Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness
  • Charlie Stramel Is Ready To Put Last Season's Struggles Behind Him


    Image courtesy of © Christopher Hanewinc - USA TODAY Sports
    Luke Sims

    Hockey Wilderness is counting down the Minnesota Wild’s Top-10 Prospects, as voted by our staff. Today, we give you everything you need to know about our No. 10 prospect, Charlie Stramel.

    The Minnesota Wild were down one “Big Rig” after trading Jordan Greenway last season, so it was obviously an organizational priority to get another one. They accomplished this mission when they took Rosemount’s Charlie Stramel 21st overall in this year’s draft out of the University of Wisconsin. 

    Stramel is regarded as a big, two-way, physical center with some skill, something that the Wild brass (and the entire state of Minnesota) thought the organization was missing in their prospect pool. They doubled down on that in the second round, taking another big centerman in Rasmus Kumpulainen. 

    Stramel is 6-foot-3 and weighs over 220 pounds and his athleticism is off the charts for a kid his size. Combine scores don’t hold as much value in the NHL as they do in sports like the NFL, but Stramel’s performance was notable. The power in his lower body literally jumps at you, and his upper-body strength was just as impressive.

    If you talked to scouts before last season, Stramel was a projected top-ten pick. His size, skill, and upside were coveted among this class. There were multiple respected draft gurus that had Stramel in the top ten of their rankings. The Athletic's Corey Pronman as well as Ryan Kennedy of The Hockey News both had Stramel ranked at eight overall. TSN's Craig Button ranked him ninth in the class at one point.

    The biggest knock on Stramel was his lack of production in his freshman season in Madison. He was seventh on the team in points with 12. Despite playing most of the season on the top line, he registered just five goals.

    It should be noted that Stramel was one of the youngest players in all of college hockey last season, and still might be next year, seeing as he won't turn 19 until this fall. He easily could have waited a year to play and been a freshman this season. Stramel also faced some of the toughest competition in the entire NCAA as Minnesota and Michigan, two Big Ten powerhouses, returned to relevance and had terrific seasons. Penn State and Michigan State also finished as top-ten teams in the nation. All told, 18 of the Badger's 33 games were against those teams. 

    During his 2021-22 season with the USA U18 team, Stramel was nearly a point-per-game player. As one of the youngest players on that team, Stramel did not struggle to produce. In fact, he was also one of the youngest players on that team the year prior, making the U18 team as a 16-year-old, putting himself in rare company.

    Stramel's stats at that age are very similar to that of Ottawa Senators captain Brady Tkachuk. Stramel scored at a pace of 0.88 points per game, while Tkachuk scored at a 0.91 points per game pace. If that’s any kind of projection for a player that Stramel could be, Wild fans should be hootin’ and hollerin’. The younger Tkachuk brother is another solid comparison to Stramel. Tkachuk and Stramel share some similar characteristics. At the very least, he’s an American power forward with offensive upside. 

    Anytime you can be in the same conversation as Phil Kessel, you must be doing something right. That Matthews fella ain’t bad either. Oh, and Wild legend Jordan Schroeder. What a group to join. 

    I had the privilege of talking to one of his former teammates, and he gave me some more insight into Stramel’s game. He wanted to be left anonymous, so I’ll summarize his comments below. 

    Stramel’s skill and what he brings to the game is apparent. He plays a full 200-foot game. He’s not afraid to work hard or go to the areas where opponents will batter him. Stramel will be there to battle for pucks in the corner or in front of the net. He’s tenacious, fighting for loose pucks or in puck battles on the boards. Stramel works his butt off on the backcheck and the forecheck. 

    He’s got a rocket of a shot and is a really tough skater. Stramel plays to his size and can dominate other players with his length and reach. He’s not afraid to play the body and elevates the situation. 

    On a more personal level, he called Stramel an awesome teammate. He’s always the positive voice in the locker room. Not a cocky player at all. He stays humble out there and just works. 

    Below are some more highlights that showcase what Stramel can bring to the table. 

    Goal off the rush:

    Nifty centering pass:

    Revere hit entering the offensive zone: 

    Hockey Prospecting is a website that projects players based on their NHL Equivalency (NHLe) in their respective leagues. This model is not a huge fan of Stramel. The stats show that 6 out of 10 of the players who look like Stramel that teams draft in the first or second round don’t play 200 NHL games. 

    Guys like Rusty Fitzgerald and Mike Zigomanis are the most common player comparisons to Stramel. Yeah, I have no idea who they are either. 

    But Roope Hintz of the Dallas Stars is a more recent example of a player who had a similar development path. Hintz also saw a dip in production during his draft season. But he rebounded the next year, and we all know what he goes on to do. 12 points in six playoff games against the Wild last spring makes him hard to forget.

    Stramel Hintz chart.png

    Hintz and Stramel are similar-sized players. They play a bit of a different style, though. Hintz is more of a finesse player who’s an excellent skater. Stramel uses his size more and is not as great of a skater. But they both have excellent shots and passing ability. They are also responsible centers. If Stramel turns out like Hintz, he’ll be a home run pick for his hometown team. 

    Charlie Stramel also is of the Charlie Coyle mold. They are large players (6-foot-3, in the 220 pound range) who play a two-way game. Stramel and Coyle use their size, have good foot speed, and have good vision. They are also consistent on the puck and can contribute offensively. In terms of play style and potential role with the Wild, they are very similar players. 

    Stramel probably won’t ever be a point-per-game player., but Coyle wasn’t either. Coyle has turned into a responsible, middle-six center capable of putting up 40 to 50 points, peaking with 56 in the 2016-17 season.

    Stramel is not the guy the Wild expect to anchor the top line. But he could slot into a middle-six role and be a positive force at both ends. Becoming a Brock Nelson-type player is a good way to think of what his potential peak could look like. Someone with a big frame who can play at both ends of the ice. 

    Most of the scouts agree that Stramel will be an NHL player one day, lumping him into a group of high-floor, low-ceiling type of players. The Wild even said they passed on more skilled players in favor of Stramel. 

    Looking to next year, Wisconsin brought in new head coach Mike Hastings after the abysmal season they had last year. He should change the culture and bring a little more stability. Hastings coached for 11 seasons at Mankato, racking up an incredible 299-109-25 record, which makes him the NCAA's active leader in win percentage as a coach.

    “I think we have a lot better tools in place overall,” Stramel said, self-evaluating. “But I do think [I need to keep] learning, rewatching games, and figuring out what I need to [do to] take a whole 'nother step in my sophomore year.”

    Stramel recognizes that he struggled last year, he’s ready and willing to learn from that and be better this season. Stramel will give Minnesotans a reason to pay attention to hockey in Wisconsin this season. He’s had a year to process the hardships of playing in the NCAA. But with a new coach and a new system, this year should be fun for Stramel and help him get back on track. 

    All stats and data via Elite Prospects and HockeyDB.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 3

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Luke we always appreciate your insight and you gave us the good and the not so good comparison,

    Stramel will do us well. We have never had that size or physical presence in front of the net. A 200 foot game, digging pucks out in the corner, going skate to skate with the bigger D and dominating others.  I'm sure EEK will appreciate the focus shifting off him at least a few shifts.

    Stramel looks like he could suit up and play some pigskin games on Sundays for the Purple.

    Can't believe I'm going to have to watch Bucky 😳 Badger hockey and even cheer this predicament on. It will be a first.

     

     

    • Like 6
    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It is fun to imagine the Wild having two of the first three centers the size of Ek and Stramel. It would seem to make opponents have to pick their poison. That is always a good thing.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 minutes ago, Up North Guy said:

    It is fun to imagine the Wild having two of the first three centers the size of Ek and Stramel. It would seem to make opponents have to pick their poison. That is always a good thing.

    Here's hoping Kumpulainen we took in the 2nd round and Yurov are another option.

    Many tools coming our way depending on  what style we want to play or shift our smaller centers to wing or play the speed game with Rossi, Khusnutdinov, and Heidt up the middle and shift our biggens to wing 😎.

    Deano wont know what to fo with all his options if he don't have to play the same lines...like he does now. Options are good to have in the playoffs. 

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This will be a big year for Stramel.  He will be 19 and in his 2nd year of college with his 2nd coach.  Hopefully we see a big uptick in production from him.  I do like that BG drafted several C players and has more options in the pipeline.  

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    18 minutes ago, MNCountryLife said:

    This will be a big year for Stramel.  He will be 19 and in his 2nd year of college with his 2nd coach.  Hopefully we see a big uptick in production from him.  I do like that BG drafted several C players and has more options in the pipeline.  

    MNCL, Mike Hastings should be the perfect fit for "Stram da Man"!  Cant imagine starting your hockey career at 17 and have the chance to play NHL out of college at 20.

    Hastings has used a steady stream of mature men to fill out his rosters the past few years at Mankato ( usually 23-26 yoa). He has worked with many who were either Canadian players looking for a college venue and chance or the overlooked, underestimated, transfers who were past over by bigger programs.

    Now he is that bigger program with all of that experience and national stage history. Should be the perfect fit for  Stramel.

    Edited by vonlonster67
    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, vonlonster67 said:

    Here's hoping Kumpulainen we took in the 2nd round and Yurov are another option.

    Many tools coming our way depending on  what style we want to play or shift our smaller centers to wing or play the speed game with Rossi, Khusnutdinov, and Heidt up the middle and shift our biggens to wing 😎.

    Deano wont know what to fo with all his options if he don't have to play the same lines...like he does now. Options are good to have in the playoffs. 

    You always act like DE is a fuckup who doesn't know what he's doing. He coached this team of castoffs, for the most part, into the playoffs for two years now when no one thought that he had the talent to make it. 

     

     

    • Like 1
    • Sad 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think Stramel would be viewed quite differently had he played with USNDTP.

    Likely would have been a top 20 guy. I think his path to college hockey somewhat early will pay off. He's got top potential to reach the NHL quickly, maybe more than most MN prospects who aren't yet to the AHL. 

    The Wild need options. The young players in the system bring a nice variety of elements. 

    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Willy the poor boy said:

    You always act like DE is a fuckup who doesn't know what he's doing. He coached this team of castoffs, for the most part, into the playoffs for two years now when no one thought that he had the talent to make it. 

     

     

    Well, he's no Pete DeBoer who actually did coach a bunch of cast offs in Vegas and won a lot and outcoached DE, and Deano had no answers or adjustments other than to change goalies, game two in Dallas, no adjustments for their PP or our lines, only when the game is out of hand .

    He's no Craig Berube who adjusted the shit out of DE the year before after a two game lead...so you tell me? Castoffs? with KK, Zucci, a young Boldy in the mix. He failed to take control of the team, dumb penalty after dumb penalty, played a guy with a broken fibula, and his adjustment was complain to the officials because he wasn't getting the calls instead of focusing on the problem, fair calls or unfair, that's the game. DeBoer blew off the Dumba call and took the focus away for his team and adjusted to the game.

    DE coached this team to two 100+ point season. Kudos!, but he has a lot to learn about playoff hockey and I don't see BG being patient enough to let it go beyond 25-26 if things don't change in the playoffs.

    • Like 5
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    He’s so young and had a tough year personally last year. I’m giving him the benefit of the doubt. I think another year of maturing and a whole offseason to prepare will do him wonders. I hate the Charlie Coyle comparison. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    IMO DE is a terrible coach for the reasons previous comments laid out. His only schtick is freddy g. His answer to everything is freddy g. The sooner those two get separated the better! I doubt DE will get another look at playoffs with this wild team. 

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, vonlonster67 said:

    Deano wont know what to fo with all his options if he don't have to play the same lines...like he does now. Options are good to have in the playoffs. 

    Call me pessimistic, but I'm doubting Evason will be here by the time they arrive.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, vonlonster67 said:

    Well, he's no Pete DeBoer who actually did coach a bunch of cast offs in Vegas and won a lot and outcoached DE, and Deano had no answers or adjustments other than to change goalies, game two in Dallas, no adjustments for their PP or our lines, only when the game is out of hand .

    He's no Craig Berube who adjusted the shit out of DE the year before after a two game lead...so you tell me? Castoffs? with KK, Zucci, a young Boldy in the mix. He failed to take control of the team, dumb penalty after dumb penalty, played a guy with a broken fibula, and his adjustment was complain to the officials because he wasn't getting the calls instead of focusing on the problem, fair calls or unfair, that's the game. DeBoer blew off the Dumba call and took the focus away for his team and adjusted to the game.

    DE coached this team to two 100+ point season. Kudos!, but he has a lot to learn about playoff hockey and I don't see BG being patient enough to let it go beyond 25-26 if things don't change in the playoffs.

    So what are the probabilities BG hires another Berube or DeBoer? The odds are whoever he hires to replace him does no better and likely does worse.  

    Funny how a lot of posters here will say how the team lacks talent and then want DE fired for not getting past the first round. If you're asking me it's a wonder how we even made the playoffs for two years never mind setting the mark for the franchise' best win record.

    Is Dean perfect? Hell no, but who is. It ain't like it's easy to just go out and find a Stanley Cup coach. I'd hate to have to wait out another 3, 4, 5 years because DE doesn't make it past the 1'st round with a 15 million dollar handicap. 

    Edited by Willy the poor boy
    • Like 3
    • Confused 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, Willy the poor boy said:

    You always act like DE is a fuckup who doesn't know what he's doing. He coached this team of castoffs, for the most part, into the playoffs for two years now when no one thought that he had the talent to make it. 

    Evason is an excellent regular season coach, but it is well documented he doesn't win playoff series. With what he's had, he's done real well. He's been the best coach we've ever had at taking care of business with the bottom teams, but he leaves something to be desired in series with top 10 teams. Generally speaking, he is simply outgunned, but he hasn't done himself any favors with matchups and small tweaks. I believe he won't overcome this and we will see a new coach next season or the year after, a proven playoff coach. Maybe a guy like Mike Sullivan?

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, mnfaninnc said:

    Evason is an excellent regular season coach, but it is well documented he doesn't win playoff series. With what he's had, he's done real well. He's been the best coach we've ever had at taking care of business with the bottom teams, but he leaves something to be desired in series with top 10 teams. Generally speaking, he is simply outgunned, but he hasn't done himself any favors with matchups and small tweaks. I believe he won't overcome this and we will see a new coach next season or the year after, a proven playoff coach. Maybe a guy like Mike Sullivan?

    How is he supposed to get past the first round with a lack of talent? I'm almost positive I've seen you write that quite often. I'm just trying to understand your thinking. They don't have the talent yet they are supposed to get past round 1 against teams who have the cap advantage and have far deeper teams. 

    I thought for the most part they outplayed Dallas, to bad Deano can't put the puck in the net for them. They just got a new special teams coach, let's see how that works out. That is and has been the biggest failing of this team IMO. 

    • Like 2
    • Confused 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Will MN regret not getting Mike Babcock before he was hired in Columbus? :classic_cool:

    Is Kurt Russel available? Get him one of those Herb Brooks suits or perhaps Gordon Bombay who I've suggested before. Get him out on the frozen pond to re-live his childhood failures and parlay that into coaching losers to a Championship. Nah, Dean is gonna wanna avoid the hot-seat. I think he might wanna switch it up a bit though and roll with some of those Herb Brooks suits though.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Ok. The Stramel puck is winning me over. My hope is that the kid rebounds like Boldy did after his freshman season.

    I'm not a Minnesota St. Fan, per sé, but I respect the hell out of what Mike Hastings was able to accomplish doen there. I think as head coach of a once former proud program with the abilities to be a first option for many players in the area, rather than constantly recruiting kids that might've been turned down once or twice, he'll bee really good in Wisconsin...as much as it pains me to say that.

    But, it's up to the kid. He'll be given ample opportunities, and maybe even ones he doesn't yet deserve based on performance, and he'll have to shine. Hope he does. Would be awesome for a hometown kid to not just be a good story, but one that can be a tru difference maker for the Wild.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 minutes ago, Protec said:

    Will MN regret not getting Mike Babcock before he was hired in Columbus? :classic_cool:

    Is Kurt Russel available? Get him one of those Herb Brooks suits or perhaps Gordon Bombay who I've suggested before. Get him out on the frozen pond to re-live his childhood failures and parlay that into coaching losers to a Championship. Nah, Dean is gonna wanna avoid the hot-seat. I think he might wanna switch it up a bit though and roll with some of those Herb Brooks suits though.

    I think it's more like Columbus will regret hiring Babcock. I pretty much believe he proves my point eventually. Columbus had their pick they chose Babcock and I 'think' that ends badly for them. (shrug)

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, Willy the poor boy said:

    So what are the probabilities BG hires another Berube or DeBoer? The odds are whoever he hires to replace him does no better and likely does worse.  

    Funny how a lot of posters here will say how the team lacks talent and then want DE fired for not getting past the first round. If you're asking me it's a wonder how we even made the playoffs for two years never mind setting the mark for the franchise' best win record.

    Is Dean perfect? Hell no, but who is. It ain't like it's easy to just go out and find a Stanley Cup coach. I'd hate to have to wait out another 3, 4, 5 years because DE doesn't make it past the 1'st round with a 15 million dollar handicap. 

    With the talent we are going to have and the salary cap we expect in 25-26 BG will have whatever coach he wishes that are available. 

    If you want to settle for what you see on the ice as far as coaching? We're missing out.

    Did you see what Vegas did with their coaching decisions. Do you want to make a Cup run with DE.

    We're not gonna miss out on anything with BG. If you want to hope for the best keep living in DE shadow. The cap is an excuse, we had the opportunity in the playoffs the past two years and got outcoached.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, Willy the poor boy said:

    So what are the probabilities BG hires another Berube or DeBoer? The odds are whoever he hires to replace him does no better and likely does worse.  

    Funny how a lot of posters here will say how the team lacks talent and then want DE fired for not getting past the first round. If you're asking me it's a wonder how we even made the playoffs for two years never mind setting the mark for the franchise' best win record.

    Is Dean perfect? Hell no, but who is. It ain't like it's easy to just go out and find a Stanley Cup coach. I'd hate to have to wait out another 3, 4, 5 years because DE doesn't make it past the 1'st round with a 15 million dollar handicap. 

    In year one, a goofy COVID bubble, git an early lead to Vancouver and let Travis Green beat him. 

    Pete DeBoer beat him in Vegas in 7 games. Ok, fine, the team was building, finally had their star forward, and were building a prospect pool.

     

    Best record in the regular season, had thr Blues on the ropes, and let them off the hook. In the run up to the postseason, it was reported he hardly practiced. Tough to break out of PK slump that's killing you in the playoffs if you don't practice. Also, this season very much the season of the Roncor Cooker lines. He liked to set it and forget it. Never making changes until he had to. In Game 6, changes were too late, and too small of changes to mean anything of substance.

     

    Ok, this last season, he's learned right? But not really. Lines were etched in stone again, even while Zuccarello was slumping...hard. Fast forward to the playoffs, he didn't make lineup changes. Changed the goalie into Game 2 after Gustavsson put on one helluva show in Game 1. Ok, Gus was really out of it, fine, Game 2 for Flower. But the Wild had the Stars reeling. And again, he let the other team off the hook. What's frustrating is he let the same things pit the nail in the coffin for him. Bad special teams -> Check. No line blender -> Check. Focus on tone setting and grit rather than winning -> Check.

    Oh and name me a prospect he's brought along that wasn't Uber talented when they arrived like Boldy and Kaprizov. I'll wait.

    Dean hasn't been able to fix the myriads of issues on special teams despite having the most talent on the PP this team has ever had, and the grinders on the PK he wants.

    There's no leash to prospects. And slow to adjust, or not at all in the playoffs all because they have this preconceived notion of "how playoff hockey is supposed to be played." Nah man, you're supposed to just win. That's all anyone cares about and until you do, that's all they're going to care about.

    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Also, this team does have talent. I think it's deep and quite skilled. Are there holes? Sure. And there's a lot of skill and talent coming soon. But it's young talent, and the vets that they fill out the roster with is old (Zuccarello), not good (Merrill), ineffective (Goligoski), or playing way above their role (Gaudreau). And none of those vets are tipping the balance in a postseason.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    39 minutes ago, joebou15 said:

    In year one, a goofy COVID bubble, git an early lead to Vancouver and let Travis Green beat him. 

    Pete DeBoer beat him in Vegas in 7 games. Ok, fine, the team was building, finally had their star forward, and were building a prospect pool.

     

    Best record in the regular season, had thr Blues on the ropes, and let them off the hook. In the run up to the postseason, it was reported he hardly practiced. Tough to break out of PK slump that's killing you in the playoffs if you don't practice. Also, this season very much the season of the Roncor Cooker lines. He liked to set it and forget it. Never making changes until he had to. In Game 6, changes were too late, and too small of changes to mean anything of substance.

     

    Ok, this last season, he's learned right? But not really. Lines were etched in stone again, even while Zuccarello was slumping...hard. Fast forward to the playoffs, he didn't make lineup changes. Changed the goalie into Game 2 after Gustavsson put on one helluva show in Game 1. Ok, Gus was really out of it, fine, Game 2 for Flower. But the Wild had the Stars reeling. And again, he let the other team off the hook. What's frustrating is he let the same things pit the nail in the coffin for him. Bad special teams -> Check. No line blender -> Check. Focus on tone setting and grit rather than winning -> Check.

    Oh and name me a prospect he's brought along that wasn't Uber talented when they arrived like Boldy and Kaprizov. I'll wait.

    Dean hasn't been able to fix the myriads of issues on special teams despite having the most talent on the PP this team has ever had, and the grinders on the PK he wants.

    There's no leash to prospects. And slow to adjust, or not at all in the playoffs all because they have this preconceived notion of "how playoff hockey is supposed to be played." Nah man, you're supposed to just win. That's all anyone cares about and until you do, that's all they're going to care about.

    Joebou, thank you for your in depth explanation!

    Maybe after your detailed explanation, the rest of the rubes will finally understand, if not, there's no hope and they'll just have to see it happen... 

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 hours ago, Willy the poor boy said:

    So what are the probabilities BG hires another Berube or DeBoer? The odds are whoever he hires to replace him does no better and likely does worse.  

    Funny how a lot of posters here will say how the team lacks talent and then want DE fired for not getting past the first round. If you're asking me it's a wonder how we even made the playoffs for two years never mind setting the mark for the franchise' best win record.

    Is Dean perfect? Hell no, but who is. It ain't like it's easy to just go out and find a Stanley Cup coach. I'd hate to have to wait out another 3, 4, 5 years because DE doesn't make it past the 1'st round with a 15 million dollar handicap. 

    Yeah let’s just to pluck a Cup winning coach from the fully in-bloom coaching tree. Do people on here actually understand how hard it is to find that caliber of coach on the open market in the offseason? There’s a reason why they don’t come around much. Plus the coaches system has to match the players. Just off the top of my head a coach like Sutter would be a disaster with our lineup. 
     

    Dean is frustrating at times, I get it. His stubbornness in mixing lines being one of them. Special teams has been our biggest achilles heel every postseason. Both scoring (even with ALL the talent we have) and definitely on the kill. Shaw being hurt didn’t do us any favors either. While Dean has the final say he has a coach designated to run them, akin to a coordinator in the NFL. 

     

    Just have to wait and see if the new hire can turn them around. My prediction is that Dean will be given 1-2 seasons after the buyouts and if he can’t advance then yeah he’ll be gone but he’s severely handicapped until that time. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...