Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • The Wild's Best Use Of Marco Rossi Might Be A D-Corps Upgrade


    Image courtesy of Matt Blewett-Imagn Images
    Justin Hein

    Bill Guerin and 27 other NHL GMs are probably golfing a lot (like me) right now. After someone wins the Stanley Cup in a few weeks, that number will rise to Guerin plus-31. Most of them will enjoy it. 

    Guerin won’t. 

    He has a lot to do before the NHL draft. While the Wild have only four picks in this draft, and none until Day 2, they need to line up a bidding war for Marco Rossi. If they trade Rossi, Minnesota doesn’t just need a fair return for the productive 23-year-old Austrian. They need a return that keeps their Cup window alive. 

    So when the GM says, “Our [defense] core is set, I'd like to focus on forwards,” he may not get to be picky. 

    There are two interesting notes about the Wild’s playoff showing: they didn’t need Marco Rossi to be competitive, and defensive depth was as much a liability as the forward depth. 

    While it’s debatable whether the Wild used Rossi optimally in the playoffs, it’s hard to argue that they used him in great volume. Ultimately, it seems that John Hynes doesn’t trust Rossi to drive a scoring line in the playoffs. Whether that’s correct on Hynes’s part, it’s hard to imagine that changing. 

    Taking that as a given, the optimal move is to swap Rossi for a player of a different flavor whom the Wild will use better. And if the defensive depth was as much a liability as the forward depth, that means the team has more potential trade partners in a Rossi deal. If they’re going to be picky about when they want to win, they may not have the luxury of doing it by improving specifically at forward. 

    Another wrinkle in the plan to open a multiple-year competitive window is the 2026-27 salary cap situation. Extending Kirill Kaprizov and replacing Mats Zuccarello’s production will come at a hefty cost, and it’s necessary to remain competitive. It’s pretty tricky timing to replace a top-six forward, because the upcoming cap increases smell very lucrative for those players’ agents. 

    That means Rossi’s replacement needs to be cost-controlled until the 2027 offseason. Minnesota's core will be cost-controlled once the cap is clean in 2026-27. Kaprizov, Joel Eriksson Ek, Matt Boldy, Brock Faber, Jonas Brodin, and Jacob Middleton will be locked up alongside this mystery second-line replacement for Zuccarello. Zeev Buium, David Jiricek, and Danila Yurov provide projectable young talent that can fill out the middle of the lineup. 

    Add in the Rossi trade return, though, and the 2026-27 cap space gets tight. The solution: find a player who’s interested in a short-term, cost-controlled deal with upside for an explosive payday on July 1, 2027. 

    A recent column in The Athletic mentioned Bowen Byram and K’Andre Miller as two interesting assets that may fit that description. Both are left-handed defensemen on struggling teams who have strong second-pair results in spite of the challenges presented by their teammates. 

    BYRAM ATHLETIC CARD 2024-25.JPG

    K MILLER ATHLETIC CARD 2024-25.JPG

    Miller spent last season on a Rangers team that’s hard not to describe as a let-down. After taking the Florida Panthers to six games in the 2024 Eastern Conference Finals, the Rangers spiraled throughout the 2024-25 season and missed the playoffs by six points. Stanley Cup aspirations turned into trade deadline sales. As Miller watched his teammates leave, perhaps he wondered how much money this season cost him in a contract year. 

    Byram was a phenom for the Colorado Avalanche in their 2022 Stanley Cup win before his 21st birthday. He’s in line for his first payday, but Evolving-Hockey.com projects him for only $8 million AAV on an eight-year deal. 

    During his tenure with Colorado, The Athletic projected Byram for a plus-five rating in his prime -- top-pair quality and valued around $6.5 million in 2024-25 cap dollars. Based on the future cap increases and a three-percent cap inflation after that, his average value would be around $9.7 million between his age 26 through age 32 seasons. 

    However, his time in Buffalo hasn’t always been so impressive. In 2023-24, Byram’s minus-four rating smelled more like bottom-pair than top-pair production. 

    BYRAM ATHLETIC CARD 2023-24.JPG

    If he comes to Minnesota for two years and joins a roster that competes for a Cup, perhaps he’ll rediscover his Colorado form and get paid in his prime when his market value will never be higher. Byram could maximize the timing of his largest contract with the peak of the cap explosion, and leverage that against that encouraging age curve he was on with the Avalanche. 

    Byram is 23, and Miller is 25. Both are entering their primes on a perfect timeline to meet Minnesota’s Cup window, with good reason to take a short contract in hopes of a payday in the 2027 offseason. 

    I hear the protests now: But the Wild already have Middleton and Brodin! This will block Buium’s development! Let’s not forget about Brodin’s superpower, though: His uncanny edgework allows him to play his off-hand when needed. He allows one of Byram or Miller to play top-four minutes, while potentially easing Brodin’s workload. Alternatively, Brodin can shift into Spurgeon’s role, softening the grind for the 35-year-old righty. 

    The bottom line is that Minnesota out-scored the Las Vegas Golden Knights in six games this April with Marco Rossi riding the fourth line. Take him out and supercharge the bottom defense pair with Middleton, Byram, Miller, or Spurgeon (pick your favorite), and tell me that’s not a contender. 

    This trade also has room to add pieces or combine with another trade. If management wants to move on from one of Spurgeon, Brodin, or Middleton. One of those players could be added to clear cap space and improve the forward group with another piece coming back. If the Wild want a real blockbuster, they could include a package of Rossi, a defenseman, and a prospect such as Liam Ohgren

    That would allow the team to get younger, add a top-six forward, and go all-in for the next few years while potentially improving cap flexibility in the immediate future. 

    Trading Rossi for a young, top-four defenseman would require some creativity -- either in the lineup or in the adjacent roster moves. Still, trading a cost-controlled, productive 23-year-old center is a pretty creative decision in itself. 

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Confused 3

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    The only reason they need to think about getting a defenseman for Rossi if they bring in a Norse Trophy level player.  They are not going to get that for Rossi.  Though there is some crazy buzz happening around Rossi.  That I don't understand.  Just RFA him and pay the draft picks.  A 1st and a 3rd for any offer less than 7 million a year.  If you think about it Rossi will be the best player in the 2026 draft if you offer him an RFA deal and you get him a year early.  It appears teams are talking about giving comperable players and possibly other players or picks for Rossi.  I don't understand that. 

    • Like 1
    • Confused 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If Hynes doesn't trust Rossi the optimal solution is to replace Hynes. Putting a young player lower in the lineup AFTER they struggle is normal. But Hynes never gave Rossi a chance. Maybe the weirdest coaching decision I've ever seen in 30 years of watching professional sports.

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I don't know where to look it* up, but each of Zuccarello's points this season cost $64.278 (4,125M a season is 50.305 over 82 games.
    He played 69, so 3.471M across 54 points

    *At $3.5M, who can replace his 54 points as well as experience and leadership?
    Put another way, who else costs $64.278 a point

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Let me try to understand.... the Wild caved in the playoffs because offense was weak.  One of our rising star forwards is offending to our coaching/ management.  So let's trade for another defender?  So then we have to allocate limited cap space to pay for another defender and our GF next season still remains shaky?  This move does nothing except push out any chance at a cup by 1-2 more years.  

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, hydguy75 said:

    Let me try to understand.... the Wild caved in the playoffs because offense was weak.  One of our rising star forwards is offending to our coaching/ management.  So let's trade for another defender?  So then we have to allocate limited cap space to pay for another defender and our GF next season still remains shaky?  This move does nothing except push out any chance at a cup by 1-2 more years.  

    I'm operating off the assumption they've decided to trade Rossi. If you add Brodin, Spurgeon, or Middleton into the deal you can bring back more than just Byram or K. Miller. 

    Good points about the offense -- I agree trading Rossi doesn't address the problem, it just moves his points out for somebody else's. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 hours ago, Thomas said:

    I don't know where to look it* up, but each of Zuccarello's points this season cost $64.278 (4,125M a season is 50.305 over 82 games.
    He played 69, so 3.471M across 54 points

    *At $3.5M, who can replace his 54 points as well as experience and leadership?
    Put another way, who else costs $64.278 a point

    This is why it'll be so difficult to replace Zuccarello -- that many points usually cost a lot more than Zucc does now. It's a huge reason that the 2026-27 salary cap is a major concern for me, unless the team just takes a step back and doesn't replace Zuccarello. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 hours ago, Patrick said:

    If Hynes doesn't trust Rossi the optimal solution is to replace Hynes. Putting a young player lower in the lineup AFTER they struggle is normal. But Hynes never gave Rossi a chance. Maybe the weirdest coaching decision I've ever seen in 30 years of watching professional sports.

    I really like Hynes for nearly every other decision he's made -- he's proven me wrong on most of the times I question him. 

    The Rossi playoff usage is not fireable on it's own but if he hadn't been doing such a good job elsewhere, I'd find it enough to call for his head. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 hours ago, 1Brotherbill said:

    The only reason they need to think about getting a defenseman for Rossi if they bring in a Norse Trophy level player.  They are not going to get that for Rossi.  Though there is some crazy buzz happening around Rossi.  That I don't understand.  Just RFA him and pay the draft picks.  A 1st and a 3rd for any offer less than 7 million a year.  If you think about it Rossi will be the best player in the 2026 draft if you offer him an RFA deal and you get him a year early.  It appears teams are talking about giving comperable players and possibly other players or picks for Rossi.  I don't understand that. 

    I don't think that you need to bring in a Norris trophy player. Bringing in a major upgrade for the third pair would have a massive puck-moving impact, which could drive scoring indirectly. With two really good RFA defensemen potentially on the market, I think it could be a reasonable alternative to shipping Rossi out for another forward. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, Justin Hein said:

    I don't think that you need to bring in a Norris trophy player. Bringing in a major upgrade for the third pair would have a massive puck-moving impact, which could drive scoring indirectly. With two really good RFA defensemen potentially on the market, I think it could be a reasonable alternative to shipping Rossi out for another forward. 

    For the love of god when is it fair to expect ONE of our defense man prospects to play their way into the lineup?

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, Pewterschmidt said:

    For the love of god when is it fair to expect ONE of our defense man prospects to play their way into the lineup?

    This team needs at least two top six forwards this offseason.  Spending any more capital on a defenseman is a dereliction of duty

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    For the love of god when is it fair to expect ONE of our defense man prospects to play their way into the lineup?

    This is a good point, which is why I leave it open to adding one of Spurgeon/Brodin/Middleton to bring back a forward. If Zeev and/or Jiricek look good in the offseason/in camp then they can make one of those guys more expendable. 

    If not, then you can play one or both of them on the bottom pair during injuries, or save some minutes for the old guys. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    August 21, 2019, does that date nearly six years ago mean anything to anyone? That's the day the Wild's savior was anointed General Manager.

    Six years is a long time to retain a GM in an organization that aspires to be a Cup contender, rather than just qualifying for the playoffs and not advancing beyond the first round. Owner Leipold appears to have given GMBG a very long leash, one that will certainly give him a seventh season.

    What is Guerin going to do with his leash this year? Probably sign Kaprizov to a record setting contract (which I am fine with), probably not re-sign one of his teams top offensive producers (and get a first and third round pick in 2026 as compensation for Rossi), will probably sign an aging UFA center from outside the organization who is past his prime to a contract in the $4M - $7M AAV range with term and unfavorable movement clauses, and will probably sign one or two of the Wild's UFA's or RFA's (not named Rossi) to  "team friendly" contracts.

    He will use up all of his salary cap space this summer and will not have any cash at the trade deadline in 2026 to use. If the Wild make the playoffs, they will basically be the same team that falters every year. 

    The Wild organization and it's fans could have a lot to look forward to this offseason and the upcoming season. That hope is diminished by the fact that GMBG is still holding the reigns in one hand and his worn out, predictable, unsuccessful playbook in the other.

    Sometime in late April or early to mid-May of 2026, OCL will pull the plug on Guerin and we will have lost the wonderful opportunities that we are facing now in 2025. And what Billy does between now and his inevitable firing will bury the Wild into an even deeper hole. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, ArizonaWildFan said:

    August 21, 2019, does that date nearly six years ago mean anything to anyone? That's the day the Wild's savior was anointed General Manager.

    Kirill Kaprisov was anointed General Manager?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, ArizonaWildFan said:

    He will use up all of his salary cap space this summer and will not have any cash at the trade deadline in 2026 to use. If the Wild make the playoffs, they will basically be the same team that falters every year. 

    Most of what you say may well happen, though I don't think he will use up all his cap space.  With things so tight the past year, I think that will be fresh in his mind and he won't want to put himself in the same position and be forced into certain decisions because of it.  I think he leaves himself more options this year.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...