Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • The Wild Should Cash In On the Sam Bennett Craze


    Image courtesy of Sam Navarro - Imagn Images
    Tony Abbott

    Over the past two months, Sam Bennett has made NHL general managers everywhere go, Hell yeah, that's the kind of guy we need in the playoffs.

    Bennett is now the favorite to win the Conn Smythe Trophy, and why shouldn't he be? He's got 14 goals and 20 points, all while providing speed and toughness for the Florida Panthers as they seek their second-straight Stanley Cup.

    There's even a good possibility that GMs everywhere will get a crack at getting a Sam Bennett-type player in... Sam Bennett. The soon-to-be 29-year-old will hit the open market unless Florida re-signs their pending UFA center. Many teams will want his services, and one will likely pay an absolute premium for them.

    Still, there's only one Sam Bennett, which means that, wherever he signs, a bunch of GMs will still be looking for that kind of player. A player who has a nose for the net and one who's kind of a jerk on the ice.

    It's hard to see the Minnesota Wild landing Bennett. The team has just under $16 million in cap space this summer, and Bennett would take up at least half of that room. As much appeal as having a Bennett-type would have for a Wild squad that hasn't won a playoff round in a decade, they likely need to aim higher than a player with a career-high of 51 points.

    That doesn't mean Minnesota can't benefit from the coming Bennett craze. Striking out on Bennett shouldn't stop a GM's need to get their hands on a Bennett-esque player. It should only stoke those flames, and the Wild are in a position to take advantage of that with Ryan Hartman

    No one is going to mistake Hartman for Bennett. Hartman doesn't have the reputation that comes with being part of a team that's made the Stanley Cup Final back-to-back-to-back. Hartman, 30, is also two years older than Bennett, giving him less appeal on the open market.

    Still, they're very similar players. Over the last four years, Bennett has scored 89 goals and 181 points in 279 games, which works out to 26 goals and 53 points every 82 games. Meanwhile, Hartman has 81 goals and 173 points over 284 games, giving him a similar 82-game pace statline of 23 goals and 50 points. As for their playstyles, Bennett has a reputation for being an agitator, and Hartman is... well, let's have Jake Middleton take it from here.

    That last part is the X-Factor for teams. Finding a 50-point player isn't especially tough for a GM, even in this weak-ish free-agent class. The trouble is finding a 50-point player who will enable a team to compete with a team like the Panthers, who run deep in agitators. Hartman might be that guy for whatever team finishes as Bennett's second- or third-favorite destination this summer.

    Again, though, we must mention that even being, in Middleton's words, "kinda a POS" doesn't make Hartman equal to Bennett.

    For one, Hartman's antics have had NHL Player Safety fed up with the Wild forward, while Bennett hasn't burned through his goodwill with the institution yet. The NHL suspended Hartman for eight (reduced from 10) games this year for driving Tim Stützle's head into the ice in February, while Bennett avoided suspension after elbowing Anthony Stolarz in the head during the first round. Fair or not, Hartman's reputation (and five career suspensions) indicate that he frequently crosses the line, while Bennett only dances on it.

    Still, you must credit Hartman for coloring within the lines during the playoffs, while being one of Minnesota's most productive postseason performers. He finished third on the team in points (six). If you're looking to point fingers concerning the Wild's inability to put the Vegas Golden Knights away, Hartman's the last person you should look at. 

    While Bill Guerin and the Wild can't market Hartman as Bennett's equal, they could use this offseason to push him as the perfect discount option. Any would-be Bennett suitor could get similar numbers, versatility, and edge in Hartman, all at around half the price. And who's to say that in the right spot, Hartman couldn't put up strong playoff numbers the way Bennett has?

    Given Bennett's last three playoff runs, where he scored 26 goals and 49 points in 59 games, that sounds ridiculous. But Bennett wasn't always Playoff Bennett, either. During the first 45 playoff games of his career, Bennett had just 13 goals and 27 points over six playoff runs, none of which saw his teams advance past the second round.

    Again, Hartman lags behind Bennett in career postseason points (eight goals, 21 points in 41 games). Still, he's picked things up in his last three trips to the playoffs. Four goals and 16 points in 17 games isn't too shabby.

    The problem with floating Hartman is that if he's a Bennett-lite, why not keep him? Don't the Wild need playoff performers with an edge? That argument carries weight, but there are reasons to see if Minnesota can cash in its chips on Hartman now.

    The Wild are looking to take the next step, and they don't have a ton of cap space to do that with. Moving Hartman would clear up to $4 million in cap room for the next two seasons, giving them a bit more ability to add a big-time player and freeing up some room in a lineup full of 30-something forwards

    Furthermore, Bennett presents a surprise opportunity to move a player who was looking like an albatross two months ago. Hartman felt untradeable as recently as April. Teams want an agitator. They don't want a player who's one bad decision from a 20-game suspension. Hartman's playoff series removed some of that stink, showing he can be effective when he controls himself. But what if Guerin doesn't think he can exhibit that self-control for two whole seasons? Then now is the opportunity to cut bait.

    It's a fascinating conundrum for the Wild. Will they roll the dice and stick with their Sam Bennett Lite, taking the good with the bad? While the rest of the league zigs towards finding more playoff-made agitators, will the Wild zag and sell high on their version of that mold of player?

    Thanks to Bennett's ascendancy, Minnesota can exploit the league's newest trend -- if it's bold enough to do so.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 4
    • Thanks 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    So people who want to become Stanley Cup contenders should want to acquire Hartman because he's Diet-Bennett... but the Wild shouldn't want to be one of those teams themselves? 

    Not sure that makes sense. 

    Guerin is in year 3 of his five-year-plan 2.0, I don't think getting rid of playoff contributors is the way to keep his job going forward or to help the team get out of round 1...

    • Like 3
    • Haha 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hartman was one of the best players for the Wild in the Vegas series.  As long as he keeps his head the guy can play and contribute anywhere in the lineup... and at a reasonable price.  

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Bennett-lite or diet-Bennett is a perfect name. Hartzy is 1" shorter and listed at 3 lbs. lighter. While Hartzy has had more suspensions, to me, Bennett is the meaner player. If we could offload Hartzy ffor a decent pick/prospect/player right now, I'd say do it.

    Hartman is actually a type of player I really like, but I feel his right shoulder still isn't right. He got in 1 fight this year, tried hard not to throw a right hand and tried to do it left handed. I think we need a couple of guys like Bennett, but I really don't think Hartman is that guy.

    Hartman's got some good position flexibility and he can produce some points. That alone makes him valuable. I do not see Hartman being around for our cup run, though.

    More evidence: DesLauries, Reeves, Bogosian, Breezers, Trenin. These are guys brought in during Hartman's tenure who were meant to play that role. I don't believe that Guerin thinks Hartman is that guy either.

    I'm a hard sell on this one.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hartman played like a man possessed in the playoffs.  That said, he's one fuck up away from being in no man's land.  If he's a secondary piece to get a better trade done, you have to consider it.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Huh? Only way I would trade Hartman is for Bennett. Dumbest thoughts ever to just trade to free up 4 million for another whimp. Bennett or forget it.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    More like the Sam Bennett ultralight. Hartman hasn’t put up comparable stats since the 21-22 season. He can’t fight anywhere near as good. But I guess he sort of plays a similar role…

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 hours ago, MNCountryLife said:

    Hartman was one of the best players for the Wild in the Vegas series.  As long as he keeps his head the guy can play and contribute anywhere in the lineup... and at a reasonable price.  

    For a bottom 6 player, 4 mil is too much.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, Sam said:

    More like the Sam Bennett ultralight. Hartman hasn’t put up comparable stats since the 21-22 season. He can’t fight anywhere near as good. But I guess he sort of plays a similar role…

    I kinda think that was Tony's point...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 hours ago, B1GKappa97 said:

    So people who want to become Stanley Cup contenders should want to acquire Hartman because he's Diet-Bennett... but the Wild shouldn't want to be one of those teams themselves? 

    Not sure that makes sense. 

    Guerin is in year 3 of his five-year-plan 2.0, I don't think getting rid of playoff contributors is the way to keep his job going forward or to help the team get out of round 1...

    He is in year 7, but keep going.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 hours ago, Need4speed99 said:

    He is in year 7, but keep going.

    Yes but he apparently got to reset his five-year plan in the middle of it. 

    Last year was allegedly year 2 of it, so he's going into year 3 now. Hence the 2.0 I added in there. I agree its a stupid way to describe whatever they're planning but that's how they did it so I'm just using their own vernacular xD 

    At the least, I doubt he'll get to get a 3rd if this one doesn't work out. 

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 hours ago, Need4speed99 said:

    For a bottom 6 player, 4 mil is too much.

    He's middle 6. If there's an injury to either Ek or Rossi, its Hartman who moves up without looking out of place. 

    He started on the 4th but then they quickly put him on the 3rd and 2nd lines in the playoffs. And that's the kind of style he can play. Unless they're about to add a legit top-line C, Hartman will remain a middle-6 guy for us. 

    Last year was a down-season for him, points wise, but he has been a roughly 40-pt player over his career so $4M is a very fair value for him. 

    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, B1GKappa97 said:

    At the least, I doubt he'll get to get a 3rd if this one doesn't work out.

    Do we think bill gets a full ten years to win a first round, or is it possible he get's the hook if this group one and out's this upcoming season?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, B1GKappa97 said:

    injury to either Ek or Rossi, its Hartman who moves up without looking out of place.

    This is really Hartman's value.  Very versatile and can be effective (ie score big goals), unlike Fred who plays throughout the lineup but is a passenger wherever he plays.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 hours ago, Need4speed99 said:

    For a bottom 6 player, 4 mil is too much.

    The NHL Salary Cap is $95.5 Million next season.  I tend to think of the salary cap as a per line cost rather than per player.  Such as the following.

    Defense top/middle/bottom:  7M, 4M, 2M Total:  $28M

    Offense 1st/2nd/3rd/4th:  9M/5M/4M/1.5M  Total: $58.5M

    Goalies 1st/2nd:  6M/ 2M  Total $8M

    Grand Total: $94.5  Leaving $1M left over.

    Not an easy numbers game.  The numbers I put down I would consider a roster with depth.  Increase the pay of the top 6 and you create a top heavy roster.  What kind of roster do you want to create.  Edmonton is top heavy.  Florida is balanced.  Both are in the SC final so there is no right answer.

    • Like 5
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    Do we think bill gets a full ten years to win a first round, or is it possible he get's the hook if this group one and out's this upcoming season?

    That's a good question, actually. 

    I like to imagine that they won't go one-and-done again now that they'll be able to add some talent on top of the prospects coming in, but if it does happen... I don't know. His seat would be hot, for sure. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 hours ago, Enforceror said:

    I'm curious how Guerin got picked for the 4 Nations job. Were other GMs not interested? Is Guerin viewed as a good GM by other entities?

    Wasn't he one of the only ones there?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    33 minutes ago, Need4speed99 said:

    Wasn't he one of the only ones there?

    I tried to look into this. Not much on the inner workings but here's what I found (NHL.com)

    The rumors and some of the work of the NHL being back in the Olympics and with 4 Nations, we had heard about for a while and we had some conversations," said Pat Kellher, executive director of USA Hockey. "So, I think [John Vanbiesbrouck, assistant executive director of hockey operations for USA Hockey] and I were excited to move forward on this and John certainly goes back a few years with Billy."

    Vanbiesbrouck said Guerin is a perfect fit for the job.

    "I think we trust Bill, No. 1," Vanbiesbrouck said. "We have deep bench of GMs to pull from, but we were going down the route with Billy the last time. We had great conversations, love his leadership and, overall, he's a winning hockey player, but he's a winning GM, too. So, I think our decision was fairly easy for us."

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 hours ago, Enforceror said:

    Is Guerin viewed as a good GM by other entities?

    I believe so, but putting an Olympic team together is a bit different than GMing a NHL franchise.  You can't trade for Canadians in international play.  

    During the 4 Nations, I thought Guerin assembled one of the best US teams ever put together.  For the first time I thought we looked like the more physical team playing against Canada and actually outplayed them.  It was a fun set of games to watch

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 6/13/2025 at 9:14 AM, Pewterschmidt said:

    Do we think bill gets a full ten years to win a first round, or is it possible he get's the hook if this group one and out's this upcoming season?

    I don't think he gets the hook, but the temperature in his seat is likely a lot hotter. Judd's too.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 6/13/2025 at 9:52 AM, MNCountryLife said:

    Not an easy numbers game.  The numbers I put down I would consider a roster with depth.  Increase the pay of the top 6 and you create a top heavy roster.  What kind of roster do you want to create.  Edmonton is top heavy.  Florida is balanced.  Both are in the SC final so there is no right answer.

    I think you can top heavy the top 6 a little bit if you also have some ELC contracts mixed in. You get tremendous value in that.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...