Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • Why Is Matt Boldy Being Projected As A Top-5 Player?


    Image courtesy of Matt Blewett-USA TODAY Sports
    Tony Abbott

    Our friends at Evolving-Hockey have released their Goals Above Replacement projections for the upcoming season. GAR (which can be converted into Wins and Standings Points) is their all-in-one metric to measure overall player value, and it passes the sniff test. Last year's top-3 had Nathan MacKinnon, Auston Matthews, and Connor McDavid in their top, and MVP candidates like Nikita Kucherov, Quinn Hughes, and David Pastrnak.

    If you look at the names populating the top-10 for their GAR projections next year, you'd go, That sounds about right.

    Except in one spot.

    GAR Projections, 2024-25:

    1. Connor McDavid, EDM: 21.2
    2. Auston Matthews, TOR: 18.8
    3. Nathan MacKinnon, COL: 17.9
    4. MATT BOLDY, MIN: 15.4
    5. Jason Robinson, DAL: 14.8
    6. Kirill Kaprizov, MIN: 14.7
    7. Adam Fox, NYR: 14.5
    8. David Pastrnak: 14.0
    T-9. Quinn Hughes, Jack Hughes, Jesper Bratt: 13.4

    Holy smokes.

    The Evolving-Hockey Brain Trust has Matt Boldy as the fourth-highest-projected skater in hockey next season. We're talking better than Kirill Kaprizov, though there's not much room between the two star wingers. We're talking about blowing past the top names at his position: Elias Petterson, Matthew Tkachuk, Mikko Rantanen, and Kucherov.

    It's a lofty pedestal to put Boldy on, but he arguably had his strongest season yet in an already brilliant career. In 75 games, Boldy potted 29 goals and 69 points, landing around the top 50 in the NHL in scoring in his age-22 season.

    Still, those point totals have him a long way from catching up to Kaprizov's scoring stratosphere. Kaprizov finished the season with 17 more goals and 27 more points than Boldy, playing in the same number of games. That gap between Kaprizov and Boldy is a big reason why Evolving-Hockey is projecting him to join his rank next season, which will undoubtedly catch Wild fans' attention.

    It's surprising, even for someone who has long been high on Boldy. But it's understandable why their models would be bold in projecting success for the 2019 first-rounder.

    While Boldy isn't in that borderline MVP range yet, he's already just a step underneath it. His GAR numbers over the past three seasons are among some of the top names in the past three years. With 43.1 GAR since his debut, Boldy ranks 36th in the NHL in the past three years. Boldy's numbers put him in the range of forwards like Steven Stamkos (44.7), Brayden Point (42.9), and Sebastian Aho (41.0).

    Also, Boldy didn't even make his NHL debut until halfway through the 2021-22 season. Looking at his GAR on a per-minute basis, and Boldy is 21st among 271 forwards who've logged 2500-plus minutes in the past three seasons. 

    Things were even better last season, as Boldy finished last year with 18.1 GAR (worth about 5.7 points in the standings), 20th in the NHL. For what it's worth, that's only nine spots behind Kaprizov on the leaderboard.

    Okay, so Boldy rates pretty well in GAR. That still doesn't explain why he's projected to launch himself in the top 10. What's going on here?

    Part of it is age, of course. If a player consistently crushes it at ages 20, 21, and 22, it makes all the sense in the world that he'd still be on the upswing at 23. When looking at players with similar numbers at ages 20 and 21 last year, we found that the ones that took The Leap usually did so around age 23. Boldy has some history on his side. 

    The other thing Boldy has on his side is that he has some of the strongest defensive value for a forward in the NHL, according to Evolving-Hockey's metrics. Showing strong defense at a young age is one of the strongest predictors they have for a young player looking to enter into stardom.

    Boldy's Even Strength Defense has been worth 11.2 GAR over the past three seasons, which ranks eighth among all forwards in that time. How strong of a predictor is this? Look at Jason Robertson, who is fourth on that list. The 2022-23 saw him rack up 46 goals and 109 points... at age 23. 

    Things figure to be no different this season. In the Evolving-Hockey projections, Boldy and Robertson have the highest projection for GAR from their Even Strength Defense. 

    image.png

    Robertson honestly feels like a great comparable for Boldy. Forget about elite speed; they both might not even be average skaters. However, their size and hands mean they can protect the puck through the neutral and offensive zones, and of course, both can rip the puck.

    The height of Robertson's young career came alongside elite scoring support from Joe Pavelski and Roope Hintz. Boldy got to ride shotgun with Kaprizov and Joel Eriksson Ek down the stretch last season and possibly will do the same next year. If that happens, Boldy could get Robertson-type numbers. 

    Evolving-Hockey is high on that possibility, at least, projecting Boldy to finish sixth in Even Strength Offense GAR and 12th in Power Play Offense. It will be hard to drive offense that much, with hands like Boldy's, without coming away with piles of points.

    A small subset of fans saw Boldy fail to take a giant jump in his third season and aren't impressed. For all the reasons stated above, that's just silly. The truth is, Boldy has established himself as one of the league's most underrated players. His greatness will soon become undeniable if he can deliver on Evolving-Hockey's projections.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    6 hours ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    nhl network just ranked top 10 WINGS in league

     97 ranked #7 just after Jason Robertson

    1 Kucherov

    2 Tkachuk

    3 Rantanen

    4 Pasta

    5 Panarin

    6 Robertson

    7 Kap

    8 Nylander

    9 Reinhart

    10 Marner

    no centers included:
    mcdavid, Matthews, mckin, draisatl, Crosby, barkov, aho, pettersson. 
    Kap is arguably top 20 imo, but not top 10

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    41 minutes ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    1 Kucherov

    2 Tkachuk

    3 Rantanen

    4 Pasta

    5 Panarin

    6 Robertson

    7 Kap

    8 Nylander

    9 Reinhart

    10 Marner

    no centers included:
    mcdavid, Matthews, mckin, draisatl, Crosby, barkov, aho, pettersson. 
    Kap is arguably top 20 imo, but not top 10

    I wouldn't give bean counters at NHL Network or talking heads on TV too much weight.  These idiots gave Bedard the Calder at a -80 or whatever.  It's a fashion show in the media.

    Now a players ranking by players would be something.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 8/17/2024 at 11:53 AM, mnfaninnc said:

    I have to disagree with you on this. Short is not small, short and thin is small. Beckman was 6'2" but was small because he barely crossed 190lbs. You could see it in his board battles in the N, he never went into the boards, he went close and tried to pick pucks out. He simply wasn't strong enough. You see it in O'Rourke, too, who is just too small for the type of game he wants to play, even at 6'2". He's only in the 190s, and he needs to be around 210 for his game.

    For that matter, Brodin also falls into this category, but due to his elite skating and stick work he is able to play at that weight.

    While Kaprizov is under 6', he is thick, not small. If Rossi can come in between 195-200, he will also be thick not small. Those guys have tremendous leverage on the larger players and can bump them off balance. It's also hard to clear a guy out when your crosscheck hits them in the top of the back. Those tend to get seen and penalized. 

    My conclusion is that every one of our prospects needs to get on my bulk up plan. I don't know how to do it, but I know where the results should be! Lesson is this: Not bulking up means you want a career in the A. At 10% of the salary, I'm betting that's not really where they want to be. Last time I remember hearing players, I've never heard anyone say their dream is to play in the A! Well, then, do what you need to do to get to the N!

    I don't disagree with you.  I'm saying that having too many of those small stature players on the same line starts to be an issue.  Players have less wingspan, so less reach and less chances to disrupt a pass, more open ice, less body to screen a goalie, etc.

    I'm not saying that shorter players can't play in the league.  I'm saying that putting too many of one line can create certain problems that the other team can use to make that line less effective and more of a liability.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    18 hours ago, Sam said:

    Hey ODC, let’s say you have an 8 oz cup filled with 4 oz of water. Would you say that it is half empty or half full?

    That might be a better question if the cup was filled with 4 oz of beer. ODC might say it's empty and finishes it off! Heck, he might even say the 8 oz full glass is empty and finishes it off! 

    I'm a pessimist by nature so chalk me up to the half empty crowd.

    • Haha 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, raithis said:

    I'm not saying that shorter players can't play in the league. 

    I see your point and would like to also clarify: We should have only 3 "smaller" players on the team. Now, which 3 should they be?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...