Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • Zeev Buium Is A Bona Fide Top Prospect


    Image courtesy of Brace Hemmelgarn-Imagn Images
    Robert Brent

    The Minnesota Wild are building the foundations of a solid future. 

    Experts believe Minnesota’s front office drafts well, and several prospects appear ready to make an impact in the NHL. Marat Khusnutdinov, Liam Ohgren, and Jesper Wallstedt have all played games for the Wild this year. Meanwhile, Danila Yurov seems to be on the way soon. The team's farm system is so good that Scott Wheeler recently ranked them second in the NHL in his yearly prospect rankings.

    Wheeler had them at 11th in the same rankings last year. The heavy lifting of the improved ranking is the new crown jewel of the Wild's prospect pool.

    Zeev Buium. 

    When the Wild drafted Buium 12th overall in last year's draft, people immediately considered him a steal. We ranked Buium as the Wild's third-best prospect entering the season behind Yurov and Wallstedt, and the pick has only aged better since. Buium is a great defender with a winning pedigree. He had just finished a historic season at Denver University, becoming the first teenager to score 50 points in a season in over 20 years.

    Buium has built on his breakout year. In his second year at Denver, he turned himself into more than just a good prospect that the Wild got as a draft steal. Instead, the Californian is now a genuine top-defensive prospect in the league. 

    After a draft year as productive as Buium's, imagining how he could improve was difficult. How do you improve historic scoring totals capped off by a national championship and World Juniors Gold Medal? 

    Buium has answered by refining his impressive arsenal of skills. 

    Last year, Buium showed the ability to be a positive player in every phase of the game. He wasn't bad defensively, but his offensive prowess stood out. Buium has been more committed to improving his defensive play and dominating possessions this season. 

    "The harder I play in my own end and take pride in it," Buium told the Star Tribune, "the more likely I'm not going to be playing defense as much."

    It's an approach that has already resulted in better all-around play and even improved his offense. Buium isn't letting the game come to him. Instead, he's involving himself in every level of play. 

    A player who can make a strong defensive play in his own end, execute a breakout pass, join the rush, and set up in the offensive zone all at the same time? That's a dangerous skill.

    Denver and Team USA coach David Carle also spoke about this ability.

    "He knows he needs to crank it up a little bit," Carle said. "So, that's what I think is really impressive about him is he has an ability to interpret what the game needs from him, and he can adapt and give it what it needs."

    His hockey IQ and high-end skills make him an elite offensive organizer. When Buium is on the ice, Denver's play on both ends flows through him. He's a smooth-skating puck-mover and a breakout quarterback. His mix of instincts, speed, and commitment to defense allow him to overcome his average stature in making plays in his end. 

    When you compare Buium to some of the league's top defenders, he fits the mold of a modern elite NHL defender. He plays college hockey and doesn't have elite size, but he isn't small, either. He can play an extremely well-rounded game, even if explosive offense is his primary weapon. Players like Cale Makar, Quinn Hughes, Adam Fox, and Charlie McAvoy are similar and among the league's most elite blueliners. 

    While Buium's play has been encouraging, it is impossible to look past the eye-popping stat sheet. Early in the season, Buium was producing but not quite at the level he had in his previous year. With no goals and 10 points in his first 10 games, the blueliner had impressive production but not the elite scoring we saw in his 50-point freshman campaign. 

    Part of that decreased production was due to Buium's evolving role at Denver, which includes more responsibility. The team relies on him more defensively and as a play-driver than last season. Buium focused more on the process than the results. His stats indicate that his investment in improving his overall game is paying meaningful dividends.

    Buium's stat sheet production is catching up with his play. Now, he's scoring at a similar pace to last season while still playing a more well-rounded game. 

    He has 32 points in 26 games, including 13 in his previous 10. That's a rate of 1.23 points per game, better than the 1.19 points he registered as a freshman. His 32 points are the most among college defenders. If Denver makes a deep run, he could have another 50-point season. Since 2009-10, only two defenders, Buium and Brendan Smith, have reached that 50-point mark in college hockey. Now, Buium has an opportunity to do it twice. 

    Buium has myriad elite skills he’s constantly improving. He is also a historic producer. Those two attributes would already be enough to make him a top prospect. However, he also has a track record of being a consummate winner. 

    Even at 19, Buium has already experienced more winning than many great hockey players do in their careers. In his freshman season, he won the national championship with Denver and played a key role in winning a gold medal for the USA at the 2024 World Juniors. 

    He followed up that gold medal this year with another in the 2025 World Juniors, the first time the USA won back-to-back golds at the premiere event for junior-aged players. Buium again played a vital role, providing a beautiful assist on the overtime game-winning goal. 

    The entire team wanted that game badly, but Buium had a burning desire to win hockey games. After the assist, the defender hesitated to join the celebratory scrum, focusing more on winning the game than celebrating. 

    "I just wanted to win that game so bad," Buium recalled. "I wasn't even thinking about a celebration. I just didn't want to lose."

    Buium's ultra-competitive spirit has been evident at every level of hockey. That intangible quality completes his profile as one of the top prospects in the NHL. 

    The Minnesota Wild are getting an elite talent. Buium affects the game just as much off the scoresheet as he does off it. He’s a defender who profiles as a top-pairing, play-driving defender. Most of all, Minnesota will be welcoming a winner. Time will tell if Buium can carry all of that to the NHL. For now, he's one of the best prospects in the league and is only improving.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 8
    • Thanks 2

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    The Athletic just released an article on Buium too, kind of centered around that lingering question of how long he might be at Denver.

    Quote

    That’s the biggest question for Buium, who many expect to join the Wild after this Pioneers season. And as much as Buium tries to stay present, from practices to his three classes (astronomy, theater, communications), he admits the NHL is on his mind.

    His goal first and foremost is to win another national title. But he’s also watching 90 percent of Wild games, and it’s more than just as a fan. It makes him smile.

    “You watch what they’re doing and where I can see myself,” Buium says. “I don’t think about it all the time, but sometimes I’ll watch the game — ‘How do I fit in this lineup, this system?’ It’s pretty cool. Sometimes I get lost — just amazed how they play. It’s been fun to watch and have more of a sense of pride for a team in the NHL.”

    His roommates will catch Buium watching 15-minute clips of NHL defensemen, including the Wild’s Brock Faber and the Detroit Red Wings’ Moritz Seider. 

    Wild comments:

    Quote

    Bombardir says Buium has improved on everything the team has asked him to this past year. His play away from the puck has gotten much better, from his gaps to his neutral-zone play to being predictable for his partner.

    “People talk about his offensive abilities and what he can do with the puck,” Bombardir says. “But the willingness he shows to defend and compete, I thought, were on great display at (World Juniors).”

    Denver Coach comments:

    Quote

     

    “He knows what he needs to play the 25 to 30 minutes,” Carle says. “He can pick his spots. He’s got an uncanny ability to do what the game requires. The adaptability of where he can do whatever the game calls for, whether he needs to be hard at defending or if he needs to add more juice, like he did against Finland offensively. He can just do it all.

    “That’s why I think his intelligence level, of doing what the game requires out of him, is like nothing I’ve ever seen.”

     

    Athletic writer comments:

    Quote

    “I try to always temper my expectations, not get carried away,” The Athletic’s prospects writer Scott Wheeler says. “But I truly believe Zeev is ready to come in and contribute this spring once his season is over at Denver and play in the playoffs and be a good player right away. Could he play 20 minutes a night next year? Zeev slides immediately on your second pairing. And is he immediately on one of your top two power plays? I absolutely think he’s capable of being that kind of player right away.”

     

    • Like 7
    • Thanks 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Here's what I'm really looking forward to: Both Buium and Faber seem to have that "it" factor. They are able to elevate to 120% of their normal play when the moment calls for it. Whether it's playing 30 minutes a game, or whether it's hitting that clutch goal or driving play. 

    Having 2 of those on a team is amazing and a reason I might not want to pair up Buium and Faber. Think about this: We could have 2 top pairing defensive units on a bargain pricetag. 

    Maybe it's overkill, but to get back to MNH03's idea of trading Rossi, Boldy and Faber for Thompson and Tuch. While the short term on this looks like it might be a win, and Thompson and Tuch would look good here, I think losing Faber would really be a detriment to our longterm success. 

    I still believe in the 3-4 hits on 2/3 drafts for longterm success. Getting a core of guys around the same age group with tutelage from an older draft. That's what we have in the '20-22 draft group. Sure, we traded for 2 of those guys and I didn't include that in my research, but having that group of 8ish guys from 3 drafts that can play a significant role tends to build championship caliber teams. 

    I'm ready to give this type of build a run. There's no guarantees that either is the way to go, but I like what I see from those drafts. 

    • Like 7
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, mnfaninnc said:

    Maybe it's overkill, but to get back to MNH03's idea of trading Rossi, Boldy and Faber for Thompson and Tuch. While the short term on this looks like it might be a win, and Thompson and Tuch would look good here, I think losing Faber would really be a detriment to our longterm success. 

    That's kind of where I came out. Short-term, the offense could see a little boost, but Boldy is at an age after which many NHLers see a productivity jump and his experience at 4 Nations could accelerate his development. If the Wild were to have those 3 players on the team next season, and they improve as many players of their ages do, they might be far more valuable than Tage Thompson & Tuch next season and for many seasons beyond.

    We likely would see more goals against by removing Faber from the Wild blue line as well. How they would be able to fill that vacancy would determine whether the Wild could win the deal. It feels like a risk making the trade even if the Wild get the best current player out of it. In 2 years, Boldy and Rossi could have better production than the combination of Tage & Tuch, and in that scenario, you let go of a top line RHD to get similar production from your top 6.

    I'm not arguing it's a horrible idea because there would be cap space created to replace Faber, I'm just uncertain how it would be used and if they could get a player to come in that would be just as productive. They would also want to extend Tuch before next year and that'd end up eating some of the cap space created.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I forgot to mention above that Faber also has cost certainty at $8.5M per year for the next 8 seasons after this. That may not look like an incredible deal today, but as the cap starts jumping and top line RHDs start getting $12M per year deals around 2027, it very well could look like the type of deal that helps teams become contenders. That Boldy deal should be an excellent example as well, assuming these 2 continue to improve.

    • Like 5
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 minutes ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    but Boldy is at an age after which many NHLers see a productivity jump

    I did a little research on all active players based on their points per game who, in their age 23 season, performed plus or minus .05 points per game of Boldy and Rossi to see how they did at ages 24-27.  Boldy so far this year is at .857 and Rossi .838.  Just over half (9/17) became point per game players by the ages of 24-26.  Here is a list of those players:

    • William Nylander
    • Elias Pettersson
    • Kevin Fiala
    • Jonathan Huberdeau
    • Mathew Barzal
    • Mark Stone
    • Patrick Kane
    • Jamie Benn
    • Sam Reinhart

    Of this list, only Nylander had a higher ppg than Boldy at .868.  Of course, the season is not over yet and Boldy could go down or up, but still some pretty good names on this list.  Of the 17 players, 4 dropped to below .75 points per game and lower: Max Domi, Sean Monahan, Jordan Staal, and Ondrej Palat.

    The other 4 players did not reach ppg status by 27 but still had some good years.  They are Brock Boeser, Max Pacioretty, Nikolaj Ehlers (ppq at 28), and Jordan Eberle.

    Also, Matthew Tkachuk did not make the list because his ppg at 23 was .768.  Probably could have added him since his ppg were in the range at 21 and 22.

    Better than 50 percent chance that Boldy and/or Rossi can get there.  

     

     

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 5
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    22 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    It is hard to play in the NHL at 19. This is especially true for a defender. He wouldn't even be eligible to play in the A because he's too young. What I am concerned about is his size. Has he taken to the gym like his brother? If the young phenom comes into the league, you can surely bet there are more than a few NHLers who will want to test him in the corners. 

    Faber came into the league at about 6'1" 20x. Even then, he learned last year he needed to add strength in the offseason, specifically upper body strength. He struggled against bigger forwards to pin them up against the boards. I think he's been better this season with that aspect. I believe the extra year in college helped Faber. I would not be surprised if it was the route that Buium decided to go...unless he has hit the gym hard!

    A few years ago, Guerin went to BC or BU to check on his college prospects. He had dinner with them, where I suppose he would be discussing their future. Both players likely didn't like what they heard because neither one was signed by us. I don't know if Guerin scared them off or if he even does this anymore. Since he's been given responsibility for team USA, maybe he doesn't even have time for that. But, I would think he'd be visiting Buium, perhaps when he's at one of the local universities playing and find out what Buium thinks. 

    Faber was easy to track since he is in our backyard. Have the Wild had their eyes on his progression for a lot of games this season? I really don't know. Roberts article was very good and encouraging, and I'm expecting that when Buium does come aboard, he will hit the ground running much like Faber did. My expectations are not tempered, though, I believe he'll start out on the 3rd pairing. 

    We know that Merrill wasn't fast enough to play vs. Dallas last time we were in the playoffs. I find it hard to believe he's able to gear up and play this time around. Chisholm could. I think Buium and Jiricek may make a fine pair, and I thought Chisholm and Jiricek playing together was the best pairing this season for Jiricek. 

    It would be nice not to have to burn an ELC year with Buium. Since I haven't watched a single game this year with him, I hope he has developed more physically. I think this TDL will give us a hint on what we are going to do. 

    Dermott cannot be traded or sent down, he must be put on waivers and probably sent back to Edmonton. Merrill can be sent down if we needed depth, but I think by April, Lambos will have caught him. Chisholm is young at $1m. I think if we see either he or Merrill sold or Dermott put on waivers, this will indicate that Guerin thinks Buium is coming after this year's tournament. 

     

    Good stuff here. Several folks are comparing Zeev to Faber which is natural for us on this sight, but I may contend that a better comparison may be Makar. They play a more similar game and may be closer to comps. I can only imagine what it would look like with a Faber and a Makar clone on the same team along with the rest of the Wild d-corps. Now that is what dreams are made of.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    22 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    It is hard to play in the NHL at 19. This is especially true for a defender. He wouldn't even be eligible to play in the A because he's too young. What I am concerned about is his size. Has he taken to the gym like his brother? If the young phenom comes into the league, you can surely bet there are more than a few NHLers who will want to test him in the corners. 

    Faber came into the league at about 6'1" 20x. Even then, he learned last year he needed to add strength in the offseason, specifically upper body strength. He struggled against bigger forwards to pin them up against the boards. I think he's been better this season with that aspect. I believe the extra year in college helped Faber. I would not be surprised if it was the route that Buium decided to go...unless he has hit the gym hard!

    A few years ago, Guerin went to BC or BU to check on his college prospects. He had dinner with them, where I suppose he would be discussing their future. Both players likely didn't like what they heard because neither one was signed by us. I don't know if Guerin scared them off or if he even does this anymore. Since he's been given responsibility for team USA, maybe he doesn't even have time for that. But, I would think he'd be visiting Buium, perhaps when he's at one of the local universities playing and find out what Buium thinks. 

    Faber was easy to track since he is in our backyard. Have the Wild had their eyes on his progression for a lot of games this season? I really don't know. Roberts article was very good and encouraging, and I'm expecting that when Buium does come aboard, he will hit the ground running much like Faber did. My expectations are not tempered, though, I believe he'll start out on the 3rd pairing. 

    We know that Merrill wasn't fast enough to play vs. Dallas last time we were in the playoffs. I find it hard to believe he's able to gear up and play this time around. Chisholm could. I think Buium and Jiricek may make a fine pair, and I thought Chisholm and Jiricek playing together was the best pairing this season for Jiricek. 

    It would be nice not to have to burn an ELC year with Buium. Since I haven't watched a single game this year with him, I hope he has developed more physically. I think this TDL will give us a hint on what we are going to do. 

    Dermott cannot be traded or sent down, he must be put on waivers and probably sent back to Edmonton. Merrill can be sent down if we needed depth, but I think by April, Lambos will have caught him. Chisholm is young at $1m. I think if we see either he or Merrill sold or Dermott put on waivers, this will indicate that Guerin thinks Buium is coming after this year's tournament. 

     

    Good stuff here. Several folks are comparing Zeev to Faber which is natural for us on this sight, but I may contend that a better comparison may be Makar. They play a more similar game and may be closer to comps. I can only imagine what it would look like with a Faber and a Makar clone on the same team along with the rest of the Wild d-corps. Now that is what dreams are made of.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    Here's what I'm really looking forward to: Both Buium and Faber seem to have that "it" factor. They are able to elevate to 120% of their normal play when the moment calls for it. Whether it's playing 30 minutes a game, or whether it's hitting that clutch goal or driving play. 

    Having 2 of those on a team is amazing and a reason I might not want to pair up Buium and Faber. Think about this: We could have 2 top pairing defensive units on a bargain pricetag. 

    Maybe it's overkill, but to get back to MNH03's idea of trading Rossi, Boldy and Faber for Thompson and Tuch. While the short term on this looks like it might be a win, and Thompson and Tuch would look good here, I think losing Faber would really be a detriment to our longterm success. 

    I still believe in the 3-4 hits on 2/3 drafts for longterm success. Getting a core of guys around the same age group with tutelage from an older draft. That's what we have in the '20-22 draft group. Sure, we traded for 2 of those guys and I didn't include that in my research, but having that group of 8ish guys from 3 drafts that can play a significant role tends to build championship caliber teams. 

    I'm ready to give this type of build a run. There's no guarantees that either is the way to go, but I like what I see from those drafts. 

    Let’s just play this out.  Let’s say Boldy is at 7mm a year, Rossi at 6mm and Faber for 8.5 for 21.5mm a year.  Tuch at 4.75 and Thompson at 7.1mm for a total of 11.85mm.  That’s 9.65 mm left we could spend on a top RHD dman or a really good dman for 5-6mm and another forward for 3-4mm.  I will take that trade all day as the team will get better by doing that.  Now get rid of Spurgeon for anything like a bag of pucks and we have another 7.5mm to spend to make even more of an impact. The time is now in the next 2-3 years to make a run and it won’t happen with Rossi, Faber or Boldy for what the team could be without them.  

    • Haha 1
    • Confused 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, mnhockeyfan03 said:

    Tuch at 4.75

    You’d be getting Tuch for next year only then BOOM with the cap explosion who knows what it’ll take to keep him. Don’t rush this cake. Boldy Rossi and Faber are rising stars/ great pieces. The value is coming. Tuch and Thompson aren’t going to put the Wild over the top. Maybe cycle back in a couple of years to put the icing on the cake. 

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Here's some stats from the last 4 years for the trade proposal since Boldy made his debut.

    Boldy- 259 games, 219 pts, TOI 3527 (minutes)

    .846 pts/gm and .062 pts/minute

    Rossi- 157 games, 88 pts, TOI 2188

    .561 pts/gm, .040 pts/min

    Tuch- 253 games, 219 pts, TOI 3441

    .866 pts/gm, .064 pts/min

    Thompson- 275 games, 266 pts, TOI 3726

    .967 pts/gm, .071 pts/min

    Just got to throw him in...

    Pominville, after traded to the Wild

    317 Games, 197 pts, TOI 5359

    .621 pts/gm, .037 pts/min

    So, to balance a little, lets assume everyone is getting 20 minutes a night.

    Boldy- 1.24 pts/game

    Rossi-.80 pts/game

    Tuch- 1.28 pts/game

    Thompson- 1.42 pts/game

    Pominville- .74 pts/game

    Lets also keep in mind that line mates can make a giant impact as even Dave Semenko scored 27 pts one year when teamed up with Gretzky.

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    44 minutes ago, Burnt Toast said:

    You’d be getting Tuch for next year only then BOOM with the cap explosion who knows what it’ll take to keep him. Don’t rush this cake. Boldy Rossi and Faber are rising stars/ great pieces. The value is coming. Tuch and Thompson aren’t going to put the Wild over the top. Maybe cycle back in a couple of years to put the icing on the cake. 

    I think tuch would sign a 3-4 year deal at 6mm.  Still a good value.   We need big top end forwards.  I don’t think Rossi or Boldy are those type of players in the West

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    45 minutes ago, BeanPole Harvester said:

    Here's some stats from the last 4 years for the trade proposal since Boldy made his debut.

    Boldy- 259 games, 219 pts, TOI 3527 (minutes)

    .846 pts/gm and .062 pts/minute

    Rossi- 157 games, 88 pts, TOI 2188

    .561 pts/gm, .040 pts/min

    Tuch- 253 games, 219 pts, TOI 3441

    .866 pts/gm, .064 pts/min

    Thompson- 275 games, 266 pts, TOI 3726

    .967 pts/gm, .071 pts/min

    Just got to throw him in...

    Pominville, after traded to the Wild

    317 Games, 197 pts, TOI 5359

    .621 pts/gm, .037 pts/min

    So, to balance a little, lets assume everyone is getting 20 minutes a night.

    Boldy- 1.24 pts/game

    Rossi-.80 pts/game

    Tuch- 1.28 pts/game

    Thompson- 1.42 pts/game

    Pominville- .74 pts/game

    Lets also keep in mind that line mates can make a giant impact as even Dave Semenko scored 27 pts one year when teamed up with Gretzky.

    Watch the Buffalo games and you will see why the trade makes sense.  Tuch and Thompson are what we need. Our PP is trash and they fix that.  Our top 6 has no size and they fix that.  Also they have speed and are RH.  

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 hours ago, mnhockeyfan03 said:

    Watch the Buffalo games and you will see why the trade makes sense.  Tuch and Thompson are what we need. Our PP is trash and they fix that.  Our top 6 has no size and they fix that.  Also they have speed and are RH.  

    I'm not arguing that this trade wouldn't make the Wild better this season or next season. I think you are underestimating how much better Boldy could be 2 years from now though. Tage and Tuch are near the top of their games. They are unlikely to improve. Boldy and Rossi both have a reasonable shot to be exceeding a point/game two or three years down the road.

    In the age range that Boldy and Rossi are now, Tuch was around .6 points per game. Tage Thompson was below .4 points per game. You are seeing the finished product with those guys, but assuming that Boldy and Rossi are not going to get better. They will get Boldy a legit wing on the opposite side and he might go for 90+ points next season.

    Over the next 5 years, Rossi has a chance to post 20% more points than Tuch. As I stated previously, I don't know that it's clear either way, but I suspect that Guerin will keep Boldy since he said he has a chance to be a 50 goal scorer in his prime.

    Boldy is surrounded right now by the best players the US has to offer, and he's taking notes. If he's the guy Guerin is hoping for, he will have his best summer of working out to help close the gap between his current game and where those veterans are at today.

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    13 hours ago, mnhockeyfan03 said:

    Now get rid of Spurgeon for anything like a bag of pucks and we have another 7.5mm to spend to make even more of an impact.

    Wild retaining or you think the team dealing the bag of pucks is going to take on the full $7.5m? Shedding Spurgeon doesn't just magically get you $7.5m unless you really sucker a team or throw in some other major capital with it.

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, M_Nels said:

    Wild retaining or you think the team dealing the bag of pucks is going to take on the full $7.5m? Shedding Spurgeon doesn't just magically get you $7.5m unless you really sucker a team or throw in some other major capital with it.

    I think Spurgeon and a 3rd and maybe a prospect gets them to take his salary. 

    • Thanks 1
    • Confused 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    I'm not arguing that this trade wouldn't make the Wild better this season or next season. I think you are underestimating how much better Boldy could be 2 years from now though. Tage and Tuch are near the top of their games. They are unlikely to improve. Boldy and Rossi both have a reasonable shot to be exceeding a point/game two or three years down the road.

    In the age range that Boldy and Rossi are now, Tuch was around .6 points per game. Tage Thompson was below .4 points per game. You are seeing the finished product with those guys, but assuming that Boldy and Rossi are not going to get better. They will get Boldy a legit wing on the opposite side and he might go for 90+ points next season.

    Over the next 5 years, Rossi has a chance to post 20% more points than Tuch. As I stated previously, I don't know that it's clear either way, but I suspect that Guerin will keep Boldy since he said he has a chance to be a 50 goal scorer in his prime.

    Boldy is surrounded right now by the best players the US has to offer, and he's taking notes. If he's the guy Guerin is hoping for, he will have his best summer of working out to help close the gap between his current game and where those veterans are at today.

    Understand your thinking and there is a chance Boldy and Rossi develop more but there is also a chance they don’t.  This is a true hockey trade.  We are going to be in win now mode the next 2-3 year deal in Kaps prime and don’t have time to wait for guys to develop or we waste his talent.  We get better for the next 2-3 years for sure and we get RHD speed guys who can play in the top 6 and score

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    18 hours ago, Up North Guy said:

    Good stuff here. Several folks are comparing Zeev to Faber which is natural for us on this sight, but I may contend that a better comparison may be Makar. They play a more similar game and may be closer to comps. I can only imagine what it would look like with a Faber and a Makar clone on the same team along with the rest of the Wild d-corps. Now that is what dreams are made of.

    I agree with this but I don’t think anyone wants to actually say it for fear they will be wrong. Buiums skating is good but it isn’t like Makars. I’ve seen comparisons to Adam Fox too.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, Mateo3xm said:

    I agree with this but I don’t think anyone wants to actually say it for fear they will be wrong. Buiums skating is good but it isn’t like Makars. I’ve seen comparisons to Adam Fox too.

    I’ll raise you a Quinn Hughes and that’s my final offer…

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    30 minutes ago, Mateo3xm said:

    Buiums skating is good but it isn’t like Makars.

    Please let's not start comparing this college hockey player to the best NHL d-man.  Please?

    Or am I the one who doesn't get it.  It's a fan page so we come here for an bottomless well of hope.  The line between hope and delusion blurs when Z Bu gets compared to Makar.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    22 minutes ago, Mateo3xm said:

    I agree with this but I don’t think anyone wants to actually say it for fear they will be wrong. Buiums skating is good but it isn’t like Makars.

    I haven't said Makar, and won't unless Buium actually hits point per game status in the NHL. I have mentioned Heiskanen a few times because the way he whirls around and controls the game when he's healthy for the Stars is the way that Buium has been described by writers. I believe Heiskanen is a little longer than Makar or Quinn Hughes, and a little below on scoring, particularly this year.

    Heiskanen did tally 127 points in 150 games the prior to seasons though--roughly a 68 point pace per 80 games. The Wild have never had a defenseman come close to 70 points in a season--I believe their highest so far is 51.

    Makar has typically been on his own level.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 hours ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    I haven't said Makar, and won't unless Buium actually hits point per game status in the NHL. I have mentioned Heiskanen a few times because the way he whirls around and controls the game when he's healthy for the Stars is the way that Buium has been described by writers. I believe Heiskanen is a little longer than Makar or Quinn Hughes, and a little below on scoring, particularly this year.

    Heiskanen did tally 127 points in 150 games the prior to seasons though--roughly a 68 point pace per 80 games. The Wild have never had a defenseman come close to 70 points in a season--I believe their highest so far is 51.

    Makar has typically been on his own level.

    I did not mean to compare Zeev to Makar as they both are right now. I was referring to Makar pre-NHL. Also, from what i have seen, Zeev has improved his skating from last year.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, Up North Guy said:

    I did not mean to compare Zeev to Makar as they both are right now. I was referring to Makar pre-NHL. Also, from what i have seen, Zeev has improved his skating from last year.

    This is exactly what I’ve been saying. I’m simply comparing their points in college hockey. Nowhere do I see people saying he’s going to be the next Makar who is obviously the best dman in the nhl

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 hours ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    Please let's not start comparing this college hockey player to the best NHL d-man.  Please?

    Or am I the one who doesn't get it.  It's a fan page so we come here for an bottomless well of hope.  The line between hope and delusion blurs when Z Bu gets compared to Makar.

    Like I said above. He put up better numbers than Cale Makar, Quinn Hughes, Adam Fox and Brian Leetch as a freshman. No other NCAA defenseman freshman has put up that many points before. I’m having a hard time finding any other defenseman in history that has scored more than 53pts in a season and that was Matt Carle in his 3rd year in 05-06. You absolutely can compare his points production to all of those players because he did it. 

    Not one time did I say he was going to be the next Makar. For some reason you seem to be interpreting it as such, even though it’s pretty obvious I’m not. I could just see you telling all your friends about this comment section you’re a part of where people were saying Buium is the next Makar. I haven’t heard one person say that but you seem to want to hear that.

    Once again, his skating is not the same as Makars but his skill and especially his hockey IQ is elite. It’s certainly possible he could become a star in the NHL but obviously we will have to wait and see.

    Also something to think about is that three other players were picked before Makar in his draft year

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 hours ago, mnhockeyfan03 said:

    Understand your thinking and there is a chance Boldy and Rossi develop more but there is also a chance they don’t.  This is a true hockey trade.  We are going to be in win now mode the next 2-3 year deal in Kaps prime and don’t have time to wait for guys to develop or we waste his talent.  We get better for the next 2-3 years for sure and we get RHD speed guys who can play in the top 6 and score

    The thing with this trade is it is also hypothetical.  I have looked at Buffalo's dirt sheets and have seen nothing that they are even interested in trading either one of these two.  So that is problem one.

    I posted earlier a list of players that scored less than Boldy at the same age and it is a pretty impressive list.  More than half of them became point per game players.  I also looked through to see how many of these players got traded and when.  Besides players that said that they would not sign with their teams, (Tkachuk, Jordan Stall,) the only player I found was Fiala who was traded to the Wild for Granlund and then again from the Wild when they could not afford him.  Also, Sam Reinhart was traded from Buffalo to Florida after his age 25 season in a contract year. 

    Teams just don't trade 23-year-old players that score at the rate that Rossi and Boldy do.  Then throw a 22-year-old defenseman who, whether we think he is our best defender or not, the coaches seem to think he is with his playing time.  We can debate all day whether this makes us a better team or not.  I personally can't say for sure it would even this year.  But until the trade is made it is just hypothetical. 

     

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...