Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness
  • The Minnesota Wild Have Already Blown Their Post-Parise/Suter Windfall


    Image courtesy of Isaiah J. Downing-USA Today Sports
    Tony Abbott

    July 1, 2025. Minnesota Wild fans have mentally circled this day on the calendars in their heads for years. On that day, the bulk of the salary cap penalties for Zach Parise and Ryan Suter expire, freeing up a touch more than $13 million for Minnesota. What can a team that has Kirill Kaprizov, Joel Eriksson Ek, and Matt Boldy locked in for discount prices do with an extra $13 million to throw around?

    Any expectations fans are building are destined to disappoint. It'd be nice to see the Wild hit the market and make the kind of franchise-changing move that the Florida Panthers made in acquiring Matthew Tkachuk or the New York Rangers did in signing Artemi Panarin. It probably was never going to happen, though, even with CapFriendly projecting the Wild for $28.66 million of cap space (under a $92 million salary cap).

    The Wild would always need to give Kaprizov a raise, although his contract expires in 2026, and extend Brock Faber once his ELC wraps up in the summer of 2025. Those are just the biggest ticket items. Young centers Marco Rossi and Marat Khusnutdinov will hit RFA status just as that $13 million falls off the cap, as will top goalie prospect Jesper Wallstedt. Even with a (presumably) rising cap and the dead money expiring, those things will offset Minnesota's ability to throw some real dollars around.

    Let's make some conservative salary projections to illustrate this point. Say Faber takes a clone of Boldy's sweetheart deal, earning $7 million per year against the cap. As for Wallstedt, let's say he earns $3.5 million annually on his next deal, about $1 million less than Spencer Knight took with the Florida Panthers after 36 career games. Now we'll mark Rossi and Khusnutdinov's bridge deals clock at $2.5 and $1.5 million, respectively.

    That's probably the best-case scenario for these four upcoming contracts, and even then, they will come in at a $14.5 million price tag. Suddenly, the Wild must fill eight roster spots (Minnesota would have 15 of 23 accounted for) and $14 million to do it with. That's much more flexibility than they've had in the past few offseasons. Still, when you're earmarking a good chunk of that to Kaprizov going forward, it hurts Minnesota's ability to get any long-term impact help.

    So, this windfall the State of Hockey has built in its heads will be less a Scrooge McDuck pool and more of a Mitch Hedberg-esque above-ground pool of money. Where did that spending power go?

    Oh, no...

    Please, make it stop. We beg you.

    Fine, whatever, hopefully you got it out of your system, and we can look ahead to...

    We're not alarmed; we're just desperate for these to end. Please, Minnesota, we have a family.

    To recap: the summer the Wild are having $13 million of dead money disappear from the salary cap completely, they're spending money on the following extensions from the last 12 months:

    Mats Zuccarello (age-38 season): $4.125M
    Marcus Foligno (34): $4M
    Ryan Hartman (31): $4M
    Freddy Gaudreau (32): $2.1M
    Zach Bogosian (35): $1.25M
    Total: $15.475M

    someone who is good at the salary cap please help me budget this. my team is dying

    That's where the ability to get the next Panarin or Tkachuk is. Tied up in five extensions to players in their 30s. The complaint about these extensions is less that any one individual move is objectionable (though Gaudreau and Bogosian's deals probably are) but that they're especially bad in the aggregate. A lot of Minnesota's money is tied up in aging, declining assets and with it, the possibility of being able to add elite talent to the roster.

    It's not a one-to-one comparable to Parise and Suter's dead cap hits, of course. The Wild are filling five roster spots with these players instead of zero from the buyouts. These five players have given Minnesota a combined 7.5 Standings Points Above Replacement this season, much more than the 0.0 Parise and Suter's $14.7 million are contributing to the team.

    If that number starts dropping towards 0.0 in two years, and Father Time has a way of making that happen, the effect will be the same: A big percentage of the salary cap goes towards things that aren't helping the team win. That's not to mention the $1.667 remnants of the Parise/Suter cap hits that will be sticking around over the life of these extensions.

    If we add that dead cap hit to the total cost of the extensions, this is the breakdown, year-by-year, starting in 2025-26:

    2025-26: $17.142M
    2026-27: $11.767M (Zuccarello, Bogosian off the books)
    2027-28: $7.767M (Hartman off the books)
    2028-29: $1.667M (Foligno, Gaudreau off the books)

    It's an incredible amount of money tied up in five (mostly) non-elite players at various points in their 30s and two buyouts. Sure, you can point out that things finally get manageable in 2027-28. But counterpoint: Who cares?

    2025-26 and 2026-27 are the years that Minnesota fans should have been able to expect for their Stanley Cup window. 2025-26 has the last season of Kaprizov in his prime (he'll be 28) and making a bargain-basement $9 million against the cap. Joel Eriksson Ek (ages 28-29) will be on the right side of 30 in both those seasons. Boldy (24-25), Rossi (23-24), Khusnutdinov (23-24), and Faber (23-24) will also be entering their primes, with Wallstedt (23-24) positioning himself as Minnesota's answer to Jake Oettinger. It'll be the last years of Jared Spurgeon's (37-38) deal, and Jonas Brodin (32-33) will also be running out of productive years.

    Plus, the Wild should expect a combination of Danila Yurov, Liam Öhgren, Riley Heidt, and Carson Lambos to emerge over the next two seasons. There should be some real (and cheap!) NHL talent in the 2025-26 and 2026-27 seasons.

    That's the Cup window, the time when the team should be ready to take a big swing. Teams that are ready to take the leap into Stanley Cup contention do this all the time. The Chicago Blackhawks and Boston Bruins signed Marian Hossa and Zdeno Chara, respectively, to free-agent deals in the late 2000s that spurred their runs to Cup glory. Or think of the Los Angeles Kings acquiring Jeff Carter and Mike Richards, the Vegas Golden Knights importing Mark Stone and Jack Eichel, or the St. Louis Blues snagging Ryan O'Reilly. You build a team up, then supplement them with elite talent when the time is right.

    Bill Guerin should know this, as he was in the front office of the mid-2010s Pittsburgh Penguins team that swung big for Phil Kessel and won two Cups in large part because of the move. But how do the Wild land their Kessel now?

    Instead of being able to take a big swing, the Wild has put themselves in a position where they've parlayed their golden opportunity into praying that Zuccarello remains a point-per-game player at 38. They're hoping that injuries and hard miles won't continue to wear Foligno down or that Hartman can either remain a top-six caliber player or provide $4 million of value in a checking role. They're also gambling on Gaudreau and Bogosian having productive years left when the rest of the roster is ready to contend.

    The Wild might be able to overcome this, of course. They have high-end talent in Kaprizov, Boldy, and Faber. Their defensive foundation will be strong as long as Spurgeon, Brodin, and Eriksson Ek are healthy. Getting another star or two from Yurov, Rossi, Khusnutdinov, Öhgren, Heidt, or their 2024 draft pick will go a long way to helping. Heck, if Wallstedt is everything prospect gurus think he can be, an elite No. 1 goalie papers over many flaws.

    If they can get a Stanley Cup out of this group, no one's going to care about these extensions. Flags fly forever. But if this group misses their window coming out of the Parise/Suter Dead Cap Era, then never gets close again? That's a different story, one which will lead to fans second-guessing for years why they willingly put themselves into a second, de facto Dead Cap Era.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 2
    • Haha 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    If any of the new prospects or defenseman end up the "impact players" (i.e. a Faber), Guerin will pay them instead of having to look outside the organization for the help.

    The Wild CAN have nice things.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The only thing you can accuse Guerin of right now is leaving the Wild slightly less flexible to do the "outside help" option in case of emergency.  However, it seems unwise to completely lambaste them when we don't know what Option 1: build from within/draft first is going to do.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Keyboard GM stuff is funny to me. Talk is cheap. Fun to do, but meaningless. 

    In certain professions, or jobs it's your name on the license. You're future, reputation, your insurance is covering for mistakes and the full liability is on you. 

    If you operate in that paradigm full-time, there's no fantasy, perfect-world solutions. You're forced to make tough decisions and you bear the weight of the consequences with your group. Many times you have to work with what you got. No mulligans, no take-backs.

    I'm surprised we don't see more articles showing how sweet it is that Guerin took Fenton's Granlund/Fiala trade and turned it into a #1RD from MN who will be a franchise type Wild player.

    Or how a HOF goalie came in for an average pick and has won a lot of games for MN.

    Or how L1 between EK, Boldy, and Kaprizov are all signed to affordable deals during MN's most difficult stretch after firing Parise/Suter and paying the toll. 

    Instead it's a constant ragfest, ripping on Guerin for signing last season's shootout hero, point-producing lizard, and paying up two loyal, grit guys while the organization drafts extra prospects. 

    Okay, tell me you got GDS without telling me you have Guerin derangement syndrome. 

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    45 minutes ago, Protec said:

    In certain professions, or jobs it's your name on the license. You're future, reputation, your insurance is covering for mistakes and the full liability is on you. 

    If you operate in that paradigm full-time, there's no fantasy, perfect-world solutions. You're forced to make tough decisions and you bear the weight of the consequences with your group. Many times you have to work with what you got. No mulligans, no take-backs.

    Which is why he should make good moves and not bad moves.

    • Like 1
    • Haha 2
    • Confused 1
    • Sad 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 hours ago, Tony Abbott said:

    Full no-move clauses for Hartman, Zuccarello, Foligno. 12 million-plus where the team has absolutely no say over whether they can move. What would you rather have? $12 million to throw around, or those three guys two years later into their 30s?

    Come on! Look at you trying make your point with false information. They don't have full NMC other than the 2yr for a ppg Zucc contract.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, Tony Abbott said:

    Which is why he should make good moves and not bad moves.

    I'm pretty sure no matter who the GM is, many of the same people would be sour grapes. Nevermind the hypothetical mystery GM could be even worse.

    You don't think it's ironic coming off Fletcher & Fentonisms, people are spitting venom at GMBG who's got a better winning percentage than any other 5-year stretch in Wild history? (While having inherited those results.)

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    23 minutes ago, punch_cut said:

    Come on! Look at you trying make your point with false information. They don't have full NMC other than the 2yr for a ppg Zucc contract.

    In 2025-26, the first year of the post-Parise/Suter Era, they're full no-moves.

    In 2026-27, the second year of the post-Parise/Suter Era, the clauses become fairly heavily protected trade clauses (15-team for Foligno, 10-team for Hartman)

    • Sad 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    22 minutes ago, Protec said:

    I'm pretty sure no matter who the GM is, many of the same people would be sour grapes. Nevermind the hypothetical mystery GM could be even worse.

    You don't think it's ironic coming off Fletcher & Fentonisms, people are spitting venom at GMBG who's got a better winning percentage than any other 5-year stretch in Wild history? (While having inherited those results.)

    He stepped into the door as the three most impactful offensive players in franchise history were coming into the league -- none of whom Guerin acquired.

    • Sad 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    So who should have been the guy and what specifically should have been done in your opinion? 

    The GDS crowd rips only and never really says what should have been done alternatively. Who should have been hired and what exactly should they have done? 

    Basically, you're saying anybody could have positioned the Wild into the same or better place by now. That about right?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The doom and gloom reporting and comments get really tiring to read.

    Do we have dead cap now? Yes.

    Do we have a few players that have looked like they don't belong in the big leagues this year? Yes.

    Will Bill G have some tough decisions coming up in the next few seasons? Yes.

    However.

    The Wild have been a good team over the last few years that have been entertaining to watch and besides this year, with the injury-bug and down performances, the team still has a small chance to make the playoffs.

    The Wild have quite a few talented players that bring something to the table and are "character guys." These are guys like Fleury, who would rather struggle here, than potentially win a cup somewhere else. That says something about our culture. We have top-tier young(er) guys like KK97, Ek, Boldy, Faber, and Rossi.

    The Wild have a great prospect pool.

    I have faith that we will be doing just fine and contending for Cups in a few years, not just 1st round exits.

    Enough with "the sky is falling" comments and articles. Balanced coverage is important to have, how about more of that?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Maybe if OCL hired Fitzgerald who has Hischier, 2 Hughes, Mercer, Holtz, and also have not done anything significant to get near a Stanley Cup sniff. That's two #1 overalls, and equal to Boldy draft slots to essentially out-do the Wild in terms of draft capital. NJ ain't doing way better. 

    This is another example of why GDS is now a thing. MN sucks and Guerin should be fired but zero alternative explanation or coherent justification. 

    It's just weird and appears to be totally biased. To the point, no good moves can be recognized, only bad. Haha. 😄

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, Luke Sims said:

    We could still sign Phil Kessell...

    Love it! Now there's a Kwik Trip hot-dog spokesman if there ever was one...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Tony Abbott said:

    In 2025-26, the first year of the post-Parise/Suter Era, they're full no-moves.

    In 2026-27, the second year of the post-Parise/Suter Era, the clauses become fairly heavily protected trade clauses (15-team for Foligno, 10-team for Hartman)

    So Zucc has a full NMC 25-26?  I thought it was 10-team.

    I hope there was something gained for all these restrictions. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Per Capfriendly,

    Freddy - All four years left M-NTC 15 team

    Foligno - 4 Yrs, first two NMC, last two M-NTC 15 team

    Hartman - 3 Yrs, first one NMC, last two M-NTC 10 team

    Zucc - 2 Yrs, both NMC

    Mojo - 1 Yr left NTC

     

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    45 minutes ago, Will D. Ness said:

    So Zucc has a full NMC 25-26?  I thought it was 10-team.

    I hope there was something gained for all these restrictions. 

    He had a 10-team No-Trade last year and this year. Not sure if the 10-team got ripped up for an NMC, or if there was just a gentleman's agreement.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Ok so I finally found the cap friendly info hidden in the weeds for 25-26:

    Foligno and Zucc have full NMC.

    Hartman 15 team NMC.

    Bogo is TBD (looks like no restrictions)

    Spurg 10 team NMC.

    Freddy 15 team NMC.

    Brodin no restrictions after 24-25.

    Brass tacks = 8M tied up.  14M tradable to half the league.

    Could be better but there is flexibility there.

     

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 hours ago, Tony Abbott said:

    impossible

    I’d leave out the nearly. These players are not going anywhere. It’s clear there is no money for a “Big Swing” type of move in the foreseeable future. This is the direction Wild management chose and I accept it. If you need an example of how hard it is to deal with NM NT clauses see AG. MAF is playing good hockey. The real question is who can project when major regression sets in? Hopefully someone in Wild management is willing and capable of doing that for all future extensions. Getting value up and down the lineup requires it. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I don't even get the point this article is trying to make. 

    Most teams in the league probably have 5 mostly non-elite players in their 30s with contracts totalling ~$15M.  An average of $3M each for 5 veteran players on a team isn't outlandish.  In today's NHL, that's not farfetched, and neither are the NMCs, NTCs, and M-NTCs.  Many teams have a number of them.

    It's my belief that many of these players will end up comprising our 4th line.  Ideally a team wouldn't have so much of their salary cap tied up in 4th liners, but if our prospects are good enough to push them down that far, then we won't have much to complain about.

    Time will tell.

    Now, if Guerin adds more non-elite 30-something players with sizable contracts with a long term, then I'd start to agree with you.  Right now, this is more or less typical of any franchise in the league.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    20 hours ago, Burnt Toast said:

    Good point. At the SC podium VGK players were raving about the addition of their new star 1C JE. The Wild are looking at a 10-12$M 4th line in 3 years. I actually like the players they resigned but I liked the Deweys too. I’m not saying there’s not a plan I’m saying I can’t see it nor have I historically seen it. Vegas had strong, big, physical players sprinkled throughout their lineup which you alluded to. I think that’s a must, therefore I think the Stramel pick was an ok situational choice.

    I'd like to highlight this post and go back in time to when Vegas came into the league. Vegas took a lot of 3rd line guys, but they also ended up taking size. This is something that Fletcher should have known about going into the expansion draft, size mattered. 

    What do you expose, then, if you need to expose? Players making a lot of money who don't have size. Haula had some size, speed to burn, and a low level contract, but Tuch had really good size, so that made it work.

    You know who didn't have size? Spurgeon, who was making over $5m at the time. Staal also could have been exposed, even though he had size due to his age. But, instead, Fletcher chose to get rid of no money and players who had size. 

    If you fast forward to the next expansion draft and look at what Seattle liked, size was another factor, especially on defense. Both of these GMs had a track record with other organizations, so they were scoutable, and you could make a logical guess as to what they were going after. 

    While this is not even a little bit of the point of this article, I just thought that BT had an interesting comment that helped explain this pretty well.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Wait just a moment. The extensions start next season while we are still under the heavy lifting of the buyouts. If we can fit that into next year's cap, why can't we fit that into subsequent years? That argument makes no sense.

    But, if we are having to pay rookies/prospects who made it and are performing, like, say Faber and maybe Rossi with the buyout money, well, that's what we have to do. At least they're already here. 

    Do we go the bridge deal route, or go full 8 Xs and sign them through their prime? I think that is the main question here. If we go 8 X $8m on Faber, well, then we have eaten up some cap space. The last 1/2 of that contract is probably quite a bargain. If we go bridge on the extension and then the big contract, we probably have some room.

    The other issue is Kaprizov getting a raise, which he will. Is it a $3m raise? Probably in that neighborhood. So, out of the $13m we are going to suddenly regain, $3m probably goes to Kaprizov, and $7m probably goes to Faber, and some more probably goes to Rossi/Dino/The Wall. Well, that about does it, and the hope is that all of those players will have earned the increase. 

    This really doesn't have anything to do with the extensions, but people like to bitch about them. This has everything to do with the prospects maturing into really good players that we want to keep and that costs money. 

    Out of my estimates, this is all doable and didn't even include the cap increase. This is where we get our player, I guess. Or, we simply rent guys at the TDL.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    Seattle

    The Kraken took Souci. Big, strong and low cost. The Wild lost an important player IMO. He was also the kind of player that resigning works well with cost/age/size. I’m not sure who else could have been exposed to the same draft because of guess what… yup NM NT clauses. I know these are negotiated by agents and are a thing in the NHL but they sure end up limiting team choices. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 hours ago, Protec said:

    I'm pretty sure no matter who the GM is, many of the same people would be sour grapes. Nevermind the hypothetical mystery GM could be even worse.

    You don't think it's ironic coming off Fletcher & Fentonisms, people are spitting venom at GMBG who's got a better winning percentage than any other 5-year stretch in Wild history? (While having inherited those results.)

    Hey , they fired Evason for those same resullts.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 hours ago, Burnt Toast said:

    The Kraken took Souci. Big, strong and low cost. The Wild lost an important player IMO. He was also the kind of player that resigning works well with cost/age/size. I’m not sure who else could have been exposed to the same draft because of guess what… yup NM NT clauses. I know these are negotiated by agents and are a thing in the NHL but they sure end up limiting team choices. 

    They protected 3 D in 7/3/1 configuration. Spurg, brodin, dumba were the right people protected. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    18 minutes ago, punch_cut said:

    configuration

    They were smart to take Souci. I think the Kraken are a couple more years away from contention and heading in the right direction.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...