Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness
  • Rossi Will Start Training Camp Still Looking For A Prime Opportunity


    Image courtesy of © Matt Blewett - USA TODAY Sports
    Tony Abbott

    Minnesota Wild fans don't have to wait until training camp opens on Wednesday to figure out one of the biggest questions of the offseason. What will happen with Marco Rossi? is the unknown of the offseason, and one which their playoff hopes hinge upon. 

    We got the start of that answer on Monday, when Dean Evason sat down with The Athletic's Michael Russo to discuss the state of the team entering camp. "He'll start with Marcus Foligno and Freddy Gaudreau," Evason announced, confirming that he'd begin the year outside of a top-six role. "We think that would be a very strong line."

    It might read as a blow to those in the fanbase who'd like to see what the highly-touted center -- one EP Rinkside ranked as a Top-25 prospect last month -- get a true shot in the lineup. But while Evason's lineup at the start of training camp remained largely intact through opening night, Evason is gesturing towards flexibility. In response to a question about moving Rossi up, he told Russo, "Maybe there's a position where Rossi, [Marcus Johansson, and Matt Boldy] play together [on the second line]. ... There's certainly some areas for us to tinker with."

    That was the first real hint that the Wild's well-documented reluctance to elevate Rossi into a position to succeed may be coming to an end. Even as such, he's starting the year once again with the task of having to prove he can score points on a lower line before moving to the top-six role Minnesota drafted him to fill.

    It should be noted that Minnesota's lack of cap space made it impossible for the Wild's center situation to get any better. Arguably, it got worse. Joel Eriksson Ek and Ryan Hartman remain, but Sam Steel moved on in free agency. Steel had filled the role for two months while Hartman was demoted, then injured. On paper, it makes little sense that Hartman would get priority in that kind of rule over Rossi. One is a 29-year-old pending free agent, and the other is a top-10 pick who represents a large chunk of the franchise's long-term hopes.

    Again, the path to a top-six role appears more open this year, and it isn't unusual to see teams break in their prospects on lower lines. They technically did that with Boldy as a rookie on a line that included Gaudreau. So is this a big deal?

    Arguably, yes, because Rossi doesn't need to break into the NHL. He did that with Minnesota last year. Rossi played 19 games and held his own except for one problem: He couldn't score. It was a problem that the Wild created because they didn't put in the best position to score. He spent most of his minutes on the third- and fourth-lines.

    Rossi is probably in a better position to succeed than last year. If Gaudreau and Foligno are healthy, they'll provide their usual steady two-way play to go with Rossi's. That didn't bear out in limited minutes last year. But after an offseason where Rossi has reportedly put on 15 pounds of muscle, it could well be the making of strong third line.

    But is he in the best position to score, which is the thing the Wild want for him to earn his way into a higher role? It's hard to make that case.

    Gaudreau and Foligno are both fan favorites who stepped into productive seasons in their late 20s that few saw coming from them. Foligno had a career-high 23 goals and 42 points in 2021-22, a year Gaudreau set a personal best with 44 points, then followed up with a career-high 19 goals last year. Both players make their teammates better defensively.

    How much better they make their teammates offensively is a murkier question. Foligno is aggressive on the forecheck and will bang home rebounds, which theoretically helps Rossi's assist totals. But even in a year where Gaudreau scored a career-high in goals, he didn't help anyone push the pace at 5-on-5 last season. Foligno and Gaudreau rarely shoot. Foligno fired only 5.1 shots per hour at 5-on-5 and Gaudreau only 6.4 times per hour over the past two seasons. That definitely isn't good for the assist totals.

    The idea might be that Rossi would have no choice but to take over offensively with those two linemates, and maybe that will work. But that sounds like a recipe for a slow start, which Rossi spoke of at length as being a drain on his confidence last year. That strategy also didn't work for Boldy last season. He was mired in a deep slump before getting top-six help in Eriksson Ek and Johansson late in the season.

    Seeing Foligno and Gaudreau at their best in the recent past might assuage concerns, but the red flags are still there. If we as a fan base take away our attachment to "Moose" and "Freddy Hockey," would we be as confident in the success of this line? Imagine instead the Wild traded Foligno and Gaudreau to a time machine and got back a 30-year-old Eric Fehr and a 31-year-old Paul Byron. Chances are, fans would be much more nervous heading into the season.

    Why those two names? They're the most similar skaters to Foligno and Gaudreau, respectively, per Evolving-Hockey's Skater Similarity tool. Contrast that to Boldy's "third line," which boasted an 80-point scorer in Kevin Fiala. Boldy was lower in the lineup, but in a great position to score, and he did. And again, in the first half last year, when his linemates resembled more typical third-liners, he struggled.

    The hope is that Evason gives Rossi opportunities to skate higher in the lineup in the preseason. If so, Rossi needs to grab onto that chance and not let go, because the alternative puts him at much greater risk of an underwhelming season. Luckily, Rossi seems to understand the stakes. He spent this summer in Minnesota working out with the team and getting stronger. It appears he's done everything he can to make sure he seizes the moment. If that kind of determination translates to his play on the ice, all he needs is that moment to present itself.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    This is disappointing to see Foligno projected on this line. Not the line that is going to help Rossi succeed. If they really think by putting two wings that are not looking to score with Rossi, it will make it worse and he's going to try to do to much instead of relax and let the game come to him.

    I have some confidence in Freddy to help balance the line, but Moose with Rossi who depends on break outs with speed? Not gonna happen with Moose tracks. Why not put Duhaime in this line to generate more offense? This is just DE being DE, gotta stay (with what doesn't work). 

    The best of all the ideas I heard was putting him with Boldy as they have previous chemistry, but why screw up another line that was hot last year. This would mean Ek moving to 1C, which again, didnt work last year.

    This is the perfect example of setting Rossi up to fail again by forcing a square peg in a round hole. DE says flexibility, I say same ol' stuff, different season.

    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I hope Rossi succeeds, but I don't think the future of the Wild is dependent upon it him reaching even Granlund levels of success.

    Quote

    represents a large chunk of the franchise's long-term hopes.

    Khusnutdinov, Yurov, Wallstedt, Faber, Lambos, and the rest of the prospects on the way seem just as important, if not more so, to the long-term success of the Wild.

    • Like 1
    • Confused 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 minutes ago, vonlonster67 said:

    This is the perfect example of setting Rossi up to fail again by forcing a square peg in a round hole. DE says flexibility, I say same ol' stuff, different season.

    Seems like the right move for balancing lines and being hard to play against.

    They'll play around with different options, and likely give Rossi PP2 minutes to allow for scoring there, but Gaudreau has shown an ability to score when setup in high danger situations, and Foligno has scored a bit in the past. If Rossi is a great skater and passer, he should be able to help them succeed.

    If it doesn't work, they'll pivot to other options they tinker with along the way, but who else would you put between Gaudreau and Foligno to help them reach 20 goals in the upcoming season?

    Also have to consider who they are going to pair on PP and PK opportunities when they are formulating what lines they'd like to try 5v5.

    They exceeded preseason expectations each of the last 2 seasons, so "same ol' stuff" might not be the worst thing to some fans. If they can enter a postseason healthy, results could change significantly from doing the same.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    50 minutes ago, vonlonster67 said:

    The best of all the ideas I heard was putting him with Boldy as they have previous chemistry, but why screw up another line that was hot last year. This would mean Ek moving to 1C, which again, didnt work last year.

    Ek did not play on the #1 line last season, he played on the Kaprizov line for a few games early in 2021. The line didn't click, but, since then, they have played together fairly successfully on PP1. I would say that it deserves another look at some point. 

    If Hartsy gets off to a slow start, why not move Ek up, Rossi up, and Hartsy down to Foligno and Gaudreau? I, for one, would like to see Ek with Kaprizov and Zuccarello again.

    • Like 5
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    45 minutes ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    I hope Rossi succeeds, but I don't think the future of the Wild is dependent upon it him reaching even Granlund levels of success.

    Khusnutdinov, Yurov, Wallstedt, Faber, Lambos, and the rest of the prospects on the way seem just as important, if not more so, to the long-term success of the Wild.

    Agreed, but are we setting up Rossi to fail with his ability to make plays and score.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 minutes ago, Will D. Ness said:

    I'm actually getting kind of psyched to see if he means business.  15 lbs?  Nice.

    The kid gave up being at his sister's wedding to work out here...that's some stone cold chit....Me2

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    38 minutes ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    Seems like the right move for balancing lines and being hard to play against.

    They'll play around with different options, and likely give Rossi PP2 minutes to allow for scoring there, but Gaudreau has shown an ability to score when setup in high danger situations, and Foligno has scored a bit in the past. If Rossi is a great skater and passer, he should be able to help them succeed.

    If it doesn't work, they'll pivot to other options they tinker with along the way, but who else would you put between Gaudreau and Foligno to help them reach 20 goals in the upcoming season?

    Also have to consider who they are going to pair on PP and PK opportunities when they are formulating what lines they'd like to try 5v5.

    They exceeded preseason expectations each of the last 2 seasons, so "same ol' stuff" might not be the worst thing to some fans. If they can enter a postseason healthy, results could change significantly from doing the same.

    So why wouldn't Duhaime balance that line and Moose the 4th line? I like all your other points on PP and PK. I'd put Rossi on the PK like they did Fiala a few back.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Rossi on the Gaudreau/Foligno line is not the worst thing in the world. However, how do you grade Rossi? I would suggest that results are important, but the true grades should be high danger scoring chances that Rossi provides whether or not they are converted.

    The issue here may be conversion, and if Rossi isn't producing assists, it may look like a fail. It's not if he's producing the HDSCs. Another grade could be the net goals at 5v5. If this is a strong line that doesn't get scored on and chips in a little offense, that is a good thing to help the team win. 

    Now, if we're grading Rossi with chances instead of points, does that mean that Addy deserves the same type of grading? I'd say yes he does. Last season we saw Addison deliver a team worst goalie sv% while he was on the ice. This would be a stat I'd watch, but also the net HDSCs to see what is happening. 

    Of course, for both of these players, the statistics here are mainly a focus, the eye test must also be passed. I'm hoping that Von is going to be attending preseason games and giving us a summary after each of what he saw from the young kids.

    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, vonlonster67 said:

    So why wouldn't Duhaime balance that line and Moose the 4th line? I like all your other points on PP and PK. I'd put Rossi on the PK like they did Fiala a few back.

    I would love to see Duhaime moved up. His speed would help. But, in determining the 3rd and 4th lines, I think a lot of these players are interchangeable and can be tinkered with.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, mnfaninnc said:

    Rossi on the Gaudreau/Foligno line is not the worst thing in the world. However, how do you grade Rossi? I would suggest that results are important, but the true grades should be high danger scoring chances that Rossi provides whether or not they are converted.

    The issue here may be conversion, and if Rossi isn't producing assists, it may look like a fail. It's not if he's producing the HDSCs. Another grade could be the net goals at 5v5. If this is a strong line that doesn't get scored on and chips in a little offense, that is a good thing to help the team win. 

    Now, if we're grading Rossi with chances instead of points, does that mean that Addy deserves the same type of grading? I'd say yes he does. Last season we saw Addison deliver a team worst goalie sv% while he was on the ice. This would be a stat I'd watch, but also the net HDSCs to see what is happening. 

    Of course, for both of these players, the statistics here are mainly a focus, the eye test must also be passed. I'm hoping that Von is going to be attending preseason games and giving us a summary after each of what he saw from the young kids.

    Going to camp a few days next week

    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 minutes ago, vonlonster67 said:

    The kid gave up being at his sister's wedding to work out here...that's some stone cold chit....Me2

    That's a nice gesture, but it must translate to the ice. At this point, extra credit points don't count unless we see a real difference.

    Sadly, I'll bet his sister planned the wedding to the offseason just so he could attend. I hope he doesn't regret that decision later in life.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Did I miss it?  The article mentions that Rossi will start with Freddy and Foligno.  It doesn't say if Freddy or Rossi will be center.  I hope they keep Rossi at Center.  Someone with his skill will eventually make the players around him better.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, vonlonster67 said:

    So why wouldn't Duhaime balance that line and Moose the 4th line?

    I'm not saying he couldn't, but I think they want to keep Dewar and Duhaime together, particularly to work together on the PK. Close friends and Dewar sets up some good chances as well. Duhaime isn't exactly known as a scorer, and certainly isn't known as a clever passer(12 assists in 131 games; just 1 last year).

    In looking at Duhaime's last 2 seasons compared to Foligno's last 4 seasons(trying to use as large a sample as seems applicable), Duhaime has shot the puck around 50% more frequently than Foligno.  On the other hand, Foligno has scored goals around 50% more frequently than Duhaime, on a per minute basis, and scored more than twice as frequently per shot attempt. On a per attempt basis, Duhaime was better last season than his first season with the Wild, but still fell well short of where Foligno traditionally sits.

    I believe Foligno may have been playing through some injury last year that reduced his shooting ability, but the prior 3 seasons had him scoring much more frequently, per shot, than Duhaime was able to muster last year.  If Foligno doesn't get back to how he played 2 seasons ago, I could certainly see him moved to 4th line.

    I'm not opposed to them trying other options, I just fully expected them to go into training camp with the lines that we now know they are considering using.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, MNCountryLife said:

    Did I miss it?  The article mentions that Rossi will start with Freddy and Foligno.  It doesn't say if Freddy or Rossi will be center.  I hope they keep Rossi at Center.  Someone with his skill will eventually make the players around him better.

    Evason quote from The Athletic regarding Rossi, "He’ll start, which you’ll see at the start of camp, with (Marcus) Foligno and (Freddy) Gaudreau on the right side."

    I interpreted that as Rossi centering the two of them, but if they got the punctuation wrong, I suppose it could be interpreted the other way.

    That line should be solid on faceoffs because Gaudreau is pretty good and can handle them if Rossi is struggling or gets thrown out of the circle.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    I'm not saying he couldn't, but I think they want to keep Dewar and Duhaime together, particularly to work together on the PK. Close friends and Dewar sets up some good chances as well. Duhaime isn't exactly known as a scorer, and certainly isn't known as a clever passer(12 assists in 131 games; just 1 last year).

    In looking at Duhaime's last 2 seasons compared to Foligno's last 4 seasons(trying to use as large a sample as seems applicable), Duhaime has shot the puck around 50% more frequently than Foligno.  On the other hand, Foligno has scored goals around 50% more frequently than Duhaime, on a per minute basis, and scored more than twice as frequently per shot attempt. On a per attempt basis, Duhaime was better last season than his first season with the Wild, but still fell well short of where Foligno traditionally sits.

    I believe Foligno may have been playing through some injury last year that reduced his shooting ability, but the prior 3 seasons had him scoring much more frequently, per shot, than Duhaime was able to muster last year.  If Foligno doesn't get back to how he played 2 seasons ago, I could certainly see him moved to 4th line.

    I'm not opposed to them trying other options, I just fully expected them to go into training camp with the lines that we now know they are considering using.

    So comparing them head to head may not be fair as Duhaime has had limited opportunity compared to Moose who has played with much better talent.

    I believe Dewey is on the brink of improving significantly if give the opportunity. Bottom line, Dewey vs Moose. Dewey still has age, grit, physical, speed, can score if given the opportunity and belongs on the penalty kill.  He is our future.

    DE can work out the rest. 

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Oh good.  Throw him on another checking line, which clearly isn’t his game, then send him back to Iowa when he’s not producing and blame it on his game.

    Put him with somebody that can score and let him be a playmaker.  Makes much more sense to give him a shot on the first line and get Hartman where he belongs.  You can always adjust if it doesn’t work throughout camp.

    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 minutes ago, vonlonster67 said:

    Dewey still has age, grit, physical, speed, can score if given the opportunity and belongs on the penalty kill.  He is our future.

    I appreciate Duhaime's game, but his past doesn't make me all that hopeful for offensive output. He hasn't topped 15 goals in 1 season at any level the last decade.

    And while Foligno has played on a higher line, Eriksson Ek had not been a high level passer. He had not topped 23 assists in a season prior to last year(when he played more PP than ever before). To be fair, Eriksson Ek did lead the Wild in even strength assists last year, playing with Boldy.  Greenway recorded 0 assists in 17 games for the Sabres last season, 5 for the Wild, and also had not been a major factor in the passing game.

    Dewar was actually a playmaking scorer in the WHL. Dewar had 81 points(36 goals, 45 assists) in 59 games his last year of WHL play--he led the entire team in scoring and they were the top team in their division. Reaves tallied 10 assists last year with the Wild. Duhaime recorded 1 assist.

    I really like Duhaime's energy on the 4th line, I'm just not sure he has the all around game yet to elevate him, likely not above an alternate captain from last season. I think we'll see how they both do this season. At some point, Foligno may miss games due to injury and Duhaime makes sense filling in there and they could backfill the 4th line someone else. If he thrives, maybe he sticks there.

    Nothing is set in stone, and Duhaime may show off some skills he's never flashed before if given more opportunity. We'll see how it all plays out.

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    I appreciate Duhaime's game, but his past doesn't make me all that hopeful for offensive output. He hasn't topped 15 goals in 1 season at any level the last decade.

    And while Foligno has played on a higher line, Eriksson Ek had not been a high level passer. He had not topped 23 assists in a season prior to last year(when he played more PP than ever before). To be fair, Eriksson Ek did lead the Wild in even strength assists last year, playing with Boldy.  Greenway recorded 0 assists in 17 games for the Sabres last season, 5 for the Wild, and also had not been a major factor in the passing game.

    Dewar was actually a playmaking scorer in the WHL. Dewar had 81 points(36 goals, 45 assists) in 59 games his last year of WHL play--he led the entire team in scoring and they were the top team in their division. Reaves tallied 10 assists last year with the Wild. Duhaime recorded 1 assist.

    I really like Duhaime's energy on the 4th line, I'm just not sure he has the all around game yet to elevate him, likely not above an alternate captain from last season. I think we'll see how they both do this season. At some point, Foligno may miss games due to injury and Duhaime makes sense filling in there and they could backfill the 4th line someone else. If he thrives, maybe he sticks there.

    Nothing is set in stone, and Duhaime may show off some skills he's never flashed before if given more opportunity. We'll see how it all plays out.

    We're gonna need Dewey as I'm guessing Moose still isn't healed yet which is why we saw Jujhar Khaira signed.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, Beast said:

    Put him with somebody that can score and let him be a playmaker.  Makes much more sense to give him a shot on the first line and get Hartman where he belongs.  You can always adjust if it doesn’t work throughout camp.

    So, put Hartman with 2 guys who need a playmaker to be dangerous, and put Rossi with 2 guys who don't need a playmaker to be dangerous?

    I can see how that would benefit Rossi's scoring stats, but why would that be beneficial for the Wild?

    Who do you park in front of the net to screen when Kaprizov, Rossi, and Zuccarello are on the ice together?

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, vonlonster67 said:

    We're gonna need Dewey as I'm guessing Moose still isn't healed yet which is why we saw Jujhar Khaira signed.

    Possible.  Evason hinted that someone wasn't 100%, but he thought he'd be good to go by the start of the season.  He did not disclose which forward it was though.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 hours ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    So, put Hartman with 2 guys who need a playmaker to be dangerous, and put Rossi with 2 guys who don't need a playmaker to be dangerous?

    I'm firmly in the camp that wants Rossi to be given a better opportunity than a checking line to see if he can make the jump, but this comment gets to the heart of the quandry: Rossi, even if he can be a proper 1C, is not bringing the missing ingredients to a line with KK and Zucc. Hartman has worked reasonably well with KK and Zucc because he is a good triggerman and has some sandpaper in his game. Rossi doesn't look like he'll be a goals-first scoring center, which is fine. High-level playmaking is a wonderful quality, especially in a top 6 center. It's just not what's needed for the center playing with KK and Zucc.

    Now if EEK developed good chemistry with KK and Zucc, that would be wonderful for that line AND it would open up a good role for Rossi on the line with Boldy and MoJo. MoJo can help secure offensive zone control, Boldy is a scorer, and Rossi can be the playmaker. That would be an ideal scenario. Unfortunately, EEK hasn't demonstrated that chemistry with KK and Zucc. Not to mention it seems foolish to disrupt the MoJo - EEK - Boldy line that looks to be very effective.

    And to huckleberry's last point, it's possible Rossi help Foligno and Gaudreau become better offensive contributors. 

    Edited by Velgey
    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I am not a fan of Evason as a coach. I think he stifles prospects and has no idea on how to develop them properly.

    Why the fuck would you not start a top 10 picked prospect on the first line and set him up to succeed? He is already defensively responsible. This is an idiotic plan.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, TCMooch said:

    Why the fuck would you not start a top 10 picked prospect on the first line and set him up to succeed? He is already defensively responsible.

    Line balancing, line balancing, line balancing!

    Maximize the ice for 60-65 minutes, not just 15-16 minutes of even strength play.

    If Rossi cannot be a complete player centering 2 defensively responsible veterans, why should he be elevated to play with Kaprizov and Zuccarello, who face high level competition regularly and were scored against frequently last season, particularly when Hartman was out.

    Until Rossi proves that he's a better defensive forward who also holds his position in front of the net more solidly than Hartman, he's not going to play there even strength this season.

    Rossi will almost certainly be on one of the PP units. They aren't going to hold him back from performing. It's up to him to earn more through his play, not his draft position.

    Losing teams prioritize minutes based upon draft positions, the Wild prioritize for performance.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...