Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • The Wild Aren't A Team Worth Investing In At the Trade Deadline


    Image courtesy of Matt Blewett-Imagn Images
    Chris Schad

    When the season began, the Minnesota Wild dreamt of the situation they’re in right now. Coming off missing the playoffs for the third time in the past 12 seasons, the Wild are eight points ahead of the final wild-card spot in the Western Conference and look like a virtual lock to return to the playoffs this spring.

    A team like this usually catches Bill Guerin's attention, whose history of deadline deals suggests that he will attempt to add to this roster to make a Stanley Cup run. But while the Wild have played well, they are not a team worth investing in at this year’s trade deadline.

    That may seem preposterous to the Wild's loyal fans. Minnesota has 14 of their final 24 games at home, including a seven-game homestand next month. They’re enjoying breakout seasons from Jake Middleton and Marco Rossi. Matt Boldy and Brock Faber are coming off strong performances at the 4 Nations Tournament, and Joel Eriksson Ek and Kirill Kaprizov will eventually return from injury.

    But a deeper look at the Wild shows this team may have too many flaws to fix with a deadline deal.

    The most glaring problem is that Eriksson Ek and Kaprizov are injured. Kaprizov was having a Hart Trophy season before he suffered a groin injury after the Christmas break. After recording 50 points in his first 34 games, Kaprizov has played in three games since. Guerin admitted he has no idea when the Russian star will return from this injury. By the time he does, he may not have enough time to get into game shape for a playoff series.

    Take the 2022-23 season as an example. Kaprizov was injured in a March 6 win over the Winnipeg Jets and missed over a month with a groin injury. He returned for the final two games of the regular season but wasn’t the same explosive player, recording only one goal in Game 1 of a six-game playoff series loss to the Dallas Stars.

    There's a similar cloud of secrecy surrounding Eriksson Ek’s injury. Few players on this roster have Eriksson Ek’s toughness, but it may have been to his detriment when he went to play for Sweden in the 4 Nations Tournament. You can’t blame him for wanting to play for his country. However, it may have been costly if he initially suffered his lower-body injury during the tournament.

    The combination of these two injuries has Wild fans firing up the trade machine. But even if the Wild pull off a blockbuster for Brock Nelson, Brock Boeser, or any other Minnesotan available via trade, no one can replace Eriksson Ek or Kaprizov. More realistically, they may not be able to help a flawed team.

    For starters, the Wild’s penalty kill isn’t just bad. It’s historically bad. The Wild’s 71.4% penalty kill rate this season is the 10th lowest in NHL history since the league started keeping track during the 1977-78 season. The New York Islanders (70.2%) and the Detroit Red Wings (69.6%) have lower percentages this season. However, neither team will likely make the playoffs, making the Wild’s problem more glaring.

    Elite goaltending is a way to fix that, but the Wild haven’t gotten that either. Filip Gustavsson started the year hot with a 13-4-3 record and a .931 save percentage but is 9-8 with a .895 save percentage over his last 18 starts. The struggles have worsened recently: Gustavsson has a 4-6 record with a .886 save percentage.

    If the Wild were the offensive team they could be with Kaprizov and Eriksson Ek in the lineup, this wouldn’t be an issue. However, as Tuesday’s loss to the Detroit Red Wings showed, this team has no margin for error. Gustavsson only faced 16 shots but allowed three goals in a 3-2 loss. If Gustavsson can’t find a suitable level of play, it creates another challenge unless they want to try and get one last playoff run out of Marc-Andre Fleury.

    Even then, there’s still the temptation to go all in blindly. The Wild were legitimate Stanley Cup contenders when Kaprizov went down. If they can get him back, they can make a run. But can Nelson, who is part of another historically bad penalty kill, make a difference until he gets back? And would it be worth acquiring Dylan Cozens from the Buffalo Sabers to replace Eriksson Ek and to hedge against Rossi not re-signing next season?

    There’s also a history of playoff failures with this core. They blew a 2-1 lead in the 2023 series against the Stars and a 2022 series against the St. Louis Blues. As much as we want Boldy to pop up in a series like this, he hasn’t done it yet, with just four points (1 G, 3 A) in 12 career playoff games. Then there were Marcus Foligno's back-to-back meltdown with a late Game 4 penalty and a Game 5 ejection during the playoff series with the Stars.

    Then there's the whole playing-at-home thing, where the Wild have mysteriously posted a 13-13-1 record in St. Paul this season.

    Minnesota will get the chance to turn it around. Still, is it worth making a seismic move, especially when the Wild already traded their first-round pick for David Jiricek? Even then, the first names teams will ask for in a trade are Zeev Buium and Danila Yurov, who the Wild aren’t trading.

    Still, the chances are high that Guerin will do something to improve this team because they’ve earned that right. But you will be disappointed if you’re hoping for a massive move that magically fixes the Wild.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    BRAVO!  An article that makes sense.   Our window opens next year. 

    Enjoy what is left of this year, whatever that brings, but we are once again limping in with a battered team that can't score goals when things get tough.  

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Quote

    The Wild’s 71.4% penalty kill rate this season is the 10th lowest in NHL history since the league started keeping track during the 1977-78 season. The New York Islanders (70.2%) and the Detroit Red Wings (69.6%) have lower percentages this season. However, neither team will likely make the playoffs, making the Wild’s problem more glaring.

    #1. After a slow start, the Red Wings are tied for the 2nd best points% in the league since Christmas and are currently in 7th in the Eastern conference. Why would anyone think they aren't likely to make the playoffs?

    Quote

    The Wild were legitimate Stanley Cup contenders when Kaprizov went down.

    #2. If the Wild were considered Cup contenders when Kaprizov went down(.657 points percentage), then they should be considered cup contenders with him back in the fold. I didn't consider them cup contenders then, but they shouldn't abandon trying to compete just because a couple of guys are out. Also, Detroit's winning percentage under their new coach(.750) should make them cup contenders if the Wild were ever considered one.

    The Wild are unlikely to make a major move, but they certainly should use Eriksson-Ek's cap space to add a player to close the regular season, and hope JEE is ready for the start of the playoffs.

    #3. All of those past playoff years were under a different coach. If KK97 and JEE get healthy for the playoffs, they could be a tough out.

    Edited by Imyourhuckleberry
    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The team doesn't have enough balance to make a run yet.  They are tied for 19th in goals for, 9th in goals against, 23rd in PP%, and 30th in PK%.  Dallas has much higher goals for and the best PK% in the league.  Winnipeg is obviously doing great at pretty much everything.  Edmonton and Colorado has the playoff pedigree the Wild don't, and LA's beaten the pants off the team in nearly ever encounter.

    There's reason to suspect Kap and Ek would be great return additions.  But the team wasn't beating anyone handly WITH them on the team.  Kap is great, but Ek is not the same offensive player he was last year.  Faber isn't either.  The most you could say is Rossi and Boldy have held things together enough to get victories.  Adding one extra forward or even two is probably not enough to convince me this is the year to do it.

     

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Forgot to add that Boldy had just turned 22 years old within 2 weeks of the most recent Wild playoff series. Using his past playoff performances against top teams(Dallas had the 3rd lowest goals against for teams entering the 2023 playoffs) as reasons to think he might not deliver in future years seems a bit ridiculous.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Billy will invest in this team for a few reasons - 

    • regardless of injuries - he cannot have two years of failure, especially after such a great start to have such a massive collapse (should they fail to make it)
    • he has his young core - Rossi, Faber and Boldy out there - they need to perform; not to mention his guys (the ones he gifted contracts to) - Trenin, Harty, Foligno, MJ, the entire D line healthy - they all have to step up - otherwise it traces back directly to him
    • he needs to show Kap that this is the core that he can go to war with and it's not just Kap saving the day, and that is why they (and Billy) must succeed

    Thus, he will trade. Will the trade work? Well i think it will help us get into the PO. But it will hurt long term. Why? I think he will extend the player that he will trade for and it will cost us the big fish. It will likely cost us Kaprizov too. There are only two options here - Brock B or Brock N. Both will cost and will not be what Kaprizov needs.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    IF he is available, and IF he is willing to sign here long term, the Wild should do whatever it takes to get Mikko Rantanen and sign him. Ohgren, Gaudreau, Johansson, Riley Heidt, Aaron Kiviharju and a 2027 1st should do it. Then offer Trenin for Yegor Chinakhov. This is a bit of roster shake up, but the Wild won't be true contenders, even in the next few years without the roster changing. Moving on from Hartman and trading (gulp) Spurgeon in the off season would (along with rising salary cap) allow them to sign Rantanen and Brock Nelson (imagine a third line of Nelson-Ek-Foligno) while re-signing Kaprizov, Rossi, khusnutdinov, Lauko, and Declan Chisholm. This would bring Rantanen and Chinakhov in for this year's (and future) playoffs, while creating space for Jiricek, Buium, and Yurov for next season.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The increase in cap space should allow us to be a deeper team next year.  Trading away valuable pieces this year for a rental means we won't have them next season for trade bait.  Hope for the best this year but we are sellers.  Next season we should have Yurov, Zeev, Jiricek and Ohgren all playing up and playing better.  Faber, Rossi, Boldy should also take a step forward.  Subtract out Nojo, Freddy and Hartman and add in 2 more top 6 players in FA and this team will compete... and we should have extra trade value for next years deadline.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Is Gus becoming a problem?  He seems to do extremely well when he is spot starting...not so well as the primary goalie.  Last year he played well when they alternated starts.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    35 minutes ago, OldDutchChip said:

    Billy will invest in this team for a few reasons - 

    • regardless of injuries - he cannot have two years of failure, 

    I have no idea how the ownership feels about Billy, but the salary cap issue was not his creation.  I don't think he is perfect, and his extensions of some older players for too long, for too much, and with too many protections is highly dubious.  That said, I don't think I would be able to move on from him until he got to use some of his picks and a full cap.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, Dis-allowed display name said:

    I have no idea how the ownership feels about Billy, but the salary cap issue was not his creation.  I don't think he is perfect, and his extensions of some older players for too long, for too much, and with too many protections is highly dubious.  That said, I don't think I would be able to move on from him until he got to use some of his picks and a full cap.

    argh i am going to get all the hate again, but please remember that no one is taking money from us that we could spend. they allowed us the buy outs, but it's not magic - you cannot re-use that money. 

    our issue is that the money was spent on players who did not deserve it. if we bought out kaprizov and faber - that would feel different. but the quality of the players that you buy out matter. that quality in relation to the money paid is why we are now complaining. this means - the cap hit itself is not the problem. we would not have 15 MM to spend. it would either be Parise and Suter or no one. We decided to have no one. So there is NO cap hell in truth. 

    as for Billy's fate - well that depends on Kaprizov. Kaprizov stays - Billy stays and vice versa.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    40 minutes ago, OldDutchChip said:

    Billy will invest in this team for a few reasons - 

    • regardless of injuries - he cannot have two years of failure, especially after such a great start to have such a massive collapse (should they fail to make it)
    • he has his young core - Rossi, Faber and Boldy out there - they need to perform; not to mention his guys (the ones he gifted contracts to) - Trenin, Harty, Foligno, MJ, the entire D line healthy - they all have to step up - otherwise it traces back directly to him
    • he needs to show Kap that this is the core that he can go to war with and it's not just Kap saving the day, and that is why they (and Billy) must succeed

    Thus, he will trade. Will the trade work? Well i think it will help us get into the PO. But it will hurt long term. Why? I think he will extend the player that he will trade for and it will cost us the big fish. It will likely cost us Kaprizov too. There are only two options here - Brock B or Brock N. Both will cost and will not be what Kaprizov needs.

    Yea, it is kind of a catch 22.  Make some moves to help this year and can hurt us getting a big fish next year.  One option is if Ek is going to be out the rest of the year, we might be able to get Nelson to help out this year.   We can wait to sign him and see if Ranty or Marner are available after the season.  There are not a whole lot of other FA options this offseason that I would consider big fish (Ehlers maybe too, but I wouldn't consider him a big fish).  

    If we can't get the top FA's, we can look and see if any of the 26 class has said they would not resign with their team.  The top guys in that class, not including older players like Malkin and Ovechkin and Panarin, would be McDavid (one can dream), Eichel, Necas and Kyle Connor.  

    If not, we would have to wait until the trade deadline and see if any of these players are available.  Kind of sucks that all of them are in our division or in our conference which might make it tougher.  If Nelson is not signed for a anything more than three years and for not a ton of money, he could be a trade chip.  As long as we do not have to give up much for Nelson, this could be an option.  This is assuming that he is even available.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 minutes ago, SkolWild73 said:

    Yea, it is kind of a catch 22.  Make some moves to help this year and can hurt us getting a big fish next year.  One option is if Ek is going to be out the rest of the year, we might be able to get Nelson to help out this year.   We can wait to sign him and see if Ranty or Marner are available after the season.  There are not a whole lot of other FA options this offseason that I would consider big fish (Ehlers maybe too, but I wouldn't consider him a big fish).  

    If we can't get the top FA's, we can look and see if any of the 26 class has said they would not resign with their team.  The top guys in that class, not including older players like Malkin and Ovechkin and Panarin, would be McDavid (one can dream), Eichel, Necas and Kyle Connor.  

    If not, we would have to wait until the trade deadline and see if any of these players are available.  Kind of sucks that all of them are in our division or in our conference which might make it tougher.  If Nelson is not signed for a anything more than three years and for not a ton of money, he could be a trade chip.  As long as we do not have to give up much for Nelson, this could be an option.  This is assuming that he is even available.

    i think my vote would be to either

    (a) keep dialing Buffalo and try to get Tuch (without giving up Yurov or Zeev; this would not include Rossi or Boldy, but any other forward prospect is fair game; give them Foligno if they want him back)

    or

    (b) call montreal and see if their boss is so anti-russian that he is willing to deal demidov for zeev (or for faber, it doesn't matter)

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, OldDutchChip said:

    (a) keep dialing Buffalo and try to get Tuch (without giving up Yurov or Zeev; this would not include Rossi or Boldy, but any other forward prospect is fair game; give them Foligno if they want him back)

    How about Cozens? Saw his name floated by Russo & Smith in their article today. Rossi wouldn't be back if that happens but something to think about.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    After some heavy thinking i came up with another plan 5 minutes ago  ,  ive been kind of impressed with Ryan Donato the last couple games we played the hawks .  I say why not try it again we swap 1 or 2 of  MJ and Fredie G plus Chisholm straight up for Donato   ,  3 of these are free agents with Freddy having 2 more years  . for us we gain 3 million cap space the Hawks take on 3 million but only 2 with freddie as MJ ,,Chisholm are FAs  and Donato is a FA  ,   Who knows maybe this sparks our offence  even though id like to keep Chisholm  Jiri and Zeev take over that and Merril  ,   

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 minutes ago, M_Nels said:

    How about Cozens? Saw his name floated by Russo & Smith in their article today. Rossi wouldn't be back if that happens but something to think about.

    I saw that, but why would it mean no Rossi? ....and honestly i know little about Cozens, so i have no idea how he'd fit in.... but wouldn't we be able to fit in Rossi and Cozens? yes, that would mean we would be done shopping or have to move some money around (if rossi decides to play hard ball .... but that's another topic 🙂 )

    my preference is to not inherit LT money contracts unless it's for a top guy. give your self some flexibility to go after top guys in the off season. even if they get Nelson, i'd let him walk rather than pay him 6-7 mm. you need guys ages 24-28, not 36. i think a trade for Yanni would be the one i'd consider. He would fit in where we need help. i think he is a rock at PK and a playoff beast. I'd go for him! and he is a much easier contract to digest LT, and we can still try to spend in the off season. 

    thoughts?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    13 minutes ago, OldDutchChip said:

    I saw that, but why would it mean no Rossi? ....and honestly i know little about Cozens, so i have no idea how he'd fit in.... but wouldn't we be able to fit in Rossi and Cozens? yes, that would mean we would be done shopping or have to move some money around (if rossi decides to play hard ball .... but that's another topic 🙂 )

    my preference is to not inherit LT money contracts unless it's for a top guy. give your self some flexibility to go after top guys in the off season. even if they get Nelson, i'd let him walk rather than pay him 6-7 mm. you need guys ages 24-28, not 36. i think a trade for Yanni would be the one i'd consider. He would fit in where we need help. i think he is a rock at PK and a playoff beast. I'd go for him! and he is a much easier contract to digest LT, and we can still try to spend in the off season. 

    thoughts?

    Good thing is Rossi doesn’t have much choice in his contract unless he is offersheeted by someone.  His choice is to sign, sit out a year or play overseas.  Theoretically, if no one offer sheets him, we could sign him for one year at 2M.

    To me, Cozens is high risk high reward.  Was great two years ago, is young, and is signed for a while.  Has just struggled recently.  Could still have both he and Rossi if we sign no one else.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    39 minutes ago, M_Nels said:

    How about Cozens? Saw his name floated by Russo & Smith in their article today. Rossi wouldn't be back if that happens but something to think about.

    I would rather take a swing at him than Nelson.  He is only 24 and signed at 7.1M through 2030.  He is only two years removed from a 31g 37a season.  Also is 6’3 and 207.  Some risk but upside is better than any other non top guy.

    I think we could still keep Rossi too

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...