Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • When Will It Start To Click For David Jiricek?


    Image courtesy of Brad Penner-Imagn Images
    Tom Schreier

    David Jiricek probably would have liked to have drawn in for the Minnesota Wild’s home opener against the Columbus Blue Jackets on October 11. Instead, the Wild stuck him in the press box four booths down from Don Waddell, the general manager who traded him after 53 games. 

    While they removed Jiricek from the ice, they paired him with Alex Goligoski in the rafters. Goligoski is the retired 17-year NHL veteran from Grand Rapids, who spent his final three seasons with the Wild. 

    Officially, he’s a player development advisor with the Wild. Unofficially, he was Jiricek’s hype man that night. Goligoski sat next to Jiricek and coached him up for two periods during Minnesota’s 7-4 madcap loss.

    The Athletic detailed their exchange, and it’s worth reading in full if you haven’t already. However, I’d like to highlight a point Goligoski made. 

    He’s actually at a very similar place to where I was one time in my career when I started, but I had the benefit of not being rushed to the NHL. 

    [When] I was drafted, I was 21 when I went to my first NHL camp. And I didn’t make that team, but I had no expectation to make that team. He was kind of thrown right into the fire as a high pick going to Columbus. 

    The team wasn’t very good. They were young, and they were just playing their young guys, and I mean, in my opinion, that’s not the place to do it.

    Generally speaking, I’ve maintained that the Wild should err on the side of playing young players, especially when the worst of the Zach Parise-Ryan Suter buyout penalties. They weren’t going to win in the playoffs with $15 million in dead cap space. Why not focus on player development?

    It goes without saying that the Wild shouldn’t overexpose their young players. Still, I always felt their reluctance to play Matt Boldy in 2021 and Marco Rossi a year later, and some of their other young players, had more to do with the frustrations of coaching inexperienced talent. 

    It’s probably a testament to Midwest sentimentality that we assign cardinal virtues to Bill Guerin and the people he's hired to work for him. He’s exercising prudence by being patient with young players! It’s only just that he prioritize the veterans!

    However, Almighty Bill is probably succumbing to the seven deadly sins. He has too much pride to lord over a losing team. The Wild pay him dearly to preside over their team, and he wants to ensure job security after buying out Parise and Suter. Remember the “five-year plan” he devised five years into his tenure?

    Cam Talbot – or at least his agent – has experienced his wrath. So have reporters who dare question why his team can’t get out of the first round of the playoffs, or why he didn’t bolster the roster at last year’s deadline when Minnesota’s division rivals did. In 2023, the league investigated whether he verbally harassed a Wild employee. (Wild management determined that Guerin had not committed a fireable offense.)

    Patience? Temperance? I don't buy it.

    Back to Goligoski, who sits in on coach's meetings with John Hynes and his staff, and who's vision for young players aligns with the organization's.

    Goligoski spent his age-21 season in the AHL and played only three games with the Pittsburgh Penguins the following year. However, Pittsburgh took Goligoski in the second round, 61st overall, in 2004. They likely had different expectations for Goligoski than Minnesota has for Jiricek, who Columbus took sixth overall in 2022.

    The Wild traded a haul to Columbus for Jiricek:

    • A 2025 first-round pick (top-5 protected)
    • Their third- and fourth-round picks in 2026, and a second-rounder in 2027
    • Prospect Daemon Hunt

    Columbus sent back their 2025 fifth-round pick, and the Wild have since claimed Hunt off waivers. Still, they mortgaged much of their future for the 21-year-old defenseman. The package they sent to the Blue Jackets indicates they’re invested in Jiricek. However, given how he’s played in Minnesota, the question is as much whether they eventually try to recoup value on the trade becomes as much as it is whether he becomes a top-pair defenseman.

    “As a defenseman, you’re going to hit your prime at whatever, 27, 28,” Goligoski told The Athletic. “So at 21, David’s not even close.”

    Goligoski is moving the goal posts in his comments above. Jiricek is nearly 22, and athletes are typically in their physical prime between the ages of 26 and 32. Goligoski isn't that far off. Still, had eight goals and 29 assists at age 23, broke out with 14 goals and 32 assists at 24, and had 12 goals and 23 assists at age 32.

    As with many athletes, Goligoski’s production began to decline at age 33. However, he lasted in the league until age 38 because of his hockey IQ, which he is passing on to Jiricek and Minnesota’s defensemen as a development coach.

    For context, Jared Spurgeon broke into the league at 21 and played his best hockey between ages 25 and 33. Meanwhile, many of the league’s best defensemen have been productive at a young age. 

    Zach Bogosian had nine goals in 47 games as an 18-year-old in 2008-09 and 10 goals in his age-19 season. However, his production steadily tailed off before he reached his physical prime. Zeev Buium played in the playoffs after leaving Denver University as a 19-year-old last year. He has six points in eight games. 

    Brock Faber broke into the league at age 20 and had 18 goals and 58 assists in his age-21 and 22 seasons. He hasn’t been productive this year, but that’s likely because the Wild played him too many minutes last season.

    Player development is non-linear, and each prospect has their own trajectory. Still, it’s fair to judge Jiricek by his age-22 projection, given his draft pedigree and what the Wild gave up to get him. 

    He’s a Schröedinger cat. He may end up like Faber, the product of an aggressive trade that worked out for the Wild. Jiricek may also become a bust like Calen Addison, who Guerin traded Jason Zucker for despite working for the Pittsburgh Penguins when they drafted and developed Addison.

    The Wild also got a first-round pick in the trade, which they used on Carson Lambos. Zucker scored 50 goals in 172 games for Pittsburgh. His 89 goals in 321 games since leaving Minnesota nearly match his totals for the Wild (132 goals in 456 games). Minnesota drafted Lambos, a defenseman, 26th overall in 2021, and he hasn't made his NHL debut.

    We won’t know for sure whether the Jiricek trade worked out until he turns 24 or 25. Still, it’s fair to express concern about a player who they’re healthy-scratching a year after they traded a haul for last year. He may become an impact defenseman, but they may also try to flip him to recoup any value they can in a few years.

    More pertinently, it’s only natural to question Minnesota’s ability to identify and develop young talent, which will be vital to its success this season and in the future.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    Guerin dumped Chisholm and Merrill and went to say, "Our D is set.". They gave a PTO to Johnson.  Bogo plays yes, but who has gotten in the games as soon as he got injured?  Not Hunt.  They are going to play Jiricek come hell or high water.  He definitely tries hard, which is way more than Addison ever did.

    I am not worried about him.  He's getting his reps, and isn't a complete dumpster fire as was feared.  Joke's on Columbus I suppose.

    Spurgeon's got 1-2 years left, and may retire. Barring some crazy move, it is Jiricek's spot to lose.

    Edited by Citizen Strife
    • Like 7
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I agree.  Must play Jiricek full time no matter the results.  It's looking very questionable as to the team making the playoffs this season.  Play him.  Let him learn from mistakes.  The team and especially Jiricek benefit nothing by having him be healthy scratches.  Besides many of our veterans continue to play uninspired hockey.  They make mistakes and appear not to be trying.  Everyone just says too bad.  When a rookie or young player makes the same mistakes hes banished to the press box healthy scratches.  Seems an odd way to build a contending hockey team.

     

    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I disagree with Greg a bit on the healthy scratches. My hope is that while sitting with Goligoski, he pointed out things on Spurgeon's shifts all night long. Taking him out to watch from above every now and then isn't a bad thing. However, giving him a string of 5 sits in the Prossbox is not productive. 

    Even though Jiricek was drafted 6 overall, he is a large body and those guys take longer to develop especially with their skating. I am convinced that he has always pinched a lot at the blue line and been good enough not to have that get him. He can't now and must unlearn that tendency and this will take time. 

    At first, he just has to notice he should have been moving backward. After that he may come back to the bench after his shift talking to himself to retreat. When that starts happening the coaching has gotten through. Then he will start to do it, not always, but inconsistently until he is able to pick his spots. He needs ice time to get this done, not watching from upstairs, unless he gets pulled once in awhile for another Goligoski teaching session. 

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think the only time Jiricek has been on the ice for a goal against was the one where the Flyers banked it in off the back of Wallstedt's skate from behind the goal. Bogosian had a surgical procedure and is on IR, so I think the Wild will get a whole bunch of minutes from Jiricek the remainder of this season.

    "Bogosian suffered the lower-body injury on October 17 after blocking a shot during a game against the Washington Capitals. He was flown back to Minnesota from the team's road trip to undergo the procedure."

    Hopefully Jiricek takes the coaching and is in the right places on defense, where he can chip in a little on offense when the puck finds him in his correct defensive assignment rather than him chasing the offensive opportunities.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Everyone select now which player from the 2025 draft you wanted at pick#20 or later, who you believe will be better than Jiricek. Keep that in mind for 4-5 years down the road when that prospect might see NHL ice for the first time.

    • Like 5
    • Haha 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    20 minutes ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    Everyone select now which player from the 2025 draft you wanted at pick#20 or later, who you believe will be better than Jiricek. Keep that in mind for 4-5 years down the road when that prospect might see NHL ice for the first time.

    I agree with the upside of the Jiricek trade, except for giving CBJ Hunt and FOUR draft picks.  But I'll accept your challenge, in 2025, William Horcoff (Shawn Horcoff's son) or Mason West (ugh Edina cake-eaters) both 6'5"-6'6" centers, but yes 3-4 years away which is why Jiricek trade was preferred.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 hours ago, 0 Stanley Cups said:

    But I'll accept your challenge, in 2025, William Horcoff (Shawn Horcoff's son) or Mason West (ugh Edina cake-eaters) both 6'5"-6'6" centers, but yes 3-4 years away which is why Jiricek trade was preferred.

    Horcoff appears to have some talent.  Looks like he's skating on Michigan's top line with Michael Hage, who was a 1st round C talent from the prior draft.  If Buium wasn't available, Hage is the player I would have wanted the Wild to draft. Both great prospects, but Buium's upside value is very exciting.

    No idea what to think about Mason West. He had 10 USHL games last year(1 goal, 8 assists) and no games played in 25-26 so far. Solid high school player, but he seems to be focused on playing QB in football at Edina at the moment. He's an intriguing talent, but late 1st in what was considered a lesser draft. We agree that Edina is not where I would prefer my prospects to come from.

    I believe Jiricek could become a very solid 2nd line D man with offensive ability. Horcoff could easily be better than Charlie Stramel, but it will take a few years to find out. I understand there were other picks involved, but if Jiricek develops as the top 10 pick that he was, his impact could be significant. He has experience as the top line RD for Czechia in tournaments where they performed very well, so I think he still has a strong chance to develop.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'd like hockey to once and a while copy baseball. The best players on the team will occasionally get a game off to rest their body for a long season. Yes, MLB is 162 games and twice as long as NHL season, but it's not nearly as physically intense. You could have Jiricek play 6 games in a row by giving every blue liner a game off for rest. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, Fezig said:

    I'd like hockey to once and a while copy baseball.

    Why is it that when I look at the Twins draft picks they are almost always taller and thicker than the Wild's? 

    You'd think the opposite would be true even if the Twins are sometimes drafting 22 year olds.

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 10/24/2025 at 4:52 PM, TCMooch said:

    Jiricek will more than likely never develop into what we want him to be and we got fleeced in that trade. 

    We didn’t get fleeced. We actually got hunt back. They selected a pretty good goalie in the first. The other picks we gave them most likely won’t amount to much. We will see but it’s not as much as you would think.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    17 minutes ago, Mateo3xm said:

    We didn’t get fleeced. We actually got hunt back. They selected a pretty good goalie in the first. The other picks we gave them most likely won’t amount to much. We will see but it’s not as much as you would think.

    Why does it matter they took a goalie?  We would have used that 1st rd pick on a skater.  

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 hours ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    Why does it matter they took a goalie?  We would have used that 1st rd pick on a skater.  

    Because this last draft was not a very deep draft and goalies are notoriously hard to judge. If one of those prospects turns out to be stellar around our pick range then sure you could have a point but it’s still very early to judge the trade and say we got fleeced.

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Jiricek had another rough game.  Buium showed up and had good defensive plays despite the score.  So I am starting to wonder if Jiricek is gonna last long if Bogo comes back.

    Edited by Citizen Strife
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...