Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • Will Nico Sturm's Faceoffs Be A Game-Changer For the Wild?


    Image courtesy of Eakin Howard - Imagn Images
    Tony Abbott

    Is the Minnesota Wild's long State-of-Hockey-wide faceoff nightmare over?

    Since Mikko Koivu and Eric Staal left St. Paul after the 2019-20 season, the team went from being middle-of-the-pack clubs in the NHL to one of the worst. Far from the dominant faceoff force they were when Koivu was at his peak, the Wild have been struggling not to be bottom-five in the league.

    The results over the last five seasons speak for themselves.

    Minnesota Wild Faceoff Percentage, by year:

    2020-21: 46.5% (28th of 31)
    2021-22: 46.7% (27th of 32)
    2022-23: 47.7% (26th)
    2023-24: 47.3% (26th)
    2024-25: 46.7% (27th)

    You can (and we have) argued that this hasn't mattered in the grand scheme of things. The Wild made the playoffs in four of those five seasons, and while you can shrug that off due to their lack of postseason success, they're 11th in the NHL over that time with a .618 points percentage in the regular season. That's gotta mean something. It is also notable that the teams tied for first in points percentage are the Carolina Hurricanes (third in faceoffs over that time) and the Colorado Avalanche (who are 26th). 

    Still, that hasn't stopped faceoffs from being a point of consternation for Wild fans and media. There are times, especially in the playoffs, when they really bit Minnesota. For example, the Dallas Stars' power play ran roughshod on the penalty kill during the 2023 playoffs. The Stars won a whopping 70% of their draws on the man advantage.

    That's why Nico Sturm, a fourth-line center, is going to be getting some major attention coming into the season. Sturm was a career 51.3% in the dot during his first stint in Minnesota -- one of just four Wild centers to take 200-plus draws since 2019-20 to be above 50%. However, his faceoff legend really took off in San Jose, where he won an incredible 58.6% of his opportunities over nearly three full seasons.

    That kind of percentage can pull Minnesota much closer to 50% on the season, as long as centers like Joel Eriksson Ek and Marco Rossi can stay not-too-far below that level. It gives the Wild some faceoff credibility, but how much will that really matter? Now might be a good time to temper our expectations a bit.

    Sturm shines the brightest in the faceoff dot at even-strength, with a 59.0% mark over 1,800 even-strength attempts in the past three seasons. That's tied with Jake Evans for the highest percentage in the league for anyone with over 1,500 faceoffs. But even-strength is probably when faceoffs matter the least. These aren't situational draws, the have-to-have-it moments. They're at times when possession changes quickly, and if you don't get the puck when it drops, you'll likely have it back soon enough.

    Especially for a fourth-liner.

    If Sturm was a top-line center, giving first crack at the puck to Kirill Kaprizov and Matt Boldy at even-strength? Maybe that's a slightly bigger advantage. But Sturm's going to be winning possessions for players like Yakov Trenin and Marcus Johansson. We're not talking about a lot of extra goals coming from that.

    No, where you'd hope Sturm provides that advantage is on the penalty kill, where the stakes of winning a faceoff are higher. And Sturm's not bad at that. He's above water with a 50.5% win rate in 279 faceoffs. With that said, using 200 shorthanded draws as the cutoff, that only ranks 15th of 67 players. Again, not bad! Pretty good! But maybe not a game-changer.

    Or maybe even a series changer. The Wild's last three postseasons (all of which came after trading Sturm) have seen them go 40-for-106 in the faceoff dot on the penalty kill. That's 38.3%, almost as bad as it gets. But we're only talking about 35 draws, on average, in a six-game series. What's the difference between going 38.3% over 35 draws and 50.5%?

    Five faceoffs. 18 instead of 13. And that’s if Sturm took every draw. 

    Moreover, that's if Sturm's regular-season dominance on a last-place team is transferrable to high-stakes playoff games. We haven't seen much to suggest that's the case. Admittedly, we're dealing with small sample sizes, but Sturm has taken 115 faceoffs during the postseason, during stints with the Wild, Colorado Avalanche, and Florida Panthers. What's his record on those?

    43 wins, 74 losses. A 37.4% record.

    Look at the breakdown below.

    Nico Sturm, Playoff Faceoff%, by team:

    MIN: 40.0% (6-for-15)
    COL: 30.8% (12-for-39)
    FLA: 41.0% (25-for-61)

    That's pretty significantly worse than the Wild's 46.7% mark in their past three postseasons. The percentage doesn't get better when you account for Sturm being a penalty killer, a role where faceoffs can be much harder (and more crucial) to win. Sturm won just eight of his 24 shorthanded draws with Florida in the postseason last year, and 11 of the 33 he's had in his career. That's a 33.3% win rate that's... yup, worse than the Wild as a team over that time.

    The good news is, being bad in the faceoff dot didn't stop Sturm from effectively killing penalties. He allowed just two goals in about 22 minutes, which is a 5.56 goals against per hour that is less than half the rate the Wild have given up in their past three playoffs (12.04 goals against per hour). Sturm is a big body who can defend well, which will be an upgrade over the competitive but physically overmatched Freddy Gaudreau.

    Sturm is going to help, but it might not be exactly as we think. His role as a fourth-liner, combined with his elite stats in San Jose, not following him elsewhere, makes it difficult to believe that he'll solve the Wild's faceoff woes. But just as we're skeptical that Sturm can fix the Wild in the dot, we're skeptical that this is much of an issue to begin with.

    Remember: the Sharks were one of the worst teams in the NHL when Sturm was winning 60% of his draws, and the Wild have been a consistent playoff team while struggling in the dot. What Sturm can offer with his defense and speed once the play actually begins will be much more important than anything that happens the moment the puck drops. 

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    Look, Sturm is a 4th line player, he's not much to get excited about! But, he should provide some jam to that line, a guy you can throw out for a crucial face-off at critical times, and hopefully be good killing penalties.  Overall I think its an upgrade over what we've had in that spot the last 3 years.  

    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I don't think Nico Sturm is going to win a draw in game seven of the Stanley Cup to set up Kirill for an open shot to win the game.  

    However, I do think that Nico can teach the rest of the Wild faceoff guys a few things that might improve the percentage a few points.  In a season ten to twenty more draw wins might be the difference of making the playoffs as a Wild Card and making the playoffs as a home team.  

    • Like 6
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Quote

    the Sharks were one of the worst teams in the NHL when Sturm was winning 60% of his draws

    This. Teams weren't really getting up to play hard against the Sharks. We'll see how he fares against central teams competing for points. Hopefully he can stay above 50%, but if his penalty kill and playoff percentages are an indication, against better talent and when it matters, he may be much worse.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Love me some Sturm-a-lurm-a-ding-dong but when a fringe NHL journeyman on his second tour with the Wild becomes the off-season addition who's FO% and PK skills are what will change the trajectory of this one-and-done bunch of old's, then you know it's another rinse repeat year for the bill Guerin Wild.

    bill is all-in on Judd's pick's now.  Nothing else to see here.

    Prediction: if this season goes sideways/trends down, Judd get's fired during the season as a distraction and to make fans feel like bill is paying attention and doing something.  Hey Zeev, Jiri, Wall-E and Yurov, no pressure.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Any improvement is a positive 

    Faceoff are also a important part of the game when used correctly 

    Sturm will be measured by his PK performance 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think we should take a look at the Sturm addition comparatively. Let's compare Sturm, to, well Sturm and those who have been in his spot since. 

    I do remember a statistic in Sturm's final year about how stingy a 4th line they were, not being scored against in 5 on 5 for a long part to start the season. At the time, we also had the 3rd line of Foligno-Ek-Greenway, and that was a beast of a line. 

    This was followed by the Deweys and Shaw, and then followed by Grape Knuts and the wingman. Both of these 4th lines provided little in offensive help, though watching Duhaime was entertaining. We went with small and speed in the middle of these lines and it never had the defensive affect, or really the offensive effect that Sturm's lines had.

    It's not just his faceoff wins that set him apart, we have missed him in the lineup ever since he left. It's his speed/size ratio. It's his ability to punish defenders in the offensive zone. It's his ability to defend well. We may not think much of his linemates in Trenin and Johansson, but they are tested NHLers, not AHL graduates on their first gig. 

    So, yes I think there will be a difference. A good difference. It's not needle changing, but it will help. I think you'll get more of an offensive chip in with Sturm's line. Also, it should be mentioned that he was playing 3rd line minutes in San Jose. Sturm is a solid pickup for $1m. But that's just it, it's only $1m.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    I think we should take a look at the Sturm addition comparatively. Let's compare Sturm, to, well Sturm and those who have been in his spot since. 

    I do remember a statistic in Sturm's final year about how stingy a 4th line they were, not being scored against in 5 on 5 for a long part to start the season. At the time, we also had the 3rd line of Foligno-Ek-Greenway, and that was a beast of a line. 

    This was followed by the Deweys and Shaw, and then followed by Grape Knuts and the wingman. Both of these 4th lines provided little in offensive help, though watching Duhaime was entertaining. We went with small and speed in the middle of these lines and it never had the defensive affect, or really the offensive effect that Sturm's lines had.

    It's not just his faceoff wins that set him apart, we have missed him in the lineup ever since he left. It's his speed/size ratio. It's his ability to punish defenders in the offensive zone. It's his ability to defend well. We may not think much of his linemates in Trenin and Johansson, but they are tested NHLers, not AHL graduates on their first gig. 

    So, yes I think there will be a difference. A good difference. It's not needle changing, but it will help. I think you'll get more of an offensive chip in with Sturm's line. Also, it should be mentioned that he was playing 3rd line minutes in San Jose. Sturm is a solid pickup for $1m. But that's just it, it's only $1m.

    I just can't see NoJo on the 4th line. He was bad in the top six. He would be a disaster on the 4th line. If he has to be in the lineup I would guess 3rd line.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 minutes ago, Up North Guy said:

    I just can't see NoJo on the 4th line. He was bad in the top six. He would be a disaster on the 4th line. If he has to be in the lineup I would guess 3rd line.

    I'm not so sure, here. If they can get possession and shovel the puck to Johansson, he can dance around with his speed on the perimeter, giving the straight liners time to rumble down the middle of the ice to get open just as he's circling the net. 2 outcomes then happen, a nice pass to one of them in the middle, or he eats the puck into the corner. I'd like to think that outcome #1 happens most of the time, but I am ready to see a solid meal of eating the puck in the corner! But, both of those trucks coming into the scrum can move some bodies. 

    Johansson isn't little, he's listed at over 200 lbs. making that line pretty beefy. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    22 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    or really the offensive effect that Sturm's lines had.

    Hope springs eternal and so does revisionist history.  Sturm Nasty is just a more German Freddy G.  Not better, not worse just more German.  Not hating on Sturm-turd, just can't get behind the hype.  Bro is a......fine 4th line C.  Much like Fred was.  He couldn't beat out Fred a couple years ago, and now he's a cheaper free agent option that allows us to unload Fred's $2.5M contract mistake.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    n just as he's circling the net.

    More revisionist history.  We all know Nojo's zone entry involves him stopping at the top of the circle on the wall, and then throwing the puck back to the blue line so no one make contact with him.  If he brings it into the zone behind the net a single time this season I'll brush Nordy's pelt.

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    38 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    2 outcomes then happen, a nice pass to one of them in the middle, or he eats the puck into the corner

    Fixed it for ya:

    2 outcomes then happen, a turnover as the defense pinches, or a turnover as he passes to the opposing team to avoid contact.

     

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    17 hours ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    More revisionist history.  We all know Nojo's zone entry involves him stopping at the top of the circle on the wall, and then throwing the puck back to the blue line so no one make contact with him.  If he brings it into the zone behind the net a single time this season I'll brush Nordy's pelt.

    Get that brush ready. He made several trips behind the net last season, it's not revisionist history. And the result? More often than not he ate the puck in the corner, sometimes making it up to the side boards. He did stop some on the side boards and tried to button hook, but it didn't look like a button hook. It looked more like he'd stop and then decide to play soccer with the puck, or merely drop it back to the non-existent teammate at the point. But, Johansson's favorite move is to skate into the zone and circle around the perimeter hoping for a pass. 

    And, according to last season, looks like Johansson has found some stickem to keep the stick in his hands. That dropped stick thing was greatly reduced. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...