Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness
  • The Wild Are Caught In A Vicious Cycle


    Image courtesy of Jeff Curry-USA TODAY Sports
    Tom Schreier

    In late November, the Minnesota Wild won their first four games under John Hynes and seven of eight after losing in Edmonton and Vancouver. They played their final two games of 2023 against the Winnipeg Jets and lost both, stifling any momentum they got from the new-coach bump. Those two losses to Winnipeg were the beginning of a stretch where they lost eight of nine games as they entered 2024.

    But they recovered to win three of their next four, only to lose to the Nashville Predators and Anaheim Ducks before the All-Star Break. They lost three straight to the Carolina Hurricanes, Nashville, and the St. Louis Blues before the trade deadline, turning them into sellers. Still, the Wild rolled into St. Louis having earned points in five straight games, moving within two points of a playoff spot. But the Blues beat them in a shootout and moved within one point of Minnesota in the standings. 

    “We didn't have our execution down today. That's all,” Marcus Foligno said after Sunday’s loss in St. Louis. “It's a team that's very beatable, and we didn't play to our standard. Third period was good. We had a good comeback.

    “Obviously, it's nice to get one, but we need two.”

    That’s been the Wild’s problem all year. They’re their own worst enemy. They’re Sisyphus pushing the rock up the hill; they fall short every time they must execute to sneak back into the playoff picture. Minnesota is playing a dangerous game, one they’ve committed to for a long time after Bill Guerin handed extensions with no-move clauses to almost every veteran on the roster the way Oprah gives away cars. The Wild stand on the precipice between qualifying for the Stanley Cup Playoffs and falling into the void of the mushy middle.

    The definition of insanity is doing the same thing repeatedly and expecting a different result. Minnesota plummeted to the bottom of the Western Conference standings under Dean Evason. Under Hynes, they started to emerge from Earth’s molten core, only to repeatedly fail to surface. It’s better to burn out than fade away, except in hockey, where Macklin Celebrini would look better in forest green than the 15th overall pick. 

    Minnesota had every reason to sell off its aging veterans and tank and focus on player development this year. But they couldn’t because Guerin locked Foligno, Mats Zuccarello, Ryan Hartman, and Frederick Gaudreau into long-term deals. Even if you think building a winning culture is more important than losing games to add another star to complement Kirill Kaprizov, what kind of environment is the Wild creating? 

    The NHL investigated Guerin for verbally abusing an employee. The Wild mutually parted ways with their cap guy in the middle of cap hell this season. They have erratically gone on long winning and losing streaks all year. The players appear to have built strong chemistry, and Hynes has kept them from bottoming out since taking over. But is that a good thing? Would it be wrong to shake things up with a team struggling to take the eighth seed in the West? Do we think they’ll execute in Vancouver or Denver in April when they struggle to beat St. Louis in March?

    Hockey is a weird sport. The Wild could wriggle their way into the playoffs and upset someone. But it’s hard to see them repeatedly beating the best teams in the West in a seven-game series when they come up short against division rivals in important regular-season games. Minnesota hasn’t won a playoff series since the 2014-15 season, and they have lost in the first round seven of the past eight seasons. 

    Guerin is making the same mistake Chuck Fletcher made before him, just in a different way. Fletcher committed to Zach Parise and Ryan Suter, who are good hockey players but not All-Stars like Marian Gaborik or Kaprizov. He soldered a flawed young core together, committing to them before they were proven, and got stuck in no-man’s land. Guerin has done the same with older players without securing Kaprizov past the 2025-26 season. The Wild look like they’ve entered a vicious cycle, and it’s hard to see how they escape it.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 1
    • Confused 2

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Quote

    Guerin is making the same mistake Chuck Fletcher made before him, just in a different way. Fletcher committed to Zach Parise and Ryan Suter, who are good hockey players but not All-Stars like Marian Gaborik or Kaprizov.

    Yeah...that's not fair to Parise and KwikTrip.

    Those contracts aged like crap, but they were retroactively penalized by their frontloadedness. But in 2012, given the opportunity, every single GM in the league would have signed them.  Those contract's weren't seen as a noose when they were signed, but just the wild playing the same game everyone else was.

    • Like 5
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    “It’s hard to see how they escape it.”  I think that statement holds up very well…. Until the beginning of the 25-26 season. Why do I say that? Because the Wild have telegraphed their plan. It’s exceptionally clear, and is wrapped up in what GMBG believes as far as priorities….

    #1 Resign KK No brainer 

    #2 Integrate skill and speed on ELCs  I’d say looks good 

    #3 Get bigger. Stramel was a step in that direction and I think they will draft a big D this year. 

    #4 Quality goal tending. I’d say To be determined but treading in the right direction. 

    I’ll stop there. I think it’s reasonable to expect that the Wild will be contending for a SC in a big way starting in 2025. We very well could be entering into an unprecedented “Golden Era” of Wild hockey. 

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    21 minutes ago, Burnt Toast said:

    #3 Get bigger. Stramel was a step in that direction and I think they will draft a big D this year. 

    Depends on where they finish. If they're outside the top-12 then they'll probably be better off drafting a winger with size. A guy like Greentree or Nygard are more middle-6 than top-6ers but they come with NHL ready size at least. 

    The top defensemen probably aren't falling that far. Maybe the Russian guy just because of the KHL headache but also unlikely. 

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Why was Nojo on the penalty kill for that first goal.  When the D crossed over he got lost in space as everyone else rotated and we ended up short a low man for an easy goal by the Blues.  Either he needs to switch sides fast so the D can stay low or he needs to slide back to allow the Defender to step up.  He did neither.  His positioning was awful.  

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    23 minutes ago, MNCountryLife said:

    Why was Nojo on the penalty kill for that first goal.  When the D crossed over he got lost in space as everyone else rotated and we ended up short a low man for an easy goal by the Blues.  Either he needs to switch sides fast so the D can stay low or he needs to slide back to allow the Defender to step up.  He did neither.  His positioning was awful.  

    Yes. I posted the highlights of that. He never takes his eyes of the puck. He's not paying attention or anticipating anything. It's textbook going through the motions, followed by surprise shame. Embarrassing. STL throws movement into the play and MN stands totally still.

    NoJo could've picked up the player who skates through the middle. Instead, the guy just goes right to the back door as the pass arrives. Really nice play by STL to victimize the Wild PK.

    • Thanks 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Protec said:

    NoJo could've picked up the player who skates through the middle. Instead, the guy just goes right to the back door as the pass arrives. Really nice play by STL to victimize the Wild PK.

    Why not use Dino there? Why baby him in the game, why not see what he can do? Surely the PK was in the systems packet he was sent? Wouldn't it be worthwhile to use the new toys? He has little tape, so St. Louis had no idea how he'd react.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I simply can't buy what Tom is selling in this article. Yes, we could have gotten futures for the extended guys, but Guerin knows he wants those guys going forward. It's a risk to sell them as a rental and then resign them in the offseason (although, AZ has been pretty good at that). 

    Based on the actual prices that were paid at the deadline, I'm not sure we could have gotten what was being speculated in an earlier article either. Guys were going for far less than we thought. Teams weren't willing to give up those premium picks very easily. 

    Even if this team misses the playoffs this year, I think Guerin still likes the team and will be counting on a bounce back for next season. I can certainly see that logic. At the beginning, I thought we only really had room for 1 resigning. That would still be my opinion today as I would have rather resigned the Deweys who would have been far less expensive. Reality is that we needed open roster spots at the end of the year, and we also needed some veterans to show the youngens the way. I personally felt like the Deweys could have done that, but that's simply an arm chair opinion. 

    Now, this quote really bothers me:

    Quote

    “We didn't have our execution down today. That's all,” Marcus Foligno said after Sunday’s loss in St. Louis. “It's a team that's very beatable, and we didn't play to our standard. Third period was good. We had a good comeback.

    “Obviously, it's nice to get one, but we need two.”

    It bothers me in 2 aspects-

    1. How many games does it take to learn your lesson. You failed to do this with Winnipeg, with Nashville, with Dallas. I didn't see anyone breaking sticks over goal posts at the end of the game. I didn't see any emotion, throwing water bottles, coolers, kicking stuff on the way off the ice. Yes, it's being a sore loser, but, you need a couple of sore losers on your team that just can't stand losing
    2. In a game that is so important, how do you go through 1.5 periods with about 6 shots on goal? It's like you're not even trying! The whole team looked like they just woke up from their naps. How do you not get up for this game? This is a serious question, how do you not get up for this game and come out like gangbusters? You've got 15 games left and you're having to chase down a team way ahead of you. How do you not give a full balls out effort in each of these last 15 games???
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I totally agree with this article.  We'll researched and thought out.  Again we are stuck with a few too many players that just go through the motions.  Bill Guerin continues to support that approach.

    • Like 2
    • Confused 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, greg said:

    I totally agree with this article.  We'll researched and thought out.  Again we are stuck with a few too many players that just go through the motions.  Bill Guerin continues to support that approach.

    The Country Club tagline: It's about f#@%ing winning....

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Why does every fan assume that if their team tanks they will get #1 overall pick for 3 consecutive years?  Statistically speaking tanking doesn't work. There have been dozens of tanks in the last twenty years and only 2 or 3 have worked. I would much rather watch decent hockey year after year than horrible hockey for a 1 out of 15 chance of winning the cup. It's illogical but that's hardly surprising. We are sports fans after all.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 2
    • Confused 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 hours ago, Citizen Strife said:

    I thought this was a Tony article the whole time...

    "Think you could write a story like this?"

    Apparently that's taken literally at times.  I feel like I've read that same article on multiple occasions.  It's a vicious recycle of sorts.  One might suggest that it validates the assertions being made, but that's only if the other parts of the picture are again ignored - the biggest part of that picture being the patience for the prospects we have to develop and displace some of the veteran players to lesser roles or off the roster entirely.

    That's not to slag on the writers because there are a lot of interesting takes too and I really do appreciate that.  Tony himself has written a lot of good articles, as have many of the other writers.  I'd like to see Luke, Kalisha, and Justin write a little more often, and I certainly don't want Tony to stop writing.

    I may not always agree with everyone's perspective, but I like the thought process.  What I don't like is beating a dead horse just for the sake of beating it rather than realistic, thorough analysis that supports the point being made, regardless of whether I agree with it.

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    15 hours ago, Patrick said:

    Why does every fan assume that if their team tanks they will get #1 overall pick for 3 consecutive years?  Statistically speaking tanking doesn't work. There have been dozens of tanks in the last twenty years and only 2 or 3 have worked. I would much rather watch decent hockey year after year than horrible hockey for a 1 out of 15 chance of winning the cup. It's illogical but that's hardly surprising. We are sports fans after all.

    I think if you look at some of the teams around, they assume that they can be built that way. It is assumed that TBL went this route, getting Stamkos and Hedman, but the true talent of TBL were the other picks especially hitting on non-first rounders. They also made some very good trades taking advantage of teams in cap trouble.

    They also look at Pittsburgh which is an anomaly. Pittsburgh was really bad and got Sid, but they also were really bad when there was a lockout and got to pick b2b top. Getting Fleury and Malkin around Sid made them really, really good, only having to be bad for 2 seasons. 

    Now, you look at Edmonton with McDavid and Draisaitl and you overlook the painful years they went through drafting Yakupov and RNH and even Eberle. What you don't see are the whiffs they had in those drafts, drafting at the top of the rounds and coming away empty after the 1st. They should be a juggernaut right now.

    What about the Buffalos, Arizonas, Ottawas, Montreals and now Chicagos of the league who just want to fast forward through 5 seasons? And Buffalo once again started selling off their top assets. Every year they start out with the goal of making the playoffs, and on paper they look decent, but they just don't get there. Even Detroit went through pain after 20+ years of making the playoffs! But now, they look like they're ready to go. 

    I also think that some fans have a video game mentality where they can get immediate help and developing in the video game is usually successful. A lot more goes into that, and you have to hit on the lower picks too for it to really work. 

    Then there are some teams that never seem to go through these tanks. Say, for instance Boston. Somehow they've been able to maintain good play even after losing their top 2 Cs from last season. Vegas has really never known hard times, and they played their Expansion draft really well. 

    My research has shown that if you can draft in a 3 year period, 2 of those 3 years you hit on 3-4 draft picks, you can build a real contender for a long time. The 3rd year you'd probably get 2, but in doing this you've got a group of guys the same age with the same goals loyal to each other. Those teams tend to stick together. I did not research what happens if you trade for a guy in that draft, but I'd have to conclude that doing so will help. 

    If you look at our teams, the previous regime focused on the 2010 draft. He had some nice pieces from that draft that made the team. Fletcher's problem was he only got 1 year, and he needed another draft around that time that could produce 3-4 players who would make a significant contribution. He hit again in 2015 on this, but had nothing surrounding it. 

    For the 2020 draft, we've got Rossi, Dino, and Hunt who have debuted, and the traded for Faber. From 2019 we've got Boldy with question marks on Beckman, and Firstov. Hunter Jones was a bust. 

    From 2021, though, you've got Lambos, The Wall, Peart, Bankier, Masters, all who have maybes by their name. The problem is that outside of The Wall, these guys are just starting in the A this year. This could be one of those draft classes that pears with 2020, and, 2022 looks pretty good too. I would argue that this is the best way to build a team.

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 hours ago, raithis said:

    I'd like to see Luke, Kalisha, and Justin write a little more often

    Raithis, there are 2 Justins, are you talking about both?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The big tank mentality is kind of like a gamblers mentality.  For those who hit big, they look like a genius, and for the rest of those who miss, they look like a bunch of losers and fools.

    It comes down to generational talent.  If your big tank hits the generational talent then that is step one of the parlay.  It doesn't equate to a dynasty.  You have to hit many steps of that parlay.  

    It's a long shot gamble that requires years of intentional losing which once begun can turn into a decade for many teams who didn't hit big and have to chase it.

    It's a stupid bet and one you only take if you are in that singular position where your talent is aging and your pipeline is empty because you spent it all maximizing your window of opportunity.

    This constant default to "tanking" by media and fans for any team that is in the 'mushy middle' is more of a symptom of being irrational and upset from sports mania PTSD... or simply being a degenerate gambler as Tony Soprano used to say.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, mnfaninnc said:

    Raithis, there are 2 Justins, are you talking about both?

    Both I guess.  For some reason I only recall the one.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Will D. Ness said:

    The big tank mentality is kind of like a gamblers mentality.  For those who hit big, they look like a genius, and for the rest of those who miss, they look like a bunch of losers and fools.

    It comes down to generational talent.  If your big tank hits the generational talent then that is step one of the parlay.  It doesn't equate to a dynasty.  You have to hit many steps of that parlay.  

    It's a long shot gamble that requires years of intentional losing which once begun can turn into a decade for many teams who didn't hit big and have to chase it.

    It's a stupid bet and one you only take if you are in that singular position where your talent is aging and your pipeline is empty because you spent it all maximizing your window of opportunity.

    This constant default to "tanking" by media and fans for any team that is in the 'mushy middle' is more of a symptom of being irrational and upset from sports mania PTSD... or simply being a degenerate gambler as Tony Soprano used to say.

    There are times when it makes sense. I think with all the injuries this year and the lack of depth it would have made sense to try to add a top 5 guy with JEEK KK, Boldy, Rossi etc. etc. Bring up the young players give them legitimate opportunities. That wouldn't be a total tank, but it would have been a good year to add another high ender.

    • Like 2
    • Confused 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Vets were extended to ameliorate the precarious state of a half-hearted season. Guerin and the State don't have a tank in them. We have three top notch rookies with experience, will have two or three more next year, and a solid core of NHL pros. The question is have they been paid to endure this foundering, and to tank next year while youth gets real NHL seasoning and the Wild vie for high lottery? Does this mediocre play condition fans for an exciting but futile season in '25, the end of the buyout era?

    Bracket has done a extraordinary job of negotiating this unprecedented situation and there is no reason he doesn't help improve the team this off-season to avoid a full tank next year. This will be the NHL textbook case of rebuild on the fly. The team doesn't have the goaltending to make a run or they would've come in at 8 seed. That was the hope. Bring in all the black aces from near and far now, if permissable, and place vets on LTIR. Give them a taste and get the fan base excited for next year. 

    Btw, one can't imagine the maturing taking place for a character guy like O'Rourke to take on the burden he has has now in Iowa. You can't teach the hardening of Irish metal taking place within him. Their may be better players but the org has no better leader coming up. F' the bregrudgers. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Willy the poor boy said:

    There are times when it makes sense. I think with all the injuries this year and the lack of depth it would have made sense to try to add a top 5 guy with JEEK KK, Boldy, Rossi etc. etc. Bring up the young players give them legitimate opportunities. That wouldn't be a total tank, but it would have been a good year to add another high ender.

    True, but IMO we might have been better with the young guys. (Hunt and Beckman vs Merrill and NoJo).  

    Either way at least they would have gotten some development time.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 3/18/2024 at 11:32 AM, Burnt Toast said:

    . I think it’s reasonable to expect that the Wild will be contending for a SC in a big way starting in 2025. We very well could be entering into an unprecedented “Golden Era” of Wild hockey. 

    You can't be serious? I like the enthusiasm but you seriously think the Wild have any chance of competing for a Stanley Cup in 2025? That's absolutely crazy.

    this team is a mess defensively, shaky on goaltending and the core is past their prime. The new players don't typically really hit their peak till age 24-26. there is a big gap between the up and coming players and the core players

    Flower is 40, Zucc is 37, Foligno is 33, Hartman is 30, Bogosian is 34, Brodin is 31, Johansson is 34, Freddy is 31, Merell is 30.

    Statistically at age 29 players start to decline. Now obviously that doesn't mean everyone but that's a lot of holes to fill and not enough prospects ready to take their place.

     

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    22 hours ago, greg said:

    I totally agree with this article.  We'll researched and thought out.  Again we are stuck with a few too many players that just go through the motions.  Bill Guerin continues to support that approach.

    Completely agree

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    20 hours ago, Patrick said:

    Statistically speaking tanking doesn't work.

    Patrick,

    you need to lay off the bong hits if you think tanking doesn’t work. That’s incredibly ignorant to say. Something like 23 out of the last 25 year Stanley cup winners had at least one draft pick between pic 1-6.

    its an incredibly import part of the equation to win a cup. It’s obviously not the only important thing, you need incredible drafting, management, star players, a big team, depth and to make the right trades at the right time etc.

    i still don’t believe people actually think this bs when you look at who and what every Stanley cup winning team has.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...