Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness
  • The Wild Are Running It Back Next Year Expecting Different Results


    Image courtesy of Isaiah J. Downing-USA Today Sports
    Tony Abbott

    What would happen if you just pressed "Reset" on the 2023-24 Minnesota Wild season? Does a do-over mean that Jared Spurgeon doesn't get hurt? Or perhaps another roll of the dice means Filip Gustavsson doesn't get in a funk? Maybe the Wild dodge that early January injury apocalypse a second time around.

    If the Wild got that second crack at it, would they make up the double-digit gap between them and the playoff teams?

    Good news for anyone who came here to eulogize the eliminated 2023-24 Wild: That "Reset" button happens now. You can view next year's team as a sequel to this year's disappointing squad.

    All your favorite faces are back: Kaprizov, Matt Boldy, Brock Faber, and Joel Eriksson Ek. The supporting cast is also coming back. Your least favorite faces? Probably! Minnesota has 19 players under contract for next year, out of a possible 23 roster spots for around $82 million. Assuming the NHL has a $87.5 million salary cap, they'll have about $5.5 million of salary cap space to work with. Some of that will almost certainly go to Marc-Andre Fleury, a 20th player on the roster.

    That's a staggering amount of continuity for a roster with an average age of 28.7 next year (before the 39-year-old Fleury returns) and 83 points through 78 games. Every flaw in this team has been exposed throughout this season. They score fewer goals at 5-on-5 than also-rans in the Arizona Coyotes and Calgary Flames, and that's with a very productive top line. Their goaltending is in the bottom third of the league. It's a rough combination to deal with.

    There's almost no flexibility to improve next season. Most of the supporting cast are entering or advancing further into their 30s. How can they possibly improve next year?

    As difficult as it seems to imagine this adrift team bouncing back to playoff contention in 2024-25, there is a path. As noted, many small things broke poorly for the Wild this year. So, let's hit that metaphorical reset button and see what can go better for Minnesota next season.

    The very obvious first thing that can go right for the Wild in 2024-25 is having Spurgeon healthy next year. Spurgeon has been the one constant in Minnesota since 2012, when the Wild launched themselves into permanent playoff contention with constantly mediocre results — until he got hurt in training camp and was limited to 16 games.

    Remarkably, Spurgeon's absence isn't talked about more, honestly. In his previous four seasons, Spurgeon averaged 4.2 Standings Points Above Replacement (SPAR), which includes both the COVID-shortened 2019-20 and 2020-21 seasons. His return will be massive, even without making up the full gap between Minnesota and the playoff teams in the Western Conference.

    Spurgeon's return would also have ripple effects throughout the roster, particularly on Faber. The presumptive Calder Trophy finalist is having an excellent year as a workhorse defenseman, but it's clear that months of averaging nearly 26 minutes a night are taking a toll. That's to be expected with a rookie going from 30-40 game seasons in the NCAA to the grind of an 82-game season. But Spurgeon easing some of that load will help, along with Faber's preparations this summer, to hold up better over the long haul.

    The Wild could get another boost if Kaprizov enters the offseason healthy. A lower-body injury he sustained at the end of last season seemed to hamper the star player until around mid-December. From December 19 on, he scored 34 goals and 65 points in 42 games. A 66-goal, 127-point season seems out of a realistic possibility for a full season of Kaprizov, but a hotter start than his eight goals and 25 points in his first 29 games seems plausible. 

    That's especially true if the Wild ride their combination of Kaprizov, Joel Eriksson Ek, and Matt Boldy for most of the season. Minnesota didn't go to this line until John Hynes took over, but it's been spectacular. They've out-scored opponents by a 28-15 margin at 5-on-5 and are one of the best lines in terms of controlling expected goals. We've seen lines get hot one year and cool off the next (see: Boldy and Eriksson Ek with Marcus Johansson), but those three being great together simply makes sense. 

    Secondary scoring is the main area for improvement other than goaltending, which feels too obvious to list here. Ryan Hartman, Marcus Foligno, Marcus Johansson, and Mats Zuccarello combined for 32 5-on-5 goals this season. The Wild will need more from that group or players to grow into those roles.

    Marat Khusnutdinov, Vladislav Firstov, and Liam Öhgren will likely compete for a roster spot, with the outside chance Riley Heidt can make a training camp push. That doesn't necessarily mean any of them will be ready. Khusnutdinov is merely hanging in there during a short stint in the NHL now. But if one or more are prepared for top-nine NHL action, that can only help by giving someone like second-line center Marco Rossi support.

    Can the Wild run it back and expect different results? All we know is that our gut says maybe. But it's hard to imagine things breaking worse for the Wild than they did this year, and Minnesota still took until April 9 to be eliminated from the playoffs. It's not difficult to imagine things breaking right, and if they do, Minnesota might have something to watch around this time next year. 

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 5

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    58 minutes ago, FredJohnson said:

    Is there really a risk of damaging a prospect by playing him for 6-9 games with real minutes? GMBG and Hynes have new long-term contracts - are they afraid of being fired?? Beckman getting 5 minutes on the 4th line for 2 games then sitting in the press box for 2-3 games is NOT what I'm looking for.

    The only way I can rationalize the moves made this year is that Leipold is pressing so hard to make the playoffs that desperate moves/decisions are being made.

    I think you may be right on the OCL thing, but even he had to be waving the white flag earlier. I thought Beckman's game was getting better with each game played. He was up on the 3rd line last I saw. But, Heinzy does have a tendency to shorten his bench. 

    I'd like to see real tryouts too. You might as well play the kids and see what they can do, especially now that we're eliminated. 

    Also, I don't know if you guys caught this, but it appears that Pittsburgh has scratched and clawed it's way into playoff seeding now. It's still a close call, but the East is very interesting, and my prediction of Sully being available may not actually happen this year. I still believe that this is who Guerin wants as his championship coach. 

    It's looking more and more likely we've got Heinzy again next season.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    Heinzy does have a tendency to shorten his bench.

    It's looking more and more likely we've got Heinzy again next season.

    I've been clenching my teeth every time Dolla gets double-shifted hoping he doesn't get hurt.

    Heinzy is cemented as the HC for a couple years (unless the team takes an absolute dump). He's got a 3 year contract after this one, no?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    13 minutes ago, FredJohnson said:

    Heinzy is cemented as the HC for a couple years (unless the team takes an absolute dump). He's got a 3 year contract after this one, no?

    My thought was that if Sully became available, Heinzy would be "promoted" to the front office. I do believe he and Guerin are good friends and he's a good hockey mind to have in there. O'Hearn filled 2 roles, capologist and bounce ideas off guy. The cap guy doesn't have to be the close confident. That could be Heinzy, and get a separate set of eyes on things. 

    The thing about the coaches is that sometimes you have to pluck them up when they become available. It doesn't always work that when you need one they're available. Could it be that Sullivan starts out in the FO? Maybe, he can take a look at the whole organization and see what's coming. 

    I do think all 3 of them can work together well, though. Sully's had a little more success in the league coaching. So, I'd see this as similar to how Brackett fell into Guerin's lap and just in time for the draft. 

     

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    Heinzy would be "promoted" to the front office. I do believe he and Guerin are good friends and he's a good hockey mind to have in there. O'Hearn filled 2 roles, capologist and bounce ideas off guy. The cap guy doesn't have to be the close confident. That could be Heinzy, and get a separate set of eyes on things.

    Oh good point. That'd fill the still open spot for a capologist (makes sense why the position is still open).

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, FredJohnson said:

    Oh good point. That'd fill the still open spot for a capologist (makes sense why the position is still open).

    We'll see if Heinzy enrolls in summer accounting classes!🤪

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 4/11/2024 at 7:16 AM, Protec said:

    Personally, I haven't had much problem with MAF this season.

    How do you not see an issue with a 40 year old goaltender who’s got a saves percentage of .905 and a goals against average of 2.82 over the last 3 years they’ve played with Mn?

    Somehow Rossi, the rookie who scored 20 plus goals this year is part of the issue and needs to be moved?..I agree this team needs to get bigger but Rossi its absolutely the last of the small players I’d get rid of (goes without saying about Kap).

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 4/11/2024 at 11:51 AM, Citizen Strife said:

    Spent a little time doing some rough math.  Here's what both the 10 GF and GA for the highest scoring/defensive and the top 10 overall teams did, and what the Wild are in comparison.

    Goals For Per Game (Top 10 Overall)

    1. NYR: 274
    2. DAL: 293
    3. CAR: 267
    4. BOS: 260
    5. VAN: 270
    6. COL: 296
    7. FLA: 256
    8. WIN: 241
    9. EDM: 279
    10. TOR: 288

    Total of Top 10 Winning Teams: 2,724
    AVG of Top 10 Winning Teams: 272
    Divided by 77-78 Games: 3.49-3.55 GF P/G

    Goals For Per Game (Top 10 Highest Scoring)

    1. COL: 296
    2. DAL: 293
    3. TOR: 288
    4. EDM: 279
    5. TBL: 279
    6. NYR: 274
    7. VAN: 270
    8. CAR: 267
    9. BOS: 260
    10. DET: 258

    Total of Top 10 Scoring Teams: 2,764
    AVG of Top 10 Scoring Teams: 276
    Divived by 77-78 Games: 3.54-3.58 GF P/G

    20 in both Categories. MIN: 237 (35-40 goals behind Top 10)
    3.04-3.05 GF P/G

    Goals Against Per Game (Top 10 Overall)

    1. NYR: 223
    2. DAL: 229
    3. CAR: 206
    4. BOS: 215
    5. VAN: 217
    6. COL: 242
    7. FLA: 196
    8. WIN: 194
    9. EDM: 219
    10. TOR: 241

    Total of Top 10 Winning Teams: 2,182
    AVG of Top 10 Winning Teams: 218
    Divided By 77-78 Games: 2.79-2.83 GA P/G

    Goals Against Per Game (Top 10 Defensive Teams)

    1. WIN: 194
    2. FLA: 196
    3. CAR: 206
    4. LAK: 206
    5. BOS: 215
    6. VAN: 217
    7. EDM: 219
    8. SEA: 219
    9. NYR: 223
    10. DAL: 229

    Total of Top 10 Defensive Teams: 2,124
    AVG of Top 10 Defensive Teams: 212
    Divided By 77-78 Games: 2.72-2.75 GA P/G

    20 Overall/18th Best Defensively: MIN: 249 (30-35 Goals More Than Top 10 Teams)
    Divided By 77-78 Games: 3.17-3.19 GA P/G

     

    Again, this is pretty basic, so bear in mind I don't know how official this is.  What I'm seeing from the majority of the middle of each list is 265-275 Goals For and 215-220 Goals Against is what separates Minnesota from this year's playoff teams.  Note, I did not check bubble teams.  I was purely looking at what it would take to separate Minnesota from teams with 100 pts and easily in playoff position.

    What this is telling me if every player stays where they were, you're only looking at another 2 15-20-goal scorers or one 30-40 goal scorer to really change the dynamic of the team.  That or let in the equivalent of 30-35 goals less overall, and then you hit top 10, and wouldn't need as much an offensive change to really compete for playoff position.

    I definitely think the defense improvement is harder to gauge, but nothing from this tells me Minnesota is so bent down so far it can't be overcome with a few stingy players or 1-2 that explode offensively or even slightly improve to counterract any aging or injury concerns.  

    I don’t think you’re taking into consideration a few things.

    Mn is the 4th oldest nhl team going into this season. We don’t have enough young and upcoming players to offset the regression of our core players. Our team average age is 29.95. Statistically after age 29 there is a pretty consistent regression in production.

    One of the biggest issues is the gap of old core players and up and coming young players. This team will either have geriatric players or players not yet in their statistical prime which starts at 24-26. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 hours ago, Citizen Strife said:

    That is part some forget.  "Tank is a word we've never said here."

    Then use rebuild if it triggers you so much. Almost every Stanley cup team has done it for a period of time to win the Cup. You’re going to be here 10 years from now beating the same dead horse and trying to justify not rebuilding. Nobody wins by consistently picking between 12-25 in the first round.

    its not the only key to win a cup but it’s a major part of the equation.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    22 hours ago, Mateo3xm said:

    Then use rebuild if it triggers you so much. Almost every Stanley cup team has done it for a period of time to win the Cup. You’re going to be here 10 years from now beating the same dead horse and trying to justify not rebuilding. Nobody wins by consistently picking between 12-25 in the first round.

    its not the only key to win a cup but it’s a major part of the equation.

    I don't know.  You seem like your the one beating a dead horse.

    Detroit had a pretty long run and almost all of their picks weren't people they drafted top-10.  Seems like good scouting, development, coaching, and team play do pretty well in lieu of top-10 picks.  That seems to be far more important than top-10 picks.

    I'm not saying that the Wild can overcome that, but your assertion that nobody can win picking into middle just isn't true.  Drafting talent can help, but that's a lot of luck dependent on the draft lottery (luck the Wild have historically never had). 

    There are a lot of teams that barely ever make the playoffs that are consistently drafting those top-10 picks every year.  A good player on a bad team is still a bad team.  If it's such a major part of the equation, so many top-10 picks would have lifted those franchises out of the cellar long ago and at least got them into the playoffs with some sort of regularity.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think the point with MAF is that goalies have shown they can be successful at a ripe age like Mike Smith or Tim Thomas. Craig Anderson wasn't bad and MAF hasn't been letting in soft Dubnyk-type goals. 

    From what I've seen in the eye test is he faces grade A chances that he stops fewer than in his prime. Okay, that's significant if you need a tendy that can steal a game. Problem is MN isn't in a position to be competitive enough to have a goalie steal games for the Wild. I'm still noticing Fleury stopping breakaways or losing in OT. Perhaps the Wild score just twice and Fleury takes an L. 

    My point is NOT that MAF is still a Vezina guy but he's not the sole reason the Wild missed the playoffs or that he's 100% cooked, put a fork in him. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...