Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness
  • How Much Would Winning the Draft Lottery Change the Wild's Outlook?


    Image courtesy of Christopher Hanewinckel-USA TODAY Sports
    Tony Abbott

    The theme for the Minnesota Wild since their inception has been being stuck in the middle of the NHL standings. They've flirted with being one of the top teams in the league some years, and in others, they've stumbled. This is reflected in their historic draft slots. Since winning a coin flip gave them the No. 3 overall pick (used on Marian Gaborik) as an expansion team, the Wild have never been slotted higher than fourth or lower than 24th in the draft order.

    So it would truly be the most Minnesota Wild thing ever for this to be the year the NHL Draft Lottery breaks in their favor. They have a 2.0% (one-in-50) chance to have their name called tonight, which would move them all the way up... to third overall in the draft.

    You can thank the New York Rangers for this. Or rather, all the general managers who cried to the NHL after one of the league's marquee franchises won Draft Lotteries in 2019 to select Kaapo Kakko at No. 2 overall and in 2020 to land the No. 1 overall pick and Alexis Lafreniere. After this, the NHL changed its draft lottery rules, with one stipulation being a team could only move up a maximum of 10 slots in the draft via a lottery win.

    So, there you go, the Wild are eliminated from the Macklin Celebrini Sweepstakes because Pierre Dorion (or some other probably-fired-by-now GM) had to settle for picking Tim Stützle over Lafreniere in 2020. As the ad campaign goes, not weird. Wild.

    Does this mean a lottery win will turn into ashes in the mouths of the State of Hockey? Could it drastically improve the position of their franchise for years to come? Or should Wild fans be more than content with sticking at No. 13 overall? Let's take a look.

    This won't come as a shock to anyone, but picking No. 3 should have a higher return on investment than Pick 13. But how much of a game-changer has that gap been in practice? Fortunately, we can stack up the career Wins Above Replacement for the No. 3 versus the No. 13 pick in each draft since 2007, so we're gonna do that now. 

    2007: Kyle Turris (No. 3), 5.4 WAR vs. Lars Eller (No. 13), 9.1 WAR
    2008: Zach Bogosian (No. 3), -1.2 WAR vs. Colten Teubert (No. 13), -0.5 WAR
    2009: Matt Duchene (No. 3), 27.7 WAR vs. Matt Kassian (No. 13), 0.3 WAR
    2010: Erik Gudbranson (No. 3), -5.3 WAR vs. Brandon Gormley (No. 13), 0.7 WAR
    2011: Jonathan Huberdeau (No. 3), 20.5 WAR vs. Sven Baertschi (No. 13), 4.6 WAR
    2012: Alex Galchenyuk (No. 3), 2.8 WAR vs. Radek Faksa (No. 13), 2.1 WAR
    2013: Jonathan Drouin (No. 3), 3.0 WAR vs. Josh Morrissey (No. 13), 10.2 WAR
    2014: Leon Draisaitl (No. 3), 24.3 WAR vs. Jakub Vrana (No. 13), 5.0 WAR
    2015: Dylan Strome (No. 3), 8.3 WAR vs. Jakub Zboril (No. 13), -0.4 WAR
    2016: Pierre-Luc Dubois (No. 3), 11.1 WAR vs. Jake Bean (No. 13), -0.5 WAR
    2017: Miro Heiskanen (No. 3), 10.7 WAR vs. Nick Suzuki (No. 13), 7.6 WAR
    2018: Jesperi Kotkaniemi (No. 3), 1.9 WAR vs. Ty Dellandrea (No. 13), 1.8 WAR

    Of these 12 drafts, the team that picked No. 3 overall got more value from their pick eight times, with No. 13 getting the edge four times. But perhaps it's more useful to look at a more nuanced breakdown. From the No. 3 team's perspective, I'd classify these as being:

    • Four Huge Wins (Duchene, Huberdeau, Draisaitl, Dubois)
    • Two Moderate Wins (Strome, Heiskanen)
    • Two Relative Washes (Galchenyuk, Kotkaniemi)
    • Two Losses (Turris, Drouin)
    • Two Where Everyone Loses (Bogosian, Gudbranson)

    There are some nice players in that No. 13 group. Getting a Suzuki, Morrissey, or Vrana out of the draft would no doubt help the Wild. But that one-in-three or so shot of hitting a home run is the big difference-maker here, and that's what Minnesota would be getting. It's still a lottery ticket, sure, but it's a way better one.

    Of course, not all drafts are created equal. Sometimes Draisaitl is sitting there for the taking at pick 3. Sometimes it's Galchenyuk. Which caliber of player are the Wild looking at between No. 3 and No. 13?

    TSN's Bob McKenzie posted his Draft Rankings for the lottery portion of the 2024 Draft on Monday. McKenzie's rankings serve as a consensus draft board not for public-facing scouts but for his many contacts within the industry. As such, they tend to be the most predictive of where a player will go in the draft.

    The caveat here is that McKenzie believes this year will be unpredictable. "I've been doing draft rankings for more than 35 years, and I don't recall a year where the Top 10 is such a hodgepodge of opinion," he writes. But let's give him some well-earned trust and look at the Nos. 3-5 and 13-15 players in his rankings, and examine deeper.

    No. 3 Options
    Anton Silayev, Left Defenseman
    Artyom Levshunov, Right Defenseman
    Cayden Lindstrom, Center

    These are the likely home run candidates Minnesota could target at No. 3 -- unless (another) Russian superstar in consensus No. 2 pick Ivan Demidov falls. One common thread these players have in common: They're all big boys. If the Wild want to go for size in this slot, they'll be able to while arguably still taking the best player available.

    Silayev is 6-foot-7 and playing in the KHL right now. His three goals and 11 points in 63 games might not seem impressive, but as a 17-year-old defenseman in the KHL, it's basically unheard of. Levshunov is a Belarusian-born defenseman playing for Michigan State, and it's safe to say he's adjusted to North American hockey. He scored nine goals and 35 points in 38 games as a freshman. Then there's Cayden Lindstrom, whom our own Kalisha Turnipseed profiled in detail last week

    Corey Pronman's draft rankings are, by design, very conservative on player comparisons. So it's pretty significant that Pronman compares Silayev, Levshunov, and Lindstrom to Zdeno Chara (though that's partly due to the lack of defensemen that size), Noah Dobson, and Chris Kreider, respectively. Chara is Chara, a (for now) singular talent in NHL history and Hall of Famer. Dobson is quietly one of the best defensemen in the league. Kreider has scored 39, 36, and 52 goals in his last three seasons.

    Now let's look at...

    No. 13 Options
    Cole Eiserman, Left Wing
    Beckett Sennecke, Right Wing
    Trevor Connelly, Left Wing

    The theme of this being the year of Bill Guerin's Big Boy Draft continues throughout the top-15. These Big Boys aren't quite as big at this point of the rankings, but 12 of McKenzie's top-15 players are 6-foot-0 or taller, making them Official Big Boys. These three players are no exception.

    But let's look past the height chart and into these players. Eiserman was once thought to be the No. 2 player in this class but has seen his stock fall over the season. This is despite him scoring a goal per game at each level of the U.S. Development Program teams he played on this year. He just scored nine goals in seven games at the Under-18 World Junior Championships. If he hits, he's a star. If not, per Pronman, he's more of an Owen Tippett-type.

    Sennecke's scouting reports read like he's got the Matt Boldy toolkit. He loves to carry the puck, and his ability to pass and shoot, combined with his 6-foot-2 frame, intrigues. Connelly skates well and is a very gifted, smart passer, though there are some real "Big Yikes" incidents in his past that might lead a team like the Wild, who put a lot of stock in character, to pass.

    But overall, the potential bump from No. 3 to No. 13 might not be as big as we'd expect. If we average out Hockey Prospecting's Star and NHLer probabilities for Silayev, Levshunov, and Lindstrom, these No. 3 pick candidates have an average of a 41% chance of getting a star and a 64% chance of becoming an NHLer. That's pretty good.

    Still, if we throw Eiserman, Sennecke, and Connelly into that same blender, the average probabilities come out as... a 37% chance of stardom and a 59% chance of landing an NHL player. 

    If almost sure-fire stars in Celebrini or Demidov were on the line for the Wild, things would be different. It would be worth watching the Draft Lottery through their endless commercials for that one-in-50 chance that the Wild's fortunes would change forever. That's not the world we occupy, though. It would still be exciting if Minnesota lands that No. 3 overall pick and gets their exact choice of these top prospects. But as for whether you need to watch the Draft Lottery or not? Meh. You don't need to be glued to your screen, you'll find out soon enough.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 4

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    "It is mind-boggling that people put Ek, Boldi, Rossi and Faber in the same class as Kaprizov."

     

    I didn't say that.  I said Ek, Boldy, and Faber were top line quality players.  Namely Ek, a person routinely touted as some weird "eh, he's a 2C or elite whatever something or other" so I put some numbers to back that up that his 30 goals were good enough to put him in a Top 25 discussion for center scoring.

    My point was the Wild aren't lacking for talent, even some mythical top end can't miss player.  They HAVE that guy.  They just need more of the level of Ek, Boldy (or even Rossi and Faber right now) to get more secondary scoring.  They can get that sort of guy where they are at in the draft.  Trade a piece like Gus and 13, maybe someone goes for it.  But you don't need to be blowing up a team's immediate infrastructure for a slightly better ping pong ball.  It's worth seeing what future pieces they do have add to the equation before blowing it all up again.

    Never did I say anything about saying he's at Kaprizov's point totals or any such thing.  Kaprizov was 10-15 in the entire league.  That isn't what I said, so please don't misconstrue things. 

    Edited by Citizen Strife
    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Do note: blowing up a team's future for the here and now that isn't there to try and make the owner happy was what the FORMER GM would try to do.  At least Guerin kept his aces up his sleeve.  For every Stramel, there's a Kumpulainen or Heidt coming in the same draft, so extra ammunition.  

    Or, we could just get Martin Hanzal or Matt Moulson again.  Those trades sure were something.  That stuff probably set the Wild back way worse than anything Guerin is or isn't doing now.

    • Like 1
    • Haha 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 hours ago, Citizen Strife said:

    "It is mind-boggling that people put Ek, Boldi, Rossi and Faber in the same class as Kaprizov."

     

    I didn't say that.  I said Ek, Boldy, and Faber were top line quality players.  Namely Ek, a person routinely touted as some weird "eh, he's a 2C or elite whatever something or other" so I put some numbers to back that up that his 30 goals were good enough to put him in a Top 25 discussion for center scoring.

    My point was the Wild aren't lacking for talent, even some mythical top end can't miss player.  They HAVE that guy.  They just need more of the level of Ek, Boldy (or even Rossi and Faber right now) to get more secondary scoring.  They can get that sort of guy where they are at in the draft.  Trade a piece like Gus and 13, maybe someone goes for it.  But you don't need to be blowing up a team's immediate infrastructure for a slightly better ping pong ball.  It's worth seeing what future pieces they do have add to the equation before blowing it all up again.

    Never did I say anything about saying he's at Kaprizov's point totals or any such thing.  Kaprizov was 10-15 in the entire league.  That isn't what I said, so please don't misconstrue things. 

    When you say that Kaprizov is 10-15 in the entire league - that speaks for itself. You devalue your best player! Then  you assert that the status quo is acceptable, and we are on the right trajectory, which is completely false. We are approaching a cliff.

    You need to prioritize your top player the best you can. Not to say - hey Kap "you know you had these guys you helped achieve career highs? remember hartman - (yeah he was always a scoring machine!) HA what about zuccy?  - (yeah he consistently put up a pt per game before he came to the Wild), now be content with what we have, we'll give you the money (cause you know you obviously care ONLY about the money will get more here and there is no such think as advertisement or "enough money" or even legacy money that he already may have, but no just buy our "vision" and in few years (a) our can't miss prospects will be ready (b) rossi will grow and become your Rantanen and NOT Mietinen and (c) those russian prospects will come in and be your best friends and be as good as you!"

    yeah we have nothing to worry about. It's not like 29 other teams are not game planning FOR you and know that you alone are the team, and definitely not be in line ALL of them should you become available next year! No No No we got this. We have EK Boldy Rossi Faber We will also sign a MN son to replace you! Over the hill? no no - ripe and ready to contribute to the "winning way" and get us to that first round entry (one and done sure, but that's better than nothing??) You go on, leave the 18,000 fans, you won't find them where you end up oh no

    Not weird, Wild. 

    I am really not trying to direct this to your specific comment but overall it is such a lazy strategy. I am hoping the GM has a better and more inventive plan forward. There needs to be a clear message sent to Kaprizov that he is the leader and a team needs to take shape that maximizes his potential, and IF a there is a way to do it and it requires letting go and taking a risk - you have to consider. Not making an impulsive decision, but instead think multiple steps forward. I just have little confidence that our GM has that. He thus far played only checkers and failed to even attempt to learn chess.

    Finally the fans need to realize that generational talents like Kaprizov do NOT come around every other year. If you think we'll be fine without Kaprizov and instead pivot to Faber led team ..... yikes i really hope this is not the same believe that is shared by GM. 

    Edited by OldDutchChip
    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    17 hours ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    Connelly is listed at 6'1 and 161 pounds.

    You're right, I wouldn't. Let's just say he wouldn't be ready next season to make the jump. Why only 161? Likely his growth spurt was later and he hasn't begun to fill out yet. This is pretty typical of 17 year olds. But, he's got like 44 lbs. of muscle to put on! And, in this scenario, that's a bit more than 20% of his current weight.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 hours ago, Citizen Strife said:

    2nd line guys in the 40s-50s, and the less said about lines 3-4 the better.  

    2nd line guys should get at least that, but Johansson only made it to 30. 🙄

    Nearly 16 minutes per night and only missed 4 games. With the guys he's playing with, NoJo should have reached 50+, so imagine what Yurov replacing him could do for the Wild in the standings for 25-26.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 hours ago, Citizen Strife said:

    Namely Ek, a person routinely touted as some weird "eh, he's a 2C or elite whatever something or other" so I put some numbers to back that up that his 30 goals were good enough to put him in a Top 25 discussion for center scoring.

    When determining the 1C/2C argument, I can see that Ek had the points to be considered low end 1C. However, wouldn't you also throw in a net goals, or at least net Xgoals in that same argument? Ek's value isn't just putting up points in that position, his value is putting up enough points and negating goals going the other way allowing Kaprizov and the other wing a little more room to be offensive. 

    So, in an argument like this, Ek would be more compared to a Toews in his prime, or a Kopitar or Bergeron. He's not a McDavid, but has a pretty good track record of defending him. 

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The main thing at play is Guerin had to do the buyouts, because it tied directly to saving money for Kaprizov's contract, plus the decision on Fiala v. Boldy (because they couldn't really have both at the moment).  I understand wanting to chase some rings every year, but regardless of what the team does, and who the team brings in, they are going to be $15m shorter than everyone else.

    Yes, package the Nojos, Gaudreaus, etc...but the team couldn't win in 20-21 with Fiala AND everyone else breaking every record.  There's a lot that comes down to luck.  All the points or best defenseman in the world can't account for injuries, someone slipping on a banana peel, someone disappearing, etc.  Again, I'm not saying Guerin has done some industry wide sea change.  Who knows what he has to do to keep Leipold off his ass.  But saying Kaprizov is going to get a cup just because he leaves and goes elsewhere isn't always accurate.  Fiala left and didn't exactly win anything either, now did he?  Toronto and Edmonton have had the best players in the league for years.  Hasn't done them much good either...yet.

    I'm all for keeping Kaprizov happy, but you can win a ring in like year 1, year 2, year 3, or you can wait a full decade to get one.  Saying the Wild are up shit creek because 1-2 bad years isn't always accurate.  For all we know, the Wild make the playoffs next year and beat the piss off Dallas or Colorado.  Not likely, but if Seattle can beat a crippled Colorado team, who knows.

    I'm not the GM.  I just know saying Kaprizov is just ready to piss off to another team whether or not we drafted a Lindstrom or Silayev over a Jirichek or Greentree isn't likely.  There are lots of teams that haven't exactly been winners either.

    It's almost as if winning a Stanley Cup is fucking hard.  Maybe I just have too much relentless realistic optimism.

    Edited by Citizen Strife
    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 hours ago, MrCheatachu said:

    So yes, you can state that Bogosian is a better player than Teubert, and if you try to hide behind WAR you're just demonstrating the perils of blindly depending on statistics without thinking about what you are doing.

    This is a hands down spike win for Bogosian. It doesn't take WAR to figure out who was the better player. Simply looking at the games played dictates who was the better player by a mile! There is no argument to even suggest that Teubert is at least as good. Bogosians looking at a silver stick in a couple of years. Teubert is selling shoes at footlocker.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    15 hours ago, Dean said:

    I’m with old Dutch. Billy needs to do some big game hunting at the draft.  Kappy has one foot out the door .  Just think about that . Your franchise player doesn’t believe in the team.  How does that translate into a good culture in the room. The guy everyone looks to , to do everything for them doesn’t believe in what he’s doing .  It’s going to permeate the season all year .  That’s not a healthy culture. 

    Maybe I have missed something so please fill me in. Where are we hearing that Kap has one foot out the door already and doesn't believe in the team?  If that is the case and you want to talk about culture in a locker room they better ship him immediately because that is a horrible mentality to have, just biding your time until you can leave.

    If that was his mentality why wouldn't he also just skate and play half assed at the end of the year?  I have a hard time believing he has one foot out the door but will bust ass shift after shift at the end of a lost year.

    Please fill me in where the "one foot out the door" narrative is coming from.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 minutes ago, IllicitFive said:

    Maybe I have missed something so please fill me in. Where are we hearing that Kap has one foot out the door already and doesn't believe in the team?  If that is the case and you want to talk about culture in a locker room they better ship him immediately because that is a horrible mentality to have, just biding your time until you can leave.

    The rumor is as shaky as the one where Tkachuk is going to demand being traded because he's sick of losing. Kaprizov merely said he's going to wait to sign an extension. Suddenly to some, the sky is falling, alarm bells went off, and typical Minnesota optimism kicked in.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 minutes ago, IllicitFive said:

    Please fill me in where the "one foot out the door" narrative is coming from.

    Media playing the tune for the fatalistic fan.

    • Haha 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, mnfaninnc said:

    The rumor is as shaky as the one where Tkachuk is going to demand being traded because he's sick of losing. Kaprizov merely said he's going to wait to sign an extension. Suddenly to some, the sky is falling, alarm bells went off, and typical Minnesota optimism kicked in.

    Haha, sounds good, that was my assumption but you know, no longer omniscient, so figured double check.  To all fellow MN sports fans, lets take a collective deep breath. My first true deep dive into fandom was Vikes 98, and was so calmly told by my father when I was 9 as soon as wide left hit "Welcome to Minnesota sports, but there will be years like 87 and 91 with the twins too". Been a passionate, but not insane, fan since of most things MN sports.

    Maybe if Kap has that "killer mentality" we all hope for, he wants to be the one who finally brings a cup in, cement a legacy and be THAT GUY. Rational has to be used too, 15 mil in the hole to start doesn't help a roster. Young guys are still being seasoned and learning, which takes years in hockey. Breath, patience, trust the process. If it fails, well, reboot and try again. That's what is fun about sports, the idea that hope springs eternal. While yes we must build a team to compete and Kap is a center piece, it takes time. Once more together everyone, in through the nose, out through the mouth. Enjoy the ride.

    • Thanks 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 hours ago, MrCheatachu said:

    Did he take a dump in your cereal?  Did he microwave leftover tuna in the breakroom?  How did Bogosian hurt you?

    1. You don't think Teubert is better or worse? You cant figure out if a guy who's played 24 NHL games (also a defender with 12:39 atoi and a career -5 through 24 games) is a better or worse player than Bogo? 
    2. In your 'dead cat bounce article' you posted the SPAR table through his career which clearly shows that while he hasnt been consistent, he hasn't hurt his team at every place he's gone.

     image.png.d74ba1ca5660383c73aef1a7dc82d165.png

    By the way, that's through 16,821 minutes on ice.  There's absolutely no way you can compare that to Teubert's 306 minutes on ice.

    So yes, you can state that Bogosian is a better player than Teubert, and if you try to hide behind WAR you're just demonstrating the perils of blindly depending on statistics without thinking about what you are doing.

     

    OK, so he's better than a guy who played 306 minutes. Congrats?

    I'd still put it in the category of "Everyone Loses." 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, OldDutchChip said:

    When you say that Kaprizov is 10-15 in the entire league - that speaks for itself. You devalue your best player! Then  you assert that the status quo is acceptable, and we are on the right trajectory, which is completely false. We are approaching a cliff.

    What cliff? The one where we retain future assets? Draft capitol? Try to build longevity instead of a one year possibility then collapse with nothing in the pipe?

    Lots of you don't like current projection of team but what would you like? To get you gotta give so what you wanna give and what are you hoping to get? Please not some trade Shaw for Rantanen type thing, lets keep it realistic and plausible. Other teams don't want to give up stuff either unless they get equal back.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    41 minutes ago, IllicitFive said:

    What cliff? The one where we retain future assets? Draft capitol? Try to build longevity instead of a one year possibility then collapse with nothing in the pipe?

    Lots of you don't like current projection of team but what would you like? To get you gotta give so what you wanna give and what are you hoping to get? Please not some trade Shaw for Rantanen type thing, lets keep it realistic and plausible. Other teams don't want to give up stuff either unless they get equal back.

    The cliff is where Wild will be should they instead of Kaprizov prioritize those future assets you mention or any other player other than Kap.

    Draft capital? That number 13 pick? or the 1st from last year? Which draft gem do we have that will replace Kaprizov? The dream that Yurov will be his clone? Rossi? Boldy? 18 year old Heidt that is breaking scoring records just like Beckman did? 

    I would like the team to ensure that they best player (a TOP 5 player in this league) is their top priority. Period. To do that you have to instruct a C on his chest - you do it. To do that you have to trade favorites and/or desirable assets and prospects - you do it. You are in a bad situation with cap, so you need to really plan it out to perfection. It starts NOW, not next year but now. 

    So yes, he leaves and Wild become worse off that Coyotes, worse off that Sens, worse off that ANY team out there. Might as well move the team and wait out for another expansion. Very pessimistic outlook for me on what's going to happen with Wild. 

    Edited by OldDutchChip
    • Confused 1
    • Sad 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 minutes ago, OldDutchChip said:

    The cliff is where Wild will be should they instead of Kaprizov prioritize those future assets you mention or any other player other than Kap.

    Draft capital? That number 13 pick? or the 1st from last year? Which draft gem do we have that will replace Kaprizov? The dream that Yurov will be his clone? Rossi? Boldy? 18 year old Heidt that is breaking scoring records just like Beckman did? 

    I would like the team to ensure that they best player (a TOP 5 player in this league) is their top priority. Period. To do that you have to instruct a C on his chest - you do it. To do that you have to trade favorites and/or desirable assets and prospects - you do it. You are in a bad situation with cap, so you need to really plan it out to perfection. It starts NOW, not next year but now. 

    So yes, he leaves and Wild become worse off that Coyotes, worse off that Sens, worse off that ANY team out there. Might as well move the team and wait out for another expansion. Very pessimistic outlook for me on what's going to happen with Wild. 

    So Kap the captain/gm/owner?

    I get that he is important but seems agreed top 5 ish player in the league. I would argue the pieces are more important than the one. Otherwise Austin Matthews, McDavid should be having parades every year. You know what those two teams are lacking? Stonger depth, or defense, or goalie.  I do not believe players should dictate the moves made, input sure, but run things? No chance.

    With the cap, yes a plan is indeed needed. Like one where you get cap penalty back, contracts and older players start falling off and younger guys on entry level contracts free up maximum cap space to go out and snag high end free agents?  I tend to trust the guy who has the job to know what they are doing. I mean there are currently only 32 guys who have the job and maybe a handful more that can do it? Not even well, just do it.

    I feel bad for the "worse off than the coyotes and sens, worse than ANY team". I mean they were basically folding 7 years ago right? Going to move?  The team isn't going anywhere, at worst hit reset and rebuild. At best, parades.  Devastating if Kap leaves? Absolutely. Franchise ending, not even close. I hope you can join me on the hopes and dreams wagon, its not so bad, we have room.

    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, Tony Abbott said:

    OK, so he's better than a guy who played 306 minutes. Congrats?

    I'd still put it in the category of "Everyone Loses." 

    You were the one who doubled down on not being able to determine if Teubert or Bogosian was the better player...yet you seem determined to use the WAR statistic to dunk on Bogosian, again. 

    I mean, there are a number of ways that you could show the value of draft picks.  We've seen plots on aggregated number of NHL games vs. Draft Position, for example Dobber prospects is a good indication the higher you move up in the first round, the more likely you're going to hit on a career NHL player.  Basically, the likelihood of getting a guy like Bogosian (842 games) compared to Teubert (24 games):

    image.png.23d2fdc53109425a18b8bcda9baa4444.png

    Or Hockey Graphs has an aggregated points/draft position:

    image.png.aacce8a98e548411753eb260b0e29ff5.png

    But neither of those would allow you to clearly take pot shots at Bogosian.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    You're conflating Bogosian having a good career from a personal standpoint with him bringing value to teams. I don't necessarily think "sticking around" is a virtue, but it's enabled Bogosian to have a nice career. His teams have rarely been better for it -- and you don't need WAR to tell you that.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    The rumor is as shaky as the one where Tkachuk is going to demand being traded because he's sick of losing. Kaprizov merely said he's going to wait to sign an extension. Suddenly to some, the sky is falling, alarm bells went off, and typical Minnesota optimism kicked in.

    There is no optimism because our GM is as stubborn as a mule. Our best player is undervalued by the fans. And people think - money is what each athlete chooses over other things. There is a reason why he signed 5 years. At year 3 he is further away from reaching THE GOAL then when he got here. In fact, i'd argue that we are in the worse situation given the state of unknown for how things will play out outside of Kap. The draft picks are not really playing out of their minds. Goal tending is horrible. Prospects have yet to really show anything. Yurov may or may not be great. Who knows - maybe he will be the next Pavel Bure or the next Valeriy Bure. Thats a big difference right? Kap has a family, a goal in mind, a future to look forward to. The odds are definitely against us in retaining if we don't do something big. That's just it. 

    Edited by OldDutchChip
    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, IllicitFive said:

    So Kap the captain/gm/owner?

    I get that he is important but seems agreed top 5 ish player in the league. I would argue the pieces are more important than the one. Otherwise Austin Matthews, McDavid should be having parades every year. You know what those two teams are lacking? Stonger depth, or defense, or goalie.  I do not believe players should dictate the moves made, input sure, but run things? No chance.

    With the cap, yes a plan is indeed needed. Like one where you get cap penalty back, contracts and older players start falling off and younger guys on entry level contracts free up maximum cap space to go out and snag high end free agents?  I tend to trust the guy who has the job to know what they are doing. I mean there are currently only 32 guys who have the job and maybe a handful more that can do it? Not even well, just do it.

    I feel bad for the "worse off than the coyotes and sens, worse than ANY team". I mean they were basically folding 7 years ago right? Going to move?  The team isn't going anywhere, at worst hit reset and rebuild. At best, parades.  Devastating if Kap leaves? Absolutely. Franchise ending, not even close. I hope you can join me on the hopes and dreams wagon, its not so bad, we have room.

    Kaprizov should get Captaincy. It should have happened already. Which tells me it won't. And even if Spurge is traded, his C will go to Ek. whyyyyyy??? Welll because GM will say he deserves it, he is the heart and soul of the team. Well Ek is also on a contract with the team and will likely stay as long as we want him here. He leads fine with an A on his jersey. So be smart - give this role to Kap. This bind him to this team, make a connection that will mean something to him when the following year rolls around. He is not just a side character, but a main actor.....Side tracking here, back to your comment - 

    Re your point about him being a GM/Owner - look the GM needs to optimize his team around an identity. We are blessed with an amazingly talented player that the franchise NEVER had. It makes sense from both success and business stand point. 

    Granted the franchise will still be here and people will still watch, it is just a sad time that awaits us then. 🍻

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, Protec said:

    Old Dutch - What you got in the avatar? Kasparitis Evil Twin? 

    You know it! 🍻 haha actually i think its Darius himself!

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, OldDutchChip said:

    Kaprizov should get Captaincy. It should have happened already. Which tells me it won't. And even if Spurge is traded, his C will go to Ek. whyyyyyy??? Welll because GM will say he deserves it, he is the heart and soul of the team. Well Ek is also on a contract with the team and will likely stay as long as we want him here. He leads fine with an A on his jersey. So be smart - give this role to Kap.

    You do know they gave the letter to Kaprizov over JEE last year, do you not?

    If Spurgeon were gone, it's extremely likely they would give Kaprizov the option.

    Also think it's possible you missed the conversation about why he signed a 5 year deal originally. It was due to cap constraints, and it will allow him to sign a larger deal with the Wild sooner. There are about zero reasons to believe Kaprizov is heading out the door, other than those conjured up by anxious fans.

    The Wild are building towards 25-26, and will look to sign him to an extension prior to that season after they figure out what other players they can bring in to help the team contend.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 minutes ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    You do know they gave the letter to Kaprizov over JEE last year, do you not?

    If Spurgeon were gone, it's extremely likely they would give Kaprizov the option.

    Also think it's possible you missed the conversation about why he signed a 5 year deal originally. It was due to cap constraints, and it will allow him to sign a larger deal with the Wild sooner. There are about zero reasons to believe Kaprizov is heading out the door, other than those conjured up by anxious fans.

    The Wild are building towards 25-26, and will look to sign him to an extension prior to that season after they figure out what other players they can bring in to help the team contend.

    i am saying he should be captain no matter if Spurge is here or not. 

    "Also think it's possible you missed the conversation about why he signed a 5 year deal originally. It was due to cap constraints, and it will allow him to sign a larger deal with the Wild sooner." 

    i missed that, please elaborate on this if you can.

    i think he was very firm that he wasn't "feeling" the 8 year term in MN and pushed for 5 years. we were planning to offer 8 and then agreed on 5 (he actually wanted less than 5)

    Its all moot as we have no idea what he is thinking and planning. but thinking that he will come in and sign just because you offer him the money is a bit naive in my opinion.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    20 minutes ago, OldDutchChip said:

    i think he was very firm that he wasn't "feeling" the 8 year term in MN and pushed for 5 years. we were planning to offer 8 and then agreed on 5 (he actually wanted less than 5)

    Yeah, his agent didn't want 8 years at a $9M figure and the Wild couldn't really exceed a $9M figure. With the cap expected to go up, each added year would need to be around $12M+, which would have driven up the average cap number a lot.

    Guerin knew he had to get 5 years to get beyond the cap hell, so that was the minimum he was willing to go. No question that both want to be with a contender, and it's Guerin's job to make sure that is the Wild. If Guerin had not gotten that 5th year, and added quality young talent along the way, there would be more concern.

    KK97 will almost certainly be averaging $12M+ on his next deal. McDavid is the only one over $12M currently, but that will change as the cap begins to escalate this year. A healthy Wild team would have been competing for the playoffs last season. They have young talent that is developing, and cap space to improve after this season. Kaprizov should have a shot to win with the Wild after this season.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...