Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness
  • What Can the Wild Expect From Their First-Round Pick?


    Image courtesy of Screenshot: YouTube Channel "Oz Karaduman"
    Justin Hein

    With last night’s win over the Seattle Kraken, the Dallas Stars cemented the Minnesota Wild’s draft position at No. 21 overall. Surely this won’t impact the plans of the front office. But for fans, it really opens the doors to think about what the team can get with its first-round pick this year. 

    Despite his buyer's mentality at this year’s trade deadline, general manager Bill Guerin was adamant that this year wasn’t the year to sell a first-round pick to try and go on a playoff run. That begs the question: Why did they so adamantly want to keep a pick on the edge of the top 20? 

    I combed through five drafts’ worth of picks 19 through 23 to find out. To leave room for late bloomers, I selected draft classes between 2014 and 2018. Within these 25 draft selections lies a glimpse into Minnesota’s future. 

    image.png

    First, let’s talk about the bad. How often do the players taken in these spots turn into busts? By my judgment, five players didn't pan out in this spot – a 20% bust rate. These players struggled to make an NHL roster, and have since flamed out. Many of them are still playing in the AHL, KHL, or various European minor leagues.

    On top of this, there were six players who I termed “replacement-level.” These gentlemen had a stint in the NHL, but most of them never stepped beyond AHL/NHL tweener status. They get called up for about half of the season when needed, and spend the rest of the season in the AHL. They’re certainly more valuable than a bust, but most of their value is that they can be a warm body their team can recall on a whim. Overall, this means that the Wild have a 56% chance of selecting a meaningful contributor. 

    Just above this category are the “specialists.” These players are basically replacement-level with seasoning. Some are great power play players or have elite shooting talent, but they all struggle to contribute at five-on-five.

    Of these, I named two (Joshua Norris and Kasperi Kapanen) and considered including Tony DeAngelo. These three make up the middle class of this draft slot, which is interesting because it’s indicative of the prospects left late in the first round. They typically have one or two skills that jump off the tape, but they also have something severely limiting in their game. 

    Keep this in mind as draft profiles and mock drafts start projecting the names Minnesota might call at 21. As exciting as each prospect’s superpower attribute may be, it might not be enough to make up for whatever holes exist in their game. 

    This idea is especially poignant when considering the good players taken around pick 21, of which there are many. There are four top-six forwards (Robert Thomas, Joel Eriksson Ek, Nick Schmaltz, and Robby Fabbri), three middle-six forwards (Isac Lundestrom, Filip Chytil, and Brock Boeser), and one bottom-six forward (Kailer Yamamoto). On the defensive side of things, there are two second-pair defensemen (K’Andre Miller and DeAngelo). Ryan Merkley doesn't fall into any particular category yet, because he hasn’t yet solidified himself in a lineup. However, he appears to be on an upward trajectory. There was even an exciting goalie pick in Ilya Samsonov, who’s generating Vezina Trophy buzz

    These are some exciting names. Wild fans are likely familiar with Eriksson Ek, as well as Schmaltz, Fabbri, and Thomas. These players have been established Central Division foes for several years, and count a true top-line center among their ranks in Schmaltz. On the other hand, there is a limited ceiling here. None of these players are franchise-altering by any means. That concern is certainly ammunition for those who detest Minnesota's reluctance to enter a rebuild. 

    The timeline these players took from draft pick to NHLer is also very clear. For the most part, the success stories became established players in their third or fourth season after being drafted. Fabbri was the absolute fastest contributor. He became a meaningful contributor in his second season after the draft, but he was the only example. It’s noteworthy that Liam Öhgren and Danila Yurov, who Minnesota drafted last year at Nos. 19 and 24 overall, respectively, are on this same timeline based on Guerin's comments over the past few months. 

    The most likely success story would be seeing a draft pick arrive during the 2025-26 season, and probably no sooner. They'd likely arrive during the first season without the most onerous dead cap hits from Ryan Suter and Zach Parise's buyouts. Coincidentally, that's also the final season of Kirill Kaprizov’s contract. The more you dig into the front office’s moves, the more it’s clear that this is the target for Minnesota’s Stanley Cup window. It seems that this year’s first-round pick should also be along for that ride if all goes well. And it would also help to add a good young piece with Kaprizov in a contract year. 

    The final factor we should take into account is this should all be considered in the context of this year’s draft class. Without getting too deep into individual prospects, this is widely considered one of the best draft classes in recent memory. Not only is this class loaded with top-end talent such as Connor Bedard, but it’s incredibly deep. Byron Bader, who runs Hockey Prospecting, is predicting that this could be the best draft class in decades: 

    Imagine dropping a 60-point scorer onto this franchise along with around $13 million of cap space in the same year. That’s the reason Guerin was reluctant to part with his first-rounder, even with a boatload of deadline cap space and a buyer’s mentality. Minnesota’s roster may be in for a rough couple of years, but the State of Hockey should get excited about this draft. On June 28, this team is going to add another exciting prospect, and the team’s future will be just a bit clearer than it is today. 

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Thanks 2

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    I’m looking at Riley Heidt even though not too big. I don’t think Moore or Danielson are there at 21st.

    I've got a feeling Brackett goes for Molgaard though. Trying to prove guruism. I would like it if they could get him in the 2nd round. Maybe they could wheel a trade to bump up from 53rd using their other 2nd. Perhaps they could move Zuccarello and pick up a third 2nd rounder to target centers between 21st and 53rd overall? That’d be pretty sweet.
     

    Normally I’m not suggesting elite Swede solutions but a center playing SHL in their draft year is pretty good. Maybe the Wild could get him 53rd.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Protec said:

    looking at Riley Heidt even though not too big.

    Looks like he is a smallish C prospect who's very good at skating and passing, although less dangerous as a primary goal scorer. In short, similar to Rossi.

    Sounds like Moore will go top 15. Heidt could end up close to the Wild selection. Danielson is less certain to go top 15 and might also be close to where the Wild select.

    I suspect the Wild may have eyes on forwards like Danielson or Colby Barlow if either is there at #21. Honzek or Koehn Ziemmer may also get long looks(particularly if they should trade back with the Blues to get an extra 1st).

    Don't know if they'll be coveting D given that they have a number of quality prospects there already, but it's not out of the realm of possibility.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Justen, looks like you did a deep dive, but forgot one important element? Who's doing the picking? If you watched the game winning goal last night you'll see a player who was picked  in 2021 by Dallas in the 1st round (23rd overall) Wyatt Johnston.

    I have TWO WORDS for you: Judd Brackett 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    30 minutes ago, Tony Abbott said:

    I'd say they have more quality forward prospects than D.

    I can understand that, particularly if you say Faber is no longer in the prospect pool. Of the top 14 skaters in the prospect pool listed by the Athletic, 6 of them were D with 8 forwards.

    Considering teams generally suit up twice as many forwards as defensemen, it seems somewhat skewed towards defensemen on raw numbers, but if you take Faber out of the mix, it does leave 5 of the remaining top 6 as forwards, so you could probably make a case either way.

    I notice that Hunter Haight, Mike Milne, and Kyle Masters also did not make the top 15, so feelings on those guys could also alter someone's perception.

    After the Wild dropped to 22nd in scoring this season, I think many might be leaning towards skilled forwards with some size, but getting the best player is ideal regardless of position, if the Wild can identify the best prospects.

    The draft lists all vary substantially, and individual NHL teams are likely to vary significantly from any online draft board, so hard to know for sure who will be there when the Wild draft. I imagine there will be some quality D prospects late in the 1st as well.

    1
    Jesper Wallstedt
    G
    20
    Iowa
    2
    Marco Rossi
    C
    21
    Iowa/Minnesota
    3
    Liam Ohgren
    LW
    18
    Djurgarden
    4
    Danila Yurov
    RW/LW
    19
    Magnitogorsk
    5
    Brock Faber
    RHD
    20
    Minnesota
    6
    Carson Lambos
    LHD
    20
    Winnipeg
    7
    Marat Khusnutdinov
    C
    20
    St. Petersburg
    8
    Jack Peart
    LHD
    19
    St. Cloud State
    9
    Adam Beckman
    LW
    21
    Iowa
    10
    David Spacek
    RHD
    19
    Sherbrooke
    11
    Caedan Bankier
    C/LW
    20
    Kamloops
    12
    Rieger Lorenz
    LW
    18
    Denver
    13
    Daemon Hunt
    LHD
    20
    Iowa
    14
    Ryan O’Rourke
    LHD
    20
    Iowa
    15
    Servac Petrovsky
    C
    18
    Owen Sound
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Quote

    Looks like he is a smallish C prospect who's very good at skating and passing, although less dangerous as a primary goal scorer. In short, similar to Rossi.

    Perhaps depending on where you look. I see him listed closer to 6’ than Rossi and heavier with more grit. Tied with Bedard for assists in the WHL so not crazy to suggest he’s similar to Rossi but I would argue NA kids who come from SK and played their way onto WHL teams have a different quality. Jarvis was almost the same exact type of player from the WHL. Brayden Point too, Barzal too. I am just saying the Wild’s position at 21st could put them between the bigger top tier guys and the bigger bodied second tier talent guys like Danny Nelson or perhaps Calum Ritchie.

    I’m with you on the contradiction between ragging on little Euro players only to suggest a 5’10”/5’11” guy. Ultimately, the Wild would wanna target guys who are big and can skate. That’s not a teachable thing necessarily. Equally important for me is the guy’s determination level. Going gets tough factor so to speak. 
     

    Looking at how the Wild got burned in 2020 and how Wyatt Johnston who was selected just after the Wild took Wallstedt it’s evidence to me that the Wild should go hard on centers who can skate. Hintz is another one the Wild didn’t get cause somebody traded the picks away and now these fast players who can really wheel are burning the Wild while we wait for players to develop and lick our wounds from shitty GM decisions and so-called draft gurus...

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Dallas has had some big hits in the draft the last 8 years, getting Hintz one pick prior to Greenway in 2015.

    The 2017 draft really set them up nicely when they added Heiskanen at #3(finished the prior season as the 7th worst team and moved up via lottery), then added Oettinger at #26 and Jason Robertson at #39.

    Colorado was by far the worst team in the league that 2016-2017 year, so had to settle for Cale Makar at #4 when 3 teams jumped ahead of them in the lottery--Flyers really botched that one. After adding Landeskog(#2 overall) in 2011, MacKinnon(#1) in 2013, and Rantanen(#10) in 2015, Makar was the last elite player they needed to develop into a powerhouse.

    The 2017 draft is the year of the Hanzal torpedo. Not only did he ruin the team chemistry, he also cost them their 1st and 2nd round picks, eliminating the opportunity to draft Oettinger or Robertson. I like Mason Shaw, but if he's the most you got from a draft, it wasn't the best draft year for your club.

    I believe Dallas drafted well the last 2 years as well. While Wyatt Johnston is the only surefire NHLer of them so far, they added a lot of prospect talent.

    For Guerin, adding Addison and Lambos for Zucker may end up looking great a few years down the road. Moving Fiala for Faber and Ohgren might look like a gem in a few years as well. I have trouble faulting them for taking Wallstedt over Wyatt Johnston. Johnston seemed a great prospect and is looking good for his age with a very solid veteran cast around him, but Wallstedt was projected top 10 and may develop into a cup-level goalie.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    These are some of the players I really like in no particular order.

    What are people’s thought on the upcoming draft? Who do you guys want and why?

    Most are centers and one Defenseman. I really hope it’s a center that they pick with some size. Would be fantastic if they could get 2 big and talented Centers and one more big Dman in the 1st through 3rd round.

     

    This draft is stacked I almost wish they’d trade a player to get another 2nd.

     

    Nate Danielson C 6’1, R, Proj 8th to 26th

    78pts in Whl

    https://www.eliteprospects.com/player/562426/nate-danielson

    Pros:

    -fast, intelligent center with no obvious flaws in his game.

    -very safe pick

    Cons:

    • Aggressiveness
    • Consistency

    Compared to Yanni Gourde

     

     

    Riley Heidt F/C 5’11, L Proj 11th to 51st

    97pts in Whl

    https://www.eliteprospects.com/player/565748/riley-heidt

    Pros:

    -speed 

    -very good shot

    -compete level

    Cons

    -composure in big game 

    -size

     

     

    Brayden Yager C/W 6’0, R Proj 7th to 25th

    78pts in Whl

    https://www.eliteprospects.com/player/565757/brayden-yager

    Pros:

    -very good shot

    -compete level

    -two way

    Cons:

    -passing

    -playmaking

    -ok skating

     

     

    Calum Ritchie C 6’2, R Proj 10th to 28th

    59pts in Whl 

    https://www.eliteprospects.com/player/603108/calum-ritchie

    Pros:

    -IQ

    -size

    -stick work

    -hard shot 

    Cons

    -unselfish almost to a flaw

    -overall offensive ability 

    -speed

    -inconsistent 

     

     

    Samuel Honzek C/W, 6’4, L Proj 9th to 29th

    56pts

    https://www.eliteprospects.com/player/578968/samuel-honzek

    Pros:

    -Good edges and speed for his size

    -size

    -Offense

    Cons:

    -defensive game

    -work ethic

    -prob more winger than C

     

     

    Matt wood C/RW 6’3, R Proj 11th to 31st

    34pts in NCAA

    https://www.eliteprospects.com/player/603587/matthew-wood

    Pros:

    -PPG as freshman in NCAA 

    -Size

    -Soft hands and great shot

    -Work ethic and maturity

    Cons:

    -Speed, acceleration 

    -Raw

    -more winger than C

     

     

    Ryan Leonard C 5’11, R Proj 7th to 25th

    94pts in NDTP

    https://www.eliteprospects.com/player/603021/ryan-leonard

    Pros:

    -versatility, very good at C, lw and rw

    -two way

    -speed

    -good offense 

    Cons:

    -size

    -Proj as more of winger by some

     

    Charlie Stramel F 6’3, R Proj 21st to 43rd

    12pts NCAA

    https://www.eliteprospects.com/player/623837/charlie-stramel

    Pros: 

    -Size and speed for his size

    -physicality and good defensively 

    -power forward with strong hockey IQ and work ethic

    Cons:

    -inconsistent 

    -acceleration, takes time to reach top speed

    -playmaking

     

     

    Lukas Dragicevic RHD 6’2, Proj 16th to 50th

    75pts Whl

    https://www.eliteprospects.com/player/529817/lukas-dragicevic

    Pros:

    -Size, passing and skating

    -Durable and confident 

    -Skilled

    Cons:

    -Takes to many chances

    -defensive play

    -started playing defense in 2020

     

    David Enstrom C 6’3, L Proj 22nd to 60th

    4pts in 11games SHL, 

    https://www.eliteprospects.com/player/608308/david-edstrom

    Pros:

    -Big two way Center

    -compete level, hard worker

    -good skater for size

    Cons:

    -not offensively flashy

    Comparable Nhl player: Joel Eriksson Ek

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 hours ago, Protec said:

    I’m looking at Riley Heidt even though not too big. I don’t think Moore or Danielson are there at 21st.

    I've got a feeling Brackett goes for Molgaard though. Trying to prove guruism. I would like it if they could get him in the 2nd round. Maybe they could wheel a trade to bump up from 53rd using their other 2nd. Perhaps they could move Zuccarello and pick up a third 2nd rounder to target centers between 21st and 53rd overall? That’d be pretty sweet.
     

    Normally I’m not suggesting elite Swede solutions but a center playing SHL in their draft year is pretty good. Maybe the Wild could get him 53rd.

    I don’t see anything particularly great with Molgaard. He’s projected to go in the mid 2nd round.

    if he picked him in the first it would be a travesty.

    7pts in 41 games isn’t really impressive to me.

    David Enstrom had 4pts in 11 games and he’s 6’3.

    there should be much better options in the 1st round, even in the 2nd I would think.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 hours ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    Looks like he is a smallish C prospect who's very good at skating and passing, although less dangerous as a primary goal scorer. In short, similar to Rossi.

    Sounds like Moore will go top 15. Heidt could end up close to the Wild selection. Danielson is less certain to go top 15 and might also be close to where the Wild select.

    I suspect the Wild may have eyes on forwards like Danielson or Colby Barlow if either is there at #21. Honzek or Koehn Ziemmer may also get long looks(particularly if they should trade back with the Blues to get an extra 1st).

    Don't know if they'll be coveting D given that they have a number of quality prospects there already, but it's not out of the realm of possibility.

     

    Colby Barlow is a LW. We’ve got enough of those.

    I feel like it’s safe to say we need a couple of Big Centerman and maybe a big physical defensman.

    Koehn Ziemmer is a 6ft RW projected to go in 2nd round even though he has good stats.

    there should be better players available in the first. I hope they go with a C.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 hours ago, Mateo3xm said:

    I hope they go with a C.

    Everyone would love a C with size and elite tools. Where the Wild are picking, the higher end players who fit that description might be gone. At that point, do you take an undersized guy who can play C, a bigger center who is clearly not as skilled at their current development stage, or do you take the bigger skilled players elsewhere?

    That's a tough decision every year.

    Ziemmer is projected 2nd round by some, and late 1st by some. He was part of the reason Heidt put up so many points on the year, and Heidt was part of the reason Ziemmer put up so many points. Which one will transition to the NHL best is up for debate.

    Heidt has elite skating/passing while Ziemmer may have fewer elite traits, but delivers goals and perhaps a more well-rounded game. He's likely more physically ready. Heidt also might be gone by 21.

    One of the people at The Hockey Writers has Ziemmer rated #21 overall. They are not the only ones who have him as a top 30 player, but I was also suggesting the Wild could possibly add him if they trade down in the 1st.

    https://thehockeywriters.com/koehn-ziemmer-2023-nhl-draft-prospect-profile/

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm liking Danielson and Ritchie at this point. If we got a large RHS defender, I could see that, but if we take another LW, I'll probably rip apart my shirt!

    This article by Justin was spot on with one exception.  He addressed it, but didn't really do the research. This draft is supposed to rival 2003. 2015 was also a really good draft. But, let's look at 2003.

    • 17- Zach Parise
    • 18- Eric Fehr
    • 19- Ryan Getzlaf
    • 20- Brent Burns
    • 21- Mark Stuart
    • 22- Marc-Antoine Pouliot   lol Edmonton
    • 23- Ryan Kesler
    • 24- Mike Richards

    Others available were Corey Perry, Loui Eriksson, Patrice Bergeron, Shea Weber, and, of course, Joe Pavelski.

    Shooter has pretty much delegated the draft to Judd Brackett, but perhaps he can swing a deal for somewhere around 12 not giving up our 21. Could this be the year that Shooter takes back some of the final decision power? 

    I would love to find our version of Ryan Getzlaf or Ryan Kesler in this current group. I'd like to hear that Guerin is taking a larger role in the interview process. 

    To me, this is the final year of the build up in the retool. I'd expect the next 2 years to be pretty difficult results wise for the team, however, like the past 2 seasons, I'll be looking at growth of the kids as the benchmark. I would expect us to have good draft slots the next 2 years, unless we continue overachieving. 

    So, what that means is simple. We've got a 1st and 2 2nds already on our list. I'd like to see us trade our 2024 1st, top 15 protected and maybe the 2nds to try and get 2 more mid level 1sts. That doesn't include the players/prospects it will take to accomplish this. And then, we can't whiff. 

    I would expect that the 3 1sts this year, the 2 firsts last year and The Wall will be ready at approximately the same time. I'd also believe that Lambos will be ready shortly prior to that group, and, we'd have Khus, O'Rourke and Hunt coming in about the same time. Not all will make it, but the turnover should be right about '24. 

    I'd target AZ at 12 and Detroit at either 9 or 17. All prospects would be on the table, as would Zuccarello, Addison, and Foligno. I'd go all centers with each pick and hope I found 2 gems.

     

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Not too sure on kid named Koehn, pronounced "Cone". Maybe the Wild can find a guy named "Pylon" in the draft? 

    Aho and Hintz went second round, I'm looking at Molgaard playing SHL with men in his draft year so total points compared to Canadian juniors isn't gonna be easy to compare. I'm mostly just joking about draft-gurus and their need to prove great future-vision like Brackett did on Juolevi or Fenton with Fil Johhannsson. Pass on reliable North American picks for  Scandinavian secret studs.

    Personally, I'm mentally preparing for Brackett to go outside the box and allow Dallas, Nashville, and STL to get the guys who will burn the Wild in a year or two while MN waits for the Bombardir, McLeod, Hendricks development program to inject the grit into Swedes and Austrians.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Quote

    I'd target AZ at 12 and Detroit at either 9 or 17. All prospects would be on the table, as would Zuccarello, Addison, and Foligno. I'd go all centers with each pick and hope I found 2 gems.

    How bout since Jarry is expiring in Pittsburgh for 3.5M, GMBG tries to move up to 14th with Fleury and the 21st pick? 
     

    That would give the Wild some better center options if you only have one 1st round pick or allow them to get a specific guy they like.

    Another suggestion would be to trade a player with the Wild’s lesser second round pick or a 2024 pick for either Arizona’s 12th or Detroit’s 17th overall. If the Wild could get two centers in the first that would be really nice. Zuccarello in Detroit or Arizona for a year wouldn’t be a terrible fit. The Wild could sweeten the pot with futures and perhaps those teams would do a trade. Zuccarello + Rossi or Addison plus a pick might be enough to get 12th or 17th.
     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    23 hours ago, Protec said:

    Another suggestion would be to trade a player with the Wild’s lesser second round pick or a 2024 pick for either Arizona’s 12th or Detroit’s 17th overall. If the Wild could get two centers in the first that would be really nice. Zuccarello in Detroit or Arizona for a year wouldn’t be a terrible fit. The Wild could sweeten the pot with futures and perhaps those teams would do a trade. Zuccarello + Rossi or Addison plus a pick might be enough to get 12th or 17th.

    This was exactly how I was thinking. I'd think that Detroit is at the point where both Zuccarello and Addison would be good additions to their club. If I'm including Rossi in this mix, I've got to insist on #9, but wouldn't mind including a top 2024 protected pick in the mix. I was hoping for something like #53+Addison=#17. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...