youth movement.

    Because you see, Guerin's also discounting the reality that the pain Wild fans are currently enduring is as real as a long rebuild. From grabbing a plummeting Dany Heatley, to the Parise and Suter contracts, to signing Thomas Vanek, to Paul Fenton's half-baked rebuild attempt, to now, this week's extensions, Minnesota has frequently chased short-sighted shortcuts.

    The team has had success, but only a limited definition of it. Fans will only take so many early playoff exits before pining for something else. The fact that many see these extensions as a betrayal of a long-term plan shows that Wild fans want something better.

    Where's the disconnect?

    Guerin almost bluntly says it in the FAN Free Forum: Keeping Kaprizov happy. "If you're in a full rebuild, does Kaprizov even sign here?" Guerin wondered aloud. "These are the things you have to think about."

    Guerin has to think about Kaprizov. The Russian superstar's decision to stay or leave in three years will greatly impact Minnesota's competitive window. Having Zuccarello, Foligno, and (probably) Hartman over these next three years probably establishes a floor that's higher than a roll of the prospect dice, even if it limits their ceiling.

    What's Kaprizov's appetite for that, though? He can read a CapFriendly page as easily as anyone else. The first two seasons of any new deal are going to coincide with the decline years of several veterans that the Wild are locked into. If the team as constructed can't find success in the next two years, what would give him confidence in them succeeding with an aging core that's only growing older?

    It feels like a recipe similar to that of Artemiy Panarin and the Columbus Blue Jackets. Columbus wanted to take advantage of a limited window in a desperation play to keep their star Russian around. Now, that came in the form of splashy trades, and not extensions. But it was a similar shortcut mentality. Still, even after winning a playoff series, it wasn't enough for the "Bread Man" to stick with a Columbus team with little long-term prospects outside of himself.

    With the caveat that Guerin knows Kaprizov better than those on the outside, it doesn't feel like keeping this core is going to be the magic formula to keeping Kaprizov happy. Wouldn't getting to play with fellow countrymen Danila Yurov and Marat Khusnutdinov next season be a better sell? Or the promise of a bright future over a core whose best days are behind them?

    The Plan was perfectly set up for them. It's hard to imagine a better chance for a rebuild-on-the-fly actually working in today's NHL. In the end, it was wishful thinking. The Wild still have a bright future. But instead of having a seamless transition to it, there's a risk the remnants of a mediocre past will dim their upside.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 4

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    1 hour ago, IllicitFive said:

    Devils advocate, could one make the argument they did exactly that, came in, stole a spot and didn't let go? Isn't that what we should want? The best players playing instead of just handing the keys over and hoping it works out?  I just assume I am not a GM for a reason but the tank idea drives me nuts, if it worked Arizona would be top dog by now. I am as frustrated as most are but I guess just have to sit back, watch hockey, and hope this year is our year. If a kid or 3 can show up and clearly take over for aging vets or others, and they still get 0 chance then I will also join in the call for turnover in coaches, maybe gm.

    You could definitely say that. We are not privy to most practices, and, perhaps the kids get their chance to show what they can do in practice. Perhaps they didn't do as well as we thought they would have, having the coaches conclude that they are not ready yet.

    I know this is a lot different, but when I coached in the youth ranks, some parents only showed up for games. Their expectation was that every kid got equal playing time. Yet, when I coached for a school, parents, again showed up to games and expected something similar. We practiced a lot harder with little to know audience for the school, and that's the way I wanted it. 

    But, in that environment, I was very protective of my players and only gave them what I thought they could handle. Each one was different, each one was unique. Confidence plays such a big part in sports, and if I just through them into the deep end, some would sink. Some were scared to death to even go into games and you could see them shaking. 

    I don't think you'll have that problem with the guys here, but to an extent, Guerin is seeing things, and probably Evason too, that I saw. You don't want to ruin a kid's confidence. You want him to get better at a level he can get better at, and at pressure he can get better at. I guess I was simply expecting the arrival to be sooner. 

    If we look back at history, many, many players don't make it until they're 23. Yet our expectation has somehow changed to 21. Perhaps some of this is about being physically mature too, and that sometimes doesn't happen until 23-24. I feel I've been patient, but it's running out!

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, mnfaninnc said:

    You could definitely say that. We are not privy to most practices, and, perhaps the kids get their chance to show what they can do in practice. Perhaps they didn't do as well as we thought they would have, having the coaches conclude that they are not ready yet.

    I know this is a lot different, but when I coached in the youth ranks, some parents only showed up for games. Their expectation was that every kid got equal playing time. Yet, when I coached for a school, parents, again showed up to games and expected something similar. We practiced a lot harder with little to know audience for the school, and that's the way I wanted it. 

    But, in that environment, I was very protective of my players and only gave them what I thought they could handle. Each one was different, each one was unique. Confidence plays such a big part in sports, and if I just through them into the deep end, some would sink. Some were scared to death to even go into games and you could see them shaking. 

    I don't think you'll have that problem with the guys here, but to an extent, Guerin is seeing things, and probably Evason too, that I saw. You don't want to ruin a kid's confidence. You want him to get better at a level he can get better at, and at pressure he can get better at. I guess I was simply expecting the arrival to be sooner. 

    If we look back at history, many, many players don't make it until they're 23. Yet our expectation has somehow changed to 21. Perhaps some of this is about being physically mature too, and that sometimes doesn't happen until 23-24. I feel I've been patient, but it's running out!

    I agree with you on this fully, I think its because we kept hearing about how amazing our prospect pool was, how deep and great these kids are or projected to be. But as you said the magic age seems to be around 23. I remember people being over Ek, I doubt many now would want him gone. Not everyone is a McDavid or Bedard who can just step in. My patience is running out as well, no doubt, but lets look at ages and truly when we should have a full view. 19, 20, and 21 year old's are still growing, building, bulking. A lot can change in a relatively short amount of time. This said it can feel like forever or extra since it feels everyone should be like a Faber or Boldy, step in early and get us all really excited for where there GROWTH will end up. Others just haven't hit that growth curve in my opinion. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, Up North Guy said:

    I agree that the K and A are similar. The problem is that Dino and Yurov are not getting the ice time they need. At least that was what I had read previously. BG may be taking that into mind as well along with the memory that KK97 was getting the same treatment and chose to resign one more time with Moscow. On top of that the political climate in Russia right now is extremely perilous for anyone wanting to leave,

    It hasn't affected Yurov one bit, he has sat on the bench for stretches the last two years and has jumped right in and impacted his line. His talents reaches more than anyone has given him credit for thus why he should have been a top ten pick if not for the NHL perceived Russian interference/hold.

    Yurov and KK are in communication and all signals are he is here next year along with Dino.

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...