Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness
  • Calen Addison And the Wild Need Each Other


    Image courtesy of Kim Klement-USA TODAY Sports
    Tony Abbott

    The Minnesota Wild have only one piece remaining to their offseason puzzle: Calen Addison. In the span of about a year, Addison went from being rumored to be the odd man out of the Wild's future, to running their power play, to being a healthy scratch for John Klingberg, to rumored trade bait again. After those remarkable twists and turns, Addison's current status as an RFA needing a contract is remarkably ordinary.

    The calendar is about to flip to September, and rosters are pretty set. So, too, is the range of salaries Addison could get on his next deal. Assuming Marco Rossi and Brock Faber make the roster, and there are no unforeseen shake-ups, the Wild have $1,643,079 in cap space remaining. Addison can make no more than that, and no less than the league minimum of $775K for this upcoming season.

    A gap of less than $900K isn't that large in the grand scheme of things, but it's also everything. The Wild are, presumably, going to want that number as close to the league minimum as possible. It's not out of character for a team to want to pay a player as little as humanly possible, but there's a greater urgency for Minnesota to do this with Addison. 

    Every dollar the Wild pay Addison is a dollar they don't have to play with the rest of the season. Signing Addison to the league minimum would allow the team to, say, carry a full 23-player roster (but only if that 23rd player is also at the league minimum). They will probably not use that flexibility as often as possible. However, any breathing room means they'll have an easier time navigating injuries, or not running over the cap with rookie bonuses.

    It's easy for people who aren't in Addison's skates and managing our actual careers to say that Addison should just take one for the team and sign a low deal to help them out. But isn't quite so easy for Addison. Evolving-Hockey projects a one-year pact for Addison to come in at around $1.05 million. $275K isn't much for Kirill Kaprizov or Matt "49 Sheets" Boldy. For Addison, it probably is, as it represents about 20% of his estimated career earnings on the table.

    It's further complicated by his demotion. The Wild bringing in Klingberg to run the power play had a secondary effect of putting a cap on Addison's point totals. Addison scored 29 points in 62 games last season. Presuming that pace would hold up over 80 games, he'd be coming off a 37-point year. Points are the biggest driver of salary in the NHL, so what little earning power Addison has was deflated by the move.

    Maybe it wouldn't have mattered, as Addison has zero leverage but his presence. He hasn't played enough games to be eligible for arbitration and is therefore unable to be presented with an offer sheet. The only right he has under the CBA is to say "no" to any contract he doesn't want.

    Addison seems happy to be with the Wild. He's trained with Minnesota's coaches over the offseason -- a pretty unusual thing for an unsigned player -- and participated in team activities, like Minnesota Wild night at Target Field earlier this week. That at least signals it's a mere matter of time before he and the team come to some sort of middle ground.

    The reason for that, and perhaps even the reason the Addison trade rumors haven't come to fruition despite the smoke is simple: They need each other too much. Minnesota is desperate for a power-play quarterback, and Addison is looking to put himself back on the map. Both parties offer the solution to the others' problems; Addison with his skill, and the Wild with a prime opportunity.

    Addison is now 23, and he's part of a 2018 defensive draft class that has already seen moving and shaking, particularly for the offensive defensemen. Worse yet, very few of these moves are working out. The New Jersey Devils traded Ty Smith (17th overall) to the division-rival Pittsburgh Penguins -- who sent him to Wilkes-Barre Scranton. Erik Karlsson is in the fold now, meaning Smith isn't running a power play anytime soon.

    Going further down the list, Ryan Merkley (21st) went from San Jose to Colorado (the AHL's Barracuda and Eagles, respectively) at the trade deadline, and Merkley's now in the KHL. Filip Johansson (24th) is nominally in the Vancouver Canucks system, but he spent all but three games in Sweden last year. Nicolas Beaudin (27th) is now with his second team, and in the AHL. Nils Lundkvist (28th) and Alexander Romanov (39th) are already on their second teams and not scoring much, with 16 and 22 points last year, respectively.

    Among these high-profile 2018 Draft defensemen, only Rasmus Sandin (29th, by the Toronto Maple Leafs) has taken advantage of being in a position to succeed with a new team. He has 15 points in 19 games with the Washington Capitals. For most of these other players, there wasn't a golden opportunity with their new squads.

    That means the only real shot Addison can count on is the one in front of him, and it's there for the taking. He'll have a tough time competing for even-strength minutes, with Jared Spurgeon and Faber ahead of him. That might not matter so much, because it'll allow Addison to get more sheltered minutes with Spurgeon and Faber taking on the toughest assignments. However, that was also the case last year, and Addison still got demoted.

    He'll need to tread water at even-strength (perhaps not such an easy task with Jon Merrill and Alex Goligoski as his partners) while quarterbacking the power play to a high level again. His power play skills combined with the team talent should be able to push him to 40 points in a full season. There are 31 defensemen who have put up a 40-point season at age-23 or under in the past decade. Only Will Butcher played himself out of the league. If he can get that kind of production, he'll probably find a place in someone's top-four defense unit.

    Maybe even the Wild's. Their need for a power play quarterback isn't going away anytime soon. Even a strong season should lead to a contract that gives them bang for the buck on Addison. If the team sees an Addison that can contribute in more game scenarios than 5-on-4 or 5-on-3, why wouldn't they want him for the next wave of Wild hockey?

    Anything can happen going forward, but for now, neither is in a position to do much else but work things out in short order. Addison and the Wild need each other too much for this deal to not get done.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Thanks 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    If Addy wants to keep playing this game, he'll be on the outside watching another prospective D-man get an opportunity. Plenty of minimum wage defenseman that will give anything to seize the opportunity. Addy has zero leverage and should be happy to be paid to play in the NHL. If he wants to make more money, show it on the ice. Make the Wild pay you because you're irreplaceable.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Addison's game is not confusing. The Wild know what his strengths and weaknesses are. Addison is a good contributor and the best option the Wild have for the powerplay quarterback and while he struggles a bit on defense in his own zone, the benefits he provides on the powerplay outweigh the costs of his defensive lapses. 

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    26 minutes ago, Luke Sims said:

    Addison's game is not confusing. The Wild know what his strengths and weaknesses are. Addison is a good contributor and the best option the Wild have for the powerplay quarterback and while he struggles a bit on defense in his own zone, the benefits he provides on the powerplay outweigh the costs of his defensive lapses. 

    I think this statement is where the biggest disagreement between the fanbase is. You are absolutely correct when the Wild know his strengths and weaknesses. However, it's the conclusion that we disagree on: "The benefits on the powerplay outweigh the costs of his defensive lapses."

    I am in the camp that does not believe this. When I see our PP go stagnant at the end of last year, I don't see it as a Klingberg/Spurgeon ineptitude, I see it as a Kaprizov/Ek missing. We don't know for sure, but I would say that Addison wouldn't have done much better in this scenario. 

    I am truly of the opinion that Addison is not doing the Wild any favors by signing his QO. Evolving Hockey always inflates their prices, the model is fun to check into, but is always high. The fact is that Addison had a decent rookie campaign and he is coming into his sophomore season. He didn't knock the hockey world dead with his play, so, $800k is about what he's worth to the team. The message is clear: Do you want more money? Play better.

    Here is where Addison really hurts himself, if he allows for the cavalry behind him to impress in camp while he's not there. He could easily find himself on the shelf with no real leverage whatsoever. Could someone like Hunt come in and capture his spot? Certainly! He was in the doghouse to end the year. Holding out is not the way to get out of the doghouse, there are no back doors in that house. Holding out is a sure fire way for other interested teams to circle like vultures. But, even if he asks for a trade, he's not getting much at that point. If Shooter becomes frustrated, he'll simply jettison him to an AZ team for a 2nd, and we'll see just how much fun Addison has there.

    The fact is, we can find a PP QB somewhere else. It usually is, but doesn't even need to be a defenseman. Granny ran it from the sideboards for some years. I think if you're Addison, at this point, you want to piss off the least amount of people you can. You sign your deal, keep your head down, work hard at your weaknesses, and play better. That's the only way out of the doghouse.

    And, am I seeing this from the GM perspective? I think so. Shooter made it very clear that there was a pecking order in resigning players. It's no accident that Addison's priority was dead last. If you want respect, play better. And if you make a terrible play, bust your butt to get back and break it up!

    • Like 5
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    All good and lengthy points above.

    Bottom line, BG has a plan and a back up plan to that one or we would have already seen it play out in a trade of Merrill which further depletes us for experienced D.

    I don't see us going outside the organization at this point 3 weeks before camp.

    Our PP1 has everything to do with Addison and what we saw in the end of the season was impacted by injuries and his immaturity and reaction to being coached.

    New PP coach, New PP system, New PP plan! 

    "IBGIT"

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Right now money matters to the Wild.  Addison is probably worth around that $1M AAV right now.  He could be a very good player in a couple more years under his belt.  But we need him to take less or have him traded and call Hunt or someone else up instead.  Would be a bummer to have him walk but not having the dollars to call players up when needed could be worse.

    Edited by MNCountryLife
    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    33 minutes ago, MNCountryLife said:

    Right now money matters to the Wild.  Addison is probably worth around that $1M AAV right now.  He could be a very good player in a couple more years under his belt.  But we need him to take less or have him traded and call Hunt or someone else up instead.  Would be a bummer to have him walk but not having the dollars to call players up when needed could be worse.

    Really looking forward to camp to see what Hunt looks like. Right now are so many unknowns for us.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, vonlonster67 said:

    Our PP1 has everything to do with Addison and what we saw in the end of the season was impacted by injuries and his immaturity and reaction to being coached.

    Addison might be slightly better than Spurgeon on the PP, but the PP1 has everything to do with healthy KK97, Boldy, Zuccarello and JEE. The defenseman on it is unlikely to make a major difference as long as those guys are healthy. Addison was put in an ideal situation and did well early on the offensive end, but results seemed to diminish as the season progressed.

    Nearly all of Addison's assists last year were simple passes to a skilled player that made something out of a play that Addison had little to do with. There were maybe a handful of points/passes that were different than any other D man would make.

    His defense gave back more than a handful of points, which was partly demonstrated by his team leading -17 in plus/minus. Hunt, Lambos, and Spacek may not be far off from replacing him. I'm not certain that Faber wouldn't be better as the PP QB.

    Addison should be very happy if he can get back into the same situation he had last season, and he might even make more out of his opportunity this year.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    Addison might be slightly better than Spurgeon on the PP, but the PP1 has everything to do with healthy KK97, Boldy, Zuccarello and JEE. The defenseman on it is unlikely to make a major difference as long as those guys are healthy. Addison was put in an ideal situation and did well early on the offensive end, but results seemed to diminish as the season progressed.

    Nearly all of Addison's assists last year were simple passes to a skilled player that made something out of a play that Addison had little to do with. There were maybe a handful of points/passes that were different than any other D man would make.

    His defense gave back more than a handful of points, which was partly demonstrated by his team leading -17 in plus/minus. Hunt, Lambos, and Spacek may not be far off from replacing him. I'm not certain that Faber wouldn't be better as the PP QB.

    Addison should be very happy if he can get back into the same situation he had last season, and he might even make more out of his opportunity this year.

    Huck. I thought about Faber first too and the others. I worry about putting too much on his plate, but camp will tell us more. Spacek could surprise us too.

    I never count Faber out of anything. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I was watching the Wild videos on nhl dot com slash wild and there was one about the trade deadline last season. Klingon was being discussed and Anaheim wanted more than we wanted to give. Billy’s advisors said no way, we don’t need the guy. Calls went back and forth until Anaheim relented and gave us Klingon for what we offered. We did play Klingon more than I thought he deserved but it probably didn’t matter, as was noted it was our injured forwards that hurt the PP. I think the front office and Addy both know how this is going to end; most likely BG will get his way more so than Addy.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, Sviginak said:

    I think the front office and Addy both know how this is going to end; most likely BG will get his way more so than Addy.

    I am not sure Addy does understand. If he did the contract would be signed. He is not in a position to push BG into a corner. His actions and comments last year tell me that he thinks more of himself than others think of him as a player. That is a very bad position to pout ones self into.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    38 minutes ago, Up North Guy said:

    I am not sure Addy does understand. If he did the contract would be signed. He is not in a position to push BG into a corner. His actions and comments last year tell me that he thinks more of himself than others think of him as a player. That is a very bad position to pout ones self into.

    Well, his agent certainly learned how to approach Shooter and not try and get headlines through the media. We all know how that turned out for Talbot. 

    If this is all about Addy thinking he's a better player than what he's being offered, he will quickly be passed on the depth chart if he doesn't show up. There is a "thin ice" sign directly next to his career. The thing is, he has few options, probably the most lucrative is heading to the K for awhile. But, in doing so, I'm sure they will be happy to put up with his defense 😜.

    As the lead in the article began, the Wild and Addison need each other. But, which one needs the other more? I'd suggest that Addison needs the Wild more. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Up North Guy; where did you hear that Addy was trying to push BG into a corner? A lot has been made of the one time Addy made a comment to the effect he was going to keep playing his game and now I keep hearing about his bad attitude in the comment section of many articles. Did I miss something? Addy will sign or be traded; I don’t think there are ulterior motives on one side or the other. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Sviginak said:

    Up North Guy; where did you hear that Addy was trying to push BG into a corner? A lot has been made of the one time Addy made a comment to the effect he was going to keep playing his game and now I keep hearing about his bad attitude in the comment section of many articles. Did I miss something? Addy will sign or be traded; I don’t think there are ulterior motives on one side or the other. 

    It is mostly speculation by what we have seen in observations and Russo's takes being close to the team. Spurgeon was asked during the turbulence on Addy's play and being benched when Addy was having problems if he ever had looked to him for advice. Spurgeon acknowledged he hadn't and he pretty much keeps to himself. 

    DE and BG were both asked about how Addy responded to advice and then again when he was benched. Each time neither elaborated so it was a case of listening to what they weren't saying. With other players, say Dumba, and the question was asked they commented about the reception or measures he took. With Addy, no comment of anything on how he responded, what he was doing or how he was working with the vets.

    Same thing with Addy during interviews, it was never about what he was doing to get better, but almost a stonewall of the questions. He never took ownership of his mistakes and acknowledged a problem, just general speak and ignoring question.

    It all makes sense.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    18 hours ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    The defenseman on it is unlikely to make a major difference as long as those guys are healthy.

    I think it does make a difference. Look back at the Ryan Suter years. He'd often get the puck, hold on to it, skate to the dasher boards, either dump it in deep or let go a weak wrister that got blocked. 

    To have a player at the point that makes quick, decisive plays to get the puck to all those players you mentioned in positions where they can make a play with it does make a difference.

    No idea what the stats bear out, but it also makes difference when the defenseman at the point can get his shot through to the net for a hulking JEEK to tap home a rebound. 

    I see Addison being able to these 2 very important things very well while on the PP. And I believe this team can ill-afford to have a middling PP with the kind of talent that's on the top unit. He's the only one at the blue line that has showed any sort of real urgency to make plays that end in scoring chances before a minute has ticked off the penalty clock. He is a huge asset in that way.

    I also feel like Jon Merrill did the kid absolutely no favors on defense. Which only exacerbated Addison's weaknesses. 

    Idk, I don't think what he's asking for is that outlandish. Does he have learning and development to do? Absolutely. And he can only do that with ice time, practice, and some patience. Last season was his first time with any real significant time in the NHL. To expect him to be a fully-ripened prospect in 32 games is not a reasonable expectation. And he's only 23. He's still young. I don't understand pulling the plug on a kid that shows he can offer help in a very important, impactful place on the ice.

     

    Not to mention, this projection and conjecture about his attitude is all just that. No one really knows how he is taking any of this or acting in the locker room. And if he comes off a little cocksure, I mean, that's just pro athletes. 

     

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 hours ago, vonlonster67 said:

    It is mostly speculation by what we have seen in observations and Russo's takes being close to the team. Spurgeon was asked during the turbulence on Addy's play and being benched when Addy was having problems if he ever had looked to him for advice. Spurgeon acknowledged he hadn't and he pretty much keeps to himself. 

    DE and BG were both asked about how Addy responded to advice and then again when he was benched. Each time neither elaborated so it was a case of listening to what they weren't saying. With other players, say Dumba, and the question was asked they commented about the reception or measures he took. With Addy, no comment of anything on how he responded, what he was doing or how he was working with the vets.

    Same thing with Addy during interviews, it was never about what he was doing to get better, but almost a stonewall of the questions. He never took ownership of his mistakes and acknowledged a problem, just general speak and ignoring question.

    It all makes sense.  

    You're projecting here. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, joebou15 said:

    You're projecting here. 

    Its been projected by every local media talking head for months. I'm just recounting what I heard and clearly saw with my own eyes. 

    It doesn't mean things haven't been repaired or that it can't be fixed.  He's still a young kid.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 9/1/2023 at 4:33 PM, mnfaninnc said:

    I am truly of the opinion that Addison is not doing the Wild any favors by signing his QO. Evolving Hockey always inflates their prices, the model is fun to check into, but is always high.

    You keep insisting this, but they always post their numbers in comparison to the contracts they actually get. Turns out, they do all right. Look forward to your data showing the opposite. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 hours ago, joebou15 said:

    I also feel like Jon Merrill did the kid absolutely no favors on defense. Which only exacerbated Addison's weaknesses. 

    Jon Merrill was only -2 on the year.  Given that Addison was -17, I suspect that Merrill was on the positive side of the ledger when Addison wasn't his partner. The Wild didn't do Merrill any favors by pairing him with Addison!

    Merrill is a mediocre 3rd pairing defenseman. Addison is far below average as a defenseman. His only skill that's helpful is his PP ability and that's somewhat overhyped because of the other changes made to how the PP units were setup compared to prior years, and the skill of those surrounding Addison--notice that his scoring doesn't hold up even strength.

    I'm not suggesting that Addison isn't above average running the PP, but I'm also saying he isn't elite. He might be slightly above average with a few other Wild players who are average behind him.

    It made sense to use Addison to run the PP primarily because it keeps the top 4 D-men fresh for even strength and PK minutes, but Addison was probably the worst defenseman they put on the ice even strength--the save percentage with him on ice was far lower than with any other regular skater.

    Addison has not held up doing the important things his position generally requires, like skating hard to get back on defense when the puck is behind you. I'm skeptical that he'll become adequate on D, but that doesn't mean he doesn't deserve more opportunities.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    Nearly all of Addison's assists last year were simple passes to a skilled player that made something out of a play that Addison had little to do with. There were maybe a handful of points/passes that were different than any other D man would make.

    You mentioned this in a previous post? Simple passes and little to do with? Doubtful,  that's called vision, something that couldn't get done by Klingberg or Spurgeon as our PP1 tanked.

    I think you diminished his skills to see, react, place the puck and not pass the puck around the point. His action from the blue line created opportunity like no other we had to offer, so hardly simple passes that were no different than other D men would make that we don't have.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 hours ago, Tony Abbott said:

    You keep insisting this, but they always post their numbers in comparison to the contracts they actually get. Turns out, they do all right. Look forward to your data showing the opposite. 

    Scanning through Evolving Hockey's X feed (I am not an X member and since they changed their policy on looking up X people, it's all over the place and I don't get to check in on Russo either) there were 3 contracts and estimates that I found. They were spot on with Teddy Blueger, and significantly off on Bryan Rust and Jeff Petry. 

    In both of the off scenarios, Evolving Hockey had inflated values for both players. They had a lot of fancy charts and data on players, but their predictions always seem to be over what was actually signed for, specifically the top echelon players. 

    To me, I find their models to be unreliable, but, checking in with them can be useful just like checking your house on realtor.com or zillow.com. There's a ballpark number there that gives you a general look on what the player is worth. I think in a flat cap era, their data never took into account how tight teams were against the cap, and only took into account a player's statistics (both normal and fancy) to get a value where only a team like AZ could sign the player for that. 

    I also find that their models are skewed towards certain statistics while discounting some of the "warts" statistics. So, for a test Tony, starting with the Boldy resigning, what were the numbers Evolving Hockey had on our guys and what did they actually sign for? Unfortunately, to find this out, it looked like I needed a subscription to the site. 

    With the Wild being in cap purgatory, perhaps our guys aren't the best to look at? Perhaps another team would be better? We wouldn't have an emotional tie with any of those players either, which might make it a little more subjective. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    After reading the Evolving Hockey internal review of itself, I came away with a more complete view of them. I still don't think their model is accurate. Their take was that they do much better with RFAs than UFAs, at least this year. They thought that a lot of UFAs signed weird, short term deals, with players, potentially, waiting for the cap increases. 

    I also thought it was interesting to look at their "value" index, where MN finished 3rd. AZ and Chicago finished last. I think you could look at that index and maybe see which places are considered destinations and which are considered overpayment needed to go there. 

    My last take on this was with the goalies. It appears Evolving Hockey had a pretty brutal year predicting goalie salaries. And, in their models when doing the evaluations, they eliminated the goalies from the graphs. Long story short, their model for goalies is probably way off (and from their view, goalies are very underpaid). 

    If you're geeky and like the numbers crunch and dive into equations, the article Tony linked me to is probably a good read. They were very good at the <$2m, yet they kicked out all the league minimum deals. At the >$5m, they were not too reliable, however, also at that price, they were not expecting such short term deals.

    My conclusion is essentially the same, they are like looking up your house to get a ballpark value on realtor.com or zillow.com. Some players are presented very nicely, others need a lot of work. Addy, to me, is in the latter category. But, if we're carrying 22 players, he does give us a touch of flexibility by being able to fill in at wing decently. I still believe he should be happy with his QO, and if I'm Shooter, I'm wasting no sleep over him not signing, and slipping his deal in one of my file boxes on the desk. Really, there's no negotiation here. It's more of a take it and prove me wrong for next time, or leave it and I'll jettison you to AZ. 

    Oh, and there was one other thing I found strange. It was Matt Dumba's contract in AZ. EH had him listed at $2.6m and he signed for $3.9m. I thought we saw reports of EH listing him at a multi-year $6m hit earlier in the last season. If you're going to change your projections mid stream, yes, you'll probably do better.

    Edited by mnfaninnc
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...