Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • Mocking the Minnesota Wild's 2023 Draft


    Image courtesy of Eric Bolte-USA TODAY Sports
    Tony Abbott

     

    Last year on Draft Day, we ran a seven-round mock draft for the Minnesota Wild, pinpointing players we felt could be good fits in St. Paul. We didn't nail down the Liam Öhgren/Danila Yurov first-round duo, but we pegged Servac Petrovsky as a potential pick. The Wild scooped him up in the sixth round, meaning we at least had some idea of what Minnesota might have been looking for in the draft.

    Or it was pure dumb luck. Can we find a player the Wild will take for a second year in a row? We'll find out. Again, we're using the Draft Prospects Hockey draft simulator, which allows us to use Bob McKenzie's rankings. Since McKenzie's rankings are collected from the hockey world, they tend to line up the most with the actual draft order. We've also turned the randomness factor up slightly, though not as much as we did Monday, when we took a look at best-case scenarios.

    With that all out of the way, let's go. One simulation. No do-overs, no trade-ups. We run the draft once and let the chips fall where they may.

    Round 1, Pick 21

    It's not ideal to gun for one position in the NHL Draft, but if you're going to do it, looking for the "Best Available Center" is probably the way to go. The Dallas Stars ousted the Wild in the playoffs last year partially because of their options down the middle. When Joe Pavelski left with injury, the Stars backfilled with Roope Hintz and Tyler Seguin, with Jamie Benn, Wyatt Johnston, and Radek Faska able to play the pivot as well.

    Centers create options, so it's a good idea for Minnesota to focus on them, particularly when they've been rolling with Ryan Hartman and Freddy Gaudreau in their top-9. Unfortunately, a lot of our best-case centers are gone already. Oliver Moore went at 12th overall, followed by Brayden Yager at 16th. Also gone are Calum Ritchie and Otto Stenberg. McKenzie's best available player is a center, however, as 16th-ranked Nate Danielson is still available.

    The Pick: Samuel Honzek, LW, Vancouver Giants (WHL)

    We considered Danielson, a great skater, in this spot. Also, we had our eye on defenseman Mikhail Gulyayev and power winger Quentin Musty here, as well. In the end, we passed on them all to take Honzek for the upside potential. The plan is to convert the 6'3" winger to center full-time, feeling a strong belief that his good skating, great playmaking, and strong two-way play will translate to the role. 

    We're already impressed with his 1.30 points per game as a WHL rookie, but he was trending even better before his calf got cut at the World Junior Championships. Before the injury, he scored 43 points in 31 games (1.39 per game), which would have put him at 17th in the WHL, in the range of top prospects like 2021 ninth-overall pick Dylan Guenther (1.45) and 2022 first-rounder Brad Lambert (1.46). Honzek feels like both a safe pick and a home-run swing.

    Round 2, Pick 53

    The plan initially was to grab a second center with this pick, but the board didn't cooperate with us. Gracyn Sawchyn -- who we pegged as a best-case scenario for this spot -- went at Pick 44. Oscar Fisker Mølgaard went with the following pick, and Riley Heidt and Charlie Stramel also went off the board. McKenzie's top players remaining were Jakub Dvorak (43), a physical 6'5" defenseman and Finnish winger Jesse Kiiskanen (48).

    The Pick: Nick Lardis, LW, Hamilton Bulldogs (OHL)

    We mentioned Dallas' Hintz a bit earlier, so who better to target with this pick than the player that reminds Elite Prospects of "Smaller Roope Hintz?" Nick Lardis exploded in the second half of last season after being traded to Hamilton, scoring 25 goals and 46 points in 33 games. That 1.39 per-game average would have put him somewhere between Musty (1.47) and Colby Barlow (1.34), both sure-fire first-rounders.

    Lardis has wheels, with McKeen's Hockey calling him the second-fastest skater in the draft, and the seventh-best skater overall. And then there's his shot. Elite Prospects says of it, "No matter where the puck arrives, Lardis finds ways to slam it in the net. He can do so while sliding backward, rushing ahead, with his feet pointed away from the target, and with instant catch-and-release motions." Sounds a bit like Jason Zucker, and we'd be thrilled to get that in the second round.

    Round 2, Pick 64

    We started eyeing defense in this spot, but there are two major issues with going for a defenseman. One, the top talents are more or less off the board, and there weren't that many big names to begin with. The next problem is that the Wild don't really need to grab a defenseman for their system unless they've got top-pair potential. So it's back to another swing at a forward.

    The Pick: Roman Kantserov, RW, Magnitogorsk (MHL)

    Call us a sucker for players with superficial comparisons to Kirill Kaprizov, but who could blame us? Those similarities go beyond them both being 5'9" Russian wingers, their games have some eerie parallels. The Athletic's Scott Wheeler describes him as "A Knifing player who possesses one of the better releases in the draft and pairs it with quick, adjustable hands, borderline dynamic one-on-one skill, and an attack mentality."

    FC Hockey points out something that screams "Kaprizov-Lite!" even louder. "Kantserov effectively uses his body and showcases strong mobility and edgework, allowing him to quickly pivot away from checks... and set up deceptive passing plays." We know that Judd Brackett isn't afraid to grab talented Russians, and neither are we. With this being Minnesota's third pick of this draft, Kantserov is a smart use of house money.

    Which is good that we made hay while the sun was shining, because it's going to be a long 85 picks until the next pick at 149. Given the top names will all be off the board, our strategy is now to just look for players with interesting statistical profiles that are left over.

    Round 5, Pick 149: Frantisek Dej, C, HC Modre Kridla Slovan (Slovakia2)

    This pick is betting hard on two things. The first is the fact that it's hard to find a 6'4" center in the fifth round of the Draft. There has to be warts in a player's game to have that as the headline of your resume and to fall that far, and that's the case for Dej. Scouts don't think much of his skill set past his size, physicality, and skating. 

    Still, none of that stopped him from putting up 21 points in 24 games against men in Slovakia's second league. It's the second Slovakian league, but being top-40 in points per game against men has to count for something, no? Dej is the pick, and even if he goes on to just be the Next Nico Sturm, that's A-OK.

    Round 6, Pick 181: Gavyn Thoreson, RW, Andover (MN High)

    Call this a bog-standard "One of Us" pick to pander to the hometown fans all you want. The former (Andover) Husky and future (St. Cloud State) Husky might surprise and prove himself to be more than a crowd-pleasing footnote.

    Being listed at 5'8" is going to make Thoreson a hard "nope" for some teams. They might be right, and he might be too small to make it. If Thoreson has anything to say about it, though, he won't be stopped. Thoreson is one of those short players who doesn't translate to being as small as you'd think. Weighing 183 pounds, he's pretty stout and strong for his size.

    Mitchell Brown of Elite Prospects marvels at length over Thoreson's strength in getting to the dirty areas, but it can just be summed up with "What a tank." McKeen's Hockey notes: "Even in the USHL, he was throwing the body and finding his way to the net." The USHL, by the way, was where he racked up 23 points in 23 games while showing proficiency in all three zones, proving that he has skills to match his motor. That's worth a flier in the sixth round.

    Round 7, Pick 213: Nikita Ishimnikov, D, Avto Yekaterinburg (MHL)

    Wow, seven rounds have passed, and we're only drafting our first defenseman? We'd better make it count, then. How about making another bet on a player who combines size and production in Ishimnikov?

    For folks who want more size on the blueline, Ishimnikov's 6'3" frame brings at least a potential solution for that need. Though, he's known much more for being an offensive defenseman, with a big shot and aggressive approach being his calling cards. His skating is the biggest knock on him, and that can be the kiss of death for an NHL prospect, particularly one who presumably won't have Minnesota's coaches getting their hands on him anytime soon. But for a seventh-round pick, I figure I can do worse than a 6'3" defenseman whose 11 goals tied for third at his position in the MHL.

    Now, how will things actually play out? We'll know, starting in a few hours.

     

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Perrault stats (playing against other 5’8”-6’rs) are clearly better than stramel but if this team with zuc/97/grizzle/Dewzy/SHAWZY/Rossi/Addison/spurgeon/mojo/Fred…wants to stop getting bullied in playoffs we need to add some beef.  
    #where’sthebeef 

    #pleasedon’tbeJamesShepard

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    24 minutes ago, jgodwin17 said:

    Also worth noting that Stramel’s stock fell because a bad freshman year, another player who had that happen was Matt Boldy, and he turned out okay. Whether Stramel can pull that off who knows though. 

    Boldy scored nearly a point per game (26 in 33) his freshman year and was a +16.

    Stramel had what, 7-8 points in 33 games?

    I know, different teams, different conferences, etc.  but Stramel had a whole different level of down freshman year than Boldy.

    Might end up being a great pick.  He was highly touted at one time.  But, I’d have gone with a few different guys there.

    Also stings a little to see Chicago and St. Louis absolutely loading up.  I would’ve even preferred Colorado’s pick of Ritchie over Stamel.  That was a tough first round to watch.

     

     

     

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, Beast said:

    Boldy scored nearly a point per game (26 in 33) his freshman year and was a +16.

    Stramel had what, 7-8 points in 33 games?

    I know, different teams, different conferences, etc.  but Stramel had a whole different level of down freshman year than Boldy.

    Might end up being a great pick.  He was highly touted at one time.  But, I’d have gone with a few different guys there.

    Also stings a little to see Chicago and St. Louis absolutely loading up.  I would’ve even preferred Colorado’s pick of Ritchie over Stamel.  That was a tough first round to watch.

     

     

     

    I think he had 12 points and was a -10 (not sure how much that means considering I think the entire team was in the negatives), and as you mentioned, tougher competition and much worse team in a much easier role. I'm just saying there is potential for him to turn out.

    But overall I agree with you. I'm pretty unhappy with this draft round. It sucks watching Moore drop to 19 and Chicago grabbing him when we probably could have traded up a few spots and grabbed him. It also sucks that we could have grabbed Ritchie, Stenburg, or Musty, and went for Stramel instead. Really puzzling decision. I kind of understand it in the need for right handed shots and power forwards, but I still feel it's a huge stretch.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Supposedly Pronman said Stramel wouldn’t make it past the Rangers but still a bit of a puzzling pick.

    Ritchie had a dislocated shoulder the entire year and still put up a point per game pace on bad team.

    I hate the Aves.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, Mateo3xm said:

    Supposedly Pronman said Stramel wouldn’t make it past the Rangers but still a bit of a puzzling pick.

    Ritchie had a dislocated shoulder the entire year and still put up a point per game pace on bad team.

    I hate the Aves.

    I assume the big 10 is better hockey than ohl so stats might be apple’s vs oranges.  True?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    I assume the big 10 is better hockey than ohl so stats might be apple’s vs oranges.  

    Yeah tough to compare the two we will see what happens.

    I hope I’m wrong about Stramel and he ends up like Dylan Holloway from Wis and has a great 2nd year.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 hours ago, Quebec1648 said:

    The Wild just gambled on a pick, when there were better choices still on the board. Stenburg, Musty and Ritche were available, yet the Wild chose Stramel? Stramel would have been there in round 2, no need to take him in round 1. 

    No. He wouldn't have. Some other team would've taken him at the back of round 1, or he'd have gotten scooped up in round 2 quickly.

    No chance he made it to #53. 

    At worst, he's a future Ek replacement on a shutdown 3rd line. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 hours ago, Mateo3xm said:

    Supposedly Pronman said Stramel wouldn’t make it past the Rangers but still a bit of a puzzling pick.

    Ritchie had a dislocated shoulder the entire year and still put up a point per game pace on bad team.

    I hate the Aves.

    Not that puzzling. We need more size and we need Cs. Stramel is both. 

    He would not have made it to us in round 2, so we took him in round 1. He's got a lower ceiling than other guys who were available but also a much higher floor, which should allow him to hit the NHL more quickly even if its just in a bottom-6 role.

    At least he fits that profile better than Rossi, Dean Evason is gonna love this guy. 

     

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Agreed. Stramel, Edstrom, Molgaard, Cristall, and some other guys who play center will not be around by 53rd.

    I could see the Wild trying to trade up perhaps, but the Wild's position in the pick order was gonna force them to decide whether to take a player like Perreault who woulda been considered the BPA at that moment or grab the guy they needed from the top remaining group. Stramel will have some good coaches and objectives so polishing his rough edges will be a great plan for the next year. It's not like he needs to add NHL size/strength. I like the pick. It's the anti-Rossi reaction draft. I believe one large, tough Minnesota guy can compensate for little Euro finesse'rs...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 hours ago, jgodwin17 said:

     I kind of understand it in the need for right handed shots and power forwards, but I still feel it's a huge stretch.

    I'm a diehard ' you gotta take the best player available in the first round' kind a guy. This was a reach and certainly wasn't the best available. What a disappointment.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    ^^^

    You wanna talk about a reach, look at Toronto. Cowan at 28th.

    Goes to show teams have their own evaluations and lists that might not align at all with writers, scouts, and fans. So who is right? For the sake of argument, I'd say the teams must be confident in their picks for a reason.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Wild took Stramel because of his size. In their defense, those guys are hard to come by, but besides size they also need talent. 

    A lot has been said about WI. having a bad team this year. Well, great players standout, great players make their teammates and teams better. 

    That being said, he's young and can develop, I'm sure they see something and hopefully their right but the track record so far isn't their favor.

    • Like 1
    • Confused 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, Protec said:

    Agreed. Stramel, Edstrom, Molgaard, Cristall, and some other guys who play center will not be around by 53rd.

    I'm not opposed to Stramel being added to the Wild, but I wouldn't be surprised if Edstrom is better, so using the pick they did to acquire him seemed mildly questionable.  I hope the Wild got it right, but I would have liked the selection better if they acquired him after trading back late in the 1st and picking up more draft picks. I would have preferred trading back later in the 1st if any value was being offered to do so, whether in this draft or the next.

    You can read reasons why Stramel could succeed, and the size is nice, but it's not hard to also see reasons why he might have lasted until the range of #32-#40.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    For the guys talking about the Wild moving up for Moore (which I would really have liked), it doesn't look like any of the teams are moving around. It takes two to tango, so maybe there wasn't a path without grossly overpaying.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Yeah, I noticed there was a significant value on picks for the organizations in this draft.

    Ideas are great to fire out there but I don't see the Wild doing too much crazy stuff. Their current assets they could move who are NHL ready aren't top tier guys. Ahead of free agency we saw some action, but will that continue?

    I would think teams are gonna regroup now that the draft is complete and look at ahead to UFA signings and begin working new deals up or picking up where things might have left off. The nice thing is the Wild aren't in any kind of urgent or forced situation. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...