Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness
  • Should the 2024 Draft Change the Wild's Jake Middleton Plans?


    Image courtesy of Timothy T. Ludwig - USA TODAY Sports
    Tony Abbott

    It's incredibly difficult to anticipate an NHL team's needs years into the future. For example, last season, most fans believed the Minnesota Wild's defensive prospect pool was stacked. With Carson Lambos, Daemon Hunt, David Spacek, Ryan O'Rourke, and Kyle Masters in the AHL or turning pro, it looked like the Wild had a future logjam on their hands.

    After those five defensemen struggled to gain traction with the Iowa Wild this year, Minnesota suddenly didn't have enough defensemen, to the point where the Wild are reportedly set to ink a four-year, $4 million-plus AAV contract extension for Jake Middleton on Monday. The deal would cement Jonas Brodin and Middleton on the left side of Minnesota's defense through the 2027-28 season.

    If the Wild kept Middleton under contract for five more years (including the last season of his current deal), it would signal a lack of faith in their prospect pool. Brodin and Middleton would ensure that only one of Lambos, Hunt, O'Rourke, or Jack Peart could assume top-six NHL minutes. Suppose Minnesota believes just one (or zero) will pan out, then it might make sense for Middleton to hold that spot down for a half-decade.

    But again, it's tough to anticipate the needs of an NHL team, as they could change in a weekend. Days before free agency, Minnesota added two major left-shot defensemen to their organization in first-round pick Zeev Buium and fourth-rounder Aron Kiviharju. These signings change the long-term outlook for Minnesota at the position, and they should change their plans with Middleton.

    The Wild have a potential No. 1 defenseman on the left side of the blueline in Buium, and he should be NHL-ready extremely soon. He already led the NCAA in time on ice and points from a defenseman and won a National Championship. The Wild are having him play his sophomore year at Denver University, but how much more will he be able to accomplish after that?

    Buium may be in the NHL at the end of this upcoming season before Middleton's current contract expires. With Buium's big-play ability, solid defense, and minute-munching, he could supplant Middleton on the depth chart for a playoff run. If not next year, then soon afterward, which would give Minnesota a third-pairing defenseman making $4 million or more.

    It might not even be long until Kiviharju can play in the NHL. He's been in and out of Finnish Liiga since September 2022, when he was 16. If he gets back to his pre-draft year trajectory, he could easily be ready for NHL action by the start of the 2026-27 season. And who knows, with a dominant season in Liiga, perhaps he could even push for a spot in 2025-26 as Buium breaks into the NHL.

    Then there's the possibility that one of Lambos, Peart, Hunt, or O'Rourke put it together and become NHL-caliber. After adding Kiviharju to the mix, odds are one of them will be worthy of displacing Middleton long before his reported four-year deal expires.

    The Wild will certainly cite "cost certainty" if and when they ink Middleton to an extension. But what makes Minnesota certain they'll want to pay Middleton $4 million in four years? Or three? Or two? 

    image.png

    Middleton succeeded in his time in Minnesota as a defensive specialist alongside Jared Spurgeon. Last year, we discovered what happens when you take Spurgeon away from Middleton, and it wasn't pretty. Suddenly, his calling card defense looked a lot less effective. He went from controlling 61.9% of the expected goals share in 155 minutes with Spurgeon to 47.8% in 802 minutes with Brock Faber.

    The idea of blocking off a roster spot for four years with an expensive, third-pairing defenseman is already a sketchy proposition. Doing it for one whose success seems to rely on another player (Spurgeon, whose contract will expire halfway through Middleton's likely extension) simply seems like bad roster management.

    Signing Middleton this week would echo many of the problems from the extensions the Wild handed out last offseason. Namely: Why sign it now, a year before Minnesota has to make a decision? Why tie up that flexibility in a role player before getting any of the information they'll learn about their prospects next year?

    By next May, Minnesota will have a great handle on Buium's NHL timetable, and that's if they don't already have him on the roster. They'll get to see how well Kiviharju bounces back from his injury and handles a full-time role in Liiga. Their AHL defensemen (who are all 23 and under) will have another season of development and the possibility of taking major strides.

    Middleton isn't going anywhere and isn't getting any more expensive next season. They can wait to see what they have in their prospect pool, then make a more informed decision with a term tailored to their needs.

    It's hard to see Bill Guerin deviating from his plan, particularly for one of his beloved veterans, but plans can and should change with new information. The Wild planned on signing Middleton before getting two stud left defensemen in Buium and Kiviharju. Now that they have those in-house, they must adopt a wait-and-see posture.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 7

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    2 hours ago, FredJohnson said:

    Who? And for how much?

    Ilya Lyubushkin just signed for 3x3.3,  Tanev, who is SIGNIFICANTLY better than Middleton just signed for 4.5 million a year. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    30 minutes ago, Patrick said:

    Ilya Lyubushkin just signed for 3x3.3,  Tanev, who is SIGNIFICANTLY better than Middleton just signed for 4.5 million a year. 

    Lyubushkin signed with the Stars...the team that many (most?) thought would win the Cup this year.

    Tanev is 34 and signed a 6 year deal. P r e t t y sure that deal won't age well.

    We're not a preferred destination (yet). 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, FredJohnson said:

    Lyubushkin signed with the Stars...the team that many (most?) thought would win the Cup this year.

    Tanev is 34 and signed a 6 year deal. P r e t t y sure that deal won't age well.

    We're not a preferred destination (yet). 

    I looked for 2 minutes and came up with 2 examples. Ian Cole is another. The point still stands.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 hours ago, Patrick said:

    I looked for 2 minutes and came up with 2 examples. Ian Cole is another. The point still stands.

    You didn't name a better player we can actually sign. The question still stands.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, FredJohnson said:

    You didn't name a better player we can actually sign. The question still stands.

    That wasn't the question and you know it. Incidentally, Tanev IS a better player.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    18 minutes ago, Patrick said:

    That wasn't the question and you know it. Incidentally, Tanev IS a better player.

    You originally posted:

    "I'dsay resigning Middleton would be borderline brain dead. Players like Middleton are available every free agency and trade deadline. There is zero reason to sign him now and plenty of reasons not to."

    "You didn't name a better player we can actually sign." We're 2-3 years from competing and don't have enough cap to overpay for free agents to entice them to sign here. Midds is probably the best we can get right now. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, FredJohnson said:

    You originally posted:

    "I'dsay resigning Middleton would be borderline brain dead. Players like Middleton are available every free agency and trade deadline. There is zero reason to sign him now and plenty of reasons not to."

    "You didn't name a better player we can actually sign." We're 2-3 years from competing and don't have enough cap to overpay for free agents to entice them to sign here. Midds is probably the best we can get right now. 

    Reading comprehension is obviously not a strength for you.  The guys I named were free agents and thus "available".  😂😂😂

    • Sad 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Kinda changing the subject since MN didn't sign the older more better Tanev but the younger more mustachey Midds.

    What's the deal with the Wild's top 7 defenseman? NHL experience between Bogo, Brodin, Chisholm, Faber, Merrill, Middleton, and Spurgeon. Three rightys four leftys. When Merrill & Bogo expire this year MN will look to Buium and their AHL team for replacements.

    It's plausible Buium could join the Wild after college but if not MN will have to wrap up their season with this group where Merrill is arguably the 7th D-man. Between now and then, things can change and injuries can happen but if Bogo & Merrill don't hang around that gives MN five leftys if you include Buium. 

    That's an indication that Bogo, if solid this year could be back. If not, will the Wild need a right shot D? Lambos is a lefty, Hunt too, but Spacek shoots right. All three guys are ~ 6' and 190lbs and almost no NHL experience. Will Spurgeon be back to his old self and what happens beyond this year is interesting. 

    How will the pairings look down the line?

    Faber & Brodin can be a top pairing. 

    Spurgeon and Midds have had success but are they a top pairing? 

    Finally what do you do with Chisholm Hunt, Lambos, Spacek, and Buium? Seems logical to keep Bogo if he's still goin good and roll with Chisholm on the left side. Problem I kinda foresee is, what if Buium is ready to go or Bogo isn't??? That would give ya too many LD or not enough RD.

    Now Chisholm is listed as being capable as a RD but he's a left shot. Does this mean a pairing with Buium is possible or do the Wild need to juggle pairings? Do they need to move Spurgeon or a left shot prospect to bring in a bigger right-handed player like a Bogo who can last more than Spurgeon's aging contract or the Bogo 1-year deals? The newest Finnish RD who shoots right is S. Soini but he's not gonna be NHL ready if Spacek isn't even close. 

    Kinda wonder what the Wild see happening with Buium? How would the Wild look with these pairs and are they realistic when the penalties drop off with Spurge or does MN need to find a RD in the coming year? Thinking out loud and guessing these pairs could have some balance of offense and defense on the back end. Size or snarly toughness is not amazing but it's a nice group.

    Brodin - Faber

    Chisholm - Spurgeon

    Middleton - Buium

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Depth chart. Meaning of all the defenseman in the organization, some are not really viable at the NHL level today for various reasons.

    Some could be sooner than later but based on who's healthy now and who is under contract, the seven are the top group most likely to be considered for next season's pairings.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Protec said:

    Kinda changing the subject since MN didn't sign the older more better Tanev but the younger more mustachey Midds.

    What's the deal with the Wild's top 7 defenseman? NHL experience between Bogo, Brodin, Chisholm, Faber, Merrill, Middleton, and Spurgeon. Three rightys four leftys. When Merrill & Bogo expire this year MN will look to Buium and their AHL team for replacements.

    It's plausible Buium could join the Wild after college but if not MN will have to wrap up their season with this group where Merrill is arguably the 7th D-man. Between now and then, things can change and injuries can happen but if Bogo & Merrill don't hang around that gives MN five leftys if you include Buium. 

    That's an indication that Bogo, if solid this year could be back. If not, will the Wild need a right shot D? Lambos is a lefty, Hunt too, but Spacek shoots right. All three guys are ~ 6' and 190lbs and almost no NHL experience. Will Spurgeon be back to his old self and what happens beyond this year is interesting. 

    How will the pairings look down the line?

    Faber & Brodin can be a top pairing. 

    Spurgeon and Midds have had success but are they a top pairing? 

    Finally what do you do with Chisholm Hunt, Lambos, Spacek, and Buium? Seems logical to keep Bogo if he's still goin good and roll with Chisholm on the left side. Problem I kinda foresee is, what if Buium is ready to go or Bogo isn't??? That would give ya too many LD or not enough RD.

    Now Chisholm is listed as being capable as a RD but he's a left shot. Does this mean a pairing with Buium is possible or do the Wild need to juggle pairings? Do they need to move Spurgeon or a left shot prospect to bring in a bigger right-handed player like a Bogo who can last more than Spurgeon's aging contract or the Bogo 1-year deals? The newest Finnish RD who shoots right is S. Soini but he's not gonna be NHL ready if Spacek isn't even close. 

    Kinda wonder what the Wild see happening with Buium? How would the Wild look with these pairs and are they realistic when the penalties drop off with Spurge or does MN need to find a RD in the coming year? Thinking out loud and guessing these pairs could have some balance of offense and defense on the back end. Size or snarly toughness is not amazing but it's a nice group.

    Brodin - Faber

    Chisholm - Spurgeon

    Middleton - Buium

    Lots to digest here.  It helps me understand why mids got extension.  I think Mids is stapled to spurge as long as spurge is in lineup.  One of either Brodin or Faber should sheppard Z-nith when he arrives.  Mids is not equipped for this job IMO.  Bogo obviously a placeholder for one more year in hopes that Lam-O-Hunt can win that role in next year.  Merrill needs to go soon.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I see Beev coming in on the left side and being a good fit with a guy like Bogo. He's a stay at home guy, hard, and has experience. He plays the right side but I'm not sure he's the mentor. More of a protector for a rookie.

    I see the Wild looking for a left shot PP-QB that would give them two different looking PP-units. Zzz's-nuts would do nicely in that role.

    What about Chisholm though? Is he gonna establish himself for that role this year? Da Buoy was unexpected and probably more NHL ready than other defenders who were available.(Yakemchuk,Dickinson,Parekh) You could guess MN didn't expect to get Buium but now they technically have a good problem. 

    That is how do you plan around this defense group? The top 7-8 on the depth chart that is. IA needs good defense true, but only 6-7 guys are gonna play consistently for the big club. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, Patrick said:

    Reading comprehension is obviously not a strength for you.  The guys I named were free agents and thus "available".  😂😂😂

    Okay...they didn't want to sign with us or signed for term we didn't (shouldn't) want. Thus what "available" means. Do you think we can make Lyubushkin, Cole, Tanev or others sign here? How attractive do you think the Wild is for free agents?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...