Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness
  • Dean Evason's Firing Was About More Than Dean Evason


    Image courtesy of Brace Hemmelgam-USA Today Sports
    Tony Abbott

    It's shocking how fast things turned, but it's not tough to see why the Minnesota Wild dismissed head coach Dean Evason and assistant coach Bob Woods on Monday afternoon. After dropping their seventh game in a row, a 4-1 clunker to the Detroit Red Wings, Minnesota now sits at 30th in the league, with just two points separating them from the 31st-place Chicago Blackhawks and four from the dead-last San Jose Sharks.

    The Wild are reportedly hiring John Hynes and going for a turnaround, but being seven points out of a playoff spot after Thanksgiving makes the road ahead difficult, even with a new voice. Worse yet, the Wild are a whopping 12 points from third place in the Central Division. That means that if the Wild do go on a run starting tomorrow night, they can only (realistically) claim a Wild Card spot. In that case, they'd face a first-round date with a Western Conference heavyweight like the Stars, Colorado Avalanche, Vegas Golden Knights, or Los Angeles Kings.

    "Why bother?" might well be the attitude of a Wild fan base that has seen better versions of this core do worse in the first round of the playoffs. Why not let this team sink? Especially with a prize like Macklin Celebrini at the end of the rainbow for one lucky bad team. So why are the Wild looking to salvage the season?

    If any team would get a pass for taking a step back, it would be this Wild team. They're buckling under nearly $15 million in buyout penalties, severely restricting their team-building ability. While Evason's seat got too hot for him to stay on as coach, general manager Bill Guerin's seat is firmly entrenched.

    The Wild just promoted Guerin to President of Hockey Operations this past offseason and gave him an extension. With the exception of Paul Fenton's truly bizarre 14-month run, owner Mr. Craig Leipold has shown tremendous long-term faith in general managers. David Poile stood as GM for Mr. Leipold's entire run as owner of the Nashville Predators. Chuck Fletcher held his post for nearly a decade, even with little playoff success to show for it.

    This is all to say that if Guerin does something drastic to save the Wild's season in the next short while, it's not about self-preservation. If it's not about self-preservation, though, what is it about?

    Two words: Number ninety-seven.

    What separates the Wild from a rebuilding team? All due respect to remarkably solid players like Jared Spurgeon, Jonas Brodin, and Joel Eriksson Ek, but Kirill Kaprizov is that difference. Despite his well-documented struggles this season and not quite looking like himself, Kaprizov is still an in-his-prime superstar. Getting him back on track represents the only hope of getting the Wild back to their winning ways and is also the biggest reason to wish for them to do so.

    This season can't be fun for Kaprizov. Say what you will about what they've done when his Wild get to the playoffs, but all Kaprizov knows is winning. During his first three seasons in Minnesota, the Wild registered a points percentage of .661, or an average of 108 points per 82 games. Dating back to his KHL days, Kaprizov hasn't missed a postseason since 2015-16, when the 18-year-old was playing for his hometown Mettallurg Novokuznetsk. 

    Unfortunately, this season is probably the worst time for the Wild to collapse, and it's because of Kaprizov. The State of Hockey is months away from seeing a large amount of power fall into Kaprizov's hands. Kaprizov's No-Move Clause will kick in at the start of the new league year (July 1). Before that point, Minnesota has complete control over what they do with his contract. After July 1, Kaprizov gets the final say.

    This means that if, say, the Wild miss the playoffs and Kaprizov becomes unhappy with the situation, he can not only request a trade but dictate which suitors can trade for him. There is potential for him to not only engineer a way out but also depress the market for his services by targeting a single destination.

    To be clear, we have no insight into Kaprizov's mindset or willingness to stay in Minnesota long-term. We aren't fear-mongering. It's simply a reality that Minnesota has to account for and hedge against, which they've (likely) been doing since this summer. You can read this summer's extensions to linemates Mats Zuccarello and Ryan Hartman as efforts to keep Kaprizov happy. In naming him an alternate captain, the Wild seemed to attempt to solidify his feeling of ownership over this team.

    Making the playoffs is part of that project, even if it means having to offer Evason up as a sacrificial lamb. It's important to give a taste of success to Kaprizov during these dead cap years in tandem with selling him on the team's emerging prospect base. Maybe Kaprizov is looking forward to the team's future to the point where he can be patient without short-term success. But is Guerin going to risk it if he can help it? The answer is obviously "no."

    It's easy to say that the Wild's long-term interests are best served with the team staying the course and letting what happens happens. That might mean turning it around for a playoff run, it may include the Wild continuing their Playing Like A Weenie For Celebrini campaign. Still, Guerin is 100% right to fear a potential Kaprizov departure. The biggest reason anyone's talked about the team for the past three years is because of the star power he commands. He's been the engine of Minnesota's recent successes. Without him, the long-term future of the team gets muddied.

    Yes, the emergence of Matt Boldy (present struggles notwithstanding), Marco Rossi, and Brock Faber are extremely encouraging. So is having Jesper Wallstedt, Danila Yurov, and Riley Heidt emerging as star prospects behind them. But no one can count on their prospect pool regularly churning out stars. Even so, if all those prospects become impact players, they're still better off with Kaprizov anchoring and elevating the bunch.

    As fruitless as making the playoffs seems as a goal, the point is that the Wild and Guerin almost certainly need Kaprizov for long-term viability. There aren't many paths to being better in a Kaprizov-less future. And there's no upside for Guerin to be the person who let Kaprizov and Kevin Fiala get away in the span of three years. If you're wondering why the Wild would bother to try getting back on track, all you have to do is tap into your existential dread at the thought of what happens after a lost season.

    This isn't to say Evason didn't have his own problems leading to his dismissal. He couldn't get Kaprizov or Boldy going offensively this season, his team's defensive structure and penalty kill collapsed, and this compounded with wretched goaltending. Still, it's easy to argue that the winningest coach in team history (.639 career points percentage) got a raw deal.

    Maybe he did. But at the end of the day, this wasn't about him or anything he did. It was about the chips the Wild had already pushed into the middle to make the playoffs this year. More importantly, it was about the urgency to go further into "all-in" territory for a postseason berth in a bid to solidify Kaprizov's future with the team. Agree with it or not, the Wild were always going to head down this path. We'll now see if it works.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 5

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    On 12/3/2023 at 3:48 AM, Mateo3xm said:

    They are able to pick players like Point, Kuch, Cirelli and others after they had been passed over dozens of times.

    These were what won them a cup, not Stamkos and Hedman. Add in a couple of very nice trades they had to shore up the defense. Plus, they had Vassy. Stamkos was a minor factor in their cup runs as he was hurt. Hedman has been a beast, I'll give you that one. 

    My point is, though, that it doesn't always turn out well for the teams that are tanking either on purpose or by futility. Equally, they need luck! Edmonton and Buffalo should not just have had elite top talent, but they should have had solid secondary talent from the top of the 2nd round. Neither really got that, and Buffalo had other 1st round picks that weren't so good. That's a lot of pain!

    Boston didn't build their team with a bunch of early picks. Montreal has had a lot of draft picks but little to show for it yet. AZ is a dumpster fire over and over again. 

    If you draft the right guys from wherever your position is and they fit your system, you should be successful. If you just happen to hit in 2/3 draft years extremely lucky, you tend to have very good success. Hitting would be defined as 3-4 draft picks that play a significant role on your team. In recent years, we've got that opportunity, specifically if our 1s hit. 

    Now, also doing it the way the Wild have done it, you are probably waiting 5 years for those guys to develop from their draft day. This is where the disconnect is, because many people are busting these players at 21-22 years old. 

    There is one thing that hasn't been stressed and I think needs to be within the organization: strength addition. It doesn't happen naturally, though that can help, you've got to be dedicated early on to the gym and getting strength bulk. This league demands it!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 12/5/2023 at 10:12 AM, mnfaninnc said:

    These were what won them a cup, not Stamkos and Hedman.

     

    “Widely considered to be one of the best defencemen in the NHL, Hedman is a five-time James Norris Memorial Trophy finalist, winning the award in 2018. Hedman won back-to-back Stanley Cups with the Lightning in 2020 and 2021, and won the Conn Smythe Trophy as the most valuable player in the 2020 playoffs.”

    did you catch that Conn Smythe Trophy?

    he had 22pts in 25 games in the playoffs in 2020.

    Hedman didn’t play a ton of regular season games for their 2 cup runs but the bolts don’t win Stanley cups without a number 1 defenseman like him. Just about every single Stanley cup winning team has a number 1 defenseman in Hedman’s caliber.

    dont tell me Hedman and Stamkos had nothing to do with it.

    they absolutely did. You make yourself look goofy saying otherwise.

    Stamkos had 18pts in 23 games in the 2021 playoffs.

    Stamkos didn’t play a ton both those years but he still had 66pts in 57 games in 2020.

    Ive always thought that Tampa is one of if not the best team in the nhl when it comes to drafting. It’s absolutely incredible how they found some of those guys but youre lying to yourself if you don’t think they benefited enormously from getting the 2nd overall pick in Hedman who in his prime was one of the best.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 12/5/2023 at 10:12 AM, mnfaninnc said:

    These were what won them a cup, not Stamkos and Hedman. Add in a couple of very nice trades they had to shore up the defense. Plus, they had Vassy. Stamkos was a minor factor in their cup runs as he was hurt. Hedman has been a beast, I'll give you that one. 

    My point is, though, that it doesn't always turn out well for the teams that are tanking either on purpose or by futility. Equally, they need luck! Edmonton and Buffalo should not just have had elite top talent, but they should have had solid secondary talent from the top of the 2nd round. Neither really got that, and Buffalo had other 1st round picks that weren't so good. That's a lot of pain!

    Boston didn't build their team with a bunch of early picks. Montreal has had a lot of draft picks but little to show for it yet. AZ is a dumpster fire over and over again. 

    If you draft the right guys from wherever your position is and they fit your system, you should be successful. If you just happen to hit in 2/3 draft years extremely lucky, you tend to have very good success. Hitting would be defined as 3-4 draft picks that play a significant role on your team. In recent years, we've got that opportunity, specifically if our 1s hit. 

    Now, also doing it the way the Wild have done it, you are probably waiting 5 years for those guys to develop from their draft day. This is where the disconnect is, because many people are busting these players at 21-22 years old. 

    There is one thing that hasn't been stressed and I think needs to be within the organization: strength addition. It doesn't happen naturally, though that can help, you've got to be dedicated early on to the gym and getting strength bulk. This league demands it!

    Of course it doesn’t always turn out.

    theres only one team that can win.

    If you dont have most of: great drafting, great management, great coaching, great trades, a big team built for the playoffs physicality, superstars or generational picks and luck, you’re not winning anything.

    all those teams you listed have been notoriously badly managed that’s why it’s taken so long. That’s a given.

    The point you’re trying to make is so strange to me. Of course getting picks in the top 5 isn’t everything but it’s probably one of the most consistent things I’ve seen in Cup winning teams along with exceptional drafting.

    Just look at how these cup winning teams are made. Look at what they all have in common.

    I’ll post some more stuff on this when I have time but 80-90% of the cup winning teams in the last 20 or so years had at least one top 1-5 pick who was a cornerstone of the team. A number 1 defenseman, Center, Goalie or winger.

    if you have exceptional drafting like the Bruins and Blues then you can win one by getting lucky but that doesn’t happen often at all. If you’re banking on that you’re in for a loooong and disappointing wait.

    you figure the Wild will have a good chance at winning a cup by not tanking at least for a little bit when their drafting is average or maybe a little above average?

    how do you honestly figure they are going to win because I don’t see it.

    Im not looking for the Wild to be a good team, im looking for the Wild to win a Stanley Cup. 

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 12/8/2023 at 3:52 AM, Mateo3xm said:

    dont tell me Hedman and Stamkos had nothing to do with it.

    they absolutely did. You make yourself look goofy saying otherwise.

    Nobody is saying they had nothing to do with it! But to say both are THE reason for the cup wins makes no sense. They were part of the solutions, but Vassy, Point, Kuch, and that 3rd line were just as responsible if not more so than those 2 players. I value Hedman, but he doesn't play all 60 minutes. He was extremely good and had more to do with the wins than Stamkos, but to say they were THE reasons isn't being honest. They don't win without the cast I mentioned, and they don't win without some of the trades they made for role players. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 12/8/2023 at 4:17 AM, Mateo3xm said:

    you figure the Wild will have a good chance at winning a cup by not tanking at least for a little bit when their drafting is average or maybe a little above average?

    how do you honestly figure they are going to win because I don’t see it.

    Im not looking for the Wild to be a good team, im looking for the Wild to win a Stanley Cup. 

    Because in the research I did a few years ago on this revealed it wasn't the top picks that put teams over the top, it was the hitting on 3-4 draft picks in a 3 year time period that did it. Hitting on the draft picks is defined as them playing a significant role on the team. 

    I did not research trading for prospects in those draft years or players who made it from those draft years being added, that may be a component involved too. 

    So, here is my point: It takes far more than just tanking and getting top draft picks for this to work, it takes hitting on other picks too. It's far easier to do it if you have a top pick, or if you've sold off players for 1sts and have multiple 1sts in a 3 year span, but even that is not a lock. 

    The key is getting those 3-4 draft picks in the fold. For instance, in the Ek year, we had Greenway, Kahkonen and Kaprizov. If we had backed up that draft with another great draft where we could get 3-4 players, we could have really had something. But, instead, Fletcher traded off picks so we never had the chance. 

    Guerin had 2 1sts in b2b years. Let's say we hit on all 4 of those, and we've got 3 more players come in with 2 drafts. That plays a more important role in developing a Stanley Cup winning team than just having a couple of top picks and missing on the rest of the draft. This is why Edmonton couldn't get ahead, and probably why Buffalo failed. I have no explanation for AZ, they're just cursed. The key is having that age group nucleus that grows up together, challenges each other and gets through some wars together. It's harder to do this, but it is possible to do it.

    Within that window, having Yurov and The Wall drop out of the top selections to fall to us late and develop into superstars could be the luck we needed. Also having Lambos and Ohgren develop into stars would help. Put in our Rossi draft where Hunt, and maybe Dino come out, that's 3 drafts in a row where we'd have solid players coming out. That's the type of cluster that you need to eventually win. I found this to be the most important factor.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...