Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • The Mikko Rantanen Trade Ramps Up the Urgency On A Kaprizov Extension


    Image courtesy of Matt Blewett - Imagn Images
    Tony Abbott

    Look, there's nothing that I'd rather do than do a freaking jig on the graves of the Colorado Avalanche. The Cha Cha Slide, a Moonwalk, and maybe even the Marcus Foligno-centric "Hot To Go" parody Nordy does on the Xcel Energy Center's Jumbotron. Watching the Avs drop a surprise Mikko Rantanen trade where they got, generously, 75 cents on the dollar felt incredible.

    But anyone in Minnesota knows better than to put that kind of karma out into the world. Because while the rest of the Central Division might be riding high knowing that Nathan MacKinnon is down a running mate, the Minnesota Wild have to take care of their own business before celebrating the downfall of a rival.

    The Wild got a look into the Dark Timeline, one where they don't sign Kirill Kaprizov to a mega-extension and have to sell off the final year of an MVP-caliber winger before losing him for nothing. And if the Avs are any indication, that future isn't pretty.

    I'm not dunking on Colorado GM Joe Sakic. He's got a Stanley Cup Ring, and he's no fool. His trade history is riddled with teams that he robbed along the way. Sakic once stole top-pair defender Devon Toews for a pair of second-round picks. Matt Duchene wanted out of town, and he turned him into Bowen Byram and Sam Girard. He also had the sense not to trade loose change for Nazem Kadri but the guts to let him walk and not sign him to a poison-pill contract.

    So, if anyone's getting a haul for 35 games of Rantanen, it's him. And looking at what came back... it's uninspiring. Your mileage may vary on Martin Necas, the principal return. Since the start of the 2022-23 season, Necas has 68 goals and 179 points in 209 games. That's strong production, and his 55 points (16 goals) in his first 50 games tracked for a career year. 

    But while Necas is indisputably a top-six winger, his overall game doesn't measure up to his counting stats. During that same time, Rantanen put up 12.3 Standings Points Above Replacement for Colorado, which puts him 32nd among all skaters in the NHL. That's a borderline MVP-type of talent. You'll have to look all the way down at 146th to find Necas and his 6.9 SPAR. 

    That's a massive drop-off in talent, and while future-focused assets could level the playing field for Colorado... they didn't get much in the way of those, either. Colorado landed Jack Drury, a defense-first, 24-year-old center, a second-round pick, and a fourth-round pick. Again, your mileage may vary, but this doesn't look much better than rolling the dice with Rantanen and going for their second Cup in the last year of MacKinnon's 20s.

    Now, we don't have much reason to panic that Kaprizov has a foot out the door. The Avalanche apparently committed to not hitting a price point in Leon Draisaitl's stratosphere -- in the range of $14 million. Wild owner Craig Leipold has affirmed a commitment not to be outspent on Kaprizov so that part of the equation appears solid.

    But if a deal doesn't materialize, then the Wild might be in a situation every bit as sticky as the Avs just were. Theoretically, Minnesota could have an advantage by moving early and trading Kaprizov before the season to get a bigger return based on an extra 45 games or so of their MVP-level winger.

    On the other hand, Rantanen possessed a nine-team no-trade list, allowing Colorado the leverage to negotiate with multiple teams. Kaprizov possesses a full no-move clause that has already kicked in, allowing him to dictate his landing spot. Unless Kaprizov would be willing to go to multiple potential bidders, that drives the return of a trade way down.

    So there's no reason to think a Kaprizov trade will land significantly more than what the Avs just got for Rantanen. The Wild might get a top-six forward or a top-four defenseman (though Minnesota's blueline is loaded when healthy), a depth forward, a couple of non-premium picks, and a bit of extra money to throw around on the free-agent market.

    Ironically, the only way to break out of that scenario is if Minnesota's worst nightmare comes to life: Kaprizov wants to go to the Chicago Blackhawks. As gross as it'd feel to send an MVP to a Division Rival, the Blackhawks don't have a Martin Necas to offer -- a relatively young, top-six forward. The only way to get value out of a team like them would be to target a prospect, with the dream perhaps being Mounds View native and current Minnesota Gophers speedster Oliver Moore.

    Even then, that amounts to a lottery ticket for a player who's been 40 goals in the bank. There's simply no winning a trade like that. Colorado just found it out, and if there was anyone out there silly enough to believe the Wild could sell high and invest in the future by trading Kaprizov, they just got a reality check. It's a Kaprizov Extension or Bust.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 2

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    11 minutes ago, OldDutchChip said:

    if canes are still in dealing mood - let's do boldy for svechnikov

    One could make an argument that Boldy is better, younger, and less expensive.

    Boldy is certainly having the better 24-25.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    One could make an argument that Boldy is better, younger, and less expensive.

    Boldy is certainly having the better 24-25.

    one could but they would be wrong. Svechnikov is a better player.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, OldDutchChip said:

    one could but they would be wrong. Svechnikov is a better player.

    The one thing he has going for him is the lacrosse goal. Other than that, I’d take Boldy.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Boldy is not consistent and shys away from any contact.  If they could get svechnikov and Tuch do it.  Do not get Boeser.  JT miller as well.  We needs 3-4 different forwards to make this team better.  We lack skill, size and depth

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    19 minutes ago, OldDutchChip said:

    one could but they would be wrong. Svechnikov is a better player.

    Looks like he throws the body a lot and also turns the puck over a lot.

    Svech had better seasons prior to this one and I have no idea why he's been less of a point scorer this year. Clearly a good PP scorer, but he is -5 for a team that is #2 in the conference and has 29 more goals scored than goals against this season.

    Boldy doesn't have any years on the negative side of the +/- ledger. Svech has drawn 6 more penalties and tallied a few more PP goals, but also taken 3 more penalties.

    Svech is getting 60% offensive zone starts compared to Boldy's <47%, but Boldy is tallying more points this season, and possibly rates as a better 2-way player. Boldy is well ahead on even strength scoring per 60 this season.

    Seem like they are pretty even and one could argue either way. In the last 4 years, Svech is +33 with nearly .84 points per game while Boldy is +29 with more than .85 PPG.

     

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 hours ago, OldDutchChip said:

    one could but they would be wrong. Svechnikov is a better player.

    Based on what? I think this is a case of thinking anyone's 2nd-3rd FWD is better than what we have because the team is in a rut and Boldy is in somewhat of a slump. Unless you watch every single Canes game and he's a jaw dropper every shift every night I think you're seeing other teams players through rose colored glasses.

    I'd rather have Boldy. HOWEVER, Boldy needs to be a tad more consistent and play his style of game and not try to be Kirill. Wish he would use the body a bit more like he did on Stone but Boldy is actually very good on the walls for not being a mauler. 

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Our top 6 isn't going to do squat shit if they do make the playoffs. NoNo, Zuccerallo, Rossi will get rag dolled all over the ice. Move Rossi and NoNo for some Muscle. Zuccerallo can play 4th line and PP1. Bring Jiricek up and trade Merril for future considerations. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 hours ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    Looks like he throws the body a lot and also turns the puck over a lot.

    Svech had better seasons prior to this one and I have no idea why he's been less of a point scorer this year. Clearly a good PP scorer, but he is -5 for a team that is #2 in the conference and has 29 more goals scored than goals against this season.

    Boldy doesn't have any years on the negative side of the +/- ledger. Svech has drawn 6 more penalties and tallied a few more PP goals, but also taken 3 more penalties.

    Svech is getting 60% offensive zone starts compared to Boldy's <47%, but Boldy is tallying more points this season, and possibly rates as a better 2-way player. Boldy is well ahead on even strength scoring per 60 this season.

    Seem like they are pretty even and one could argue either way. In the last 4 years, Svech is +33 with nearly .84 points per game while Boldy is +29 with more than .85 PPG.

     

    svechnikov is a more physical, more down hill type of a player and has just as much skills as boldy, if not more. yes he needs to control himself a bit more. and avoid Ovi.... and i see all these stats, but they don't take into account the knee injury that he came back from and should be used in tandem to good old eye test.... take out the numbers - and look at the way he plays - you have an amazing talent. it's not going to happen but i'd still take svechnikov any day before boldy. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 minutes ago, M_Nels said:

    Based on what? I think this is a case of thinking anyone's 2nd-3rd FWD is better than what we have because the team is in a rut and Boldy is in somewhat of a slump. Unless you watch every single Canes game and he's a jaw dropper every shift every night I think you're seeing other teams players through rose colored glasses.

    I'd rather have Boldy. HOWEVER, Boldy needs to be a tad more consistent and play his style of game and not try to be Kirill. Wish he would use the body a bit more like he did on Stone but Boldy is actually very good on the walls for not being a mauler. 

    i think you have not seen much of Svechnikov play and have a bit of a bias here (i have seen him play)

    but it's good - no one is trading us svechnikov so it's irrelevant

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, OldDutchChip said:

    i think you have not seen much of Svechnikov play and have a bit of a bias here (i have seen him play)

    but it's good - no one is trading us svechnikov so it's irrelevant

    I have not seen him in person no.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, M_Nels said:

    I have not seen him in person no.

    sorry you mean - not seen him play or in person "in person"? 🙂

    i really was impressed with him when he played us and then started paying attn during canes games and really liked what i saw. maybe the games that i did see was nota good rep of him as a player....

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    17 minutes ago, M_Nels said:

    I'd rather have Boldy. HOWEVER, Boldy needs to be a tad more consistent and play his style of game and not try to be Kirill. Wish he would use the body a bit more like he did on Stone but Boldy is actually very good on the walls for not being a mauler.

     I completely agree M nels. One thing i would add is Boldy is a year younger, has three less seasons in the NHL and has played more games per year than Svech. Svech habitually tends to be injured 20 games a season. In the future I think Boldy will be a more well rounded player whereas the oft injured Svech will end up as a one dimensional player to avoid getting hurt while playing. One for one trade, this is a loss for us IMO

    • Thanks 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 hours ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    Buffalo is looking to trade Cozens out for Pettersson. They are not looking to move Tuch. They could part with Zucker and his expiring contract.

    Buffalo wants to compete for playoffs next year, not go prospect heavy in a full rebuild.

    Huck, do you follow Buffalo regularly? I ask because some people have an Eastern Conference team as well as a Western Conference team. Everyone knows the Canes are my EC team. I don't follow them that closely but do follow them. 

    It would be interesting to know which guys follow other teams too.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 hours ago, OldDutchChip said:

    Carolina had the balls. Does Bill?

    Tlusky also had an ace in the hole, Aho. Since he and Rantanen are good friends he, I'm certain no evidence, consulted with Aho about the possibility of an extension. I would look for an extension coming before the end of the season. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    Huck, do you follow Buffalo regularly? I ask because some people have an Eastern Conference team as well as a Western Conference team. Everyone knows the Canes are my EC team. I don't follow them that closely but do follow them. 

    It would be interesting to know which guys follow other teams too.

    I do not follow them myself.  I went to look at them closely due to all of the Tuch talk here.  Some review of stories on the Athletic regarding trade deadline, some from writers for a Buffalo Sabres site.  What I shared was a short summation of what I was able to find from the folks who do follow the Sabres.  They could be wrong, but I haven't seen a single person affiliated with them discuss trading Tuch.

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 hours ago, OldDutchChip said:

    Landy is likely not coming back (at all). Nichushkin might though. 

    Even if Landeskog does come back, I think he'll be a shell of himself. Large guy who can't move. Even Reaves will be able to catch him.

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 hours ago, mnhockeyfan03 said:

    We lack skill, size and depth

    I'd like to add hunger to win on this list. Watching them play, there is a gear I just never seem to see the team hit. A few individuals do, but not the whole team. 

    While I sometimes pick on Zuccarello here, the last 2 games he's upped his game a lot. He doesn't throw the big hits, but he certainly was slipping hits and gaining loose pucks.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 hours ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    Clearly a good PP scorer, but he is -5 for a team that is #2 in the conference and has 29 more goals scored than goals against this season.

    Canes have had their top goalie out for awhile again this year, and goaltending problems down the line. They play a structured style, so this is 100% on the goaltending. I would consider this not necessarily being Svech's fault and he may have been on the ice during some of these bad goals. 

    Svech is a tiger, but my memory seems to think he's been hurt the last couple of years. I really like him as a player, but if I'm trading Boldy, I've got to have a Tkachuk. Svech is at that age where nagging injuries can keep coming. Boldy isn't at that age. I do see availability as an ability.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, mnfaninnc said:

    While I sometimes pick on Zuccarello here, the last 2 games he's upped his game a lot.

    I disagree, he has been a turnover machine. Against CGY he was trying to force and defer on too many passes leading to far too many 1 and dones in the o-zone. Not to mention a lot of them are high slot. They had Ek on that line and he is great behind the net, retrievals and net front, Kirill is no slouch in those departments either. Why not cycle it a little more to sustain more o-zone time?

    When Kirill was out he was more assertive with the puck and actually putting pucks on net. When he has an open look he HAS to take it and not try and thread a cross ice or behind the back blind pass that gets intercepted. I wouldn't even be upset if they took him on PP1 for a game.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    45 minutes ago, OldDutchChip said:

    i really was impressed with him when he played us and then started paying attn during canes games and really liked what i saw. maybe the games that i did see was nota good rep of him as a player....

    It is. When he's healthy, he's a real handful. Plays the game with skill and grit. He's got a little more fire than Boldy has at this point. If I were a Wild coach, Svechnikov would be some tape I'd be showing Boldy to model his game after. Boldy is big enough and should be strong enough to compete like Svech. Boldy tries to do too much fancy stuff, though instead of making the north simple play and blowing through a defender. I think Svech is also a little more selfish with shots and looks shot first, not to defer. 

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, M_Nels said:

    I disagree, he has been a turnover machine. Against CGY he was trying to force and defer on too many passes leading to far too many 1 and dones in the o-zone. Not to mention a lot of them are high slot. They had Ek on that line and he is great behind the net, retrievals and net front, Kirill is no slouch in those departments either.

    His battle level, to me, looked very good. I'll admit, I was not watching the turnovers and will likely have that on my mind next game. You are right on the PP, though, he did turnover a lot there, but so did almost everyone.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Should we talk about how many grade A opportunities Hartman has setup in the last handful of games? I believe the goalie robbed Jiricek on one of them, but Hartman has made some great passes for teammates to bury with a lot of open goal to shoot at, and has not been rewarded with an assist as often as he probably deserves.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    Canes have had their top goalie out for awhile again this year, and goaltending problems down the line. They play a structured style, so this is 100% on the goaltending. I would consider this not necessarily being Svech's fault and he may have been on the ice during some of these bad goals. 

    Svech is a tiger, but my memory seems to think he's been hurt the last couple of years. I really like him as a player, but if I'm trading Boldy, I've got to have a Tkachuk. Svech is at that age where nagging injuries can keep coming. Boldy isn't at that age. I do see availability as an ability.

    they are only a year apart 🙂  but i do agree with injury history. but that's life of a hockey player. he'll be back to being a target soon enough. 

    tkachuk at this point is just a dream. but svech....maybe boldy and kampulainen (for the finnish touch) can get it done? 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...