Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • What Could David Jiricek Bring To Minnesota?


    Image courtesy of Matt Krohn - Imagn Images
    Tony Abbott

    It's never too early in the season for trade rumors, and the Minnesota Wild rarely get through the early part of the season without activity. Since Bill Guerin took over as general manager, he's been proactive at fixing holes on his roster, trading for Ian Cole, Ryan Reaves, and Zach Bogosian in the first two months of the season.

    So where there are trade rumors, there's the Minnesota Wild, and it looks like the Wild are circling around defenseman David Jiricek, whom the Columbus Blue Jackets are looking to trade. This isn't the first time the Wild have been connected to the former No. 6 overall pick, but the smoke surrounding the hot stove is finally heating up. National reporters like Frank Seravelli and local beat writers like Michael Russo are backing up the idea that the Wild are in.

    Again, this isn't the first time there's been buzz about this possibility. But that was then, and this is now. The Blue Jackets have changed their general manager and coach since then, and while, say, someone like Kent Johnson has thrived with a second chance, Jiricek has fallen out of favor with a second regime. He turns 21 on Thanksgiving, and for now, he's as much of a Cleveland Monster as he is a Columbus Blue Jacket. It's a bit young for this label, but the former top pick is officially a post-hype player.

    So, what would Minnesota get in today's version of Jircek, and is the juice worth the squeeze?

    Unsurprisingly for a player whose team is rushing two years removed from their draft, Jiricek doesn't have much track record in the NHL to speak on. In his 53 career NHL games, the former top pick has cost Columbus 1.6 Standings Points Above Replacement, struggling offensively and defensively at 5-on-5. 

    image.png

    That's not to dunk on Jiricek -- it's hardly a crime to not be NHL-ready in your age-19 season, as he was last year. However, the source of friction is Jiricek's public displeasure with being in the AHL. If Minnesota trades for him, they need to be ready to keep him in the NHL because chances are he won't enjoy Des Moines much more than Cleveland.

    To be fair, if Jiricek believes himself to be too good for the AHL, he has a point. Through 86 games for Cleveland, he has 14 goals and 59 points as a defenseman. Those are exceptional numbers for a player his age. He also thrived during the Calder Cup Playoffs, scoring three goals and 11 points in 14 games. Purely from a points perspective, Jiricek's trajectory is promising.

    image.png

    But as Dean Evason told The Athletic, "We know his offensive side." So what's the problem?

    So far, it's been his footspeed. The Athletic's Scott Wheeler wrote about him last season, saying, "He moves his feet well for his size, though I do worry about his stilted backward skating and how often he gets caught flat-footed against the rush... He's a better skater going forward than backward."

    Ask, say, Jonas Brodin, and you'll find out how important skating backward is. Though, if you're the Wild, that's probably the source of optimism that Jiricek can be fixed. Wild skating coach Andy Ness has a guru reputation and successes to show for it in players like Marco Rossi. If Ness can work his magic on Jiricek, then Minnesota would have a big, right-shot defenseman with high-end offensive skills on their hand, and that's something that any team could use.

    So, the question becomes: What are (or should) the Wild be willing to give up for him?

    There may have been a time when acquiring Jiricek might have cost another former top pick in Rossi. That's almost certainly not the case today. Whatever the Wild feel about Rossi, he's a center who has 17 points in 21 games. No team is trading that for an AHL defenseman who is clearly out of favor with their club. It might not even cost a (current) top prospect. TSN's Chris Johnston reported that the Jackets will "start to listen" about draft pick compensation.

    However, the Wild can give Columbus immediate -- or near-immediate help, which is a value-add over a team like the Pittsburgh Penguins. Who makes sense?

    It feels difficult to think Minnesota would part with their top prospects at forward, defense, and goaltender, so Danila Yurov, Zeev Buium, and Jesper Wallstedt would be out. Going to that next tier of prospect would lead us to Riley Heidt and Liam Öhgren.

    Heidt is interesting as a potential center prospect, but with Adam Fantilli and Cayden Lindstrom in Columbus' Under-21 pool, Heidt's destination would likely be the wing. If that's the case, then the 5-foot-10 forward would have competition in top short king winger prospects in 5-foot-8 Gavin Brindley and 5-foot-9 Jordan Dumais.

    image.png

    Öhgren probably makes the most sense in a one-for-one swap for a few reasons. For one, teams like to save face in these types of prospect-for-prospect trades. Look at the Winnipeg Jets with Rutger McGroarty, who they traded for the Pittsburgh Penguins' Brayden Yager -- both players being forwards drafted No. 14 overall. Öhgren wasn't a top-10 draft pick, but he has a first-round pedigree from the same draft. It's not equal value, but it's something.

    The other reason Öhgren might be appealing is that there isn't a one-to-one comparable to him in Columbus' system. The Jackets' wing prospects are either small or have major flaws with their skating. Öhgren doesn't have either problem, and his presence as a player who combines physicality and skill should appeal to someone like Dean Evason.

    But maybe Columbus would want a defenseman to refill their pool. While there aren't any Jiricek's in Minnesota's system (assuming Buium is off the table), there are plenty of intriguing names. David Spacek is a right-shot defenseman riding a five-game point streak and has two goals and nine points in his second pro season. Daemon Hunt is widely considered to be NHL-ready. The drop-off in pedigree would likely mean a draft pick would have to come into play, but a lottery-protected first-rounder in 2025 seems like a reasonable thing to sweeten the deal.

    Jiricek has his red flags, but his skill set makes for a smart buy-low on a caliber of prospect that is difficult to come by. His physical stature also would lend a strong balance for an up-and-coming blueline that lacks sheer beefiness. If the Wild can wrest him away for the right price, 

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 5

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    1 hour ago, Protec said:

    Mnfan and I never agreed on Laine. That's alright, I think there's value in guys who can shoot the puck and offensive defenseman. 

    I'm apprehensive about players with injury and attitude issues. It took Dubois how many organizations to be okay? Druuin and Laine had to quit hockey for a period to return to the NHL. Eichel had to burn 5-6 years in Buffalo before being kicked out of town. There's talented players like Duchene or Gauthier who have tried to force a GM's hand. Sometimes successfully but is it fair to lump Jiricek in? 

    I don't know, but I know the internal players and what the Wild need. A replacement for Spurgeon with a right shot is a need coming up. If Yurov, Heidt, Knudi, RasmuKampu, and Stramel are all centers along with Rossi, it's fair to suggest trading for a young defenseman who fits the mold management envisioned. I'm not personally sold on Jiricek. Will he be satisfied paying dues in IA for two years til he's closer to Chisholm's age? 

    We had Soucy outta the late rounds and lost him. We picked up Chisholm from the scrap-pile as a bonus-find. So despite an expansion draft the Wild have backfilled nicely after losing most of their defense core from pre-buyout times. 

    I'm satisfied currently to a point where I don't wanna see the Wild give up much for a Jiricek. I know GMBG could afford it, I just wanna be certain it's the right guy. Jiricek is 20 so that's a catch 222. He's got potential but will he be ready now or stay content to develop? It's not one I'd love to see. It is an important piece, a top 4 RD. 

    I often get weirded out by what random guys Guerin likes or doesn't. He's been right plenty so that's good but there's glaring inconsistencies when NoJo or Rossi come up. If they like Jiricek, great I guess. I'll believe it when I see it. My gut says it's not the missing link to make MN a Cup contender in this season or next. That may not be the goal but I'm not convinced injuries or attitude issues evaporate altogether? There's examples of top 10 picks fizzling-out every draft almost. I'd like to see steady, quiet results. -10 and 50 games for a 20yo on a bad team isn't unforgivable or worthless but if he's not a pain in the ass, why does CBJ wanna make a 6th overall guy available? The agent trying to force a trade? It's just not ideal in my opinion. 

    I'll add to this. How well have our prospects developed in Iowa? Even if Jiricek is willing to spend a couple years in the A, what are the chances we're able to continue his development into a top D man. 

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, Enforceror said:

    I'll add to this. How well have our prospects developed in Iowa? Even if Jiricek is willing to spend a couple years in the A, what are the chances we're able to continue his development into a top D man. 

    Fair questions here. If Brackett and Guerin have had luck with older acquisitions like Chisholm and the ratio of drafted defenders to make the NHL is lower maybe they're looking at the Faber model or a similar case with Jiricek. He's got size and at 6'4" can shoot hard. That's a long reach. 

    I've been doing my research. Here's a fresh article to add into the discussion. I think the Wild have been doing well enough, I would prefer a conservative approach. At the same time if MN traded a 1st and a prospect. They can afford it now and have a high likelihood they'll draft in the 20's or after this season. 

    https://www.yardbarker.com/nhl/articles/we_now_know_what_kent_hughes_must_offer_the_blue_jackets_to_acquire_david_jiricek/s1_17452_41315061

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 hours ago, Protec said:

    My gut says it's not the missing link to make MN a Cup contender in this season or next. That may not be the goal but I'm not convinced injuries or attitude issues evaporate altogether?

    Why is he available? Because he asked for a trade. He wants out. What is the attitude all about? Apparently he was told he was staying in Columbus, and then was demoted to Cleveland. I think he believes he was wronged, and it has soured him on CBJ. 

    I think wherever Jiricek is traded, he's going to be starting on their A team. That new team will want to assess and see where his game truly is. I think if you're straight forward with him, he'll comply, I don't think it's about being too good for the A, I think it's more about actions not meeting promises. They may have had a similar problem with Kent Johnson too. 

    CBJ is definitely under new management, but it appears that Waddell has had to really work hard to undo some things that have happened there. So, why can't we take advantage of an organization struggling with its players?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 hours ago, Protec said:

    At the same time if MN traded a 1st and a prospect. They can afford it now and have a high likelihood they'll draft in the 20's or after this season. 

    I don't know what Shooter is offering, but I'm thinking it is more the prospects than the picks. Thinning out some of the prospects is likely a good idea. A hot prospect like Heidt might bring home a defender like Jiricek. Jiricek fits into the age group that Guerin is trying to build. He's in the same draft year of Yurov, Ohgren and surprisingly Spacek.(who we took as an overager)

    We've invested pretty heavily in the 2020-2022 age group, and Jiricek is another prospect from this group. If I were Shooter, this is exactly the type of prospect I'd want to acquire. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Wild can't trade Rossi until the season is over.  Right now he is one of the players who is scoring.  Doubt anyone else on the team is going to wake up and score more than him.  So, we are kind of stuck.  

    But two prospects for Jiricek would be do able in my book.  One forward and one defenseman.  Ohgren or Haight and Hunt or Lambos.  Would we miss any of those four?  Hunt because we need him to fill in when Brodin/Spurgeon get hurt for 20 games a year.  But that would be exactly what Jiricek would fill.  Ohgren might be great might not, we don't know.  Same thing with Haight, could be good but might not.  

    Wallstedt is out for two reasons.  One he isn't playing well.  Two Columbus has a decent goalie and backup.  

    Yurov and Heidt are considered the brightest bulbs in the prospect pool.  Kumpulainen seems to be a brightening bulb in the prospect pool.  With those three in the mix it is easy to say that The Wild could trade Rossi and not miss a beat on the trade.  But no matter how bright the future is for these three they are not going to outshine Rossi this year.  

    Do we think we are going to win the Stanley Cup with this roster.  I don't know.  Gus is playing well enough to ride him to a Cup win.  Kirill is scoring enough 5 on 5 to maybe win a Cup.  But if this team doesn't have Rossi on it there is no chance they win a Cup.  However, trading Rossi for Jiricek before the end of the season might put the franchise in a better position going forward. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...