Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness
  • Brock Faber Is the First Building Block Of Minnesota's New-Look Defense Corps


    Image courtesy of © Jerome Miron-USA TODAY Sports
    Justin Hein

    Hockey Wilderness is counting down the Minnesota Wild’s Top-10 Prospects, as voted by our staff. Today, we give you everything you need to know about our No. 2 prospect, Brock Faber

    While his glasses make him look like the most handsome Hanson brother, Brock Faber’s reputation for elite defense is more than earned. 

    Born in 2002, Hometown Hero Brock Faber grew up in Maple Grove. He played Triple-A around the Twin Cities, then joined the US National Team Development program at age 16. A year later, Faber played full-time in the USNTDP, then committed to the University of Minnesota. 

    As a true freshman, he debuted with the Gophers and made the Big 10’s All-Freshman team alongside players like Matty Beniers and Owen Power. In the offseason, Faber added a gold medal at the World Junior Championship. The following season, he was All-Conference and named Big 10 Defensive Player of the Year at the geriatric age of 19. That summer, the Los Angeles Kings traded him to Minnesota as part of the Kevin Fiala deal. Hey Brock, remember that guy who scored 11 points in 5 games when you were 17? You’re supposed to help replace him -- no pressure. 

    In 2022-23, Faber was a cornerstone of the stacked Gophers team that fell just short of a championship in a shocking 3-2 overtime loss to Quinnipiac. Welcome to Minnesota doesn’t really apply here since he grew up watching first-round exits along with the rest of this state. Fans can hope that only fuels him. 

    Faber’s tape and statistics agree that defense is the strength of his game. Who can forget his diving play to save overtime in this year’s playoffs? 

    There’s a lot more here than just the diving spectacle. First, Faber pressures Max Domi at the blue line, which leads Kaprizov to take him out of the play. That’s a classic unheralded defensive play, a shining example of him doing the little things right. 

    Next, he glides laterally back to cover Mason Marchment. The edge-work on display as Faber recovers back to his right might actually be more impressive than the diving poke check. He’s back in his spot so quickly that he’s looking for work before Ty Dellandrea takes the shot, which helps him sniff out the danger of the coming rebound. That puts him in position to pivot anywhere at the net-front, which is why he beats Marchment to the rebound. 

    Faber displayed elite agility, and don’t forget that he’s playing at NHL size. The Wild list him at 6’1”, which is laughable, knowing that Marchment (Dallas No. 27) is 6’4”. 

    Aside from the X’s and O’s of it, the playoff setting says even more about Faber’s temperament. For most defensemen, this is a welcome to the big-time moment. Faber registers the danger, contorts his body, and just does his job. It’s the biggest stage of his life, the most important play of the game, and the biggest moment of this team’s season. This play happens 88 minutes into the game, and his unflappability is undoubtedly why Faber has been a captain everywhere he goes. 

    It takes more than playing the right way for a player to excel in the NHL. Furthermore, players need to have a personal X-factor that allows them to put their stamp on the game. Getting acquainted with the righty’s highlight reel, it becomes clear that Faber’s skating is his superpower. 

     

    On top of his diving poke check in the NHL playoffs, Faber’s edges sent Michigan junior forward Philippe Lapointe flying to kick off his 2022-23 highlight video. That’s what makes Faber such an effective two-way defender. Defending the rush, he can hang with anybody in college. On the offensive point, Faber is always in the right place as a pressure-release pass. Receiving the pass, he motors wherever needed to facilitate the offense. 

    Faber’s edge work is really on display in this overtime assist.

    No doubt Logan Cooley makes things easier with his relentless forecheck, but this is not an easy defensive play because Matthew Knies (Gophers No. 89) loses contain on the speedy Huskies forward Veeti Miettinen at the blue line. Miettinen cuts to his forehand, but Faber’s elite gap control forces him to hit the brakes rather than maintain speed with crossovers. Faber then displays elite balance and stick-checking to reach across his body to poke the puck out of Miettinen’s forehand. 

    Faber transitions this play to offense remarkably fast. He moves the puck to Cooley and sprints into the play, creating a small area two-on-one rush. That allows Cooley to work his magic because the Huskies defender is in conflict. 

    Faber’s offense is a complicated topic, but he made a concerted effort to improve it last season. Lassi Alanen of Elite Prospects tracked Faber’s 2022-23 season through several reliable statistical categories. While this is hard-core nerd stuff, it also aligns with traditional hockey philosophy. Most of these statistics are things that coaches love: shot attempts, zone exits, zone entries, puck battles, penalties drawn, and penalties taken. While the sample isn’t massive, that’s the reality of scouting prospects. 

    What really pops here is that he’s rated at a 97th-percentile creator of offense among blue-liners. Much of that is driven by shot assists and passes across the slot, which Faber can create because of his poise and quick feet from the point. 

    The Gophers’ stacked roster certainly padded these stats. On the other hand, those players benefit from Faber’s defensive support, so it’s challenging to take everything away from Faber. As always, isolating an individual performance is complicated in a team sport. 

    2023-24 will be the biggest test of Faber’s career. He showed well in his NHL action against a Dallas Stars lineup that was deep at forward. On the other hand, it seems that head coach Dean Evason went out of his way to find favorable matchups for the rookie. Anthony LaPanta noted this multiple times on the Worst Seats in the House podcast. Brett Marshall notes that in his playoff debut, Faber’s most common forward opponents were fourth-liners Mason Marchment and Max Domi. These are pretty good players for anybody’s fourth line, but we still don’t know if Faber can perform against the best players in the world.

    While the conventional wisdom is that defensemen take two to three full seasons to acclimate to the NHL, Faber has made a habit of seamless transitions to the next level. He’s been the best defender in the Big 10 for two straight years. But his freshman-year performance was even more impressive than that. When the Kings drafted Faber, their Director of Player Personnel Nelson Emerson raved, “It’s not usually like this, where everything goes so smoothly and a player has so much success (moving up a level).”

    If Faber could transition to the NCAA so easily that it got him drafted, maybe he can recapture that magic to kick off a long NHL career. He’s got the unflappable air of a top-pairing defenseman. A proving ground awaits him come October. 

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 4
    • Thanks 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    23 hours ago, Will D. Ness said:

    I'm not so sure about the trade myself being a good trade in terms of relative value.  

    Having a somewhat known high end offensive talent in Fiala (granted it was a contract year) vs a late 1st rd pick plus Faber was pretty one sided for LA.  Fiala has helped turn that team around on a dime and has shown that he has actually turned a corner and it wasn't a contract year fluke.

    Faber does look good but Ohgren is a complete question mark really.  Jury is still out  but as of right now the trade is squarely in LA's favor.  We should have gotten a little more value the day of the trade, and probably in hindsight even more now.

    So if your a big Fiala fan and didn't think we got enough, minus the culture issues. Ohgren is another EEK type player plus at wing.

    Would you really want to risk losing Boldy after a bridge deal to sign FiFi. Plus mnfaninnc makes an excellent point about Yurov who's gonna make you say Fiala who?

    Guess you'll have to wait n see to be a believer when LA blows up and the Wild are smiling back.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    13 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    Will D., what do you consider more value? Another prospect? Another draft pick? Even here, it seems that defenders who can keep the puck out of the net are undervalued when we've been watching Brodin do it so well. I was hoping for a center prospect as the Kings seemed to have a plethora of them. Who/what did you want?

    As things look, this trade has 3 pieces in it: Faber, Ohgren and Yurov. If we don't take Ohgren at 19, we probably don't get Yurov a few picks later, so there is some fluency to the actual deal. 

    It's not really apples to apples but look at the Chychrun trade.  I would say Fiala is quite a bit more valuable so I would add on another conditional 1st down the road.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    57 minutes ago, vonlonster67 said:

    So if your a big Fiala fan and didn't think we got enough, minus the culture issues. Ohgren is another EEK type player plus at wing.

    Would you really want to risk losing Boldy after a bridge deal to sign FiFi. Plus mnfaninnc makes an excellent point about Yurov who's gonna make you say Fiala who?

    Guess you'll have to wait n see to be a believer when LA blows up and the Wild are smiling back.

    I would take Boldy over Fiala if it would have been one or the other.  Boldy is going to be a monster IMO.  

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    35 minutes ago, Will D. Ness said:

    It's not really apples to apples but look at the Chychrun trade.  I would say Fiala is quite a bit more valuable so I would add on another conditional 1st down the road.

    Would another team even throw in, say a 2029 1st? I think that would make me chuckle. But why not ask for something like that?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    33 minutes ago, Will D. Ness said:

    I would take Boldy over Fiala if it would have been one or the other.  Boldy is going to be a monster IMO.

    I don't think it was one over the other. I think Shooter would have had to do some real roster gymnastics to get it to fit. I think shedding costs, you might be looking at subtracting Zuccarello or Spurgeon, something that might not have been a bad thing. 

    Of course, I disagree wholeheartedly with Von's take on the poor culture player. The Wild had a strong locker room, and winning tends to trump that. Fiala and Boldy had a very nice chemistry going. What would that look like with Ek as the center? I also disagree with the disappearing in the playoffs. I thought Fiala was positioned very well, but the final 6 games of the regular season, you could tell his hot streak was over and he was fighting the puck. It carried over. He had the chances, just fired them high and wide. To me, a disappearance in the playoffs is that you never see the player even getting chances.

    • Confused 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    45 minutes ago, Will D. Ness said:

    I would take Boldy over Fiala if it would have been one or the other.  Boldy is going to be a monster IMO.  

    I agree wholeheartedly, that is a biggest reason I believe Fiala is gone. Boldy is a cornerstone player like KK. I feel Faber follows that path!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    I don't think it was one over the other. I think Shooter would have had to do some real roster gymnastics to get it to fit. I think shedding costs, you might be looking at subtracting Zuccarello or Spurgeon, something that might not have been a bad thing. 

    Of course, I disagree wholeheartedly with Von's take on the poor culture player. The Wild had a strong locker room, and winning tends to trump that. Fiala and Boldy had a very nice chemistry going. What would that look like with Ek as the center? I also disagree with the disappearing in the playoffs. I thought Fiala was positioned very well, but the final 6 games of the regular season, you could tell his hot streak was over and he was fighting the puck. It carried over. He had the chances, just fired them high and wide. To me, a disappearance in the playoffs is that you never see the player even getting chances.

    I watched Fiala every night, saw the good the bad and the ugly hissy fits on the ice.

    Can't tell me that didn't happen behind the scenes and a big reason they took him to arbitration.

    BG had enough of his tude and cleaned house similar to others who didn't fit the culture. 

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, vonlonster67 said:

    I watched Fiala every night, saw the good the bad and the ugly hissy fits on the ice.

    There's a lot that doesn't get picked up by the cameras when just watching on tv. If you've got a good shot of it live at the arena, I've got nothing in response. However, Tkachuk is a similar player who tends to have antics on the bench. That's never really bothered me.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    27 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    There's a lot that doesn't get picked up by the cameras when just watching on tv. If you've got a good shot of it live at the arena, I've got nothing in response. However, Tkachuk is a similar player who tends to have antics on the bench. That's never really bothered me.

    I have season tickets

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    For everyone excited about Faber after a handful of NHL games, and I am, those same people want to trade Rossi after a small sample size as well. 

     

    How about we just let things play out a bit. And for God's sake, Dean, let the kids play. 

    • Thanks 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    Would another team even throw in, say a 2029 1st? I think that would make me chuckle. But why not ask for something like that?

    Well 2029 is like next generation but an asset is an asset.  I was thinking 2026 or so.  There was more on the table basically is what I'm saying.  Fiala's value to LA is more than any trade for the past couple years... maybe the one exception is Florida getting Tkachuk?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    32 minutes ago, FredJohnson said:

    Does Faby-Baby pair with J-Bro to form an elite D-pair or with an offensive-minded player like Addison to balance the pairing out? (Or pair with a more rounded vet like Spurge?)

    Judd has great point on his latest pod.  Faber + JoBro frees up jobro because he now knows he doesn’t have to backstop Dumba anymore.  Not predicting jobro becomes makar but we could see another level from brodin this year.  

    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    19 hours ago, joebou15 said:

    For everyone excited about Faber after a handful of NHL games, and I am, those same people want to trade Rossi after a small sample size as well. 

     

    How about we just let things play out a bit. And for God's sake, Dean, let the kids play. 

    Apples and Oranges

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    Judd has great point on his latest pod.  Faber + JoBro frees up jobro because he now knows he doesn’t have to backstop Dumba anymore.  Not predicting jobro becomes makar but we could see another level from brodin this year.  

    You are definitely onto something and NOT on something!

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 8/26/2023 at 7:40 AM, vonlonster67 said:

    Your pretending and burying your head in the snow if you think Fiala's talent outweighs the culture of the team. It's hardly badmouthing, but calling out all his BS we saw on the ice most nights and his inconsistencies. How soon we forget.

    These two including Faber are team oriented and live for pressure, give me more. Fiala is old news and his movement off this team and return was a brilliant move by BG

    Where did I say Fiala’s talent outweighs the culture here? I made the comment that the guy who goes value gets downgraded and the incoming guy(s) might get unnecessarily upgraded before we see it. It is just something us fans do.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, Sviginak said:

    Where did I say Fiala’s talent outweighs the culture here? I made the comment that the guy who goes value gets downgraded and the incoming guy(s) might get unnecessarily upgraded before we see it. It is just something us fans do.

    I wasn't inferring you said that, but BG being old school didn't see him as a value if he continued the hissy fits, one ice, off ice with coaches, getting benched for not following team concepts.

    I believe we are lucky to have gotten what we did and I'm not convinced it wont happen again in LA with Fiala. Sorry if I offended you and your right its about what fans do!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    And there we have it folks, unprecedented and unequalled expertise has come aboard the Wilderness train and they have season tickets! 🙂 

    (For the record, I am through with pretending and I have pulled my head out of the snow) 

    • Sad 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 minutes ago, Sviginak said:

    And there we have it folks, unprecedented and unequalled expertise has come aboard the Wilderness train and they have season tickets! 🙂 

    (For the record, I am through with pretending and I have pulled my head out of the snow) 

    Nice!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 8/28/2023 at 3:22 PM, vonlonster67 said:

    You are definitely onto something and NOT on something!

    Or Brodin is what he is at 31 years old and were just not going to see a bump in offense. I don't believe Brodin has been/was held back by Dumba as his pair in any way. They both got tough deployment, lot of minutes and still the offense wasn't making a jump. The coaches don't put him on the PP unless there's injuries. 

    Brodin is a net positive on the ice for the Minnesota Wild, and has been for the entirety of his career. But there just isn't offense like people have been hoping for.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, joebou15 said:

    Or Brodin is what he is at 31 years old and were just not going to see a bump in offense. I don't believe Brodin has been/was held back by Dumba as his pair in any way. They both got tough deployment, lot of minutes and still the offense wasn't making a jump. The coaches don't put him on the PP unless there's injuries. 

    Brodin is a net positive on the ice for the Minnesota Wild, and has been for the entirety of his career. But there just isn't offense like people have been hoping for.

    He is pretty damn good yet. I have yet to see another Dman who shuts down McDavid like he does.

    Dumba did hold him back in the matter of Dumba making entries or turnovers and forgetting his coverage of the ice. Brodin was the safety blanket and Dumba rarely returned the favor. 

    Imagine the goals scored if he's not on the ice. I hope DE plugs him in with Faber. Gonna be a fun tandem to watch.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...