Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • The Wild Should Cash In On the Sam Bennett Craze


    Image courtesy of Sam Navarro - Imagn Images
    Tony Abbott

    Over the past two months, Sam Bennett has made NHL general managers everywhere go, Hell yeah, that's the kind of guy we need in the playoffs.

    Bennett is now the favorite to win the Conn Smythe Trophy, and why shouldn't he be? He's got 14 goals and 20 points, all while providing speed and toughness for the Florida Panthers as they seek their second-straight Stanley Cup.

    There's even a good possibility that GMs everywhere will get a crack at getting a Sam Bennett-type player in... Sam Bennett. The soon-to-be 29-year-old will hit the open market unless Florida re-signs their pending UFA center. Many teams will want his services, and one will likely pay an absolute premium for them.

    Still, there's only one Sam Bennett, which means that, wherever he signs, a bunch of GMs will still be looking for that kind of player. A player who has a nose for the net and one who's kind of a jerk on the ice.

    It's hard to see the Minnesota Wild landing Bennett. The team has just under $16 million in cap space this summer, and Bennett would take up at least half of that room. As much appeal as having a Bennett-type would have for a Wild squad that hasn't won a playoff round in a decade, they likely need to aim higher than a player with a career-high of 51 points.

    That doesn't mean Minnesota can't benefit from the coming Bennett craze. Striking out on Bennett shouldn't stop a GM's need to get their hands on a Bennett-esque player. It should only stoke those flames, and the Wild are in a position to take advantage of that with Ryan Hartman

    No one is going to mistake Hartman for Bennett. Hartman doesn't have the reputation that comes with being part of a team that's made the Stanley Cup Final back-to-back-to-back. Hartman, 30, is also two years older than Bennett, giving him less appeal on the open market.

    Still, they're very similar players. Over the last four years, Bennett has scored 89 goals and 181 points in 279 games, which works out to 26 goals and 53 points every 82 games. Meanwhile, Hartman has 81 goals and 173 points over 284 games, giving him a similar 82-game pace statline of 23 goals and 50 points. As for their playstyles, Bennett has a reputation for being an agitator, and Hartman is... well, let's have Jake Middleton take it from here.

    That last part is the X-Factor for teams. Finding a 50-point player isn't especially tough for a GM, even in this weak-ish free-agent class. The trouble is finding a 50-point player who will enable a team to compete with a team like the Panthers, who run deep in agitators. Hartman might be that guy for whatever team finishes as Bennett's second- or third-favorite destination this summer.

    Again, though, we must mention that even being, in Middleton's words, "kinda a POS" doesn't make Hartman equal to Bennett.

    For one, Hartman's antics have had NHL Player Safety fed up with the Wild forward, while Bennett hasn't burned through his goodwill with the institution yet. The NHL suspended Hartman for eight (reduced from 10) games this year for driving Tim Stützle's head into the ice in February, while Bennett avoided suspension after elbowing Anthony Stolarz in the head during the first round. Fair or not, Hartman's reputation (and five career suspensions) indicate that he frequently crosses the line, while Bennett only dances on it.

    Still, you must credit Hartman for coloring within the lines during the playoffs, while being one of Minnesota's most productive postseason performers. He finished third on the team in points (six). If you're looking to point fingers concerning the Wild's inability to put the Vegas Golden Knights away, Hartman's the last person you should look at. 

    While Bill Guerin and the Wild can't market Hartman as Bennett's equal, they could use this offseason to push him as the perfect discount option. Any would-be Bennett suitor could get similar numbers, versatility, and edge in Hartman, all at around half the price. And who's to say that in the right spot, Hartman couldn't put up strong playoff numbers the way Bennett has?

    Given Bennett's last three playoff runs, where he scored 26 goals and 49 points in 59 games, that sounds ridiculous. But Bennett wasn't always Playoff Bennett, either. During the first 45 playoff games of his career, Bennett had just 13 goals and 27 points over six playoff runs, none of which saw his teams advance past the second round.

    Again, Hartman lags behind Bennett in career postseason points (eight goals, 21 points in 41 games). Still, he's picked things up in his last three trips to the playoffs. Four goals and 16 points in 17 games isn't too shabby.

    The problem with floating Hartman is that if he's a Bennett-lite, why not keep him? Don't the Wild need playoff performers with an edge? That argument carries weight, but there are reasons to see if Minnesota can cash in its chips on Hartman now.

    The Wild are looking to take the next step, and they don't have a ton of cap space to do that with. Moving Hartman would clear up to $4 million in cap room for the next two seasons, giving them a bit more ability to add a big-time player and freeing up some room in a lineup full of 30-something forwards

    Furthermore, Bennett presents a surprise opportunity to move a player who was looking like an albatross two months ago. Hartman felt untradeable as recently as April. Teams want an agitator. They don't want a player who's one bad decision from a 20-game suspension. Hartman's playoff series removed some of that stink, showing he can be effective when he controls himself. But what if Guerin doesn't think he can exhibit that self-control for two whole seasons? Then now is the opportunity to cut bait.

    It's a fascinating conundrum for the Wild. Will they roll the dice and stick with their Sam Bennett Lite, taking the good with the bad? While the rest of the league zigs towards finding more playoff-made agitators, will the Wild zag and sell high on their version of that mold of player?

    Thanks to Bennett's ascendancy, Minnesota can exploit the league's newest trend -- if it's bold enough to do so.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 4
    • Thanks 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    On 6/15/2025 at 9:35 AM, mnfaninnc said:

    I think you can top heavy the top 6 a little bit if you also have some ELC contracts mixed in. You get tremendous value in that.

    I would agree with that.  Unfortunately the IA Wild has limited our ELC value.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, MNCountryLife said:

    Unfortunately the IA Wild has limited our ELC value.

    And this is the argument against over marinating the kids. However, this season, we could be going with Buium, Jiricek, Yurov, Ohgren all on ELCs. The Wall is at a comfortable $2.2m.

    These guys should add tremendous value to that lineup, though, only for a year. If Rossi is on a bridge deal, that's another value player. And this is why Rossi is probably worth signing a 7 x $7m over time, but isn't far enough along yet to get it. The back half would project to be excellent value, it's just that the front half would be too low. 

    If Rossi doesn't come into camp heavier and ripped, I think they'll move him and he won't get that large contract here. If he does come into camp heavier and ripped, I think Shooter will think again about the investment in the kid, and maybe give him a mulligan. I think when Shooter and Heinzy looked on the last 1/4 of the season and even before taking the puck off the knee, they did not see even a $5m player. 

    As I mentioned during that stretch, both he and Boldy had a tough task at hand. They were young and needed to lead this team. They needed a point per game, not an average of that and needed to catch fire. Boldy eventually worked out of his slump, but Rossi never did and just wasn't consistent at putting up a point a game. You'd get multipoint games from him and then silence. That eye test was brutal for him, and I can see where he needed to grow as a player. It was just his 2nd year, I'll give everyone that point, but the team needed him badly and many times he just wasn't showing out as a difference maker. 

    On this point, Rossi thinks he's worth 7 x $7m, Guerin thinks it's 5  x $5m and has Lundell's deal to prove it. The guy Rossi uses regressed. I believe Guerin has the stronger argument. Could they settle into a compromise of 6 x $5.5-6m? You might get value for both sides that way. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    19 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    And this is the argument against over marinating the kids. However, this season, we could be going with Buium, Jiricek, Yurov, Ohgren all on ELCs.

    I would expect those 4 to all make the roster.  Which definitely should help the top of the roster.

    I find it interesting that we are all talking about signing players... yet we already have 7 defensemen signed and 12 forwards.  Kirill, Ek, Boldy, Zuc, Foligno, Hartman, Trenin, Freddy, Ogs, Nojo, Vinnie and Yurov.    Rossi would make 13. 

    If Rossi signs... this Roster is full. 

    If Rossi doesn't sign we can sign one player. 

    Every other scenario would require a trade or sending a player down.  BG needs to be creative here.  Freddy, Nojo and Vinnie need to be capable of sending down or sitting in the pressbox.... or LTIR injury prone.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...