Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness
  • The Wild Should Gamble On Alexander Holtz's Upside


    Image courtesy of Ed Mulholland-USA TODAY Sports
    Justin Wiggins

     

    Another week, another trade target. That’s what you get when your favorite team doesn’t qualify for the NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs – months and months of speculation. 

    Still, it’s warranted. As Bill Guerin’s faith among Wild fans begins to wane, he must look to add impact pieces now, even if they remain in cap hell for one more season.

    Wild insider Michael Russo has repeatedly reported the Wild’s desire to potentially add a scoring veteran in free agency with the upcoming slight increase in the salary cap. We wouldn't hate it even if it were a David Perron-type player. Lately, however, we’ve been focusing on what Guerin could do to get creative on the trade market rather than relying on veteran options past their prime.

    Last week, our first target was Nikolaj Ehlers, the Winnipeg Jets’ dynamic forward. Ehlers made sense financially and was a stylistic fit, even if executing an in-division trade could be challenging. Earlier this week, we discussed Martin Necas, the Carolina Hurricanes’ upcoming RFA. Necas would be another stylistic fit for what the Wild needs. However, like Ehlers, Necas falls into the category of an established, extremely productive player who would command a haul in any trade.

    What if the Wild opted for a lower-priced option they could take a gamble on? A player who has yet to establish himself in the NHL as an above-average forward yet still possesses tantalizing upside? 

    Introducing New Jersey Devils forward Alexander Holtz!

    Drafted 7th overall in 2020, just two spots ahead of Marco Rossi, Holtz has struggled to break through at the NHL level. Potentially the best pure shooter in his draft class, the right-handed Swede finally played his first full season in the NHL this past year, recording 16 goals and 28 points.

    While it’s justifiable for a 22-year-old to struggle with consistency, Holtz was under fire late in the season. His general manager was pretty blunt about it, too. “He has not had a good year,” said Tom Fitzgerald in March. Holtz’s 15 even-strength goals were encouraging. Still, he has well-established struggles on the defensive side of the puck, and it’s only exasperated on a team full of offensive-leaning forwards. It hasn’t been a great fit for Holtz in New Jersey.

    Perhaps he needs a change of scenery. And if the rumors are true that Holtz is available via trade this summer, he may be worth the chance for Minnesota to take a shot on.

    Let’s first explore what makes Holtz such an intriguing player and then discuss the potential cost of acquiring the young sniper.

    Plain and simple, Holtz can rip the puck. In their 2020 NHL Draft Guide, Elite Prospects may have put it best: “His shot is as good as it gets…. Holtz is a pure sniper as currently constructed, and he has the potential to be a first-line finisher with triggerman utility on the power play. He’s a special, special talent.”

    Maybe Minnesota Wild fans remember when he put that finishing talent on full display during a 3-5 loss against New Jersey in November.

     

     

    Holtz is a natural scorer. If you watch the rest of those highlights, you’ll see he possesses more than a great shot. Holtz creates his shot chances with his hockey IQ away from the puck. His ability to find scoring areas on the ice to allow him time to release his shot is already a plus attribute for NHL standards. Placing him on the wing opposite a playmaker of Mats Zuccarello’s stature has the potential to be fireworks.

    At six feet and nearly 200 pounds, his size does not deter him from competing in front of the net.

     

     

    But while Holtz’ fit next to Zuccarello and Rossi on the second line is betting on his game rounding into full form, the current iteration of Holtz would immediately impact the Wild’s streaky powerplay. 

    For the same reasons that signing an aging David Perron would help the power play, trading for Holtz would immediately provide a right-handed threat opposite Kaprizov. His ability to excel in the bumper position or as the flank opposite of Kaprizov gives the Wild the sort of flexibility on the man advantage they have been lacking.

    Why would Holtz be available then if the talent is clearly there? Why would the Devils look to move on from a top-10 pick just a few seasons after drafting him? It’s a numbers game in New Jersey. Holtz’s profile as a forward is similar to many of New Jersey’s other young forwards. Jack Hughes, Jesper Bratt, Nico Hischier, and Dawson Mercer are all young forwards who excel in the offensive zone. However, all but Hischier struggle mightily on defense.

    It was a significant reason why the Devils regressed this season and missed the playoffs, despite many people having them as a sleeper team coming out of the Eastern Conference.

    Most importantly, New Jersey has already allocated a large chunk of their cap space to the forward core. They’ve signed Timo Meier, Hughes, Bratt, Hischier, and Ondrej Palat to large deals of at least $6 million AAV through at least 2026-27. With the more “in favor” Dawson Mercer due for a contract this summer, it will be impossible for their front office to justify extending Holtz next summer when they have desperate needs on defense and in goal.

    Enter the Minnesota Wild, who have a goaltender on the trade market and a plethora of defensive prospects to offer. Our proposed offer would give the Devils the immediate help they need, and the Wild could secure a cheap, former 7th overall pick to fill in their top 6.

    To the Wild: Holtz + mid-round draft pick

    To the Devils: Jake Middleton (50% retained), Filip Gustavsson, and Ryan O’Rourke

    New Jersey is in a compete-now window and would probably prefer to flip Holtz for players who can help them win now. For Minnesota, such a trade would give them an entry-level contract to fill the hole on the second line. The trade also excludes the 13th overall pick. They could use the cost savings from adding Holtz and this year’s first-round pick to pursue a replacement for Middleton on the top pairing aggressively.

    It's the type of creative trade the Wild would be wise to explore. Signing a veteran forward on the open market is a short-term solution with minimal upside. However, pursuing a player like Holtz from a team as desperate to win as New Jersey would give them the upside potential to make the decision a home run for years to come.

     

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 2

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    16 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    We're going to need all 3 goalies next season. Both GUS and The Wall got hurt, and I'm not sold that Fleury won't either.

    Every team's goalies get hurt. Not every team carries 3 goalies.

    Look, Gus is getting shopped. If a decent trade value is available, he'll be traded. Then Flower and The Wall will be our goalies. We'd sign a guy that has some NHL experience but is AHL appropriate.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    16 minutes ago, FredJohnson said:

    You mean Gus?

    Goligoski is (probably) retiring.

    We've been through this, Goose2 becomes Goose because of Goligoski retiring. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    15 minutes ago, punch_cut said:

    You mean the 1 goal Nino scored in his last year with NY (55 games) is the same as the 14 he scored in the 1st yr (81 games)with MN?

    point ceded!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, FredJohnson said:

    Every team's goalies get hurt. Not every team carries 3 goalies.

    Look, Gus is getting shopped. If a decent trade value is available, he'll be traded. Then Flower and The Wall will be our goalies. We'd sign a guy that has some NHL experience but is AHL appropriate.

    That's what we had McIntyre for, but outside of sitting on the bench with a towel draped across his neck, he wasn't very useful for the team. I wouldn't expect that we'd run with 3 goalies, though we easily could. I'd expect that if one got banged up a little, The Wall would be on the I-35 shuttle. 

    Montreal had to carry 3 goalies for most of the year because they didn't want to lose one to waivers. If our 3rd goalie is in Iowa and has NHL experience, I'd suggest there is a high probability of this happening to us. At least The Wall is waivers exempt.

    Guerin has stuck 2 guys, the Czechian goalie and the WI goalie into the organization to be the goalies of the baby Wild. Your 3rd guy would have to play to be sharp. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    31 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    I just don't see the organizational log jam. We're going to need all 3 goalies next season. Both Goose and The Wall got hurt, and I'm not sold that Fleury won't either. Hopefully it's not all together at the same time. The Czechian goalie you mentioned has 0 time in the A. I wouldn't be comfortable with him as my 3rd choice, would you?

    Going forward, I think it's perfectly legitimate to have a battery of The Wall and Goose manning our net for about $5m for a brief time. Honestly, I don't see Goose having the stamina to go much more than a 1A in goal. When given more time last season, he kind of didn't pass the test. We all know he has struggled with working out. Those things do matter. 

    I agree with you wholeheartedly that if I had to pick 1 goalie to win 1 game tomorrow between GusBus/Wall/Anybody in Iowa, it would be GusBus without hesitation.  I also agree that the performance in the Worlds is different than the AHL/NHL.

    The root of the discussion is why he's being discussed as someone that we'd trade.  The only players without movement protection or an ELC are:

    • Boldy
    • Middleton
    • Merrill
    • GusBus

    Boldy probably isn't going to go, Merrill is not a valuable trade chip, so all that's left is either trading Midsy or GusBus.

    GusBus has a hot seat right now, and he didn't have a season last year that inspired confidence.  Additionally, it's clear that GusBus ain't going to be a franchise guy here, so why are you wasting the years of MAF mentorship on him?

    I think we're spoiled here thinking competent goaltending falls off trees because we've been able to grab competent goalies at ease.  You've got to think that Goalies want to come here as we've got a pretty good history of being able to build up guys resumes.  Dubnyk, Kuemper, Talbot, Stalock, Kahk, etc.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    That's what we had McIntyre for, but outside of sitting on the bench with a towel draped across his neck, he wasn't very useful for the team. I wouldn't expect that we'd run with 3 goalies, though we easily could. I'd expect that if one got banged up a little, The Wall would be on the I-35 shuttle. 

    Montreal had to carry 3 goalies for most of the year because they didn't want to lose one to waivers. If our 3rd goalie is in Iowa and has NHL experience, I'd suggest there is a high probability of this happening to us. At least The Wall is waivers exempt.

    Guerin has stuck 2 guys, the Czechian goalie and the WI goalie into the organization to be the goalies of the baby Wild. Your 3rd guy would have to play to be sharp. 

    All of this makes me even more sure that Gus gets traded. (Note: I don't think there are many good reasons for having The Wall in the AHL.)

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    19 minutes ago, MrCheatachu said:

    GusBus has a hot seat right now, and he didn't have a season last year that inspired confidence. 

    And he's only had one "good" season. (But he is young.)

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    21 hours ago, MrCheatachu said:

    Additionally, it's clear that GusBus ain't going to be a franchise guy here, so why are you wasting the years of MAF mentorship on him?

    I don't think this is absolutely clear. He's only 25, and as a goalie is still on an improvement line. The Wall is expected to be that franchise goalie, but there's nothing in the cards that says we can't have 2. I don't expect us to pay Goose in 2 years like a #1, especially with this past year behind him, but I do think that throwing out The Wall and Goose any given night in '25-26 will give us a shot at winning. Having 2 like this (and not playing Goose like a true #1) will have them with plenty in the tank come playoff time. 

    I also think that either of them can go on extended hot streaks, and that's what we'll need to break through the 1st round barriers.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    21 hours ago, FredJohnson said:

    3gsS.gif

     

    I've always loved this commercial.....but, yes, in my world this is exactly how it works! Next we'll be asking "Where's the Beef?"

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    I've always loved this commercial.....but, yes, in my world this is exactly how it works! Next we'll be asking "Where's the Beef?"

    giphy.gif

    • Like 1
    • Haha 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 5/20/2024 at 11:21 AM, FredJohnson said:

    Every team's goalies get hurt. Not every team carries 3 goalies.

    Look, Gus is getting shopped. If a decent trade value is available, he'll be traded. Then Flower and The Wall will be our goalies. We'd sign a guy that has some NHL experience but is AHL appropriate.

    What about that new guy from Slovokia...Hlavaj?  Where do you figure he fits in the mix?  Having a pretty good run at the world's. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 5/20/2024 at 9:11 AM, MrCheatachu said:

    Last season GusBus put up a rather pedestrian 3.06 gaa and 0.899 SV% over 45 games, with some stretches where he really stunk.

    I don’t particularly think it was his fault. Our defense was not very good or injured. When you have crappy defense, goaltending is never where it should be. You don’t throw a rookie goalie in and expect him to take the majority of the games in the regular season. It’s been done before but it’s never a great option. You risk hindering his development or destroying his confidence.

    In my opinion the only good thing about doing that would be that we would probably get a higher draft pick.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    17 hours ago, PiranhasOnIce said:

    What about that new guy from Slovokia...Hlavaj?  Where do you figure he fits in the mix?  Having a pretty good run at the world's. 

    Looks good...hope he can compete against bigger better competition.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...