Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • Is Marco Rossi A Better Fit On the First Line?


    Image courtesy of Gary A. Vasquez-Imagn Images
    Phillip Garrett

    The Minnesota Wild are rolling. 

    They have been keeping games close and often coming out with a win. Much of the Wild’s success has been due to their key pieces staying healthy. However, all good things must end. 

    Entering the 10th week of the season, the Wild are missing Mats Zuccarello, Jonas Brodin, Joel Eriksson Ek, and Jakub Lauko due to injury. Lauko is the only one slated to return soon. The Wild expect him to return before their first visit to Salt Lake City. With the recent influx of injuries, Hynes has had to juggle some lines. A few players have had to step up in their absence. 

    We all know what happened to Zuccarello. However, the only positive development is that Matt Boldy has shone in his absence. 

    The Wild will miss Brodin, but the Wild have performed well defensively. Minnesota’s other blueliners, including Jon Merrill, have stepped up. 

    However, the hole Eriksson Ek left in his absence is concerning. The Wild have kept games close. With a defensive mindset first and a below-average powerplay, Minnesota scored at a mediocre rate. Entering the season’s second quarter, the Wild are 13th in the league in GF with 86 and GF/GP at 3.19.

    Enter Marco Rossi. After the Wild put Eriksson Ek on IR, Rossi has gotten a chance to prove again that he’s not a bust. On December 6, during their first game in a California doubleheader, Rossi got to try out playing between Kirill Kaprizov and Matt Boldy.

    He made the most of his opportunity. Rossi came home with two goals and three points, two of which came at even strength. Put anyone between players like Kaprizov and Boldy, and they will thrive. Still, Ek had just suffered a lower-body injury, and Rossi was still putting up points. 

    Rossi has scored six points in his last five games, and only two were on the powerplay. Furthermore, his numbers have been good all season. Rossi has scored nine goals and 23 points in 25 games. He is on pace to finish the season with 78 points. I doubt he will get to those numbers, but his best chance would be between Kaprizov and Boldy or Zuccarello. 

    But what about when Eriksson Ek returns? Should he rejoin the first line and bump Rossi down the lineup? In my opinion, no. Despite the issues that Ek has been experiencing with injuries, the center has been underperforming in areas where he previously thrived. 

    For example, Eriksson Ek is typically productive on the powerplay. In the last three seasons, Ek has found the back of the net 12 times with the man advantage, averaging 20 powerplay points alongside his goals. Conversely, Eriksson Ek has one powerplay goal and only two powerplay points this season. Considering the Wild are ranked 19th in PP% at 19.4%, we could use the old Ek. 

    Ek hasn’t looked much better at five-on-five, having only scored five goals and 13 points this season. Even with Rossi and Ek in the lineup, Rossi has been the most impressive player. Rossi seems like the more skilled forward, so he fits well between Boldy and Kaprizov. While Ek has succeeded on the first line, his best seasons have come with the team's more checking-focused lines. 

    Eriksson Ek plays physical hockey and looks for his scoring down and around the net. Given his size, you’d think he’d find scoring opportunities from the talented forwards throwing the puck on the net. Still, with Kaprizov’s elevated gameplay, the first line has been playing east-west, not north-south. For Eriksson Ek to continue his career success, he must be on a line that focuses on getting the puck to the net and staying there. He hasn’t found that this year. 

    On the other hand, Rossi has kept up with Kaprizov and Boldy and scored alongside them. Rossi’s contract is a fifth of the size of Ek’s. However, I expect that to change at the end of the year if the Wild stick with Rossi. Still, some people think that the Wild will trade Rossi, and how Minnesota has treated the young center supports this theory.

    Although he has built on his 40-point season from last year, Rossi must continue to prove himself over the already established center core. Eriksson Ek is a talented player who likely isn’t playing to his standard this season. Therefore, Rossi likely has limited time to make his case as the best center in Minnesota. 

    The Wild have been looking for a No. 1 center to fit on their highly talented first line, and fans have been begging for real center depth for years. Minnesota has found that depth. Let's hope Hynes makes the right decision and keeps betting on No. 23 because he has solidified the Wild up the middle this season and can for years to come. 

    If they begin to trust the young center, they can lock him in for a long time after this season. With Rossi’s slowly developing career, his contract could likely be team-friendly. 

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 3

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    8 hours ago, RedLake said:

    Package Rossi, Yurov, and a 1st for Brady. Rossi will get rag-dolled and spit on in the playoffs.

    They aren’t trading Brady you newb. Why can’t people get this out of their head? He’s their best player and he’s only 24….

    imagine how good he’ll be in 2-3 years. He’s on contract for 3 more years and it’s a very cheap contract considering how good he is. If you’re going to propose it then site a reasonable source that reports this possibly happening. There is no truth to it.

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    19 minutes ago, Mateo3xm said:

    They aren’t trading Brady you newb. Why can’t people get this out of their head? He’s their best player and he’s only 24….

    imagine how good he’ll be in 2-3 years. He’s on contract for 3 more years and it’s a very cheap contract considering how good he is. If you’re going to propose it then site a reasonable source that reports this possibly happening. There is no truth to it.

    I think anyone listening to what is coming out of Ottawa knows this. The GM straight up said "I can tell you 100 percent there’s never actually been an ounce of discussion about Brady Tkachuk being anything other than an Ottawa Senator." after the trade speculation with the Rangers. There is no way he is going anywhere. I doubt they would let him go even if he requested a trade to be honest.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, FredJohnson said:

    Kap is one inch taller.

    But Kap is 20 pounds heavier (according to what's published).

    And 97 is a superstar while Rossi is currently a good player with promise.  So this comparison is apples and oranges

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    35 minutes ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    And 97 is a superstar while Rossi is currently a good player with promise.  So this comparison is apples and oranges

    My point is that 97 is like Liam Neeson and has a "special set of skills" that others don't possess.  So to say Rossi and 97 are similar size, so Rossi should be able to do the things 97 can do, does not compute.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, Mateo3xm said:

    They aren’t trading Brady you newb. Why can’t people get this out of their head? He’s their best player and he’s only 24….

    imagine how good he’ll be in 2-3 years. He’s on contract for 3 more years and it’s a very cheap contract considering how good he is. If you’re going to propose it then site a reasonable source that reports this possibly happening. There is no truth to it.

    We understand, relax. How is Matt Tkachuk doing in Calgary and Eichel in buffalo?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I watch 2 games a year of Ottawa, so I don't have a good handle on their situation. Tkachuk's wear their emotions on their sleeves. Body language would easily tell if Brady Tkachuk was sick of losing and wanted out. 

    Don't go by reports, or their beat guy, go by what we see of Tkachuk on the ice. I heard the "blockbuster" was with LeFrieniere. The #1 overall in his draft year who has struggled, even though he was supposed to be a generational player. Yeah, if I'm Staios, I'm not entertaining that either. 

    I've never seen a Tkachuk quit. But I've seen Tkachuk's take out their frustrations on opponents leaving a swath of destruction behind them. Perhaps we need to spend a little time watching Ottawa games, how they respond after letting in a bad goal, how they respond after losing? 

    I am convinced that Staios will not trade the player unless he is completely convinced he's lost him. To this, I would have a scout at almost every Ottawa game paying attention to body language, specifically of the target. It won't be hard to pick up, you don't even need a body language expert. Just look for the spewing volcano.

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, MNCountryLife said:

    Edmonton just bitch slapped us into next week.  Want to know how we stack up against Edmonton when Ek and Brodin are out of the line up.  We don't.  

    How would Edmonton do without Draisaitl (2C), Kapenen (2W), Brown (4W) and Ekholm (1D)?

    It’s a miracle we beat Utah - we’re so beat up.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, mnfaninnc said:

    I watch 2 games a year of Ottawa, so I don't have a good handle on their situation. Tkachuk's wear their emotions on their sleeves. Body language would easily tell if Brady Tkachuk was sick of losing and wanted out. 

    Don't go by reports, or their beat guy, go by what we see of Tkachuk on the ice. I heard the "blockbuster" was with LeFrieniere. The #1 overall in his draft year who has struggled, even though he was supposed to be a generational player. Yeah, if I'm Staios, I'm not entertaining that either. 

    I've never seen a Tkachuk quit. But I've seen Tkachuk's take out their frustrations on opponents leaving a swath of destruction behind them. Perhaps we need to spend a little time watching Ottawa games, how they respond after letting in a bad goal, how they respond after losing? 

    I am convinced that Staios will not trade the player unless he is completely convinced he's lost him. To this, I would have a scout at almost every Ottawa game paying attention to body language, specifically of the target. It won't be hard to pick up, you don't even need a body language expert. Just look for the spewing volcano.

    This plus you never know - maybe a scenario to retool with grade a prospect and young center Rossi would peak their interest 

    sometimes it’s about making the change to get team and fans excited and prolong your employment…..cause Ottawa is not really a winning team….haven’t been since days of heater and spezza

    So that’s why they’d consider 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Quote

    “The reason I signed a seven-year deal is because I believe in this team, in what we’re doing and I believe in everybody,” Tkachuk said. “Not just in this room, but everybody in this building that we’re pushing in the right direction. I signed here for seven years because I love playing here.”

    Brady Tkachuk- December 10 2024

     

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    32 minutes ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    Did anyone watch Stramel play last night?

    No, but he got 0 pts and a holding penalty.

    Edited by Sam
    Added info.
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    21 hours ago, OldDutchChip said:

    This plus you never know - maybe a scenario to retool with grade a prospect and young center Rossi would peak their interest 

    sometimes it’s about making the change to get team and fans excited and prolong your employment…..cause Ottawa is not really a winning team….haven’t been since days of heater and spezza

    So that’s why they’d consider 

    Let's explore this a little further. Is it the mix of players or is it the youth?

    Claude Girioux and David Perron are the forwards supposed to be leading this group. Travis Homonic and Nick Jensen are supposed to be leading the defense. That's their veteran guys who are paid for their leadership and what they've done in the past.

    But, their core is:

    • Stutzle $8.35m  22
    • Tkachuk $8.2m  25
    • Norris $7.95m  25
    • Batherson $4.975m 26
    • Pinto $3.75m 24
    • Sanderson $8m 22
    • Chabot $8m 27
    • Zub $4.6m  29
    • Ullmark $8.25m  31

    These are the guys who are supposed to be getting it done. They are good, young, exciting, and lightly structured. It looks to me that their core is young and good, but their supporting cast is letting them down. 

    Their top 6 looks like they can compete with anyone. Their center depth looks very deep, in fact, they've got several playing wing. On defense, they appear to have some good puck moving defenders that can support the top 6. I would expect their PP to be top 10 with these guys. 

    As an organization, everything has settled down. New ownership is in town, new GM, new coach. Are we witnessing an acclimation period?

    I don't know much about Steve Staios, but Travis Green seems to be a front line coach. Staios came up through the ranks in Toronto, Edmonton, and most of his playing career was with Canadian teams. He's got a similar track record with a different organization to Bill Guerin when we hired him. Former player, a GM in major juniors (Guerin doesn't have that), and he spent some time under Ken Holland who would be a similar mentor like Jim Rutherford. 

    Everything I'm looking at looks solid, so why can't they win? The only thing I can put my finger on is that their defense is leaky. They are a lot better going forward than they are defending. 

    Based upon that, I would say that a young center in Rossi would likely be switched to wing, as they are deep down the middle. I wouldn't think they'd be too excited about that except he played his jr. hockey in the town and people remember the name. As for Buium, I'd think that would be the wrong pick up unless they see him as a 200' defender. But most of what we see from him is PP QB, putting up points on a dominant team, is he the defender that they need? I would think that both Brodin and Middleton would be more useful for them than Buium. I would think pairing Sanderson and Chabot with a stay at home defender would probably help everyone get better. 

    So, while they have plenty of guys who can put on a show, where I see the lacking is those shutdown guys like our 3rd/4th line (when healthy) and our left handed D pairs. Chisholm could be interesting because while he can skate the puck up, he is also learning structural defense. We do have a glut of defensive defenders, and 3 of those guys are adequate in the offensive side. Could they use a guy like Spurgeon? Absolutely! I still haven't figured out why Lassi Tomson hasn't made their team. Zub is on LTIR, and Perron is out (Zub looks like he may have broken his foot). 

    IMO, a jolt is what this team needs, and that jolt can be internal or external. If I were in Staios' shoes, I look at my cap and it's almost maxed. I look at my team and see that one weakness, and will be looking for a guy who can bring that defense on the 1st pair and shutdown opponents. Everywhere else, this team looks like it should be at minimum in the WC hunt. I'm thinking tweak, not blockbuster from their standpoint.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    Did he make you notice him?  Strong forecheck?  net front presence (i saw he screened one of the goals)? passing ability?

    I didn’t get to watch it, I was watching the UND game. I would imagine he contributed in other ways than just scoresheet-wise.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    Let's explore this a little further. Is it the mix of players or is it the youth?

    Claude Girioux and David Perron are the forwards supposed to be leading this group. Travis Homonic and Nick Jensen are supposed to be leading the defense. That's their veteran guys who are paid for their leadership and what they've done in the past.

    But, their core is:

    • Stutzle $8.35m  22
    • Tkachuk $8.2m  25
    • Norris $7.95m  25
    • Batherson $4.975m 26
    • Pinto $3.75m 24
    • Sanderson $8m 22
    • Chabot $8m 27
    • Zub $4.6m  29
    • Ullmark $8.25m  31

    These are the guys who are supposed to be getting it done. They are good, young, exciting, and lightly structured. It looks to me that their core is young and good, but their supporting cast is letting them down. 

    Their top 6 looks like they can compete with anyone. Their center depth looks very deep, in fact, they've got several playing wing. On defense, they appear to have some good puck moving defenders that can support the top 6. I would expect their PP to be top 10 with these guys. 

    As an organization, everything has settled down. New ownership is in town, new GM, new coach. Are we witnessing an acclimation period?

    I don't know much about Steve Staios, but Travis Green seems to be a front line coach. Staios came up through the ranks in Toronto, Edmonton, and most of his playing career was with Canadian teams. He's got a similar track record with a different organization to Bill Guerin when we hired him. Former player, a GM in major juniors (Guerin doesn't have that), and he spent some time under Ken Holland who would be a similar mentor like Jim Rutherford. 

    Everything I'm looking at looks solid, so why can't they win? The only thing I can put my finger on is that their defense is leaky. They are a lot better going forward than they are defending. 

    Based upon that, I would say that a young center in Rossi would likely be switched to wing, as they are deep down the middle. I wouldn't think they'd be too excited about that except he played his jr. hockey in the town and people remember the name. As for Buium, I'd think that would be the wrong pick up unless they see him as a 200' defender. But most of what we see from him is PP QB, putting up points on a dominant team, is he the defender that they need? I would think that both Brodin and Middleton would be more useful for them than Buium. I would think pairing Sanderson and Chabot with a stay at home defender would probably help everyone get better. 

    So, while they have plenty of guys who can put on a show, where I see the lacking is those shutdown guys like our 3rd/4th line (when healthy) and our left handed D pairs. Chisholm could be interesting because while he can skate the puck up, he is also learning structural defense. We do have a glut of defensive defenders, and 3 of those guys are adequate in the offensive side. Could they use a guy like Spurgeon? Absolutely! I still haven't figured out why Lassi Tomson hasn't made their team. Zub is on LTIR, and Perron is out (Zub looks like he may have broken his foot). 

    IMO, a jolt is what this team needs, and that jolt can be internal or external. If I were in Staios' shoes, I look at my cap and it's almost maxed. I look at my team and see that one weakness, and will be looking for a guy who can bring that defense on the 1st pair and shutdown opponents. Everywhere else, this team looks like it should be at minimum in the WC hunt. I'm thinking tweak, not blockbuster from their standpoint.

    Might be cohesiveness or just not enough of skill against the east or who knows what

    but I’m serious - GM may pull the trigger just to keep his job in place for a bit longer and get some prospects in for stutzle, who Is very young (build around Stutzle and trade BT)

    just like stone and eichel and M tkachuk - 25/26 - Brady may be on the move and Wild have the pieces 

    Rossi Pick Prospect and Trenin! For Tkachuk and salary retention for this year

    Edited by OldDutchChip
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    Did anyone watch Stramel play last night?

    Yep. He looked pretty good to me. He didn't score but goal tending was excellent. He was tough on the puck and a constant net front guy. He had a little nasty to him also. Speed seemed good. I liked his game.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, OldDutchChip said:

    just like stone and eichel and M tkachuk - 25/26 - Brady may be on the move and Wild have the pieces 

    Yet, we all knew about Stone, Eichel, and M. Tkachuk. There really wasn't any denying it. That's why I think Brady will need to make the 1st move an explain to Staios how disgruntled he is about losing. Sens are 2 points out of a playoff spot with games in hand on Philly (8th). 

    I'll sign on to just about any deal for Brady, but this one is not ripe yet.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    16 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    Yet, we all knew about Stone, Eichel, and M. Tkachuk. There really wasn't any denying it. That's why I think Brady will need to make the 1st move an explain to Staios how disgruntled he is about losing. Sens are 2 points out of a playoff spot with games in hand on Philly (8th). 

    I'll sign on to just about any deal for Brady, but this one is not ripe yet.

    It may just be hushed for others but there has to be something there

    ottawa GM choices

    (a) do nothing and get fired (b) make a splash and assure few more years

    either way billy can still probe and see if they bite 

    Two routes -

    1 - Billy got a nod from Kap that Rossi stays and he’ll sign the kid for 7-7 (yes this kind of talk exist using various channels)

    2 - Billy will trade Rossi (I think boeser, tuch, tkachuk are all in play) 

    3 - Rossi Wally multiple picks for Rantanen and even Mateo is happy 

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, OldDutchChip said:

    3 - Rossi Wally multiple picks for Rantanen and even Mateo is happy 

    You see 'Rado as sellers? I don't, especially since they just revamped their goalie position in 3 weeks. I think they'll be adding and Rantanen/MacKinnon are a duo to make a run. 

    However, I'd add Forsberg to that short list. We could use a guy like that.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    You see 'Rado as sellers? I don't, especially since they just revamped their goalie position in 3 weeks. I think they'll be adding and Rantanen/MacKinnon are a duo to make a run. 

    However, I'd add Forsberg to that short list. We could use a guy like that.

    I posted a couple days back that I’d poke on forsberg, so yes!!

    I dunno - I don’t think they want to pay Ranty 15 per, but I think if Rossi is dealt then we can pay him and Kap 

    14 Ranty 15 Kap

    but you know Forsberg might just be better suited for us 🧐 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 12/14/2024 at 11:32 AM, mnfaninnc said:

    Let's explore this a little further. Is it the mix of players or is it the youth?

    Claude Girioux and David Perron are the forwards supposed to be leading this group. Travis Homonic and Nick Jensen are supposed to be leading the defense. That's their veteran guys who are paid for their leadership and what they've done in the past.

    But, their core is:

    • Stutzle $8.35m  22
    • Tkachuk $8.2m  25
    • Norris $7.95m  25
    • Batherson $4.975m 26
    • Pinto $3.75m 24
    • Sanderson $8m 22
    • Chabot $8m 27
    • Zub $4.6m  29
    • Ullmark $8.25m  31

    These are the guys who are supposed to be getting it done. They are good, young, exciting, and lightly structured. It looks to me that their core is young and good, but their supporting cast is letting them down. 

    Their top 6 looks like they can compete with anyone. Their center depth looks very deep, in fact, they've got several playing wing. On defense, they appear to have some good puck moving defenders that can support the top 6. I would expect their PP to be top 10 with these guys. 

    As an organization, everything has settled down. New ownership is in town, new GM, new coach. Are we witnessing an acclimation period?

    I don't know much about Steve Staios, but Travis Green seems to be a front line coach. Staios came up through the ranks in Toronto, Edmonton, and most of his playing career was with Canadian teams. He's got a similar track record with a different organization to Bill Guerin when we hired him. Former player, a GM in major juniors (Guerin doesn't have that), and he spent some time under Ken Holland who would be a similar mentor like Jim Rutherford. 

    Everything I'm looking at looks solid, so why can't they win? The only thing I can put my finger on is that their defense is leaky. They are a lot better going forward than they are defending. 

    Based upon that, I would say that a young center in Rossi would likely be switched to wing, as they are deep down the middle. I wouldn't think they'd be too excited about that except he played his jr. hockey in the town and people remember the name. As for Buium, I'd think that would be the wrong pick up unless they see him as a 200' defender. But most of what we see from him is PP QB, putting up points on a dominant team, is he the defender that they need? I would think that both Brodin and Middleton would be more useful for them than Buium. I would think pairing Sanderson and Chabot with a stay at home defender would probably help everyone get better. 

    So, while they have plenty of guys who can put on a show, where I see the lacking is those shutdown guys like our 3rd/4th line (when healthy) and our left handed D pairs. Chisholm could be interesting because while he can skate the puck up, he is also learning structural defense. We do have a glut of defensive defenders, and 3 of those guys are adequate in the offensive side. Could they use a guy like Spurgeon? Absolutely! I still haven't figured out why Lassi Tomson hasn't made their team. Zub is on LTIR, and Perron is out (Zub looks like he may have broken his foot). 

    IMO, a jolt is what this team needs, and that jolt can be internal or external. If I were in Staios' shoes, I look at my cap and it's almost maxed. I look at my team and see that one weakness, and will be looking for a guy who can bring that defense on the 1st pair and shutdown opponents. Everywhere else, this team looks like it should be at minimum in the WC hunt. I'm thinking tweak, not blockbuster from their standpoint.

    image.jpeg.d04b8bc47ed277d13e0383e8de0f5c04.jpeg

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 12/14/2024 at 1:53 PM, OldDutchChip said:

    just like stone and eichel and M tkachuk - 25/26 - Brady may be on the move and Wild have the pieces

    Just so we are clear M Tkachuck made clear he wasn't going to resign when his contract expired and forced Calgary to sell him. Stone was also an unrestricted free agent that made clear he was going elsewhere. Buffalo pissed Eichel off after not letting him undergo surgery of his choice to fix his neck. He was not playing and refused the surgery Buffalo doctors recommended , so he was basically on permanent LTIR until this was resolved and requested a trade.

    B Tkachuk isn't a pending unrestricted free agent and is not in a dispute over an injury. He has no leverage to get out of Ottawa and they have made clear they aren't willing to even entertain trading him.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...