Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • Playing Zeev Buium Would Help the Wild's Short- and Long-Term Goals


    Image courtesy of Jeff Curry - Imagn Images
    Tony Abbott

    Tonight's not the night. The Minnesota Wild announced that Zeev Buium won't play Tuesday as the team tries to sew up their playoff spot in Game 82. If the team isn't willing to put their top prospect into the lineup for a must-win game against the 35-37-8 Anaheim Ducks, it's far from guaranteed that he'd get in the lineup for the playoffs.

    But one thing is certain: He should.

    Granted, it's weird for an NHL club to turn to a literal teenager and say, Punch our ticket in, much less, Go help us win a playoff seriesCale Makar and Brock Faber may have transitioned from college to an NHL playoff environment, but those guys were both 20 when they made that jump. Nobody doubts Buium's talents, but relying on him with everything on the line is a tall order, even in a sheltered role.

    And yet, he should still play.

    While Minnesota's in a precarious playoff position, it has to be understood that this roster hasn't been good enough to clinch in their first 81 games. Are there reasons why? Injuries to key players, cap constraints? Of course. But here's where they're at, and as the saying goes: You are what your record says you are.

    Unless something changes. We saw a spark of energy when Kirill Kaprizov and Joel Eriksson Ek combined for six goals upon their return. However, that jolt couldn't sustain them through a must-win slugfest with the Calgary Flames on Saturday. The Flames also had everything on the line, to be fair, but so will any first-round opponent the Wild draw. Minnesota needs more.

    Buium can give them more. He might not, but that's not important. What matters is that he raises the ceiling for the Wild. To say nothing of his 5-on-5 play, Buium helmed a Denver power play that led the NCAA with 46 goals (in 41 games) and ran at a 29.1% clip. College and the NHL are apples and oranges, but the Wild enter Game 82 with just 43 power-play goals on the season. 

    Buium helps close a major power play gap between them and their first-round opponents. The Winnipeg Jets have clinched the Central Division, and the Vegas Golden Knights can clinch the Pacific tonight. Those teams are ranked No. 1 and 2 in power play percentage, respectively, converting over 29% of their opportunities. That's terrifying, even before accounting for the Wild's 30th-ranked penalty kill.

    Underdog, low-scoring teams like the Wild often have to slow the game down to a crawl to win a playoff series. Minnesota will undoubtedly do that at 5-on-5, but that just increases the importance of special teams. The Wild will have to try to match one of the league's best two power plays goal-for-goal, even if they come out ahead at even strength.

    Hockey coaches love to deal with known quantities. Coaches don't catch heat for putting solid but low-upside options like Jon Merrill and Zach Bogosian in the lineup. However, they do when they put a rookie into the playoffs, and the player struggles. But after 80 games, the Wild are a known quantity, and the Jets/Knights are, too. On paper, those teams are simply better. Without a trade deadline move to bolster their roster, Buium is the only option the Wild have to make themselves an unknown quantity.

    That doesn't only have the potential to help the team for a playoff series or two. Playing Buium can potentially help the Wild solidify their organizational plan, which revolves entirely around retaining their superstar.

    This July is the Moment of Truth for the Wild and Kaprizov. Will Kaprizov sign a mega-deal with the team that drafted him, or will he show reluctance to sign? If it's the latter, the Wild will almost certainly be forced to trade him.

    We don't know Kaprizov's first priority. If it's money, that's entirely within the Wild's control. If it's being in a certain market, that's entirely outside Minnesota's control. And if it's winning? It's complicated.

    The Wild have had Kaprizov for five years, four of which have been hindered by the onerous Zach Parise/Ryan Suter buyouts. During that time, Minnesota competed. They've made the playoffs and built a solid young core. But they haven't won, and they probably aren't going to win this year -- whether Buium raises their ceiling or not.

    But there's losing, and there's losing in a way that helps sell hope. Having Buium in the playoff lineup gives Minnesota the best chance to sell Kaprizov hope, even if they lose.

    Picture this scenario: Buium steps in as the power play quarterback, and he's ready to take control of it immediately. What's more? He's good at it. He can manipulate defenders in ways that Brock Faber and Jared Spurgeon couldn't. Buium shows a knack for finding Kaprizov, who feasts with the space his new defenseman creates for him. Still, Minnesota loses their playoff series in five games. 

    Now picture this: the Wild have a repeat of their 2021 series against Vegas. The series goes seven games, with Minnesota unfortunately going home after many hard-fought, low-scoring contests. The power play struggles, scoring just two goals.

    Which locker room clean-out day conversation will be more appealing for Kaprizov?

    Scenario 1: Hey, I know this was a tough series, and we fell short, but we're out from the worst of cap hell, and we just saw that you've got the John Carlson to your Alex Ovechkin in place for as long as you sign here.

    or

    Scenario 2: Hey, I know this was a tough series, and we fell short, but we're out of the worst of cap hell. We've got all these prospects that you've basically only seen in practice, go ahead and sign on that dotted line July 1. 

    Look, there's a chance that Buium might not make a difference in either increasing their playoff ceiling or re-signing their superstar. But no one knows that until he plays. All we can operate off of, in the moment, is what positions Minnesota the best to accomplish its short and long-term goals.

    The Wild know what the team they'll ice tonight is capable of: This (essentially) is the exact same team that hit a wall in the playoffs in 2021, 2022, and 2023. If the Wild want to raise their ceiling for the postseason and be in a position to entice Kaprizov with the fruits of their youth movement, playing Buium should be a no-brainer.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 5

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    I agree. Playoff spot is on the line and it’s not worth playing him. Can you imagine the fans and media if he screws up and costs the game?

     

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

      On 4/15/2025 at 7:42 PM, TCMooch said:

    I agree. Playoff spot is on the line and it’s not worth playing him. Can you imagine the fans and media if he screws up and costs the game?

     

    Expand  

    Same goes for Merill too haha but I do understand why they're not playing him.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I understand it as well.  But it is a letdown.  Many of us wanted to see him play.  It's sad because if the Wild had shown up and played in Calgary plus a few other games they could have played him tonight in a non playoff type game.  You never know what you are getting with this Wild team.  Kaprisov  and Ek had great first games back playing the worst team in the NHL.  They and the team haven't really played well since.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It's the same thing.  Has they won the game in Calgary to secure a playoff Fleury could have played tonight in likely his last NHL game for the home crowd.  Maybe the game will be one sided and he can get in to play lol

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Montreal is in a similar position as the Wild but it didn't stop them from playing Demidov right away. He rewarded them with a goal and an assist his first game in the N for their confidence. Wild are not dice rollers.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

      On 4/15/2025 at 8:42 PM, MacGyver said:

    Montreal is in a similar position as the Wild but it didn't stop them from playing Demidov right away. He rewarded them with a goal and an assist his first game in the N for their confidence. Wild are not dice rollers.

    Expand  

    I wonder if Demidov got a practice in with the team. My understanding is that so far, Buium has not.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    No, it does not make sense to hold him out (in regard to their chances of winning tonight and in the playoffs).  And, yes, it is worth the “risk.”  I use that word because it seems some think there’s the possibility of him sabotaging tonight’s game with bad hockey.

    This team isn’t going to miss the playoffs because Buium wouldn’t hold up defensively in some way.  He wouldn’t get big even strength minutes.  He certainly wouldn’t get PK minutes (maybe ever in his career).

    They may miss the playoffs because they have no offense.  That’s the case without Buium.  Could it really get worse with him?  I don’t see how.

    Is it really “risky” to roll with 7 defenseman and exclude a 4th line guy that offers nothing?

    For reference, Brazeau is career 48% CF% at under 12 minutes a game.  Trenin about the same.  Hartman is 49% this year.  Johnny Merrill is 44.3% this year and a -7.  Bogosian 45% at -6.

    Whats more risky?  Going into Anaheim knowing your offense is in rough shape, having a rough night and potentially losing 2-1?  Or, Buium’s offensive skills not translating to the NHL and providing nothing to scoresheet immediately?  If they don’t get some production from somebody else (Boldy, Kaprisov, Ek, etc.), they’re losing with it without Buium.

    What’s more risky?  Going into the playoffs with Buium having a taste of the speed of the NHL?  Or, getting desperate in game 3 or 4 and throwing him out there in a no-win situation in a series that’s probably already over?  Or, not playing him at all and continuing with something that clearly isn’t working?

    Makes no sense to me from a hockey standpoint.  If they’re not playing them tonight, it tells me they’re not playing him at all.  With Buium, you at least provide some hope.  He has the upside to meaningfully impact the series in a way no other wild defenseman (maybe in their history) can.  That alone may get some extra jump and excitement from the rest of the team.  With the status quo, this team stinks and everyone knows are going 1 series and done, short of a miracle goaltending.

    It’s not about the “risk” of Buium being in over his head and create a loss when they need a win.  It’s 100% about preserving a year on his ELC.  Which, fine, that may be correct call.  But have the spine to say that in the media.  Don’t trowel out putrid sludge about Buium being a performance risk more so than some of the black holes were running out.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

      On 4/15/2025 at 9:24 PM, TCMooch said:

    I’m hoping the Wild don’t even make the playoffs in the hopes Dipshit Billy gets fired

    Expand  

    Billy's not getting canned this year even if they miss the playoffs, sorry to burst your bubble. IF the Wild miss again next season or don't win a round in the playoffs then his seat gets real toasty.

    I'm not a blind Guerin defender by any means but I don't think his seat is even warm yet. This offseason and next year will be how Billy's tenure is ultimately judged.

    • Like 5
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

      On 4/15/2025 at 9:38 PM, M_Nels said:

    Billy's not getting canned this year even if they miss the playoffs, sorry to burst your bubble. IF the Wild miss again next season or don't win a round in the playoffs then his seat gets real toasty.

    I'm not a blind Guerin defender by any means but I don't think his seat is even warm yet. This offseason and next year will be how Billy's tenure is ultimately judged.

    Expand  

    Owner already said he was all in with Billy G’s five year plan. Currently in year two. Billy G isn’t going anywhere anytime soon. Maybe if he can’t re-sign Kaprizov this summer, he’ll feel the heat you speak of. 

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

      On 4/15/2025 at 8:52 PM, Enforceror said:

    I wonder if Demidov got a practice in with the team. My understanding is that so far, Buium has not.

    Expand  

    Demidov got one team practice the day before he played. Buium got in an optional practice where only ten players participated. A slight but insignificant difference. I can see both sides of this but it is so like the Wild to choose to be conservative. The Wild are signaling they are approaching with caution. This could be a game the Wild are going to be playing not to lose rather than playing to win.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

      On 4/15/2025 at 9:06 PM, Beast said:

    No, it does not make sense to hold him out (in regard to their chances of winning tonight and in the playoffs).  And, yes, it is worth the “risk.”  I use that word because it seems some think there’s the possibility of him sabotaging tonight’s game with bad hockey.

    This team isn’t going to miss the playoffs because Buium wouldn’t hold up defensively in some way.  He wouldn’t get big even strength minutes.  He certainly wouldn’t get PK minutes (maybe ever in his career).

    They may miss the playoffs because they have no offense.  That’s the case without Buium.  Could it really get worse with him?  I don’t see how.

    Is it really “risky” to roll with 7 defenseman and exclude a 4th line guy that offers nothing?

    For reference, Brazeau is career 48% CF% at under 12 minutes a game.  Trenin about the same.  Hartman is 49% this year.  Johnny Merrill is 44.3% this year and a -7.  Bogosian 45% at -6.

    Whats more risky?  Going into Anaheim knowing your offense is in rough shape, having a rough night and potentially losing 2-1?  Or, Buium’s offensive skills not translating to the NHL and providing nothing to scoresheet immediately?  If they don’t get some production from somebody else (Boldy, Kaprisov, Ek, etc.), they’re losing with it without Buium.

    What’s more risky?  Going into the playoffs with Buium having a taste of the speed of the NHL?  Or, getting desperate in game 3 or 4 and throwing him out there in a no-win situation in a series that’s probably already over?  Or, not playing him at all and continuing with something that clearly isn’t working?

    Makes no sense to me from a hockey standpoint.  If they’re not playing them tonight, it tells me they’re not playing him at all.  With Buium, you at least provide some hope.  He has the upside to meaningfully impact the series in a way no other wild defenseman (maybe in their history) can.  That alone may get some extra jump and excitement from the rest of the team.  With the status quo, this team stinks and everyone knows are going 1 series and done, short of a miracle goaltending.

    It’s not about the “risk” of Buium being in over his head and create a loss when they need a win.  It’s 100% about preserving a year on his ELC.  Which, fine, that may be correct call.  But have the spine to say that in the media.  Don’t trowel out putrid sludge about Buium being a performance risk more so than some of the black holes were running out.

    Expand  

    I could be wrong, but I thought I  we already burned a year of his ELC, regardless if he plays or not.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

      On 4/15/2025 at 7:42 PM, TCMooch said:

    I agree. Playoff spot is on the line and it’s not worth playing him. Can you imagine the fans and media if he screws up and costs the game?

     

    Expand  

    If a 19-year-old playing one game can cost you a playoff spot, that spot was never really yours to begin with.

    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

      On 4/16/2025 at 12:36 AM, Tony Abbott said:

    If a 19-year-old playing one game can cost you a playoff spot, that spot was never really yours to begin with.

    Expand  

    I guess I agree? Team is dog shit and just barely scraped it’s pathetic ass into the playoffs for another first round exit

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Merrill has managed a team low minus 8 while playing the most protected minutes Hynes could dream up.  Zeev gives you a significantly better chance to win. 

    Ironically,  Merrill's brain dead line change (brain dead decisions are a staple of his game) almost cost the Wild their playoff spot.  

    Hynes is a coward.  Maybe that's why this team always folds in the big game? 

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

      On 4/16/2025 at 1:52 PM, Patrick said:

    Hynes is a coward.  Maybe that's why this team always folds in the big game? 

    Expand  

    I think coward might be too harsh, I would call him too conservative/cautious, especially the last 1/2 of the season. I think a lot of that came with the injuries and the Wild had to play a more defensive game.

    Early in the season the boys were fast through the neutral zone and played a good transition game. The last games (except SJS game) of a mostly full roster looked stagnant. They need to get back to the higher octane game to have a sliver of a chance against Vegas.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...