Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness
  • Should the 2024 Draft Change the Wild's Jake Middleton Plans?


    Image courtesy of Timothy T. Ludwig - USA TODAY Sports
    Tony Abbott

    It's incredibly difficult to anticipate an NHL team's needs years into the future. For example, last season, most fans believed the Minnesota Wild's defensive prospect pool was stacked. With Carson Lambos, Daemon Hunt, David Spacek, Ryan O'Rourke, and Kyle Masters in the AHL or turning pro, it looked like the Wild had a future logjam on their hands.

    After those five defensemen struggled to gain traction with the Iowa Wild this year, Minnesota suddenly didn't have enough defensemen, to the point where the Wild are reportedly set to ink a four-year, $4 million-plus AAV contract extension for Jake Middleton on Monday. The deal would cement Jonas Brodin and Middleton on the left side of Minnesota's defense through the 2027-28 season.

    If the Wild kept Middleton under contract for five more years (including the last season of his current deal), it would signal a lack of faith in their prospect pool. Brodin and Middleton would ensure that only one of Lambos, Hunt, O'Rourke, or Jack Peart could assume top-six NHL minutes. Suppose Minnesota believes just one (or zero) will pan out, then it might make sense for Middleton to hold that spot down for a half-decade.

    But again, it's tough to anticipate the needs of an NHL team, as they could change in a weekend. Days before free agency, Minnesota added two major left-shot defensemen to their organization in first-round pick Zeev Buium and fourth-rounder Aron Kiviharju. These signings change the long-term outlook for Minnesota at the position, and they should change their plans with Middleton.

    The Wild have a potential No. 1 defenseman on the left side of the blueline in Buium, and he should be NHL-ready extremely soon. He already led the NCAA in time on ice and points from a defenseman and won a National Championship. The Wild are having him play his sophomore year at Denver University, but how much more will he be able to accomplish after that?

    Buium may be in the NHL at the end of this upcoming season before Middleton's current contract expires. With Buium's big-play ability, solid defense, and minute-munching, he could supplant Middleton on the depth chart for a playoff run. If not next year, then soon afterward, which would give Minnesota a third-pairing defenseman making $4 million or more.

    It might not even be long until Kiviharju can play in the NHL. He's been in and out of Finnish Liiga since September 2022, when he was 16. If he gets back to his pre-draft year trajectory, he could easily be ready for NHL action by the start of the 2026-27 season. And who knows, with a dominant season in Liiga, perhaps he could even push for a spot in 2025-26 as Buium breaks into the NHL.

    Then there's the possibility that one of Lambos, Peart, Hunt, or O'Rourke put it together and become NHL-caliber. After adding Kiviharju to the mix, odds are one of them will be worthy of displacing Middleton long before his reported four-year deal expires.

    The Wild will certainly cite "cost certainty" if and when they ink Middleton to an extension. But what makes Minnesota certain they'll want to pay Middleton $4 million in four years? Or three? Or two? 

    image.png

    Middleton succeeded in his time in Minnesota as a defensive specialist alongside Jared Spurgeon. Last year, we discovered what happens when you take Spurgeon away from Middleton, and it wasn't pretty. Suddenly, his calling card defense looked a lot less effective. He went from controlling 61.9% of the expected goals share in 155 minutes with Spurgeon to 47.8% in 802 minutes with Brock Faber.

    The idea of blocking off a roster spot for four years with an expensive, third-pairing defenseman is already a sketchy proposition. Doing it for one whose success seems to rely on another player (Spurgeon, whose contract will expire halfway through Middleton's likely extension) simply seems like bad roster management.

    Signing Middleton this week would echo many of the problems from the extensions the Wild handed out last offseason. Namely: Why sign it now, a year before Minnesota has to make a decision? Why tie up that flexibility in a role player before getting any of the information they'll learn about their prospects next year?

    By next May, Minnesota will have a great handle on Buium's NHL timetable, and that's if they don't already have him on the roster. They'll get to see how well Kiviharju bounces back from his injury and handles a full-time role in Liiga. Their AHL defensemen (who are all 23 and under) will have another season of development and the possibility of taking major strides.

    Middleton isn't going anywhere and isn't getting any more expensive next season. They can wait to see what they have in their prospect pool, then make a more informed decision with a term tailored to their needs.

    It's hard to see Bill Guerin deviating from his plan, particularly for one of his beloved veterans, but plans can and should change with new information. The Wild planned on signing Middleton before getting two stud left defensemen in Buium and Kiviharju. Now that they have those in-house, they must adopt a wait-and-see posture.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 7

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    I'm not against either plan.  The thing that works in Middleton's favor is Spurgeon and Bogo's contracts are both going away sooner rather than later.  Bogo is that MoJo stopgap length, and lord knows what Spurgeon's health situation will be like.  I think Guerin is willing to play it safe and say, "Middleton has size, is relatively young (28-32 for the span of 4 years isn't the worst), and is at worst a viable Top 4 with the right situation.

    The cap going up hurts the plan less than it would normally.  Guerin has shown he's playing a waiting game with prospects.  I also believe he's going to try and stagger contracts out of things are less crowded.  I doubt Guerin wants to go into another off-season with 4-5 2nd-3rd line guys up for contracts.  This year is one of those lucky breaks were anyone re-signing are just depth pieces.  1-2 core contracts at a time probably makes things more palatable.

    Guerin wouldn't be considering a Middleton extension if he wasn't valuable or didn't bring something other players are lacking.  Iowa had a rough season.  Buium may or may not be lightning in a bottle like Faber and Rossi were.

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I couldn't agree more. In fact, barring something extreme like Spurgeon retiring, I'd say resigning Middleton would be borderline brain dead. Players like Middleton are available every free agency and trade deadline. There is zero reason to sign him now and plenty of reasons not to.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Patrick said:

    There is zero reason to sign him now and plenty of reasons not to.

    This article made me aware that there’s zero urgency to sign mids this offseason.  It would be evidence that Guerin learned nothing last off season.  Mids is our only top 4 d man with size so that’s valuable, but what if mids regresses again next season, or gets hurt.  He’s slightly above average player and there’s a stock pile of Ian Cole’s available for 2.5M/yr every offseason.  Why award mids with $ AND term? 

    #don’tbedumbBill

    • Like 5
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I don’t think it changes the plan. Middsy is just hitting his prime. I thought we wanted size throughout the roster?

    Middleton is exactly the kind of 3rd pairing defenseman you want for a Cup run. $4M is a little much but idk I don’t think it’s a death-knell for the roster considering if we have Zeev and Yurov and Heidt they’ll all be on ELCs at that time anyway. 

    Plus guys like Spurgy and Zuccy and Foligno will begin falling off the books as they get replaced by those ELC players anyhow. Also the cap rising lowers the impact.

    Edited by B1GKappa97
    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Middleton is a known commodity, with decent size and age. Spurgeon is closing in on the end of his career. Brodin will be getting closer the three years. Assume a couple seasons pass, Spurgeon retires or is possibly moved on… Brodin will be upper mid-30s and probably not any less injury resilient than he has been recently. Faber & Buium… Mids/Brodin and as many as 3 additional spots. That’s assuming that a lot of the pipeline guys develop into legitimate NHLers, and they should still be partnering veteran defenders. Middleton at 31 and roughly $4m is a pretty solid 3rd pairing vet.

    Guerin shouldn’t put trade protections in. Mids is exactly the sort of defender that teams look for in to fill out their blue line, so he’ll likely be able to be moved if they need to in the future.

    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    Mids is our only top 4 d man with size so that’s valuable, but what if mids regresses again next season, or gets hurt.

    Middleton's deal would run him through his 29-33 years. I could see trade protection the 1st 2 years of the deal. I don't think Middleton will regress. At the beginning of the year, I thought he had actually added speed.

    As for the injury aspect, Middleton played hurt a great deal of the season. Why play hurt? Because there was nobody else to turn to. Same thing with Faber who played hurt down the stretch. He should get some credit for that!

    Why do we need Middleton? Size. Has anyone noticed the size we have developing? Top of the class middleweights. A team needs the big guys to clear things out, specifically on the PK. We need 3 big guys on the roster, the 3rd can be D7. Merrill is tall but plays like a lightweight. When he tries to get physical, he just doesn't know how very well. 

    Since this is a team game with many different roles, in house, we simply do not have a Middleton replacement ready. It's also worth remembering that defenders, especially larger defenders, can play in their 30s without much fall off. I'd say Middleton will be solid until 36, just due to the size factor. That might not be top 4 solid, but roster solid. 

    I do question the $4m, however. Pewter's right, a 3rd pairing guy is worth about $2.5m IMO. So, why not just make it a 2 X $4m and then renegotiate? Of course, if Shooter is looking at the cap trends, he may see the cap increasing to the point where $4m is the new $2.5m for such a player. 

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Looks like we have a surplus of young D that need to play, and regardless of how I feel about the path taken, I’d rather see our young D get the chance and compete (sometimes they impress if given a chance!!) rather than hand out 4 mil for next 3/4 year on Midds & see him blocking these prospects

    Fauauak Let’s See what they got! Give them an open spot to shoot for, let Midds walk 

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    22 minutes ago, OldDutchChip said:

    Looks like we have a surplus of young D that need to play, and regardless of how I feel about the path taken, I’d rather see our young D get the chance and compete (sometimes they impress if given a chance!!) rather than hand out 4 mil for next 3/4 year on Midds & see him blocking these prospects

    Fauauak Let’s See what they got! Give them an open spot to shoot for, let Midds walk 

     

    At first I thought you were some old, salty, angry man. But I am starting to agree with your insight on satisfying our star Kirill and I agree with giving our defensive prospects a chance. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, Sam said:

    At first I thought you were some old, salty, angry man. But I am starting to agree with your insight on satisfying our star Kirill and I agree with giving our defensive prospects a chance. 

    cheers my friend! 🍻 may tomorrow bring lots of joy to the wild nation!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 hours ago, OldDutchChip said:

    Looks like we have a surplus of young D that need to play, and regardless of how I feel about the path taken, I’d rather see our young D get the chance and compete (sometimes they impress if given a chance!!) rather than hand out 4 mil for next 3/4 year on Midds & see him blocking these prospects

    Fauauak Let’s See what they got! Give them an open spot to shoot for, let Midds walk 

     

    If he's blocking them, then they aren't actually better. Right? 

    It's not like he kept Faber out of the lineup. Or Chisholm. 

    • Thanks 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    18 hours ago, WildOnrario said:

    Can we not just sign players to a 1 year maybe 4 mill  deal with no trade pertection or is it really so bad to let him walk

    Why would he sign that? It takes both sides to come to a contract agreement. 

    Most players prefer to have some security in their deals, rather than the potential to get traded off at any point and separated from their families. I doubt Middsy wants to accept an offer to play year to year. 

    4-years isn't terrible while we wait for more development from our blueline prospects tbh. None of the AHL guys seem close anyway and Zeev is probably a season or two away at least. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, B1GKappa97 said:

    If he's blocking them, then they aren't actually better. Right? 

    It's not like he kept Faber out of the lineup. Or Chisholm. 

    he is blocking them by being there as a waste of space that has to play.  get it?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    57 minutes ago, OldDutchChip said:

    he is blocking them by being there as a waste of space that has to play.  get it?

    Shit we had Goligoski and Merrill and Mermis ahead of the young guys.  They were the waste of space.  Hunt should have played over them last year.

    BTW, it isn't going to happen but we should bring in Zadorov like you said.  I would rather pay him than pay Middleton.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 minutes ago, Will D. Ness said:

    Shit we had Goligoski and Merrill and Mermis ahead of the young guys.  They were the waste of space.  Hunt should have played over them last year.

    BTW, it isn't going to happen but we should bring in Zadorov like you said.  I would rather pay him than pay Middleton.

    hell yeah, zadorov is still unsigned!

    and true that - Goli Merrill Mermis, now i am waiting for us to sign Ekman Larson to 3 year and Midds and what is that going to tell our young D prospect? 🤔

    common Marchy - sign with us! 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, B1GKappa97 said:

    If they can't beat out Middleton, they probably shouldn't be playing ahead of him. 

    how many games in the big club had Hunt, O'Rourke, Peart, Spacek, lambos, Johanson, Masters? you don't think giving them an honest trial would make sense over locking up Midds for the next 3 years? or what's going to happen if one or two of them show up and we have no place for them? but they can't even show up cause now we have no room for them!

    brodin-faber spurge-midds chissy-bogo zeev too. where are you going to play them? back in minors. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 minutes ago, OldDutchChip said:

    how many games in the big club had Hunt, O'Rourke, Peart, Spacek, lambos, Johanson, Masters? you don't think giving them an honest trial would make sense over locking up Midds for the next 3 years? or what's going to happen if one or two of them show up and we have no place for them? but they can't even show up cause now we have no room for them!

    brodin-faber spurge-midds chissy-bogo zeev too. where are you going to play them? back in minors. 

    The fact some of those guys are struggling to have success in the AHL doesn't exactly scream 'GIVE THEM A SHOT' in the NHL to me. If one or two show up and we don't have a place, then you can trade them off for a different need. I don't think that we're going to suddenly see them all blossom into top-4 players. 

    I mean compare Chisholm's AHL success to those guys' and then take note of how he has still struggled on NHL ice despite the higher AHL production.

    Also, injuries happen you know. There will be opportunities for some of these guys to turn into the 6th or 7th Dman over the next couple seasons thanks to Merril and Bogo falling off the books next year and the following season also. And at that point, if they haven't traded him off yet, Spurgy will be on the final year of his deal. 

    Maybe we can worry about Middleton blocking one of these guys when one of them actually shows he'd be an improvement. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, B1GKappa97 said:

    The fact some of those guys are struggling to have success in the AHL doesn't exactly scream 'GIVE THEM A SHOT' in the NHL to me. If one or two show up and we don't have a place, then you can trade them off for a different need. I don't think that we're going to suddenly see them all blossom into top-4 players. 

    I mean compare Chisholm's AHL success to those guys' and then take note of how he has still struggled on NHL ice despite the higher AHL production.

    Also, injuries happen you know. There will be opportunities for some of these guys to turn into the 6th or 7th Dman over the next couple seasons thanks to Merril and Bogo falling off the books next year and the following season also. And at that point, if they haven't traded him off yet, Spurgy will be on the final year of his deal. 

    Maybe we can worry about Middleton blocking one of these guys when one of them actually shows he'd be an improvement. 

    to say that none of these D prospects merit a closer look at the big club speaks highly about the horrible scouting that we have. why should we have any faith in what judy is doing then? none of his D prospects can play even as a third pair in NHL yet? really? not even for the club that will play for bottom 2-3 spots in the division (per my optimistic outlook)?  if that's the case - then you fire judy right now. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, OldDutchChip said:

    to say that none of these D prospects merit a closer look at the big club speaks highly about the horrible scouting that we have. why should we have any faith in what judy is doing then? none of his D prospects can play even as a third pair in NHL yet? really? not even for the club that will play for bottom 2-3 spots in the division (per my optimistic outlook)?  if that's the case - then you fire judy right now. 

    Fire him 'cause his late 1st, 2nd round and 3rd round defensemen aren't 3rd pair guys within 3 years?

    Nobody is saying they won't get there, just that they aren't there yet and its unlikely they'll have multiple prospects ready for that by the '25-'26 season to the point where they shouldn't resign a Middleton. 

     

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, B1GKappa97 said:

    Fire him 'cause his late 1st, 2nd round and 3rd round defensemen aren't 3rd pair guys within 3 years?

    Nobody is saying they won't get there, just that they aren't there yet and its unlikely they'll have multiple prospects ready for that by the '25-'26 season to the point where they shouldn't resign a Middleton. 

     

    he hit on nothing. yes fire him.

    argh preds - Marchy, Skjei, and Stamy. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 6/30/2024 at 8:33 AM, Patrick said:

    I couldn't agree more. In fact, barring something extreme like Spurgeon retiring, I'd say resigning Middleton would be borderline brain dead. Players like Middleton are available every free agency and trade deadline. There is zero reason to sign him now and plenty of reasons not to.

    Who? And for how much?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If the Wild kept Middleton under contract for five more years (including the last season of his current deal), it would signal a lack of faith in their prospect pool.


    It's also the need for his size even if he doesn't use it well enough.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hoping for an educated, intelligent, well negotiated, nicely timed contract that extends Mids. Give me that at the right price and I’m in. The Wild need to be known as a team that treats its players fairly but the players need to say thanks by compete level and loyalty. We’ve seen that abused by some players recently ( allegedly). Every organization needs an elite, creative and well informed contract negotiator. Wild show me what ya got. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...