Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • Aron Kiviharju’s Outlook Becoming Clearer After Strong World Juniors


    Image courtesy of Nick Wosika-Imagn Images
    Neil Urbanski

    Aron Kiviharju, a 2024 fourth-round draft pick of the Minnesota Wild, was in the Twin Cities for the past few weeks as he captained Team Finland to a third consecutive appearance in the medal round. 

    It was Kiviharju’s second year as captain of the Finnish squad. While they were disappointed with their fourth-place finish after falling to Canada in the bronze medal game, it was another excellent performance by the 5-foot-10 defenseman. He was once again voted as one of Finland’s three best players after also receiving that honor in last year’s tournament.

    Kiviharju, who famously told Bill Guerin that the Wild “got the steal of the draft” after a serious knee injury in his draft year caused him to slide down draft boards, led Finland in ice time with 23:03 per game, which was also the fifth most by any player in the tournament. 

    He was the most important player on a team lacking star power, which became crystal clear when he missed Finland’s preliminary round matchup against Canada. In the six games that Kiviharju played, Finland allowed an average of 2.83 goals against. In that New Year’s Eve tilt versus Canada, they allowed seven.

    It wasn’t just that the usually stout Finns got lit up; it was how it happened that was the most striking. All night, they looked disorganized on the back end, mixing up coverages, missing switches, and botching sort-outs when defending in transition. They were pushed around in front of the net, and several of Canada’s goals came on defensive breakdowns. Zone clears under pressure were an issue. There was even a five- or ten-second window at the tail end of a power play when they played with only four skaters after a mix-up that left them one defenseman short.

    It was clear from the get-go that they dearly missed their captain. Watching Kiviharju defend is like watching a good floor general in basketball. He directs traffic, calls out switches, supports teammates, and takes away options. 

    Kiviharju is versatile. He can play both sides and often does, meaning the lefty can be mixed and matched with partners based on game situations and matchup preferences. And when he gets the puck on his stick, the game calms down, and he handles it with poise. Kiviharju rarely makes a bad decision, and he’s excellent at relieving pressure with deft maneuvers into space or short passes against the grain that evade forechecks.

    Perhaps most importantly, he plays big minutes. In Finland’s epic semi-final game against eventual gold-medalist Sweden, a thriller that ended in a 4-3 shootout decision for the Swedes, Kiviharju played a whopping 27:28, including 5:08 of the 10-minute three-on-three overtime. His ice time was nearly seven minutes more than the next highest total for a Finnish defenseman. 

    Kiviharju was on the ice for all three of Finland’s goals and only one goal against. He assisted on Finland’s first goal and nearly ended the game in overtime, ringing the crossbar from the high slot. It was a phenomenal performance in the biggest of moments. It came two days after overcoming illness and playing a stellar game in a quarterfinal victory over the United States, in which he made a beautiful back-door pass to set up Finland’s second goal.

    It’s starting to become clear that Kiviharju will have the chops to succeed in North America once he makes the jump. He’s signed with HIFK in Liiga (Finland’s top league) through the 2026-27 season, so it’s likely that the earliest the Wild could sign him would be for the 2027-28 season.

    The question is, what is his ceiling? And does that ceiling include the NHL?

    Offensively, he should be suitably effective at any level. He is an excellent puck handler, and while he’s not flashy, he has subtle skill, making many good, efficient, and quick puck handles that he combines with excellent footwork. That allows him to stay square to the play to survey for options and find lanes, makes it difficult for defenders to anticipate his movements and buys him a little extra time and space. 

    As a puck mover, he makes good reads and understands motion and play development in terms of when and where to find or create options in all three zones. I’ve noticed an improvement in his shot over the last year. He doesn’t have a powerful shot or the quickest release, but he’s improved in both areas, and he’s always been good at getting pucks through and shooting for tips or rebounds. 

    He’ll never be a big point producer, but he can be an asset for an offensive unit. He runs a good power play at the junior level, but I don’t know if he projects to do that at the NHL level, because most teams will have better options. I could see him running an AHL power play unit. He currently looks to be getting power play time on HIFK’s second unit, but that power play has only produced at 17.14% success rate, though four of Kiviharju’s seven points on the season have come with the man advantage.

    Defensively, from a foundational standpoint, he has a lot of the tools that could help him succeed long-term. He overcomes his smaller stature in many situations with footwork and a solid base. He’ll get in on an opponent’s hands to take away their stick in front of the net, but he doesn’t lock up too early and get outmuscled by bigger players; he tries to time it so that he has the advantage when his man becomes an option, or when the puck arrives. 

    Kiviharju uses a similar tactic in wall battles. If he gets there first, he’ll win nearly every time because of his footwork and leverage. However, if he doesn’t, he tries to stay in tight and disrupt an opponent’s ability to use his stick to make a play. Then, he’ll look for opportunities to poke the puck loose or lock his man up until he gets support.

    For Kiviharju, the question will always come down to his skating and whether he can continue to adapt as he moves up the levels. He’s not a fast skater and cannot generate quick bursts. That occasionally causes him issues, especially when he has to track speedy opponents around the offensive zone and win races to spots. In these instances, he tries to use his intelligence, reading, and footwork to anticipate and disrupt movements, get into passing lanes, and thwart plays that way. But if he gets caught on a guy’s hip or is at a positional disadvantage, opponents can occasionally exploit that. 

    When Kiviharju is defending the rush, if he gets caught flat-footed or with bad gaps, he has a hard time recovering because he’s not the swiftest backward skater and doesn’t make powerful turns from backward to forward. Kiviharju has largely eliminated the risky poke checks and reaches he was making last year at this time. He also moves well laterally with strong pushes and pull-unders, so if he can keep position, he can defend against faster players.

    If I had to bet right now, I’d guess that Kiviharju eventually becomes an NHL defenseman, but probably a bottom-of-the-lineup one that can play steady but unspectacular minutes. First, he’ll need to prove he can handle the heaviness and physical rigors of North American hockey on a daily basis, and the AHL will allow him to do so. If he succeeds there, I think he’ll transition to the NHL rather easily once he makes the jump. 

    With players like Kiviharju, who are well-rounded and have some tools but look like fringe players on the surface, I look at intelligence, competitiveness, and the ability to stay composed. Those tend to be the separators among prospects who profile similarly, and Kiviharju has each in abundance. He’s a mature player and a leader, and he’s played on some of the biggest hockey stages in the world and thrived. 

    Whether Kiviharju becomes the steal of the 2024 draft remains to be seen, but he looks more and more like a valuable future piece of the Wild organization. 

     

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 5
    • Thanks 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    I wouldn't have thought that 5' 10'' was small.  Yet average height in NHL is 6' 1.5''  with defensemen averaging 6' 2''.  That is a substantial 4 inches below average.  But then Quinn Hughes is only 5' 10''.  

    Seems like strength and skill are more important in today's NHL.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5’ 10” under-sized defenseman that puts up small numbers and is over-confident. Exactly what GMBG ordered, Sign him up so we can begin our rebuild.

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 minutes ago, Fortis said:

    5’ 10” under-sized defenseman that puts up small numbers and is over-confident. Exactly what GMBG ordered, Sign him up so we can begin our rebuild.

    I had the same thought. This kid is Jared spurgeon’s backfill.  Just as small, just as offensive, not as defensive and twice the swagger.  He and Peart will be staples in Iowa. Forgive me if I choose to not climb aboard this hype train

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Longshot for a needle moving NHL career? 
    Yes Impossible No There’s too many examples of successful shorter players to begin adding them to this post. Draft experts are paid millions of $ and even they can’t predict who’s going to break out and stick. I’m giving the kid a chance. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, MNCountryLife said:

    Seems like strength and skill are more important in today's NHL.

    You don’t say! I have it upon good authority that it’s almost impossible to be good in the NHL if you aren’t at least 200 lbs and 6 ft.

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Sounds like he has tons of talent and a huge hockey IQ with the confidence/cockiness to back it up. He just might be a captain type player in the 2030s! Gonna be fun to watch him when he does get here!!

    …and what a great name Eh Aron 

    Edited by Pablo
    • Like 2
    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    For me, my hope would be some other GMs also saw his leadership and calmness, and he is an asset that someone will want. Maybe he can get us something we really need right now. 

    To the surprise of no one, I like my 3rd pairing defenders to be beefy. We've got that now with Midsy and Bogosian...and even Hunt to some extent. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Last night, I saw Hughes turn and lose several players, and having a partner like Faber who also wants to be involved offensively is real good. However, in watching Hughes do this, which seems like it is effortlessly, I also see Faber watching him. 

    I have to wonder if some of his moves and edgework will rub off on Faber too. Faber has real good edges, but not at the Hughes level, and I wonder if he can develop them? Somehow, I've got a feeling they'll be training together this summer.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    I have to wonder if some of his moves and edgework will rub off on Faber

    It already has.  Fabes is looking much more offensive minded IMO.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 1/11/2026 at 4:44 PM, Will D. Ness said:

    It already has.  Fabes is looking much more offensive minded IMO.

    This is true, but if you look closely, Faber is using straight line speed and good acceleration. He's also going in deep in the offensive zone. What he isn't doing is spinning out of trouble like Hughes can. Hughes spins out like one of those tiny smart cars. Faber spins out more like a Honda Pilot. In contrast, Foligno spins out more like a trash truck or school bus. 

    Faber is only a couple of inches taller than Hughes. Could he work on edges over the summer to pull off those short area spins with speed?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, mnfaninnc said:

    This is true, but if you look closely, Faber is using straight line speed and good acceleration. He's also going in deep in the offensive zone. What he isn't doing is spinning out of trouble like Hughes can. Hughes spins out like one of those tiny smart cars. Faber spins out more like a Honda Pilot. In contrast, Foligno spins out more like a trash truck or school bus. 

    Faber is only a couple of inches taller than Hughes. Could he work on edges over the summer to pull off those short area spins with speed?

    I'm not an expert, but I wonder if the law of physics comes into play here.  Fabes has a good 25 lbs on Hughes?  Foligno closer to 50?  There has to be a physical threshold on what a blade edge will take before losing it and it probably is proportional to momentum.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    22 hours ago, Will D. Ness said:

    I'm not an expert, but I wonder if the law of physics comes into play here.  Fabes has a good 25 lbs on Hughes?  Foligno closer to 50?  There has to be a physical threshold on what a blade edge will take before losing it and it probably is proportional to momentum.

    If you look at Hughes, he really dips his shoulders a lot, and uses tremendous leverage. I get Foligno, there's no way he could do it, but Faber is a good enough skater to be able to also do this....except he doesn't. 

    I don't think with Faber it's because he can't. I think with Faber it's because he hasn't thought of it or been taught to do that. So, in the offseason, I see both training together and maybe Faber learning to dip and get low on the blades. It probably won't look the same, but it may be just a bit different. He wouldn't want to try it on a smaller player, but driving on a larger player, he might break their ankles.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Neil, I came across this in a national article:

    Quote
    The 2026 NHL Draft, set for June in Las Vegas, promises to showcase another deep class of talent. Among the players drawing early attention are Michael Misa of the Saginaw Spirit, a dynamic forward with elite scoring instincts; Finnish defenseman Aron Kiviharju, praised for his vision and puck-moving ability; and U.S. National Team Development Program standout James Hagens, who has impressed scouts with his two-way play and leadership. With such high-caliber prospects leading the way, front offices are sharpening their analytical tools more than ever before.

    Why would Kiviharju be up for the draft again? Do we have to give him an ELC offer by a certain time? 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    If you look at Hughes, he really dips his shoulders a lot, and uses tremendous leverage. I get Foligno, there's no way he could do it, but Faber is a good enough skater to be able to also do this....except he doesn't. 

    I don't think with Faber it's because he can't. I think with Faber it's because he hasn't thought of it or been taught to do that. So, in the offseason, I see both training together and maybe Faber learning to dip and get low on the blades. It probably won't look the same, but it may be just a bit different. He wouldn't want to try it on a smaller player, but driving on a larger player, he might break their ankles.

    Honestly... I want Faber to put on another 5 lbs and play just a little stronger with position and on the puck.  I don't think he should try to be a gazelle out there like Hughes.  

    Can he refine things... definitely.  Faber is still pretty raw and 23 years old.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    15 hours ago, Will D. Ness said:

    Can he refine things... definitely.  Faber is still pretty raw and 23 years old.

    This is why I am wondering if he can pull this off. I believe he's around 210 now, and the listed weight is the same as when he came out of college. Yes, he can get stronger, but, can he move from great edges to elite edges merely by using leverage? This is where I think he can, maybe not like Hughes can, but in a way that is better than he is now.

    He can already keep up with Hughes and has very good speed. Imagine if his in and out cuts turn elite? Not only does this help him with the puck, but it also helps him not get beat on the back end!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...