Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • The Minnesota Wild Have Already Blown Their Post-Parise/Suter Windfall


    Image courtesy of Isaiah J. Downing-USA Today Sports
    Tony Abbott

    July 1, 2025. Minnesota Wild fans have mentally circled this day on the calendars in their heads for years. On that day, the bulk of the salary cap penalties for Zach Parise and Ryan Suter expire, freeing up a touch more than $13 million for Minnesota. What can a team that has Kirill Kaprizov, Joel Eriksson Ek, and Matt Boldy locked in for discount prices do with an extra $13 million to throw around?

    Any expectations fans are building are destined to disappoint. It'd be nice to see the Wild hit the market and make the kind of franchise-changing move that the Florida Panthers made in acquiring Matthew Tkachuk or the New York Rangers did in signing Artemi Panarin. It probably was never going to happen, though, even with CapFriendly projecting the Wild for $28.66 million of cap space (under a $92 million salary cap).

    The Wild would always need to give Kaprizov a raise, although his contract expires in 2026, and extend Brock Faber once his ELC wraps up in the summer of 2025. Those are just the biggest ticket items. Young centers Marco Rossi and Marat Khusnutdinov will hit RFA status just as that $13 million falls off the cap, as will top goalie prospect Jesper Wallstedt. Even with a (presumably) rising cap and the dead money expiring, those things will offset Minnesota's ability to throw some real dollars around.

    Let's make some conservative salary projections to illustrate this point. Say Faber takes a clone of Boldy's sweetheart deal, earning $7 million per year against the cap. As for Wallstedt, let's say he earns $3.5 million annually on his next deal, about $1 million less than Spencer Knight took with the Florida Panthers after 36 career games. Now we'll mark Rossi and Khusnutdinov's bridge deals clock at $2.5 and $1.5 million, respectively.

    That's probably the best-case scenario for these four upcoming contracts, and even then, they will come in at a $14.5 million price tag. Suddenly, the Wild must fill eight roster spots (Minnesota would have 15 of 23 accounted for) and $14 million to do it with. That's much more flexibility than they've had in the past few offseasons. Still, when you're earmarking a good chunk of that to Kaprizov going forward, it hurts Minnesota's ability to get any long-term impact help.

    So, this windfall the State of Hockey has built in its heads will be less a Scrooge McDuck pool and more of a Mitch Hedberg-esque above-ground pool of money. Where did that spending power go?

    Oh, no...

    Please, make it stop. We beg you.

    Fine, whatever, hopefully you got it out of your system, and we can look ahead to...

    We're not alarmed; we're just desperate for these to end. Please, Minnesota, we have a family.

    To recap: the summer the Wild are having $13 million of dead money disappear from the salary cap completely, they're spending money on the following extensions from the last 12 months:

    Mats Zuccarello (age-38 season): $4.125M
    Marcus Foligno (34): $4M
    Ryan Hartman (31): $4M
    Freddy Gaudreau (32): $2.1M
    Zach Bogosian (35): $1.25M
    Total: $15.475M

    someone who is good at the salary cap please help me budget this. my team is dying

    That's where the ability to get the next Panarin or Tkachuk is. Tied up in five extensions to players in their 30s. The complaint about these extensions is less that any one individual move is objectionable (though Gaudreau and Bogosian's deals probably are) but that they're especially bad in the aggregate. A lot of Minnesota's money is tied up in aging, declining assets and with it, the possibility of being able to add elite talent to the roster.

    It's not a one-to-one comparable to Parise and Suter's dead cap hits, of course. The Wild are filling five roster spots with these players instead of zero from the buyouts. These five players have given Minnesota a combined 7.5 Standings Points Above Replacement this season, much more than the 0.0 Parise and Suter's $14.7 million are contributing to the team.

    If that number starts dropping towards 0.0 in two years, and Father Time has a way of making that happen, the effect will be the same: A big percentage of the salary cap goes towards things that aren't helping the team win. That's not to mention the $1.667 remnants of the Parise/Suter cap hits that will be sticking around over the life of these extensions.

    If we add that dead cap hit to the total cost of the extensions, this is the breakdown, year-by-year, starting in 2025-26:

    2025-26: $17.142M
    2026-27: $11.767M (Zuccarello, Bogosian off the books)
    2027-28: $7.767M (Hartman off the books)
    2028-29: $1.667M (Foligno, Gaudreau off the books)

    It's an incredible amount of money tied up in five (mostly) non-elite players at various points in their 30s and two buyouts. Sure, you can point out that things finally get manageable in 2027-28. But counterpoint: Who cares?

    2025-26 and 2026-27 are the years that Minnesota fans should have been able to expect for their Stanley Cup window. 2025-26 has the last season of Kaprizov in his prime (he'll be 28) and making a bargain-basement $9 million against the cap. Joel Eriksson Ek (ages 28-29) will be on the right side of 30 in both those seasons. Boldy (24-25), Rossi (23-24), Khusnutdinov (23-24), and Faber (23-24) will also be entering their primes, with Wallstedt (23-24) positioning himself as Minnesota's answer to Jake Oettinger. It'll be the last years of Jared Spurgeon's (37-38) deal, and Jonas Brodin (32-33) will also be running out of productive years.

    Plus, the Wild should expect a combination of Danila Yurov, Liam Öhgren, Riley Heidt, and Carson Lambos to emerge over the next two seasons. There should be some real (and cheap!) NHL talent in the 2025-26 and 2026-27 seasons.

    That's the Cup window, the time when the team should be ready to take a big swing. Teams that are ready to take the leap into Stanley Cup contention do this all the time. The Chicago Blackhawks and Boston Bruins signed Marian Hossa and Zdeno Chara, respectively, to free-agent deals in the late 2000s that spurred their runs to Cup glory. Or think of the Los Angeles Kings acquiring Jeff Carter and Mike Richards, the Vegas Golden Knights importing Mark Stone and Jack Eichel, or the St. Louis Blues snagging Ryan O'Reilly. You build a team up, then supplement them with elite talent when the time is right.

    Bill Guerin should know this, as he was in the front office of the mid-2010s Pittsburgh Penguins team that swung big for Phil Kessel and won two Cups in large part because of the move. But how do the Wild land their Kessel now?

    Instead of being able to take a big swing, the Wild has put themselves in a position where they've parlayed their golden opportunity into praying that Zuccarello remains a point-per-game player at 38. They're hoping that injuries and hard miles won't continue to wear Foligno down or that Hartman can either remain a top-six caliber player or provide $4 million of value in a checking role. They're also gambling on Gaudreau and Bogosian having productive years left when the rest of the roster is ready to contend.

    The Wild might be able to overcome this, of course. They have high-end talent in Kaprizov, Boldy, and Faber. Their defensive foundation will be strong as long as Spurgeon, Brodin, and Eriksson Ek are healthy. Getting another star or two from Yurov, Rossi, Khusnutdinov, Öhgren, Heidt, or their 2024 draft pick will go a long way to helping. Heck, if Wallstedt is everything prospect gurus think he can be, an elite No. 1 goalie papers over many flaws.

    If they can get a Stanley Cup out of this group, no one's going to care about these extensions. Flags fly forever. But if this group misses their window coming out of the Parise/Suter Dead Cap Era, then never gets close again? That's a different story, one which will lead to fans second-guessing for years why they willingly put themselves into a second, de facto Dead Cap Era.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 2
    • Haha 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    What I’m talking away from your article is the extensions taken as a whole don’t make a lot of sense, especially when considering the Wild’s best SC window. (Projected) From my point of view following the team, and how other teams have built, I agree with your assessment. I keep hoping you’re, I’m, wrong. It’s going to take a few years to see if a couple of “casuals” somehow knew more than a combined NHL organizational brain trust. 

    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I don't think any of these guys cannot be traded.  I'm not sure of the exact restrictions but it isn't really fair to say that the cap is "tied up".  

    The point isn't that we won't have cap space but rather that BG has made it more difficult to make cap space, and hopefully these decisions have been tactical and not just frivolous.

    I will be pissed if we do not swing for the fences via trade or FA for a 1C when the time is right.

    • Like 6
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think Guerin looked at Iowa and determined few (none) of those turnips will evolve into bottom six NHL'rs, so he'll lock in the apathetic old core to man the bottom six over next 3-4 yrs while the prospect cavalry pushes them down the lineups (sooner rather than later please).  Guerin's alternative was to fill out the bottom six with a revolving collection of Tyson Jost's and that possibility didn't sit well with him.  I tend to agree.

    Edited by Pewterschmidt
    • Like 6
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Everything hinges on the new prospects coming in and being as good as anyone they'd get on the free agent market, pushing down the "bad apples" to the 3rd or 4th line roles or out the door (which was probably the plan all along).  If they aren't, that says more about the prospect choices and development, rather than giving money to people like Zuccarello playing PPG quality into his mid-30s.

    But no: everyone signed is a waste of time.  Forgive me if seeing Faber and Rossi being 2nd and 3rd in rookie points doesn't exactly point me to wanting to jump off a cliff and scream just yet.  Boldy and Ek spent this year proving to be great 1st line guys too.  If the new defenseman don't join Faber in quality new additions, sure.  That could be problematic.  Then again, the Bogo/Chisholm tandem have done more than Addison gave us, outside of PP assists.

    It's not all bad, it's not going to be all bad, and I personally think Abbott needs to relax just a bit on the doom and gloom.  He's reminding me of Russo and LaPanta last week.  Russo cried foul for minutes, while LaPanta was trying to make the point that if most of the new guys do what they need to, these extensions will just be people pushed down the roster or let go, rather than blocking people.  If the players aren't good enough to beat out what they re-signed, they aren't good enough, and that's on the players.  It's a low enough bar.

     

    • Like 5
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Great article. Spot on. It’s exactly what worries me. This teams window opens and shuts due to mismanagement of cap . IMO the extended  haven’t done anything in playoffs for us . Why in two years would they be the foundation for a Stanley cup?  Dallas has a core of vets and have won rounds. They seamlessly bring in there prospects. We are asking our prospects to come in and carry most of the vets. 
        Another thing this article points out is due to no flexibility how are they going to bring in size if they aren’t drafting it? Then you’re waiting 5 years.  I don’t like the new look non contact wild. Hitting is part of hockey . They can’t win a cup without physical play . No one on wild hits besides moose. That’s not going to win anything. The wild will get pulverized every playoffs  or they loose there mind. . I’m not talking about fighting. I’m talking about wearing teams down so they make mistakes. It’s like we’re to entitled and good to have to hit. . Or it’s Billy’s idea of new nhl. However hitting still wins cups. . So where do these playoffs type players come from? 
         I thought Vegas was crazy with roster management in the past. I thought they were pissing away future with big swings. However they’ve won a cup. Still have a great roster and added hertl, Hannifin , and Mantha I believe. Plus they still have high picks in future.  I’m starting to think they broke the mold in building. They deal in proven players over development. Let other teams develop and then you buy them to fit what you need now. . I’m sure someday this will catch up to them like Pittsburgh but after how many cups?  I’d take that. 

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    32 minutes ago, Citizen Strife said:

    Everything hinges on the new prospects coming in and being as good as anyone they'd get on the free agent market, pushing down the "bad apples" to the 3rd or 4th line roles or out the door (which was probably the plan all along).  If they aren't, that says more about the prospect choices and development, rather than giving money to people like Zuccarello playing PPG quality into his mid-30s.

    But no: everyone signed is a waste of time.  Forgive me if seeing Faber and Rossi being 2nd and 3rd in rookie points doesn't exactly point me to wanting to jump off a cliff and scream just yet.  Boldy and Ek spent this year proving to be great 1st line guys too.  If the new defenseman don't join Faber in quality new additions, sure.  That could be problematic.  Then again, the Bogo/Chisholm tandem have done more than Addison gave us, outside of PP assists.

    It's not all bad, it's not going to be all bad, and I personally think Abbott needs to relax just a bit on the doom and gloom.  He's reminding me of Russo and LaPanta last week.  Russo cried foul for minutes, while LaPanta was trying to make the point that if most of the new guys do what they need to, these extensions will just be people pushed down the roster or let go, rather than blocking people.  If the players aren't good enough to beat out what they re-signed, they aren't good enough, and that's on the players.  It's a low enough bar.

     

    I think Tony might have a bad tooth….. Better see the Dentist and get it over with.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Note: Guerin's method favors at most 1-2 forward and defenseman prospects at a time, rather than 3-4. Maybe it is a razor thin margin for error, but it isn't as impenetrable as it seems.  The prospects just have to be lights out options.  If the Beckman, Walkers, or Addisons don't feel right, Guerin isn't going to spend roster spots letting them "figure it out."

    Edited by Citizen Strife
    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I would more easily associate "windfall" with teams like Vegas, NY, or Chicago. 

    I would consider MN more like escaping captivity. 

    Foligno, Hartman, and Zuccarello have performed just as we expected. Nobody else was there to displace them.

    Fred and NoJo are both entitled to a bounceback year for me at least. Each guy looked the part when they got signed. Okay with me. After next season, that's gonna have to be re-evaluated.

    Guerin needed to be making small gains and keeping flexibility for when the penalties end. I don't think he's painted himself into a corner on that.

    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, Citizen Strife said:

    Note: Guerin's method favors at most 1-2 forward and defenseman prospects at a time, rather than 3-4. Maybe it is a razor thin margin for error, but it isn't as impenetrable as it seems.  The prospects just have to be lights out options.  If the Beckman, Walkers, or Addisons don't feel right, Guerin isn't going to spend roster spots letting them "figure it out."

    In 41 games with the sharks, Addison has 1g, 9a (5 of which came on PP) and is -20 playing 17:14 a night.  Addison got a pretty long cup of coffee with the big club, and even got an off-season to get his crap together.

    I get that the Sharks are not a good hockey team right now, but moving on from Addison to Bogosian seems to have made this team better.  Maybe I'm missing out on some advanced analytics to show that Addison is actually a better player than Makar, but I don't think Addison helps the point you're trying to make.

    • Like 6
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, Citizen Strife said:

    I'm in favor of Bogo over Addison and stated that in my first post, if that's what you're asking.

    Not specifically, I was just arguing that Addison had a very long leash with a very long cup of coffee with the big club to 'figure it out'

    Maybe it's because Addison was a GuerinGuy® from his time in PIT, but he was given more than a fair shake, especially when you compare him to some of the other guys on that list.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    59 minutes ago, Dean said:

    Vegas

    Good point. At the SC podium VGK players were raving about the addition of their new star 1C JE. The Wild are looking at a 10-12$M 4th line in 3 years. I actually like the players they resigned but I liked the Deweys too. I’m not saying there’s not a plan I’m saying I can’t see it nor have I historically seen it. Vegas had strong, big, physical players sprinkled throughout their lineup which you alluded to. I think that’s a must, therefore I think the Stramel pick was an ok situational choice.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    When I say we haven’t drafted size. I mean in this crop of franchise changing prospects. Stramel may be one hell of a steal or a total bust. Hes obviously got the strength but needs the skill and hockey iq to develop. By that time we’re into our playoff window. He’s not  getting us into it. My point is the d core we drafted years ago is small. The wingers and centers are all small . Starting to draft size now is good but past our window. So then you need to add some size via free agency . However those are extensions make that difficult. You’ll have to move out salary to bring in salary in future. Not so easy with the clauses. 
       As far as trading extended players with nmc and no trade lists is pretty impossible. Definitely impossible to get full value for them. A good agent can make a 15 no trade list basically a no move . So then Billy has to go ask his friends to wave clause. What has Billy done to prove he has the nuts to do that . Even if he did get someone to wave the other teams know that and your value just tanked . Ala tarasenco to Florida from Ottawa. Got nothing basically because vlad chose his destination.
        I think for wild to be successful in competitive rebuild, it comes  down to gm making big swings.. They have to figure out how to buy cap space . Is Billy willing to trade prospects and picks to get us a surrounding cast. I don’t see how he does with his cap management skills. 

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    All I know is the Wild have the 4th oldest team in the NHL and are not going to make the playoffs.  Not a real good combination.  But at least they sell out every game!

    • Haha 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think this is a tad pessimistic.  The Wild don't really have to sign anyone to big money deals except Faber 2025\26 ( and maybe Chisholm) until the 2026\27 season and that is exactly when the NMC's come off for the older players they signed. If they are bad enough that they can't be traded it might hurt, but odds are they can find a team willing to grab them for that money.  Also the cap should go up not stay stagnant and that will help with the raises to Kaprisov and Faber.  Also Spurgeon comes off the books after 2026\27 so that should offset Fabers contract as well.  If they need some extra money earlier than that they could do a buyout with Spurg as well.

    I think Billy thought this through and these signings we all are complaining about aren't "really" in the way.  There is room for young players if they perform and the older guys will be slowly moved out over time. Maybe 25/26 is slightly impacted by the way Billy structured everything, but will have to wait and see. I think we all would liked more flexibility by not having to deal with the NMC's, but it looks like that is what it took for those players to not walk and sign for less.

     

    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, Burnt Toast said:

    I keep hoping you’re, I’m, wrong. It’s going to take a few years to see if a couple of “casuals” somehow knew more than a combined NHL organizational brain trust. 

    It wouldn't be the first time.

    • Thanks 2
    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, Citizen Strife said:

    if most of the new guys do what they need to, these extensions will just be people pushed down the roster or let go

    This^^^ relax everyone.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Where would this team be if they had got Jack Eichel ? Say the Rossi, Öhgren ,stramel pick for him.  I’d do that. I  get the money part  was difficult but that never stops Vegas. 
        Or what if instead of extending foligno , they used that for Ryan o’reilly in free agency this past year? Maroon did his job better for what you’re paying moose , plus getting a legit center. 
        What if we made different cap decisions with goose and fred. Maybe we  could have added some size or used the cap space to acquire picks. 
         What if we had traded Gus instead of extending him. Especially after his lights out season . We could have got talbot as backup till the kid is ready  and had money to play with.  
        I think creative cap decisions is needed to compete and rebuild at same time. Especially during major buyouts. Not handcuffing yourself for no reason . Adding marat and spurg  isn’t going to get you past the heavy central or win any 7 game series . Bill has to get creative or waste a decade. Like the Vikings competitive rebuild went. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    EDM, ANA, NJ, LA, SJS, NYR, BUF, CHI, DET, OTT, CBJ, ARI, MTL, TOR, and the list goes on, all teams that went full rebuild pretty much. None are successful winning the Cup since. Many aren't even close. 

    The Wild aren't in that bad of a spot. 

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Yikes. Tony's gotta take a break for a bit and go for a walk in the sunshine. None of those guys have NMC towards the ends of the deals if I remember correctly. There is LOTS of room for BG to make things happen.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 hours ago, Will D. Ness said:

    I don't think any of these guys cannot be traded.  I'm not sure of the exact restrictions but it isn't really fair to say that the cap is "tied up".  

    The point isn't that we won't have cap space but rather that BG has made it more difficult to make cap space, and hopefully these decisions have been tactical and not just frivolous.

    I will be pissed if we do not swing for the fences via trade or FA for a 1C when the time is right.

    Full no-move clauses for Hartman, Zuccarello, Foligno. 12 million-plus where the team has absolutely no say over whether they can move. What would you rather have? $12 million to throw around, or those three guys two years later into their 30s?

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 hours ago, Citizen Strife said:

    Everything hinges on the new prospects coming in and being as good as anyone they'd get on the free agent market, pushing down the "bad apples" to the 3rd or 4th line roles or out the door (which was probably the plan all along).  If they aren't, that says more about the prospect choices and development, rather than giving money to people like Zuccarello playing PPG quality into his mid-30s.

    But no: everyone signed is a waste of time.  Forgive me if seeing Faber and Rossi being 2nd and 3rd in rookie points doesn't exactly point me to wanting to jump off a cliff and scream just yet.  Boldy and Ek spent this year proving to be great 1st line guys too.  If the new defenseman don't join Faber in quality new additions, sure.  That could be problematic.  Then again, the Bogo/Chisholm tandem have done more than Addison gave us, outside of PP assists.

    It's not all bad, it's not going to be all bad, and I personally think Abbott needs to relax just a bit on the doom and gloom.  He's reminding me of Russo and LaPanta last week.  Russo cried foul for minutes, while LaPanta was trying to make the point that if most of the new guys do what they need to, these extensions will just be people pushed down the roster or let go, rather than blocking people.  If the players aren't good enough to beat out what they re-signed, they aren't good enough, and that's on the players.  It's a low enough bar.

     

    First of all, don't even get me started on how much Lapanta was caping for these signings. 

    Second, this isn't even about the prospects. These extensions might block prospects (how many years was it clear Eriksson Ek was the best center before he got the opportunity?), but I'm talking about the Wild making it nearly impossible to get an impact player to supplement this core. These extensions are blocking the opportunity to add a premier center or defenseman as much as they're blocking any prospects. 

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Patrick said:

    Yikes. Tony's gotta take a break for a bit and go for a walk in the sunshine. None of those guys have NMC towards the ends of the deals if I remember correctly. There is LOTS of room for BG to make things happen.

    Ironclad NMCs through the first year of the post-Dead Cap Era, then heavily protected trade lists in the second. There's very little wiggle room for Guerin, and even if there is, he's shown no willingness to use it with any of "his guys."

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...