Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness
  • The Wild Should Target Mounds View's Oliver Moore


    Image courtesy of © Geoff Burke-USA TODAY Sports
    Justin Hein

    The State of Hockey’s pride runs deep. Fans across Minnesota grew up dreaming of playing for the Gophers, the North Stars, and eventually the Wild. Since the NHL returned to Minnesota 23 years ago, babies have been born with dreams of donning forest green. For the past few years, fans have seen some of those dreams come true. 

    It’s undeniable that the State of Hockey loves One Of Us’ Football fans in the state have clamored for Larry Fitzgerald to join the Vikings, even into the twilight of his career. Many Twins fans loved Joe Mauer. Zach Parise’s tenure with Minnesota was the culmination of this trend, and fans embraced him as one of their own even though he may have been a North Stars nepo baby. His injuries hurt deeper, his big goals felt bigger, and those special moments he had seemed more meaningful than any other player. 

    Bill Guerin may have the chance to bring that feeling back to Minnesota in the form of Oliver Moore. Born in Mounds View, Moore grew up playing for Mounds View/Irondale. He played at Totino Grace, where he scored a goal per game as a sophomore. If that weren’t home-grown enough, he’s already committed to the University of Minnesota for his freshman year of college. Moore is available in this year’s NHL Draft, and he’s one of the most exciting prospects on the board outside the top five prospects. His raw tools give him a chance to become the best Minnesota-born player in NHL history. 

    It sounds extreme, but scouts agree that he skates like Apollo Ohno. Draft pundits have lauded him with more superlatives than Tom Brady. Elite Prospects lists him as the best straight-line skater in his class, with the fourth-best motor, the second-best transition forward, the second-best two-way forward, and the second-best “four-way mobility” (a combination of footwork and agility). McKeen’s Hockey ranked him as the fastest and best overall skater in the draft. They also had him as their second-best two-way forward. 

    As much as his skating jumps off the page, his defensive responsibility may be just as impressive. He weaponizes his speed in the defensive zone, racing to loose pucks. His defensive ability isn’t as much a matter of technique as a combination of speed and pride. Already 5’11” and around 180 pounds, Moore’s defensive game should translate in the NHL as he fills out over the next few years. The combination of defensive puck-winning and speed in transition set his floor as a checking center with better speed than Joel Eriksson Ek. Elite Prospects compared him to Dylan Larkin, and Moore confirmed it. “I like to model my game after Dylan Larkin,” Moore told the EP draft guide. “[He] pushes the pace, uses his speed all over the ice…. [I]like to model my game after him.”

    So, how could Minnesota acquire this player? They have the 21st pick. Surely, there’s no way that there are 20 players better than Moore? 

    For starters, Moore may be totally out of reach for Minnesota. Experts have mocked him all over the mid-to-high first round, settling with a projection near 12th overall. Recently he’s been mocked everywhere between 5th and 20th overall. 

    Oliver Moore Draft Stock iyer_prasanth 20230612.png

    Depending upon how the board falls and each team’s internal rankings, Moore could easily be within striking distance for Minnesota, but they’ll almost certainly need to trade up to acquire him. Based on previous comparable trades, Minnesota’s current draft capital allows them to strike a deal to jump from 21st up to 13th overall, but that would cost them their two second-round picks. The Wild organization would have to really love Moore to make that move, but who’s to say they don’t? He’s an excellent fit for an organization starving for a first-line center. 

    There is much to love about Moore’s game, but there are questions about his vision. Sometimes the ice is wide-open to him. Moore flashes playmaking vision and soft hands, setting up teammates in his best moments. In his worst moments, scouts note that he drops his head through the neutral zone and loses sight of his teammates. Some speculate that this is part of his role further down the depth chart in the US National Team Development Program (USNTDP) and that he’d look better with teammates who could keep his pace. 

    I’m skeptical of this explanation, but he may develop better vision under Bob Motzko. This debate is central to explaining Moore’s production questions from the past two years. While scouts love his tape, his analytics are an uncertainty, given the depth of this draft. 

    Moore’s NHL equivalency (NHLe) based on similar USNTDP prospects translates to him being at the level of a 31-point scorer this year based on Byron Bader’s statistical model. While this is a solid number for a forward in an average draft, Bader’s model counts nearly 50 players with a similar or higher equivalency from this seson. If Moore can unlock better vision at the end of his blistering rushes, this problem can go away. 

    Oliver Moore vs Zach Parise HP Card.png

    This doesn’t directly include a player’s 200-foot game because it’s intended to translate the goals and assists of a given prospect to an equivalent amount over 82 NHL games. That explains some, but not all, of the reasons Moore is projected to be drafted higher than his analytical profile might suggest. 

    Many scouting reports describe Moore as “toolsy.” That backhanded compliment is among the most loaded phrases in the scouting community. It connotes an amazing ceiling, awe-inspiring athleticism, and the underlying threat of gut-wrenching failure.

    On the other hand, Moore could become a top-line center out of this draft. It’s the most coveted asset in the NHL. The cornerstone of Cup contenders and something that perhaps only 10 or 15 NHL clubs really possess at any given time. Every team picking at the top of the draft either needs one now or will trade theirs for draft capital to spark a rebuild. Sure, he has offensive warts, but that’s how you sneak a top-line center out of the draft. 

    The other problem with the toolsy label is that his defensive ability provides a floor for Moore’s game. Even if the vision never develops, Moore has a defining trait in his speed that will give him a clear identity. That helps coaches put players in a position to succeed, and it helps players execute what their coaches want them to do. If Minnesota pulls the trigger to trade up and acquire Moore, the absolute floor on that move figures to be what they’d typically get out of the 21st overall pick, anyways. If the opportunity arises, the Wild shouldn't hesitate to strike.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 3

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    Justin, we just couldn't get in, lots to talk about. I think you hit the ball out of the park with the suggestion. According to the combine, Moore is up to 195, and he did pretty well in the strength and jumping portions of the combine. 

    This is a guy we need to absolutely go up and get, or convince him his best plan is to stay at the U for graduation and not sign with his drafting team and simply sign here. I'd rather have him in our system though.

    I suspect that the head down through the neutral zone will be corrected fairly quickly when he absorbs a couple of big hits. For me, it would take 3 before I learned not to do that. 

    I do think if he has linemates that can keep up, and Kaprizov can, he'll use them and look for them. Putting his head down seems like the kind of thing you do when you don't see anyone around you and you know you'll need to do it yourself. Playing with Cooley and Snuggerud should alleviate that tendency.

    So, now we've just got to go get him.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I've thought about what it would take for us to trade up, but I just can't see it happening. We don't have a 3rd or 4th round selection. Are we going to pretty much give up our entire draft to bank on one guy, in a deep draft? 

    If they want to trade up anywhere it should be to the top of round 2 to grab a guy who fell out of the 1st. If we can get out of this draft with two of the top-50 prospects that would be a W. 

    They should be able to stay put at #21 and land a decent prospect still. If either of the Russians, But or Simashev, are there (and they might be, like Yurov) they have a very high ceiling and I've seen some boards ranking both in the top-10 (also like Yurov) talent-wise. 

    If they want somebody who can be in the AHL sooner than those guys and are tired of dealing with the KHL politics, there should be somebody like Samuel Honzek (who could be an Ek clone) or Nate Danielson (6'2'', 185 lb middle-6 C) or Charlie Stramel (6'3'' 212lbs 3rd line C) who don't necessarily have high-end talent but will fill up the middle of our lineup and add some much-needed size. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, B1GKappa97 said:

    I've thought about what it would take for us to trade up, but I just can't see it happening. We don't have a 3rd or 4th round selection. Are we going to pretty much give up our entire draft to bank on one guy, in a deep draft? 

    If they want to trade up anywhere it should be to the top of round 2 to grab a guy who fell out of the 1st. If we can get out of this draft with two of the top-50 prospects that would be a W. 

    They should be able to stay put at #21 and land a decent prospect still. If either of the Russians, But or Simashev, are there (and they might be, like Yurov) they have a very high ceiling and I've seen some boards ranking both in the top-10 (also like Yurov) talent-wise. 

    If they want somebody who can be in the AHL sooner than those guys and are tired of dealing with the KHL politics, there should be somebody like Samuel Honzek (who could be an Ek clone) or Nate Danielson (6'2'', 185 lb middle-6 C) or Charlie Stramel (6'3'' 212lbs 3rd line C) who don't necessarily have high-end talent but will fill up the middle of our lineup and add some much-needed size. 

    I'm sympathetic to your concerns about blowing the load to get one guy. The team does have two second-round picks, so I'd be ecstatic if the team finds a way to keep one of them and package the other one with our first to move up for Moore. I wrote a lot about trade ideas here if you're interested to learn more. 

    There's a great trade chart here as well: 

    https://soundofhockey.com/2022/06/06/examining-the-value-of-nhl-draft-picks/

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    22 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    Justin, we just couldn't get in, lots to talk about. I think you hit the ball out of the park with the suggestion. According to the combine, Moore is up to 195, and he did pretty well in the strength and jumping portions of the combine. 

    This is a guy we need to absolutely go up and get, or convince him his best plan is to stay at the U for graduation and not sign with his drafting team and simply sign here. I'd rather have him in our system though.

    I suspect that the head down through the neutral zone will be corrected fairly quickly when he absorbs a couple of big hits. For me, it would take 3 before I learned not to do that. 

    I do think if he has linemates that can keep up, and Kaprizov can, he'll use them and look for them. Putting his head down seems like the kind of thing you do when you don't see anyone around you and you know you'll need to do it yourself. Playing with Cooley and Snuggerud should alleviate that tendency.

    So, now we've just got to go get him.

    As you may remember I'm not the biggest fan of trading up but it would be so fun to do it for Moore. Even if he's never a true 1C, his speed will make him awesome to watch.

    In fairness to him, I'll point out that "head down" has less to do with having his head down as it does tunnel vision -- he sometimes struggles to see his teammates because he's so focused on carrying the puck into space. I do wonder how much he'll get better at that at the U, although the speed of the NHL game is ridiculous. I always think of Koivu's story about defending a line rush in the NHL for the first time and getting smoked by Patrick Marleau. 

    https://www.theplayerstribune.com/articles/mikko-koivu-minnesota-wild-finland-nhl

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, B1GKappa97 said:

    I've thought about what it would take for us to trade up, but I just can't see it happening. We don't have a 3rd or 4th round selection. Are we going to pretty much give up our entire draft to bank on one guy, in a deep draft? 

    If they want to trade up anywhere it should be to the top of round 2 to grab a guy who fell out of the 1st. If we can get out of this draft with two of the top-50 prospects that would be a W. 

    They should be able to stay put at #21 and land a decent prospect still. If either of the Russians, But or Simashev, are there (and they might be, like Yurov) they have a very high ceiling and I've seen some boards ranking both in the top-10 (also like Yurov) talent-wise. 

    If they want somebody who can be in the AHL sooner than those guys and are tired of dealing with the KHL politics, there should be somebody like Samuel Honzek (who could be an Ek clone) or Nate Danielson (6'2'', 185 lb middle-6 C) or Charlie Stramel (6'3'' 212lbs 3rd line C) who don't necessarily have high-end talent but will fill up the middle of our lineup and add some much-needed size. 

    Also, if you haven't checked out Prasanth Iyer's free draft projections site you've got to. Oliver Moore is featured heavily there so it's easy to look at him, but you can check out a ton of players based on mock draft data going back several years. 

    https://piyer97.shinyapps.io/NHLDraft2023/

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    23 minutes ago, Justin Hein said:

    I'll point out that "head down" has less to do with having his head down as it does tunnel vision -- he sometimes struggles to see his teammates because he's so focused on carrying the puck into space

    Back in my day this was called a 'puck hog'.  He'll figure this out and may grow out of it with the Gophers.  Fiala was this type player too 3-4 years into his NHL career.  Fiala also has all-world hands and motor to evolve and become an 80+ pt NHL'r.  Hoping Wild draft a rugged Canadian winger.  No more tiny centers (Rossi, Kuze) and no more 'puck moving' D-men.  Think Foligno+ with more hockey sense. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    Back in my day this was called a 'puck hog'.  He'll figure this out and may grow out of it with the Gophers.  Fiala was this type player too 3-4 years into his NHL career.  Fiala also has all-world hands and motor to evolve and become an 80+ pt NHL'r.  Hoping Wild draft a rugged Canadian winger.  No more tiny centers (Rossi, Kuze) and no more 'puck moving' D-men.  Think Foligno+ with more hockey sense. 

    Why a Winger (and why Canadian)? I actually think "Fiala but at Center" is an interesting comp for Moore. I think Moore's skating and defensive motor may be better, but the hands aren't on that level. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    ^^^


    There will likely be some very good players left at 21st. 
     

    The lack of high end defenseman and team’s apprehension about player size will mean MN has to pick from lower ranked centers. 
     

    Yager, Stenberg, Ritchie, and Edstrom could be available. There might be some sizable wings worth taking? 
     

    I think the odds of moving up or acquiring another pick in the 1st or 2nd round are slim in reality. I would like to see Addison moved for a pick in the 2nd if possible. To get another big NA center which the Wild need more than defense or a big winger who can score and make plays. Each year there’s talk about the top guys MN never gets a sniff at. Except Rossi when the Wild fell into the hype-trap...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, Justin Hein said:

    Why a Winger (and why Canadian)? I actually think "Fiala but at Center" is an interesting comp for Moore. I think Moore's skating and defensive motor may be better, but the hands aren't on that level. 

    Of course a 1C is every teams first choice but those will be gone by the time our 1st pick comes up in Rd 1 so I'm thinking a rugged Canadian (not a Euro as has been discussed) has the highest probability of Judd 'the pud' to not klang the pick off the up-right.  Not another middling, big body Euro whose ceiling is Nino Niedereiter (yep, I'm already bored of Ohgren) 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, B1GKappa97 said:

    I've thought about what it would take for us to trade up, but I just can't see it happening. We don't have a 3rd or 4th round selection. Are we going to pretty much give up our entire draft to bank on one guy, in a deep draft? 

    I think you're focusing too much on a very small box. Just because we don't have a 3rd or 4th shouldn't kill the move. We need to get creative, include players and future drafts in the picture. I'd much rather have another 1st in this draft rather than one in '24 (top 10 protected). 

    Moore could be out of reach and taken in the top 10, I don't think we can get there, but in the early teens, there are teams that are in win now modes that we have help for, and we could, perhaps, swing a deal with them. If we've got player help and a future 1st, that could be a win for that organization.

    Note to Billy G, don't forget to pack your backup batteries already charged, you'll need them! This time, at the draft, Guerin needs to be laser focused on the draft, trades, and other GMs. This is the wrong time to talk to agents.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 minutes ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    Of course a 1C is every teams first choice but those will be gone by the time our 1st pick comes up in Rd 1

    This is a draft where you can get a Getzlaf or Kesler down where we're at. Plenty of centers can be had in our 21 area. We need 2 of them, though.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    Sorry, I'm just too greedy this offseason.🤑

    To quote an oldish movie: "Greed is good". I still think that with the guys the Wild have as prospects they have the capital to move up and snag a quality center. There won't be room for all these guys to move up so why not move them out for even higher quality?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    ^^^
     

    I’d agree that the assets the Wild has accumulated through the draft is pretty solid. What team would trade their picks for what the Wild have? The way I see it, Minnesota has Rossi and Addison who have potential-factor but don’t fit a Wild-mold.

    If either of those guys plus #21 could move the Wild up would Detroit or Arizona do it? That’s inexpensive guys who are ahead in age from a 2023 pick. Maybe the Wild offer Detroit Addison, #21 and a 2nd for 9th overall?

    That would help MN get a nice center but does Detroit like Addison and would they move back? They’ve got lots of picks. If they added one and got a NHL level guy for next season, would that be worth the value of 9th? Detroit would have a nice run of picks in the 2nd in that scenario but they’re building so I would expect them to keep 9th no matter what. Be nice though to get one of their picks around 40th if they’d take Addison and perhaps a 2024 2nd?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just listened to Russo and LaPanta podcast. One question sent in was whether  AZ would take Rossi and a pick for Cooley. I could get behind that. Cooley isn't a lot bigger than Rossi but he plays much bigger and has some rat to him.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...