Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness
  • Nikolaj Ehlers Has the Speed Minnesota Desperately Needs


    Image courtesy of James Carey Lauder-USA TODAY Sports
    Justin Wiggins

     

    This has the potential to be a very interesting off-season for the Minnesota Wild. When GM Bill Guerin surprisingly bought out Ryan Suter and Zach Parise's contracts, many pointed to the 2025 offseason as their window to start adding pieces to contend. The theory would be their plethora of young talent would round into form, and they'd mix them in with a few key veteran additions using their newfound cap flexibility to create a true contender around Kirill Kaprizov.

    But the Wild could get creative in moving that timeline up. While the Wild are still mired in nearly $15 million in dead cap hits for the 2024-25 season, the NHL announced that the salary cap could jump nearly $5 million league-wide this spring.

    Michael Russo has reported in The Athletic numerous times that he feels the Wild are earmarking that $5 million increase to target a forward to replace the enigma that is Marcus Johansson in their top six. Just a few weeks ago, we began scouring the potential free agency list, and they identified David Perron as one of the best names.

    While a veteran such as Perron would help the Wild, his limited aging skillset makes him not exactly an inspiring addition to a team that hopes to return to the playoffs next season.

    However, Guerin can get more creative than pursuing the free agent market, where his options are limited. Even after promoting Marco Rossi and Brock Faber to the NHL club, the Wild maintains a deep prospect pool, including blue-chippers Danila Yurov and Jesper Wallstedt.

    Having a deep prospect pool is great, but it’s clear the Wild need to start winning and advancing past the first round in the postseason. While there is no indication that Kaprizov wishes to test free agency after his contract expires in 2026, it’s still paramount that they prove to him that they will contend by then. Does Guerin really want to keep adding to his prospect pool when those assets could be used now to improve his team?

    We certainly don't think so. And if free agency isn’t going to bring the Wild a difference-maker in their top six, perhaps they can accomplish this via trade? Sure, this involves giving up assets to acquire a player instead of just a contract in free agency. However, with their burgeoning prospect pool, there isn’t space for them all to fit into the roster in St. Paul. If there was ever a time to trade away futures for an impact player, now would be the time.

    It’s time to start identifying such targets. Given their cap constraints, the Wild would need to identify a player on a somewhat team-friendly deal with the idea of extending them at their market rate once they have the space starting next summer.

    With that, our first target is Nikolaj Ehlers of the Winnipeg Jets. Yes, I know what you’re thinking: there is no way two divisional rivals would entertain involving a player as dynamic as Ehlers. And you wouldn’t be wrong. However, Ehlers is exactly the type of player the Wild can/should be targeting. While not likely, Guerin would be wise to overpay in this situation if needed.

    First, let's look at why Ehlers is the perfect target for the Wild. He has one year remaining on his contract at a $6 million cap hit. As a perennial 25-goal scorer with elite speed, Ehlers likely will deserve a raise as he looks for a new contract at age 29. Winnipeg’s extensions to Mark Scheifele and Connor Hellebuyck kick in this season. Key players such as Sean Monahan, Tyler Toffoli, and skilled youngster Cole Perfetti are due new contracts this summer. Even when projecting into next summer, Winnipeg may extend the likes of Alex Iafallo, Gabe Vilardi, Mason Appleton, and Vladislav Namestnikov over Ehlers.

    Why? Because Ehlers’ ice time with the Jets has been a bit perplexing over the years. Just this last year, Ehlers was perhaps at his best, recording 25 goals and 36 assists, not to mention being a career-best +27. But Ehlers found himself in a similar spot on Winnipeg’s pecking order as year’s past when sending players over the boards, ranking 12th overall in average time on ice, and 7th among forwards. That ice time fell below that of Appleton, Kyle Lowry, and Vilardi – all three of which Ehlers nearly doubled in point totals.

    When you watch him play, it’s hard to imagine why Winnipeg’s coaching staff didn’t use him more.

    

    Ehlers is a dynamic skater and puck carrier, making him a true threat on the rush. Last year, the Wild struggled in this area when the puck was on the stick of nearly everyone except Kaprizov.

    

    When comparing Ehlers' skillset to that of the options in free agency, it’s easy to see why he would be worth parting with future assets to get. Now that Winnipeg’s coach, Rick Bowness, has announced his retirement, maybe the new coach will see Ehlers in a better light and wish to make him a larger part of their offense. If not, Ehlers may be wise to look for a new team to offer him more opportunity.

    What would it take for the Wild to acquire Ehlers? Lucky for Guerin, he has a good comparison to start with from his trade of dynamic scorer Kevin Fiala to Los Angeles a few summers ago. Fiala was coming off an 85-point season, and Guerin could parlay that into the No. 19 overall pick in that summer’s draft and second-round prospect Brock Faber.

    Of course, knowing what we know now about Faber, the Los Angeles Kings would have likely preferred to include another prospect. But at the time, the trade value for a dynamic scoring winger was set at a mid-first-round pick plus a second-tier prospect. If that is the case now, Ehlers would likely harbor a similar return for Winnipeg. Given that the Wild are a divisional rival, they would likely need to offer a little more than every other team.

    Would a jump up to the 13th overall pick next month be the sweetener needed on top of the 19th overall pick the Wild acquired from trading Fiala? Money would also need to move out, so perhaps the Jets would be interested in acquiring Filip Gustavsson as the backup to Vezina finalist Helleybuck to replace losing Laurent Brossoit in free agency? If they add in one of their many blue-line prospects, the Wild certainly have a package enticing enough for Winnipeg to send Ehlers to Minnesota.

    Ehlers would be the perfect fit into the Wild’s top six, and the pieces are in place should Guerin want to get creative with the open spot on the left wing of the second line. Ehlers would be the best option available should Winnipeg look to trade him this summer.

     

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    No more Euros please.

    Never durable, physical, or consistent. I'd rather have guys like Brett Howden or Jack Roslovic for less AAV.

    Not dynamic or flashy. The Wild need balance, not more highly-skilled Euros. Probably why Bowness didn't like him.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    No the wild need to get rid of all those old slow players like  17  24 36 46 89 90    we need to get younger and way faster. But Blunder Billy  is so stuck on his GOOD OLD AND SLOW BOYS CLUB I should add always getting hurt to 

    • Like 2
    • Confused 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    A good idea might be to keep what we have and work with it.  Perron etc. on 1-year deals may not be everyone's cup of tea, but they are trade bait if things don't work.  You don't trade for bigger pieces if you don't things are going to work out immediately.  Trading for someone we don't know will work in our system throws away stuff that we know already has some chemistry (i.e. all the Rossi stuff).

    Having the buyout noose around the neck is still worth remembering.  You're down a hole, and trading out of it now just throws away easy depth (or maybe better) pieces to give that money to anyway.

    Edited by Citizen Strife
    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Glenn said:

    I rather watch young and fast  then old and slow

    Ehlers is currently 28 and has speed. I'm not sure of your argument here. 28 is not old. 

    However, 6' 172 is pretty light. Ehlers has had some good scoring years and is about a career .7 ppg player. However, he is another small player, of which we have plenty.

    I don't really care for the idea. Ehlers also has a tendency to disappear in the playoffs, who needs another one of those? 14 points in 37 games and only 4 goals. That tells me that when the intensity ramps up, as well as physicality, Ehlers doesn't adapt well to that. 

    Based upon this, I could see Ehlers definitely being available. I've loved his speed and believe he is a dangerous player, but as I look into it, he's got a lot of red flags and is not even an RHS. While on paper, he looks like a definite upgrade over Johansson (and you could say that about most players), he also doesn't have the greatest durability track record either. 

    For me, I think we need an RHS, a larger body and a younger guy. I can give a little on the RHS for this player, but we do need to balance that out in another player, and have to have someone who can play in Ovechkin's office. Tkachuk is still the one I'd target and hard. McTavish is another player I'd go hard after especially if Tkachuk falls through.

    • Like 3
    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Monohan's lack of games played recently has me leery.  He hasn't played 70 games in over 5 years, and for a team that dealt with everything last year, adding another injury risk doesn't sound the greatest.  Teravainen might be out of the range, but maybe they would take Gus as part of a package back to make it a the money more doable.  He's 50-60 pt potential on a good year...but who knows.

     

    Edited by Citizen Strife
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Edit to above: Teravainen is a UFA this offseason...well, deal Gus anyway, get something back, and his asking price seems a bit more attainable.

    As it stands, they are in the $3-4m range with the stuff left to give to Rossi's bonuses, Chisholm and Shaw (maybe one or both), so Teravainen would be one of those "Get rid of a couple people" to take a stab at a $5-6m player instead).

    Edited by Citizen Strife
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 hours ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    Perhaps Teravainen, but I'm guessing he would be tougher to get.

    Teravainen plays a small game, I don't think he solves our problems. Necas would be far better.

    Teravainen is listed at 5'11" 193. That's not small, he's more of a middleweight. However, he plays a very finesse game, so he plays lighter than he is, kind of like Johansson does. 

    He's also quite streaky. There are times where he is in a scoring desert. He doesn't get out of that quickly.

    Edited by mnfaninnc
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    Teravainen plays a small game, I don't think he solves our problems. Necas would be far better.

    That's fair, though I was only looking at unrestricted free agents under $6M. Necas is restricted and projected at $7M+, so not sure he fits on the 24-25 Wild roster.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 hours ago, Citizen Strife said:

    Monohan's lack of games played recently has me leery.  He hasn't played 70 games in over 5 years, and for a team that dealt with everything last year, adding another injury risk doesn't sound the greatest.

    Monahan's injury history is what makes him affordable. He just played 83 regular season games this season, however, and 5 playoff games.

    Don't think he's not old enough to be washed up yet. If you could get him on a 1 year deal, he could payoff nicely, but I wouldn't suggest anything long-term.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    OMG.  Marcus Johansson  has the speed we desperately need!   How did that work out?

    No.  Just no.  Don't care about his speed.  Don't care.  Don't care.  Don't care.

    Professional sports has been filled with one dimensional speed players who could not do ****.  Just stop it.

    We need size!  We need speed! Trade Rossi, he is too small!  I have fallen in love with one dimension!  

    I can't take it.

    Next headline:  The Wild should Trade for the Corpse of Maurice Rocket Richard!  The Wild should try to put Gregor "The Mountain" Clegane on skates!

    The Wild should dump every overpaid old fart they can.  The Wild should give playing time to their young prospects and see who rises to the top.  The Wild should quit trying to win meaningless games for one-and-out playoff runs and build for the future.

    I had season tickets but instead of giving someone with a future a chance, I watched Johansson, Goligoski, Merrill, Gaudreau, and Flower.  It was not worth $105 a game.  It was not worth $20 a game.

    Enough already.  Give me multifaceted players with skill who work hard.  I would rather watch a dozen Mason Shaws skate their hearts out than another fast Johansson who could give two ****s.

    Edited by Dis-allowed display name
    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1
    • Haha 1
    • Confused 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Nohansson sucks, that's where we agree most. Almost just as much, the need for well-rounded players. 

    The bottom line has been the same for a long time. If you can find equally fast, skilled players, your team benefits from bigger players versus smaller. It's also true your team benefits from NA players more than Euros. Hockey is not a pure skill or skating game. Otherwise how would Foligno or Matt Tkachuk ever make >4M in the NHL?

    Why are guys like Hanzal, Reaves, or Maroon always deadline acquisitions?Because teams need that for playoffs.

    So why not just build your team that way to sstart. MN is now in position to do that. There's assets and money coming up allowing them to get back at even keel with some really good players under contract.

    Gus and Wallstedt have a year to prove themselves while Fleury fizzles. Any of MN's picks that wanna make it just have to do a Lundell, Jarvis, Mercer, Johnston, etc. and simply make the team by being that good. Now if Cross-eyed Bill holds them out for Fred & NoJo, then we know he's gone full-retard and all hope is lost.

    • Like 4
    • Confused 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 hours ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    Necas is restricted and projected at $7M+, so not sure he fits on the 24-25 Wild roster.

    That would mean money would need to go out too. We'd have to trade for him. It would likely be expensive.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    20 minutes ago, Protec said:

    Now if Cross-eyed Bill holds them out for Fred & NoJo, then we know he's gone full-retard and all hope is lost.

    But, the kids have got to really beat these guys out and climb the ladder above them. There is the business side, and a guy guaranteed $2m can be buried in the A with NTCs. But, if you're going to pay that money down there, the guy coming up has got to be significantly better. 

    You can't just nudge out a vet, it's got to be a slam dunk win. And, to do this, a larger body is necessary. How these kids haven't been bulking up in the gym is beyond my comprehension. It's like they don't want a regular NHL job! 

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    13 minutes ago, Citizen Strife said:

    Also, no reason for that kind of language, Protec.  I'm all for fucks and shits, but saying Guerin that is quite a bit much.

    We'll have to agree to disagree on that. One naughty word okay, not another don't make no sense.

    Bottom line for the Wild, they've got a lot of good UFAs to look at. Various prices and lots of 27-31 age guys. Guerin needs to shuffle the roster and get the ball rolling for 2025-26.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    23 hours ago, Citizen Strife said:

    Also, no reason for that kind of language, Protec.  I'm all for fucks and shits, but saying Guerin that is quite a bit much.

    Not sure what word you're referring to?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 5/13/2024 at 10:22 AM, Citizen Strife said:

    Retard

    I think what we're looking at here is a word that was perfectly legitimate as a cutdown in a different era. I'm of that era and just breezed right through the post without thinking anything of it. 

    This would be a normal expression that, if said, and people give you dirty looks, at least for me, I'd be like 🤷‍♂️, what happened? This is the extension of my social media dive, I don't really get into all of the things you can and can't say anymore.

    There's been such a change of rules in things, I really just don't even recognize things anymore. I don't think Protec was trying to offend anyone with the phrase, but, it is Protec and sometimes he goes over the line.....on purpose. Maybe he wants to re-change his moniker? 1700+ post is probably a record right now! 

    Anyway, I have not kept up really on what is acceptable and what isn't anymore. Does it get me into trouble in face to face conversations? Yeah, it probably does. I guess you can have those attitudes, you just can't say them anymore? I'm sure I'll end up doing the same thing at some point, I do hope all will understand I'm old, and have an older person's vocabulary.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It's more that equating Guerin to a person of stunted development is pretty off-base.  I mean, he runs a professional hockey team that has had one losing season or so in his tenure...labeling him like a disabled person is just a bit much.

    It's almost like saying, "He ruined my hockey team, I hope he fucking dies in a fire."  Same deal.  Pretty damn harsh and a bit much because we like sports.

    Note: words are words, and that's all they are.  Still, having disdain for a person to that kind of degree says more about you than it does them.  I deal with wrestling fans.  They are hardly the most...logically and reasonable people either.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 5/11/2024 at 8:43 AM, Protec said:

    No more Euros please.

    Never durable, physical, or consistent. I'd rather have guys like Brett Howden or Jack Roslovic for less AAV.

    Not dynamic or flashy. The Wild need balance, not more highly-skilled Euros. Probably why Bowness didn't like him.

    This absolutely is true in Ehlers case. I had him for fantasy and he was a bandaid. He was hurt often before this year too.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 5/11/2024 at 11:20 AM, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    Sean Monahan might be a decent target. He isn't projected to make a ton in free agency, but has some history of scoring. Perhaps Teravainen, but I'm guessing he would be tougher to get.

    Monahan wouldn’t be bad but Turbo Teravainen is always hurt. When he’s on he’s decent but very inconsistent as well.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 5/11/2024 at 11:44 AM, Citizen Strife said:

    Monohan's lack of games played recently has me leery.  He hasn't played 70 games in over 5 years, and for a team that dealt with everything last year, adding another injury risk doesn't sound the greatest.  Teravainen might be out of the range, but maybe they would take Gus as part of a package back to make it a the money more doable.  He's 50-60 pt potential on a good year...but who knows.

     

    How are ppl figuring it would be ok to trade Gus and be stable with goaltending? Flower  is an old broke down shell of himself and the Wall hasn’t had anywhere near enough time to develop and see if he’s good enough at the moment to be a consistent nhl goalie. Just because he shut out the hawks, which were one of the worst defensive team in the league? With this teams very sub par defense I could see it being a disaster.

    you want to ease players with that potential into the league, not throw them in and hope he doesn’t sink. 2 nhl games isn’t enough.

     

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...