Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • Minnesota's Injuries Highlight Iowa's Trouble Developing Prospects


    Image courtesy of Nick Wosika-Imagn Images
    Robert Brent

    The Minnesota Wild have had almost everything go right in the 2024-25 season. Kirill Kaprizov is playing at another level, and young core players like Marco Rossi, Brock Faber, and Matt Boldy continue to develop. Filip Gustavsson has shaken off last year's inconsistency and become one of the league's elite goaltenders. 

    A rash of injuries was the only thing that could stop their run. In the last couple of weeks, the Wild have had Jake Middleton, Jonas Brodin, Mats Zuccarello, and Joel Eriksson Ek headline the players who have missed games.

    The Wild have continued to win games despite health problems, but it is concerning that the team has missed so many regulars. On December 12th, the short-handed Wild never had a chance against the Edmonton Oilers, losing 7-1. 

    If Minnesota wants to avoid more games like that, it must find adequate replacements for its lineup regulars. Unfortunately, Iowa is unlikely to provide those replacements. 

    Iowa Struggles To Produce Replacements

    When Middleton sustained his injury, it seemed like the Wild would need to bring up a player from the AHL to fill his spot. The team just traded for David Jiricek and has spent considerable resources building their defensive assets over the last several years. 

    That expectation changed when Michael Russo reported that Minnesota didn’t feel that prospects Carson Lambos and Ryan O’Rourke were ready for NHL action. Instead, Minnesota claimed veteran defender Travis Dermott off waivers to fill their blue line needs. 

    With all due respect to Travis Dermott, who has put together a solid career, he hasn’t logged an on-ice expected goal above 50% or a Corsi-for rating above 50% since 2021. In all likelihood, he’s a replacement-level player that the Wild felt was a better option than anyone in the system.

    Iowa’s struggles have been on the radar for some time, but the Wild’s injuries only intensify the spotlight. Rossi is the only skater on the Wild’s roster to play more than 50 games in Iowa. Everyone else developed in other leagues like the NCAA, KHL, Swedish Elite League, or elsewhere. 

    It’s not like Iowa doesn’t have talent. Minnesota has a reputation for drafting high-level talent. In The Athletic’s fan survey, NHL fans ranked the Wild as the sixth-best team at drafting and developing, while Wild fans ranked them 12th.

     

    Screenshot 2024-12-16 at 10.16.00 AM.png

    In this case, the drafting part of this equation is doing the heavy lifting. The Wild have stockpiled great young players, but only some go through Iowa. As mentioned, Rossi spent time in the AHL, but there are far more examples of prospects going through Iowa and not being prepared for the NHL. The team has already gotten very little out of prospects like Adam Beckman and Calen Addison, who looked like potential impact players.

    Few of the NHL’s top players spend significant time in the AHL. It may be unreasonable to expect Iowa to produce regular NHLers out of late-round picks. However, the Wild don’t have anyone ready to play even a few games in case of an injury, which is concerning. 

    Reinforcements Needed

    Iowa’s lack of NHL-ready prospects has become an issue. While players get injured every season, this is far from Minnesota’s first time facing a high volume of players missing time. Injuries to key players like Jared Spurgeon sank the Wild last year. Minnesota’s injury issues have been a recurring storyline dating back to 2011. The need for high-quality reinforcements should not surprise the team. 

    Still, the Wild aren’t confident they can depend on prospects like O’Rourke and Lambos. Instead, they’ve used a patchwork group of lower-lineup players to help fill the gaps. Recently, players like Ben Jones, Travis Boyd, Travis Dermott, and Devin Shore have played minutes for the Wild. All of those players have also played with Iowa this season.

    However, I’m concerned about players the Wild drafted and developed in the system. For example, Travis Boyd may play in Iowa, but he has already played over 250 NHL games. Those talents aren’t players Minnesota drafted and developed. They’re the proverbial band-aids on a rash of injuries that threaten to become a gunshot wound.

    All the players mentioned have done a fine job in their limited action. However, the Wild would be much better off if they could get ice time for their prospects. Minnesota has spent a lot of resources building a strong infrastructure for drafting prospects under Judd Brackett's guidance and has been relatively successful. Why use those resources if they can’t be confident prospects can rise through the ranks in Iowa?

    Lack Of Development Could Hurt Wild In the Future 

    The Wild’s issues with developing prospects are hurting them, but they will be even more concerning going forward. Waiver-wire pickups and short-term deals with veterans can be fruitful, but Minnesota will always have to replace them. If a player like Travis Dermott is successful, the Wild will have to pay them or let them leave. Should they have more injury issues, the Wild will return in the same situation.

    Instead, having young players with contract control and experience in the organization would be much more valuable. Restricted free agency gives teams more control and allows them to keep players or acquire assets for their departures. 

    The Wild have created a core group of players, but they’ll always need valuable depth players. A narrative surrounding the team’s roster construction has been that veteran contracts keep the team’s prospects from getting time in the NHL. That’s true in some cases. However, even when spots open up due to injuries, Iowa has no one ready to step up.

    To reiterate, the Iowa Wild don't need to churn out players who play hundreds of games in the NHL. That’d be an unrealistic expectation, and most of the Wild’s top players complete their development in other pro leagues or make an immediate impact in the NHL. What is the job of a development team if not to prepare prospects to be somewhat ready to play in the league? 

    The Wild’s recent rash of injuries proves that Iowa is severely behind on development because the team doesn’t feel that anyone in the AHL is ready even to play a few games to fill in for injury. If Minnesota can’t figure out a better system for developing their prospects, then it doesn’t matter how well they draft. If players like Carson Lambos and Ryan O’Rourke aren’t ready to fill in for injuries, then the Wild risk a mad scramble every time players miss games.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Garbage in Garbage out:

    You didn't hear it from me but the scouting dept. is the problem, contrary to all the hype beat reporters like to spread.  Who has come out of our farm system since Judd arrived.  Yes I realize I'm calling my shot early on Judd but I never thought I'd miss Conner Dewar and Duhaime.

    Edited by Pewterschmidt
    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Draft guru or otherwise, the draft is a low likelihood lottery. Like 19% of prospects end up playing more than three seasons in the NHL. 63% of first round picks, and only 25% of second round pick end up playing. With this in mind, let's do a deep dive of Brackett's way too early numbers in Minn. 

    2020

    Round Pick Player Games Played

    1 9 Rossi 134 NHL

    2 37 K Nut 44 NHL

    2 39 O'Rourke 0- AHL +2

    3 65 Hunt 13 AHL +1

    5 146 Novak 0 KHL?

    2021

    1 20 Wallstedt 5 AHL+1

    1 26 Lambos 0 AHL +1

    2 54 Peart 0 AHL +1

    3 86 Bankier 0 AHL 

    4 118 Masters 0 AHL

    4 127 Pillar 0 Usports (NCAA CAN Equiv)

    6 182 Benoit 0 NCAA

    2022

    1 19 Ohgren 2 AHL

    1 24 Yurov 0 KHL 

    2 47 Haight 0 AHL

    2 57 Lorenz 0 NCAA

    3 89 Milne 1 AHL+1

    4 121 Healey 0 NCAA

    5 153 Spacek 0 AHL

    6 185 Petrovsky Czechia

    Obviously this is an extremely early look as most of his first draft is 22/23 years old at most. The average age to break into the NHL is 20.6 years, however the average age in the NHL is 26. I would say what we have is what we will get out of the 2020 draft, which is absolutely solid. A first, second, and third rounder all playing over 10 games at an NHL level is more than you can ask of most draft classes.  2021 draft is getting to the point where we have a good idea of what will come out of this. I think Bankier and Lambos both have a possibility of making it but it is getting lower and lower. Wallstedt will be an NHL goaltender, only a matter of time. 2022 draft- Ohgren and Yurov will likely both get NHL action, but still a question of will they stick. Spacek, Milne, Haight and Lorenz all have a possibility of making it, however thin. 

    I'm not even getting into 23 and 24 drafts because it is WAY too early to pass judgement on either one. Still, from what we have seen so far, Brackett is exceeding the average, if not by a huge margin.

    • Like 4
    • Thanks 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    We need to spend more time talking about 97’s ability to ‘flop’ pucks over defenders stick onto the tape of teammates.  Puck doesn’t bounce when it lands. It lands more like a corn hole bag would land.  Not quite a sauce pass.  And clearly easy to handle as teammates rarely bobble these passes.  Just another thing 97 can do that’s special

    Edited by Pewterschmidt
    • Like 7
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    53 minutes ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    Garbage in Garbage out:

    You didn't hear it from me but the scouting dept. is the problem, contrary to all the hype beat reporters like to spread.  Who has come out of our farm system since Judd arrived.  Yes I realize I'm calling my shot early on Judd but I never thought I'd miss Conner Dewar and Duhaime.

    100% That plus knowing when to sell on these gems to get some form of value, don’t over hold the prospects if you can see their trajectory taking a slide. But instead we just let them play in and hope. Creative/out-of-box thinking is missing. 

    • Confused 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    My best guess, let’s call it a hunch, is that the prospects in question aren’t very good. Maybe they develop? I don’t think it’s the system in Iowa or bad coaching. Overall the Wild are adding young players at a very nice pace. I don’t care where they come from. NCAA, KHL, waivers, or low hype trades. I think the AHL overall is really good at developing bottom 6 forwards and defenseman. Am I suggesting lowering expectations for players coming out of Iowa? Yes given the occasional exception. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 hours ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    Garbage in Garbage out:

    You didn't hear it from me but the scouting dept. is the problem, contrary to all the hype beat reporters like to spread.  Who has come out of our farm system since Judd arrived.  Yes I realize I'm calling my shot early on Judd but I never thought I'd miss Conner Dewar and Duhaime.

    No credit for Faby Baby? I assume our scouts had a hand in evaluating his talents.

    IMHO it’s the coaching in Iowa that’s the bigger problem.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, TheGoosesAreLooses said:

    Draft guru or otherwise, the draft is a low likelihood lottery. Like 19% of prospects end up playing more than three seasons in the NHL. 63% of first round picks, and only 25% of second round pick end up playing.

    Thank you! Where did you get this?

    I assumed prospects didn’t hit very often. And I’m right!! 😁

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 12/16/2024 at 8:43 PM, FredJohnson said:

    No credit for Faby Baby? I assume our scouts had a hand in evaluating his talents.

     

    No one had a clue Faber was going to be the minute eating stud out of the gate like he has been. This is where Billy is more lucky than good sometimes. Fiala was going to LA regardless and that is who Billy had to deal with. If LA had a clue Faber was going to be Faber they never would have done the deal, at least not with Faber included. It's not like Billy targeted LA with Faber as his focus.  In fact the Wild passed three times on Faber in the draft taking Rossi at 9th overall  Marat at 31st and Ryan O'Rourke at 39th. 

    The Kings traded up with the Wings to get Faber at 45th. In fairness to Billy the entire NHL was caught off guard with Faber. The list of D taken before him is pretty much a list of "who's that"? with the exception of Sanderson and Drysdale. Neither of which is no Brock Faber. 

    Billy could hardly wait to wash his hands of Fiala and would have taken almost whatever LA would offer. Same with Talbot. He wanted him moved and NOW! So he gets Gus as almost an after thought and then he tried all this last off season to unload him. I hope he plays the lottery because he is damn lucky. 

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    TGAL is right, only about 2/3 1st rounders hit. For a significant piece it's probably more like 50% in most drafts and in some generational drafts it gets closer to 90%.

    However, we can throw that out the window from 2020-2023, maybe '24. Covid shutdowns hurt all of these prospects in key development years. Some will react better than others. In my mind, the teams with the best scouting staffs were the big winners, plumb luck was 2nd, and teams without good scouting will probably whiff. My hope is that the Wild organization had really good scouting. 

    Now, let's evaluate a little, and I do throw Faber into the 2020 class and David Jiricek into the 2022 draft. I know it can be frustrating to need extra development, but for the kids in these drafts, with the shutdowns, it erased a year of their general development. I am also assuming that Judd liked both of these players and had them targeted. It will be interesting to see how Clarke and Faber's careers turn out.

    2020 had some pretty good players just making the rounds. We had hits on Rossi, Khus, Hunt, Faber. I was high on the O'Rourke pick, but O'Rourke really got buzzsawed in the shutdowns. I believe he should have stayed in the A instead of going back to jr. and I think there was an exemption available for that to happen. He had made a lot of progress the 2nd half of his 1st A season. For him to be effective in his game, he needed to build himself to about 210. He is listed at 190+. This will not work and is a development whiff IMO.

    Hunt was almost ready, he was over 200 lbs. and needed NHL minutes, he was a hit. I believe Rossi and Khus are hits too. The rest were just fliers. 

    In 2021, Judd was exceptionally excited about his top 3 picks, which were in his top 20 on his board. Goalies take longer to develop, but The Wall is blocked right now (not by Fleury, but by IR players), and maybe Dermott. Lambos is improving. He made and failed for team Canada. He looked solid to me as a top pairing A defender. He looked like he took bulking up seriously and while he's not listed at 200 lbs. I suspect he's a touch over. 

    Bankier looked like he improved, they have him playing center and he was on a top 6 role while I saw him, with the top 3 forwards playing in St. Paul. I thought he was noticeable and had a nice goal. He needs more strength, hopefully he is bulking up. Peart looks to me to be a solid whiff. He's too small and this is Judd's fault. Judd needs to revamp his defenders. He'd have probably loved Ryan Murphy. Masters had some hype but is stuck between the A and E. I doubt he will be anything more than a solid A player.

    Ohgren, Yurov, Haight, Spacek and Jiricek, to me, all look like they will be hits. Spacek looks like a hard worker. I can't tell a difference in his weight, but he is strong. Haight looked good for a rookie, but still has a lot to learn especially in the dot. I also thought he needed strength. I know we haven't seen Yurov yet, but I think he's coming over to make a much bigger splash than Khus. 

    I'll say it again, if you can get 3-4 hits on draft picks who play a significant role in 2/3 drafts, you can build a dynasty from it. If you look at 2020, include Faber since he was traded for before being an NHL player, that gives us 3 for that draft. 2022 may have 5. 2021 looks like it will have 2 or 3. That is significant.

    We have taken care of the goalie position. Have young reinforcements on defense, and have some nice top 6 caliber forwards, as well as bottom 6. This is a nice core. The 2015 draft will be the leaders as we see some of the placeholders get traded off. 

    Now, the main complaint I have from Iowa is coaching, specifically the defenders. They are playing well structured right now, but they need a guy they respect to "coach" them. Kurvers was a guy they could respect and his absence has not been replaced. They do not bulk up. I do not agree with the theory that it is the player's responsibility to do this, if they don't want to it washes them out. They should know the answer to this question before drafting players, and they should be insisting on bulking instead of conditioning. Many of our drafted prospects do NOT have NHL bodies. If Beckman puts on 15 lbs. of muscle, he's on this team. For whatever reason, consistently, these kids are not putting on the muscle. This is also the main reason why they are not ready. They're simply not big enough.

    Anyone who is not in an NHL body by 22, should be traded for an asset that can help this team. It's that simple. You tell the player up front, to get to the NHL, I need you to weigh X with a body fat index of Y. That's a minimum requirement. Most of these kids have dreams to get there. They are motivated. That's one carrot they need to have in front of them. I believe if O'Rourke had simply gotten to 210, he'd be a 3rd pairing guy by now, mean, nasty, and a great penalty killer. He didn't, and his game simply cannot translate to the N. I don't think you can say that is entirely on the player. That's on the development team, a team of guys that were all grinders! Something does not add up here.

    I do think the prospects were good. However, assess their habits, and if they don't measure up, ODC has the best advice, use them to trade for someone who does. He prefers players in the N, I prefer inexperienced players a little younger. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 minutes ago, MacGyver said:

    Billy could hardly wait to wash his hands of Fiala and would have taken almost whatever LA would offer. Same with Talbot. He wanted him moved and NOW! So he gets Gus as almost an after thought and then he tried all this last off season to unload him. I hope he plays the lottery because he is damn lucky. 

    I disagree. I think Shooter knew where Fiala wanted to go before his last season. I think LA set parameters as to who was their untouchables and much was predicated on how Fiala performed in his final season. I think they targeted Faber because they had scouted him, but nobody thought he had this offensive upside. Yes, I believe they thought they were getting a right handed Brodin, who would be valuable in that role.

    With Talbot, I do think that Shooter knew a bit about what he was getting. They had drafted Goose in Pittsburgh and I think he played a little for them before Pittsburgh traded him off. Yes, he wanted it done NOW, but he also had a clue on what he was getting, even though he has mentioned he is not a goalie guy. 

    I also think Shooter likes to play the role of "lucky" rather than being a good judge of talent. I think in Fiala's case, he had a full year to scout the Kings prospects, and he knew who to target. He got up the prospect line because he wasn't requiring an NHL player in return. I think it may have been more of a case that the Kings didn't know exactly what they had. I also bet that on the golf course, Shooter is a heavy handicap sandbagger. That's just who he is.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, mnfaninnc said:

    Now, the main complaint I have from Iowa is coaching, specifically the defenders. They are playing well structured right now, but they need a guy they respect to "coach" them.

    Completely agree! Something isn't quite right on the coach staff down there. I also think that bringing in 4 young defenders in a season with the other two being a year removed from drafting was an awful plan. There was zero veteran presence once Mermis had to play up in the N. When you have no one to lead and mentor on the ice, you're going to have a bad time. They brought in a couple more veteran players in Crotty and Cecconi this year which i think will have a positive effect, but the damage was already done to confidence levels and a year of development.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, mnfaninnc said:

    TGAL is right, only about 2/3 1st rounders hit. For a significant piece it's probably more like 50% in most drafts and in some generational drafts it gets closer to 90%.

    However, we can throw that out the window from 2020-2023, maybe '24. Covid shutdowns hurt all of these prospects in key development years. Some will react better than others. In my mind, the teams with the best scouting staffs were the big winners, plumb luck was 2nd, and teams without good scouting will probably whiff. My hope is that the Wild organization had really good scouting. 

    Now, let's evaluate a little, and I do throw Faber into the 2020 class and David Jiricek into the 2022 draft. I know it can be frustrating to need extra development, but for the kids in these drafts, with the shutdowns, it erased a year of their general development. I am also assuming that Judd liked both of these players and had them targeted. It will be interesting to see how Clarke and Faber's careers turn out.

    2020 had some pretty good players just making the rounds. We had hits on Rossi, Khus, Hunt, Faber. I was high on the O'Rourke pick, but O'Rourke really got buzzsawed in the shutdowns. I believe he should have stayed in the A instead of going back to jr. and I think there was an exemption available for that to happen. He had made a lot of progress the 2nd half of his 1st A season. For him to be effective in his game, he needed to build himself to about 210. He is listed at 190+. This will not work and is a development whiff IMO.

    Hunt was almost ready, he was over 200 lbs. and needed NHL minutes, he was a hit. I believe Rossi and Khus are hits too. The rest were just fliers. 

    In 2021, Judd was exceptionally excited about his top 3 picks, which were in his top 20 on his board. Goalies take longer to develop, but The Wall is blocked right now (not by Fleury, but by IR players), and maybe Dermott. Lambos is improving. He made and failed for team Canada. He looked solid to me as a top pairing A defender. He looked like he took bulking up seriously and while he's not listed at 200 lbs. I suspect he's a touch over. 

    Bankier looked like he improved, they have him playing center and he was on a top 6 role while I saw him, with the top 3 forwards playing in St. Paul. I thought he was noticeable and had a nice goal. He needs more strength, hopefully he is bulking up. Peart looks to me to be a solid whiff. He's too small and this is Judd's fault. Judd needs to revamp his defenders. He'd have probably loved Ryan Murphy. Masters had some hype but is stuck between the A and E. I doubt he will be anything more than a solid A player.

    Ohgren, Yurov, Haight, Spacek and Jiricek, to me, all look like they will be hits. Spacek looks like a hard worker. I can't tell a difference in his weight, but he is strong. Haight looked good for a rookie, but still has a lot to learn especially in the dot. I also thought he needed strength. I know we haven't seen Yurov yet, but I think he's coming over to make a much bigger splash than Khus. 

    I'll say it again, if you can get 3-4 hits on draft picks who play a significant role in 2/3 drafts, you can build a dynasty from it. If you look at 2020, include Faber since he was traded for before being an NHL player, that gives us 3 for that draft. 2022 may have 5. 2021 looks like it will have 2 or 3. That is significant.

    We have taken care of the goalie position. Have young reinforcements on defense, and have some nice top 6 caliber forwards, as well as bottom 6. This is a nice core. The 2015 draft will be the leaders as we see some of the placeholders get traded off. 

    Now, the main complaint I have from Iowa is coaching, specifically the defenders. They are playing well structured right now, but they need a guy they respect to "coach" them. Kurvers was a guy they could respect and his absence has not been replaced. They do not bulk up. I do not agree with the theory that it is the player's responsibility to do this, if they don't want to it washes them out. They should know the answer to this question before drafting players, and they should be insisting on bulking instead of conditioning. Many of our drafted prospects do NOT have NHL bodies. If Beckman puts on 15 lbs. of muscle, he's on this team. For whatever reason, consistently, these kids are not putting on the muscle. This is also the main reason why they are not ready. They're simply not big enough.

    Anyone who is not in an NHL body by 22, should be traded for an asset that can help this team. It's that simple. You tell the player up front, to get to the NHL, I need you to weigh X with a body fat index of Y. That's a minimum requirement. Most of these kids have dreams to get there. They are motivated. That's one carrot they need to have in front of them. I believe if O'Rourke had simply gotten to 210, he'd be a 3rd pairing guy by now, mean, nasty, and a great penalty killer. He didn't, and his game simply cannot translate to the N. I don't think you can say that is entirely on the player. That's on the development team, a team of guys that were all grinders! Something does not add up here.

    I do think the prospects were good. However, assess their habits, and if they don't measure up, ODC has the best advice, use them to trade for someone who does. He prefers players in the N, I prefer inexperienced players a little younger. 

    Bankier was the prospect that kept catching my eye in the Kurvers' showcase before the season started.  I liked some of the instinctiveness and how he seemed to be in the right place a lot.  I agree he needs to hit the weights a bit more.  I'd also like to see a bit more meanness in his game.  I don't think he'll ever be a star player, but I feel like there is potential there.

    Of all the prospects I'd think I'd trade, I think the first one on my list would be Heidt.  I know a lot of people are high on him, but I just don't see him ever being a force in the NHL.  He's see definitely the one I would sell high on hype.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This doesn’t have anything to do with the article but has anyone taken notice of P. Laine?

    he had a hat trick the other day so he’s got 6 goals and 1 assist in 7 games now. MTL is not a good team but imagine how good he would be on our power play this year. I know he vetoed coming here but I just had a feeling he was going to be good. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    TGAL is right, only about 2/3 1st rounders hit. For a significant piece it's probably more like 50% in most drafts and in some generational drafts it gets closer to 90%.

    However, we can throw that out the window from 2020-2023, maybe '24. Covid shutdowns hurt all of these prospects in key development years. Some will react better than others. In my mind, the teams with the best scouting staffs were the big winners, plumb luck was 2nd, and teams without good scouting will probably whiff. My hope is that the Wild organization had really good scouting. 

    Now, let's evaluate a little, and I do throw Faber into the 2020 class and David Jiricek into the 2022 draft. I know it can be frustrating to need extra development, but for the kids in these drafts, with the shutdowns, it erased a year of their general development. I am also assuming that Judd liked both of these players and had them targeted. It will be interesting to see how Clarke and Faber's careers turn out.

    2020 had some pretty good players just making the rounds. We had hits on Rossi, Khus, Hunt, Faber. I was high on the O'Rourke pick, but O'Rourke really got buzzsawed in the shutdowns. I believe he should have stayed in the A instead of going back to jr. and I think there was an exemption available for that to happen. He had made a lot of progress the 2nd half of his 1st A season. For him to be effective in his game, he needed to build himself to about 210. He is listed at 190+. This will not work and is a development whiff IMO.

    Hunt was almost ready, he was over 200 lbs. and needed NHL minutes, he was a hit. I believe Rossi and Khus are hits too. The rest were just fliers. 

    In 2021, Judd was exceptionally excited about his top 3 picks, which were in his top 20 on his board. Goalies take longer to develop, but The Wall is blocked right now (not by Fleury, but by IR players), and maybe Dermott. Lambos is improving. He made and failed for team Canada. He looked solid to me as a top pairing A defender. He looked like he took bulking up seriously and while he's not listed at 200 lbs. I suspect he's a touch over. 

    Bankier looked like he improved, they have him playing center and he was on a top 6 role while I saw him, with the top 3 forwards playing in St. Paul. I thought he was noticeable and had a nice goal. He needs more strength, hopefully he is bulking up. Peart looks to me to be a solid whiff. He's too small and this is Judd's fault. Judd needs to revamp his defenders. He'd have probably loved Ryan Murphy. Masters had some hype but is stuck between the A and E. I doubt he will be anything more than a solid A player.

    Ohgren, Yurov, Haight, Spacek and Jiricek, to me, all look like they will be hits. Spacek looks like a hard worker. I can't tell a difference in his weight, but he is strong. Haight looked good for a rookie, but still has a lot to learn especially in the dot. I also thought he needed strength. I know we haven't seen Yurov yet, but I think he's coming over to make a much bigger splash than Khus. 

    I'll say it again, if you can get 3-4 hits on draft picks who play a significant role in 2/3 drafts, you can build a dynasty from it. If you look at 2020, include Faber since he was traded for before being an NHL player, that gives us 3 for that draft. 2022 may have 5. 2021 looks like it will have 2 or 3. That is significant.

    We have taken care of the goalie position. Have young reinforcements on defense, and have some nice top 6 caliber forwards, as well as bottom 6. This is a nice core. The 2015 draft will be the leaders as we see some of the placeholders get traded off. 

    Now, the main complaint I have from Iowa is coaching, specifically the defenders. They are playing well structured right now, but they need a guy they respect to "coach" them. Kurvers was a guy they could respect and his absence has not been replaced. They do not bulk up. I do not agree with the theory that it is the player's responsibility to do this, if they don't want to it washes them out. They should know the answer to this question before drafting players, and they should be insisting on bulking instead of conditioning. Many of our drafted prospects do NOT have NHL bodies. If Beckman puts on 15 lbs. of muscle, he's on this team. For whatever reason, consistently, these kids are not putting on the muscle. This is also the main reason why they are not ready. They're simply not big enough.

    Anyone who is not in an NHL body by 22, should be traded for an asset that can help this team. It's that simple. You tell the player up front, to get to the NHL, I need you to weigh X with a body fat index of Y. That's a minimum requirement. Most of these kids have dreams to get there. They are motivated. That's one carrot they need to have in front of them. I believe if O'Rourke had simply gotten to 210, he'd be a 3rd pairing guy by now, mean, nasty, and a great penalty killer. He didn't, and his game simply cannot translate to the N. I don't think you can say that is entirely on the player. That's on the development team, a team of guys that were all grinders! Something does not add up here.

    I do think the prospects were good. However, assess their habits, and if they don't measure up, ODC has the best advice, use them to trade for someone who does. He prefers players in the N, I prefer inexperienced players a little younger. 

    Too long, couldn’t read it 😂

     

     

     

     

     

     

    jk

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    26 minutes ago, Mateo3xm said:

    This doesn’t have anything to do with the article but has anyone taken notice of P. Laine?

    he had a hat trick the other day so he’s got 6 goals and 1 assist in 7 games now. MTL is not a good team but imagine how good he would be on our power play this year. I know he vetoed coming here but I just had a feeling he was going to be good. 

    Given we’re still in cap hell to rid ourselves of the prior attitude problems, Guerin’s pursuit of laine was confusing.  But P-elf he’s turned over a new leaf.  Give it time… Just keep watching…he’ll begin complaining about all the losing in MTL.  Then what?

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 hours ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    Given we’re still in cap hell to rid ourselves of the prior attitude problems, Guerin’s pursuit of laine was confusing.  But P-elf he’s turned over a new leaf.  Give it time… Just keep watching…he’ll begin complaining about all the losing in MTL.  Then what?

    Laine always has been a head case and as good as he can be on the ice he usually becomes  disruptive to the team. Billy's got lucky again by Laine refusing to come here. Are players not willing to come here going to be a problem in the future? Corey Perry said he will pass coming here, Nick Foligno couldn't even be convinced by his brother to come here and the latest is Laine.  I would really be interested to see a list that shows which teams are on how many no trade lists. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I never thought of this org being a place that players wanted to avoid.  That would explain many of Guerin’s extensions to the apathetic old core.  Too much term at too much money.  If that’s the reality maybe I should be less critical of Guerin ability to assess talent because he’s handicapped by players not wanting to come here.  How TF does McBain turn us down?

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 hours ago, Mateo3xm said:

    Too long, couldn’t read it 😂

    That happens to me a lot. Since I type on a PC, it just doesn't look so long. Sometimes I'll read off my phone, and my goodness my stuff looks long! 

    For those of you doing this on phones, I applaud your patience. My screen is constantly jumping around with the ads, and even going from one width to another. I don't know how you can get anything out with all those distractions.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 hours ago, Mateo3xm said:

    I know he vetoed coming here but I just had a feeling he was going to be good. 

    I'm glad he did veto it. This was a very honest move on his part. Heinzy would have required him to play defense, pack it in, and block shots. If he were not committed to do so, a veto was the best outcome. 

    However, I salivate over his potential on the left side of the PP. It would make our PP go from good to elite in my mind. I also think for most of the season he would have had decent linemates. Sadly, all he had to do was hustle and do his best, but he was not committed to such a thing. So we move on.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    For those of you doing this on phones, I applaud your patience. My screen is constantly jumping around with the ads, and even going from one width to another. I don't know how you can get anything out with all those distractions.

    This is 100% valid.  This is a great community and if there was an alternative the mobile experience and ads would have pushed forced me off long ago.  But this is my best escape from my day to day in spite of the sites glitches

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...