Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • Joel Eriksson Ek Is On A Superstar Run When Wild Need It Most


    Image courtesy of Stephen R. Sylvanie-USA TODAY Sports
    Tony Abbott

    As poorly as the Minnesota Wild have played through much of the season, 2023-24 always had the makings of a career year for Joel Eriksson Ek. The ever-improving Swedish center followed up a career-high 61-point season with a hot start, potting 14 goals in his first 26 games. He more or less kept that scoring up, entering Monday's action on-pace for a 38-goal, 68-point year.

    And then Monday happened.

    Yes, nearly all of the Wild's top players were at their best in Monday's bonkers 10-7 (not a typo) win over the Vancouver Canucks. Kirill Kaprizov notched a hat trick and six points. Mats Zuccarello scored a goal en route to a four-point night, and Matt Boldy had a goal and three assists, including a pass that bounced off Eriksson Ek's skate directly into the goal.

    With all due respect to the rest of the Wild's top power-play unit, Monday was Eriksson Ek's game. Pairing a hat trick with another three assists is simply absurd. While Kaprizov did the same thing, he got that last goal by sinking an empty-netter in the final seconds while up two. We're all for padding stats -- run up the score and get those Dolla Dolla Bills -- but that's the deciding factor that tips it Eriksson Ek's way.

    After Monday's simultaneous comeback and thumping against the Presidents Trophy leaders, the Wild are (maybe) back in the playoff race. They finished the game just two points behind the St. Louis Blues with the same number of games. Arguably, the biggest reason for their recent surge is that Joel Eriksson Ek has gone Sicko Mode all over the league. 

    The Wild were seven points out of the playoffs entering February 12's action. But they went 3-1-0 and almost made up that entire gap in the week since. Eriksson Ek's stat line in those games? Seven goals, six assists, 13 points.

    We're talking about some massive, crucial goals, too. Eriksson Ek broke a 1-1 tie against the Vegas Golden Knights in the first period, then sealed the game with an empty net in a 5-3 win. He got Minnesota on the board against the Arizona Coyotes and fed Boldy for the assist on an insurance goal minutes after Logan Cooley drew the 'Yotes within one. Eriksson Ek knotted the Buffalo Sabres game almost instantly after Casey Mittelstadt broke a scoreless tie to open up the third period.

    Then there was Monday, where Eriksson Ek had a hand in four of the five goals Minnesota scored to tie the Canucks. His third goal didn't only secure his hat trick, it gave his team the lead, which they wouldn't relinquish.

    Let's broaden our focus a bit now. The Wild have a 9-3-1 record since a 6-0 shutout loss to the Coyotes that currently serves as the low point of Minnesota's season. What has Eriksson Ek done since then?

    No big deal, he just scored 13 goals and 23 points in 13 games, precisely matching the superstar Kaprizov. Only Auston Matthews has scored more goals in that time (16), and the only players to edge him in points are Hart Trophy candidates Connor McDavid (26) and Matthews. He's tied with Matthew Tkachuk and sitting above the likes of Nathan MacKinnon (10 goals, 22 points), Nikita Kucherov (8 goals, 22 points), and David Pastrnak (9 goals, 20 points).

    Eriksson Ek isn't at that level of play, but it doesn't matter. He's put the Wild on his back and been a horse, dragging Minnesota from draft lottery territory to within inches of a Wild Card spot. Eriksson Ek pulled a reverse-Avatar. When the Wild needed him most, he became That Dude.

    With Eriksson Ek elevating his game, how much higher can he fly down for the Wild's last 27 games? Being on-pace for 38 goals entering Monday put him on 40-Goal Watch. Forget that noise. Bump that pace up to 42 now, which makes this a 40-Goal Warning. Add him now having 51 points in 55 games, and Eriksson Ek is now on track for 76 points, giving him a shot at being an 80-point player. 

    Eriksson Ek will almost certainly cool off from this current streak. He's averaging a goal and 1.77 points per game; it can't last to this degree. Still, Eriksson Ek has all the tools he needs to keep putting up big numbers over the final stretch.

    For one, he's (mostly) playing on the Wild's top line with Kaprizov and Boldy. We know how well Kaprizov is doing, but Boldy is also blisteringly hot on that top line. He's been a vital part of Kaprizov and Boldy's success and has multi-point games in four of his last five outings. That, combined with his net-front role on a power play that's singing with Zuccarello and Brock Faber in charge of it, ensures he'll keep getting plenty of scoring chances. 

    As it stands, Eriksson Ek is already tied with Chris Kreider and Jonathan Marchessault for 14th in the NHL in goals. That isn't a small-sample size bump; we're two-thirds of the way into the season. Entering February 16, Eriksson Ek was fifth in the NHL with 29.9 expected goals, according to Evolving-Hockey. You might look at his 13.8% shooting percentage and think, that's a touch high. Wrong. Given his chances, luck appears to have taken two goals off his total, even after the hat trick.

    The Wild needed something extraordinary to get them back into contention. They got it in the form of their dominant center completely balling out for a baker's dozen worth of games. It's impossible to ask for anything more than what Eriksson Ek's given his team, and Minnesota's best hope of making the playoffs again is to let this magic continue for as long as possible.

    All data via Stathead unless otherwise mentioned.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 2

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    I remember back when we were playing the Canucks in the play-in tourney. Ek was doing his usual thing, got to the front of the net, but, for some reason, was holding his stick upside down and whiffed on a beautiful scoring chance because of it. 

    Now that he's holding his stick the right way, its a lot easier for him to score goals! 

    At that point of his career, I would've never imagined the guy getting close to 30 goals in a season but here we are. Now he's the engine of the team. If only all our prospects could develop a scoring touch as quickly as Ek did after the '19-'20 season. 

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Ek is playing out of his mind right now.  Putting that Kaprizov/Ek/Boldy line together was the best thing Hynes could have done.  I wouldn't have pegged Ek as a Staal-like goal scorer, but here he is now.  Nothing like having someone like Angry Mikko, but he's on all the time.

    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Citizen Strife said:

    Ek is playing out of his mind right now.  Putting that Kaprizov/Ek/Boldy line together was the best thing Hynes could have done.  I wouldn't have pegged Ek as a Staal-like goal scorer, but here he is now.  Nothing like having someone like Angry Mikko, but he's on all the time.

    Something clicked because we have tried for years to put Ek and Kap together with no success.  I think moving on from the bromance of Zucc and Kap probably was key because this line plays a little stronger on the puck.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, Will D. Ness said:

    Something clicked because we have tried for years to put Ek and Kap together with no success.  I think moving on from the bromance of Zucc and Kap probably was key because this line plays a little stronger on the puck.

    I think it helps they added Boldy as well. Before it seemed like it was just one or the other, rarely ever both at the same time. Also probably helps that Boldy and Ek have been developing chemistry since Dean put them together last year.

    If you think about it, its pretty much just a supe'd up version of the Zuccy-Hartman-Kap line. 

    Boldy is an upgraded Zuccy who can make great passes but also is capable of some beautiful goals. Ek plays the 'get to the net' Hartman role perfectly while also providing some better defensive play. And the Kap can just continue to be Kap. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think if Kaprizov and Boldy are going to be half playmaker/half shooters, having someone like Ek at the front is great.  He's developed an almost killer instinct for not only screening, but net front shots on his own, and no one can take the puck from him.  He's a +15 on the season, so his offensive skillset hasn't dulled his defensive prowess at all.  He may not be the flashiest player on any line, but he just IS the line.  Kaprizov elevates who he plays with, Boldy is a solid but inconsistent scorer and playdriver, but I think all of their skillsets just mesh.  Kaprizov can pass AND shoot and make both work because Ek is there.  Boldy can shoot first when he needs to, so either option is a huge threat, unlike Zuccarello and Kaprizov, who always seemed to defer first, rather than trust themselves.  Ek is a better center option than Hartman, because he plays heavy without losing discipline.  If he takes penalties, it's more a result of getting punched in the face so much and refs being dumb, rather than him being at fault.

    I'm not saying the line is always going to score every time out, but they haven't been stopped yet.  Don't stop that train now.

    Edited by Citizen Strife
    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I pegged JEEk as the Chuck Fletcher archetypal player in his draft year. His attributes absolutely sounded like a guy the Wild would pick. 200 foot guy, center with size, plays hard, didn't score much. 

    And he pretty much was that his first two seasons. A good, reliable player, but never a player that was going to rise to star level.

    Then something changed the season the Wild played the Golden Knights in the postseason. He began scoring goals by adding the most important factor to his game that has led him to this point - going to the paint. Add up his shots game to game, I bet it won't add up to more than 6 feet from the goalmouth. He did what Zach Parise was so good at for so long, but with his size and strength, can battle with the best. Instead of trying to score from distance, he realized that he needs to score by being at the net.

    I asked Tony if JEEk is a star yet just a couple weeks ago. While not a star, he's absolutely a stud for the Wild.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    13 hours ago, joebou15 said:

    I pegged JEEk as the Chuck Fletcher archetypal player in his draft year. His attributes absolutely sounded like a guy the Wild would pick. 200 foot guy, center with size, plays hard, didn't score much. 

    And he pretty much was that his first two seasons. A good, reliable player, but never a player that was going to rise to star level.

    Then something changed the season the Wild played the Golden Knights in the postseason. He began scoring goals by adding the most important factor to his game that has led him to this point - going to the paint. Add up his shots game to game, I bet it won't add up to more than 6 feet from the goalmouth. He did what Zach Parise was so good at for so long, but with his size and strength, can battle with the best. Instead of trying to score from distance, he realized that he needs to score by being at the net.

    I asked Tony if JEEk is a star yet just a couple weeks ago. While not a star, he's absolutely a stud for the Wild.

    He's been my favorite Wild player for a few seasons now. I think league wide he wouldn't be viewed as a star by fans but to most MN fans I think he qualifies as just that. I'd be willing to bet also if you polled NHL players and coaches they'd say he's a star, maybe even a superstar..

    giphy.gif

    Edited by Willy the poor boy
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I’ve seen a few references to him as a superstar lately, and as evidence that you don’t need high draft picks to find championship caliber players.

    Im not there yet.  He’s a great player…not ready to label him a “superstar.”

    In 26 career playoff games, he’s got more penalty minutes (12) than points (10).  He’s well under 50% for his career on face offs.  A high percentage of his points come from the PP (not bad, just an observation regarding his 5v5 scoring).  The team’s record in the playoff since he’s been on the team is 10-23, and they’ve been out scored by 32 goals in those games, and have had poor PP and PK percentages in most years.  They haven’t won a series over that time frame.

    I know one player can’t do it by themselves and he’s just now entering his “prime.”  But, a “superstar” doesn’t get their butt kicked in the playoffs 6 years in a row with decent supporting casts around them.  In my mind, you have to put Matthews/McDavid type numbers to be considers a “superstar” on regular season performances alone.

    Thats also what’s holding Kaprisov back from true superstar status also, IMO.  He’s a -5 with 18 PIM and 12 points in 19 games.  Two of those years consist of 13 games with 4 points and a -6.  Last year agains the Stars, he had a 5.9% shot %.

    I think we need to be careful referring to these guys as superstars, and proof that you can win championships without high draft picks.  These guys have stunk in the playoffs and have won nothing.

    If you look at the top producers on the the last 5 Stanley Cup champs:  

    Knights:  Kessel, Pietrangelo, Eichel all drafted top 10.  Various other on top 15.

    Avs: MacKinnon, Makar, Rantanen, Kadri, Landeskog, Nichuskin all drafted top   Various others in top 15.

    Lightning:  Stamkos, Hedman, Sergacehev, all top 10 (McDonagh was 12, Foote was 14).

    Blues: Schenn, Pietrangelo, Bouwmeester  top 10 (and numerous others drafted in the top 15).

    I don’t see any evidence of winning Stanley Cups while picking in the 20s every year.  We have 4 forwards and 1 defenseman on our entire roster that we’re drafted in the first round.  Not a single player drafted in the top 10.  2 in the top 20.

    Sure, some guys slip through the cracks.  But, it sure seems like you need highly talented players who are drafted highly to win a championship (in addition to multiple guys like Ek drafted in the 20s - and diamonds found in later rounds like Kucherov, Kaprisov, etc.).

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, Beast said:

    We have 4 forwards and 1 defenseman on our entire roster that we’re drafted in the first round.  Not a single player drafted in the top 10.  2 in the top 20.

    You need to count again.

    Rossi was drafted 9th overall and Brodin was drafted 10th overall.

    And if you are doing to include Kessel, Pietrangelo, and Eichel for Vegas just because they are on the roster even though they weren't drafted by the team they are on, then you have to include Fleury (1st overall) and Bogosian (3rd overall) for the Wild.

    And if you are going to note players drafted just out of the top 10 for other teams, you can also mention Boldy at 12.

    Ek and Johansson were also in the first round, just later on, so there are more first rounders than you say.  You could make a case that our high first rounders aren't like theirs, but instead you are making claims that simply aren't true to make us seem worse than we are.

    And that's not counting anyone outside of the NHL.  We have a lot of 1st rounders who are still developing.

    Your criticizing the current team for Fletcher trading away first round picks and prospects, therefore requiring us to get rid of our old cores in order to build through having more first round picks.  The roster is in transition.

    If it's just high firsts on the roster than mean you win Stanley Cups, then based on that, I guess we're a contender.  I wouldn't say that, but I would say that we at least as good as Saint Louis when they won.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...