Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • Is Next Summer the Time For the Wild To Strike?


    Image courtesy of Brace Hemmelgam-USA Today Sports
    Tony Abbott

    The shackles of the Zach Parise and Ryan Suter buyout penalties don't come off until Summer 2025. The Minnesota Wild are sagging under the burden of $14.7-plus million of dead cap space this season, and that will hold steady next year. Once the league calendar flips over in July 2025 and knocks $13 million of those penalties, the Wild can make some moves. Until then, the team is locked in a holding pattern.

    Or are they?

    This summer, the Wild not only had to contend with the dead cap hits, but a very inflexible roster situation. The free agents they lost were mostly trade acquisitions from last season in Ryan Reaves, John Klingberg, Gustav Nyquist, and Oskar Sundqvist. Over the course of partial seasons, those players had cap impacts so minimal that they provided little relief.

    Only Matt Dumba, whose $6 million cap hit expired this summer, gave Minnesota any wiggle room. The problem is, that money was spoken for all the way back in February, when Matt Boldy signed a contract raising his pay from near-league-minimum to $7 million. It was a fantastic use of that money, but it didn't provide many options for this summer.

    But next year? That's a different story. The buyouts stay the same, yes, but expiring money gives the Wild much more flexibility in Summer 2024. Maybe even enough to effectively end their buyout pain a year early. Minnesota has seven players set to hit UFA status next summer, so let's take a quick look at their expiring cap hits:

    Mats Zuccarello, $6 million
    Marc-Andre Fleury, $3.5 million
    Marcus Foligno, $3.1 million
    Alex Goligoski, $2 million
    Ryan Hartman, $1.7 million
    Brandon Duhaime, $1.1 million
    Pat Maroon, $0.8 million

    With just three players making over $3 million in this bunch, and only one making over $4 million, this doesn't look like a wealth of cap space. In the aggregate, though, that's $18 million of expiring money that they can re-shuffle back into their decks, if they so choose.

    Better yet, none of these players should be considered a core piece of the team's future. It's possible for the team to re-sign any of these players for a short-term deal, we suppose. But seeing as Zuccarello, Fleury, Foligno, Goligoski, and Maroon are either approaching, in, or well past their mid-30s and Hartman is due for a big raise, it's probably preferable to move on from most of these names.

    Even better, very little, if any of that $18 million in expiring cap is going to be spoken for. Connor Dewar is the only player scheduled for RFA status, and he's not going to command anything near Boldy money. Calen Addison might be due, should the Wild sign him to a one-year deal. But he's already become the new Dumba, with his future with the team constantly in question.

    Then there's the breathing room coming due for the rest of the league. Because the players need a better union, they've been forced to pay back a portion of the losses incurred by teams during the COVID pandemic. This has kept the salary cap artificially stagnant, but the players will pay off their debts next year. CapFriendly is projecting a cap increase of $4 million, which gives Minnesota even more space to work with. 

    That extra $22 million is going to have to help them fill 11 spots on a 23-player roster. Still, it's a far cry from where they were at this year. Believe it or not, the rosy picture of Minnesota's spending power gets rosier when you consider this: The Wild are poised to replace some of those players with cheap, cheap contracts.

    Marc-Andre Fleury's heir apparent is perhaps the most obvious, seeing as Jesper Wallstedt will complete a second season in North America this year. Wallstedt played 40 AHL games between the regular season and playoffs in his rookie campaign, and the Iowa Wild are probably poised to see if he can handle more this year. That should have him ready for backup duty in the NHL in 2024-25, meaning the Wild won't have to sign a more expensive replacement for Fleury.

    Marat Khusnutdinov will transition to North America, and if he builds on his stellar KHL season, he might be ready for top-nine duty right away. The fast, pesky forward can fill that Ryan Hartman center/winger/shitkicker role for half the cost they're paying Hartman now. Goligoski only got 46 games last year, and that's sixth/seventh defense duty. Incoming players like Adam Beckman, Daemon Hunt, Danila Yurov, and Liam Öhgren could also potentially step in on entry-level deals.

    The hardest roles to replace will probably be Foligno (unless they slot in Duhaime for that role at a cheaper cap hit than Foligno enjoys now) and Zuccarello. Especially Zuccarello, who finished the season with 67 points in 78 games, second on the team. The veteran winger and Kaprizov's bestie would be 37 to start any new contract, so there's a good chance the Wild were going to have to replace his scoring anyway. But next year, they'll have the ammunition to do so, mostly using the dollars they've been allotting to Zuccarello.

    Theoretically, the Wild could fit even the biggest fish into a salary structure. For example, if the salary cap is at $87.5 million next year, Evolving Hockey projects pending UFA William Nylander to break the bank at a $10.1 million cap hit. The Wild could fit that into their plans with just that expiring $18 million like so:

    Nylander (for Zuccarello): $10.1 million
    Wallstedt (for Fleury): $925K
    Foligno: $2.67 million
    Hunt (for Goligoski): $828K
    Khusnutdinov (for Hartman): $925K
    Duhaime: $1.5 million
    Beckman (for Maroon): $894K

    All that adds up to... $17,842,000. It's like going stars and scrubs at a fantasy football roster, only the "scrubs" are your top prospects. Again, that's just with the expiring UFA money, not any gains they'll get from the cap increasing. 

    It doesn't have to be Nylander, either, of course. That's just the youngest, best, most expensive free agent we could think of. There will certainly be players we don't see as being on the move now that might be loosened. If the next Mark Stone, Jack Eichel, or Matthew Tkachuk-type trade opportunity presents itself next summer, the Wild have the assets and just enough flexibility to make that work.

    The State of Hockey seems to be content waiting for the next two years to go past before making a move towards contention. But there are some major reasons to not see patience as a virtue next summer.

    Making a move next year puts the Wild right back into contention, and avoids wasting another year of Kaprizov, Boldy, and Joel Eriksson Ek's prime. With key defensemen now in their 30s, too, it's wiser to try to make your window start next year, when Jared Spurgeon and Jonas Brodin are 35 and 31, respectively, than in 2025-26, when they'll be 36 and 32. That extra year might not seem like much, but it can make all the difference.

    It would let the Wild take full advantage of an extra year of entry-level contracts, which are gold in the NHL. After this season, Marco Rossi and Brock Faber will have one more year of making under a million dollars before they hit RFA status and a due a raise. That's an incredibly valuable asset, but only if it facilitates the team becoming a contender. If the Wild are kinda-sorta punting on being Stanley Cup competitive in 2024-25, they're leaving a lot of value on the table for those two, not to mention the ELC years they'd burn from Wallstedt, Khusnutdinov, et al.

    And finally, it's an opportunity to make a big pitch to Kaprizov to stick around for the future. The Wild will get a truckload of money with which to re-sign him, but Kaprizov will get paid wherever he goes. Getting to play with another impact player in 2024-25 and being true contenders is a much better pitch to get him to stay than having him stuck in the mushy middle with a year to dwell on him not having his best friend anymore.

    Even if he does decide to leave, the Wild would still be in a better spot than if they hadn't made a splash to get an impact player.

    Minnesota's cap situation has been an incredible bummer. The buyouts made this summer boring to watch, and we're on Year 3 of it making the Wild worse than they should be. But the good news is: relief might come in half the time that we'd expect.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 3

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Next summer and the following summer will have to be the transition points to get this franchise right. At that point we’ll know how good the talent eval has been and we can pivot to a new plan. But please don’t blow the cap $ on a couple guys with long-term deals again.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    What we don't have is that developED #1C that can slide in and be dynamic with Kaprizov. 

    That is the rub isn't it.  If:

    1) You draft poorly

    2) or you do not have a high enough draft pick to get the player of need

    3) or your player development is not capable.

    Result:  then you must over pay for that need.    We see these trades happen often and they can and do work.... others fail.  The trick is to do it without leveraging the future... which we have seen our GMs prior to BG do.  It is quite the song and dance GMs must pull off to make those stars align and make a legit cup run.  It requires the perfect balance of Drafting well, Releasing aging players at the right time, developing players quickly and snagging that one key cog at the trade deadline to bring it all together.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    And, this is the argument, do you take the sure thing to pair with Kaprizov, or do you develop the talent, likely more inexpensive, and incrementally improve? 

    Pettersson is a Brackett guy. I would assume that Brackett would be pounding the table for him. In fact, I just read a little about the contract negotiations for him. They are quiet. Vancouver is eyeing the Aho contract as a comparable. It is believed that Pettersson wants >$10m. $11m was suggested. 

    Vancouver gets Pettersson for another year. What would it take for us to bring him in.....now? A key question to ask: Is Vancouver on a lot of player's NTC lists? We would need to shed money and I'd have to think that Zuccarello would be at the top of that list. I could also see Foligno being on that list. Rossi would also have to be on that list as Vancouver is like us, too many wings, not enough centers. 

    Timing is everything here. Perhaps Shooter even talks about some parameters for next season if Vancouver shows up on too many lists? My thought on this is simple, if Pettersson becomes available, you have to go get him and deal with the consequences. Finding Zuccarello a home is a must. Don't worry about Kaprizov, bank on the fact that he wants to win, and playing with a world class center in Pettersson is a way to win.

    Would Pettersson want to come here? I would have to say yes, absolutely! He knows he'd get to play next to world class wing in Kaprizov and has fellow countrymen all over the roster to also play with. In fact, if the deal is that Pettersson wants to win, I'd say this franchise looks brighter than almost all others. Why? Because we've got cap space coming and an infusion of talent almost ready and we're already winning.

    What about Draisaitl? I absolutely believe that Edmonton will find a way to keep him. He's not as disgruntled, as Edmonton has been winning and has advanced in the playoffs. My bet is that Edmonton will trade or let go of RNH before Draisaitl, so I believe he's going to stay, plus, he has a tremendous chemistry with McDavid. I'd love to have him here, but am less optimistic that this could happen.

    Nothing is going to happen now and I do not want to sacrifice the unknown of all these prospects or draft capitol in a trade, plus the fact financially it would cut too deep into our game plan for the next year, two years. 

    In another year, it would be nice to look at, but I'm not willing to mortgage the future now. In 2024-25, I would love to have Pettersson, or Nylander in that order, but not Draisaitl who I think benefits a lot from McDavid and may not be what he seems without him. No one else interests me with the chance to show Yurov some ice time with KK.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, MNCountryLife said:

    That is the rub isn't it.  If:

    1) You draft poorly

    2) or you do not have a high enough draft pick to get the player of need

    3) or your player development is not capable.

    Result:  then you must over pay for that need.    We see these trades happen often and they can and do work.... others fail.  The trick is to do it without leveraging the future... which we have seen our GMs prior to BG do.  It is quite the song and dance GMs must pull off to make those stars align and make a legit cup run.  It requires the perfect balance of Drafting well, Releasing aging players at the right time, developing players quickly and snagging that one key cog at the trade deadline to bring it all together.

    :classic_cool: "IBGIT" :classic_cool:

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, Willy the poor boy said:

    Sure, of course. But, it isn't automatic. Years and years ago Many thought Tom Brady was cooked after the ACL He went on to win how many more SB's? Odds are against him but everyone is different. I'm not writing him off until I see another down season.

    I too don't count out Zucci, he could surprise us all. Zucci is due to have a healthy season at some point. He is more than a sidekick to KK, he is an informal leader who many respect in the locker room. He is quiet in the media, but a loud voice in the locker room.

    I know he is injury prone based on the past few years. The Wild have gotten a lot of run out of him for the $6 million investment, plus the fact he is KK's BFF on and off the ice.

    I have to believe this could be the last season for him and he will ride off into the sunset to spend time with his daughter. Zucci will be assuring KK the Russian connection will protect him in Yurov, and Khusnutdinov who will ready to step in with the Wild, while Yurov marinates in IA.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm of the opinion (and have been since Parise and Suter were bought out) that the move to jettison these older veteran guys for the prospects is eventually going to be the right move. You can see who sticks, who cannot and when the money really becomes available, fill in the roster holes with a couple FA veterans. But other than that, these kids should get a shot. 

    "They all can't play here," says major market media guy, but what if you had a roster almost entirely homegrown, drafted and developed, kept the draft churning, and won? That's how you build a dynasty. 

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 hours ago, joebou15 said:

    "They all can't play here," says major market media guy, but what if you had a roster almost entirely homegrown, drafted and developed, kept the draft churning, and won? That's how you build a dynasty. 

    Yes! The odds are that most of the prospects don’t really make much of an impact anyway. So having a lot of talent in the pipeline is the way to go. I like the pool of prospects we have but we gotta get the center position figured out (still).

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    18 hours ago, FredJohnson said:

    Next summer and the following summer will have to be the transition points to get this franchise right. At that point we’ll know how good the talent eval has been and we can pivot to a new plan. But please don’t blow the cap $ on a couple guys with long-term deals again.

    Guerin won't do that unless for a special situation maybe involving a trade & sign. Guerin deals with term have been very safe with the exception of Spurgeon. Many would not view that poorly because of his total contribution to the Wild.

    I think your description is what Guerin likely had in mind a few years ago. He's evaluated and locked in some important guys cultivating a core & culture. From this point, there is lots of options despite very little money. The Wild are good. The options will improve even more before too long. It's going pretty good, I think. We knew this time was coming but it's not bad.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    16 hours ago, joebou15 said:

    That's how you build a dynasty. 

    I suspect that is what Guerin is trying to build, more than just a Cup run, but a longterm run at the hardest trophy to obtain!

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This could be an under the radar depth piece that might be interesting  to go after .   Hartsy could go wing and i dont think we need both Foligno and Maroon  .  Just as long as Rossi gets his fair shot .

     

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 8/15/2023 at 8:44 PM, Dango said:

    This could be an under the radar depth piece that might be interesting  to go after .   Hartsy could go wing and i dont think we need both Foligno and Maroon  .  Just as long as Rossi gets his fair shot .

     

    Do it.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 8/15/2023 at 10:14 AM, Protec said:

    Guerin won't do that unless for a special situation maybe involving a trade & sign. Guerin deals with term have been very safe with the exception of Spurgeon. Many would not view that poorly because of his total contribution to the Wild.

    I think your description is what Guerin likely had in mind a few years ago. He's evaluated and locked in some important guys cultivating a core & culture. From this point, there is lots of options despite very little money. The Wild are good. The options will improve even more before too long. It's going pretty good, I think. We knew this time was coming but it's not bad.

    Just to be clear, I'm talking about 2+ years from now. BG would mo def-nily be premature putting any significant cash on free agents now even if he could. Frankly, I think we'll need most of our cap to sign Kiril and the next crop of guys coming next. But if that next crop has a low yield, then BG goes FA shopping.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...