Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness
  • The Wild Are Showing Us What They Are


    Image courtesy of © John Jones - USA TODAY Sports
    Tom Schreier

    In the offseason, the Minnesota Wild signed three veterans to multi-year contracts to establish cost certainty and keep their core together. First, they signed Mats Zuccarello, 36, to a two-year, $8.25 million team-friendly contract. Then they inked Marcus Foligno, 32, to a four-year, $16 million extension, which was more player-friendly. Finally, Ryan Hartman, 29, signed for three years, $12 million. 

    "I like having cost certainty going forward," Bill Guerin said on October 7, five days before the season started. "These three guys have all expressed how much they wanted to stay here. We wanted to keep them."

    The Wild chose their direction. They had two options during the worst of the Zach Parise and Ryan Suter buyout years. They could go young and bank on upside or rely on a veteran core to carry them through the worst of the buyout penalties. Minnesota chose the low-floor option. They finished with over 100 points in the last two seasons. Why not try to build off that?

    The biggest downside was that veteran players and cost certainty is that the Wild are committed to two players on the wrong side of 30. They’d probably extend Zuccarello under most circumstances. His play has aged gracefully, and he maximizes Kirill Kaprizov on the top line. Most teams would wisely cater to their star player, and Kaprizov is close to Zuccarello on and off the ice. They also signed Hartman through his prime. Hartman isn’t a true No. 1 center, but he’s a glue guy that most teams want to keep around. But only a few would commit to one long-term unless they were in a cap crunch.

    However, the combination of signing Foligno into his mid-30s and locking all three players in simultaneously means committing to a core that has been productive in the regular season but fallen short in the playoffs. The Wild have lost to a division rival in the first round for each of the past three years. They haven’t made it out of the first round since the 2014-15 season, when the dynastic Chicago Blackhawks eliminated them in the second round for the second consecutive year. By committing to a core that hasn’t proven anything yet, Minnesota may allow history to repeat itself.

    Guerin didn’t seem to get it last year after the Dallas Stars eliminated the Wild in four games. “Our players and our coaches deserve a lot of credit because they're fighting with one hand tied between their back because of these cap restraints,” he said. “We don't apologize for it. We're fine with it.” 

    However, he was upset that people brought up Minnesota’s past playoff failures with his current group. "There's been this narrative out there that right now the Wild can't get past the first round, and I can understand the frustration, but there are a small handful of players that have been here for a lot of that. Most of them are new. In my mind, that's not the narrative of this team."

    "I refuse to hold our players that are new here responsible for what's happened in the past."

    Guerin then bickered with a reporter over whether it was significant for the Wild to advance to the second round. “They're not going to put our name on the Stanley Cup to get to the second round,” he offered. “They're not going to give us a ring. But you know what, that's not our goal. Our goal is not to make it to the second round. Is it going to feel any better? It's not.”

    He has since made an effort to clean up those comments. But his actions suggest that he hasn’t learned anything from Chuck Fletcher, his predecessor. Fletcher locked in a core that didn’t have playoff success, and it never got further than the second round. Guerin has committed to an older core and a coach who hasn’t had playoff success while expecting the team to build upon what they did last year.

    If the Wild are going to supersede what they’ve done in the past, they’re banking on Kirill Kaprizov to carry them. They’re also hoping that young players with upside, like Matt Boldy, Marco Rossi, and Brock Faber, will continue to improve. Boldy, Rossi, and Faber should continue to ascend. But they’re surrounded by players who are what they are and may decline soon – if they’re not already.

    Boldy and Jared Spurgeon got injured early this season, but no team should be that reliant on two players. They are foundational pieces. Still, if their absence is holding the Wild back this much, Minnesota has made them Jenga blocks that are too far up the tower. We all know that Boldy and Spurgeon’s absence alone isn’t holding them back. It’s an aging, flawed core that started slow and flamed out in the playoffs last year. And they haven’t shown us that they’re any better this year. 

    The harsh reality is they might be getting worse.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 2

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    The similarities between Rod Brind 'Amour and Mikko Koivu are interesting. When Carolina won the Stanley Cup, Ron Francis was already part of the front office, and Brind 'Amour was about to retire. Koivu has since retired for a couple of seasons and is toiling in the front office right now. 

    I think Koivu did an excellent job of mentoring Granlund and Ek into the players they became. He's got some coaching talent. Brind 'Amour had the respect of every single player in Carolina's organization, he was a legend. Koivu has that same standing with us, maybe even more so with his lengthy captaincy. 

    But, when would he get that coaching experience? I'd suggest he gets it right now by becoming director of player personnel-forwards unit. Here he would be emphasizing the 200' game, positioning in the defensive zone, draws and strategies, and many other details the kids don't get yet. He would travel around, spend time in Europe, with the Hearlanders and baby Wild along with developing guys like Rossi, Boldy, and further with Ek, and maybe a couple of visits to jrs. teams. 

    We have a certain system we play in, and it's a system that is fully team oriented. For that to happen, everyone needs to be on the same page. Incidentally, we also need this same position with the defense. These kids need both team coaching and personal development coaching.  I think a good way for Koivu to start making his front office mark is to get involved in this way.  Perhaps he and Modano could work as a team where Modano could go over some offensive strategies and the importance of developing more footspeed.  They would be a great forward tandem mini clinic team, and both have to be respected due to their long and successful playing careers.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Quote

    We all know that Boldy and Spurgeon’s absence alone isn’t holding them back.

    I do not know this. Spurgeon led the team in +/- by a mile last season while Boldy was 2nd in goals and 3rd in both total points and power play points.

    You take the team captain top defenseman, along with the 2nd best goal scorer off of any roster, chances are pretty good they will not win as often. A team in that situation is likely to give up more goals and score less.

    Allowing more goals and scoring less is an obvious recipe for losing. If Spurgeon and Boldy come back at full strength, it will likely have immediate ramifications for the entire roster and have them climbing the standings.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    13 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    Dean, I get your venting. But let's get to reality. OCL demanded that his teams make the playoffs, so a tear down and build up was not possible from that standpoint. You'd need a different owner to follow that logic. 

    Guerin took the job knowing that he had to field a competitive team. By definition, a competitive team is fighting for a playoff spot with 10 games to play. Guerin's teams have overperformed this standard each year. 

    Guerin then had to draft better than everyone else somewhere in the late teens to early 20s. He caught a break with the pandemic which jumbled all prospects up and another break when Judd became available. Now, guys draft there do not typically become stars, but they do become solid players, but, due to the pandemic, we could get more stars out of that group. 

    But, your beef is with the coaching, and that is mine too. Before we ever extended Dean, an extension I believe was earned, I pointed out his dismal track record in playoff series for his whole professional coaching career. Was he the right guy for the job? He earned his extension, but he was only the right guy for the job as long as he kept improving the kids. He hasn't been doing that lately. His teams don't win draws, don't kill penalties, don't score on must needed PPs (and sometimes refuse to shoot), and take periods off. Oh, lest we forget, they don't particularly like to practice either. 

    I would say his message has grown stale, and he is not getting the response he needs from his players. So, if he's gone, Dean, this is the question, the only question: Who takes his place?????

    I've got 2 names on my list: Mike Sullivan and Gerard Gallant. Gallant is available now, Sullivan is still a Penguin. Anyone else want to add a name? And I'd also suggest that Darby Hendrickson and Woods might have to be replaced as well.

    I would throw in Joe Sacco and Meghan Duggan. Meghan has done amazing things with player development in New Jersey and Joe has been solid as an assistant coach on the Bruins for 9 years.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    17 hours ago, Dean said:

    Ek Brodin and Faber are only ones I see bringing  it consistently .

    I'd add Rossi to that list.  He's definitely been pushing hard and digs out pucks.  He's not the passive player he was last year.  I wish he was a little bigger so he could body people a little more, but he seems to have taken a bit from Spurgeon on how to effectively defend at a smaller stature.  Spurgeon is still quite a bit ahead of him, but he's doing some of the same things.

    Also, it's hard to say that Dewar isn't bringing it every shift too.

    But yeah, that's only enough to put 5 on the ice.

    I think others are definitely putting in effort, Kaprizov for instance.  But he's too much in his own head second-guessing everything he's doing that he isn't playing like he can.

    • Like 5
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    15 hours ago, Protec said:

    The Wild have to repair the special teams play and get some consistency going. Those things are making it look worse than it is, but...

    Expecting good netminding and a PP goal more than 1 in 10, or a PK more than 1 in 3 isn't too much.

    I think it was mnfaninnc that mentioned how we park Ek in the middle for cleanup on PPs and then put everyone else on the perimeter.  The opposing team boxes up and doesn't open up to give us any good lanes for shots.  I believe he hit the nail square on the head.  To solve this, I think we need another forward shifting in and out with Ek to keep opening the defense up (Hartman?, Boldy?).  If we are just going to keep shooting from the perimeter straight into a pile of defenders that barely has to move around, our PP is going to continue to be bad.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    23 hours ago, TheGoosesAreLooses said:

    Meghan has done amazing things with player development in New Jersey

    This one came out of left field a little bit for me, and is definitely and out of the box kind of candidate. While hockey is hockey, there are some stark differences between the women's game and the men's game. 

    So, I had to do a quick little tutorial on Wikipedia to find out a little more. Meghan does have a little coaching experience with Clarkson University, though it didn't say if it was an assistant role or the head role. I assume it was assistant since she was still actively playing. She's also had an administrative role with the player development in NJ. 

    So, my questioning starts with: Are the players willing to accept and respect a female head coach? This candidate coach has very little coaching experience and none on the professional level. Will the players buy into a system designed by a coach with no experience? Regardless of gender here, this would be a huge question. 

    So, Gooses, my question to you on this topic is what do you see in Duggan that I'm not seeing in the brief introduction? Please explain the details of "amazing things" in the player development.  For instance, I'm looking at Alex Holtz and wondering why he hasn't progressed so quickly. She's only been on this job for a couple of years.  

    I think Joe Sacco is a decent target. I would have to imagine, though, that doing this in season would be difficult, so this would likely be an offseason change.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    This one came out of left field a little bit for me, and is definitely and out of the box kind of candidate. While hockey is hockey, there are some stark differences between the women's game and the men's game. 

    So, I had to do a quick little tutorial on Wikipedia to find out a little more. Meghan does have a little coaching experience with Clarkson University, though it didn't say if it was an assistant role or the head role. I assume it was assistant since she was still actively playing. She's also had an administrative role with the player development in NJ. 

    So, my questioning starts with: Are the players willing to accept and respect a female head coach? This candidate coach has very little coaching experience and none on the professional level. Will the players buy into a system designed by a coach with no experience? Regardless of gender here, this would be a huge question. 

    So, Gooses, my question to you on this topic is what do you see in Duggan that I'm not seeing in the brief introduction? Please explain the details of "amazing things" in the player development.  For instance, I'm looking at Alex Holtz and wondering why he hasn't progressed so quickly. She's only been on this job for a couple of years.  

    I think Joe Sacco is a decent target. I would have to imagine, though, that doing this in season would be difficult, so this would likely be an offseason change.

    Yeah the development of Holtz hasn't been fantastic. But what about the Hughes brothers both Luke and Jack? Nico Hirscher development from 21-23? Kevin Bahl? Mercer from 21-23? 

    Look at the progression of these guys from 21-23. All of them have come a long ways from their first year. It is a young team with what is clearly a great development program. I would necessarily put her at head coach but she would be great for the development of our up and comers. I don't think the newer generation reacts the same way to guys like Evason, Guerin and Mclean. The days of tough love are long gone and they don't seem to maximize the players anymore. 

    Look at what Torts has done in Philly. He has a very modern style of coaching and that team has exploded, with the same players and mostly the same systems as last year. Look at how our team seemingly reacts to Dean in post season and to start the season. Not well. We start slow and often get down on ourselves. Deano's policy of not being in the room needs to change. He cannot just say the players are saying all the right things and leave it at that.

    I think our GM and Coach are living in the past as evidenced by signing Fleury and Reaves, I don't think they are progressive and I don't think their style is conducive to fostering growth in our younger players. Guys with the right attitude coming in will thrive (Rossi, Boldy, Faber) but IMO we will miss out on some solid players with their hard line style.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, TheGoosesAreLooses said:

    Yeah the development of Holtz hasn't been fantastic. But what about the Hughes brothers both Luke and Jack? Nico Hirscher development from 21-23? Kevin Bahl? Mercer from 21-23? 

    Look at the progression of these guys from 21-23. All of them have come a long ways from their first year. It is a young team with what is clearly a great development program.

    Ok, but let's look at this a little closer. Some of these guys are top of the draft guys. Their talent alone has a lot to do with the success. I'll give you Bahl, I've liked him for awhile and wanted us to trade for him as a 2nd redwood on D. 

    But where could she actually go? Anything we could offer at this point would be like a lateral move. If you're going to pluck someone, you've got to give them a better opportunity. I don't think we're replacing Guerin at this point. 

    Now, if she were a free agent, well, that might change things. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    19 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    Ok, but let's look at this a little closer. Some of these guys are top of the draft guys. Their talent alone has a lot to do with the success. I'll give you Bahl, I've liked him for awhile and wanted us to trade for him as a 2nd redwood on D. 

    But where could she actually go? Anything we could offer at this point would be like a lateral move. If you're going to pluck someone, you've got to give them a better opportunity. I don't think we're replacing Guerin at this point. 

    Now, if she were a free agent, well, that might change things. 

    Not every top of the draft guy develops though. NJD have had great success in not only drafting well but also developing well and I hardly think that has nothing to do with the Director of Player Development. Meghan has been a proven winner throughout her career at every level and is clearly bringing something with her to this program. 

    Not saying she would be available or easy to get, only to say I think she could be a big asset with our prospect pool 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, TheGoosesAreLooses said:

    Not every top of the draft guy develops though. NJD have had great success in not only drafting well but also developing well and I hardly think that has nothing to do with the Director of Player Development. Meghan has been a proven winner throughout her career at every level and is clearly bringing something with her to this program. 

    Not saying she would be available or easy to get, only to say I think she could be a big asset with our prospect pool 

    I like the outside of the box thinking on it.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...