Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • Can Kirill Kaprizov Live Up To Highest-Paid-In-the-NHL Billing?


    Image courtesy of Nick Wosika - Imagn Images
    Tony Abbott

    "Dolla Bill Kirill" is about to live up to the name. So long as Kirill Kaprizov signs in Minnesota, he's going to be an incredibly wealthy man sometime in July. Minnesota Wild owner Mr. Craig Leipold has vowed that no one will pay Kaprizov more money than Minnesota will. However, lately, it's possible that no NHL team will pay any player more than the Wild are preparing to pay their superstar.

    On Monday's 32 Thoughts podcast, Elliotte Friedman repeated some hot goss he got from NHL sources. "There are people in the league who believe this will end up being the NHL's highest-paid player," the insider said. "That in this next wave of contracts, with the cap going up... feel that Kaprizov's going to be No. 1 on the list. We'll see."

    The numbers we've seen as educated guesses for that contract figure are pretty staggering. The Athletic's Michael Russo and Joe Smith are throwing out anywhere between $14 million and $16 million for an AAV. $14 million would be notable enough, tying Leon Draisaitl (whose new deal starts next season) for the largest cap hit in the NHL.

    But $16 million? Damn! We're possibly talking about one of the highest cap hits for a player, ever. A $16 million AAV would represent 15.4% of the $104 million salary cap, the highest since Connor McDavid's 15.7% from his 2017 contract. 

    That's a lot of money and a ton of responsibility. If Kaprizov is the highest-paid player -- or even "merely" the highest-paid winger -- that will come with a lot of scrutiny. McDavid (and Draisaitl) have dragged a flawed Edmonton Oilers squad to a Stanley Cup Final. Kaprizov will be expected to do the same thing: Consistently be among the league's best and lead his team to a Stanley Cup. 

    We know Kaprizov's worth a ton of money. Is he worth that much?

    Kaprizov has a great case based on his production alone. Over the past four years, Kaprizov is tied with David Pastrnak for third in the NHL in goals per game (0.60), behind only Auston Matthews and Draisaitl. In terms of points, he's tied with Matthews and Mitch Marner for sixth in points per game (1.27).

    Of course, points aren't everything. So, to determine overall effectiveness, we can look at Evolving-Hockey's Standings Points Above Replacement metric. On there, Kaprizov is 13th in the NHL with 22.8 SPAR over the last four years, just between Roope Hintz (22.9) and Quinn Hughes (22.7). The names above Kaprizov are the usual suspects: McDavid, Matthews, Nathan MacKinnon, Pastrnak, Jason Robertson, Draisaitl, Matthew Tkachuk, Marner, Elias Pettersson, Nikita Kucherov, and Sasha Barkov

    However, putting Kaprizov 13th might be a touch misleading. He's missed 64 games of a possible 324 during that time. So let's now put everyone on an even footing and see where he lands when we look at SPAR per hour (minimum 3,000 minutes):

    1. McDavid, 0.337 SPAR/60
    2. Matthews, 0.318
    3. Pastrnak, 0.285
    4. Tkachuk, 0.273
    5. MacKinnon, 0.270
    6. Robertson, 0.267
    7. Joe Pavelski (retired), 0.259
    8. Hintz, 0.255
    T-9. KAPRIZOV, 0.249
    T-9. Pettersson, 0.249

    Either way... we see a similar placing for Kaprizov. He's the sixth-best winger in the NHL in terms of raw SPAR, and the fourth-best active winger in SPAR per hour. Does that mean he's not worth the money Minnesota's about to pay him?

    Well, that depends.

    Is there an argument for Kaprizov being the best player in the NHL? No, not really. Kaprizov was an early favorite for the Hart Trophy until he got injured around Christmas, but even so, he was only fifth in points per game last season. Even if you doubled his 4.0 SPAR to get to an 82-game pace, he'd still lag behind Draisaitl (9.6 SPAR) and Thomas Harley (8.4).

    Through that lens, making Kaprizov the top-paid player in the league is arguably an overpay, but in a more practical sense: Who cares?

    Coming into the season, Kaprizov ranked in the 2A tier on The Athletic's NHL Player Tier List. That list is generated with considerable input from NHL executives, coaches, and more. After this season, not to mention his five-goal, nine-point playoff performance, he may sneak into the 1C tier, or perhaps higher. Last season, there were just three wingers in Tier 1: Kucherov (1B), Pastrnak (1C), and Tkachuk (1C). 

    Even if you think all three players are better than Kaprizov, the Wild have no shot at getting Kucherov or Tkachuk, for any dollar amount. The rebuilding Bruins might or might not put Pastrnak on the block, but he'd have a fair amount of suitors. The odds that Minnesota would land him are also low.

    Meanwhile, Minnesota does have a good shot at landing Kaprizov. They can pay him more than anyone, and are fully willing to do so. The Wild don't get chances to land even borderline top-tier guys often. They took a chance on something comparable 13 years ago with the Zach Parise and Ryan Suter contracts. Kaprizov is considerably closer to the elite than either of those guys, and for a franchise like Minnesota, any price is worth it. 

    Stars matter in the NHL, as the Colorado Avalanche found out when they lost Mikko Rantanen, only for him to eliminate their team with a Game 7 hat trick. If you're the Wild, you pay whatever it takes to avoid that fate for yourself.

    The good thing is: they know it.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Thanks 2

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    I am sure most of us would like him signed no matter that dollar amount.  If it is at the lower end at 14M, great, a little more money for the rest of the roster.  But if he gets 16M, I am fine with it.  We have never had a player of his caliber, so a couple mill a year won’t hurt my feelings.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    19 minutes ago, SkolWild73 said:

    I am sure most of us would like him signed no matter that dollar amount.  If it is at the lower end at 14M, great, a little more money for the rest of the roster.  But if he gets 16M, I am fine with it.  We have never had a player of his caliber, so a couple mill a year won’t hurt my feelings.

    Agreed. What 2M impact piece would be missing out on?

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    47 minutes ago, Enforceror said:

    Agreed. What 2M impact piece would be missing out on?

    Probably not much.  Just 2M more to offer someone if it came down to that.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Citizen Strife said:

    Minnesota can't be choosy. Just do it.

    I remain apprehensive. 

    He is the best MN has had. Great player. Worthy of being called the best the Wild have had. 

    Coming off the worst contract penalties in the history of hockey, should the Wild go hard? OCL helped get the Wild in a bind once already. Now he's speaking out of turn and giving Kirill the farm so to speak. 

    It seems unwise. Give him a great offer. Don't give him the highest paid, long deal. He's great but I think he's in the top 15-20 guys and he's not a center. I think you wanna stay at or below 13M. People are scared he'll wanna leave. 12M/5yrs is what I think makes sense and was maybe realistic given this season. Except OCL said that public stuff and now my gut says <13M would be an insult or appear to be cheapskate-offer. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Last season, there were just three wingers in Tier 1: Kucherov (1B), Pastrnak (1C), and Tkachuk (1C). None of these three are better than Kap. Pay him and make Kap highest paid player in the league. He is worth it. 

    And this is all just until the next star is up for the contract. Which will come in higher than Kap. So set the market now, but it's a matter of time before someone else pays more. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    In terms of the savings, I think it's more about what MN can do in the shuffle. 2-3M on it's own may not seem like much, but combined with let's say Fred's money if he were traded and some available cap and MN could afford a more expensive bigger name player. Especially if part of larger picture puzzle. 

    My.02 cents. 

    I been liking the idea to offer-sheet Knies from Toronto or perhaps try to trade for Pastrnak, something big but not as risky as diving back into an albatross contractike the 11/20 deals. 

    I think Kirill will continue to be great but is he top 5 in the NHL. At times, yes. It's kinda already done in my mind due to OCL's comments. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Protec said:

    In terms of the savings, I think it's more about what MN can do in the shuffle. 2-3M on it's own may not seem like much, but combined with let's say Fred's money if he were traded and some available cap and MN could afford a more expensive bigger name player. Especially if part of larger picture puzzle. 

    My.02 cents. 

    I been liking the idea to offer-sheet Knies from Toronto or perhaps try to trade for Pastrnak, something big but not as risky as diving back into an albatross contractike the 11/20 deals. 

    I think Kirill will continue to be great but is he top 5 in the NHL. At times, yes. It's kinda already done in my mind due to OCL's comments. 

    Imagine if Billy signs Kap AND trades for Pasta? Or Kap leaves and we sign Brock 

    time will tell 😎🍺

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, Protec said:

    It seems unwise. Give him a great offer. Don't give him the highest paid, long deal. He's great but I think he's in the top 15-20 guys and he's not a center. I think you wanna stay at or below 13M. People are scared he'll wanna leave. 12M/5yrs is what I think makes sense and was maybe realistic given this season. Except OCL said that public stuff and now my gut says <13M would be an insult or appear to be cheapskate-offer. 

    The caveat with all this is Kaprizov's NMC. If he doesn't sign and goes on the trade market, any return will be peanuts. If he plays out the season and then walks, it should be the beginning of the end for Guerin's tenure. If he is going to take a lowball offer, it would probably be with a team that is closer to winning a cup than the Wild (and yes, the Wild are not there yet). But with what went down with Rantanen fresh on everyone's mind, I believe a deal gets done in the $15M-$16M range, although part of me feels Kap is pretty level-headed, and likes being a big fish in a small pond with a passionate fan base, and comes in matching Draisaitl's number...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...