Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness
  • Where Does Declan Chisholm Fit In With the Wild?


    Image courtesy of Marc DesRosiers-USA TODAY Sports
    Luke Sims

    Declan Chisholm has the second-highest points per game among Minnesota Wild defensemen behind rookie phenom Brock Faber. However, Chisholm has only played in two NHL games so far this season for the Winnipeg Jets, where he recorded a single assist. And now the 24-year-old left-shot defender is the newest member of the Minnesota blueline. 

    Who is Chisholm, and what does he bring to the Wild? 

    Chisholm improved his point totals in the four years he played with the Peterborough Petes. He topped out with 69 points in 59 games during his double-overage season or two years after he was drafted. He translated his offensive success to the AHL with Manitoba Moose almost immediately. 

    The Bowmanville, Ont. born Chisholm has played in 146 AHL games in four seasons with Manitoba. Winnipeg’s fifth-round pick in 2018 has recorded a respectable 0.69 points per game. 

    Chisholm has only played in four NHL games, but his underlying metrics from his AHL days are positive. 

    The 6-foot-1, 190 lbs. defender had spent a lot of time sitting in Winnipeg’s press box as the extra defenseman. The Jets had a logjam with their depth defenseman and put Chisholm on waivers on Monday.

    Chisholm has a unique opportunity in Minnesota. He’s a restricted free agent at the end of this season, so he’ll be motivated to prove he deserves another contract. 

    The Wild are missing Jared Spurgeon but have eight defensemen on the roster, meaning John Hynes has a decision to make. He’s not going to remove Jonas Brodin, Jacob Middleton, and Faber from the lineup anytime soon. Veteran Zach Bogosian has been playing well lately and deserves a spot in the lineup. 

    Therefore, Hynes will be choosing between Jon Merrill, Dakota Mermis, Alex Goligoski, and Chisholm. None of the three incumbent defensemen have been playing well. Goligoski has produced points, but that doesn’t make up for the gaffes in his own end. Merrill doesn’t provide much besides nostalgia for Hynes, who coached him in New Jersey. Mermis’s inconsistent plays have caused him to spend more time in the press box than on the ice lately. 

    So, where does Chisholm fit in? 

    The Wild can use the All-Star break to evaluate what they want to do with their defensive core. Chisholm could fit into a variety of roles. The young defenseman has experience on the power play and could fit into the PP2 roles that Goligoski had occupied. Hynes could also pair Chisholm with Goligoski for a puck-moving third pair. 

    Minnesota’s decision to acquire Chisholm off of waivers is interesting because the Wild also just picked up Will Butcher in a trade. They now have a good amount of capable NHL defensemen. Chisholm could debut as soon as Minnesota’s next game on February 7th versus the Chicago Blackhawks.

    The Wild picked him up for a reason. Chisholm will get his chance.

    All stats and data via HockeyDb, Elite Prospects, and Daily Faceoff unless otherwise noted.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    In the Russo/Smith mailbag, they mentioned that their league sources, multiple teams placed claims on Chisholm but the Wild (27th in the league) were the highest.

    Since we grabbed him off waivers, that means we'll get to see him skate with the big boys.  Will be interesting to see how he fits, and if we attempt to resign him.

    But it's waivers...meant to give these fringe guys a shot to stay at the dance instead of skating in the AHL, so not expecting much impact.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    He’s going to be motivated, he’s young, and we have a lot of need on defense. He’s also free. It’d be nice for him to earn a spot, develop, and resign. These are the kinds of small additions that add up and make a difference. We’ve tried similar moves on offense. I hope this works out. This move still leaves room to potentially add another D for next year.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    To me, this is much like the Butcher trade, depth for an outgoing defensive vet. For starters, I believe Mermis is heading to the minors and I doubt he'll be claimed. But, the writing is on the wall, Goligoski and Merrill are on their way out. I expect Hunt to be brought back up as well after the break since Lucchini and The Wall headed back to Iowa. 

    It wouldn't surprise me at all if Goligoski and Merrill do not start with the Wild after the break. 

    I did get to read a take from the Winnipeg media. They are still pushing the narrative of Hartman intentionally highsticking Perfetti. And they are completely downplaying the egregious crosschecking that Dillon performed on Kaprizov akin to surgery. They also pointed out that this rivalry is getting heated and half accused Guerin for taking Chisholm out of spite, their words were "an organizational face wash." 

    I'm not enamored with Chisholm's size, but it is better than Goligoski's. This is the type of defender that Brackett and perhaps even Guerin like. A puck moving defender with decent size somewhere in the 6'-6'2" area. 190 seems light for me, but a good offseason should help. 

    Does this signal anything? Maybe. I think with waiver rules, Guerin can't just trade him, and he has to remain on the roster for at least 30 days (Mr. Cheatachu?). But, it signals going after young candidates for our defense, something I'd endorse. I'd pair him coming out of the break with Bogosian. And, I'd pair Hunt with Middleton. 

    For the time being, Goligoski and Merrill can eat nachos and look at Prosser pictures up in his box. I suppose this is a nice way of saying, "you are not in our plans for the future" instead of bag skating them. I would think that a guy like Goligoski would want to play at this age, or at least win. He may be close to waiving his NMC (hope, hope). But, if so, I would like to see him back as a player development guy in the future.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 minutes ago, Burnt Toast said:

    It’d be nice for him to earn a spot, develop, and resign.

    With the way the CBA works, essentially, Chisholm has little leverage and the resigning will be completely the Wild's decision. It will be cheap too.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    49 minutes ago, Citizen Strife said:

    It's a no-risk move for little money, even if he re-signs.  I just hope he proves to be a better option than what the Wild have right now. 

    I'd be real disappointed if he's slower than Goligoski/Merrill.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, mnfaninnc said:

    I'd be real disappointed if he's slower than Goligoski/Merrill.

    I don't think he'll be slower, but he's kind of a bargain Goligoski based upon what I read(and makes sense given that he was waived).

    A little bigger than Goligoski, and a guy who often makes good reads to collect assists, but isn't physical and doesn't have stand out skills. It doesn't sound like skating is a deficiency, but likely not above average. He's getting closer to his prime hockey years, and in the right system, he could maybe be a decent 3rd line guy.

    Probably a good move to push Mermis back to the AHL with a younger(24 compared to 30) replacement who's likely just as good, if not better.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, mnfaninnc said:

    I did get to read a take from the Winnipeg media. They are still pushing the narrative of Hartman intentionally highsticking Perfetti. And they are completely downplaying the egregious crosschecking that Dillon performed on Kaprizov akin to surgery. They also pointed out that this rivalry is getting heated and half accused Guerin for taking Chisholm out of spite, their words were "an organizational face wash." 

    I'm not enamored with Chisholm's size, but it is better than Goligoski's. This is the type of defender that Brackett and perhaps even Guerin like. A puck moving defender with decent size somewhere in the 6'-6'2" area. 190 seems light for me, but a good offseason should help. 

    Does this signal anything? Maybe. I think with waiver rules, Guerin can't just trade him, and he has to remain on the roster for at least 30 days (Mr. Cheatachu?). But, it signals going after young candidates for our defense, something I'd endorse. I'd pair him coming out of the break with Bogosian. And, I'd pair Hunt with Middleton. 

    RE: Waivers rule - you are correct, that prior to being able to trade a player you picked up off waivers (this season) we would have to offer him to the other teams that made waivers claims prior to being able to trade him.  The russo/smith mailbag mentioned that there were 'multiple' claims on him, so it's unlikely (especially if his play warrants it) that he's going to be flipped.

    RE: Organizational Facewash - If we are to believe it, multiple teams made claims on him, the bust guess is they thought they'd be able to slip him through because everyone wasnt paying attention due to the all-star break.  That said, I'm assume you're talking about the Paul Friesen article?  Because even WPG fans consider that guy a hack...

    Personally, I don't like the WPG jets, and their fans are some of the most annoying to me (along with the COL fans), but I think this is a case of an NHL player being available rather than the Hurricanes retaliating by offer sheeting Jesperi Kotkaniemi with a $20 signing bonus because the habs offer sheeted Aho (#20).  My read is that Chis is too good for the AHL, and the Wild need a warm body rather than want to poke at WPG.

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    More kicks at the can with young guys coming through the Wild's system. If they don't cost much or are under appreciated, there is more potential upside than chance of failure.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    18 hours ago, Protec said:

    More kicks at the can with young guys coming through the Wild's system. If they don't cost much or are under appreciated, there is more potential upside than chance of failure.

    Could this mean there is a shakeup coming with the cavalry on defense? Perhaps a player like Peart being on the move? Of course, we'd have to see if Chisholm is a legit prospect/player first.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...