Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness
  • The Wild Are Caught In A Vicious Cycle


    Image courtesy of Jeff Curry-USA TODAY Sports
    Tom Schreier

    In late November, the Minnesota Wild won their first four games under John Hynes and seven of eight after losing in Edmonton and Vancouver. They played their final two games of 2023 against the Winnipeg Jets and lost both, stifling any momentum they got from the new-coach bump. Those two losses to Winnipeg were the beginning of a stretch where they lost eight of nine games as they entered 2024.

    But they recovered to win three of their next four, only to lose to the Nashville Predators and Anaheim Ducks before the All-Star Break. They lost three straight to the Carolina Hurricanes, Nashville, and the St. Louis Blues before the trade deadline, turning them into sellers. Still, the Wild rolled into St. Louis having earned points in five straight games, moving within two points of a playoff spot. But the Blues beat them in a shootout and moved within one point of Minnesota in the standings. 

    “We didn't have our execution down today. That's all,” Marcus Foligno said after Sunday’s loss in St. Louis. “It's a team that's very beatable, and we didn't play to our standard. Third period was good. We had a good comeback.

    “Obviously, it's nice to get one, but we need two.”

    That’s been the Wild’s problem all year. They’re their own worst enemy. They’re Sisyphus pushing the rock up the hill; they fall short every time they must execute to sneak back into the playoff picture. Minnesota is playing a dangerous game, one they’ve committed to for a long time after Bill Guerin handed extensions with no-move clauses to almost every veteran on the roster the way Oprah gives away cars. The Wild stand on the precipice between qualifying for the Stanley Cup Playoffs and falling into the void of the mushy middle.

    The definition of insanity is doing the same thing repeatedly and expecting a different result. Minnesota plummeted to the bottom of the Western Conference standings under Dean Evason. Under Hynes, they started to emerge from Earth’s molten core, only to repeatedly fail to surface. It’s better to burn out than fade away, except in hockey, where Macklin Celebrini would look better in forest green than the 15th overall pick. 

    Minnesota had every reason to sell off its aging veterans and tank and focus on player development this year. But they couldn’t because Guerin locked Foligno, Mats Zuccarello, Ryan Hartman, and Frederick Gaudreau into long-term deals. Even if you think building a winning culture is more important than losing games to add another star to complement Kirill Kaprizov, what kind of environment is the Wild creating? 

    The NHL investigated Guerin for verbally abusing an employee. The Wild mutually parted ways with their cap guy in the middle of cap hell this season. They have erratically gone on long winning and losing streaks all year. The players appear to have built strong chemistry, and Hynes has kept them from bottoming out since taking over. But is that a good thing? Would it be wrong to shake things up with a team struggling to take the eighth seed in the West? Do we think they’ll execute in Vancouver or Denver in April when they struggle to beat St. Louis in March?

    Hockey is a weird sport. The Wild could wriggle their way into the playoffs and upset someone. But it’s hard to see them repeatedly beating the best teams in the West in a seven-game series when they come up short against division rivals in important regular-season games. Minnesota hasn’t won a playoff series since the 2014-15 season, and they have lost in the first round seven of the past eight seasons. 

    Guerin is making the same mistake Chuck Fletcher made before him, just in a different way. Fletcher committed to Zach Parise and Ryan Suter, who are good hockey players but not All-Stars like Marian Gaborik or Kaprizov. He soldered a flawed young core together, committing to them before they were proven, and got stuck in no-man’s land. Guerin has done the same with older players without securing Kaprizov past the 2025-26 season. The Wild look like they’ve entered a vicious cycle, and it’s hard to see how they escape it.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 1
    • Confused 2

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    18 hours ago, raithis said:

    "Think you could write a story like this?"

    Apparently that's taken literally at times.  I feel like I've read that same article on multiple occasions.  It's a vicious recycle of sorts.  One might suggest that it validates the assertions being made, but that's only if the other parts of the picture are again ignored - the biggest part of that picture being the patience for the prospects we have to develop and displace some of the veteran players to lesser roles or off the roster entirely.

    That's not to slag on the writers because there are a lot of interesting takes too and I really do appreciate that.  Tony himself has written a lot of good articles, as have many of the other writers.  I'd like to see Luke, Kalisha, and Justin write a little more often, and I certainly don't want Tony to stop writing.

    I may not always agree with everyone's perspective, but I like the thought process.  What I don't like is beating a dead horse just for the sake of beating it rather than realistic, thorough analysis that supports the point being made, regardless of whether I agree with it.

    It's not beating a dead horse if there is a cycle the wild perpetually fall into.

    Last 10 to 15 years the wilds mo has been the same and the results are the same. 

    I think alot of people see the pattern and want to see change. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    20 hours ago, Mateo3xm said:

    You can't be serious? I like the enthusiasm but you seriously think the Wild have any chance of competing for a Stanley Cup in 2025? That's absolutely crazy.

    this team is a mess defensively, shaky on goaltending and the core is past their prime. The new players don't typically really hit their peak till age 24-26. there is a big gap between the up and coming players and the core players

    Flower is 40, Zucc is 37, Foligno is 33, Hartman is 30, Bogosian is 34, Brodin is 31, Johansson is 34, Freddy is 31, Merell is 30.

    Statistically at age 29 players start to decline. Now obviously that doesn't mean everyone but that's a lot of holes to fill and not enough prospects ready to take their place.

     

    Lol. The core is Kaprizov, Boldy and Ek and Brodin, Spurgeon and Faber on the blue line.  Only Spurgeon is past his prime.  This team is primed to contend from 26-30 if we can resign Kaprizov. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...