Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • What Will Be On the Wild (Actual) Christmas Wishlist?


    Image courtesy of Nick Wosika-Imagn Images
    Kalisha Turnipseed

    The Minnesota Wild almost have their roster set. We can look forward to what the season may hold by December. This summer, general manager Bill Guerin and the fanbase didn't get their Christmas. Everyone was looking forward to free agency and even expected the team to make a big trade. That didn't happen as fans feel unfulfilled

    The Wild can bring Christmas to fans, who need a miracle on West 7th Street. That will be a welcome recovery from a lackluster free agency. They need to establish a wishlist that will help them become a better team by April. 

    Here's the wishlist that Guerin and fans should want for Christmas. 

    Key players stay healthy

    The Wild must stay healthy to contend. In December last year, they were one of the league’s best teams. However, injuries took a toll on them. The Wild must monitor Joel Eriksson Ek's usage against elite competition. Kirill Kaprizov will need more scoring support. Jonas Brodin is projected to miss the start of the regular season due to surgery. Jared Spurgeon must be protected. 

    The Wild need Kaprizov to be back at a 100-point pace. Eriksson Ek will need to rebound offensively, and Brodin and Spurgeon need to stay durable to be effective. 

    Matt Boldy becomes a point-per-game producer 

    Boldy was exceptionally productive in the playoffs. Boldy scored 7 points in 6 games for the Wild against the Vegas Golden Knights. In his previous 12 playoff games, he only registered 4 points. Has Boldy finally hit his next stride

    Boldy reached 70 points (73) for the first time in his career this season. He's already a two-time 40-assist scorer and is also an established 30-goal scorer. 

    Can Boldy reach 50 assists? He finished this season with 46, so he’s close. If Boldy has a 30-goal season with 50 assists, then he'll reach his next goal in his young career! 

    Filip Gustavsson must be consistent

    Gustavsson averaged 2.57 goals against (GAA) in 142 regular-season games. He has a 91.4% save percentage (SV%) and 4 shutouts (SO). In 11 playoff games, he's averaged a 2.52 GAA and a 91.8 SV%. 

    His GAA was 2.56 last year, which ranked him 13th among goalies. His expected GAA (xGAA) was 2.83, which ranked him 25th. That means that Gustavsson’s GAA was 27% better than expected, which ranked him 21st. It's good that Gustavsson is performing better than expected. However, Gustavsson is capable of hitting another level

    Gustavsson’s unblocked SV% was 5th with 96%. He was tied for 4th with an expected SV% (xSV%) on unblocked shots with 95.5%. Unblocked shots are attempts that either hit or miss the net. 

    Gustavsson has been exceptional

    Zeev Buium finding a rhythm

    Buium gets the opportunity to make a name for himself in the NHL. He's headlining the Wild’s prospect pool. The Wild traded Declan Chisholm, allowing them to give Buium an extended look. With Brodin out at the beginning of the season, Buium gets to prove himself. He should find his rhythm next to Spurgeon. 

    Marco Rossi must have a true breakout season 

    Rossi deserves to receive $7 million in his next contract. Rossi was tied for 74th in the NHL in 5-on-5 points with 35 this season. Here are notable forwards he finished ahead of: 

    Rossi was tied for 44th in primary 5-on-5 assists with 14. Here's who he finished ahead of: 

    We've seen what Rossi is capable of at his worst. Now Rossi will be able to have a real breakout season. Will he become a point-per-game center? 

    Ryan Hartman must stay disciplined 

    Hartman has seen what he's capable of doing when it comes to producing depth scoring. 

    The more he stays in the penalty box and gets suspended, the more the Wild suffer. However, it’s one reason why Hartman is a streaky player. He was never a headlining player in his career. However, when he's at his best, he's capable of providing valuable secondary scoring. 

    Vladimir Tarasenko must be a good fit 

    Tarasenko is going to be a good fit on this team, but only if he can demonstrate good chemistry both on and off the ice. 

    He's expected to start on the second line. Can he eventually find himself next to Kaprizov, who convinced him to waive his NTC? Tarasenko is open to mentoring Danila Yurov, who broke his KHL record. 

    Jesper Wallstedt has to find another gear 

    Guerin has signed Samuel Hlavaj and Riley Mercer in the last 2 years. He's also signed Cal Petersen, veteran insurance who can start in the minors. 

    Still, none of these goaltenders has Wallstedt's potential. However, Wallstedt’s future could be in jeopardy if he doesn't improve. Gustavsson is in a contract year, and Wallstedt has yet to become an NHL-caliber goalie. 

    Liam Ohgren must establish a role

    It's time for the Wild to create a role for Ohgren. Ohgren has the potential to become the team's new Mr. September, currently held by Joel Eriksson Ek. Ohgren will be eager to make his case for a spot in the middle-six. The question is, who would be the best linemates for him to play that role? 

    Danila Yurov’s game must translate to the NHL

    Guerin and head coach John Hynes can see what they have in Yurov once training camp starts. He's expected to start at center. However, don't be surprised to see Yurov as a winger if he struggles early. 

    The Wild hope to continue building center depth from within. It's been challenging for Guerin to make a splash via trade. Yurov will be given the chance to start in the middle-six. Kaprizov and Tarasenko can help him adapt.

    David Jiricek must become an NHL regular 

    Jiricek is going to start on the third pairing, which is fine at this point for the Wild. Jiricek can establish himself as a great relief pitcher for the Wild. He'll be watching both Brock Faber and Spurgeon be great starters. Jiricek can be Brandon Carlo or Erik Cernak, but with the power play presence they don't possess. 

    The Wild are heading into the 2025-26 season with a better roster on paper despite Brodin being injured. Buium gets the opportunity to show fans what's in store for the near future. Could Carson Lambos be ready to play the third pair until Brodin returns? Does Guerin get his Kellogg Boulevard Christmas miracle by standing pat? 

    His goal is to have a fully healthy championship-caliber team by April. However, by December, we'd love to see this team on top of the standings. 

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    The Wild can bring Christmas to fans, who need a miracle on West 7th Street.”

    ~ Nice! 
     

    If this wish list gets filled, we’ll be looking good and in a position to be buyers at the trade deadline. Still hoping we can pull off a deal for McTavish at some point.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    A lot of hopes and dreams in this article. Basically everything needs to be the same or better than last year. The odds of that are astronomical. Gus is due for a let down season, if he follows trend. Jiricek better be way better than a third pair for what they gave up for him. They also have no choice to play the young guys (finally!), after getting rid of some vets and not directly replacing them. If Johansson becomes a regular in the top six, I'm watching a different team.

    One thing the Wild are, if not successful, is entertaining. That is exactly what Leipold wants. Just keep the fans watching (and spending money) and they don't have to win shit.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Scalptrash said:

    A lot of hopes and dreams in this article. Basically everything needs to be the same or better than last year. The odds of that are astronomical. Gus is due for a let down season, if he follows trend. Jiricek better be way better than a third pair for what they gave up for him. They also have no choice to play the young guys (finally!), after getting rid of some vets and not directly replacing them. If Johansson becomes a regular in the top six, I'm watching a different team.

    One thing the Wild are, if not successful, is entertaining. That is exactly what Leipold wants. Just keep the fans watching (and spending money) and they don't have to win shit.

    TRUTH BOMB ALERT

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    As long as Hynes lets the rookies (yurov, ohgren, buium, jiricek, and wally) get adequate ice time this year. 

    BG has made some decent low risk moves over his tenure, but has yet to swing big on a trade for another difference maker or center.  At some point he has to give up a quality asset or two to get this team better.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 7/16/2025 at 10:12 AM, Pewterschmidt said:

    TRUTH BOMB ALERT

    Hardly.

    A lot of the roster is returning.  Considering last year (and the year prior) the Wild had a lot of injuries to key players for significant portions of the season, producing similar or better results is actually more likely than it is unlikely unless we again have a lot of injuries to key players.  And while we do not yet know how some of the new players will produce in the NHL, those players have a higher ceiling than the players they replaced.  The odds are certainly not astronomically against the Wild doing as well or better.

    As far as Gustavsson having a letdown season...really?  One subpar season the season before last establishes a trend.  Wow.  If that's the case, maybe we should have kept Gaudreau because he won a lot of games for us in the shootout a couple years ago.  You know what, maybe the odds ARE astronomically against us because we gave him up.  

    Jiricek will likely be better than third pair in a couple years.  The cost high draft picks/prospects is high, and those players don't always play top minutes right away, but it doesn't mean he needs to do that this season in order to justify the cost.  If he does well enough to keep Bogosian on the bench after Brodin is back, then Jiricek likely gets 2nd pairing when Spurgeon inevitably gets hurt.

    Also, they had a choice not to play the young guys.  They could have easily re-signed Shore, etc and kept Gaudreau, but the prospects appear ready to really challenge for those spots.  They weren't at that point before now - and in some cases, weren't even in North America.  For all the comments about not letting prospects play, every prospect who has shown they can play well at the NHL level has been given time to do that, cap permitting.

    Johansson probably will play top six at some point if players get injured.  And you know what, that's okay.  I hope it doesn't end up being for long, but I'd rather have that than be calling up career AHLers who won't make an impact.  Johansson's impact is less than ideal, but he's a better fill-in than what we've had in the last few years.

    Every NHL owner wants their team to be entertaining and generate revenue.  There isn't a single owner in the league that doesn't want that.  Even Buffalo's owners don't want to lose money each year.

    Calling any of this a truth bomb is ridiculous.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    34 minutes ago, raithis said:

    Hardly.

    A lot of the roster is returning.  Considering last year (and the year prior) the Wild had a lot of injuries to key players for significant portions of the season, producing similar or better results is actually more likely than it is unlikely unless we again have a lot of injuries to key players.  And while we do not yet know how some of the new players will produce in the NHL, those players have a higher ceiling than the players they replaced.  The odds are certainly not astronomically against the Wild doing as well or better.

    As far as Gustavsson having a letdown season...really?  One subpar season the season before last establishes a trend.  Wow.  If that's the case, maybe we should have kept Gaudreau because he won a lot of games for us in the shootout a couple years ago.  You know what, maybe the odds ARE astronomically against us because we gave him up.  

    Jiricek will likely be better than third pair in a couple years.  The cost high draft picks/prospects is high, and those players don't always play top minutes right away, but it doesn't mean he needs to do that this season in order to justify the cost.  If he does well enough to keep Bogosian on the bench after Brodin is back, then Jiricek likely gets 2nd pairing when Spurgeon inevitably gets hurt.

    Also, they had a choice not to play the young guys.  They could have easily re-signed Shore, etc and kept Gaudreau, but the prospects appear ready to really challenge for those spots.  They weren't at that point before now - and in some cases, weren't even in North America.  For all the comments about not letting prospects play, every prospect who has shown they can play well at the NHL level has been given time to do that, cap permitting.

    Johansson probably will play top six at some point if players get injured.  And you know what, that's okay.  I hope it doesn't end up being for long, but I'd rather have that than be calling up career AHLers who won't make an impact.  Johansson's impact is less than ideal, but he's a better fill-in than what we've had in the last few years.

    Every NHL owner wants their team to be entertaining and generate revenue.  There isn't a single owner in the league that doesn't want that.  Even Buffalo's owners don't want to lose money each year.

    Calling any of this a truth bomb is ridiculous.

    If you're assuming the old core that's one and done'd since their existence will find another gear as they approach 35 years old collectively AND the unproven, untested new young core will jump into an NHL lineup and contribute (see: Khuz, Ogz, Rossi, etc in their first years) immediately then you sir are ridiculous.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 minutes ago, Enforceror said:

    Nah I'd pass unless Chinahkov wants to play in Iowa.

    He is cheap and has averaged about 1/2 point a game when he has played.  If it was cheap might be worth a shot, but doubt Columbus will give me away.  Maybe Nojo for him straight up.  Evanson might want that…

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 7/17/2025 at 1:53 PM, Pewterschmidt said:

    If you're assuming the old core that's one and done'd since their existence will find another gear as they approach 35 years old collectively AND the unproven, untested new young core will jump into an NHL lineup and contribute (see: Khuz, Ogz, Rossi, etc in their first years) immediately then you sir are ridiculous.

    I'm not assuming that at all. 

    I'm simply believe that we are advancing forward. I see an equation of diminishing returns of the aging/ineffective players + turnover of those players to less aged and/or more skilled players, and I don't see that making the team worse.  

    That doesn't require all of the prospects to do well.  It doesn't require players like Tarasenko and Sturm to be more than what's reasonable to expect them to be.  It only requires all of the newcomers to collectively do better than the players they replaced and for younger players that have already made it to NHL and shown they are capable (Boldy, Rossi, Faber, etc) to continue to progress to offset the diminishing returns on the older players.  

    That's not all that ridiculous. 

    What you called a truth bomb was an assertion that the Wild could not do the same or better than last year (a 7th place wild card).  This team is absolutely capable of doing the same.  Whether they do better depends whether the team again has a lot of lengthy injuries to key players and how well the prospects adapt.

     

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, raithis said:

    I'm not assuming that at all. 

    I'm simply believe that we are advancing forward. I see an equation of diminishing returns of the aging/ineffective players + turnover of those players to less aged and/or more skilled players, and I don't see that making the team worse.  

    That doesn't require all of the prospects to do well.  It doesn't require players like Tarasenko and Sturm to be more than what's reasonable to expect them to be.  It only requires all of the newcomers to collectively do better than the players they replaced and for younger players that have already made it to NHL and shown they are capable (Boldy, Rossi, Faber, etc) to continue to progress to offset the diminishing returns on the older players.  

    That's not all that ridiculous. 

    What you called a truth bomb was an assertion that the Wild could not do the same or better than last year (a 7th place wild card).  This team is absolutely capable of doing the same.  Whether they do better depends whether the team again has a lot of lengthy injuries to key players and how well the prospects adapt.

     

    I really wanted to double rec this one. Thanks

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...