Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • Marco Rossi's Contract Won't Silence the Trade Whispers


    Image courtesy of James Guillory - Imagn Images
    Chris Schad

    Minnesota Wild fans expected “Christmas Morning” this summer, but what they got was “The Battle of Marco Rossi.” The young center’s future had been a hot topic throughout the 2024-25 season, and it appeared that a trade was likely when John Hynes dropped him to the fourth line during last spring’s playoff series with the Vegas Golden Knights.

    While Wild fans braced for impact while up north at the cabin, the blockbuster move never materialized. Guerin wanted more than what opposing teams may have been offering, and in the end, the two sides reached an agreement on a three-year, $15 million contract that kicks the problem down the road.

    In a perfect world, the Wild would give Rossi the chance to prove himself this winter and go back to the negotiating table in two or three years. However, Rossi’s new contract only fuels the trade whispers and raises the prospect of a departure that may be more imminent than initially thought at the beginning of the summer.

    It starts with Rossi’s profile. After working on his game in the AHL for two seasons, Rossi became a full-time player in 2023-24 and posted 21 goals and 40 points. He took another step this past season, scoring 24 goals and 60 points and becoming, at least in his eyes, a top-six center.

    Set to turn 24 next month, it’s hard to disagree. Rossi finished second on the Wild in scoring and saw his ice time jump to 18:15 in the regular season. He also improved on his faceoff success rate, going from 44.7% in 2023-24 to 46.8% last season. If Rossi continues to improve, he should be in line to cash in near the end of this deal, but that discussion became complicated.

    Rossi is a good player, but is he a good player on a legitimate playoff contender? Wild fans seem to think so, especially when they focus on how Rossi started the year. The Wild went 25-11-4 in their first 40 games, and Rossi was a key contributor during that time. He scored 15 goals and 37 points in that stretch, and things were looking great... until you noticed the 21.1% shooting percentage.

    Sure enough, Rossi began to regress. Part of it can be blamed on the wave of injuries that left the Wild playing shorthanded until the final weeks of the regular season. But Rossi was never one of the guys to step up. After a four-point game against the Carolina Hurricanes on Jan. 4, he managed just nine goals and 23 points in the final 42 games, with his shooting percentage dropping to 13.8% and his faceoff win percentage dropping from 49% to 44.6% down the stretch.

    Rossi's 5-foot-9, 182 lbs. was seen as the reason Guerin offered just a five-year, $25 million extension last season. But Rossi's second-half slump might have given Guerin more reason for pause than Rossi's shorter stature. 

    Guerin was adamant that he wasn’t going to make the team worse this offseason just to make a move in the summer. Keeping Rossi in the fold is an excellent idea in the short term, but it was a move that simply had to happen after no team made a credible offer in a trade or RFA contract. If a team really wanted Rossi, they probably could have just ponied up with an offer sheet worth $7 million and sent the first- and third-round picks to Minnesota. But the rest of the league saw what Guerin did.

    That means the new extension is the best of both worlds. Rossi can return to Minnesota and try to prove that he’s the player we saw in the first half of last season. If he does that, the Wild could look to keep him, or they could seek to sell high and bring him to the trade market as soon as the 2026 deadline.

    Consider Martin Necas' situation a few years ago. Stuck in a similar standoff with the Hurricanes after scoring 28 goals with 71 points in his age-24 season (2022-23), Necas had a similar standoff with Carolina before signing a two-year, $6 million bridge deal. Necas regressed to score 24 times with 53 goals in the first season of that deal, but the Canes were able to pounce after he scored 16 goals and 55 points in the first 49 games of the 2024-25 season, sending him to the Colorado Avalanche in their first Mikko Rantanen trade.

    If Rossi comes out of the gates blazing next season, teams that weren’t in on him this summer before could be more interested. He’s 24, on a cheap deal, and under team control for two more seasons. That could also be a way for the Wild to wring more value out of Rossi, paving the way for the big move that was promised, but never delivered upon this summer.

    Put it together, and this contract feels like a band-aid over a fractured relationship. Rossi may be a member of the Wild heading into the upcoming season. Still, if there was any truth to the trade rumors from this summer, the odds of him lasting the entire contract remain slim.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 3

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Guerin's moves suggest that if someone of high enough value comes on the market, the Wild can make offers.  If Rossi has to be part of that package, it depends on the stature of said player and whether or not it is a no-brainer move.

    In the meantime, Rossi and others can develop and maybe be those immovable impact players themselves.  Having options has been a foreign concept for Wild GMs.

    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I still think a Rossi trade is coming sometime this season and think it might be with PITT, BUF, DET or NYI as part of a bigger trade.  I could see Rossi, Zeev or Faber, a first and something going to PITT for Rakell and Crosby if Crosby wants to move or it would just be Rakell.  I think this trade deadline will be very big and we could see big shakeups with Rossi, spurgeon, Brodin all parts of deals.  Watch out for Barzal and Lee from the islanders.  I am guessing with this new contract Billy’s phone will be active with teams looking to improve.  In Billy’s press conference he said yes Rossi he sees as a top 6 forward but if or anyone doesn’t perform we have to look at adjusting or making other changes.  I still think a much bigger move is coming sometime this year not just with Rossi but a few other guys.  Abd please Billy don’t handcuff this team paying Kap over $13mm.  If he wants more let’s trade him. 

    • Like 1
    • Confused 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Great move for the Wild.....and lots of options in the future with Rossi, depending on his play and stats. 

    To me, Rossi is a 3rd line center in the Western Conference, especially in the Central.  But can definitely play 2nd line minutes when needed in the regular season.  Come playoffs, definitely only a 3rd line C.

    But I believe Rossi is a 2nd line C in the Eastern Conference, in either the regular season or playoffs. 

    In my opinion, an Eastern Conference team will make a move for him at some point this year.

    All just my opinion of course🤘

    *And I like Rossi's game, he just needs to be more physical.  So, needs to get a nutritionist and a strength coach💪

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, mnhockeyfan03 said:

    I still think a Rossi trade is coming sometime this season and think it might be with PITT, BUF, DET or NYI as part of a bigger trade.  I could see Rossi, Zeev or Faber, a first and something going to PITT for Rakell and Crosby if Crosby wants to move or it would just be Rakell.  I think this trade deadline will be very big and we could see big shakeups with Rossi, spurgeon, Brodin all parts of deals.  Watch out for Barzal and Lee from the islanders.  I am guessing with this new contract Billy’s phone will be active with teams looking to improve.  In Billy’s press conference he said yes Rossi he sees as a top 6 forward but if or anyone doesn’t perform we have to look at adjusting or making other changes.  I still think a much bigger move is coming sometime this year not just with Rossi but a few other guys.  Abd please Billy don’t handcuff this team paying Kap over $13mm.  If he wants more let’s trade him. 

    None of that for Crosby, unless you can magically de-age him 10 years.

    You want to even trade Kap now?  Sheesh.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, mnhockeyfan03 said:

    $13mm

    That would beat Rossi’s signing for team friendly. I’ve heard as high as $18M AAV. I’m thinking closer to $15. Unless the Wild want to reset their “window” they’ll need to Stop Drop and Roll out the cash. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    56 minutes ago, Citizen Strife said:

    None of that for Crosby, unless you can magically de-age him 10 years.

    You want to even trade Kap now?  Sheesh.

    If Kap wants more than $13mm he has to understand he is only hurting the team and we won’t win the cup if he is making 15-16. Find commercials for him to fill in the rest. So yes if he wants more than $13mm I see what I can get for him. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    52 minutes ago, Burnt Toast said:

    That would beat Rossi’s signing for team friendly. I’ve heard as high as $18M AAV. I’m thinking closer to $15. Unless the Wild want to reset their “window” they’ll need to Stop Drop and Roll out the cash. 

    No player besides mcdavid and McKinnon are worth that.  Sorry but Kap cannot control and take over the game like they can.  Kaps comp is rantanen who just signed for $12mm in Texas so in MN taxes it’s $13mm

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    You're forgetting the important thing here: Kap is the unequivocal best player the Wild have ever had.  If he (or more likely his agent) says it takes $14m, $15m, $16m, the Wild kinda have to.de 

    Minnesota can't buy free agent or trade luck.  It happened once in 25 years with two players a tier below his talent level.  Yes, you can say "Well Kap hasn't won shit either.". But if Kap won't stay for any price, you want to take your chances convincing any other Top 10 talent to show up instead?

    Edited by Citizen Strife
    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, Citizen Strife said:

    You're forgetting the important thing here: Kap is the unequivocal best player the Wild have ever had.  If he (or more likely his agent) says it takes $14m, $15m, $16m, the Wild kinda have to.de 

    Minnesota can't buy free agent or trade luck.  It happened once in 25 years.  Yes, you can say "Well Kap hasn't won shit either.". But if Kap won't stay for any price, you want to take your chances convincing any other Top 10 talent to show up instead?

    Understand but he is still hurt a lot and only getting older.  I will take 2 really good players at $7-8mm each than 1 player in Kap at 14-15.  It’s a team.  I say do 3-4yrs at $13mm or trade him to the highest bidder who he wants to go to.  If we pay 14-16mm this team is screwed.  In my opinion no player should be making over $10mm in this league to build out a deeeep team.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    18 hours ago, mnhockeyfan03 said:

    No player besides mcdavid and McKinnon are worth that.

    On ice analytics probably confirm that across the entire NHL. What has developed here in MN with KK has additional factors. #1 OCL lucked into a player that draws attendance no matter how the team performs. Value added. #2 KK has basically got a bunch of players either extended careers or stats beyond their expected averages. Value added. #3 What does the current GM’s resume look like over the last 6 years without a KK? #4 CJH What is the chance he breaks the narrative that he can’t win a playoff series in the NHL without KK? That’s why I say if KK goes $15M it’s team friendly because if he and his agent want to play hardball it’s going to be even higher. The one factor I don’t have any idea about is if KK is willing to sacrifice some personal AAV to help with team building. You mentioned Nathan McK. The year they won the cup he was making around $6M. Crosby has also left some $ on the table and it paid off. Florida across the board seems to have drawn players that fit that mold. I’m hoping for the $13M you suggested while I’m preparing for a number a bit higher. 

    Edited by Burnt Toast
    Spelling
    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    18 hours ago, mnhockeyfan03 said:

    Understand but he is still hurt a lot and only getting older.  I will take 2 really good players at $7-8mm each than 1 player in Kap at 14-15.  It’s a team.  I say do 3-4yrs at $13mm or trade him to the highest bidder who he wants to go to.  If we pay 14-16mm this team is screwed.  In my opinion no player should be making over $10mm in this league to build out a deeeep team.  

    I fail to see where you intend to get these magical $7-$8M really good players. How many did you see change teams this year? It will get even tougher next year as teams will see in advance how much they need to have in cap space.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Billy has to do a good job of selling Kap on taking a lower amount to build a complete team and a 3x$13mm deal allows him to do that.  It also allows Kap to cash in again.  If he wants more we can find other suitors and could get multiple impact players back.  This is a team game and no team with high paid stars in the 12-15mm range have won the cup.  Take less to build a team.  Don’t be selfish.  Take 11-12mm and the owner and city can find other ways to get you 3-4mm through endorsements.  Think outside the box. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    22 hours ago, Paup said:

    *And I like Rossi's game, he just needs to be more physical.  So, needs to get a nutritionist and a strength coach💪

    Rossi's now 5'9", 196 lbs. per his recent interview in Austria.  Kaprizov is a whole inch taller and six pounds heavier. I'm more than willing to see how Rossi uses that new muscle in the high-danger areas before I parrot the "too soft" line. 

    • Like 4
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    59 minutes ago, bisopher said:

    Rossi's now 5'9", 196 lbs. per his recent interview in Austria.  Kaprizov is a whole inch taller and six pounds heavier. I'm more than willing to see how Rossi uses that new muscle in the high-danger areas before I parrot the "too soft" line. 

    I personally think Rossi moves very well in and out of high danger areas.  He's just not able to stay put in front and be an effective screen.  My demerit for his physical play is I want him to punish the other guy who beats him to the puck.  Cause if you know that kind of hit is never coming, as an opposing player, you can chase that puck a little harder knowing Rossi is more than likely gonna only use his stick to remove you from the puck. Which is alright during the regular season, but come playoffs, that won't fly. 

    It's gotta be a challenge being asked to do something you've never really been known for.  But it's the central.  So, I'm glad to hear he's put on some weight. 

    I know Boldys game isn't physical either, but he's got the size to withstand hits and can give em out every so often. If Boldy could add a little sandpaper to his game, ala Erickson EK, that f*kin guy would be a beast. 

    *My take on Kaprisov is BG and the Wild will do 8x14.5

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Rossi will be a trade chip for his entire year until he isn't valuable.  The Wild got a good deal on him for the next three years.  Even if he plays terrible the contract is still going to look good with the Cap going up.  Now if he plays fantastic he will want more money when he becomes a Free Agent and the Wild will probably not have any money to sign him to a larger contract.  Which necessarily won't be a bad thing. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 8/23/2025 at 3:04 PM, mnhockeyfan03 said:

    Abd please Billy don’t handcuff this team paying Kap over $13mm.  If he wants more let’s trade him. 

    You do realize that Kaprizov has an NMC and gets to decide where he would go, right? That would significantly eliminate most of the pool of teams bidding for him and we would not like the value we got.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    58 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    You do realize that Kaprizov has an NMC and gets to decide where he would go, right? That would significantly eliminate most of the pool of teams bidding for him and we would not like the value we got.

    Yes do know that and we can still get enough return.  No need to pay him $14-16mm.  No player besides mcdavid or McKinnon are worth that.  If he gets over $13mm we won’t be winning a cup here.  Just the facts.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    20 hours ago, Up North Guy said:

    I fail to see where you intend to get these magical $7-$8M really good players. How many did you see change teams this year? It will get even tougher next year as teams will see in advance how much they need to have in cap space.

    It's called a trade. The Wild could easily get two solid top six forwards for Kaprizov, and then some. I bet Buffalo would trade Thompson and Tuch for Kaprizov (just an example). Would that make the Wild better? I don't know, it would be a totally different team. One thing they wouldn't lack is size.

    Of course, Kaprizov would never accept a trade to Buffalo, it's just a hypothetical.

    I'm with mnhockeyfan on this one. Kaprizov isn't enough to win a cup by himself and if they overpay him, they will never have enough cap to build a championship team (Billy's genius management skills don't help). So, again, it boils down to whether Kaprizov wants money or his name on the cup. Don't be surprised if he doesn't sign a new contract before the season starts. He could easily drag this out until next summer or force the Wild's hand at the trade deadline, depending on how the team is doing. That's what I would do. Why box yourself in before you have all of the information or before you have to.

    Pretty sure McDavid is pondering the same thing. If he re-signs with the Oilers, they will never have enough cap to build a cup team after this season. It's this year or bust for the Oilers. Why would he sign now when he can wait to see if they win the cup this season. If they do, he may be content just coasting the rest of his career for cash. If they don't win, he can sign with a team that still has a chance.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 minutes ago, Scalptrash said:

    Kaprizov isn't enough to win a cup by himself and if they overpay him, they will never have enough cap to build a championship team (Billy's genius management skills don't help). So, again, it boils down to whether Kaprizov wants money or his name on the cup. 

    You realize the salary cap is increasing from $95.5 to $113.5M, that's $18M over the next two years, and a player like Kaprizov isn't worth over $13M?  He's easily getting $14-15M, it just depends on if he wants a short or long term deal with the Wild. 

    The Wild have never had the opportunity to draft high enough to get a player like Kaprizov, he's essentially a first overall pick.  McDavid is probably getting $16-17M, which sounds like crazy money, but not when it's compared to the NFL, MLB, and NBA, obviously there are other factors involved.  Now, compared to other NHL teams, it's probably not wise to be too top heavy with huge contracts to 3-4 players, such as TOR, EDM, COL, etc., but I don't foresee the Wild having that problem anytime soon. 

    At this point, the Wild and fans absolutely deserve to have one star player that can put up over a point per game, and maybe someday win an individual award also, and help us get past the first round of the playoffs after 25 years of mediocrity.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    39 minutes ago, 0 Stanley Cups said:

    You realize the salary cap is increasing from $95.5 to $113.5M, that's $18M over the next two years, and a player like Kaprizov isn't worth over $13M?  He's easily getting $14-15M, it just depends on if he wants a short or long term deal with the Wild. 

    The Wild have never had the opportunity to draft high enough to get a player like Kaprizov, he's essentially a first overall pick.  McDavid is probably getting $16-17M, which sounds like crazy money, but not when it's compared to the NFL, MLB, and NBA, obviously there are other factors involved.  Now, compared to other NHL teams, it's probably not wise to be too top heavy with huge contracts to 3-4 players, such as TOR, EDM, COL, etc., but I don't foresee the Wild having that problem anytime soon. 

    At this point, the Wild and fans absolutely deserve to have one star player that can put up over a point per game, and maybe someday win an individual award also, and help us get past the first round of the playoffs after 25 years of mediocrity.

    Yes, fully aware. Do you think player salaries are going to remain stagnant? A player that costs $7M today, will cost $9-10M in two years. The cap may be going up a lot, but so will the contracts (and ticket prices), it's all relative. Also, my point was what should Kaprizov do now, not what the Wild should give him. They will give him whatever it takes. The question is, does he want money or his name on the cup? He can't have both in MN.

    So he should only sign a two year deal for $15M, right? Then when the Wild have $18M more in cap space, he can re-sign for $20M x 7 years.

    This year Kaprizov and Gustavsson account for almost $14M. Next year they will probably account for $22M. That's $8M more just for the two of them.

    They have approximately $5M in cap space now and it's going up to $104M next season. So that's half of that extra cap for just two players. They will also have to replace Zuccarello and Johansson next year and that should be the "Christmas morning" player they promised at around $7-8M. That's not a wish list, that's what Kaprizov will require and what he will be promised for sticking around. There's your other half. That leaves about $9M in new cap space the next year to re-sign Spurgeon, Buium, Hartman, Sturm and Ohgren or their replacements.

    Point is, it's all relative. That's why it was so important to low ball Rossi, they are going to need it.

    P.S. Whatever player they trade Rossi for is going to cost more than $6M. That will happen this year.

    Edited by Scalptrash
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Scalptrash said:

    That leaves about $9M in new cap space the next year to re-sign Spurgeon, Buium, Hartman, Sturm and Ohgren or their replacements.

    Don't have time to reply to all of this so I will just focus on one part.

    It does not leave $9M.  If those players need to be re-signed, then the money they are making now will also be freed up, increasing that number to something more along the lines of $24-25M.  That, and Spurgeon, if re-signed, would likely sign for less than he's getting now.  He wouldn't be making what he is now.

    $15M for Kaprizov isn't going to hurt the team much more than $13M will.  All the ELCs will carry the Wild through the tightest part of that, and as the cap increases, there will be room to re-sign the younger players who are going to cost more to keep.

    Despite saying that you recognize that the cap is going up, you still apply reasoning relative to the cap being stagnant.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, raithis said:

    Don't have time to reply to all of this so I will just focus on one part.

    It does not leave $9M.  If those players need to be re-signed, then the money they are making now will also be freed up, increasing that number to something more along the lines of $24-25M.  That, and Spurgeon, if re-signed, would likely sign for less than he's getting now.  He wouldn't be making what he is now.

    $15M for Kaprizov isn't going to hurt the team much more than $13M will.  All the ELCs will carry the Wild through the tightest part of that, and as the cap increases, there will be room to re-sign the younger players who are going to cost more to keep.

    Despite saying that you recognize that the cap is going up, you still apply reasoning relative to the cap being stagnant.

    Once again why does everyone want to keep running the same guys back.  We need more top 6 forwards.  If cap signs for less that allows us to get another top 6 forward or 2.  Sorry but Zuc, Rossi and Terasenko are not top 6 guys on a contending team.  Is this fan base just happy to be decent or want a really chance of getting a cup.  If it’s a cup then we need more money for top 6 guys and guys like Spurg and Brodin will be gone along with Rossi, Zuc and Terasenko 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, raithis said:

    Don't have time to reply to all of this so I will just focus on one part.

    It does not leave $9M.  If those players need to be re-signed, then the money they are making now will also be freed up, increasing that number to something more along the lines of $24-25M.  That, and Spurgeon, if re-signed, would likely sign for less than he's getting now.  He wouldn't be making what he is now.

    $15M for Kaprizov isn't going to hurt the team much more than $13M will.  All the ELCs will carry the Wild through the tightest part of that, and as the cap increases, there will be room to re-sign the younger players who are going to cost more to keep.

    Despite saying that you recognize that the cap is going up, you still apply reasoning relative to the cap being stagnant.

    Yes, you're correct, I meant in new cap space.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...