Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • Does Auston Matthews Set the Market For Kirill Kaprizov's Next Deal?


    Image courtesy of Stephen R. Sylvanie-USA TODAY Sports
    Tony Abbott

    On Wednesday, the NHL saw the first Mega Deal of the Rising Cap Era. Auston Matthews signed a four-year extension with the Toronto Maple Leafs that has him set to be the highest-paid player in the NHL in 2024-25, with a $13.25 million Average Annual Value (AAV). It comes in anticipation of the salary cap finally rising after COVID-related financial issues deflated it for years.

    The jump from Nathan MacKinnon's league-leading $12.6 million AAV is notable enough in itself. That it's over four years, when the trend in the NHL is more years = more money, is pretty eye-opening. Evolving-Hockey's contract projections had Matthews at $12.83 million on a four-year deal, using a $90 million salary cap as a baseline (it's currently $83.5 million).

    The good news for Toronto is that even at the highest AAV in the NHL, Matthews is still wildly underpaid. In fact, it's arguably impossible for him to be properly paid in the NHL. The CBA bars players from making more than 20% of the salary cap, or a $16.7 million AAV as of this season. Even coming off a season where Matthews "only" scored 40 goals and 85 points, he's still easily worth the league maximum, if not more.

    But you're on Hockey Wilderness, your Minnesota Wild site, so you might be wondering why we're talking about this. Matthews' contract has massive implications for the Wild, because we're finally getting a sense of what a superstar player is going to earn over the next few years. And with Minnesota needing to extend true superstar Kirill Kaprizov around two years from now, Matthews might well set the market.

    One could correctly point out that Matthews is a superior player to Kaprizov. Not only does Matthews play the premium position (center) as opposed to the wing, but Matthews outshines Kaprizov in basically every stat. Since Kaprizov broke into the league, Matthews has the edge in goals (141 to 116), points (257 to 234), and a huge edge in Evolving-Hockey's Standings Points Above Replacement (24.0 SPAR to 14.5).

    So why should we expect Kaprizov to make Matthews-level money?

    Don't fool yourselves. The Wild need Kaprizov as much as the Leafs need Matthews. Not only is Kaprizov the only star talent to walk through Minnesota's door since Marian Gaborik, but he transcends the game in a way Gaborik couldn't. The hockey world at large could ignore Gaborik, dismiss Zach Parise, and say That's who he's playing for? about Eric Staal when they'd go on impressive runs for Minnesota.

    But the league takes notice when Kaprizov is doing his thing. He's already won the only major player award in team history (apologies to the Jennings and Masterton Trophies) with the Calder Trophy. He has also received Hart Trophy votes in all three seasons. Kaprizov's not just incredible at hockey, he's marketable in a way no one else in team history has been. He's the Face of the Franchise.

    That will have to come with Face of the Franchise-level pay. And one thing's for sure: Kaprizov's not going to sign another bargain basement contract to stay in Minnesota.

    It sounds kind of absurd to say that the player who got a five-year, $45 million contract immediately after his rookie season signed for a bargain basement deal. In the aftermath of the signing, many felt the Wild took on a lot of risk and/or overpaid. No one feels that way now, and that deal is turning into a steal for Minnesota. 

    The Athletic's Dom Luszczyszyn rated Kaprizov's market value in his 47-goal, 108-point 2021-22 season to be worth $14.6 million. Last season's market value is trickier to locate, but he projects Kaprizov to provide $12.6 million of surplus value on his $9 million AAV over the next three years. Divide that $12.6 million by three, then add it to the $9 million, and we get a projected market value of...

    Well, look at that. $13.2 million per season. $50K per year short of what Matthews just got. 

    Mind you, Kaprizov negotiated his last deal with very little in the way of actual leverage on his side. He had no arbitration rights after his rookie season, and no teams could make him an offer for him to sign as a Restricted Free Agent. All he had, really, was the nuclear option of going back to Russia, which would have hurt him nearly as much as Minnesota.

    Yet, he still got more money than the Wild wanted to give him, for fewer years than they wanted to extend him.

    None of this is necessarily earth-shattering. Most Wild fans knew coming into this week that whatever contract Kaprizov was going to get to extend in Minnesota, it was going to have to be big. But with Matthews inking the first huge deal of a league with an economic landscape much different than what we've seen in recent years, we got our first piece of the puzzle of what the actual number might be.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Quote

    The Wild need Kaprizov as much as the Leafs need Matthews.

    That is the crux of the issue. All visions of a Minnesota Wild that is actually in contention for the Stanley Cup depend on KK remaining with the team. As good as Boldy, JEE, Gustavson, Wallstedt, and the exciting prospects may be, this team has a hard ceiling below championship-level without KK (or another true superstar).

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Will KK want to stay in Minnesota? Money or not will be the multi million dollar question though. Players of his caliber will always get paid so will he value being here. Does he see a winning future here and can he properly market himself here? Many athletes like him make good side money with sponsors, endorsements and advertising. Does Minnesota offer those other intangibles? I sure as hell hope so. 

    Edited by Cole_Train
    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    My guess is he gets $15MM/yr, which would be his current salary  + less than half of our current cap penalty if you want to look at it that way.  If he completes his current contract and it's summer 2026 when the new contract kicks in, he gets that easily.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, Velgey said:

    That is the crux of the issue. All visions of a Minnesota Wild that is actually in contention for the Stanley Cup depend on KK remaining with the team. As good as Boldy, JEE, Gustavson, Wallstedt, and the exciting prospects may be, this team has a hard ceiling below championship-level without KK (or another true superstar).

    Just look at how many cups Matthews has brought to Toronto, or McDavid has brought to Edmonton.

    It seems that teams that are going deep into the playoffs recently are built with more distributed talent across all lines...look at how TBL/VGK are built.  What's better, 3 players making $8M or 2 players making $12M?

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I hope this isn't the first time all Wild fans have pondered this.

    This is now closer to reality than we would like and sooner than later now that the Matthew's contract is done.

    I believe biospher's estimate of $15 average is right on the money making him the next highest paid player.

    Do the Wild have a choice or are they already planning that party based on everything. Player movement, the salary cap strategy, the young Russian influx. I'd say it's a no brainer and part of the long term plan.

    So with that settled, does KK want to be here. The answer is complicated to a point. Minnesota is exactly the physical location KK would chose based on where he's from and what he's shown. He's not a big city, big media player or need the limelight or even care. The most important piece is he wants to win...playoff games and Stanley Cup games. Next, he needs a surrounding cast. Finally, get paid and have a coach and GM he trusts to get him there.

    So you see the answers are in the context and the planning has begun and is going so far as planned. 

    This talk about bringing in a true 1C for KK is a huge talking point right now. We all can dream about who, but we better consider one HUGE factor when we spend all this alleged salary cap pie in the coming years.  Let's not jeopardize KK's long term contract,  the supporting cast, and of all these young studs coming up who also will need to get paid.

    This will be BG's defining moment. I myself believe he has a plan, has sacrificed and is willing to be smart about all of this.  This is not a two year plan, five year plan. This will be a decade in the making.

    So stand by, don't get crazy Wild fans, be patient. We will be rewarded. 

    "IBGIT"

      

     

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    36 minutes ago, MrCheatachu said:

    Just look at how many cups Matthews has brought to Toronto, or McDavid has brought to Edmonton.

    That's a fair point about Matthews and McDavid. No one player is good enough to elevate a team to a cup. Vegas is a more well-rounded team than either Edmonton or Toronto, but I think some of that comes down to shrewd contracts. Stone is underpaid at $9.5 million cap/year. Eichel's contract was signed six years ago, so his cap hit looks small compared to McDavid or Matthews.

    Colorado has three players paid as much or more than Kaprizov.

    The Lightning signed their stars to massive contracts, but like Eichel, many are already several years old and thus don't look quite that massive today. Stamkos, Kucherov, Sergachev, Hedman, and Vasilevsky only fit because they were signed to long contracts and some manipulation of LTIR (where Brent Seabrook's cap hit currently resides for Tampa Bay). 

    Most teams that have recently won the Cup have done so with one or more superstars on the roster. Some may been getting paid a couple million less than comparable players, but I think that has more to do with long contract length and the cap moving up. The Tampa Bay, Colorado, Washington, and Chicago championship teams were all built with one or two players that are among the top 5 for their position. Kaprizov is a top 5 left wing. He's the only unquestionable top 5 player we have on the team. He's going to get paid like it, whether that's with Minnesota or somewhere else.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Velgey said:

    Colorado has three players paid as much or more than Kaprizov.

    When the Aves won the cup, MacK was in the last year of his $6.3M AAV contract.

    They were unable to sustain that team success when you have cap casualties such as not being able to retain Kadri (who was underpaid on a 1-year 'prove it' deal) AND Burakovsky.

    The trend right now seems to be signing your young players to 'Boldy-esqe' deals in hopes that your window is open when you have a shot of managing.  Capfriendly list of players sorted by AAV last season, it's notably missing any team that made it to the conference finals (FLA, CAR, DAL, VGK) and it doesnt get much better if you add in TOR, NJD, EDM and SEA.  Of those 8 teams, only 2 of them are on this list...

     

    Logo of the Colorado AvalancheCOL 15.3% $12,600,000
    Logo of the Edmonton OilersEDM 16.7% $12,500,000
    Logo of the New York RangersNYR 14.3% $11,642,857
    Logo of the Toronto Maple LeafsTOR 14.6% $11,640,250
    Logo of the Pittsburgh PenguinsPIT 14.5% $11,500,000
    Logo of the Boston BruinsBOS 13.6% $11,250,000
    Logo of the Toronto Maple LeafsTOR 13.8% $11,000,000
    Logo of the Los Angeles KingsLAK 13.8% $11,000,000
    Logo of the Toronto Maple LeafsTOR 13.4% $10,903,000
    Logo of the Calgary FlamesCGY 12.7% $10,500,000

     

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, MrCheatachu said:

    When the Aves won the cup, MacK was in the last year of his $6.3M AAV contract.

    They were unable to sustain that team success when you have cap casualties such as not being able to retain Kadri (who was underpaid on a 1-year 'prove it' deal) AND Burakovsky.

    The trend right now seems to be signing your young players to 'Boldy-esqe' deals in hopes that your window is open when you have a shot of managing.  Capfriendly list of players sorted by AAV last season, it's notably missing any team that made it to the conference finals (FLA, CAR, DAL, VGK) and it doesnt get much better if you add in TOR, NJD, EDM and SEA.  Of those 8 teams, only 2 of them are on this list...

     

    Logo of the Colorado AvalancheCOL 15.3% $12,600,000
    Logo of the Edmonton OilersEDM 16.7% $12,500,000
    Logo of the New York RangersNYR 14.3% $11,642,857
    Logo of the Toronto Maple LeafsTOR 14.6% $11,640,250
    Logo of the Pittsburgh PenguinsPIT 14.5% $11,500,000
    Logo of the Boston BruinsBOS 13.6% $11,250,000
    Logo of the Toronto Maple LeafsTOR 13.8% $11,000,000
    Logo of the Los Angeles KingsLAK 13.8% $11,000,000
    Logo of the Toronto Maple LeafsTOR 13.4% $10,903,000
    Logo of the Calgary FlamesCGY 12.7% $10,500,000

     

    I would hope the Wild's window is the next 3-5 years before they have a Av's situation. Cant pay them all....

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    No way should Kap make Matthews money. Not as good and not a center. Cap could be widely different but I just don’t see him as a $15 million player unless the cap is raised a lot to compensate.

    If her wants that kind of money then he better be putting up 100 point seasons from now until good next contract.

    • Haha 1
    • Confused 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 minutes ago, TCMooch said:

    No way should Kap make Matthews money. Not as good and not a center. Cap could be widely different but I just don’t see him as a $15 million player unless the cap is raised a lot to compensate.

    If her wants that kind of money then he better be putting up 100 point seasons from now until good next contract.

    That sounds like a great idea to me...

     

    ....And if anyone wonders why the Leafs can't get over the hump and win a Cup, I'd point to their top 3 players making $33.5MM / year (41.8% of the cap) even before Matthews got his extra $1.6MM.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Athletiic said the cap percentage of Matthews’ deal is identical to MacKinnon’s. Looks like that’s 15%. So just take whatever you think the cap will be in 24-25 and multiple by .15. My guess is KK gets $14 million. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 hours ago, Cole_Train said:

    Will KK want to stay in Minnesota? Money or not will be the multi million dollar question though. Players of his caliber will always get paid so will he value being here. Does he see a winning future here and can he properly market himself here? Many athletes like him make good side money with sponsors, endorsements and advertising. Does Minnesota offer those other intangibles? I sure as hell hope so. 

    I think the answer to those questions is yes. I think he's happy with the community and with the prospects coming, I believe he sees a way to win here. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 hours ago, vonlonster67 said:

    This talk about bringing in a true 1C for KK is a huge talking point right now. We all can dream about who, but we better consider one HUGE factor when we spend all this alleged salary cap pie in the coming years.  Let's not jeopardize KK's long term contract,  the supporting cast, and of all these young studs coming up who also will need to get paid.

    It's not the cap the #1C gobbles up, it's the hope of winning. That is the thing that is missing the most. That #1C helps us win! And, that is specifically why we need to go after the opportunity!

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 hours ago, vonlonster67 said:

    Minnesota is exactly the physical location KK would chose based on where he's from and what he's shown. He's not a big city, big media player or need the limelight or even care.

    This statement is puzzling.

    how do you know?

    You know he played for CSKA Moscow right?

    someone correct me if I’m wrong but I’m pretty sure that’s one of the biggest hockey market teams in the KHL.

    I don’t think any of us really knows what his intentions are and I’m certain not as sure as you that he’ll stay. 

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, Mateo3xm said:

    This statement is puzzling.

    how do you know?

    You know he played for CSKA Moscow right?

    someone correct me if I’m wrong but I’m pretty sure that’s one of the biggest hockey market teams in the KHL.

    I don’t think any of us really knows what his intentions are and I’m certain not as sure as you that he’ll stay. 

     

    I too was wondering how velociraptor had so much conviction

    • Like 1
    • Confused 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, Mateo3xm said:

    This statement is puzzling.

    how do you know?

    You know he played for CSKA Moscow right?

    someone correct me if I’m wrong but I’m pretty sure that’s one of the biggest hockey market teams in the KHL.

    I don’t think any of us really knows what his intentions are and I’m certain not as sure as you that he’ll stay. 

     

    Where he played was a reflection of his talent and has nothing to do with it based on Russian politics. He was born and raised in a outlying area in Russia. His family is very much off the main grid from suburban areas of Russia in Novokuznetsk. He and his brother are big outdoorsman and  family are far from big city. Where he grew up is much like Minnesota. 

    He'll stay if he can win, location, his team and a fair contract are secondary. If you paid attention to his demeanor,  interaction with the media versus his teammates it pretty easy to see.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    It's not the cap the #1C gobbles up, it's the hope of winning. That is the thing that is missing the most. That #1C helps us win! And, that is specifically why we need to go after the opportunity!

    Right player/person, right contract, and culture only otherwise you are mortgaging our future. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    I think the answer to those questions is yes. I think he's happy with the community and with the prospects coming, I believe he sees a way to win here. 

    BG is a huge piece of the pie to this as he was the only person KK respected to come to the USA. Other GMs failed. 

    I believe KK respects BG as a player previous to GM and was a piece of the puzzle to come here, sign the last contract and the next. DE is the wildcard at this point.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    I too was wondering how velociraptor had so much conviction

    What is the literal meaning of Velociraptor?

    The word velociraptor combines the Latin velox, "swift," and raptor, "robber or plunderer."

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'd like to be a fly on the wall during BG's conversations with KK97. His trust in BG is going to be huge moving forward. 

    KK is going to be 28 when his current contract is up, with Matthews his extension gets him up to age 30. Don't know what a term for him looks like at that point but a lot can change in 3 seasons and we're all along for the ride.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Quote

    Does Auston Matthews Set the Market For Kirill Kaprizov's Next Deal?

    It sets a market for future deals for all top players, so yes in a way, but with KK97's next deal being 3 years away from starting, there will be a lot of other deals that will better set the expected terms of his deal.

    This is why Guerin kind of had to sign him to 5 years, because adding any more out years would have required at least $12M per season, which would have substantially increased the average cap hit(at least .5M per season), and the Wild were already going to be tight on money for most of his deal.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    20 hours ago, Cole_Train said:

    Will KK want to stay in Minnesota? Money or not will be the multi million dollar question though. Players of his caliber will always get paid so will he value being here. Does he see a winning future here and can he properly market himself here? Many athletes like him make good side money with sponsors, endorsements and advertising. Does Minnesota offer those other intangibles? I sure as hell hope so. 

    Mn has a fan base that to often brings politics into their decisions on weather to support players when they reach star status so hopefully that doesnt happen here .  Before #97 can want to be here he has to be welcomed here .  

    • Confused 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 minutes ago, Dango said:

    Mn has a fan base that to often brings politics into their decisions on weather to support players when they reach star status so hopefully that doesnt happen here .  Before #97 can want to be here he has to be welcomed here .  

    How do you figure that he hasn't been welcomed here??

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, M_Nels said:

    How do you figure that he hasn't been welcomed here??

    Im just looking at the future for when he has  bigger expectation being a mn icon  which usually comes with success and money etc .  Hopefully it all stays good and nothing sours it  .  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, Dango said:

    Mn has a fan base that to often brings politics into their decisions on weather to support players when they reach star status so hopefully that doesnt happen here .  Before #97 can want to be here he has to be welcomed here .  

    Dango, as you know, I am an out of market fan. What is your evidence to support this comment? I didn't think when I lived there that this was the way we looked at players. With all of the stars in MN, across all sports with the possible exception of the NBA, if the stars produced, I feel like they were accepted into the community just fine. However, it's been almost 40 years since I moved out. 

    I always found politics to take a 2nd seat to production.....or maybe even further back!

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...