Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness
  • A Quiet Off-Season Could Mean Big Things for the Minnesota Wild


    Image courtesy of Sam Navarro-USA TODAY Sports
    Mikki Tuohy

    This summer has been quiet for the Minnesota Wild. While there has been sporadic news, there is no overarching drama like previous seasons. That could be a very good thing, though. Let’s look back at previous off-seasons to see why.

    No More Superstar?

    In 2021, there was the big “will he, won’t he” surrounding Kirill Kaprizov’s contract extension that didn’t end until the night before training camp started. Fans spent months picking apart anything they could find to figure out if Kaprizov was coming back, including tracking his social media “likes” to sway opinions one way or the other.

    Russia Trip Gone Bad

    The summer of 2022 was even bigger. It contained the mega Kevin Fiala trade, where the Wild received Brock Faber and a draft pick, which they ended up using on Liam Ohgren. That would’ve been enough, and fans could’ve spent the rest of the summer waiting for the season to start. Except Kaprizov was stuck in Russia, and the Wild were incredibly tight-lipped about giving any information away. He ended up back in Minnesota by the beginning of August, but not after almost a month of worry.

    Ill-Fated Contracts?

    During the 2023 off-season, the Wild signed many veteran players to contract extensions. The Wild handed Freddy Gaudreau, Marcus Foligno, Mats Zuccarello, and Marcus Johansson multi-year contract extensions. And at the time, all of these contracts made at least a little sense. Minnesota had traded for Johansson that year, and he had set Matt Boldy on fire. The other three were coming off career years. However, hindsight makes everyone do a bit of a double-take.

    What About This Off-Season?

    The biggest story was Brock Faber’s contract extension. It’s awesome and well-deserved for the young man, but it wasn’t exactly a secret. Fans knew it was coming and even knew the price range it would fall into. Otherwise, it's all been smaller news.

    Why Is That Good?

    Considering all of the above, it doesn’t seem to matter much how chaotic the off-season is. However, all of those seasons ended with a playoff run until this year. While those ended in the first round, it was at least a battle to the very end. 

    2024 was different. There was a point late in the season when it was mathematically impossible for the Wild to make the playoffs. Still, they had to go out there and play a few more games, knowing that they had effectively failed.

    After that, the players ended up doing two different things and were valuable in their own way. The first was rest and recovery. As always, a handful of players battled injuries and needed surgeries or procedures. They were able to start the healing process a month early, so hopefully, they can come into training camp fully healed.

    The rest of the players flew to Europe to play in the IIHF Men’s World Championship, giving them a unique opportunity to play with different players and under different head coaches. It was a good way to work on honing their skills or trying out something new and allowed them to maintain their conditioning for an extra month.

    2024 Season, Here They Come

    In the best possible outcome, the Wild players will be extra motivated to start the year off with a bang. Between the losing record last October that ended with Dean Evason being fired to missing a playoff run, it seems like they will be giving 110% from the start. Despite a roster that some see as lacking, their hunger to win may help overcome that in the end.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    22 hours ago, Need4speed99 said:

    People talk about beating dead horses yet no one gets over the fact that the wild have been basically mediocre for the last 15 years by largely following the same operating procedure. They never do a rebuild always trying to stay "competitive" never too bad but never a contender. 

    The sarcasm was great, bring up the 2 smallest contracts to try and make a point. The point is they have too much tied up into bottom six players for too long. You guys all say they aren't handicapped and in 2 yrs they won't all have NTC's but at that point who is going to trade to take on those contracts? If those players continue to regress(as age indicates they will) then what value will they have more than 4th liners.

    Now as for prospects, what happens if they don't pan out or just end up being middle or bottom 6 guys... they will need contracts too. At that point you will still not have the cap space in to bring in a legit scorer. Stuck in the mushy middle.

    As for this year, alot of relying on injured and aging players to bounce back... the hedging bets would mean you would look at data and trends and bet more heavily on the higher probabilities. No matter how you cut that the numbers would be heavily on seeing more decline from aging players and older players coming back from injury not being the same player as they were. 

    I'm not going to say this is 100% Billy's fault, liepold seems to care only about fans in the stands,hence the same pattern with the wild front office. 

    I never like billy, his arrogance, unwilling to change, love for vets, and love for "his" guys while never giving others a fair shake annoys me.

    I've been a mn fan my whole life and am tired of mn sports busting out their slogan of "next year" or always having excuses. The young fans buy into it and talk about being optimistic and "real" fans when people are negative. Sports are patterns, pay attention long enough and you will see them. One thing about mn sports is they all seem to have either inept ownership, management, or coaching, or a combo of all 3.

    I don't jump on bandwagons, I sit back and observe and so far I see billy and liepold conducting business as usual, per the wild of the last 15 years. 

     

    There's a handful of things I'd agree with here. I just don't agree you need to break things down 100% and try to get a top pick like Toronto or Edmonton or Montreal, NJ, NY, LA, Ottawa, Buffalo, Utah, Detroit, or Chicago have done. 

    MN isn't perfect and neither is Guerin but it's not that bad right now AND this is the beginning of the period we've waited for at the end of the worst penalty years.

    Guerin's plan is not bad and it's more clear what that was, looking back. Build draft capital, revamp the roster, and sign new core while being competitive without getting into new contract quicksand. 

    If the few veteran-loyalty deals he's dished out is enough for some people to discredit all the good transactions or signings, then we'll just have to disagree a little on that. Guerin didn't start with a clean slate. He had to dig out of a hole first. He's done a good job. The Wild are a solid team. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    22 hours ago, Protec said:

    There's a handful of things I'd agree with here. I just don't agree you need to break things down 100% and try to get a top pick like Toronto or Edmonton or Montreal, NJ, NY, LA, Ottawa, Buffalo, Utah, Detroit, or Chicago have done. 

    MN isn't perfect and neither is Guerin but it's not that bad right now AND this is the beginning of the period we've waited for at the end of the worst penalty years.

    Guerin's plan is not bad and it's more clear what that was, looking back. Build draft capital, revamp the roster, and sign new core while being competitive without getting into new contract quicksand. 

    If the few veteran-loyalty deals he's dished out is enough for some people to discredit all the good transactions or signings, then we'll just have to disagree a little on that. Guerin didn't start with a clean slate. He had to dig out of a hole first. He's done a good job. The Wild are a solid team. 

    At this point I'm not saying blow it up for a top pick but rather sit some vets and let the kids play. This year is kind of a "lost" year. At best the squeaking the playoffs and get bounced.

    We know the ceilings of the vets and we know as they age it gets lower, see what you have in the pipeline.

    Guerin came into a perennial playoff team or close too much like Fletcher had. Fletcher built through the draft at first, later trading away the future. 

    This is just like 09 when Fletcher came in. The patterns are the same. 

    Again what happens if the prospects fail, what cap space do they have over the next few yrs? What happens if they can't show they are a contender in 2 yrs and kap leaves, where are they then? Sure they can rely on midling pickups to keep them relevant but when do they get serious and become actual contenders. If you say in about 3 to 4 yrs, sorry you missed the boat. Kap is gone and we have the leagues highest paid 4th line.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Side note; the nhl would never give the wild the 1st pick, somehow only your top markets get that after their first time being one of the biggest bottom feeders in the league. This is why buffalo, NJ, AZ, and Ottawa failed. They haven't had a no1 and no2 back to back. Isn't that much obvious.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...