Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness
  • The Bedard Era Blackhawks Can Still Be Terrible


    Image courtesy of Anne-Marie Sorvin-USA Today Sports
    Tony Abbott

    On Monday night, the worst-case scenario for the NHL happened. Fans everywhere mourned to see that Connor Bedard, the shining light of the league's future, was sentenced by Gary Bettman's Ping Pong Ball Mafia to join the Chicago Blackhawks organization.

    It's a result that absolutely no one outside of the state of Illinois wanted to see. It's one thing to see a generational prospect just so happen to land in the biggest possible market at basically the exact second their 15-year run of success turned sour. We might even be able to get past the fact that the City of Chicago, famous for rigging elections, somehow got the most rigged-seeming result possible. But the franchise that covered up an employee's abuse of Kyle Beach getting rewarded with the best player since Connor McDavid feels gross on a level that's difficult to articulate.

    For Minnesota Wild fans and the rest of the Central Division, it's an extra-bitter pill to swallow as they can see a future where they have to go through Bedard to get to a Stanley Cup. The Calgary Flames don't enjoy getting torched by McDavid every postseason. No one in the Atlantic enjoyed having to go through Sidney Crosby and Alex Ovechkin. Now, it's the Wild's turn to become cannon fodder for a generational player.

    Or, so we think right now. But is there still hope that Chicago can squander Bedard's career?

    Maybe so, Wild fans, maybe so. Because here's the thing: Tanking is easy. Now comes the hard part for the Blackhawks.

    Teams that stripped down to the studs in an effort to tank for Bedard, be warned: You aren't a generational prospect away from a dynasty, let alone competing. 

    I mean, just look at that roster! Of course you have to be bad to get competitive for the Bedard draft, but jeez, this team is awful. Their best player is Seth Jones, who turns 29 next season, gets $9.5 million until 2029-30 (when Bedard is 25), and already is what kids Bedard's age call "mid." 

    image.png

    That's pretty much their only NHL player. 21 players logged 400 or more minutes for Chicago last year. Only 10 of them weren't in the negatives for Goals Above Replacement. Just three were worth even one point in the standings.

    You just don't build that up overnight, especially when your prospect cupboard is pretty barren outside of Kevin Korchinski and Lukas Reichel. Bedard had better cross his fingers that Frank Nazar III does a little better this year than putting up seven points in 13 games on a loaded Michigan team next year.

    Now, a terrible team means a lot of cap space. But Minnesota should worry absolutely zero percent about that this year, at the very least. You want to bring Max Domi back? The entire NHL is quaking with fear. Maybe get a relatively young free agent like Tyler Bertuzzi? Please. For his career, the Boston Bruins forward has as many playoff series wins as he does COVID shots: Zero.

    It can't be understated how much infrastructure the best draft prospects in the last 20 years have had coming into the league. The Pittsburgh Penguins had Evgeni Malkin before they landed Crosby, even if it took him a year to arrive from Russia. McDavid stepped into the league with Leon Draisaitl and Taylor Hall alongside him. Mitch Marner and William Nylander were riding shotgun with Auston Matthews the second he got in the league. Even Patrick Kane had Jonathan Toews and Duncan Keith by the time he made the NHL. 

    Ovechkin is one of the only of that group of generational players who didn't have that kind of running mate in place for him when the Washington Capitals drafted him. But Nicklas Backstrom (the good one) came into the organization a year later, so they were at least able to remedy that quickly.

    We're talking high-upside, top-six picks in the draft for all these guys. The Blackhawks don't have a second one like that. Therefore, the only way they'll get one is if they get lucky and land an Elias Pettersson or Matthews in free agency in a couple of years.

    Or, hey, maybe Bettman can force Minnesota to trade Kaprizov to Chicago, since he's in the giving mood. Bettman can even dump another $10 million of retroactive cap penalties on the Wild for good measure.

    In all seriousness, the Blackhawks could easily go down the Jack Eichel road here. The Buffalo Sabres also went for broke to get a generational stud in McDavid, then landed Eichel as a really good consolation prize. A decade in Buffalo broke him, in more ways than one. Awful contracts to the likes of Matt Moulson, Kyle Okposo, and Jeff Skinner made it impossible to compete, drove No. 1 center Ryan O'Reilly away, and then finally, Eichel forced his way out of town.

    That sounds like maybe a comforting fantasy to Wild fans. But remember, even the Oilers have only just barely gotten it together with McDavid and Draisaitl. Just look at their history since drafting McDavid:

    2015-16: Missed playoffs
    2016-17: Lost in second round
    2017-18: Missed playoffs
    2018-19: Missed playoffs
    2019-20: Lost to below .500 team in Qualifying Round of COVID bubble
    2020-21: Swept in first round
    2021-22: Swept in Conference Finals

    Maybe this is all just cope and two seasons from now, the Wild will go right back to being Chicago's little brother who gives them a swirlie in the playoffs year in, year out. But you can never count out an NHL general manager when it comes to completely botching a golden opportunity. If the Oilers can do it with two of the best scorers we've ever seen, the Blackhawks can do it with Bedard, Jones, and a ragtag group of B+ prospects, overpaid vets, and nobodies. We can hope, anyway, right?

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    Sounds like to me they will just need to have the NHL continue to gift them the first draft picks in the next few years so then they have a really nice trio of players to build around as they establish the new Kane-Toews-Keith 2.0.

    Either way, the Wild aren't in a position to really give a crap about anybody in our division or conference as we are also currently a dumpster fire from a player and cap position. Honestly, I'm surprised if we'll even be able to keep Kaprizov or want to keep him.

    I think he enters free agency in 3 years (which is around the time when we'll be actually able to build a team around him because of our buyouts). He will be 29 having played for a shit team that either can't make the playoffs or gets bounced first round each time.

    He will be looking to both get paid again before his 30s as well as probably find a team that is more of a Stanley Cup contender. I think at this point the Wild will need to overpay to keep him here and thus be subject to shit play from him on an albatross contract once he hits 32+ years of age.

    Stop me if you've heard this story before because this seems to be the exact cycle the Wild have been in for the past decade.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I don't know if anything is rigged, but in the 21'st century and how most everything bad is being sold as good and everything seems to be backwards you just never know I guess. The officiation has gone from bad to what in the actual eff status also.

    That being said, for teams like Chicago to fade from star status to immediately getting the most sure thing since Kane and Toews to start a dynasty all over again, much like Pitt with Lemieux and Crosby just isn't good for the league.  

    It just doesn't seem like the NHL gets anything right, ever...

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 hours ago, TCMooch said:

    Sounds like to me they will just need to have the NHL continue to gift them the first draft picks in the next few years so then they have a really nice trio of players to build around as they establish the new Kane-Toews-Keith 2.0.

    Either way, the Wild aren't in a position to really give a crap about anybody in our division or conference as we are also currently a dumpster fire from a player and cap position. Honestly, I'm surprised if we'll even be able to keep Kaprizov or want to keep him.

    I think he enters free agency in 3 years (which is around the time when we'll be actually able to build a team around him because of our buyouts). He will be 29 having played for a shit team that either can't make the playoffs or gets bounced first round each time.

    He will be looking to both get paid again before his 30s as well as probably find a team that is more of a Stanley Cup contender. I think at this point the Wild will need to overpay to keep him here and thus be subject to shit play from him on an albatross contract once he hits 32+ years of age.

    Stop me if you've heard this story before because this seems to be the exact cycle the Wild have been in for the past decade.

    I really couldn’t agree more honestly.

    I think we lose Kap after his contract is up.

    This team is headed in the same old direction unless they do an actual proper tank.

    we have one of the best prospect pools supposedly but no game breaking talent like a Barkov, Pastrnak, thuchuk, Matthew’s, Mac, Makar etc.

    • Sad 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I can’t help but feel like this draft is rigged after watching.

    Why did they not do the little balls live instead of just telling you what the picks are?

    it just seems odd to me that Chicago got the pick. It’s so incredibly irritating seeing them get Bedard.

    Am I the only one that thinks this seems fishy?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    No we all know it's rigged. 

    Like CBJ or any of the other crappy teams if the Wild tanked let's say, they'd get 6th overall and Brackett would pick some Euro player ahead of Tkachuk.

    I've lost faith in so many institutions and organizations, I really don't believe the NHL is the epitome of integrity and trustworthy fair practice. Absolutely not. No way, not a chance.

    The refs are caught on hot mics talking about what team they're gonna penalize next. Player safety department, draft lottery, scandals, and every other type of impropriety can be exemplified. We just have a short memory and keep coming back because we like the game. 

     

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 hours ago, Mateo3xm said:

    I really couldn’t agree more honestly.

    I think we lose Kap after his contract is up.

    This team is headed in the same old direction unless they do an actual proper tank.

    we have one of the best prospect pools supposedly but no game breaking talent like a Barkov, Pastrnak, thuchuk, Matthew’s, Mac, Makar etc.

    They better trade him now then. He gets a NMC in '24-'25 and '25-'26. 

    Its supposed to be an incredibly deep draft class and there's definitely some Cs with good size/skill in the top-16...

     

    Bonus, moving Kaprizov means we don't need to keep Zuccy in the top-6 anymore!  

    Edited by B1GKappa97
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    17 minutes ago, B1GKappa97 said:

    They better trade him now then. He gets a NMC in '24-'25 and '25-'26. 

    NMCs are not what they seem. You can still trade a player with that, it's just that the player has the control to say no. He'd probably say no to Ottawa, but you give him a decent destination like south Florida, perhaps he says yes?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    NMCs are not what they seem. You can still trade a player with that, it's just that the player has the control to say no. He'd probably say no to Ottawa, but you give him a decent destination like south Florida, perhaps he says yes?

    It kills your leverage though. Especially if he eventually decides there's only one or two teams who he will be willing to be traded to. 

    Who wants to be the GM that only gets a 2nd round pick for Kirill Kaprizov in his prime? 

    Edited by B1GKappa97
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    18 hours ago, B1GKappa97 said:

    Who wants to be the GM that only gets a 2nd round pick for Kirill Kaprizov in his prime? 

    I think if a GM hears that Kaprizov wants to come play for them, they are elated and in that euphoria will slip us more than a 2nd round pick. It would be a nice haul. Every GM in this league knows Kaprizov is special.

    You'd probably even get unprotected 1sts in that equation.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...