Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • Is Gaudreau's Long-Term Contract Is Starting To Make Sense?


    Image courtesy of Brett Holmes-Imagn Images
    Phillip Garrett

    Two months ago, if you asked me to guess who the top five-point scorers for the Minnesota Wild were, I would have likely been right about all but one. Kirill Kaprizov, Matt Boldy, Marco Rossi, and Mats Zuccarello are all shoo-ins. But then there’s Frederick Gaudreau, a third-line player who failed to prove himself in the first year of his five-year contract. 

    I have been skeptical of Freddy since he joined the Wild. My suspicion only worsened when he signed his new contract in 2023, especially since the team failed to show up for the playoffs a week later. 

    Gaudreau deserved a raise. After Dean Evason gave him more ice time with the Wild, he began to play at a higher level. Still, five years seemed too long. He had yet to prove he could produce at a high level for two seasons, let alone five. 

    My doubts increased after he scored only 15 points (5 goals, 10 assists) last year, the fewest he has scored in a Minnesota sweater. 

    In his defense, Gaudreau played only 67 regular-season games, contributing to the long list of injuries Minnesota suffered last year. With so many players out, the Wild needed a depth scorer from a forward with the flexibility to move up and down a roster. Gaudreau could have filled that role but failed to step up. 

    Entering this season, Gaudreau needed to prove himself. Gaudreau has 13 points (4 goals, 9 assists) in 24 games, averaging 14 minutes of ice time. He’s been a productive player. Still, with only one assist in his last five games, he isn’t playing like a player who’s earned a long-term contract. 

    So, what about the other middle six forwards? How does he compare in value? Gaudreau’s 5-year deal, though long, only costs $2.1 million against the cap per year. Meanwhile, Joel Eriksson Ek has the same number of points but more than double the cap hit at $5.2 million. However, Eriksson Ek brings more to the table than points and has earned every penny.

    Conversely, Ryan Hartman signed a 3-year, $12 million. Hartman is 13th in scoring for the Wild, with only four goals and three assists. Still, he has a $4 million cap hit. Hartman is taking twice as much money, scoring less than Jonas Brodin and Spurgeon, and has a propensity to get injured. 

    I like Hartman, but his contract highlights how big of a steal Gaudreau’s contract may have been for the team. If Gaudreau can find a way to continue his scoring and not let age slow him down, the Wild may have themselves a second-line centerman for half the cost. But how likely is that to happen?

    For lines that have played more than 60 minutes, the Marcus Foligno-Gaudreau-Yakov Trenin trio has the lowest xGoals% of all Wild forwards at 52.5%. They also have the lowest xGoals for per 60 minutes at 1.94. 

    The numbers show that this line should be struggling offensively. Yet, they still have found ways to score, having notched six goals and averaging 3.63 goals per 60 minutes. 

    Returning to the Foligno-Gaudreau-Trenin line, they have the second-lowest goals against per 60 at 1.21, only below Boldy-Erikkson Ek-Kaprizov. Better yet? That line has also only let in 2 goals while on the ice. 

    The Foligno-Gaudreau-Trenin line has found its footing because Trenin has started to look more like the player the Wild signed to a 4-year, $12 million contract.

    Gaudreau brings a fun level of finesse to an otherwise physically imposing line that also takes a team-first approach. Hynes also knows this. He’s using Gaudreau and his line to shut down the most prominent lines in the league, and it’s working – the Wild have found ways to win close games. 

    Minnesota’s defense has made them special. While that starts on the blue line, players like Gaudreau quietly shut down dynamic lines. He’s a glue guy, which is valuable to every team. 

    Gaudreau still has to prove that he can continue to play at an elevated level for three more years after this and do it separately from Foligno and Trenin. Right now, he’s an essential part of a dominant team. Gaudreau will likely continue to have a role if the Wild can continue to be oppressive defensively. 

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 2

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    49 minutes ago, Will D. Ness said:

    It's the Yagafo line!

    Freddy deserves some applause especially since we ragged on him so much last season.

    The Wild had a few guys underperforming while they played hurt much of last year(Faber & Middleton among them), and nobody more than Gaudreau.

    YaGaFo doesn't roll off the tongue too smoothly for me.

    I might go with FolGaTr. Not half gator, FolGaTr, and it will attack!

     

    • Haha 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    You might need to edit that title, either to the declarative "Gaudreau's Long Term Contract Is Starting to Make Sense" or the question, "Is Gaudreau's Long Term Contract Starting to Make Sense?"  One too many Is's.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    And yes, Gaudreau has been one of the many surprises this year.  In terms of bounce backs or upgrades in form, I think it goes Gus > Middleton > Kaprizov > Rossi > Gaudreau > Johansson.  Most players are pretty much what they always have been.  Hartman and Ek might be slipping a bit, but otherwise doing things that matter off the scoresheet.  

    In Gaudreau's case, he's returned to being a steady defensive presence with a streaky offensive side.  I'd say he's Hartman, but with better defensive instincts and less offense (usually).  But he's ben on his game and part of the reason the team is so lock tight defensively.  They aren't beating everyone (Kings...grr), but mostly playing against any competition without too much trouble or beating them outright.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Gaudreau is fine as he is.  He is solid defensive player.  Has good hockey sense and makes few mistakes.  I he one of the best players in the history of the game?  No but he is solid and worthy of his position.  There is and was no option to replace him with someone better and cheaper.  So Freddy is perfectly fine where he is.  

    If some of the prospects show that they are better than he is then we can have that discussion.  Right now we know Freddy will be on the PK and on the 3rd or 4th line and we don't need to worry about that position. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 hours ago, Citizen Strife said:

    You might need to edit that title, either to the declarative "Gaudreau's Long Term Contract Is Starting to Make Sense" or the question, "Is Gaudreau's Long Term Contract Starting to Make Sense?"  One too many Is's.

    Or…Is ‘Gaudreau's Long-Term Contract Is Starting To Make Sense’ a correct headline? The is’s have it…is I right, or what?

    Edited by Oliver It
    Clarity
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I don't think anybody should be surprised that FreddyG has returned to form from last season.

    After the season last year, SillyG listed out all the players who were injured or playing hurt and Freddy was one of them.

    I can probably pinpoint the exact moment when Freddy's play turned down last season:

    I'll repeat the same argument I had last season. His salary is $2.1M/yr, he's a NHL level player who's making barely above league min.  Should it come down to it, and he didnt get picked up off waivers, you can bury $1.125M of that in the minors, so you'd only be looking at about $1M in dead cap should things go incredibly south with him.  Even when he wasn't producing offsensively last season, he looked a lot better than the majority of the league-min callups we rotated through.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    56 minutes ago, MrCheatachu said:

    I don't think anybody should be surprised that FreddyG has returned to form from last season.

    After the season last year, SillyG listed out all the players who were injured or playing hurt and Freddy was one of them.

    I can probably pinpoint the exact moment when Freddy's play turned down last season:

    I'll repeat the same argument I had last season. His salary is $2.1M/yr, he's a NHL level player who's making barely above league min.  Should it come down to it, and he didnt get picked up off waivers, you can bury $1.125M of that in the minors, so you'd only be looking at about $1M in dead cap should things go incredibly south with him.  Even when he wasn't producing offsensively last season, he looked a lot better than the majority of the league-min callups we rotated through.

    Great argument and you nailed it.

    This season's version of Fred G. makes that contract look smart.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I still believe that with Gaudreau's shootout prowess, he was given an extra $500k on the contract. That makes it look even better. The past 2 seasons we haven't gone to many shootouts, but you still have to plan a lineup accordingly. At the time the contract was signed, Freddy was money in the 3 slot, a position that was filled with someone who had ice water running through their veins.

    Last season, he missed a few shootouts due to injury and then we just never really got that far. He didn't perform all that well which made it seem like there were still lingering affects from the injury above. 

    We've had a couple this year. The 1st one, Freddy wasn't 1 of the top 3 which surprised me. The next one, Freddy went 1st with Kaprizov and Zuccarello out. He was money. Essentially, he's the type of guy who scores at a good rate on this, and can do it from the 3 slot, a guy like that is kind of hard to find. He banked points for the team 2 years ago doing it. He may still do so this season. Those points matter. 

    I did not like Boldy's shootout, it seems like he was indecisive on his way in and it flubbed. That's something he should be working on in practice, a lot, especially with a 3rd goalie up right now. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...