Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness
  • Jared Spurgeon's Time In Minnesota Shouldn't Be Over


    Tony Abbott

    Jared Spurgeon is shaping up to be the hot topic of the Minnesota Wild's offseason. The team announced their captain will undergo season-ending surgery on his hip and back next month, ending his season after only 16 games. Spurgeon's injury coincides with Brock Faber's emergence as a top-pairing caliber defenseman and Spurgeon's full no-move clause turning into a 10-team no-trade clause. 

    Even outside the injuries, Hockey Wilderness wondered whether this season would be make or break for Spurgeon's time in Minnesota. After 14 seasons and 867 games, increasingly more people seem to be questioning the viability of keeping Spurgeon in a Wild uniform. He'll be entering his age-35 season next year, his playoff performances have come under scrutiny, and once this year ends, he'll only have played in 160 of a possible 246 games. 

    Add to the fact that the Wild are entering their last year of cap hell next summer, and freeing up $7.575 million in cap space will be very tempting because Bill Guerin expended much of next year's flexibility with preseason extensions. Is it time to let Spurgeon ride into the sunset?

    The answer is, undoubtedly, no. Of course not. If Spurgeon is a tradeable asset over the summer, he's projected to be healthy next season. And if he has a clean bill of health net fall, then the Wild still need Jared Spurgeon. 

    As the longest-tenured player and captain of a team that hasn't made it past the first round of the playoffs since 2015, it's easy to see why the bloom is falling off Spurgeon's rose. Call it the Curse of Mikko Koivu. If you're a visible player who is a constant during a run of only modest success, people will pick nits in your game. 

    And are there nits to pick? Sure, we suppose. You can point to the playoff stuff and say there's something to it. There might be. Any time you hear "neck surgery," "back surgery," and "turning 35" in the same sentence, that's time to be nervous.

    We can not let ourselves forget just how damn good of a defenseman Spurgeon is, though. On second thought, forget good. He's great. So far, Spurgeon has played in 160 of a possible 208 games since the start of the 2021-22 season. Do you want to guess where he ranks on the Wins Above Replacement leaderboard among defensemen during that time, spotting up to 50 games to his competitors?

    We could tell you where he sits, but showing you might be more effective.

    1. Cale Makar: 8.4 WAR
    2. Quinn Hughes: 7.7 WAR
    3. Devon Toews: 6.9 WAR
    4. Roman Josi: 6.8 WAR
    5. Adam Fox: 6.4 WAR
    6. Charlie McAvoy: 6.3 WAR
    7. JARED SPURGEON: 6.0 WAR
    8. Jaccob Slavin: 5.9 WAR
    9. Thomas Chabot: 5.8 WAR
    10. Mattias Ekholm: 5.6 WAR

    Spurgeon's been a top-10 defenseman on the Wild in the past two-and-a-half seasons. And again, that's with him down 20 to 35 games compared to most of the other names on the list. In terms of impact when they're in the game, no one is better. For every hour Spurgeon is on the ice at 5-on-5, his expected goals differential is 0.36 higher than the Wild an hour without him. Among defensemen with 2000-plus 5-on-5 minutes, only Fox matches him in that category.

    That's all well and good, you might say, but what about actual goals? Fair question, as actual goals are what count on the scoresheet. But Spurgeon is still the best, and it's not close. The Wild's goal differential with Spurgeon on the ice is 0.88 higher than without him patrolling the blueline at 5-on-5. That's first among NHL defensemen by 0.17 goals per hour.

    Never mind defensemen, it's a greater impact than elite forwards like Auston Matthews (0.86), Jason Robertson (0.78), and Sidney Crosby (0.66) made on their teams. Only Matthew Tkachuk (1.11) and Pavel Buchnevich (1.08) can claim to be better than Spurgeon in the past three years.

    Put another way, for every 68 minutes of 5-on-5 ice time, Spurgeon is spotting the Wild a goal they wouldn't otherwise have. Since he plays an average of 15 minutes and 28 seconds of 5-on-5 time a night, his impact comes out to about one 5-on-5 goal every 4.5 games or so. That's unbelievable. 

    After all that, it won't surprise you that Kirill Kaprizov (7.2 WAR) is the only Wild player who's been more valuable than Spurgeon these past three years. But seeing the leaderboard for WAR among Wild players this season might surprise you.

    1. Brock Faber: 1.3 WAR
    2. Kirill Kaprizov: 1.2 WAR
    3. Mats Zuccarello: 1.0 WAR
    4. Jonas Brodin: 1.0 WAR
    5. Marcus Johansson: 0.9 WAR
    6. Matt Boldy: 0.8 WAR
    7. Joel Eriksson Ek: 0.8 WAR
    8. JARED SPURGEON: 0.7 WAR
    9. Zach Bogosian: 0.6 WAR
    10. Ryan Hartman: 0.6 WAR

    That's all in 16 games! Just under 40% of the Wild's season so far! It doesn't matter; he's still been a top 10 player on the team, and that's with him very obviously not at full health. As long as he can play, he's a rock star. Minnesota can't forget that this offseason.

    But you don't need fancy stats to see that. Just look at the team that posted back-to-back 100-point seasons. Now look at this year's Wild. What's the difference?

    Sure, they lost Matt Dumba. But they backfilled him with Faber, who immediately became a top rookie. That can't be it. Spotty goaltending? Sure, that's a factor. But these are the same goalies that performed pretty well last season. Offseason departures like Ryan Reaves and Sam Steel? You've gotta be kidding. 

    No, when diagnosing the root cause of the Wild's dramatic step back, we have to use the KISS method. Keep It Simple: Spurgeon.

    We're watching this Wild team limp their way to a .446 points percentage. They're getting blown out routinely and sitting further from a playoff spot than very bad teams like the Arizona Coyotes, Buffalo Sabres, and Montreal Canadiens. If anyone can watch this all play out and conclude that Minnesota doesn't need Spurgeon, they may be in for a rude awakening if the Wild front office agrees.

    All data via Evolving-Hockey unless otherwise stated. 

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    I want Spurgeon back...if he's healthy.  That's going to be the biggest thing.  There's no really replacing Brodin and Spurgeon yet (outside of a big trade or a high draft pick).  Until the Wild can show they have a new guy to add to Faber's emergence, if Spurgeon is good to go, keep him.  I'm not sure trading him (even with money retention) will do.  I don't know if teams will value Spurgeon the way he is here.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I had a lot more to say in the matter on Thomas' article mentioning Spurgeon's out for the season. In summary, I am very concerned/worried that this is it for him. Many players recover from hip surgery, or back surgery. However, Spurgeon is facing both, and we have no idea how one is connected to the other.

    Still, it would not be right, at least in my eyes, to buyout the player. If he comes back as damaged goods, LTIR is the best place for him. Other players watch what teams do with their injured players, and since he was injured on the ice, his contract needs to be fulfilled and there is a remedy for this: LTIR. 

    I also believe that if this is the case, Spurgeon can still be a very valuable member of the team either in coaching or front office. If he's on LTIR, I'd think he could be working in either spot. 

    Player goodwill is a real thing, and building loyalty among players is important, but loyalty is a 2-way street and doing the right thing is important. This particular thing is something I believe Guerin takes seriously and is very good at. 

    I'm not sure what the ramifications would be should Spurgeon decide to retire, but giving a hip and back to the team, to me, warrants getting to the end of your contract. As damaged goods, I would say he is virtually untradeable mainly because the knock on him is his size and can he hold up.

    I don't think I'd necessarily replace him on defense now, I think I'd take the rest of the season to find out what I had in the A. I think I'd reassess in May and see how Spurgeon's rehab is going and sit down and have this hard conversation with him. If I'm Spurgeon's wife and kids, I may not want to risk my husband/dad being crippled for life.

    I'm also very worried/concerned that the surgeon's will find prior damage in both areas. These surgeries are not cut and dry. The risk of him being broken again, I think would be high.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    You are making it sound like he'd have a decent trade market then.. 

    What if we trade Spurgeon, get a decent pick back, and use about half his would-be cap-hit to replace him with Dumba in the offseason?

    Seems like a win-win to me!

    • Confused 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, B1GKappa97 said:

    What if we trade Spurgeon, get a decent pick back, and use about half his would-be cap-hit to replace him with Dumba in the offseason?

    I like Dumba.  He is a solid player.  Spurgeon is better... and it isn't even close.  What is worse is that Dumba has already been injured and his play is already dropping at 29 years old.  He isn't coming back.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If you want a competitive team, you start the build at defense.  It is a must to have 4 quality D on the team.  Spurgeon, Brodin, Faber and Middleton fit this mold and will again next year.  The problem comes about when 1 or 2 of them is injured.  The drop off to Alex, Merrill, Hunt, Mermis etc... is massive.  It's okay that they are not top 4 quality... but we need better from 5, 6 and 7.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    A few nights ago BG had his midseason Press Conference. He had to know at that point what was happening with El Capitan, yet he said the push was for the playoffs and he believed the team was good enough to get there.

    I haven't checked the standings in awhile but this team has got to be quite a ways from a play off spot and in a pretty good position for the draft lottery. It will be interesting to see what he does here. I believe if he makes a deal for a defenseman it just cements my position that he needs to go.

    At this point of the season this team just needs to get some of the AHL guys experience and let's see what we have.

    Edited by Willy the poor boy
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I’m thinking JS transitions well to 3-6 D positions quite well as needed. Of course that’s after we develop replacements in the top pairing then middle D. I think he’s a team leader through and through. I don’t think losing the C would affect him one bit either. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, B1GKappa97 said:

    You are making it sound like he'd have a decent trade market then.. 

    What if we trade Spurgeon, get a decent pick back, and use about half his would-be cap-hit to replace him with Dumba in the offseason?

    Seems like a win-win to me!

    Dumba is a perfect example of this. He can't even shoot anymore. He's in the scratch and dent section of the store. I loved Dumba as a player here, but everyone has to realize when it's over, and it's over. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, MNCountryLife said:

    The drop off to Alex, Merrill, Hunt, Mermis etc... is massive.  It's okay that they are not top 4 quality... but we need better from 5, 6 and 7.

    I would argue that Goligoski and Merrill should be moved and we let Hunt, Mermis and Lambos learn up here. I can take "learning" play from the kids, but when the vets continue to make the mistakes, I do not have the tolerance for that.

    Plus, to me, Hunt and Mermis have passed them on the depth chart. I'd keep scratching Goligoski hoping he waives his NMC.

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    39 minutes ago, Willy the poor boy said:

    I haven't checked the standings in awhile but this team has got to be quite a ways from a play off spot and in a pretty good position for the draft lottery. It will be interesting to see what he does here. I believe if he makes a deal for a defenseman it just cements my position that he needs to go.

    At this point of the season this team just needs to get some of the AHL guys experience and let's see what we have.

    I sort of agree with this. I think if he brings someone in, it would have to be a solution for the future. We have solidified our position as 6th in the draft (without the lottery) I am still rooting for Lindstrom, the 6'3" 215 center who plays a Tkachukian style. 

    Outside of that, the 6'7" Russian defender is my next target. I'm just hoping Guerin doesn't sell the future for 3 months of the present. Both Pesce and Hanifan could be resigned, and are top 4 guys.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Also, remember we've lost our 'cap guy'. It was odd hearing that, the NHL was going to be 'helping us' with that for the rest of the season. Makes me wonder  (given our dumpster fire) how handicapped we are with our decision making: we will be playing checkers while others are playing chess. You have to think definitely, no end of season type, we've get enough cap to help you swing this Ryan O'Reilly trade for pick(s).

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    21 hours ago, Willy the poor boy said:

    yet he said the push was for the playoffs and he believed the team was good enough to get there.

    Either him and the owner are delusional or he thinks us fans are incredibly stupid.

    its actually insulting that he made a comment like that.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 1/19/2024 at 2:38 PM, mnfaninnc said:

    I would argue that Goligoski and Merrill should be moved and we let Hunt, Mermis and Lambos learn up here. I can take "learning" play from the kids, but when the vets continue to make the mistakes, I do not have the tolerance for that.

    Plus, to me, Hunt and Mermis have passed them on the depth chart. I'd keep scratching Goligoski hoping he waives his NMC.

    It wouldn't be an argument.  I agree.  If you have defenders all producing the same results... you choose the ones that have potential to improve.  I have no idea why Merrill and Goligoski are on the ice... ever.

    I thought the last game against Florida was Brodin's best in the last few weeks.  Not surprising it took him a game or 2 to get his game back in shape.  He plays hard minutes.  Brodin and Faber were so much better than everyone else it becomes easy to understand why we have a losing record when both Spurgeon and Brodin have been out for a large chunk of the season.  Middleton doesn't match Faber, Spurge and Brodin on skill..  but he makes up for it with size, strength and determination skill to become a very viable top 4 D man.. and the drop off between our top 3 and him is not that noticeable.  He is close.

    If we had 3 more guys at or near the skill level of Mid we would be fine.  But we don't... and we aren't.   This is why losing Dumba hurt.  His level is on par with Middleton.  Properly building a team means you start with the D.  We seem to have them in the pipeline.  You have mentioned a number of them in several posts.  The faster we get them here the faster we can improve our D and our W/Ls.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Did anyone else notice this deployment against FL? 

    Brodin-Faber

    Middleton-Mermis

    Goligoski-Bogosian

    Yet, when it came to crunch time with about 10 minutes left in the game, and we were scratching and clawing, clinging on to a 1 goal lead, the deployment went

    Brodin-Faber

    Middleton-Bogosian

    Mermis-Goligoski-benched

    I'd say that puts into perspective exactly where we are at. Mermis and Goligoski could have sniffed some TOI if one of those 4 were penalized. I think that Hynes has figured out a pretty good depth of each defender.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Mermis is a call up 7D.  Some games he looks like he could make a starting roster as a 3rd pair guy but on average I don't think he is there.  He is what I thought Merrill was last season.

    Merrill has fallen off a cliff.  Goligoski is in free fall right next to him but for some reason given a pass (probably because he makes 2M).  

    Hunt is clearly better than all three but is a little green and lacks confidence.  I'm really glad he is getting PP time and has shown aptitude for it.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 1/20/2024 at 11:42 AM, Mateo3xm said:

    Either him and the owner are delusional or he thinks us fans are incredibly stupid.

    its actually insulting that he made a comment like that.

    Every good dictator says and does what he thinks is right regardless of what others tell him or what reality presents.  If Benito spends any capital to bring a re-tread d-man for this seasons delusional playoff push we can mark the tape, and call this Benito’s past the point of no return as Wild GM.  

    Your move hot shot

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...