Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness
  • The Wild Should Target Mitch Marner In A Blockbuster Trade


    Image courtesy of Matt Blewett-USA TODAY Sports
    Kalisha Turnipseed

     

    It's time for the Minnesota Wild to add another superstar. Kirill Kaprizov isn't enough to help the Wild get over the playoff hump, especially playing in an elite Central Division and Western Conference. Minnesota is too dependent on its prospect pool to drive to win. However, prospects take time to adjust to the NHL and may not make an impact soon enough to keep Kaprizov in Minnesota after his contract expires. Kaprizov is the Wild’s franchise player, and they need to keep him here. 

    Mitch Marner is a star player for the Toronto Maple Leafs, but Auston Matthews is their franchise cornerstone. It would likely take a lot for Toronto to move Marner, but they may trade him if a team presents the right offer. Like the Wild, the Leafs are looking for answers to why they've endured playoff disappointments. 

    Marner will become an Unrestricted Free Agent (UFA) in 2025-26 and likely cash in on his next extension. It’s unlikely that the Leafs would change one of their cornerstones, but they also must consider their cap situation. Therefore, the Wild need to be aggressive and enter the Marner sweepstakes. 

    Marner has a No-Movement Clause (NMC) that prevents the Leafs and Wild from making a trade. However, the Wild may get Marner to waive his NMC. Let's use Matthew Tkachuk as a comparison trade example for Marner. 

    Tkachuk was enduring first-round exits with the Calgary Flames and was uncommitted to Calgary. Therefore, the Flames traded Tkachuk to the Florida Panthers for Jonathan Huberdeau, MacKenzie Weegar, Cole Schwindt, and a conditional first-round pick in 2025. The Panthers are contenders, and Tkachuk has been an excellent cornerstone for Florida alongside Aleksander Barkov. Kaprizov and Marner can duplicate the star combination of Tkachuk and Barkov. 

    How can the Wild bring in Marner? It will start with trading Matt Boldy, opening up cap space to extend Marner. Boldy represents Huberdeau in this case. Boldy's been a pleasant surprise for the Wild as part of their core four, but he's not a superstar with experience like Marner. Can Boldy become a superstar someday? Maybe, but he isn’t yet. Marner can replace Boldy's skillset. While Marner doesn't have Boldy's size, he's more skilled and a game-breaking player. 

    The Wild should move Riley Heidt, who represents Schwindt as a top prospect. Danila Yurov is untouchable because he’s producing against professionals in Russia. Experts don’t project Heidt to be a 100-point scorer, but seeing him as a top-six talent in the NHL is not unreasonable. Marner has a 100-point upside since Kaprizov is a proven 100-point scorer. Marner would complement Kaprizov more immediately than any prospect. 

    To continue moving cap space, the Wild should have Frederick Gaudreau waive his Modified No-Trade Clause (M-NTC). That should create around $9.1 million of cleared cap space to extend Marner. Gaudreau would thrive as Toronto’s fourth-line center. The Wild should also look into moving Declan Chisholm as someone who can fulfill depth purposes on the blueline behind Morgan Reilly. Chisholm won't be expensive to extend, but Minnesota needs to save money to extend Brock Faber because he’s becoming their best defenseman. 

    The Wild can likely complete the trade by moving a conditional first-round pick in 2025, much like the Panthers did for Tkachuk. The terms are that it becomes a first if Minnesota reaches the Western Conference Finals. If not, it becomes a second. General manager Brad Treliving can live with knowing he's getting a potential first, Boldy, Heidt, and Chisholm. The Wild also moved Gaudreau's contract for a superstar, which is sweet. 

    Marner will excel playing on the top line with Kaprizov, where they can create scoring magic. Pairing them would allow Joel Eriksson Ek to be an effective two-way center playing with two high-end producers. They become the 2015 draft line, capable of doing damage offensively at even strength and on the power play, which is what the Wild desperately lack. 

    Marner would give the Wild a lethal top power-play unit. Marner is a better playmaker than Mats Zuccarello. Marner will be able to set up Kaprizov a lot for goals. However, Marner can also finish. 

    Marner won't waive his clause unless he’s more likely to get a contract extension with a new team. The cap will open up in 2025-26 for the Wild, allowing Guerin to take advantage of pursuing Marner. Matthews signed a four-year extension worth $53 million ($13.25 million AAV) with the Leafs instead of signing a long-term deal. Could this spell the end of the Matthews era in Toronto? If so, Marner may not be staying much longer. 

    Should the Wild consider offering Marner a seven-year extension worth anywhere from $12.75 million to $13 million AAV? Marner has leverage due to his NMC. He isn't moving unless he's got a favorable long-term contract. If the Wild can offer Marner an extension close to what Matthews is making, then Marner will likely consider waiving it. 

    Marner has been productive in the playoffs despite the Leafs facing early-round eliminations. Marner has scored 50 points in 57 career playoff games, which is close enough to a point-per-game. That would give the Wild primary scoring when they need it the most alongside Kaprizov. 

    Adding Marner would help Eriksson Ek's production. Eriksson Ek always came up short regarding winning the Selke trophy. If Eriksson Ek plays with Kaprizov and Marner all year, he'll reach point-per-game production, including scoring 40 goals. Eriksson Ek is the perfect center to bring out the best in Kaprizov and Marner. 

    The Wild are building around their superstar, Kaprizov, by adding another superstar to help take the load off Kaprizov. Marner will be motivated to help the Wild get over the hump. A change of scenery will be good for Marner to learn about the hockey culture in Minnesota, and Kaprizov is pleased with the addition of Marner. 

     

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 1
    • Confused 4

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Hard pass on Marner.  He got pushed around in the first round series and wasn’t very good.  Have to give up to much for what he is paid and brings to the table.

    I would like to see them go after these forwards - Necas of the hurricanes, Guentzal on a cheap homecoming deal, Perron, for Dmen J Chykrun and another right big handed Dman. Any remaining money get another good forward like duclair or buchnevich.  You will have to trade Rossi, Spurgeon, Gus, Mojo, Freddie, Beckman etc.  This would completely change the makeup of our team and make us much better. This is the big sort of offseason Billy needs to make happen.

    • Like 7
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hooray for pipedreams

    And no.  Marner wouldn't come here, even for that kind of money.  Getting rid of Gaudreau would be nice, but I doubt Toronto would want that.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Moreso than even what it would take for the trade, I worry about spending x dollars on so many people.  The Torontos and Edmontons have not succeeded putting all their eggs in 1-2 star player baskets.  Toronto screwed up even worse, giving 4 people $10m+...

    I took a look at the Rangers, Hurricanes, Bruins, Avalanche, Stars, etc.  Teams that have been the top end teams for a few years.  Their teams have at most one $10-12m guy, 1-2 more $8-9m guys, and then spreading the wealth around as needed for depth.  I don't see those teams struggling to compete.  You have a couple Florida players peaking at $10m, but not much over that.  Everyone else is in the $7-9m range.

    I understand the Wild's need for higher end talent, but you have a top 10 player already (for now).  Once you shave off the 13+ excess from Suter and Parise, you have Boldy at $7m for years, Ek at the stupid bargain that is $5.25m (he's producing at a $7-8m player level for so cheap, good lord).  Spurgeon/Brodin at 6-8m.  You get Faber in a $8-9m hopefully, you're kinda in line with what the rest of the league is doing.

    I don't see the Wild wanting to follow the Edmonton/Toronto cap spending path since that has yet to warrant the prolonged playoff success.  The best Edmonton has gotten is a Conference final, but even having two of the absolute best hasn't been a guarantee.  I think Guerin is going to be prudent and stay more inline with league trends, even once the gloves are off, even with higher space in the future.

    Edited by Citizen Strife
    • Like 6
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    the formula is there, so now let's just replace Marner with another (i am just not a big fan of Marner)

    and maybe keep Boldy and advertise instead our young rookie phenom Rossi!

    let's dream - 

    Andrei Svechnikov - Canes out in 4 and his wife is besty w Kap's GF

    Matvei Mitchkov - Some compare him to Lemioux, some to Gretzkiy, some to Kessel. 2/3 chance he is an ok player. i'd be willing to toss Boldy back in that trade

    Peter Forsberg - Nash had enough and decides to rebuild and we have a great history with them, so Leo swooops in and gets him for rossi, few firsts and a fleury!

    Pacciorety - oh please NOOOO

    Marchessalt - Vegas out right, good, and you know they are due for one questionable move every year, so let's be there for this one

    Kevin Fiala - we all miss that guy, let's not kid ourselves!

     

     

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    26 minutes ago, OldDutchChip said:

    the formula is there, so now let's just replace Marner with another (i am just not a big fan of Marner)

    and maybe keep Boldy and advertise instead our young rookie phenom Rossi!

    let's dream - 

    Andrei Svechnikov - Canes out in 4 and his wife is besty w Kap's GF

    Matvei Mitchkov - Some compare him to Lemioux, some to Gretzkiy, some to Kessel. 2/3 chance he is an ok player. i'd be willing to toss Boldy back in that trade

    Peter Forsberg - Nash had enough and decides to rebuild and we have a great history with them, so Leo swooops in and gets him for rossi, few firsts and a fleury!

    Pacciorety - oh please NOOOO

    Marchessalt - Vegas out right, good, and you know they are due for one questionable move every year, so let's be there for this one

    Kevin Fiala - we all miss that guy, let's not kid ourselves!

     

     

    You been hittin the beers early this morning? 😂

    You must be referring to Filip Forsberg, Peter’s son lol.

    if we’re dreaming why don’t we just trade for McDavid, Makar, Hellebuyck, Mckinnen as #2, Pastrnak and Tkachuk on wing and win it all! Bam! Problem solved!

    • Haha 6
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, Mateo3xm said:

    You been hittin the beers early this morning? 😂

    You must be referring to Filip Forsberg, Peter’s son lol.

    if we’re dreaming why don’t we just trade for McDavid, Makar, Hellebuyck, Mckinnen as #2, Pastrnak and Tkachuk on wing and win it all! Bam! Problem solved!

    you right its Filip! argh but i am sticking by all my other suggestions!

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Boldy's value on his contract is higher than Mitch Marner(cap hit of $10,903,000).

    If the Wild were trading Boldy for Marner, Toronto is the one that should be sweetening the deal with picks or prospects.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    You know they wouldn't.  They are Toronto, owner and overseer of all the NHL publicity machine.  I doubt their GM is a complete idiot, but I guarantee you the media would have a field day going, "Why should Toronto sweeten the Marner deal for fucking Boldy?"  So the GM would more than likely state the Wild need more.

    Besides, Marner is a 80-90 pt guy, while Boldy is a 60-70 pt guy right now.  Dem the breaks.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This is an interesting option Kalisha brings up. A more aged guy but still young who has more refined skill than a current Boldy. 

    Marner has the RHS and is definitely a dynamic player. How would he fair in the West? Probably pretty good in the regular season. He's really playing wing, but he could play center. Let's look at his measurements: 6' 180. So we'd be trading a guy who's 6'2" 200+ who is refining some pretty special skills and is on a pretty nice contract. She's adding Heidt, Chisholm and Gaudreau to a team that is also cap strapped. 

    I realize that Brady Tkachuk isn't an RHS, but I think this is the guy we need more than anything (or a guy who can play just like him). Big, strong, physical who puts pucks in the net with a nice shot or greasy goals. He hasn't seen playoff action, but I would be surprised if he's much different than his brother or dad when he finally sees it. 

    Toronto again failed in the playoffs. Ottawa hasn't made the playoffs for 7 straight years. Who would be the more desperate team? New owner, new GM, new coach, I'd argue it's Ottawa. Of course, you'd have to overpay on paper, but this is more the type of player we need. 

    I believe McTavish on the Ducks is also this type of player. We need one of those guys, a guy with an unbelievable engine, silky mitts, and is large and physical, all in one package. He's also got to hate to lose. 

    You know who Edmonton doesn't have? One of these guys. That's what's missing for them. Kane is the guy closest to it, but he disappears depending on how he feels. The guy who just plain hates to lose raises everyone else's game and intensity level. Foligno is kind of like that, except he can't score at will. 

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    No way! Marner and his contract orange portion thereof do not belong in MN...

    The suggestion of AI writing these articles makes me wonder about who programs AI? 🙂

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    25 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    This is an interesting option Kalisha brings up. A more aged guy but still young who has more refined skill than a current Boldy. 

    Marner has the RHS and is definitely a dynamic player. How would he fair in the West? Probably pretty good in the regular season. He's really playing wing, but he could play center. Let's look at his measurements: 6' 180. So we'd be trading a guy who's 6'2" 200+ who is refining some pretty special skills and is on a pretty nice contract. She's adding Heidt, Chisholm and Gaudreau to a team that is also cap strapped. 

    I realize that Brady Tkachuk isn't an RHS, but I think this is the guy we need more than anything (or a guy who can play just like him). Big, strong, physical who puts pucks in the net with a nice shot or greasy goals. He hasn't seen playoff action, but I would be surprised if he's much different than his brother or dad when he finally sees it. 

    Toronto again failed in the playoffs. Ottawa hasn't made the playoffs for 7 straight years. Who would be the more desperate team? New owner, new GM, new coach, I'd argue it's Ottawa. Of course, you'd have to overpay on paper, but this is more the type of player we need. 

    I believe McTavish on the Ducks is also this type of player. We need one of those guys, a guy with an unbelievable engine, silky mitts, and is large and physical, all in one package. He's also got to hate to lose. 

    You know who Edmonton doesn't have? One of these guys. That's what's missing for them. Kane is the guy closest to it, but he disappears depending on how he feels. The guy who just plain hates to lose raises everyone else's game and intensity level. Foligno is kind of like that, except he can't score at will. 

    I'd suggest to Bill that he look at guys who are UFAs like Dakota Joshua, Michael Amadio, Steven Lorentz, Yakov Trenin, Duclair, or Guentzal up front. Depending on what you've gotta spend. Starting at the bottom with 800K guys there's players the Wild could go after in a few tiers of required AAV. You definitely want playoff guys. Tough, big players who don't get pushed around and are durable. 

    Look at that list and what they've done for their cost. Add playoffs and factors I mentioned, then look at MN's forward group and you'd notice half a dozen places any of the guys I mentioned are big upgrades. Just sayin, Bill being static this Summer would be stupid.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hard no, I'd rather keep Boldy. And all the talk about trading Rossi is confusing as well. He's on an upward trajectory, was very good last year, and should be even better next year. He was one of the best in the face-off circle as well which the Wild notoriously struggle with. He's cheap right now and they need Center depth especially since Boldy is now exclusively a winger. Don't trade either.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I want bigger players that still have skill.  Boldy is still filling out and is extremely talented and 6' 2''.  You keep guys like him.   This team isn't going to win a cup next year.  Using any means necessary expunge Nojo, Freddy and Filip Gus.  The Wall is ready.  We need 1 D man that can really compete to fill out the D and a forward like Debrusk that can fit on the 2nd line and produce.  Someone in the $4m range.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hopefully Boldy is at the gym right now doing squats and bench while watching Hanson Bros. or old Don Cherry vids and developing a meat-head type toughness. Confrontational and a little crazy. 

    Forget golf, boxing or knife-fighting if there's time between eating steak & eggs and practicing one-timers.

    • Like 1
    • Haha 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, Citizen Strife said:

    You know they wouldn't.  They are Toronto, owner and overseer of all the NHL publicity machine.  I doubt their GM is a complete idiot, but I guarantee you the media would have a field day going, "Why should Toronto sweeten the Marner deal for fucking Boldy?"  So the GM would more than likely state the Wild need more.

    Besides, Marner is a 80-90 pt guy, while Boldy is a 60-70 pt guy right now.  Dem the breaks.

    I'm not suggesting Toronto should do that. I'm merely stating that Boldy could easily reach 70-90 points in the near future and has a contract paying $7M per year through 2030.

    Marner is at nearly $11M, possibly $12M soon, so any added value in play should be erased by the extra $4-5M salary you can use to improve your team elsewhere.

    There is certainly value in getting an extra 16 points from 1 player versus 2 players, but Boldy is still improving and might quickly reach the level that Marner is at now. Also, when Austin Mathews is removed from the equation, how much would Marner's points/60 fall?

    Boldy has played 250 fewer minutes the last 2 seasons and has more goals scored than Mitch Marner(60-56). How much of the assist differential is due to teammates and how much better will Boldy become in his prime- under this same contract?

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Marner never should have got so much money to begin with. If you even consider trading for him,(any team) you're starting out with a goofed-up value on a pure skill guy which is the most Toronto thing ever. They probably wanna sign Stamkos right now and are looking for answers.

    I wouldn't even take their calls. If they wanna retain about 7M, maybe I'd be willing to trade NoJo, Merrill, and the Linguinie boys but stay the heck away from a terrible Marner contract per his overall NHL value.

    Danton Heinen for example is <1M and can get you like 30pts. So basically MN should be upgrading with UFAs. Currently prospects are okay, but NoJo is overpaid by that measure. The Wild could imagine a guy like Zach Hymen who's getting 5.5M and what he can do for your team compared to what Marner brings. It's like another Fiala. Great regular season stats and nothingburgerness in the playoffs... 

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The thing is, that extra 4-5m difference already covers what a Hartman does, so 40-45 pts, and lineup versatility.  So, the Wild actually come out ahead in a sense.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Stamkos is who they should try for via free agency. Leadership, right shot., power play scorer . Yes the age but a motivated stamkos after Tampa plays games with him would be beneficial for us. Ek , stamkos . That’s a legit top two centers. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If you want to do a blockbuster trade, go for Kucherov. They are strapped salary-wise (and very top heavy), want Stamkos and Hedman to play it out and retire in Tampa, need a goalie (Gustavsson), top six foward (Rossi), depth forwards (Johansson and Gaudreau), draft picks (2025, 2026 firsts), and prospects (Haight, Beckman, and Spacek?)....Tampa stays competetive and gains a future, Wild get Kaprizov's buddy who will provide immediate scoring impact, and may help to re-sign Kap.

    Might take another 2nd rounder, but Wild could get back a 3rd in 2026.

     

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    25 minutes ago, Lern2spell said:

    If you want to do a blockbuster trade, go for Kucherov. They are strapped salary-wise (and very top heavy), want Stamkos and Hedman to play it out and retire in Tampa, need a goalie (Gustavsson), top six foward (Rossi), depth forwards (Johansson and Gaudreau), draft picks (2025, 2026 firsts), and prospects (Haight, Beckman, and Spacek?)....Tampa stays competetive and gains a future, Wild get Kaprizov's buddy who will provide immediate scoring impact, and may help to re-sign Kap.

    Might take another 2nd rounder, but Wild could get back a 3rd in 2026.

     

    It's a whopper!

    Could the State of Hockey land a big one like that?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    After we get kucherov, then we target mcdavid by selling nojofa, Fred, Merrill and goligiski.  Then when no one is looking do a deal for Tjazkuc.  Don’t know why more aren’t thinking of this. 

    • Haha 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    18 hours ago, kirillgonkillya said:

    Hard no, I'd rather keep Boldy. And all the talk about trading Rossi is confusing as well. He's on an upward trajectory, was very good last year, and should be even better next year. He was one of the best in the face-off circle as well which the Wild notoriously struggle with. He's cheap right now and they need Center depth especially since Boldy is now exclusively a winger. Don't trade either.

    At a time when Guerin should be patting Rossi on the back and encouraging him he is instead throwing him out there as trade bait. This has to be a wtf moment for Rossi. Every team out there is fully aware of the Wild's cap problems and no one is going to overpay for anyone the Wild wants to trade. That's what Guerin is hoping for.  I'm hoping Rossi puts up 40 next year and then tells Guerin he wants out and won't sign an extension.  

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...