Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness
  • The Wild Are Starting To Look Like the Team Bill Guerin Blew Up


    Image courtesy of Jerome Miron-USA Today Sports
    Tony Abbott

     

    When Bill Guerin took over the Minnesota Wild in 2019, he inherited a club that was long on experience and short on success. Led by long-time veterans like Mikko Koivu, Zach Parise, Ryan Suter, Eric Staal, and Devan Dubnyk, the Wild’s roster had an average age of 29.4 years old. That was tied for second in the NHL. The group hadn’t won a playoff series in five seasons. Critics around the State of Hockey called it a “country club” atmosphere.

    It did not take long for Guerin to figure out how to handle the situation. He blew that roster up. Within a year, Staal, Koivu, and Dubnyk were out, with Guerin hustling to navigate the former’s no-trade clause in dumping him. Sentiment be damned. In less than two years, out goes Parise and Suter in bold moves with ramifications that will still be felt over the next two seasons.

    Was it audacious? Yes. It’s hard to imagine Chuck Fletcher kicking so many guys to the curb. A world where Fletcher would let Koivu play games for the Columbus Blue Jackets instead of retiring as a Wild is unfathomable.

    But was it all necessary? Yes. An aging club with a rapidly closing window and a limited ceiling to begin with is no recipe for winning in the NHL. And as Guerin memorably said, “It’s about winning.”

    It’s that kind of brash bravado that got fans on board with a new vision for the Wild. The Wild are done playing it safe? They’re sick of the first-round losses and want to build a contender? A youth movement is on the way? Sign us up.

    Two weeks before the start of Year 5 of the Bill Guerin Experience and nine months before the Wild could finally start having some cap room with $24 million in cap space, that bold new vision became much murkier. So murky, in fact, that this team is looking a lot like the one he blew up. And if it is, it’s staying that way for a while.

    The Wild are old. Sure, they have young faces in prominent places. Kirill Kaprizov and Joel Eriksson Ek are both 26. Matt Boldy is 22, with Calen Addison (23), Marco Rossi (22), and Brock Faber (21) hoping to take big roles. But there’s no denying the Wild’s age. 

    Here are the top-ten oldest rosters entering the season:

    1) Pittsburgh Penguins: 30.7
    2) Washington Capitals: 29.5
    3) Minnesota Wild 28.9
    4) Dallas Stars: 28.8
    T-5) Toronto Maple Leafs: 28.6
    T-5) Seattle Kraken: 28.6
    T-5) New York Islanders: 28.6
    T-8) Colorado Avalanche: 28.5
    T-8) Carolina Hurricanes: 28.5
    10) New York Rangers: 28.4

    Just like the team Guerin took over, his Wild enter the season as one of the three oldest teams in the league. The rest of that list falls into one of four bins. There’s Pittsburgh and Washington, whose mission statement is Screw it, we’re getting as many miles out of our aging star players as possible. There’s the Kraken, which was all but forced to have an aging team due to their expansion draft rules. Then there are the Stars, Leafs, Avalanche, Hurricanes, and Rangers, all who fancy themselves Cup Contenders.

    Then there’s the “Just Plain Old” bucket, where the Wild and the Islanders sit.

    It was hard to care about the team’s average age before this past weekend, given their circumstances. Minnesota needed bargains to tide them over to a deep prospect pool and the Parise/Suter shackles to loosen. Being old was a necessary evil, or so we thought.

    After signing Mats Zuccarello and Marcus Foligno to contracts that take them to their late 30s, the Guerin and the Wild front office have committed to being an old team. Their security blankets are likely to form a new type of shackle.

    Minnesota has 14 players under contract next season, slated to have an average age of 29.1 – and that’s after 35-year-old Patrick Maroon joins 38-year-olds Marc-Andre Fleury and Alex Goligoski in coming off the books. In 2025-26, the mythical year when $13 million of dead cap vanishes, the Wild are locked into nine contracts with an average age of 30.9 and as much job security as the old Old Core enjoyed.

    Seriously, look at who will be under contract in  2025-26.

    • Mats Zuccarello: Age-38 season; pending UFA; $4.125M AAV; Full No-Move Clause
    • Jared Spurgeon: Age-36 season; one year to UFA; $7.575M* AAV; 10-team No-Trade Clause
    • Marcus Foligno: Age-34 season; two years to UFA; $4M* AAV; Full No-Move Clause
    • Jonas Brodin: Age-32 season; two years to UFA; $6M AAV; Zero trade protection
    • Freddy Gaudreau: Age-32 season; two years to UFA; $2.1 million; 15-team No-Trade Clause

    And no, this doesn’t account for the Ryan Hartman (32 in 2025-26) extension that appears destined to happen.

    Obviously, prospects will start taking some spots, which might help bring that average age down a touch. But remember: Everyone else on this team is older than they’ve ever been. And now they’re even older. By the time these deals start coming off the books, Kaprizov and Eriksson Ek will be 29, with Kaprizov currently slated for UFA status. Boldy will be in Year 4 of his contract. Many ELCs – from Rossi and Faber (and more) – will expire.

    That’s assuming, of course, that the Wild won’t find themselves with a similar problem as they did in the Koivu/Parise/Suter days. The ones where young players didn’t get prominent spots in the lineup because aging, entrenched veterans with a lot of job security are soaking up vital roles. 

    The team is showing little urgency to turn their roster over to their deep prospect pool in hopes of icing a younger, faster team with more upside. Instead, Guerin seems satisfied with his group and close-knit locker room culture, despite this team being 0-for-4 in postseason series on his watch. “I get [the criticisms],” he told the media Friday when explaining why he committed to paying Foligno $19.1 million over the next five years. “But you know what? I like our team with Marcus Foligno way better than without him.”

    It can not be ignored that Guerin has watched Foligno for 23 playoff games, where he’s only scored one goal and six points. Instead of being bold, Guerin’s habitually settled for what he knows, perhaps for the fear of the unknown. “Teams would step up for somebody like Marcus,” said Guerin. “We didn’t want to see it get to that.”

    You do that for a half-dozen or more veterans on the brink of their 30s, and you get a roster that’s going to be contending for the oldest in the league over the next several years. So close to the finish line of being able to turn over the team to a new look and feel, Guerin’s front office is delivering a team that threatens to look similar to the aging team he blew up.

    Now, one with a superstar in Kirill Kaprizov, and which seems to like each other? Sure. But the Wild are sticking to the status quo, hoping the same old team won’t deliver the same old results.

    *An earlier version misprinted the AAV of Jared Spurgeon and Marcus Foligno. We regret the error.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 4
    • Thanks 2
    • Sad 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    1 hour ago, Protec said:

    I will agree in that I also wanted to see Foligno's 3M AAV go away. I thought a new player could have filled in. Does that make this raise and extension a bad deal? Maybe if I'm comparing to my opinion or expectation. I'm saying we'll have to see what happens. Foligno is a unique case, not totally cut and dry. To us on the outside, it might seem like the Wild could just let Foligno go and Guerin could have. It looks like Guerin has made the call to let this group stay together awhile longer. Guerin talked about what these players would have been able to get as UFAs and they didn't want it to go that far. Yes, it's a little like the Goligoski deal where it looks like an overpay but technically they could buy Foligno out after a few years if he got career ending diarreah or decided to become an actor. The Wild had Rask for 4M, Duby for 4M, and Tyler Ennis for 4M. I just don't really think the Foligno contract can be qualified as a massive fail this early. Everybody wants to use last year and forget about GREEF because that was TWO years ago, it's just weird to me.

    The Wild have a bunch of prospects and no toxic prima donnas. The GM now played the game and commands way more respect than Fenton or Fletcher. His moves overall pulled the Wild out of the gutter where they were becoming like an Ottawa, Buffalo, or Edmonton of the recent dumpster-fire-zone with dysfunction everywhere. Now the last three years the Wild are in the playoffs and near the top of the division with star players under good contracts like Ek, Kaprizov, and Boldy. To say they're just like the team before is incorrect.

    There you go again Protec, making sense again and pulling me into considering this OR maybe its day 2 and this whole deal is just wearing me down. I'm on board with what you speaking!!!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Tony Abbott said:

    I like dunking on Fletcher, but I'm not sure what Guerin's done to be appreciably better than Fletcher. To me, keeping these old contracts on the books isn't incredibly different than selling every second-round pick.

    Well I think you should double-check. Guerin's record in a few years blows the doors off Fletcher's decade. Fletcher had to buy out Pomminville, Ennis, Vanek, and created the Suter/Parise problem with the owner. He traded 1st round picks too and left the prospect pool empty after giving Haula and Tuch to Vegas who are each still scoring GWGs in the NHL today.

    You can say Guerin would've done those same deals so easily because it's impossible to argue against hypothetical assumptions. Most of us were okay with the deals when they happened. The NHL and CBA is really what goofed the Wild with that. Probably my least grumpy grip about Fletcher.

    Guerin signed #97 and Boldy to nice deals that I believe you highlighted as strong value contracts per the numbers and stats. Then there's Ek who's also been valued quite high for his AAV. Finally there's the deals to solidify the back end. All of the sudden Guerin = Fletcher and the Spurgeon and Foligno deals are gonna screw the Wild. Those players have been "the Wild" for a long time even as team captains but they're washed up and overpaid it sounds like. I'm just not on the bandwagon with these deals being foolish. A little high, sure. An obstacle for the future, maybe, sure. Something that's gonna screw the Wild and Guerin should be ashamed, nah...

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Definitely not IBGIT here. But, if we try to read the tea leaves, is BG telling us that it's really Creed that won't be extended? Because BG saw what we saw from Moose (likely aging for his play style) and Zucc (def aging), especially in the playoffs, and actually rewarded them with extensions + NMC/NTC (bonkers after Goli a healthy scratch so much past 2 years - seems like a learning opportunity) . Could that maybe mean that without saying it, he is not happy with Deano, and he is the one on the chopping block?

    Also, we keep talking about our Russians coming over here soon. Is that 100%? Or, could they also be eyeing the logjam here, and decide they'd rather stay home than wait for injuries on a team that doesn't have room for young players?

    Edited by WIWild
    formatting
    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, WIWild said:

    Also, we keep talking about our Russians coming over here soon. Is that 100%? Or, could they also be eyeing the logjam here, and decide they'd rather stay home than wait for injuries on a team that doesn't have room for young players?

    You can bet on Khusnutdinov and Yurov being here and more than likely with the big club. KK and Yurov are already in contact and Yurov came to the US for prospect camp, definitely a good sign.

    Both are currently experiencing the non extension rath for playing time and will want to come stateside to get a fair shot. Yurov should have been a top 10 pick in his draft year and the Wild are the lucky recipients. Dino is the bonus!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Great article! Why Billy unhand cuffed himself with buyouts to turn around and handcuff himself before the buyouts were even done is insane.  I’m not a fan of the contracts. IMO overpaid. Just look at free agency this summer . The money is bad but the no trade contracts for guys that haven’t done or proven anything besides 1st round exits is mind boggling. There was no reason to sign them before season and definitely no reason for the ntc s . I think spurg is a terrible contract along with moose, freddy and probably Hartmans 8x8 that’s coming. Haha  

         I’m done believing in billy . Would really love to see a competitive wild team in my life time but not looking that way. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Tony Abbott said:

    We're talking like Guerin wouldn't have made those Parise/Suter deals, and he absolutely would have.

    I could say under Guerin those two wouldn't have taken over the organization and and crowned themselves manager, TOI boss, PP consultants hiring department, practice rink selectors, and Russo leakers.

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think you guys are all right on, it looks like an overpay based on last season. It blocks a young guy from an automatic slot. I'm just saying I think it will be okay and offering some justification for the decision now saying it's good from an organizational view especially. Not what the outside take says.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    In 2025-26, the mythical year when $13 million of dead cap vanishes, the Wild are locked into nine contracts with an average age of 30.9
     

    Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuudge!

     

    • Like 1
    • Sad 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Mooch - You're the most outspoken Guerin hater but the Wild just keep making the playoffs and have a bright future. 

    Do you think he should have sent both guys to UFA or try to trade them? If so, who fills that role? Do you think they're just firing from the hip? 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    26 minutes ago, TCMooch said:

    Bill Guerin is a terrible GM and these two signings are just further proof of that. Never been a huge fan of his to begin with.

    What else has he done that's been so terrible? 

    1. Sign KK out of Russia AND extend him after initial contract?
    2. Clean house of the past regime and actually make legitimate trades: Zucker for Addison/Lambos; Kunin for Bonino/Khusnutdinov
    3. Buyout Parise/Suter and save the franchise of 7 more years of cap heist toil
    4. Change the culture and expectations of the Wild
    5. Trade Fiala for Faber/Öhgren draft pick and then use our pick to take Yurov 
    6. Trade for Middy and dumping a goalie who is never gonna make it in the NHL (Kahkonen)
    7. Trade up for a franchise goalie in Wallstedt
    8. Sign Hartman to 3yr $1.75M/yr. deal
    9. Sign Ek to a team friendly contract for 8 years
    10. Sign Boldy to a cost savings contract to 7 years
    11. Trade Talbot for Gustavsson and develop a starting goalie
    12. Dump Greenway for a legitimate 2nd round pick in Riley Heidt.
    13. McBain traded to Arizona for a 2nd for Hunter Haight
    14. Sign Sammy Walker as a UFA
    15. Trade nothing for late season additions to keep us afloat in the playoff rounds. Fleury; Middleton; Reaves; Nyquist; Johannsson

     

    1.  SIGN MARCUS FOLIGNO TO A $4M/4YR DEAL - TERRIBLE
    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It's a pretty good summary. There are some moves that are fairly criticized no doubt but if the Wild are making the playoffs every year with wins against good teams and seldom losses to non-playoff teams while prospects are being stockpiled, I think the "fire Guerin" suggestion isn't a majority opinion. Again, I'd have to ask who replaces him? Fletcher is without a job again, perhaps some would like to go back to executive types or analytics gurus. I'd rather have a tough retired player who's been around a long time in every role from prospect to GM. 

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Wild open the season without a lot of open roster/cap space, but the Wild played over 20 forwards last season(at least 3 games each, 19 had at least 9 games) and 10 defensemen saw more than 1 game with the Wild(8 played 15+ games).

    Some players will miss a few games here and there, and the youth from Iowa, those who are ready, will get their chances to fill in.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 hours ago, TCMooch said:

    Bill Guerin is a terrible GM and these two signings are just further proof of that. Never been a huge fan of his to begin with.

    Without diving through post history, in your opinion why is he so terrible?

    Vonlonster67 very thoroughly outlined some of his great deals since being GM. While I do not agree with the term/money for Moose or Zucc for that matter he has made some good moves that should pay dividends in the future.

    I surmised it in another thread I think Foglino is a placeholder for 2yrs until the prospects get here and then he gets relegated to the 4th to be the Reaves/Maroon role. Think even in a decline he is better than those 2. I'm sure (or I'd hope) that conversation was had that he is not going to be a 3rd line player for the remainder of his contract. Maybe Billy was just tired of chasing those types of guys through free agency??

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    13 hours ago, Protec said:

    You can say Guerin would've done those same deals so easily because it's impossible to argue against hypothetical assumptions. Most of us were okay with the deals when they happened. The NHL and CBA is really what goofed the Wild with that. Probably my least grumpy grip about Fletcher.

    This paragraph cannot be stressed enough. Any GM would have tried to sign the top 2 free agents in that UFA class. Longterm deals were being signed all the time back then in that type of length category to circumvent the cap rules. Fletcher didn't do anything outside of the norm of the day. Maybe a year early, but he knew he'd have to buyout the back end and when he signed them, there was no real penalty for that.

    For the NHL and NHLPA to agree on a CBA that retroactively went back and changed the rules is the real culprit here. This is pretty much unheard of, as contracts like that are generally just grandfathered in, but the penalties for them start at the new deal. Time weans them out. 

    Yes, Shooter would have gone after those 2 guys too. And I think both of those guys would have respected Shooter for they played against him. The biggest issue that Fletcher had (yes, even bigger than his cap incompetence), is that he didn't play the game and didn't know much about team chemistry. His teams were drawn up on paper without much knowledge of their personalities. The list of free agents he had to buyout should have worked on paper, but their games just didn't fit the Wild strategy. Vanek's, I think, was the most perplexing. 

    13 hours ago, WIWild said:

    But, if we try to read the tea leaves, is BG telling us that it's really Creed that won't be extended?

    This is the fascinating question of the discussion. Here you go, Deano. You've got your guys, now make them win playoff series'. I do believe we will see a coaching change coming when this group fails to get out of the 1st round again. At that point, we may see way more youth making the team, and guys with designations wanting to go elsewhere. 

    We really should start investigating possible replacements at this time.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 hours ago, Tony Abbott said:

    To me, keeping these old contracts on the books isn't incredibly different than selling every second-round pick.

    Very interesting comment. The cunucksarmy.com states that only 1 in 3 AHLers make it to the N.  If 3 draft picks each year enter the AHL.  Only 1 of those 3 is destined for the N.   How do you build a team through the draft when so few picks each year are viable NHL prospects .... or does a GM rely on trading those 2nd rounders away to fill in the gaps of a roster?

    I've heard a dozen prospects tossed around on HW that suggest these players will be NHL ready in a year or 2.  It sure seems that BG only thinks a few (if any) are viable.... the majority are trade bate along with future 2nd round draft picks.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 minutes ago, MNCountryLife said:

    Very interesting comment. The cunucksarmy.com states that only 1 in 3 AHLers make it to the N.  If 3 draft picks each year enter the AHL.  Only 1 of those 3 is destined for the N.   How do you build a team through the draft when so few picks each year are viable NHL prospects .... or does a GM rely on trading those 2nd rounders away to fill in the gaps of a roster?

    I've heard a dozen prospects tossed around on HW that suggest these players will be NHL ready in a year or 2.  It sure seems that BG only thinks a few (if any) are viable.... the majority are trade bate along with future 2nd round draft picks.  

    Your point on AHL prospects needs a deep dive.

    I would be curious across the NHL what the actual product looks like. There are several players who are AHL establishments just to keep the franchise viable and provide legitimate competition for those who make a pit stop from the NCAA or limited KHL players.  Some draft picks, but many free agents from all hockey levels.

    Several are average tweeners that may see a call up.  Each NHL franchise uses their AHL franchise differently. Imagine being a prospect in the TB organization. 

    So it may be a pretty broad statement based on each NHL team's philosophy 

     

    Edited by vonlonster67
    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, MNCountryLife said:

    I've heard a dozen prospects tossed around on HW that suggest these players will be NHL ready in a year or 2.  It sure seems that BG only thinks a few (if any) are viable.... the majority are trade bate along with future 2nd round draft picks.  

    If that's the case and these guys don't pan out... it's on the regime. They're his guys!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 minutes ago, Tony Abbott said:

    If that's the case and these guys don't pan out... it's on the regime. They're his guys!

    Excellent point.  The buck stops at GMBG even for preparation of prospects.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    13 hours ago, vonlonster67 said:

    1. SIGN MARCUS FOLIGNO TO A $4M/4YR DEAL - TERRIBLE

    I'm not going to argue Guerin's a bad GM or that he should be fired or anything, but that doesn't strike me as a terribly honest list of his flaws. Just off the top of my head.

    1. Signing Alex Goligoski to a bad two-year extension. Wild have no flexibility this season in part because their 7th defenseman is soaking up $2.5 million.
    2. The only reason they dumped Greenway is because they signed him to a three-year extension in the first place, only to flip him at the low point of his value.
    3. Losing Fiala is as much as a minus as a plus to me, personally. Had a dynamic team with loads of offense, couldn't suck it up and his team immediately goes from top-five in offense to bottom-ten. His contracts to replace him (Greenway, Jost, Steel) mostly flamed out.
    4. Constantly rejecting any sort of upside for the playoffs. Not using Boldy in 2021 against Vegas, even with injuries. Not having a single game where Kaprizov/Fiala/Rossi/Boldy are in a lineup in 2022. Not playing Rossi last year even after Ek got hurt.
    5. Poor handling of Rossi in general in favor of tired old center options that haven't gotten it done.
    6. Five year extension for Freddy Gaudreau that no one else on earth would have signed. 
    7. John Klingberg wasn't expensive, but tanking their power play in the playoffs to make a point to Calen Addison fizzled.
    8. Blocking his own rebuild with contracts to mid-30s guys in Zuccarello and Foligno

     

    And from the "Remains to Be Seen" category:
    1. How bad is this Hartman extension going to be?
    2. If His Team doesn't win, how good is it going to look sticking with a coach that hasn't won a playoff series since he was in Juniors?
    3. The Kaprizov contract situation. If Guerin bites the bullet and gives Kaprizov 10-11 million, it sounds like he signs an 8-year deal. Instead, he gives him a five-year deal that gives him the power to pick his spot, should he want to, in Year 4 (next year!). 

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    13 minutes ago, Tony Abbott said:

    I'm not going to argue Guerin's a bad GM or that he should be fired or anything, but that doesn't strike me as a terribly honest list of his flaws. Just off the top of my head.

    1. Signing Alex Goligoski to a bad two-year extension. Wild have no flexibility this season in part because their 7th defenseman is soaking up $2.5 million.
    2. The only reason they dumped Greenway is because they signed him to a three-year extension in the first place, only to flip him at the low point of his value.
    3. Losing Fiala is as much as a minus as a plus to me, personally. Had a dynamic team with loads of offense, couldn't suck it up and his team immediately goes from top-five in offense to bottom-ten. His contracts to replace him (Greenway, Jost, Steel) mostly flamed out.
    4. Constantly rejecting any sort of upside for the playoffs. Not using Boldy in 2021 against Vegas, even with injuries. Not having a single game where Kaprizov/Fiala/Rossi/Boldy are in a lineup in 2022. Not playing Rossi last year even after Ek got hurt.
    5. Poor handling of Rossi in general in favor of tired old center options that haven't gotten it done.
    6. Five year extension for Freddy Gaudreau that no one else on earth would have signed. 
    7. John Klingberg wasn't expensive, but tanking their power play in the playoffs to make a point to Calen Addison fizzled.
    8. Blocking his own rebuild with contracts to mid-30s guys in Zuccarello and Foligno

     

    And from the "Remains to Be Seen" category:
    1. How bad is this Hartman extension going to be?
    2. If His Team doesn't win, how good is it going to look sticking with a coach that hasn't won a playoff series since he was in Juniors?
    3. The Kaprizov contract situation. If Guerin bites the bullet and gives Kaprizov 10-11 million, it sounds like he signs an 8-year deal. Instead, he gives him a five-year deal that gives him the power to pick his spot, should he want to, in Year 4 (next year!). 

    You still haven't learned have you Tony.

    Those are ALL on Deano.

    Repeat after me, everything bad Deano, everything good BG.

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    43 minutes ago, Tony Abbott said:

    I'm not going to argue Guerin's a bad GM or that he should be fired or anything, but that doesn't strike me as a terribly honest list of his flaws. Just off the top of my head.

    1. Signing Alex Goligoski to a bad two-year extension. Wild have no flexibility this season in part because their 7th defenseman is soaking up $2.5 million.
    2. The only reason they dumped Greenway is because they signed him to a three-year extension in the first place, only to flip him at the low point of his value.
    3. Losing Fiala is as much as a minus as a plus to me, personally. Had a dynamic team with loads of offense, couldn't suck it up and his team immediately goes from top-five in offense to bottom-ten. His contracts to replace him (Greenway, Jost, Steel) mostly flamed out.
    4. Constantly rejecting any sort of upside for the playoffs. Not using Boldy in 2021 against Vegas, even with injuries. Not having a single game where Kaprizov/Fiala/Rossi/Boldy are in a lineup in 2022. Not playing Rossi last year even after Ek got hurt.
    5. Poor handling of Rossi in general in favor of tired old center options that haven't gotten it done.
    6. Five year extension for Freddy Gaudreau that no one else on earth would have signed. 
    7. John Klingberg wasn't expensive, but tanking their power play in the playoffs to make a point to Calen Addison fizzled.
    8. Blocking his own rebuild with contracts to mid-30s guys in Zuccarello and Foligno

     

    And from the "Remains to Be Seen" category:
    1. How bad is this Hartman extension going to be?
    2. If His Team doesn't win, how good is it going to look sticking with a coach that hasn't won a playoff series since he was in Juniors?
    3. The Kaprizov contract situation. If Guerin bites the bullet and gives Kaprizov 10-11 million, it sounds like he signs an 8-year deal. Instead, he gives him a five-year deal that gives him the power to pick his spot, should he want to, in Year 4 (next year!). 

    Disagree.....

    1. Goose is making $2M/yr and this is fall out when we didn't have any other options on D and cap options after the $5M
    2. Greenway? You kiddin? He priced him self out of town due to effort.
    3. Fiala?? You really want to sacrifice half the team and lose Boldy.
    4. DE...Boldy turned out just fine without that pressure and Rossi same
    5. DE....but again Rossi determined his fate every time he stepped on the ice
    6. Freddy is the mentor and smooth out for Rossi and looks like a steal with what they paid Moose
    7. Klingberg was a flyer and a nothing deal, you really think Addy could have got us to playoffs and beyond. Addy controlled his own stubborn fate.
    8. No one is ready to replace Zucc this year BG gets competition next year, Moose no one to replace his size and Hartzy is owed more for what he's done and is 29 worth a 3yr try and support on 4th line.

    Remaining:

    1. At least we know we'll have Hartzy to replace a 4th line spot
    2. Sticking with DE this year doesn't impact anything
    3. KK will sign with the Wild but no way at $10-11M...try $15M X 5
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...